DOCSLIB.ORG

A Resource Evaluation Model for a Solar Vortex Power Generation System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Resource Evaluation Model for a Solar Vortex Power Generation System MEETING OFF-GRID TRANSPORTATION ENERGY NEEDS: A RESOURCE EVALUATION MODEL FOR A SOLAR VORTEX POWER GENERATION SYSTEM A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Amy Marie Moore In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology December 2016 Copyright © 2016 Amy Marie Moore MEETING OFF-GRID TRANSPORTATION ENERGY NEEDS: A RESOURCE EVALUATION MODEL FOR A SOLAR VORTEX POWER GENERATION SYSTEM Approved by: Dr. Michael O. Rodgers, Advisor Dr. Ari Glezer, Committee School of Civil and Environmental Member Engineering Woodruff School of Mechanical Georgia Institute of Technology Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Randall Guensler, Committee Member School of Civil and Environmental Dr. William Drummond, Engineering Committee Member Georgia Institute of Technology School of City and Regional Planning Dr. Susan Burns, Committee Member Georgia Institute of Technology School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: November 9, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Global Climate Change ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Transportation Sector’s Impact on Global Climate Change ............................................ 2 1.2.1 Reducing the Transportation Sector’s Impact ........................................................... 4 1.2.2 The Need for Off-Grid Energy Production .................................................................... 5 1.2.3 The National Parks: Reducing the Transportation Sector’s Impact at the Micro- Level 5 CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION IN THE NATIONAL PARKS ............................................ 7 2.1 Overview of Transportation Energy Needs at the National Parks ........................................ 7 2.2 Ongoing Efforts at the National Parks .................................................................................. 9 2.2.1 Green Parks Plan ............................................................................................................ 9 2.2.2 Clean Cities Program ..................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Renewable Energy Usage at National Parks ....................................................................... 10 2.3.1 Small Scale................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Utility Scale ................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations at National Parks ........................................................ 12 2.5 Electric Buses...................................................................................................................... 15 2.6 Transit in National Parks .................................................................................................... 16 2.6.1 Features of Park Transit ............................................................................................... 18 2.6.1.1 Transit Funding ..................................................................................................... 18 2.6.1.2 Parking Problems on Park Property ...................................................................... 19 2.6.1.3 Park Visitors’ Perception of Park Transit ............................................................. 19 2.6.1.4 Park Transit’s Influence on Park Visitation .......................................................... 22 2.6.1.5 Park Transit’s Influence on Surrounding Communities ....................................... 22 CHAPTER 3: SHORT-TERM SOLUTIONS AT THE NATIONAL PARKS AND OTHER OFF-GRID LOCATIONS: LOWER IMPACT FUELS ............................................................... 24 3.1 Green Bus Fleets ................................................................................................................. 24 iii 3.2 Propane ............................................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Compressed Natural Gas..................................................................................................... 26 3.4 Liquefied Natural Gas ......................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Biofuels ............................................................................................................................... 28 3.5.1 Ethanol ......................................................................................................................... 28 3.5.2 Biodiesel ...................................................................................................................... 29 3.6 Long-Term Solutions for the National Parks and Other Off-Grid Locations: Power from Renewable Sources ................................................................................................................... 30 3.6.1 Cogeneration ................................................................................................................ 31 3.6.2 Bio-waste ..................................................................................................................... 