DOCSLIB.ORG

Nikolai Evreinov and Boris Aronson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nikolai Evreinov and Boris Aronson Experiment/3Kcnepmrem, 1 (1995), 291-96. AlLISON COMINS-RICHMOND NIKOLAI EVREINOV AND BORIS ARONSON The playwright and director Nikolai Nikolaevich Evreinov (1879- 1953) was a leading figure of the Russian bohemia in the 1910s (Fig. 102).1 Close to painters and poets such as Sergei Sudeikin and Mikhail Kuzmin, Evreinov achieved his early theatrical success as an organizer and dramatist for the St. Petersburg cabarets, especially The Crooked Mirror (active 1908-18). In spite of, or rather because of, his multifarious literary and visual experiments, Evreinov's work can be characterized as "theatri­ cal"-as the result of a conscious endeavor to involve and integrate the formal devices that underscore the fact that a play is indeed a play and not a part of life. At the same time, Evreinov believed firmly that "theatri­ cality" should be as much a part of everyday life as of the theater itself. Reacting sharply against the conventions of Realist theater as summarized by the Moscow Art Theater, Evreinov paid close attention to the elements and characters of the Commedia deii'Arte, espedally to the manipulation of music, pantomime, and acrobatics. Not surprisingly, therefore, Evreinov favored theatrical miniatures rather than long dramatic spectacles and often staged short comic plays at The Crooked Mirror, something that developed into his concept of the "monodrama". According to one observer, Evreinov's monodrama de­ pended upon "the world seeing the world as the hero does, each member of the audience becomes the hero, and thus becomes the main actor of the play.... [Moreover} everything on stage must assist with the audience's process of identification. Therefore, he asks that the presentation of the play be limited to one viewpoint. The audience must literally see what the protagonist sees and exactly how he sees it. "2 Perhaps the most intriguing example of this innovative form was Evreinov's intimate play called V kulisakh dushi [In the Sidescenes of the Soul] (1908) where the audience, placed inside the protagonist's body, experienced his emotions directly by viewing and hearing the beating of the gigantic heart and the vibration of the searing nerves. But Evreinov could think in terms of vast spatial 1 . For information on Evreinov, see S. Golub, Evreinov: The Theatre of Paradox and Transformation (Ann Arbor: UMI, 1984); S. Carnicke, The Theatrical Instinct: Nikolai Evreinov and the Russian Theatre of the Early Twentieth Century (New York: lang, 1989. 2. Carnicke, Theatrical Instinct, p. 73. ,, 292 Experimentj3KcnepHMeFIT dimensions, too. In 1920, for example, he staged what proved to be his largest and most ambitious production, i.e., The Storming of the Winter Palace. 3 With a cast of thousands, this monumental work reenacted the crucial event:that signalled the onslaught of the October Revolution. Evreinov is best remembered as a playwright for four plays in particu­ lar, i.e., the trilogy Samoe glavnoe [The Main Thing; sometimes translated as The Chief Thing. 1921] (Fig .. 103 ), Korabl. pravednykh [The Ship of the Righteous, 1925; sometimes transiC\ted as The Ship of Saint~ and The Nave of the Righteous], and Teatr vechnoi voiny [The Theater of Eternal War; sometimes translated as The Unasked Ball, 192fJ), and Veselaia smert (A Merry Death, 1908]. But Evreinov is also remembered for his astute works on the history and theory of theater, especially his idiosyncratic philosophy of theater promulgated in Teatr kak takovoi [The Theater as Such, 1913), the three-volume Teatr dlia sebia (Theater for Itself, 1915- 17], and Teatr u zhivotnykh [The Theater and Animals, 1924]. After emigra-ting in 1925, Evreinov settled in Paris and continued to stage his plays and publish his essays in the United States and Europe. The designer and illustrator Boris Solomonovich Aronson (1900-80) studied at the Kiev Art Institute before taking lessons from Alexandra Exter also ifl Kiev-whose radical Cubist style left an indelible imprint on his work. 4 In 1921 Aronson moved to Moscow where he worked on sets and costumes for productions at the Yiddish Chamber Theater. After a short residence in Berlin, Aronson settled in the United States in 1923 and soon achieved renown as a stage designer. In 1926 he chaperoned Evreinov and his wife in New York and illustrated the English-language edition of The Theatre in Life (Fig. 104). In 1926-27 he had two one-man shows in New York City, and was active as a stage designer for many enterprises until the end of his life, including the Metropolitan Opera, his last commission being a production of the Nutcracker in 1977. **** 3. The Storming of the Winter Palace premiered on November 7, 1920, and involved 8000 actors, 500 musicians, and 150,000 spectators. For further information on this production, see N •. Evreinov, "Vziatie Zimnego dvortsa,' Krasnyi militsioner (Moscow), No. 14, Noy. 15, 1920, pp. 4-5; and Golub, Evreinov, pp.. 191-208. 4. For information on Aronson, see F. Rich and l. Aronson, [he, Theatre Art of Boris Aronson (New York: Knopf, 1987). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction Commedia Dell’Arte: History, Myth, Reception Daniele Vianello
