DOCSLIB.ORG

Chadsimmons2021.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chadsimmons2021.Pdf IDENTIFYING BROAD-SCALE ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS OF ANEMONE AMERICANA, CONOPHOLIS AMERICANA AND GOODYERA PUBESCENS IN NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA by Chad Roderick Simmons Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia March 2021 © Copyright by Chad Roderick Simmons, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 Temperate Forests and Their Understory ........................................................................ 1 Study Area ....................................................................................................................... 4 Plant Communities of Nova Scotia .................................................................................. 6 Research Objectives ......................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 2 METHODS ................................................................................................. 9 Target Species Selection .................................................................................................. 9 Target Species Background ............................................................................................. 9 Target Species Site Selection ........................................................................................ 10 Control Site Selection .................................................................................................... 11 Field Sampling ............................................................................................................... 13 Nova Scotia Forest Ecosystem Classification ............................................................... 17 Data Transformation ...................................................................................................... 17 Software ......................................................................................................................... 17 Statistical Analysis......................................................................................................... 18 CHAPTER 3 RESULTS ................................................................................................. 21 Control Sites .................................................................................................................. 21 Conopholis americana ................................................................................................... 23 Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling ....................................................................... 23 Contingency Table Chi-squared ................................................................................. 23 Principal Component Analysis ................................................................................... 24 Generalized Linear Model ......................................................................................... 24 Goodyera pubescens ...................................................................................................... 30 Non-Metric Multidimensional scaling ....................................................................... 30 Contingency Table Chi-squared ................................................................................. 30 ii Principal Component Analysis ................................................................................... 31 Generalized Linear Model ......................................................................................... 31 Anemone americana ...................................................................................................... 37 Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling ....................................................................... 37 Contingency Table Chi-squared ................................................................................. 37 Principal Component Analysis ................................................................................... 38 Generalized Linear Model ......................................................................................... 38 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................... 44 Forest Vegetation ........................................................................................................... 44 Conopholis americana ................................................................................................... 44 Limitations with Research on Conopholis americana ............................................... 46 Goodyera pubescens ...................................................................................................... 46 Anemone americana ...................................................................................................... 49 Limitations with Research on Anemone americana ................................................... 51 Control Sites .................................................................................................................. 52 Mechanisms of Plant Rarity and Connections to Target Species .................................. 52 Rare Plant Conservation ................................................................................................ 54 Project Limitations and Future Work ............................................................................ 55 Research Importance ..................................................................................................... 57 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 58 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 59 APPENDIX 1 IMAGES OF ANEMONE AMERICANA (A), CONOPHOLIS AMERICANA (B) AND GOODYERA PUBESCENS (C) ..................................................................................................................................... 