DOCSLIB.ORG

Snapper Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Snapper Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region Final AMENDMENT 13A TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SNAPPER GROUPER FISHERY OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC REGION INCLUDING AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS, REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT/ FISHERY IMPACT STATEMENT October 2003 South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 1 Southpark Circle, Suite 306 Charleston, South Carolina 29407-4699 (843) 571-4366 / FAX (843) 769-4520 Toll Free: 866-SAFMC-10 email: [email protected] This is a publication of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA03NMF4410030 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................vi PROPOSED ACTION AND PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE............................................. viii ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .....................................................................................ix REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW........................................................................................x SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT/FISHERY IMPACT STATEMENT.............................xiv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Background.....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Action.....................................................................................6 1.2.1 Purpose...............................................................................................................6 1.2.2 Need for Action..................................................................................................6 1.3 Scoping, Environmental Documentation and Key Issues Associated with the Proposed Action.........................................................................................................8 1.3.1 Scoping...............................................................................................................8 1.3.2 Environmental Documenation ...........................................................................8 1.3.3 Key Issues ..........................................................................................................9 1.3.4 The Scope of Alternatives..................................................................................9 1.4 Management Objectives of the Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plan.........10 1.5 History of Management ...........................................................................................12 2.0 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION.......................................26 2.1 Features of Alternatives Considered in Detail...............................................................26 2.2 Comparison of the Impacts Between Alternatives 1-5 and the No Action Alternative.27 2.3 Comparison of the Impacts Between Alternatives 1-5 ..................................................28 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT........................................................................................29 3.1 Description of the Fishery/Affected Environment...................................................29 3.1.1 Physical Environment ......................................................................................29 3.1.1.1 Geological Environment ..........................................................................29 3.1.1.2 Oceanographic Environment....................................................................31 3.1.2 Biological Environment...................................................................................32 3.1.2.1 Habitat......................................................................................................32 3.1.2.2 Species in the Snapper Grouper FMU .....................................................35 3.1.2.2.1 Snappers, Lutjanidae..........................................................................37 3.1.2.2.1.1 Vermilion Snapper.....................................................................37 3.1.2.2.1.2 Silk Snapper...............................................................................38 3.1.2.2.1.3 Red Snapper...............................................................................39 3.1.2.2.1.4 Blackfin Snapper .......................................................................40 3.1.2.2.1.5 Queen Snapper...........................................................................40 i Snapper Grouper Amendment 13A 3.1.2.2.2 Grouper, Hinds, and Sea Basses, Serranidae.....................................41 3.1.2.2.2.1 Groupers ....................................................................................41 3.1.2.2.2.1.1 Gag Grouper ......................................................................41 3.1.2.2.2.1.2 Scamp ................................................................................42 3.1.2.2.2.1.3 Snowy Grouper..................................................................43 3.1.2.2.2.1.4 Yellowedge Grouper..........................................................44 3.1.2.2.2.1.5 Warsaw Grouper................................................................45 3.1.2.2.2.1.6 Speckled Hind....................................................................45 3.1.2.2.2.1.7 Misty Grouper....................................................................46 3.1.2.2.2.2 Sea Basses..................................................................................47 3.1.2.2.2.2.1 Black Sea Bass...................................................................47 3.1.2.2.2.2.2 Bank Sea Bass....................................................................48 3.1.2.2.3 Tilefish, Malacanthidae .....................................................................48 3.1.2.2.3.1 Golden Tilefish..........................................................................48 3.1.2.2.3.2 Blueline Tilefish ........................................................................49 3.1.2.2.4 Jack, Carangidae................................................................................49 3.1.2.2.4.1 Greater Amberjack.....................................................................49 3.1.2.2.4.2 Lesser Amberjack......................................................................50 