Becle, S.A.B. De C.V
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mexican Stock Exchange Stock Exchange Code: Walmex Quarter: 03 Year: 2010
MEXICAN STOCK EXCHANGE STOCK EXCHANGE CODE: WALMEX QUARTER: 03 YEAR: 2010 WAL - MART DE MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V. BALANCE SHEETS TO SEPTIEMBRE 30 OF 2010 AND 2009 CONSOLIDATED (Thousand Pesos) Final Printing CURRENT YEAR PREVIOUS YEAR REF S CONCEPTS Amount % Amount % s01 TOTAL ASSETS 176,964,949 100 120,383,374 100 s02 CURRENT ASSETS 48,760,667 28 37,942,681 32 s03 CASH AND AVAILABLE INVESTMENTS 15,270,571 9 13,511,292 11 s04 ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE (NET) 1,572,194 1 750,955 1 s05 OTHER ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE (NET) 3,639,266 2 2,435,989 2 s06 INVENTORIES 27,733,086 16 20,749,520 17 s07 OTHER CURRENT ASSETS 545,550 0 494,925 0 s08 LONG-TERM 0 0 0 0 s09 ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE (NET) 0 0 0 0 INVESTMENTS IN SHARES OF NON-CONSOLIDATED s10 0 0 0 0 SUBSIDIARIES, JOINT VENTURES AND ASSOCIATES s11 OTHER INVESTMENTS 0 0 0 0 s12 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (NET) 97,174,256 55 82,440,693 68 s13 LAND AND BUILDINGS 91,460,061 52 79,413,222 66 s14 MACHINERY AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 s15 OTHER EQUIPMENT 38,979,322 22 31,414,842 26 s16 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 36,358,068 21 31,369,422 26 s17 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 3,092,941 2 2,982,051 2 s18 OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND DEFERRED ASSETS (NET) 31,030,026 18 0 0 s19 OTHER ASSETS 0 0 0 0 s20 TOTAL LIABILITIES 60,050,262 100 42,147,893 100 s21 CURRENT LIABILITIES 41,973,529 70 32,903,973 78 s22 SUPPLIERS 30,074,738 50 24,037,514 57 s23 BANK LOANS 264,444 0 0 0 s24 STOCK MARKET LOANS 0 0 0 0 s103 OTHER LOANS WITH COST 977,197 2 233,238 1 s25 TAXES PAYABLE 932,038 2 0 0 s26 OTHER CURRENT -
Mexico's Economic Competitiveness Strategy at a Geopolitical Inflection
A NEW ADMINISTRATION CONFRONTS A CHANGING WORLD: MEXICO’S ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS STRATEGY AT A GEOPOLITICAL INFLECTION POINT CHRISTOPHER WILSON GOVERNANCE | MAY 2019 A NEW ADMINISTRATION CONFRONTS A CHANGING WORLD: MEXICO’S ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS STRATEGY AT A GEOPOLITICAL INFLECTION POINT CHRISTOPHER WILSON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Some three decades ago, Mexico made a bet on the global economy, and at a time when populism and protectionism are on the rise, the payoff is at risk. In response, Mexico must double down on its openness while addressing the critical structural problems, including corruption and inequality, that inhibit its domestic economy and led to the sweeping electoral victory of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) in 2018. This essay reviews Mexico’s economic progress and the challenges ahead as a new administration takes office at a time of significant stress on regional and global economic institutions. For more than a half-century following the Mexican Revolution, the country’s foreign policy was based on the principal of noninterventionism, a not so subtle way of telling the United States and others not to meddle in Mexico’s domestic affairs. The economic equivalent was Mexico’s policy of import substitution, which raised tariffs and barriers to foreign investment designed to protect the country’s domestic industries from international competition. The two combined to make Mexico an insular country, and despite the significant economic expansion achieved in the decades following World War II, by the 1970s, Mexico’s economy and politics were showing signs of strain. In the following decade, Mexico’s relationship with the world was flipped on its head. -
Mexico's 2012 Elections
Mexico’s 2012 Elections: Key Issues and Critical Questions Now and Beyond Eric L. Olson June 2012 1 About the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute The Mexico Institute seeks to improve understanding, communication, and cooperation between Mexico and the United States by promoting original research, encouraging public discussion, and proposing policy options for enhancing the bilateral relationship. A bi-national Advisory Board, chaired by José Antonio Fernández Carbajal and Roger W. Wallace, oversees the work of the Mexico Institute. The Institute maintains an ongoing focus on five key issues in U.S.-Mexico relations: Security Cooperation, Economic Integration, Migration and Migrants, Border Issues, Energy and Natural Resources. The views of the author do not represent an official position of the Woodrow Wilson Center. For questions related to the paper and for media inquiries please contact the author at 202-691-4336 or via email at [email protected]. Copyright Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars; Mexico Institute 2 Mexico’s 2012 Elections: Key Issues and Critical Questions Now and Beyond By Eric L. Olson SUMMARY: • Mexicans go to the polls on July 1st to elect a president for a single six-year term, 128 Senators, 500 Deputies, 6 governors and the Mayor of Mexico City.1 Polls suggest that the long-ruling PRI is poised to return to power after a 12-year hiatus.2 • Polls have consistently shown former PRI governor Enrique Peña Nieto with a commanding lead, lending a sense of inevitability to the campaign. Efforts by opponents to cast the return of the PRI as a step back to an “authoritarian” and “undemocratic” past have reduced the frontrunner’s lead slightly, but it appears that a plurality of Mexicans see Peña Nieto and the PRI as capable of delivering a better future. -
