DOCSLIB.ORG

The Morphology and Evolution of Chondrichthyan Cranial Muscles: A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The morphology and evolution of chondrichthyan cranial muscles: A digital dissection of the elephantfish Callorhinchus milii and the catshark Scyliorhinus canicula Richard Dearden, Rohan Mansuit, Antoine Cuckovic, Anthony Herrel, Dominique Didier, Paul Tafforeau, Alan Pradel To cite this version: Richard Dearden, Rohan Mansuit, Antoine Cuckovic, Anthony Herrel, Dominique Didier, et al.. The morphology and evolution of chondrichthyan cranial muscles: A digital dissection of the elephantfish Callorhinchus milii and the catshark Scyliorhinus canicula. Journal of Anatomy, Wiley, In press, 10.1111/joa.13362. hal-03103769 HAL Id: hal-03103769 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03103769 Submitted on 8 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.30.227132; this version posted July 31, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 The morphology and evolution of chondrichthyan cranial muscles: a 2 digital dissection of the elephantfish Callorhinchus milii and the 3 catshark Scyliorhinus canicula. 4 Running title: Cranial muscles of Callorhinchus and Scyliorhinus 5 Richard P. Dearden1, Rohan Mansuit1,2, Antoine Cuckovic3, Anthony Herrel2, Dominique Didier4, 6 Paul Tafforeau5, Alan Pradel1 7 8 1 CR2P, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie–Paris, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 9 Sorbonne Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CP 38, 57 rue Cuvier, F75231 10 Paris cedex 05, France. 11 2 UMR 7179 (MNHN-CNRS) MECADEV, Département Adaptations du Vivant, Muséum National 12 d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France 13 3 Université Paris Saclay, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France 14 4Department of Biology, Millersville University, Millersville, PA 17551, USA 15 5 European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France 16 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.30.227132; this version posted July 31, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 17 Abstract 18 The anatomy of sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans) is crucial to understanding the 19 evolution of the cranial system in vertebrates, due to their position as the sister group to bony fishes 20 (osteichthyans). Strikingly different arrangements of the head in the two constituent chondrichthyan 21 groups – holocephalans and elasmobranchs – have played a pivotal role in the formation of 22 evolutionary hypotheses targeting major cranial structures such as the jaws and pharynx. However, 23 despite the advent of digital dissections as a means of easily visualizing and sharing the results of 24 anatomical studies in three dimensions, information on the musculoskeletal systems of the 25 chondrichthyan head remains largely limited to traditional accounts, many of which are at least a 26 century old. Here we use synchrotron tomography acquire 3D data which we used to carry out a 27 digital dissection of a holocephalan and an elasmobranch widely used as model species: the 28 elephantfish, Callorhinchus milii, and the small-spotted catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula. We 29 describe and figure the skeletal anatomy of the head, labial, mandibular, hyoid, and branchial 30 cartilages in both taxa as well as the muscles of the head and pharynx. We make new observations, 31 particularly regarding the branchial musculature of Callorhinchus, revealing several previously 32 unreported or previously ambiguous structures. Finally, we review what is known about the 33 evolution of chondrichthyan cranial muscles from their fossil record and discuss the implications 34 for muscle homology and evolution, broadly concluding that the holocephalan pharynx is likely 35 derived from a more elasmobranch-like form. This dataset has great potential as a resource, 36 particularly for researchers using these model species for zoological research, functional 37 morphologists requiring models of musculature and skeletons, as well as for palaeontologists 38 seeking comparative models for extinct taxa. 39 Keywords (English): digital dissection, cranial muscles, holocephalan, elasmobranch, 40 Callorhinchus milii, Scyliorhinus canicula 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.30.227132; this version posted July 31, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 41 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.30.227132; this version posted July 31, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 42 Introduction 43 Cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichthyes) comprise only a small fraction of total jawed vertebrate 44 diversity (Nelson et al., 2016) but are key to understanding the evolution of jawed vertebrates. As 45 the sister-group to the more diverse and disparate bony fishes (ray-finned fishes, lobe-finned fishes, 46 and tetrapods) their anatomy and physiology provides a valuable outgroup comparison which, 47 probably incorrectly, has often been held to represent “primitive states” for jawed vertebrates as a 48 whole. The greatly divergent cranial morphologies displayed by the two constituent sister groups of 49 Chondrichthyes – elasmobranchs and holocephalans - have themselves led to much debate, both 50 over chondrichthyan origins and those of jawed vertebrates more broadly. For these reasons, 51 anatomists, embryologists, and physiologists have intensively studied chondrichthyan anatomy over 52 the last two centuries. Recently, tomographic methods have allowed the advent of “digital 53 dissections”, where an organism’s anatomy can be non-destructively visualized and communicated 54 in the form of interactive datasets. These studies have run the gamut of mammals (Cox and Faulkes, 55 2014; Sharp and Trusler, 2015), archosaurs (Klinkhamer et al., 2017; Lautenschlager et al., 2014), 56 lissamphibians (Porro and Richards, 2017), and actinopterygians (Brocklehurst et al., 2019). 57 Although aspects of cartilaginous fish anatomy have been examined (Camp et al., 2017; Denton et 58 al., 2018; Tomita et al., 2018), three-dimensional information on the cranial musculoskeletal system 59 is limited. 60 We aim to address this with a digital dissection of the hard tissues and musculature of two 61 representatives of the Chondrichthyes: Callorhinchus milii Bory de Saint-Vincent 1823, a 62 holocephalan, and Scyliorhinus canicula Linnaeus 1758, an elasmobranch. Callorhinchus milii is a 63 callorhinchid, the sister-group to all other holocephalans (Inoue et al., 2010; Licht et al., 2012) and 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.30.227132; this version posted July 31, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 64 historically one of the best known holocephalans due to its being one of only two species to inhabit 65 shallow, nearshore waters (Didier, 1995). As a result, the musculature of the genus has been 66 described several times (Edgeworth, 1935; Kesteven, 1933; Luther, 1909a; Shann, 1919), most 67 recently with Didier (1995) providing a detailed overview of the anatomy and systematics of 68 holocephalans, including Callorhinchus. Scyliorhinus canicula is a scyliorhinid, a carcharhiniform 69 galeomorph elasmobranch. Because of the accessibility of adults, eggs, and embryos to European 70 researchers (it is abundant in nearshore habitats in the northeastern Atlantic) the species has 71 featured heavily in embryological and physiological studies of chondrichthyans (Coolen et al., 72 2008; de Beer, 1931; Hughes and Ballintijn, 1965; Oulion et al., 2011; Reif, 1980). While accounts 73 exist of its gross anatomy (Allis, 1917; Edgeworth, 1935; Luther, 1909b; Nakaya, 1975; Ridewood, 74 1899; Soares and Carvalho, 2013), detailed and fully illustrated accounts are surprisingly rare in 75 comparison to the similarly common Squalus. 76 Here we use a synchrotron tomographic dataset to provide accounts of anatomy of the cartilages 77 and musculature of the head in Callorhinchus milii and Scyliorhinus canicula. We examine 78 dissection-based reports of muscle anatomy in the light of our reconstructed models. By combining 79 this information with what is known about fossil taxa, we assess scenarios of morphological 80 evolution
Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS

    JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS

    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
  • Symmoriiform Sharks from the Pennsylvanian of Nebraska

    Symmoriiform Sharks from the Pennsylvanian of Nebraska

    Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 68 (2018), No. 3, pp. 391–401 DOI: 10.1515/agp-2018-0009 Symmoriiform sharks from the Pennsylvanian of Nebraska MICHAŁ GINTER University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geology, Żwirki i Wigury 93, PL-02-089 Warsaw, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Ginter, M. 2018. Symmoriiform sharks from the Pennsylvanian of Nebraska. Acta Geologica Polonica, 68 (3), 391–401. Warszawa. The Indian Cave Sandstone (Upper Pennsylvanian, Gzhelian) from the area of Peru, Nebraska, USA, has yielded numerous isolated chondrichthyan remains and among them teeth and dermal denticles of the Symmoriiformes Zangerl, 1981. Two tooth-based taxa were identified: a falcatid Denaea saltsmani Ginter and Hansen, 2010, and a new species of Stethacanthus Newberry, 1889, S. concavus sp. nov. In addition, there occur a few long, monocuspid tooth-like denticles, similar to those observed in Cobelodus Zangerl, 1973, probably represent- ing the head cover or the spine-brush complex. A review of the available information on the fossil record of Symmoriiformes has revealed that the group existed from the Late Devonian (Famennian) till the end of the Middle Permian (Capitanian). Key words: Symmoriiformes; Microfossils; Carboniferous; Indian Cave Sandstone; USA Midcontinent. INTRODUCTION size and shape is concerned [compare the thick me- dian cusp, almost a centimetre long, in Stethacanthus The Symmoriiformes (Symmoriida sensu Zan- neilsoni (Traquair, 1898), and the minute, 0.5 mm gerl 1981) are a group of Palaeozoic cladodont sharks wide, multicuspid, comb-like tooth of Denaea wangi sharing several common characters: relatively short Wang, Jin and Wang, 2004; Ginter et al. 2010, figs skulls, large eyes, terminal mouth, epicercal but ex- 58A–C and 61, respectively].
  • Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour

    Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour Elisa Carotti 1,†, Federica Carducci 1,†, Adriana Canapa 1, Marco Barucca 1,* , Samuele Greco 2 , Marco Gerdol 2 and Maria Assunta Biscotti 1 1 Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy; [email protected] (E.C.); [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (M.A.B.) 2 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri, 5-34127 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] (S.G.); [email protected] (M.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equal contribution. Abstract: Transposable elements (TEs) represent a considerable fraction of eukaryotic genomes, thereby contributing to genome size, chromosomal rearrangements, and to the generation of new coding genes or regulatory elements. An increasing number of works have reported a link between the genomic abundance of TEs and the adaptation to specific environmental conditions. Diadromy represents a fascinating feature of fish, protagonists of migratory routes between marine and fresh- water for reproduction. In this work, we investigated the genomes of 24 fish species, including 15 teleosts with a migratory behaviour. The expected higher relative abundance of DNA transposons in ray-finned fish compared with the other fish groups was not confirmed by the analysis of the dataset considered. The relative contribution of different TE types in migratory ray-finned species did not show clear differences between oceanodromous and potamodromous fish. On the contrary, a remarkable relationship between migratory behaviour and the quantitative difference reported for short interspersed nuclear (retro)elements (SINEs) emerged from the comparison between anadro- mous and catadromous species, independently from their phylogenetic position.
  • The Pharynx of the Stem-Chondrichthyan Ptomacanthus and the Early Evolution of the Gnathostome Gill Skeleton

    The Pharynx of the Stem-Chondrichthyan Ptomacanthus and the Early Evolution of the Gnathostome Gill Skeleton

    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10032-3 OPEN The pharynx of the stem-chondrichthyan Ptomacanthus and the early evolution of the gnathostome gill skeleton Richard P. Dearden 1, Christopher Stockey1,2 & Martin D. Brazeau1,3 The gill apparatus of gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates) is fundamental to feeding and ventilation and a focal point of classic hypotheses on the origin of jaws and paired appen- 1234567890():,; dages. The gill skeletons of chondrichthyans (sharks, batoids, chimaeras) have often been assumed to reflect ancestral states. However, only a handful of early chondrichthyan gill skeletons are known and palaeontological work is increasingly challenging other pre- supposed shark-like aspects of ancestral gnathostomes. Here we use computed tomography scanning to image the three-dimensionally preserved branchial apparatus in Ptomacanthus,a 415 million year old stem-chondrichthyan. Ptomacanthus had an osteichthyan-like compact pharynx with a bony operculum helping constrain the origin of an elongate elasmobranch-like pharynx to the chondrichthyan stem-group, rather than it representing an ancestral condition of the crown-group. A mixture of chondrichthyan-like and plesiomorphic pharyngeal pat- terning in Ptomacanthus challenges the idea that the ancestral gnathostome pharynx con- formed to a morphologically complete ancestral type. 1 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK. 2 Centre for Palaeobiology Research, School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK. 3 Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.D.B.
  • FAMILY Callorhinchidae - Plownose Chimaeras Notes: Callorhynchidae Garman, 1901:77 [Ref

    FAMILY Callorhinchidae - Plownose Chimaeras Notes: Callorhynchidae Garman, 1901:77 [Ref