78 APPENDIX 2.1 PEARSON’S CORRELATION MATRIX FOR CONOPHOLIS AMERICANA ENVIRONMENTAL VARAIBLES (N=29) ............................................................................................................................... 79 APPENDIX 2.2 PEARSON’S CORRELATION MATRIX FOR GOODYERA PUBESCENS ENVIRONMENTAL VARAIBLES (N=30) ............................................................................................................................... 80 APPENDIX 2.3 PEARSON’S CORRELATION MATRIX FOR ANEMONE AMERICANA ENVIRONMENTAL VARAIBLES (N=30) ............................................................................................................................... 80 iii APPENDIX 3.1 PLOT OF RESIDUALS FOR CONOPHOLIS AMERICANA ENVIRONMENTAL VARAIBLES ..................................................... 81 APPENDIX 3.2 PLOT OF RESIDUALS FOR GOODYERA PUBESCENS ENVIRONMENTAL VARAIBLES ..................................................... 82 APPENDIX 3.3 PLOT OF RESIDUALS FOR ANEMONE AMERICANA ENVIRONMENTAL VARAIBLES ..................................................... 83 APPENDIX 4.1 CANOPY PLANT COMMUNITY COMPOSITION IN TARGET SPECIES AND CONTROL SITES ......................... 85 APPENDIX 4.2 SUBCANOPY PLANT COMMUNITY COMPOSITION IN TARGET SPECIES AND CONTROL SITES ......................... 87 APPENDIX 4.3 SHRUB PLANT COMMUNITY COMPOSITION IN TARGET SPECIES AND CONTROL SITES ....................................................... 89 APPENDIX 4.4 HERB PLANT COMMUNITY COMPOSITION IN TARGET SPECIES AND CONTROL SITES ....................................................... 91 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1 An outline of the sampling variables, their definition, units and the tools used to record them. ............................................................................................ 15 Table 2 Generalized linear model (GLM) omnibus test results, test of model effects and parameter estimates of environmental variables from control sites (n=15) and Conopholis americana sites (n=14). ........................................ 29 Table 3 Generalized linear model (GLM) omnibus test results, test of model effects and parameter estimates of environmental variables from control sites (n=15) and Goodyera pubescens sites (n=15). ........................................... 36 Table 4 Generalized linear model (GLM) omnibus test results, test of model effects and parameter estimates of environmental variables from control sites (n=15) and Anemone americana sites (n=15). ............................................ 43 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Sampled control, Anemone americana, Conopholis americana and Goodyera pubescens sites in Nova Scotia, Canada (2019). ............................... 12 Figure 2 Proportion of control sites in categories of soil texture class (A), soil fertility class (B), forest vegetation group (C) and successional stage (D) (n=15). All control sites were in Southwest Nova Scotia. ..........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Application for Phylogenetic Marker Development Using Angiosperm Transcriptomes Author(S): Srikar Chamala, Nicolás García, Grant T
    MarkerMiner 1.0: A New Application for Phylogenetic Marker Development Using Angiosperm Transcriptomes Author(s): Srikar Chamala, Nicolás García, Grant T. Godden, Vivek Krishnakumar, Ingrid E. Jordon- Thaden, Riet De Smet, W. Brad Barbazuk, Douglas E. Soltis, and Pamela S. Soltis Source: Applications in Plant Sciences, 3(4) Published By: Botanical Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400115 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3732/apps.1400115 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. ApApplicatitionsons Applications in Plant Sciences 2015 3 ( 4 ): 1400115 inin PlPlant ScienSciencesces S OFTWARE NOTE M ARKERMINER 1.0: A NEW APPLICATION FOR PHYLOGENETIC 1 MARKER DEVELOPMENT USING ANGIOSPERM TRANSCRIPTOMES S RIKAR C HAMALA 2,12 , N ICOLÁS G ARCÍA 2,3,4 * , GRANT T . G ODDEN 2,3,5 * , V IVEK K RISHNAKUMAR 6 , I NGRID E.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensive Plastome Reduction and Loss of Photosynthesis Genes in Diphelypaea Coccinea, a Holoparasitic Plant of the Family Orobanchaceae
    Extensive plastome reduction and loss of photosynthesis genes in Diphelypaea coccinea, a holoparasitic plant of the family Orobanchaceae Eugeny V. Gruzdev1,2, Vitaly V. Kadnikov1, Alexey V. Beletsky1, Andrey V. Mardanov1 and Nikolai V. Ravin1,2 1 Institute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT Background. Parasitic plants have the ability to obtain nutrients from their hosts and are less dependent on their own photosynthesis or completely lose this capacity. The reduction in plastid genome size and gene content in parasitic plants predominantly results from loss of photosynthetic genes. Plants from the family Orobanchaceae are used as models for studying plastid genome evolution in the transition from an autotrophic to parasitic lifestyle. Diphelypaea is a poorly studied genus of the Orobanchaceae, comprising two species of non-photosynthetic root holoparasites. In this study, we sequenced the plastid genome of Diphelypaea coccinea and compared it with other Orobanchaceae, to elucidate patterns of plastid genome evolution. In addition, we used plastid genome data to define the phylogenetic position of Diphelypaea spp. Methods. The complete nucleotide sequence of the plastid genome of D. coccinea was obtained from total plant DNA, using pyrosequencing technology. Results. The D. coccinea plastome is only 66,616 bp in length, and is highly rearranged; however, it retains a quadripartite structure. It contains only four rRNA genes, 25 tRNA genes and 25 protein-coding genes, being one of the most highly reduced plastomes Submitted 16 May 2019 among the parasitic Orobanchaceae. All genes related to photosynthesis, including the Accepted 4 September 2019 Published 2 October 2019 ATP synthase genes, had been lost, whereas most housekeeping genes remain intact.