    Introduction Commedia dell’Arte: History, Myth, Reception Daniele Vianello Today, the commedia dell’arte is widely regarded as one of the most significant phenomena in the history of European theatre. Its famous stock characters, which have become an integral part of the collective imagin- ation, are widely accepted as the very emblem of theatre. From the second half of the twentieth century onwards, the commedia dell’arte has been the subject of substantial research, mostly by Italian scholars, who have re-evaluated its characteristic features and constitutive elements. These studies remain largely untranslated in English. Further- more, there are no publications which provide a comprehensive overview of this complex phenomenon or which reconstruct not only its history but also its fortunes over time and space. An historical overview was published by Kenneth and Laura Richards in , but this is now considered dated. More recent studies are limited to the discussion of specific issues or to particular geographical areas or periods of time. For example, Robert Henke (), Anne MacNeil () and M. A. Katritzky () analyse individual aspects between the late Renaissance and the early seventeenth century. The Routledge Companion to Commedia dell’Arte (Chaffee and Crick ) has the practitioner rather than the scholar in focus. In Italy, Roberto Tessari () and Siro Ferrone (), in their important recent contributions focus almost exclusively on the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The main purpose of this book is to retrace the history of the improvvisa in light of its legendary past, with special focus on the theatrical practices and theoretical deliberations in the century which has just ended.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performative Nature of Dramatic Imagination
    PERFORMANCE PHILOSOPHY E-ISSN 2237-2660 The Performative Nature of Dramatic Imagination Rubén Vega BalbásI IUniversidad Nebrija – Madrid, Spain ABSTRACT – The Performative Nature of Dramatic Imagination – Creative imagination is a central concept in critical philosophy which establishes the framing faculty of the subject in the middle of the cognitive process. Linking the internal and the external, imagination is also key for dramatic acting methodologies. This mediation has been alternatively interpreted in Western tradition under a reversible perspective, giving priority to either the process that goes from the outside inwards (aesthesis) or just the opposite (poiesis). Going beyond dialectics, this article will connect philosophy with dramatic theory. My proposal explores the virtual drama of identity to emphasise how the transcendental and empirical get linked theatrically. Keywords: Imagination. Drama. Performance. Acting. Performance Philosophy. RÉSUMÉ – La Nature Performatif de l’Imagination Créatice – L’imagination créatrice est un concept central de la philosophie critique qui établit la faculté de cadrage du sujet, dans la mesure où elle joue le rôle de médiateur entre le monde mental et le monde matériel, au milieu du processus cognitif. Liant l’imaginaire à l’externe, l’imagination est également essentielle pour les méthodologies du jeu dramatique. Cette médiation a été interprétée alternativement dans la tradition occidentale selon une perspective réversible, en donnant la priorité soit au processus allant de l’extérieur vers l’intérieur (aesthesis), soit au contraire (la poiesis). Au-delà de la dialectique, cet article associera la philosophie à la théorie dramatique. Ma thèse explore le drame virtuel de l’identité et, si l’imagination et les actes performatifs dépendent les uns des autres en tant que poursuites humaines, avec le terme dramatisation je souligne comment le transcendantal et l’empirique sont liés théâtralement.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Communism for Children: Fables and Posters of the Revolution
    boundary 2 Translating Communism for Children: Fables and Posters of the Revolution Serguei Alex. Oushakine The bourgeoisie knew all too well the importance of children’s litera- ture as a useful tool for strengthening its own dominance. The bourgeoisie did all it could to make sure that our children began as early as possible to absorb the ideas that later would turn them into slaves. We should not forget that the same tools, the same weapons, can be used for the opposite goal. —L. Kormchii, Zabytoe oruzhie: O detskoi knige (Forgotten Weapon: On Children’s Books [1918]) I am grateful to Nergis Ertürk and Özge Serin for the invitation to join this project, and for their insightful comments and suggestions. I also want to thank Marina Balina, David Bellos, Alexei Golubev, Bradley Gorski, Yuri Leving, Maria Litovskaia, Katherine M. H. Reischl, and Kim Lane Scheppele, who read and commented on earlier drafts of this article. My special thanks to Helena Goscilo, without whom this text would look quite different. I am indebted to Thomas F. Keenan, Ilona Kiss, Mikhail Karasik, and Anna Loginova for their help with obtaining visual materials, and I am thankful to the follow- ing institutions for their permission to use images: the Russian Digital Children’s Library (http://arch.rgdb.ru); the Cotsen Children’s Library, Department of Rare Books and Spe- cial Collections, Princeton University Library; and Ne Boltai: A Collection of Twentieth- Century Propaganda (http://www.neboltai.org). All translations of Russian sources are mine, unless otherwise noted. boundary 2 43:3 (2016) DOI 10.1215/01903659- 3572478 © 2016 by Duke University Press Published by Duke University Press boundary 2 160 boundary 2 / August 2016 We will create a fascinating world of “cultural adventures,” inven- tions, struggles, and victories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spectator and Dialogues of Power in Early Soviet Theater By