3.1.2.2.4.3 Almaco Jack...............................................................................50 3.1.2.2.4.4 Crevalle Jack..............................................................................51 3.1.2.2.5 Porgies, Sparidae ...............................................................................51 3.1.2.2.5.1 Red Porgy ..................................................................................52 3.1.2.2.5.2 Jolthead Porgy ...........................................................................52 3.1.2.2.5.3 Knobbed Porgy..........................................................................53 3.1.2.3 Other Affected Species ............................................................................53 3.1.2.3.1 Finfish and Invertebrates not Included in the Snapper Grouper FMU .............................................................................................53 3.1.2.3.2 Protected and Candidate Species..................................................54 3.1.2.3.2.1 Whales .......................................................................................54 3.1.2.3.2.2 Turtles........................................................................................54 3.1.2.3.2.3 Candidate Species......................................................................54 3.1.2.4 Administrative Environment....................................................................55 3.1.2.4.1 The Fishery Management Process and Applicable Laws..................55 3.1.2.4.1.1 Federal Fishery Management ....................................................55 3.1.2.4.1.2 State Fishery Management ........................................................55 3.1.2.4.2 Enforcement.......................................................................................56 3.1.2.4.3 Science Underlying the Management of Snapper Grouper Species and the Establishment of the Oculina Experimental Closed Area....57 3.1.2.4.4 Data Collection and Research in the Oculina Experimental Closed Area...................................................................................................59 3.2 Description of the Fishery........................................................................................67 3.2.1 Fishing Methods...............................................................................................67 3.2.1.1 Recreational Fishery ................................................................................67 3.2.1.2 For-Hire Fishery.......................................................................................67 3.2.1.3 Commercial Fishery.................................................................................68 3.2.2 Economic Description of the Fishery...............................................................70 3.2.2.1 Description of the Economic Benefits .....................................................70
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Extensions and Applications of Mean Length Mortality Estimators for Assessment of Data-Limited Fisheries
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2017 Extensions and Applications of Mean Length Mortality Estimators for Assessment of Data-Limited Fisheries Quang C. Huynh College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Huynh, Quang C., "Extensions and Applications of Mean Length Mortality Estimators for Assessment of Data-Limited Fisheries" (2017). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1516639583. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/V5CM9D This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Extensions and applications of mean length mortalit y estimators for assessment of data - limited fisheries A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Quang C . Huynh January 2018 APPROVAL PAGE This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Quang C . Huynh Approved by the Committee, December, 2017 John M. Hoenig, Ph.D. Committee Chair/ Advisor Mark J. Brush, Ph.D. John E. Graves, Ph.D. Ross J. Iaci, Ph.D. Department of Mathematics John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • MRAG South Atlantic PSA Draft Report
    South Atlantic Species Productivity – Susceptibility Analyses Draft Report To the Lenfest Ocean Program MRAG Americas 65 Eastern Avenue, Unit B2C Essex, MA 01929 Ph. 978-768-3880 Fax. 978-768-3878 www.mragamericas.com August 27, 2008 Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Risk Based Assessment ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Information Collection ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 A Note about our Productivity Susceptibility Analysis Methodology................................................ 3 2 Non Snapper/Grouper Species ............................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Pink Shrimp, Penaeus [Farfantepenaeus] duorarum ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Snapper/Grouper Complex .................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Groupers .......................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Snapper.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Red Snapper Management and Seafood Transparency in the Southeastern United States
    IMPROVING RED SNAPPER MANAGEMENT AND SEAFOOD TRANSPARENCY IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES Erin Taylor Spencer A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Environment, Ecology, and Energy Program in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: John Bruno Joel Fodrie Leah Gerber © 2019 Erin Taylor Spencer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Erin Taylor Spencer: Improving Red Snapper Management and Seafood Transparency in the Southeastern United States (Under the direction of John F. Bruno) Robust, accurate data about fish harvest is essential to developing sustainable policies that protect stocks while supporting the fishing and seafood industries. Unfortunately, there are large gaps in knowledge regarding how many fish are caught and what happens to those fish once they reach the dock. My thesis addresses two issues facing the snapper grouper fishery in the Southeastern United States: lack of data in recreational fisheries and the rate of seafood mislabeling. First, I investigated the rate of seafood mislabeling of red snapper using DNA barcoding. I found 72.6% of samples were mislabeled, indicating widespread mislabeling of red snapper on the South Atlantic coast. Second, I surveyed recreational anglers to assess perceptions of electronic reporting and found positive views of using apps and websites to report catch. These results inform fishers, consumers, and managers, and help facilitate the development of sustainable fisheries policies. iii To my family, given and chosen, whose support of my academic adventures has never wavered.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Life History Characteristics of Silk Snapper, Queen Snapper, and Redtail Parrotfish