    [Show full text]
  • Invisible Connections: Introduction to Parasitic Plants Dr
    Invisible Connections: Introduction to Parasitic Plants Dr. Vanessa Beauchamp Towson University What is a parasite? • An organism that lives in or on an organism of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Symbiosis https://www.superpharmacy.com.au/blog/parasites-protozoa-worms-ectoparasites Food acquisition in plants: Autotrophy Heterotrophs (“different feeding”) • True parasites: obtain carbon compounds from host plants through haustoria. • Myco-heterotrophs: obtain carbon compounds from host plants via Image Credit: Flickr User wackybadger, via CC mycorrhizal fungal connection. • Carnivorous plants (not parasitic): obtain nutrients (phosphorus, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pin nitrogen) from trapped insects. k_indian_pipes.jpg http://www.welivealot.com/venus-flytrap- facts-for-kids/ Parasite vs. Epiphyte https://chatham.ces.ncsu.edu/2014/12/does-mistletoe-harm-trees-2/ By © Hans Hillewaert /, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6289695 True Parasitic Plants • Gains all or part of its nutrition from another plant (the host). • Does not contribute to the benefit of the host and, in some cases, causing extreme damage to the host. • Specialized peg-like root (haustorium) to penetrate host plants. https://www.britannica.com/plant/parasitic-plant https://chatham.ces.ncsu.edu/2014/12/does-mistletoe-harm-trees-2/ Diversity of parasitic plants Eudicots • Parasitism has evolved independently at least 12 times within the plant kingdom. • Approximately 4,500 parasitic species in Monocots 28 families. • Found in eudicots and basal angiosperms • 1% of the dicot angiosperm species • No monocot angiosperm species Basal angiosperms Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016.67:643-667 True Parasitic Plants https://www.alamy.com/parasitic-dodder-plant-cuscuta-showing-penetration-parasitic-haustor The defining structural feature of a parasitic plant is the haustorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Infection by Parasitic Weeds: a Review
    plants Review Management of Infection by Parasitic Weeds: A Review Mónica Fernández-Aparicio 1,*, Philippe Delavault 2 and Michael P. Timko 3 1 Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain 2 Laboratory of Plant Biology and Pathology, University of Nantes, 44035 Nantes, France; [email protected] 3 Department of Biology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4328, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 July 2020; Accepted: 9 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: Parasitic plants rely on neighboring host plants to complete their life cycle, forming vascular connections through which they withdraw needed nutritive resources. In natural ecosystems, parasitic plants form one component of the plant community and parasitism contributes to overall community balance. In contrast, when parasitic plants become established in low biodiversified agroecosystems, their persistence causes tremendous yield losses rendering agricultural lands uncultivable. The control of parasitic weeds is challenging because there are few sources of crop resistance and it is difficult to apply controlling methods selective enough to kill the weeds without damaging the crop to which they are physically and biochemically attached. The management of parasitic weeds is also hindered by their high fecundity, dispersal efficiency, persistent seedbank, and rapid responses to changes in agricultural practices, which allow them to adapt to new hosts and manifest increased aggressiveness against new resistant cultivars. New understanding of the physiological and molecular mechanisms behind the processes of germination and haustorium development, and behind the crop resistant response, in addition to the discovery of new targets for herbicides and bioherbicides will guide researchers on the design of modern agricultural strategies for more effective, durable, and health compatible parasitic weed control.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Asterids!
