October 18, 1918
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Buffer Handbook Plant List
THE BUFFER HANDBOOK PLANT LIST Originally Developed by: Cynthia Kuhns, Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates With funding provided by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Maine Department of Environmental Protection,1998. Revised 2001 and 2009. Publication #DEPLW0094-B2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements 1 Introductory Information Selection of Plants for This List 1 Plant List Organization & Information 3 Terms & Abbreviations 4 Plant Hardiness Zone Map 5 General Tree & Shrub Planting Guidelines 5 Tips for Planting Perennials 7 Invasive Plants to Avoid 7 Plant Lists TREES 8 (30 to 100 ft.) SHRUBS 14 Small Trees/Large Shrubs 15 (12 to 30 ft.) Medium Shrubs 19 (6 to 12 ft.) Small Shrubs 24 (Less than 6 ft.) GROUNDLAYERS 29 Perennial Herbs & Flowers 30 Ferns 45 Grasses 45 Vines 45 References 49 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Original Publication: This plant list was published with the help of Clean Water Act, Section 319 funds, under a grant awarded to the Androscoggin Valley Soil and Water Conservation District and with help from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Graphics and ‘clip-art’ used in this document came from the University of Wisconsin-Extension and from Microsoft Office 97(Small Business Edition) and ClickArt 97 (Broderbund Software, Inc). This publication was originally developed by Cynthia Kuhns of Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates. Substantial assistance was received from Phoebe Hardesty of the Androscoggin Valley Soil and Water Conservation District. Valuable review and advice was given by Karen Hahnel and Kathy Hoppe of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Elizabeth T. Muir provided free and cheerful editing and botanical advice. -
Trees and Shrubsdeciduous
Species: Sorbus americana Trees and Shrubs Deciduous Common Name: American mountain ash Directions: Fill in the date and time in the top rows and circle the appropriate letter in the column below. Nickname: y (phenophase is occurring); n (phenophase is not occurring); ? (not certain if the phenophase is occurring). Site: Do not circle anything if you did not check for the phenophase. In the adjacent blank, write in the appropriate measure of intensity or abundance for this phenophase. Year: Observer: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Do you see... Time: Time: Time: Time: Time: Time: Time: Time: Breaking leaf buds Leaves Increasing leaf size Colored leaves Falling leaves Flowers or flower buds Open flowers Fruits Ripe fruits Recent fruit or seed drop Check when data entered online: Comments: Plant Phenophase Datasheet Contact: [email protected] | More information: www.usanpn.org/how-observe PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501), please note the following. This information collection is authorized by Organic Act, 43 U.S.C. 31 et seq., 1879 and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. Your response is voluntary. We estimate that it will take approximately 2 minutes to make and report observations per respo- ndent. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. OMB has reviewed and approved this information collection and assigned OMB Control Number 1028-0103. You may submit comments on any aspect of this information collection, incl- uding the accuracy of the estimated burden hours and suggestions to reduce this burden. -
Tree Planting and Management
COMMONWEALTH WAR GRAVES COMMISSION Tree Planting and Management Breadth of Opportunity The spread of the Commission's responsibilities over some 148 countries in temperate, mediterranean, tropical and desert climates provides wonderful opportunities to experiment with nature's wealth of tree species. We are particularly fortunate in being able to grow many interesting and beautiful trees and we will explain how we manage them and what splendid specimens they can make. Why Plant Trees? Trees are planted for a variety of reasons: their amenity value, leaf shape and size, flowers, fruit, habit, form, bark, landscape value, shelter or screening, backcloth planting, shade, noise and pollution reduction, soil stabilisation and to encourage wild life. Often we plant trees solely for their amenity value. That is, the beauty of the tree itself. This can be from the leaves such as those in Robinia pseudoacacia 'Frisia', the flowers in the tropical tree Tabebuia or Albizia, the crimson stems of the sealing wax palm (Cyrtostachys renda), or the fruit as in Magnolia grandiflora. above: Sealing wax palms at Taiping War Cemetery, Malaysia with insert of the fruit of Magnolia grandiflora Selection Generally speaking the form of the left: The tropical tree Tabebuia tree is very often a major contributing factor and this, together with a sound knowledge of below: Flowers of the tropical the situation in which the tree is to tree Albizia julibrissin be grown, guides the decision to the best choice of species. Exposure is a major limitation to the free choice of species in northern Europe especially and trees such as Sorbus, Betula, Tilia, Fraxinus, Crataegus and fastigiate yews play an important role in any landscape design where the elements are seriously against a wider selection. -