    A review of the life history characteristics of silk snapper, queen snapper, and redtail parrotfish Meaghan D. Bryan, Maria del Mar Lopez, and Britni Tokotch SEDAR26-DW-01 Date Submitted: 11 May 2011 SEDAR26 – DW - 01 A review of the life history characteristics of silk snapper, queen snapper, and redtail parrotfish by Meaghan D. Bryan1, Maria del Mar Lopez2, and Britni Tokotch2 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) 1Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SFSC) Sustainable Fisheries Division (SFD) Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Assessment Unit 75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, Florida 33149 2Southeast Regional Office Sustainable Fisheries Division (SFD) Caribbean Operations Branch 263 13th Avenue South St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 May 2011 Caribbean Southeast Data Assessment Review Workshop Report SEDAR26-DW-01 Sustainable Fisheries Division Contribution No. SFD-2011-008 1 Introduction The purpose of this report is to review and assemble life history information for Etelis oculatus (queen snapper), Lutjanus vivanus (silk snapper), and Sparisoma chrysopterum (redtail parrotfish) in the US Caribbean. Photos of the three species can be found in Figures 1-3. Life history information for these species was synthesized from published work in the grey and primary literature, as well as FishBase (Froese and Pauly 2011). Given the paucity of available information for redtail parrotfish, the review was widened to include Sparisoma viride (stoplight parrotfish), Sparisoma aurofrenatum (redband parrotfish), Sparisoma rubripinne (redfin parrotfish), and Scarus vetula (queen parrotfish). The report is organized by species and each section focuses on key aspects describing the relationships among age, growth and reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-622 Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries By Flávia C. Tonioli Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway University of Miami Miami, Florida 33149 Juan J. Agar Social Science Research Group National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Dr. Miami, Florida 33149 September 2011 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-622 Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries Flávia C. Tonioli Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies University of Miami 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, Florida 33149 Juan J. Agar Social Science Research Group National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Dr. Miami, Florida 33149 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rebecca Blank, Acting Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Jane Lubchenco, Undersecretary for Oceans and Atmosphere NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Eric C. Schwaab, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries September 2011 This Technical Memorandum series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or similar special-purpose information. Although the memoranda are not subject to complete formal review, editorial control, or detailed editing, they are expected to reflect sound professional work. NOTICE The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, recommend or endorse any proprietary product or material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to NMFS or to this publication furnished by NMFS, in any advertising or sales promotion which would imply that NMFS approves, recommends, or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein which has as its purpose any intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this NMFS publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Puerto Rico DEIS December 2017 161St Caribbean Council Meeting
    Draft Actions and Alternatives Puerto Rico DEIS December 2017 161st Caribbean Council Meeting 2.1 Action 1: Determine the Species to be Included for Management in the Puerto Rico Fishery Management Plan (FMP) Proposed Alternatives for Action 1 Alternative 1. No action. The Puerto Rico FMP is composed of all species within the fishery management units (FMUs) presently managed under the Spiny Lobster FMP, Reef Fish FMP, Queen Conch FMP, and the Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates (Coral) FMP. Alternative 2 (Preliminary Preferred). For those species for which landings data are available, indicating the species is in the fishery, the Caribbean Fishery Management Council (Council) will follow a stepwise application of a set of criteria to determine if a species should be managed under the Puerto Rico FMP. The criteria under consideration include, in order: Criterion A. Include for management those species that are presently classified as overfished in U.S. Caribbean federal waters based on NMFS determination, or for which historically identified harvest is now prohibited due to their ecological importance as habitat (corals presently included in the Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates FMP) or habitat engineers (midnight, blue, rainbow parrotfish), or those species for which seasonal closures or size limits apply. Table 2.1.1. Draft list of species proposed to be included in the Puerto Rico Fishery Management Plan based on Alternative 2, Criterion A. Family Scientific Name Common Name Apsilus dentatus Black snapper
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, a New Species of Snapper