32 3.7 Wind and Solar Technologies ........................................................................................ 32 3.7.1 Wind Technologies ...................................................................................................... 33 3.7.2 Solar Technologies....................................................................................................... 34 3.7.2.1 Solar PV arrays ..................................................................................................... 34 3.7.2.2 Concentrated Solar Power..................................................................................... 36 CHAPTER 4: WIND AND SOLAR RESOURCE MODELS ..................................................... 39 4.1 Solar Resource Model ......................................................................................................... 39 4.2 Wind Resource Model ........................................................................................................ 41 4.3 Concentrated Wind Resource Model .................................................................................. 44 CHAPTER 5: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY .............................................................................. 45 5.1 The Solar Vortex (SoV) ...................................................................................................... 45 5.1.1 Design Concept ............................................................................................................ 46 5.1.2 Initial SoV Prototype ................................................................................................... 50 5.1.3 Renewable Power from SoVs ...................................................................................... 53 5.1.4 Comparison of SoV with Wind and Solar ................................................................... 54 5.1.5 Renewable Power from SoVs at National Parks .......................................................... 55 5.1.6 SoV Resource Model ................................................................................................... 56 CHAPTER 6: CONCENTRATED WIND RESOURCE MODEL .............................................. 58 6.1 The GIS Model ................................................................................................................... 59 6.2 MODIS ................................................................................................................................ 60 6.2.1 MODIS Data ................................................................................................................ 64 iv 6.3 Weather Station Variables .................................................................................................. 84 6.3.1 Obtaining Data from NOAA’s NCDC Weather Stations ............................................ 84 6.4.2 Weather Station Variable Data in ArcGIS ................................................................... 86 6.4 Calculation of Sensible and Latent Heat Flux .................................................................... 93 6.4.1 Gamma Calculation ..................................................................................................... 95 6.4.2 Delta Calculation ......................................................................................................... 96 6.4.3 psat ∗ and VPD Calculation ....................................................................................... 96 6.4.4 푝푣 Calculation ............................................................................................................. 97 6.4.5 푝푑 Calculation ............................................................................................................. 97 6.4.6 휌 Calculation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bethesda Park: "The Handsomest Park in the United States"
    THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY STORY Published Quarterly by The Montgomery County Historical Society Philip L. Cantelon Eleanor M. V. Cook President Editor Vol. 34, No. 3 August 1991 BETHESDA PARK: "THE HANDSOMEST PARK IN THE UNITED STATES" by William G. Allman If asked what late-19th century amusement park might have claimed to be "the handsomest park in the United States," first to come to mind would probably be part of the Coney Island complex or, on a more local level, perhaps Glen Echo Park or Marshall Hall. This boast, however, appeared in an 1893 newspaper advertisement for Bethesda Park, a short-lived (1891- 1896?) and rather obscure amusement facility in Montgomery County.1 In this, the centennial year of its inception, an examination of its brief history provides an interesting study of the practices of recreation and amusement in the 1890's and the role they played in suburban development. The last decade of the 19th century was the first decade of the era of the electric street railway, a major improvement in public transportation that contributed greatly to suburban development around American cities. With a significant extension of the radius of practicable commuting from the city center, developers could select land that lay beyond jurisdictional boundaries, embodied desirable topographical features, or fulfilled the "rural ideal" which was becoming increasingly attractive to urban Americans.2 The rural Bethesda District fell within such an extended commuting radius from the city of Washington, and had been skirted by the the county's first major transportational improvement - the Metropolitan Branch of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad completed in 1873.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Northern District of Alabama Northeastern Division