Capital Markets Introduction: the Capital Market in Mexico Is
Capital Markets Introduction: The capital market in Mexico is composed of preferred, common stock and FIBRAS which they can be issued as public or private offer. The private offer is over the counter which offers to the other company and some persons. And we have public offer which is held by investor’s bank and other intermediates to the general public in the Mexican Stock exchange market which holds all the operations in Mexico. At the same time it is regulated by the Secretaria de Hacienda y Credito Publico and Banco de Mexico. What is a common Stock? Common stocks are securities that represent a share of a company’s equity and are issued to obtain financing and are traded amongst investors through the BMV. The ownership of the common stock grants its buyer the rights of a shareholder as a nominal owner of the company. Gains for the investors are achieved in two forms: 1. Dividends that the company pays (common shares allow the investor to share in the Company’s earnings and to appreciate in value with the company). 2. Capital gains are calculated as the differential value of the stock when it was sold and when it was bought. There is no maturity date for these securities because the decision to sell it or to retain it resides exclusively in the holder. The price is based on the performance of the issuing Company and the public’s expectations of the Company’s future earnings and performance. Its price is influenced by external elements that affect the market in general. -
Reports Offer 2020 Corporación Actinver S.A.B
Reports Offer 2020 Corporación Actinver S.A.B. de C.V. July, 2020 Montes Urales 620. Lomas de Chapultepec, C.P. 11000 Ciudad de México Actinver: (55) 1103 6600 Markets Equity Mexico Equity Global Inversiones AM Equity Research of 14 Sectors / Reporte de Acciones del SIC 50+ Companies Daily Report Daily Report Receive the most recent market figures Daily Report See one by one the companies that are listed prior to the market opening, as well as Obtain the analysis, comments, opinion, in SIC, you will find financial and market the most important news from Mexico news and much more of each of the information. and the world to support your companies that we have under coverage. investment decision. •Ratings of the different brokerage firms • Initiation of coverage that have company coverage Weekly Economic Vision • Comments and company news •Target price of analysts' consensus | Weekly Report • Companies' updates •Quarterly financial information This report will help you understand the • Quarterly estimates way in which the indicators impact • Quarterly results Dashboard financial markets, in this report you will find updated forecasts for the main Bolsa Movers & Shakers Daily Report economic variables in Mexico. Find in an easy way the main market Daily Report variables of the shares available in SIC as Economic Studies Companies Report well as the main comparatives. | Occasional Report | Equity Research Get a detailed analysis of those events Includes the most relevant news and its Estadístico: Bolsas en EUA ♦ New that could impact the economy of the impact for the companies listed on the country in the medium and long term. -
Becle, S.A.B. De C.V
[Translation for informational purposes only] ANNUAL REPORT FILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ISSUERS OF SECURITIES AND TO OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN THE SECURITIES MARKET, FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018. BECLE, S.A.B. DE C.V. Guillermo González Camarena No.800-4, Col. Zedec Santa Fe, C.P. 01210, Mexico City, Mexico “CUERVO” Securities Representing the Capital Stock of the Issuer Characteristics Market in which they are registered Single Series Shares of Common Stock Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. The securities of the issuer referred to above are registered in the National Securities Registry (Registro Nacional de Valores). Registration in the National Securities Registry (Registro Nacional de Valores) does not certify the soundness of the securities or the solvency of the issuer, or the accuracy or veracity of the information contained in the prospectus, and it does not validate the actions that, as applicable, have been performed in contravention of applicable law. [Translation for informational purposes only] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) Overview 4 A) GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS 4 B) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 C) RISK FACTORS 22 D) OTHER SECURITIES 42 E) MATERIAL CHANGES TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITIES REGISTERED IN THE NATIONAL SECURITIES REGISTRY 43 F) PUBLIC DOCUMENTS 44 2) THE COMPANY 45 A) HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY 45 B) BUSINESS DESCRIPTION 49 i) Main Activity 49 ii) Distribution Channels 61 iii) Patents, licenses, brands and other agreements 63 iv) Main customers 64 v) Applicable law -