    Diversity and Evolution of Asterids! . mints and snapdragons . ! *Boraginaceae - borage family! Widely distributed, large family of alternate leaved plants. Typically hairy. Typically possess helicoid or scorpiod cymes = compound monochasium. Many are poisonous or used medicinally. Mertensia virginica - Eastern bluebells *Boraginaceae - borage family! CA (5) CO (5) A 5 G (2) Gynobasic style; not terminal style which is usual in plants; this feature is shared with the mint family (Lamiaceae) which is not related Myosotis - forget me not 2 carpels each with 2 ovules are separated at maturity and each further separated into 1 ovuled compartments Fruit typically 4 nutlets *Boraginaceae - borage family! Echium vulgare Blueweed, viper’s bugloss adventive *Boraginaceae - borage family! Hackelia virginiana Beggar’s-lice Myosotis scorpioides Common forget-me-not *Boraginaceae - borage family! Lithospermum canescens Lithospermum incisium Hoary puccoon Fringed puccoon *Boraginaceae - borage family! pin thrum Lithospermum canescens • Lithospermum (puccoon) - classic Hoary puccoon dimorphic heterostyly *Boraginaceae - borage family! Mertensia virginica Eastern bluebells Botany 401 final field exam plant! *Boraginaceae - borage family! Leaves compound or lobed and “water-marked” Hydrophyllum virginianum - Common waterleaf Botany 401 final field exam plant! **Oleaceae - olive family! CA (4) CO (4) or 0 A 2 G (2) • Woody plants, opposite leaves • 4 merous actinomorphic or regular flowers Syringa vulgaris - Lilac cultivated **Oleaceae - olive family! CA (4)
    [Show full text]
  • Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers
    Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vascular Flora Inventory
    A Vascular Flora Inventory Ottawa Sands Ottawa County Parks, Michigan September 2020 Prepared by William Martinus & Associates Financial assistance for this project was provided, in part, by the Coastal Management Program, Water Resources Division, Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, under the National Coastal Zone Management program, through a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are those of the Ottawa County Parks & Recreation Commission and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Purpose 3 II. Overview 3 III. Plant Communities 4 IV. Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species 5 V. Species Lists 7 VI. References 21 2 I. Introduction and Purpose Ottawa Sands, Ottawa County Parks, consists of 345 acres including an 80-acre inland lake, natural forests, coastal dunes, intermittent wetlands, inundated shrub swamp, and riparian marsh, shrub, and swamp communities. The eleven natural plant communities occurring on the site are listed along with hundreds of associated plant and animal species. - Ottawa Sands is located near the mouth of the Grand River in sections 17, 18 and 20 of Spring Lake Township, Ottawa County, in Western Michigan. - Property includes 5,585 feet of Grand River frontage. - A Floristic Quality Assessment demonstrates that a diverse and extremely high-quality plant component exists at Ottawa Sands. Purpose - To gain an understanding of the vegetative plant communities and flora of western Ottawa County and central west Michigan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Root Parasites of Southern Forests
    Summary The five families of root parasites of the South are discussed relative to selection of hosts, ecology, and potential for damage to commercial species. An identification key to all genera of root parasites is included. Plants and flowers of 29 species are illustrated and their distribution in the South mapped. Acknowledgments We wish to thank Dr. W. H. Duncan, Dr. R. Teulings, and Mr C. S. Hanis for contributing pictures. Much credit for the successful growth of parasites in pot culture goes to Mr. C. M. Stangle. Dr. R. E. Eplee, and Dr. I? R. Atsatt reviewed drafts and made helpful suggestions. Finally, Harold Grelen contributed in many ways including substantial improvements in the identification key. Disclaimer If herbicides are handled, applied, or disposed of improperly, they may be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and pollinating insects, fish, or other wildlife, and may contaminate water supplies. Use herbicides only when needed and handle them with care. Follow the directions and heed all precautions on the container label. - Lytton J. Musselman Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va. William F. Mann, Jr. Chief Silviculturist, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicf Southern Forest Experiment Station, Alexandria, La. Published by the Southern Forest Experiment Station Southeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Contents Foreword ............................................... 4 Identification
    [Show full text]
  • Orobanche Sl, Orobanchaceae
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 75: 107–118Resurrection (2016) of the genus Aphyllon for New World broomrapes... 107 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.75.10473 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Resurrection of the genus Aphyllon for New World broomrapes (Orobanche s.l., Orobanchaceae) Adam C. Schneider1 1 Jepson Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2465 Corresponding author: Adam C. Schneider ([email protected]) Academic editor: E. Fischer | Received 12 September 2016 | Accepted 28 November 2016 | Published 9 December 2016 Citation: Schneider AC (2016) Resurrection of the genus Aphyllon for New World broomrapes (Orobanche s.l., Orobanchaceae). PhytoKeys 75: 107–118. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.75.10473 Abstract Recent phylogenetic studies support a monophyletic clade of New World broomrapes (Orobanche sects. Gymnocaulis and Nothaphyllon) sister to the Old World genus Phelipanche. I place the New World taxa in the genus Aphyllon, propose 21 new combinations, and provide a list of currently accepted taxa. Keywords Aphyllon, broomrape, Gymnocaulis, Myzorrhiza, Nothaphyllon, nomenclature, Orobanche, Orobanchaceae Introduction Phylogenetic analysis of broomrapes and related holoparasites using nuclear DNA have found that the small eastern Mediterranean genus Diphelypaea Nicolson is nested within Orobanche sensu lato (s.l.) as circumscribed by Beck (1890) (Schneeweiss et al. 2004a). Morphological and cytological differences between groups of taxa within Orobanche s.l. have led some botanists to adopt a narrower generic circumscription. In this taxonomic concept, Orobanche sensu stricto is limited to Old World species that lack bracteoles and have a base chromosome number of x = 19, a calyx divided to the base, and generally unbranched stems (Holub 1977, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region
    Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (VERSION 3) NEIL SNOW Herbarium Pacificum Bernice P. Bishop Museum 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, HI 96817 [email protected] Suggested citation: Snow, N. 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (Version 3). 316 pp. Retrievable from the Colorado Native Plant Society (http://www.conps.org/plant_lists.html). The author retains the rights irrespective of its electronic posting. Please circulate freely. 1 Snow, N. January 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region. (Version 3). Dedication To all who work on behalf of the conservation of species and ecosystems. Abbreviated Table of Contents Fern Allies and Ferns.........................................................................................................12 Gymnopserms ....................................................................................................................19 Angiosperms ......................................................................................................................21 Amaranthaceae ............................................................................................................23 Apiaceae ......................................................................................................................31 Asteraceae....................................................................................................................38 Boraginaceae ...............................................................................................................98
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary List of Species Native Within the Adirondack Park Listed Alphabetically by Common Name and Sorted by Habit V.1 Updated 10.23.2006
    Preliminary List of Species Native Within the Adirondack Park Listed Alphabetically by Common Name and Sorted by Habit v.1 Updated 10.23.2006 Purpose The purpose of this list is to provide an information resource to those wishing to plant or otherwise propagate plants native to the Adirondack Park. It could be used by an individual or a group developing a landscaping plan and wishing to use species native to the Park and a particular county. They could use the list as a source of native species and request nurserymen to provide plant materials from it. Although most of these species are not now available from commercial nurseries, it may be that if continued requests are made for them, the nursery industry would see fit to propagate the desired plants. Requesting and planting natives would reduce the call for non-native and potentially invasive species. It should be noted that some of these species will most likely never be sold commercially because of rarity or difficulty in propagation. The list is meant to being a living document with species added and deleted as additional information is collected and verified. Although it may be tempting, plants should never be harvested from the wild. In fact some of these plants are legally protected, and no harvesting can occur on State lands. Refer to the New York Natural Heritage Program website (http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/dfwmr/heritage/plants.htm) for a complete treatment of New York State protected plants and federal and State laws regarding rare plants. Source The source of this list is the New York Flora Atlas produced by the New York Flora Association and available online at http://atlas.nyflora.org .
    [Show full text]
  • CHINQUAPIN the Newsletter of the Southern Appalachian Botanical Society
    CHINQUAPIN The Newsletter of the Southern appalachian Botanical Society Volume 20 (2) Spring 2012 Bear Corn, Conopholis americana Lytton John Musselman, Old Dominion University Bear with me when I say that there is little in the taste of this plant to commend it to humans, however. It is extremely bitter, due This is the time of year (mid-May to mid-June) when this fas- I suspect, to the accumulation of tannins from its oak host. cinating parasitic plant flowers across much of the Eastern United I have found Bear Corn only on the roots of oaks (species of the States. The yellowish flowering stalks are not true stems. Members genus Quercus) but other hosts have been reported; host identifica- of this group do not have true stems because they lack true leaves tion is only possible by excavation, not inferred by proximity. And which in turn reflects their lack of chlorophyll—this reduction is unlike the other native holoparasitic members of the family (Oro- just one of the many features of economy of plant parts in these banche uniflora, Epifagus virginiana) Bear Corn is perennial from a parasites. All aspects of nutrition are underground, unseen. It is a knobby tubercle on the host root. (Interestingly, molecular studies holoparasite that means it lacks chlorophyll and is entirely depen- have shown a close relationship between Conopholis and Epifagus, dent upon its host. But when it comes to sex, Conopholis is tradi- a relationship that could not easily have been predicted based on tional and bears white to light yellow two-lipped flowers.
    [Show full text]