    Case 5:03-cv-01829-CLS Document 62 Filed 06/07/06 Page 1 of 54 FILED 2006 Jun-07 AM 09:51 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION JOHN ROMANO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. CV-03-S-1829-NE ) CHARLES P. SWANSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This diversity action, stating claims for negligence and violation of a bailment agreement allegedly resulting in severe damage to plaintiff’s rare Porsche race car, is before the court following a bench trial. PART ONE Findings of Fact1 Plaintiff, Dr. John Romano, is a resident of the State of Massachusetts and the owner of the 1970 Porsche race car, model 908/3, that is the subject of this litigation. The machine is extraordinarily rare, one of only thirteen constructed, and each hand- made. It was designed to be run in the Targa Floria race held annually on the island of Sicily. Dr. Romano purchased the Porsche (or at least its constituent parts, as the 1The following factual findings are derived from the parties’ statement of agreed facts, as well as from the evidence presented at trial. Case 5:03-cv-01829-CLS Document 62 Filed 06/07/06 Page 2 of 54 automobile was in a very incomplete state) in 1999 for $440,000. He associated Dale Miller, a North Carolina resident and consultant specializing in the restoration of historic automobiles, to coordinate the restoration work.2 By April of 2002, following two-and-a-half years of careful work by restoration specialists, the value of plaintiff’s Porsche had increased to $750,000.3 On the dates of the events leading to this suit, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Echo Park - Then and Now Carousel Was One of the First to Be Sold, but a Fundraising Major Improvements to the Park
    The Bakers then began efforts to transfer some of the Park’s Finally in 1999 the federal, state and county governments attractions to other Rekab, Inc., properties and to sell the jointly funded an eighteen million dollar renovation of the remainder of the rides and attractions. The Dentzel Spanish Ballroom and Arcade buildings as well as many other Glen Echo Park - Then and Now carousel was one of the first to be sold, but a fundraising major improvements to the park. drive organized by Glen Echo Town councilwoman Nancy Long, provided money to buy back the Park’s beloved In 2000, the National Park Service entered into a cooperative carousel. agreement with Montgomery County government to manage the park’s programs. Montgomery County set up a non-profit organization called the Glen Echo Park Partnership for Arts and Culture, Inc. The Partnership is charged with managing and maintaining Park facilities, managing the artist-in- residence, education and social dance programs, fundraising and marketing. The National Park Service is responsible for historical interpretation, safety, security, resource protection and grounds maintenance. Glen Echo Park Today For well over one hundred years Glen Echo Park has been delighting the people who come to study, to play, and to enjoy the park’s own special charms. Let’s stroll through Glen Echo Park’s memories, and then see what the Park is offering you, your family, and your neighbors d Glen Echo Park retains many of its old treasures. The Chautauqua Tower, the Yellow Barn, the Dentzel Carousel, Glen Echo was chosen as the assembly site by the recently the Bumper Car Pavilion, the Spanish Ballroom, the Arcade formed Chautauqua Union of Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned Am Usem Ent Parks
    Abandoned Amusement Parks There is something both sad and creepy about an abandoned amusement park. Perhaps it’s because a place that was once packed with fun seekers has become slowly choked with weeds. Or maybe it’s because the sound of children’s excited laughter has been replaced with the quiet creaking of rusted rides. When the only visitors are the spirits of those who died there many years ago, an amusement park can be a very scary place to visit. Within the 11 amusement parks in this book, you will discover a roller coaster Williams left to rot after nearly killing its passengers, deserted rides that are now home to alligators and snakes, and the ghost of a man who is still trying to ride a Ferris wheel that stopped working years ago. Abandoned Amusement Parks Ghost Towns Mummy Lairs Abandoned Insane Asylums Haunted Caves Shuttered Horror Hospitals Creepy Castles Haunted Hotels Spooky Cemeteries Creepy Stations Haunted Houses Spooky Schools Cursed Grounds Lost Cities Tragic Theaters Dark Labyrinths Monstrous Morgues