    Directed Culture: The Spectator and Dialogues of Power in Early Soviet Theater By Howard Douglas Allen A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Victoria E. Bonnell, Chair Professor Ann Swidler Professor Yuri Slezkine Fall 2013 Abstract Directed Culture: The Spectator and Dialogues of Power in Early Soviet Theater by Howard Douglas Allen Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Berkeley Professor Victoria E. Bonnell, Chair The theater played an essential role in the making of the Soviet system. Its sociological interest not only lies in how it reflected contemporary society and politics: the theater was an integral part of society and politics. As a preeminent institution in the social and cultural life of Moscow, the theater was central to transforming public consciousness from the time of 1905 Revolution. The analysis of a selected set of theatrical premieres from the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 to the end of Cultural Revolution in 1932 examines the values, beliefs, and attitudes that defined Soviet culture and the revolutionary ethos. The stage contributed to creating, reproducing, and transforming the institutions of Soviet power by bearing on contemporary experience. The power of the dramatic theater issued from artistic conventions, the emotional impact of theatrical productions, and the extensive intertextuality between theatrical performances, the press, propaganda, politics, and social life. Reception studies of the theatrical premieres address the complex issue of the spectator’s experience of meaning—and his role in the construction of meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Evreinov and Questions of Theatricality
    Evreinov and Questions of Theatricality Inga Romantsova BA (Theatre and Film) St Petersburg State Theatre Arts Academy; MA (Theatre and Film) University of New South Wales A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Drama November 2017 This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship I hereby certify that the work embodied in the thesis is my own work, conducted under normal supervision. The thesis contains no material which has been accepted, or is being examined, for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other university or other tertiary institute and to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University’s Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 and any approved embargo. Inga Romantsova Declaration of Transliteration I, Inga Romantsova, Australian citizen born in Voronezh, Russia, hereby declare that I am fluent in both the English and Russian languages and the translations and transliterations provided in this dissertation are true and accurate. The transcriptions from Russian (Cyrillic) into English are based on the 'Modified Library of Congress' system, widely used by all major libraries in the UK and the USA. Abstract As a professional actor I have always been puzzled by the question of what drives our desire for acting. Russian theatre practitioner of the 20th Century Nikolai Evreinov preconceived or intuitively searched for an answer to that exact same question, and he believed he found it.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatrical Spectatorship in the United States and Soviet Union, 1921-1936: a Cognitive Approach to Comedy, Identity, and Nation
    Theatrical Spectatorship in the United States and Soviet Union, 1921-1936: A Cognitive Approach to Comedy, Identity, and Nation Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Pamela Decker, MA Graduate Program in Theatre The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Lesley Ferris, Advisor Jennifer Schlueter Frederick Luis Aldama Copyright by Pamela Decker 2013 Abstract Comedy is uniquely suited to reveal a specific culture’s values and identities; we understand who we are by what and whom we laugh at. This dissertation explores how comic spectatorship reflects modern national identity in four theatre productions from the twentieth century’s two rising superpowers: from the Soviet Union, Evgeny Vakhtangov’s production of Princess Turandot (1922) and Vsevolod Meyerhold’s production of The Bedbug (1929); from the United States, Eubie Blake and Noble Sissle’s Broadway production of Shuffle Along (1921) and Orson Welles’ Federal Theatre Project production of Horse Eats Hat (1936). I undertake a historical and cognitive analysis of each production, revealing that spectatorship plays a participatory role in the creation of live theatre, which in turn illuminates moments of emergent national identities. By investigating these productions for their impact on spectatorship rather than the literary merit of the dramatic text, I examine what the spectator’s role in theatre can reveal about the construction of national identity, and what cognitive studies can tell us about the spectator’s participation in live theatre performance. Theatre scholarship often marginalizes the contribution of the spectator; this dissertation privileges the body as the first filter of meaning and offers new insights into how spectators contribute and shape live theatre, as opposed to being passive observers of an ii already-completed production.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Theatre. 71