Foreign Entry and the Mexican Banking System
These Are the Good Old Days: Foreign Entry and the Mexican Banking System Stephen Haber Aldo Musacchio Working Paper 13-062 January 10, 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Stephen Haber and Aldo Musacchio Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. These Are the Good Old Days: Foreign Entry and the Mexican Banking System Stephen Haber And Aldo Musacchio** ** Haber is Peter and Helen Bing Senior Fellow of the Hoover Institution and A.A. and Jeanne Welch Milligan Professor, Department of Political Science, Stanford University. He is also a Research Economist at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Musacchio is an Associate Professor of Business, Government, and the International Economy at the Harvard Business School, and a Research Fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research. 1 SUMMARY THESE ARE THE GOOD OLD DAYS: FOREIGN ENTRY AND THE MEXICAN BANKING SYSTEM In 1997, the Mexican government reversed long-standing policies and allowed foreign banks to purchase Mexico’s largest commercial banks and relaxed restrictions on the founding of new, foreign-owned banks. The result has been a dramatic shift in the ownership structure of Mexico’s banks. For instance, while in 1991 only one percent of bank assets in Mexico were foreign owned, today they control 74 percent of assets. In no other country in the world has the penetration of foreign banks been as rapid or as far-reaching as in Mexico. -
Liberation of Foreign Investment Policies in Mexico: Legal Changes Encouraging New Direct Foreign Investment
Volume 21 Issue 2 Spring 1991 Spring 1991 Liberation of Foreign Investment Policies in Mexico: Legal Changes Encouraging New Direct Foreign Investment Charles T. DuMars University of New Mexico - Main Campus Recommended Citation Charles T. DuMars, Liberation of Foreign Investment Policies in Mexico: Legal Changes Encouraging New Direct Foreign Investment, 21 N.M. L. Rev. 251 (1991). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmlr/vol21/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The University of New Mexico School of Law. For more information, please visit the New Mexico Law Review website: www.lawschool.unm.edu/nmlr LIBERALIZATION OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT POLICIES IN MEXICO: LEGAL CHANGES ENCOURAGING NEW DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT CHARLES T. DuMARS* I. INTRODUCTION The nations of Mexico and the United States are drawn together by numerous economic, political, and historical forces. While our common history as developing nations of the new world is significant and im- migration policies are likewise critical, the most significant force pulling us together is our growing economic interdependence. This economic interdependence is reflected in the extensive changes over the past three years in Mexico's foreign investment laws. These changes cannot be understood in a vacuum. They make sense only in a historical context and with an understanding of the economic forces that have shaped them. This article begins by exploring Mexico's debt crisis and its current economic position in the world economy. This discussion is followed by a review of the history leading up to the current foreign investment laws. These laws are examined in detail, with particular emphasis on the Maquiladora program. -
Retrenchment, Expansion, and the Transformation of Mexican Social
Retrenchment, expansion, and the transformation of Mexican social protection policies Michelle Dion Assistant Professor Sam Nunn School of International Affairs Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0610 [email protected] ABSTRACT: Social protection policies in Mexico have been transformed since 1988 through partial retrenchment of social insurance and significant expansion of targeted or means-tested social assistance. These changes reflect a substantial re-definition of social protection through incremental changes in policy. The changes reflect the abandonment of the goal of developing an employment-based, universal welfare regime, which had been pursued by Mexican governments as late as the 1970s. Instead, recent administrations have moved toward the redefinition of Mexico's welfare regime into a residual, mean-tested model with significant private provision of benefits and services. This shift in social protection is consistent with the change in Mexico’s overall economic development strategy and increasing political competition in the process of democratization. KEYWORDS: social protection, social assistance, social insurance, Mexico Published in Social Policy & Administration, 42, 4 (August 2008): 434 – 450. Introduction Throughout Latin America, the more economically advanced countries developed extensive social insurance institutions throughout the twentieth century. Usually, social insurance was an integral part of the import substitution industrialization (ISI) development model pursued by governments. In many countries, including in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, social insurance was also used by populist politicians or political parties to secure the support of the organized working class. Rapid economic collapse in the 1980s followed by economic restructuring in the 1990s not only led to the replacement of ISI with economic neoliberalism but also changed the underlying structure of the labor market and brought new pressures to bear on social insurance. -