Wretched Ruins of the Past Dark Mansions by Dinah Williams [ Intentionally Left Blank ] by Dinah Williams Consultant: Paul F. Johnston, PhD Washington, D.C. Credits Cover and Title Page, © Estelle/Shutterstock, © Lisa F. Young/Shutterstock, and © Arvind Balaraman/Shutterstock; 4–5, Kim Jones; 6, © From the collections of the Omaha Public Library; 7, Courtesy of Douglas County (NE) Historical Society Archives; 8T, Courtesy of Jeffrey Stanton; 8B, Courtesy of Jeffrey Stanton; 9, © Los Angeles Public Library Photo Collection; 10, © 2011 Elyse Pasquale; 11, © Efrem Lukatsky/Associated Press; 12, © Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation of a Portion of the San Pedro Acequia (41BX337) Via Metropolitan Transit System Parking Lot, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas
    Volume 1993 Article 3 1993 Excavation of a Portion of the San Pedro Acequia (41BX337) via Metropolitan Transit System Parking Lot, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas I. Waynne Cox Center for Archaeological Research Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Cox, I. Waynne (1993) "Excavation of a Portion of the San Pedro Acequia (41BX337) via Metropolitan Transit System Parking Lot, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 1993, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.1993.1.3 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1993/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Excavation of a Portion of the San Pedro Acequia (41BX337) via Metropolitan Transit System Parking Lot, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1993/iss1/3 EXCAVATION OF A PORTION OF THE SAN PEDRO ACEQUIA (41 BX 337) VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM PARKING LOT, SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnival Park Was Once a Bright and Shining Spot
    Kansas City Kansan, June 30, 1985: p 2A Carnival Park was once a bright and shining spot (Editor's note: This is the 13th in a series of "then and now" articles on places and things of interest in Kansas City, Kan., compiled by area historian Margaret Landis in observance of the 100th birthday A night scene at Carnival Park (top) of KCK in 1986. Much of the information has shows the tower that dominated the appeared in past editions of The Kansan.) amusement park that was located on the grounds of the current Ward High School Athletic Field (bottom). The (Transcriptions are presented without changes chute-the-chutes riding device (the chutes led from the tower) is one of the except to improve readability.) best remembered segments of the park. Carnival Park was described as one of the city's greatest achievements. Located between 14th and 16th streets on Armstrong Avenue to Barnett Avenue (the current Ward High School athletic field), the park opened May 7, 1907. It ran for about two years as Carnival Park and was then leased to a carnival for another two years. The demise of the park is one of the cities biggest mysteries. No one seems to know exactly what happened to it and why it failed, but, according to the Kansas City Gazette Globe, the last scheduled (?) was Oct. 9, 1911, for the Knights of Columbus. The Carnival Park Company was incorporated for $ 1million. Planners announced it "would be equal in area to the White City in Chicago and that it would be larger than any amusement park in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Tricentennial Chronology and the Founding Events in the History of San Antonio and Bexar County
    Tricentennial Chronology And The Founding Events In The History of San Antonio And Bexar County by Robert Garcia Jr. Hector J. Cardenas and Dr. Amy Jo Baker San Antonio, Texas March 2018 i i Tricentennial Chronology And The Founding Events In The History of San Antonio And Bexar County By Robert Garcia Jr. Hector J. Cardenas and Dr. Amy Jo Baker Published by Paso de la Conquista San Antonio, Texas Mar. 2018 i Library of Congress Control Number: 2018934169 Published: Feb, 2018 San Antonio, Texas Copyright Pending. Outside Cover of Mission San José: public domain ii Introduction In 2015, San Antonio’s Tricentennial Commission created the opportunity for the citizens of San Antonio to rediscover their shared cultural heritage, history and to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the founding of our beloved City in 1718. Collaboratives were formed with public institutions to further develop presentations commemorating our City’s history. Many months were spent on these projects and in the year 2018, they will be presented to the public in open venues. An out-come of this year’s celebration is this publication, “Tricentennial Chronology and The Founding Events In The History of San Antonio And Bexar County”. The last published chronology of San Antonio was in 1950 by Edward Hunsinger. For this new study, approximately 1½ years was spent developing additional details and entries of events in San Antonio’s 300-year history. Other chronologies were studied, books were referenced and honored historians were consulted. Every attempt was made to edit and re-edit the many editions of the chronology until this latest edition is being published.
