Ecological Conflict Areas in the Basin Affected by Waterway Transport Development

PL - CZ ain Danube-Oder-Elbe Canal -M Straubing-Vilshofen This mega-navigation project has yet ine be not been justified on economic grounds; Rh nu Questionable need for impounding it would alter or destroy over 400,000 ha a al the last ecologically valuable of protected river sites. First conflict: D n Danube stretch in Germany.

a S# The already initiated port project near

C $ Strong local opposition. . $ Y# Brno S#

SK S# Wachau a

$ S#

v Gabcikovo

Regensburg As a UNESCO World a

$ r

$ Heritage Site and very o The still unsolved bilateral conflict

$

Î$ M S# MD

$ important tourist area, over the use of Danube water for

$ $ $ $ S# rkm 2300 it is not compatible with a h a power plant versus for the ecosystem. S# á Bed erosion problem downstream from

be river bed re-construction. V Y#

S# anu the Gabcikovo dam.

D $

rkm 2400 Î $ Krems Bratislava S $ $ Î $ # #

ar S S ir P Chisinau

$ S# e # UA

Is Î Y r

t u

$

$ rkm 2100 $ $ t rkm 2200 $ S#

Î $ rkm 2000 oly S# n Î Y# $ Ip

In S# $ rkm 1700 Danube Upstream

Y# München rkm 1900 Gabcikovo Î $ Impoundment plans have been S#

Enns Wien Komarno S# $ abandoned; the navigation channel m Î works affect protected islands and So e

D Austrian Danube National Park S# Budapest s New US#krainian Canal

a Î the national park. S#Planned strong bed constriction and b rkm 1800 $ A new navigation canal is to be built through á deepening is in conflict with all R a S# the core zone of the "Danube Biosphere Reserve". s Ust-

ecological needs of the national park. i s

rkm 1600 T Körö Y# S# Dunaisk

$

S# Î H $ Kilija Î Dunaújvaros $ Î S# Y# S# Danube Port of Giurgiulesti A new oil port brings major pollution ÎS# Danube Between Paks (H) risks for the Danube delta. ÎY# A and Beograd (FRY) Galati Î CH Mures Y# S# The natural dynamics led to a unique rkm 1500 S# S# S# BrailÎa S# self-restoration of the Lower Î Bája S# and the HR-FRY Danube sections. Î S# rkm 200

I This is threatened by planned river

regulation and border correction. S# $ Y# RO

Ljubljana $ Y#

D D T $

r D S#

Y# Zagreb av C anal $

a rkm 1400 S# $ $

# $ rkm 300

Y O

S S# $ Constanta l SLO a $ v Î t Bucuresti LEGEND Kupa a S# rkm 1200 Danube-

rkm 400 Î

HR Î rkm 940 Canal

Vukovar Pancevo $ Border Danube River Basin Rail $ Iron Gate S#

7 Î S# Dams

Metropolis ( > 1 Million Inhabitants) Î Y# Danube--Adria Canal $ Rijeka S# rkm 1100 I and II rkm 500 A questionable project (dams, S# Î Î # Cities (250 000 - 1 Million Inhabitants) Smederevo S a drainage/irrigation) that would S# e ÎRuse S# ub e Towns (100 000 - 250 000 Inhabitants) destroy the still intact Sava S# Beograd Dan meanders and floodplains. S# S V rkm 800 e D FRY k r l. Î Y# c in M a rkm 700 rkm 600 o Î a

Sarajevo S# Danube Islands Between l

NAVIGABLE RIVER STRETCHES: r Lom a B $ va Bulgaria and Dams with Locks S# A 500 km near-natural section with BIH kar over 60 islands, remnants of the Reservoirs S# Is BG former extended riverine landscape, is threatened by new river bed Waterway ECE IV, V, VI, VII regulation plans. Waterway ECE II, III Floodplains with high Ecological Quality Sofija S# Impounded Stretches Strongly Regulated Stretches Impounding dams along the navigable Danube Free-flowing Stretches 1. Bachhausen (D) 13. Ottensheim-Wilhering (A) 2. Berching (D) 14. Mauthausen (A) Canals Waterway Transport 3. Dietfurth (D) 15. Wallsee-Mitterkirchen (A) Projected Canals 4. Riedenburg (D) 16. Ybbs-Persenbeug (A) on Europe's Lifeline, Other Rivers 5. Kehlheim (D) 17. Melk (A) the Danube Î Important River Port 6. Bad Abbach (D) 18. Rossatz (A) 7. (D) 19. Altenwörth (A) Î Sea and River Port 8. Geisling (D) 20. Greifenstein (A) , January 2002 N 9. Straubing (D) 21. Vienna-Freudenau (A) Produced by 50 0 50 100 Kilometers 10. Kachlet (D) 22. Gabcikovo (SK) ZINKE ENVIRONMENT CONSULTING 11. Jochenstein (D/A) 23. Iron Gate I (FRY/RO) for Central and Eastern Europe, Vienna Scale: 1: 4 500 000 12. Aschach (A) 24. Iron Gate II (FRY/RO) Cartography by U.SCHWARZ, FLUVIUS