Taxonomic Studies on the Lithocolletinae of Japan (Lepidoptera : Gracillariidae) Part 2
Title Taxonomic studies on the Lithocolletinae of Japan (Lepidoptera : Gracillariidae) Part 2 Author(s) Kumata, Tosio Citation Insecta matsumurana, 26(1), 1-48 Issue Date 1963-08 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/9698 Type bulletin (article) File Information 26(1)_p1-48.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP TAXONOMIC STUDIES ON THE LITHOCOLLETINAE OF JAPAN (LEPIDOPTERA : GRACILLARIIDAE) Part Ill) By TOSIO KUMATA Entomological Institute, Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, Sapporo In this part there are given twenty-nine species attacking Ulmaceae, Rosaceae, Legumi nosae, Aceraceae, Ericaceae and Caprifoliaceae, and two host-unknown species of the Lithocolletinae_ Moreover, two new genera are erected for the reception of four new species attacking Leguminosae_ 7_ Species attacking Ulmaceae 32. Lithocolletis tritorrhecta Meyrick (Fig. 1; 3, I-K) Lithocolletis tritorrhecta Meyrick, 1935, Exot. Microlep. 4 : 596; Issiki, 1950, Icon. Ins. Jap.: 454, f. 1224. Phyllonorycter tritorrhecta: Inoue, 1954, Check list Lep. Jap. 1 : 28. This species is represented by the aestival and autumnal forms, which are different III colour. Aestival form: 0 ((. Face silvery-white; palpus whitish, with a blackish streak on pos terior surface; tuft of head golden-ochreous, mixed with many whitish scales in centre; antenna white, each segment ringed with dark brown apically. Thorax golden-ochreous, with two white, wide lines running along inner margins of tegulae, and with a white, small spot at posterior angle. Legs whitish; fore tibia clouded inside; mid tibia with three oblique black streaks outside; all tarsi with black blotches or spots at base, basal 1/3, 3/5 and 4/5. -
18. SORBUS Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 477. 1753.1 花楸属 Hua Qiu Shu Lu Lingdi (陆玲娣 Lu Ling-Ti); Stephen A
Flora of China 9: 144–170. 2003. 18. SORBUS Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 477. 1753.1 花楸属 hua qiu shu Lu Lingdi (陆玲娣 Lu Ling-ti); Stephen A. Spongberg Aria (Persoon) Host; Micromeles Decaisne; Pleiosorbus Lihua Zhou & C. Y. Wu; Sorbus subgen. Aria Persoon. Trees or shrubs, usually deciduous. Winter buds usually rather large, ovoid, conical, or spindle-shaped, sometimes viscid; scales imbricate, several, glabrous or pubescent. Leaves alternate, membranous or herbaceous; stipules caducous, simple or pinnately com- pound, plicate or rarely convolute in bud; leaf blade usually serrate, sometimes nearly entire, venation craspedodromous or campto- dromous, glabrous or pubescent. Inflorescences compound, rarely simple corymbs or panicles. Hypanthium campanulate, rarely ob- conical or urceolate. Sepals 5, ovate or triangular, glabrous, pubescent, or tomentose, sometimes glandular along margin. Petals 5, glabrous or pubescent, base clawed or not. Stamens 15–25(–44) in 2 or 3 whorls, unequal in length; anthers ovoid or subglobose. Carpels 2–5, partly or wholly adnate to hypanthium; ovary semi-inferior to inferior, 2–5(–7)-loculed, with 2 or 3(or 4) ovules per locule, one usually abortive; styles 2–5, free or partially connate, glabrous or pubescent. Fruit a pome, white, yellow, pink, or brown to orange or red, ovoid or globose to ellipsoid or oblong, usually small, glabrous or pubescent, laevigate or with small lenticels, apically with sepals persistent or caducous leaving an annular scar, with 2–5(–7) locules, each with 1 or 2 exendospermous seeds; seeds several, with thin perisperm and endosperm enclosing embryo with compressed cotyledons. About 100 species: widely distributed throughout temperate regions of Asia, Europe, and North America; 67 species (43 endemic) in China. -
Magnolia Obovata