    FAMILY Callorhinchidae - plownose chimaeras Notes: Callorhynchidae Garman, 1901:77 [ref. 1541] (family) Callorhinchus [as Callorhynchus, name must be corrected Article 32.5.3; corrected to Callorhinchidae by Goodrich 1909:176 [ref. 32502], confirmed by Nelson 2006:45 [ref. 32486]] GENUS Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798 - elephantfishes [=Callorhinchus Lacepède [B. G. E.] (ex Gronow), 1798:400, Callorhyncus Fleming [J.], 1822:380, Callorynchus Cuvier [G.] (ex Gronow), 1816:140] Notes: [ref. 2708]. Masc. Chimaera callorynchus Linnaeus, 1758. Type by monotypy. Subsequently described from excellent description by Gronow as Callorhynchus (Cuvier 1829:382) and Callorhincus (Duméril 1806:104); unjustifiably emended (from Gronow 1754) by Agassiz 1846:60 [ref. 64] to Callirhynchus. •Valid as Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798 -- (Nakamura et al. 1986:58 [ref. 14235], Compagno 1986:147 [5648], Paxton et al. 1989:98 [ref. 12442], Gomon et al. 1994:190 [ref. 22532] as Callorhynchus, Didier 1995:14 [ref. 22713], Paxton et al. 2006:50 [ref. 28994], Gomon 2008:147 [ref. 30616], Di Dario et al. 2011:546 [ref. 31478]). Current status: Valid as Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798. Callorhinchidae. (Callorhyncus) [ref. 5063]. Masc. Callorhyncus antarcticus Fleming (not of Lay & Bennett 1839), 1822. Type by monotypy. Perhaps best considered an unjustified emendation of Callorhincus Lacepède; virtually no distinguishing features presented, and none for species independent of that for genus. •Synonym of Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798. Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798. Callorhinchidae. (Callorynchus) [ref. 993]. Masc. Chimaera callorhynchus Linnaeus, 1758. Type by monotypy. The one included species given as "La Chimère antarctique (Chimaera callorynchus L)." •Synonym of Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798; both being based on Gronow 1754 (pre-Linnaean). Current status: Synonym of Callorhinchus Lacepède, 1798.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 15 Phylum Chordata Chordates are placed in the superphylum Deuterostomia. The possible rela- tionships of the chordates and deuterostomes to other metazoans are dis- cussed in Halanych (2004). He restricts the taxon of deuterostomes to the chordates and their proposed immediate sister group, a taxon comprising the hemichordates, echinoderms, and the wormlike Xenoturbella. The phylum Chordata has been used by most recent workers to encompass members of the subphyla Urochordata (tunicates or sea-squirts), Cephalochordata (lancelets), and Craniata (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). The Cephalochordata and Craniata form a mono- phyletic group (e.g., Cameron et al., 2000; Halanych, 2004). Much disagree- ment exists concerning the interrelationships and classification of the Chordata, and the inclusion of the urochordates as sister to the cephalochor- dates and craniates is not as broadly held as the sister-group relationship of cephalochordates and craniates (Halanych, 2004). Many excitingCOPYRIGHTED fossil finds in recent years MATERIAL reveal what the first fishes may have looked like, and these finds push the fossil record of fishes back into the early Cambrian, far further back than previously known. There is still much difference of opinion on the phylogenetic position of these new Cambrian species, and many new discoveries and changes in early fish systematics may be expected over the next decade. As noted by Halanych (2004), D.-G. (D.) Shu and collaborators have discovered fossil ascidians (e.g., Cheungkongella), cephalochordate-like yunnanozoans (Haikouella and Yunnanozoon), and jaw- less craniates (Myllokunmingia, and its junior synonym Haikouichthys) over the 15 06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 16 16 Fishes of the World last few years that push the origins of these three major taxa at least into the Lower Cambrian (approximately 530–540 million years ago).
  • Database of Bibliography of Living/Fossil

    Database of Bibliography of Living/Fossil

    www.shark-references.com Version 16.01.2018 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2017 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32409.72801 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 16.01.2018 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 817 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2017. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2017, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2017, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide data information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the years 1990 to 2017 in a hot spot analysis. New in this year's POTY is the subheader "biodiversity" comprising a complete list of all valid chimaeriform, selachian and batoid species, as well as a list of the top 20 most researched chondrichthyan species. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however, possible errors cannot entirely be excluded.
  • A New Cochliodont Anterior Tooth Plate from the Mississippian of Alabama (USA) Having Implications for the Origin of Tooth Plates from Tooth Files Wayne M

    A New Cochliodont Anterior Tooth Plate from the Mississippian of Alabama (USA) Having Implications for the Origin of Tooth Plates from Tooth Files Wayne M