    “The Theatrical Pendulum: Paths of Innovation in the Modernist Stage” by Andrés Pérez-Simón A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Comparative Literature University of Toronto © Copyright by Andrés Pérez-Simón, 2010 “The Theatrical Pendulum: Paths of Innovation in the Modernist Stage” Andrés Pérez-Simón Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Comparative Literature University of Toronto 2010 Abstract This dissertation examines the renovation of the modernist stage, from the beginning of the twentieth century to the late 1930s, via a retrieval of three artistic forms that had marginal importance in the commercial theatre of the nineteenth century. These three paths are the commedia dell’arte, puppetry and marionettes, and, finally, what I denominate mysterium, following Elinor Fuch’s terminology in The Death of Character. This dissertation covers the temporal span of the first three decades of the twentieth century and, at the same time, analyzes modernist theatre in connection with the history of Western drama since the consolidation of the bourgeois institution of theatre around the late eighteenth century. The Theatrical Pendulum: Paths of Innovation in the Modernist Staget studies the renovation of the bourgeois institution of theatre by means of the rediscovery of artistic forms previously relegated to a peripheral status in the capitalist system of artistic production and distribution. In their dramatic works, Nikolai Evreinov, Josef and Karel Čapek, Massimo Bontempelli, and Federico García Lorca present fictional actors, playwrights and directors who resist the fact that their work be evaluated as just another commodity. These dramatists collaborate with the commercial stage of their time, ii instead of adopting the radical stance that characterized avant-garde movements such as Italian futurism and Dadaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Art of the Avant-Garde
    Russian Art of the Avant-Garde THE DOCUMENTS OF 20TH-CENTURY ART ROBERT MOTHERWELL, General Editor BERNARD KARPEL, Documentary Editor ARTHUR A. COHEN Managing Editor Russian Art of the Avant-Garde Theory and Criticism 1902-1934 Edited and Translated by John E. Bowlt Printed in U.S.A. Acknowledgments: Harvard University Press and Lund Humphries Publishers Ltd.: "Realistic Manifesto" from Gabo by Naum Gabo. Copyright © 1957 by Lund Humphries. Reprinted by permission. Thames and Hudson Ltd.: "Suprematism in World Reconstruction, 1920" by El Lissitsky. This collection of published statements by Russian artists and critics is in- tended to fill a considerable gap in our general knowledge of the ideas and theories peculiar to modernist Russian art, particularly within the context of painting. Although monographs that present the general chronological framework of the Russian avant-garde are available, most observers have comparatively little idea of the principal theoretical intentions of such move- ments as symbolism, neoprimitivism, rayonism, and constructivism. In gen- eral, the aim of this volume is to present an account of the Russian avant- garde by artists themselves in as lucid and as balanced a way as possible. While most of the essays of Vasilii Kandinsky and Kazimir Malevich have already been translated into English, the statements of Mikhail Larionov, Natalya Goncharova, and such little-known but vital figures as Vladimir Markov and Aleksandr Shevchenko have remained inaccessible to the wider public either in Russian or in English. A similar situation has prevailed with regard to the Revolutionary period, when such eminent critics and artists as Anatolii Lunacharsky, Nikolai Punin, and David Shterenberg were in the forefront of artistic ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolai Evreinov and Edith Craig As Mediums of Modernist Sensibility', New Theatre Quarterly, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Nikolai Evreinov and Edith Craig as Mediums of Modernist Sensibility Citation for published version: Smith, A 2010, 'Nikolai Evreinov and Edith Craig as Mediums of Modernist Sensibility', New theatre quarterly, vol. 26, no. 103, pp. 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X10000412 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1017/S0266464X10000412 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: New theatre quarterly Publisher Rights Statement: © Smith, A. (2010). Nikolai Evreinov and Edith Craig as Mediums of Modernist Sensibility. New theatre quarterly, 26(103), 203-216doi: 10.1017/S0266464X10000412 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 New Theatre Quarterly http://journals.cambridge.org/NTQ Additional services for New Theatre Quarterly: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Nikolai Evreinov and Edith Craig as Mediums of Modernist Sensibility Alexandra Smith New Theatre Quarterly / Volume 26 / Issue 03 / August 2010, pp 203 ­ 216 DOI: 10.1017/S0266464X10000412, Published online: 11 August 2010 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0266464X10000412 How to cite this article: Alexandra Smith (2010).