ISSUE 80 INAGNOLN INagnolla obovata Eric Hsu, Putnam Fellow, Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University Photographs by Philippe de 8 poelberch I first encountered Magnolia obovata in Bower at Sir Harold Hillier Gardens and Arboretum, Hampshire, England, where the tightly pursed, waxy, globular buds teased, but rewarded my patience. As each bud unfurled successively, it emitted an intoxicating ambrosial bouquet of melons, bananas, and grapes. Although the leaves were nowhere as luxuriously lustrous as M. grandrflora, they formed an el- egant wreath for the creamy white flower. I gingerly plucked one flower for doser observation, and placed one in my room. When I re- tumed from work later in the afternoon, the mom was overpowering- ly redolent of the magnolia's scent. The same olfactory pleasure was later experienced vicariously through the large Magnolia x wiesneri in the private garden of Nicholas Nickou in southern Connecticut. Several years earlier, I had traveled to Hokkaido Japan, after my high school graduation. Although Hokkaido experiences more severe win- ters than those in the southern parts of Japan, the forests there yield a remarkable diversity of fora, some of which are popular ornamen- tals. When one drives through the region, the silvery to blue-green leaf undersides of Magnolia obovata, shimmering in the breeze, seem to flag the eyes. In "Forest Flora of Japan" (sggII), Charles Sargent commended this species, which he encountered growing tluough the mountainous forests of Hokkaido. He called it "one of the largest and most beautiful of the deciduous-leaved species in size and [the seed conesj are sometimes eight inches long, and brilliant scarlet in color, stand out on branches, it is the most striking feature of the forests. -
TREES for WESTERN NEBRASKA Justin Evertson & Bob Henrickson
THE NEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM PRESENTS TREES FOR WESTERN NEBRASKA Justin Evertson & Bob Henrickson. For more plant information, visit plantnebraska.org or retreenbraska.unl.edu The following species are recommended for areas in the western half of Nebraska and/or typically receive less than 20” of moisture per year. Size Range: The size range indicated for each plant is the expected average mature height x spread for Nebraska. Large Deciduous Trees (typically over 40 feet tall at maturity) 1. Ash, Black ‐ Fraxinus nigra (good on wet sites; very cold tolerant; Fallgold a common form; 45’x 35’) 2. Ash, Green ‐ Fraxinus pennsylvanica (native; very adaptable; good on wet or dry sites; over‐planted; 40‐60’x 25‐40’; 3. Ash, White ‐ Fraxinus americana (native eastern G.P.; good purple/yellow fall color; 40‐50’x 40‐50’) NOTE ON ASH SPECIES: Native American ash trees including those above are being decimated by Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) and the insect is now in Nebraska. NSA recommends that native ash species no longer be planted in Nebraska. 4. Ash, Manchurian ‐ Fraxinus mandshurica (from Asia; upright growth; drought tolerant; may be resistant to EAB; 40’x 30’) 5. Catalpa, Northern ‐ Catalpa speciosa (native; tough tree; large, heart‐shaped leaves, showy flowers and long seed pods; 50’x 35’) 6. Coffeetree, Kentucky ‐ Gymnocladus dioicus (native; amazingly adaptable; beautiful winter form; 50’x 40’) 7. Cottonwood, Eastern ‐ Populus deltoides (majestic native; not for extremely dry sites; avoid most cultivars; 80’x 60’) 8. Cottonwood, Lanceleaf ‐ Populus acuminata (native; naturally occurring hybrid; narrow leaves; for west. G.P.; 50’x 35’) 9. -
The Propagation of M. Amoena Cheng: a Rare Chinese Endemic by Rob Nicholaon of a Large Number of Species
The propagation of M. amoena Cheng: A rare Chinese endemic by Rob Nicholaon of a large number of species. It is a complex mix of plants with no In the autumn of 1982 the species or group of species taxonomists the Arnold of dominating the forest composition Arboretum were excited to see, in and it shows a high number of the Index Seminum the Hangzhou of endemics and monotypic plants. Botanic Garden, a listing of the rare T. P. Chang enumerated the vascular and untested magnolia species, flora of the Tienmu Mountains in Magnolia amoena. We eagerly 1936 and counted a mind-boggling requested seed and late February by 424 woody species. arrived and of the following year it Of the 180 that are trees, 67 wss immediately cold stratified. species form the canopy layer. Subsequent sowing three months Magnolia amoena is found in this later produced 12 seedlings which, to uppermost strata of the forest at an of due the dismay all, died to altitude of 700 to 1000 meters. This damping off. zone is dominated by broad-leaved Attempts to secure more seed from deciduous species, although a number Hangzhou were unsuccessful, and in of conifers do appear. A list of the back of mind have always my I Magnolia amoena's companion wished to atone for this disaster, species might give us some even to go to China and collect seed indication of the plant's unknown myself. A proposal was put forth to hardiness although this be a the Chinese Academy of Sciences may fool's best. -
Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project. -
City of Sandpoint Approved Street Tree List Introduction