    Itano and Lambert Zoological Letters (2018) 4:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-018-0097-8 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access A new cochliodont anterior tooth plate from the Mississippian of Alabama (USA) having implications for the origin of tooth plates from tooth files Wayne M. Itano1* and Lance L. Lambert2 Abstract Background: Paleozoic holocephalian tooth plates are rarely found articulated in their original positions. When they are found isolated, it is difficult to associate the small, anterior tooth plates with the larger, more posterior ones. Tooth plates are presumed to have evolved from fusion of tooth files. However, there is little fossil evidence for this hypothesis. Results: We report a tooth plate having nearly perfect bilateral symmetry from the Mississippian (Chesterian Stage) Bangor Limestone of Franklin County, Alabama, USA. The high degree of symmetry suggests that it may have occupied a symphyseal or parasymphyseal position. The tooth plate resembles Deltodopsis? bialveatus St. John and Worthen, 1883, but differs in having a sharp ridge with multiple cusps arranged along the occlusal surface of the presumed labiolingual axis, rather than a relatively smooth occlusal surface. The multicusped shape is suggestive of a fused tooth file. The middle to latest Chesterian (Serpukhovian) age is determined by conodonts found in the same bed. Conclusion: The new tooth plate is interpreted as an anterior tooth plate of a chondrichthyan fish. It is referred to Arcuodus multicuspidatus Itano and Lambert, gen. et sp. nov. Deltodopsis? bialveatus is also referred to Arcuodus. Keywords: Chondrichthyes, Cochliodontiformes, Carboniferous, Mississippian, Bangor limestone, Alabama, Conodonts Background Paleontological studies show that the elasmobranch dental Extant chondrichthyan fishes comprise two clades: the pattern of rows of tooth files, with teeth replaced in a elasmobranchs (sharks, skates, and rays) and the holoce- linguo-labial sequence has been highly conserved, since it phalians (chimaeras).
  • Feeding Habits of the Cockfish, Callorhinchus Callorynchus (Holocephali: Callorhinchidae) from Off Northern Argentina

    Feeding Habits of the Cockfish, Callorhinchus Callorynchus (Holocephali: Callorhinchidae) from Off Northern Argentina

    Neotropical Ichthyology Original article https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2018-0126 Feeding habits of the cockfish, Callorhinchus callorynchus (Holocephali: Callorhinchidae) from off northern Argentina Correspondence: 1,2 3 1,3 Jorge M. Roman Jorge M. Roman , Melisa A. Chierichetti , Santiago A. Barbini 1,3 [email protected] and Lorena B. Scenna The feeding habits of Callorhinchus callorynchus were investigated in coastal waters off northern Argentina. The effect of body size, seasons and regions was evaluated on female diet composition using a multiple-hypothesis modelling approach. Callorhinchus callorynchus fed mainly on bivalves (55.61% PSIRI), followed by brachyuran crabs (10.62% PSIRI) and isopods (10.13% PSIRI). Callorhinchus callorynchus females showed changes in the diet composition with increasing body size and also between seasons and regions. Further, this species is able to consume larger bivalves as it grows. Trophic level was 3.15, characterizing it as a secondary consumer. We conclude that C. callorynchus showed a behavior of crushing hard prey, mainly on bivalves, brachyuran, gastropods and anomuran crabs. Females of this species shift their diet with increasing body size and in Submitted September 21, 2018 response to seasonal and regional changes in prey abundance or distribution. Accepted December 5, 2019 by Lisa Whitenack Keywords: Chondrichthyes, Diet, Ontogenetic shifts, Southwest Atlantic, Published April 20, 2020 Trophic level. Online version ISSN 1982-0224 Print version ISSN 1679-6225 1 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350, B7602AYL, Mar del Plata Neotrop. Ichthyol. Argentina. (JMR) [email protected] 2 Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, calle 526 e/ 10 y 11, La Plata, Argentina.
  • Phylogenetic Character List