    [Show full text]
  • The Theatre of Paradox and Transformation. by Spencer Golub
    FALLOW m Eweinov: The Theatre of Paradox and Transformation. By Spencer Golub. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1984. xx + 307 + illus. The Theatrical Instinct Nikolai Eweinov and the Russian Theatre of the Early Twentieth Century. By Sharon Marie Carnicke. New York: Peter Lang, 1989. xii + 247 + fflus. The theatrical career of Russian playwright and director Nikolai Evreinov (1879-1953) has for too long been obscured by the long shadows of his countrymen, Constantin Stanislavsky and Vsevolod Meyerhold. But this oversight has been largely rectified by two recent books: Spencer Golub's Evreinov: The Theatre of Paradox and Transformation and Sharon Marie Carnicke's The Theatrical Instinct Nikolai Evreinov and the Russian Theatre of the Twentieth Century. Best known to international audiences for his play The Main Thing, produced in many languages since the 1920's, Evreinov's other plays (including The Fourth Wall, A Merry Death, and The Theatre of the Soul), and his significant contributions as a director, have been much less known. Active in the pre-Revolutionary theatres of St. Petersburg, Evreinov viewed theatre as "illusion (lies like truth) and theatre as an event (a present- tense reality transcending the boundaries of art)" (Golub xviii). In his own plays, and as a director of works by other authors, he used highly theatrical elements from carnival and commedia deWarte. In fact, he identified strongly with his own central characters in whom he combined "the trickster and the saint in the person of the Harlequin-Christ" (Golub 77). As Evreinov himself wrote, "even from childhood the image of Harlequin became mine" (Carnicke 95), and the traditions and characters of the commedia, a prevalent source for many early twentieth century artists, especially in Russia, had a profound impact on Evreinov's work.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Dada 1914–1924
    Russian Dada 1914–1924 DATES: 5 June – 22 October 2018 PLACE: Sabatini building, Floor 1 ORGANIZATION: Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madrid CURATOR: Margarita Tupitsyn COORDINATION: Leticia Sastre and Sofía Cuadrado RELATED Heterodoxias radicales de Dadá. Curso de Servando Rocha. ACTIVITIES: 7, 8, 12, 14 y 15 june, 2018-19:00h / Nouvel builiding, With the support of abertis Russian Dada 1914-1924 is an exhibition organised by the Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía which, for the first time, looks at Russian avant-garde art from the perspective of the canons of the Dada movement and explores the features of innovation and artistic agitation shared by both trends. Despite the fact that the term "futurism" has been used to refer to the first Russian avant-garde and although most canonical narratives situate Dada's irruption in different western cities (Zurich, Paris, Berlin or New York), the discourse of this exhibition curated is oriented towards paying due attention to the artistic context of pre and post- revolutionary Russia and to claiming the leading role of the creators of the Slavic country in the aesthetic radicalism of the Dada. Thus, as a result of painstaking research and the recovery of a significant amount of unreleased material, some 500 works will go on display, including 250 paintings, collages and drawings; 73 photographs; 150 documents and publications, and 22 films and audio pieces. The aforementioned works were produced at the height of the Dada movement — between the First World War and the death of Lenin in 1924 — by nearly 90 artists from Russia and other European countries, such as Natan Altman, Ivan Kluin, Gustav Klutsis, Valentina Kulagina, El Lisitzki, Kazimir Malevich, Vladimir Mayakovsky, Ivan Puni, Aleksandr Rodchenko, Olga Rozanova, Varvara Stepanova, Vladimir Tatlin, Ilia Zdanevich, Natalia Goncharova, and Francis Picabia, Kurt Schwitters, Man Ray and Tristan Tzara, among numerous others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socialist Construction of the Moscow Theater Festival 1933-1937
    The Socialist Construction of the Moscow Theater Festival 1933-1937 A thesis submitted by Michael Leonard Kersey Morris In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Drama TUFTS UNIVERSITY November 2012 © 2012, Michael Morris Adviser: Laurence Senelick UMI Number: 1531301 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 1531301 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 ii ABSTRACT From 1933 through 1937, the Soviet Union invited foreigners to experience the best of Soviet theater at the Moscow Theater Festival. This thesis focuses on the festival as both an object of and vehicle for socialist construction. The first chapter explores the event as an economic activity through a consideration of the capitalist methods employed to sell the festival. The second chapter examines how the organizers focused on the festival’s increasing cultural and political significance when planning it. The final chapter reflects on the attendees’ responses to their experiences. The conclusion compares the festival to another project of socialist construction—the building of the Moscow subway— and to the Nazi Olympics of 1936.
    [Show full text]