    [Show full text]
  • Buildings 1. Alice French Home, “Thanford”
    Photograph Collection 7 – Buildings 1. Alice French Home, “Thanford” - Clover Bend, 4. Loa Home, Clover Bend, Lawrence County, Ark. Lawrence County, Ark. c.1978. (5" x 7"). Donor: Tom W. c.1890. (5" x 7"). NEGATIVE. Photographer: Alice Dillard. French. Donor: T.W.D. 5. Unidentified House, Lawrence County, Ark. c.1890. (3 2. Alice French Home, Clover Bend, Lawrence County, 1/2" x 5"). NEGATIVE. Photographer: Alice French. Ark. c.1890. (3 1/2" x 5"). NEGATIVE. Photographer: Donor: T.W.D. Alice French. Donor: T.W.D. 3. Alice French Home, Clover Bend, Lawrence County, Ark. c.1890. (3 1/2" x 5"). NEGATIVE. Photographer: Alice French. Donor: T.W.D. 6. Wolf House, Norfork, Baxter County, Ark. c.1970. (5" x 7"). Donor: T.W.D. Photograph Collection 7 – Buildings 7. Wolf House, Norfork, Baxter County, Ark. c.1970. (5" 10. H. F. Auten Home, Elm Street, Pulaski Heights, x 7"). Donor: T.W.D. Pulaski County, Ark. c.1907. (3 1/2" x 5"). NEGATIVE. Donor: T.W.D. 8. Wolf House, Norfork, Baxter County, Ark. c.1970. (5" x 7"). Donor: T.W.D. 11. H. F. Auten Home, Elm Street, Pulaski Heights, Pulaski County, Ark. c.1907. (3 1/2" x 5"). NEGATIVE. Donor: T.W.D. 9. Retan Home, Pulaski Heights, Pulaski County, Ark. 1907. (3 1/2" x 5"). NEGATIVE. Donor: T.W.D. 12. Potts Tavern, Pottsville, Pope County, Ark. 1973. (9 1/2"x 7 1/2"). Photographer: Bob Dunn. Donor: T.W.D. Photograph Collection 7 – Buildings 13. McHenry House, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Ark.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges, Trestles & Aqueducts
    INVENTORY OF ENGINEERING & INDUSTRIAL PROJECT (1980) Cabinet #1 Drawer #1 Irrigation Tieton, Wapato Project, Roza, Wenatchee, Other Water Systems, Storage, Yakima/Sunnyside Cabinet #1 Drawers #2 & 3 Bridges, Trestles & Aqueducts Inventories by County Cabinet #1 Drawer #3 Bridges, Trestles & Aqueducts Working Papers Cabinet #1 Drawer #4 Bridges, Trestles & Aqueducts Nomination Bridges/Tunnels # 1 - 89 Cabinet #2 Drawers #1 - 3 Specialized Structures (Industrial) Inventory by County Cabinet # 2 – Drawer # 3 Specialized Structures (Industrial) Working Papers Cabinet # 2 – Drawer # 4 Power Plants and Dams ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HAER – Engineering & Industrial Structures Classification 1 CABINET # 1 - DRAWER # 1 Irrigation Tieton Folder #01 Tieton Irrigation System Bureau of Reclamation History, Library, Yakima Office, Vol. IV, Tieton Unit, pp. 1 – 24. Photos (photocopies): Valley Division – Tieton Unit – 1909-1912, 1907-1916 (BofR files) Tieton Irrigation System / Concrete Canal; Tunnel - Mounted photographic proof prints Tieton Irrigation System /Distribution Systems - Mounted photographic proof prints Tieton Irrigation System / Headgates - Mounted photographic proof prints Folder #02 USBR – Yakima District – History of the Tieton Unit 1902 – 1913 Volume IV Part I – Yakima Project Folder #03 Yakima – Tieton Request of DOE – Tieton Division, Tieton Dam, and Clear Creek Dam of the Storage Division of the Yakima Project Photocopied excerpts from various journals, reports, and histories (U of W & Ellensburg Library) Annual Report, U.S. Indian Irrigation Service (1928) Irrigation Practice and Engineering – Volume II: Conveyance of Water”, pp. 168-171; Chapter VIII – p. 173 - 181 J.S.C. 2-9-10 “ History of Principal Features – Tieton Unit. III to VII Working papers Folder #04 Tieton HAER Inventory form (copy) – Tieton Main Canal “The Tieton Main Canal After Fifty Yeas of Use and Recollections of Conditions At The Time of Its Construction” by S.T.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NP$ Form 10-900 .OMS No. 1024.{)()18 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the Nationaf Regisler of Historic Places Regisfrafion Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x· in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural dassification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property Historic name HOQUIAM OLYMPIC STADIUM Other names/site number 2. Location street & number :...:2:...:8:...:1:...:1-'C=h:.::e"'rr:....y-""S.:.:tr:.::e:.::e"'t not for publication city or town H_O-'9...u_i_a_ffi vicinity State Washington code WA county GraysHarbor code 027 zip code 98550 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ..! nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of HlslPric Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property A meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significantXnationally '""":'""statewide _ locally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alumni Mentor