Mexico: a Decade of Falling Inequality: Market Forces Or State Action? Gerardo Esquivel, Nora Lustig, and John Scott
07-0410-2 CH 7:Cohen-Easterly 3/17/10 8:47 PM Page 175 7 Mexico: A Decade of Falling Inequality: Market Forces or State Action? gerardo esquivel, nora lustig, and john scott exico is among the most unequal countries in the world.1 However, it is Mmaking progress in becoming less unequal: from 1996 to 2006, Mexico’s Gini coefficient fell from 0.543 to 0.498 (or by 0.8 percent a year),2 and from 2000 to 2006 it fell by 1 percent a year.3 The decline in inequality coincided with 1. The authors are grateful to participants in the UNDP project “Markets, the State, and the Dynam- ics of Inequality in Latin America,” coordinated by Nora Lustig and Luis Felipe López Calva, as well as to participants in seminars at the United Nations offices in New York and Mexico City, the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association meeting in Rio de Janeiro, and the Latin American Studies Associa- tion meeting in Rio de Janeiro. We also are very grateful to Mary Kwak and anonymous reviewers for their very useful comments and suggestions and to Fedora Carbajal as well as Edith Cortés, Francisco Islas, and Mariellen Malloy Jewers for their outstanding research assistance. 2. The Gini reported in this paragraph is calculated by using total income (which includes monetary income and nonmonetary income, such as the imputed value of owner-occupied housing and auto- consumption, but does not include capital gains). The decomposition of income inequality by source pre- sented in this chapter uses current monetary income (which excludes capital gains and nonmonetary income). -
The Mexican Revolution and the Relevant Present Anton Schulzki – William J
The Mexican Revolution and the Relevant Present Anton Schulzki – William J. Palmer High School, Colorado Springs Objectives for the day Attendees will examine the relationship between the United States and Mexico Attendees will discuss the historical impact of the Mexican Revolution on Mexico and the relationship between the United States Attendees will develop techniques for using relevant connections in class What is the connection between these two individuals? What is the connection between these two events? United States troops at the U.S.- Remains of Columbus New Mexican border 2018 Mexico after Villa raid 1916 Mexican Revolution K-N-L What do you Know What do you Need to know (what do you want to know) What have you Learned “So close to the United States, so far from God” – Porfirio Diaz Revolution was the single greatest political, social and cultural event in the 20th century 1million to 1.5 million died as a result (total population of approx.. 15 million) 300,000 to 450,000 emigrated to the United States from 1910-1930 United States invaded/attacked/intervened in the Mexican Revolution at least three different times – including the 1916-1917 Punitive Expedition Constitution of 1917 seen as a model for constitutions written in Latin America in the 20th century – including Cuban Led to a development of Mexican cultural expressions including muralists and corridos Popular vision of the Mexican Revolution How I approach the Mexican Revolution A topic of study for the International Baccalaureate program Entire unit -
Facets of Texas Legal History
SMU Law Review Volume 52 Issue 4 Article 9 1999 Facets of Texas Legal History Frances Spears Cloyd Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Frances Spears Cloyd, Facets of Texas Legal History, 52 SMU L. REV. 1653 (1999) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol52/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. FACETS OF TEXAS LEGAL HISTORY Frances Spears Cloyd* OR three hundred years Spain ruled vast areas in the Western hemisphere. She regarded these colonial possessions as being en- tirely the King's, for his use and benefit. She exploited them for royal profit through a tight trade monopoly and extended her laws into them. Her domination was approaching an end when the Anglo-Ameri- cans began to come into Texas. Moses Austin got permission from the Spanish government to take a colony into Texas in 1821. He died before he was able to complete his project and bequeathed the responsibility to his son, Stephen. In this same year Mexico and Spain were clashing. Iturbide led a pow- erful liberal movement based on unity of all classes, independence under a Bourbon prince with power limited by a constitution, and protection of the Catholic Church. Mexico proclaimed her independence from Spain and proceeded to the drafting of an extremely complex constitution.' It was completed and promulgated in 1824.