    Phylogenetic Character List

    Supplementary Information for Endochondral bone in an Early Devonian ‘placoderm’ from Mongolia Martin D. Brazeau, Sam Giles, Richard P. Dearden, Anna Jerve, Y.A. Ariunchimeg, E. Zorig, Robert Sansom, Thomas Guillerme, Marco Castiello Table of Contents Phylogenetic character list ................................................................................................. 1 Character state transformations ...................................................................................... 28 Supplementary Tables ..................................................................................................... 40 Supplementary References .............................................................................................. 43 Phylogenetic character list The character list derives primarily from Clement et al. 1 with some additions. To facilitate interpretation of characters, we have retained descriptive text and extended to them or added descriptions where relevant. Notes from Clement et al. are in parentheses and references within parenthetical text refer to citations in their paper 1. Tessellate prismatic calcified cartilage. 0 absent 1 present 2. Prismatic calcified cartilage. Culmacanthus, Eurycaraspis, Gemuendina, Lunaspis, Ptomacanthus, Ramirosuarezia, Rhamphodopsis, Ramirosuarezia changed from inapplicable to missing as all these taxa are scored as missing data for the principal character (absence or presence of calcified cartilage). 0 single layered 1 multi-layered 3. Perichondral bone. 0 present 1 absent 4. Extensive
  • The Geological and Biological Environment of the Bear Gulch Limestone (Mississippian of Montana, USA) and a Model for Its Deposition

    The Geological and Biological Environment of the Bear Gulch Limestone (Mississippian of Montana, USA) and a Model for Its Deposition

    The geological and biological environment of the Bear Gulch Limestone (Mississippian of Montana, USA) and a model for its deposition Eileen D. GROGAN Biology Department, St. Joseph’s University, Philadelphia Pa 19131 (USA) Research Associate, The Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia (USA) [email protected] Richard LUND Research Associate, Section of Vertebrate Fossils, Carnegie Museum of Natural History (USA) Grogan E. D. & Lund R. 2002. — The geological and biological environment of the Bear Gulch Limestone (Mississippian of Montana, USA) and a model for its deposition. Geodiversitas 24 (2) : 295-315. ABSTRACT The Bear Gulch Limestone (Heath Formation, Big Snowy Group, Fergus County, Montana, USA) is a Serpukhovian (upper Mississippian, Namurian E2b) Konservat lagerstätte, deposited in the Central Montana Trough, at about 12° North latitude. It contains fossils from a productive Paleozoic marine bay including a diverse biota of fishes, invertebrates, and algae. We describe several new biofacies: an Arborispongia-productid, a filamentous algal and a shallow facies. The previously named central basin facies and upper- most zone are redefined. We address the issue of fossil preservation, superbly detailed for some of the fish and soft-bodied invertebrates, which cannot be accounted for by persistent anoxic bottom conditions. Select features of the fossils implicate environmental conditions causing simultaneous asphyxiation and burial of organisms. The organic-rich sediments throughout the central basin facies are rhythmically alternating microturbidites. Our analyses suggest that these microturbidites were principally generated during summer mon- soonal storms by carrying sheetwash-eroded and/or resuspended sediments over a pycnocline. The cascading organic-charged sediments of the detached turbidity flows would absorb oxygen as they descended, thereby suffocating and burying animals situated below the pycnocline.
  • Mississippian Chondrichthyan Fishes from the Area of Krzeszowice, Southern Poland

    Mississippian Chondrichthyan Fishes from the Area of Krzeszowice, Southern Poland

    Mississippian chondrichthyan fishes from the area of Krzeszowice, southern Poland MICHAŁ GINTER and MICHAŁ ZŁOTNIK Ginter, M. and Złotnik, M. 2019. Mississippian chondrichthyan fishes from the area of Krzeszowice, southern Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 64 (3): 549–564. Two new assemblages of Mississippian pelagic chondrichthyan microremains were recovered from the pelagic lime- stone of the area of Krzeszowice, NW of Kraków, Poland. The older assemblage represents the upper Tournaisian of Czatkowice Quarry and the younger one the upper Viséan of the Czernka stream valley at Czerna. The teeth of sym- moriiform Falcatidae are the major component of both collections. A comparison of the taxonomic composition of the assemblage from Czerna (with the falcatids and Thrinacodus as the major components) to the previously published materials from the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland), Muhua (southern China), and Grand Canyon (Northern Arizona, USA) revealed the closest similarity to the first of these, probably deposited in a deeper water environment, relatively far from submarine carbonate platforms. A short review of Mississippian falcatids shows that the late Viséan–Serpukhovian period was the time of the greatest diversity of this group. Key words: Chondrichthyes, Falcatidae, teeth, Carboniferous, Tournaisian, Viséan, Poland, Kraków Upland. Michał Ginter [[email protected]] and Michał Złotnik [[email protected]], Faculty of Geology, University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland. Received 27 March 2019, accepted 30 April 2019, available online 23 August 2019. Copyright © 2019 M. Ginter and M. Złotnik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (for details please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unre- stricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.