    Manhattan, KS 66505-1102 PO Box 1102 MHS Alumni Association The Alumni Mentor Volume 4 Summer 00 Number 1 2008 Wall of Fame January 2009 Annual Dinner, Reception, Induction Ceremony Meeting Sept 14 Election of offi cers for 2010-2012 articipation is the key to fullest success! PMembers are encouraged to come and enjoy free hotdogs, brats and tacos at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Manhattan High School Alumni Association, Monday, Above: Mike Silva. MHS ‘74 , center, and classmates Sept. 14th at the American Legion Hall in Manhattan. A social hour starts at 6:00pm, with the Annual Business meeting gavelled to order at 7:00pm. This is an election year for MHSAA. Charlie Hostetler ‘56, chairman of the Nominating Committee, will present a suggested Slate of Offi cers and Directors (who jointly make up the MHSAA Board all of Fame 2008 Honorees of Directors) to the membership for the WGen. Michael J. Silva, MHS 2010/2012 term. Nominations may also be 1974, Dean Thomas Romig ‘66, Earl entered from the fl oor. Woods, MHS 1949 and Clementine The current Board will be available Paddleford, MHS 1917 were to report and talk with everyone. The business celebrated by families, friends, and meeting will also include reports to the classmates who all enjoyed multiple membership by each Committee Chair. Tom Romig ‘66 , MHSAA Pres. Dave Fiser ‘57 and continued on page 4 MHS Principal Terry McCarty , at Induction Ceremony Manhattan with MHSAA providing the Topeka High. We will be furnishing hotdogs, President’s hamburgers and hotdogs grilled by our cookies and refreshments at the south end of own Events Chairman Keith Eyestone.
    [Show full text]
  • FUN PROJECT NO. 4 Tiny Homes
    5 FUN PROJECTS IN KANSAS CITY RIGHT UNDER YOUR NOSE AND AT YOUR FEET Steff Hedenkamp President + Founder Red Quill Communicaons, Inc. WBE Cerfied Who IS Steff Hedenkamp? • Writer, editor, strategic communicaons pro • Working on many incredible iniaves • Serving many amazing clients • Intrinsic partner + connector • Wearing lots of hats + foster forward moon • Providing valuable creavity + crical insight • Working with clients at inflecon points • Communicaons + strengthening business What ARE the 5 Fun Projects? Kansas City Kessler Park Electric Park Tiny Homes The McFadden Museum Improvements in the Veterans Brothers Restoraon East Booms Village 18th and Vine Experience FUN PROJECT NO. 1 The Kansas City Museum Restoraon Project • Anna Marie Tutera • Internaonal Architects Atelier (IAA) • Restoring the Museum • Honoring the Planning • Building Capacity • Defining clearly the museum’s role and impact in the redevelopment and revitalizaon of the Historic Northeast area and Kansas City FUN PROJECT NO. 1 The Kansas City Museum Restoraon Project This is a mul-phase, mul-year project. Early 2017 construcon start on the lower level and first floor of the mansion. Museum will connue to collect, preserve, and interpret Kansas City's local and regional history through exhibions, programs, and events, that illuminate and celebrate Kansas City's past, Phases of Design: present, and future. • Discovery Phase Museum to serve as City's • Master Planning official venue for the Mayor. • Design Development + Construcon Documents FUN PROJECT NO. 1 The Kansas City Museum Restoraon Project Previous work at the museum since 2006: • Masonry Restoraon and Roof Replacement of Corinthian Hall (2006) • Door and Window Replacement at Corinthian Hall and Carriage House (2008) • New HVAC at Corinthian Hall and Carriage House (2010) FUN PROJECT NO.
    [Show full text]