CITY OF SANDPOINT APPROVED STREET TREE LIST INTRODUCTION The following list of approved trees is based upon local experience and tree lists from surrounding communities [Missoula, Coeur d'Alene, Post Falls]. The City of Sandpoint is grateful to those communities for sharing their experience and knowledge. This list refers only to planting of trees within the public right of way adjacent to private property. All businesses downtown can generally assume the public right of way [ROW] starts at their building’s edge. Residential property owners, especially those on streets with no sidewalks, can get a rough idea of where the public ROW begins by noting the right of way distance on their particular street. Call Public Works at 263-3407 for your street’s ROW Clearance. Then measure 1/2 of the ROW distance from the middle of the street to wards your property. It won’t be exact (only a survey can determine exactly the Public/private line) but good enough. The ROW distances vary from 30 feet to 80 feet (or 15 to 40 feet from the middle of the road adjacent to the private property). DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES [Bounded by First, Cedar, 5th Avenue, Pine Street] During the downtown revitalization work going on from 2003 through 2007, businesses are urged not to plant any new trees without consulting with Public Works, since all the sidewalks will be dug up during those years and new trees planted. TREE FORM Consideration of a tree's shape at maturity is very important. For instance, while a flowering crab apple may be a small tree, if planted close to a sidewalk or street it can interfere with pedestrians or traffic because in habit it is typically low and horizontal branching. -
Tree Canopy Chart
TREE CANOPY CHART JANUARY 2015 Tree Canopy Coverage after 10 Years Based on information from Virginia Nursery & Landscape Association, Inc., and "tree Canopy Spread and coverage in Urban Landscapes database dated 11/3/2010. http://dendro.cnre.vt.edu/predictions/canopy.cfm Planting Size Caliper - in Tree Canopy Coverage Latin Name Common Name(s) Height - in feet inches After 10 Years© See Note 1 below. (square feet) DECIDUOUS TREES: Acer barbatum Florida Maple, Southern Sugar Maple 6-7 87 A. buergeranum Trident Maple 6-7 64 A. campestre Hedge Maple 6-7 64 A. ginnala Amur Maple 6-7 64 A. palmatum Japanese Maple 6-7 64 A. platanoides Norway maple 2-2 1/2 143 A. pseudoplatanus Sycamore maple 2-2 1/2 143 A. rubrum Red Maple 2-2 1/2 143 A. saccharum Sugar Maple, Rock Maple 2-2 1/2 143 A. truncatum 'Pacific Sunset' Pacific Sunset' Maple 177 A. x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze' Maple 2-2 1/2 154 Aesculus flava Yellow Buckeye, Common Buckeye 6-7 64 A. glabra Ohio Buckeye, American Buckeye 6-7 64 A. hippocastanum Horse-Chestnut, Conker Tree 2-2 1/2 143 A. pavia Red Buckeye, Firecracker Plant 6-7 71 Alnus glutinosa Common Alder, Black Alder 2-2 1/2 95 Amelanchier arborea Downy Serviceberry, Common Serviceberry 6-7 95 A. laevis Smooth Shadbush, Allegheny Serviceberry 95 Amelanchier canadensis Canadian Serviceberry, Chuckleberry 2-5 33 Amelanchier x grandiflora 2-5 44 Betula maximowicziana Monarch Birch 2-2 1/2 95 B. nigra Black Bustard 2-2 1/2 165 B. -
The Reaction of Different Sorbus L. Species to Low Temperatures During Thaw in the Orel Region
Original Paper Journal of Forest Science, 65, 2019 (6): 218–225 https://doi.org/10.17221/8/2019-JFS The reaction of different Sorbus L. species to low temperatures during thaw in the Orel region Zoya Ozherelieva*, Olga Emelianova Russian Research Institute of Fruit Crop Breeding (VNIISPK), Orel, Russia Corresponding author: [email protected] *Citation: Ozherelieva Z., Emelianova O. (2019): The reaction of different Sorbus L. species to low temperatures during thaw in the Orel region. J. For. Sci., 65: 218–225. Abstract: Five Sorbus L. species of different ecological and geographical origin growing in the VNIISPK arboretum were studied. The Institute is located 368 km southwest of Moscow, on the Central Russian upland in the European part of Russia. The studies were carried out in 2014–2016. The reaction of different Sorbus L. species to a three-day thaw +2°C with a subsequent decrease in temperature to –25°C in February and –30°C in March was studied in or- der to identify adapted species to the climatic conditions of the Orel region for use in ornamental horticulture. As a result of the experiment, we recommend Sorbus aria (L.) Crantz, Sorbus aucuparia L. and Sorbus alnifolia (Siebold. et Zucc.) K. Koch. as adapted species for the Orel region to create sustainable landscape compositions. Keywords: artificial freezing; adaptation; frost hardiness Low temperature is a key environmental fac- es (Groffman et al. 2001; Schaberg et al. 2008; tor determining the evolution and distribution of Ozherelieva, Sedov 2017). Thus in nature, slight plants (Hawkins et al. 2014). Frost can damage freezing or death of trees is observed as a conse- plants through xylem embolism and the forma- quence of sharp temperature declines during thaws tion of extracellular ice, which causes cell dehydra- in February and March which cause trees to break tion and disruption of cell membranes (Zwiazek deep dormancy.