    Zootaxa 1422: 31–43 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of snapper (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) from Brazil, with comments on the distribution of Lutjanus griseus and L. apodus RODRIGO L. MOURA1 & KENYON C. LINDEMAN2 1Conservation International Brasil, Programa Marinho, Rua das Palmeiras 451 Caravelas BA 45900-000 Brazil E-mail:[email protected] 2Environmental Defense, 485 Glenwood Avenue, Satellite Beach, FL, 32937 USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Snappers of the family Lutjanidae contain several of the most important reef-fishery species in the tropical western Atlantic. Despite their importance, substantial gaps exist for both systematic and ecological information, especially for the southwestern Atlantic. Recent collecting efforts along the coast of Brazil have resulted in the discovery of many new reef-fish species, including commercially important parrotfishes (Scaridae) and grunts (Haemulidae). Based on field col- lecting, museum specimens, and literature records, we describe a new species of snapper, Lutjanus alexandrei, which is apparently endemic to the Brazilian coast. The newly settled and early juvenile life stages are also described. This spe- cies is common in many Brazilian reef and coastal estuarine systems where it has been often misidentified as the gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus, or the schoolmaster, L. apodus. Identification of the new species cast doubt on prior distribu- tional assumptions about the southern ranges of L. griseus and L. apodus, and subsequent field and museum work con- firmed that those species are not reliably recorded in Brazil. The taxonomic status of two Brazilian species previously referred to Lutjanus, Bodianus aya and Genyoroge canina, is reviewed to determine the number of valid Lutjanus species occurring in Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 208/Friday, October 28, 2005/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 208 / Friday, October 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 62073 the Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform nurse staffing data. This final rule will (A) Clear and readable format. Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), and have no consequential effect on the (B) In a prominent place readily Executive Order 13132. Executive Order governments mentioned or on the accessible to residents and visitors. 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs private sector. (3) Public access to posted nurse and benefits of available regulatory Executive Order 13132 establishes staffing data. The facility must, upon alternatives and, if regulation is certain requirements that an agency oral or written request, make nurse necessary, to select regulatory must meet when it promulgates a staffing data available to the public for approaches that maximize net benefits proposed rule (and subsequent final review at a cost not to exceed the (including potential economic, rule) that imposes substantial direct community standard. environmental, public health and safety requirement costs on State and local (4) Facility data retention effects, distributive impacts, and governments, preempts State law, or requirements. The facility must equity). A regulatory impact analysis otherwise has Federalism implications. maintain the posted daily nurse staffing (RIA) must be prepared for major rules Since this regulation will not impose data for a minimum of 18 months, or as with economically significant effects any costs on State or local governments, required by State law, whichever is ($100 million or more in any one year). the requirements of Executive Order greater. This rule does not reach the economic 13132 are not applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Lutjanus Vivanus (Cuvier, 1828) LTJ Frequent Synonyms / Misidentifications: None / Lutjanus Campechanus (Poey, 1860), Lutjanus Purpureus (Poey, 1866)
    click for previous page Perciformes: Percoidei: Lutjanidae 1499 Lutjanus vivanus (Cuvier, 1828) LTJ Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / Lutjanus campechanus (Poey, 1860), Lutjanus purpureus (Poey, 1866). FAO names: En - Silk snapper; Fr - Vivaneau soie; Sp - Pargo de lo alto. Diagnostic characters: Vomer and palatines with teeth, those on vomer in anchor-shaped patch with posterior extension on median line; no teeth on ectopterygoids. Maxilla without scales. Gill rakers on first arch 6 to 9 on upper limb and 16 or 17on lower limb, total 22 to 25. Dorsal fin single, spinous portion of fin not deeply incised at its junction with soft portion. Last soft ray of both dorsal and anal fins not elongated. Anal fin angulated in specimens more than about 6 cm standard length. Caudal fin lunate. Dorsal fin with 10 spines and 14, occasionally 13, soft rays. Anal fin with 3 spines and 8, rarely 7, soft rays.Pectoral fin with 16 to 18, usually 17, rays. Membranes of soft dorsal and anal fins with scales. Tubed scales in lateral line 47 to 50. Rows of lateral scales 50 to 53, most frequently 51; scales above lateral line 10 to 12; scales below lateral line 20 to 24; sum of rows of lateral scales and scales above and below lateral line 82 to 87, rarely 81 or 88. Colour: back and upper sides red to pink;lower sides and belly lighter;body sometimes with alter- nating red and white bars; iris of eye bright yellow; dark spot below anterior part of soft dorsal fin (per- sisting to about 20 to 25 cm standard length), spot usually black, occasionally red; fins mostly reddish, dorsal and anal fins with some yellow, posterior margin of caudal fin sometimes deep red or dusky, pectoral fins pale yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Fishing Guide 2021
    Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Recreational fishing guide 2021 New rules apply from 1 July 2021 see page 3 for details Includes Statewide bag and size limits for Western Australia, and Recreational Fishing from Boat Licence information Published June 2021 Page i Important disclaimer The Director General of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. This publication is to provide assistance or information. It is only a guide and does not replace the Fish Resources Management Act 1994 or the Fish Resources Management Regulations 1995. It cannot be used as a defence in a court of law. The information provided is current at the date of printing but may be subject to change. For the most up-to-date information on fishing and full details of legislation contact select DPIRD offices or visit dpird.wa.gov.au Copyright © State of Western Australia (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development) 2021 Front cover photo: Tourism WA Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Gordon Stephenson House, 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 +61 1300 374 731 [email protected] dpird.wa.gov.au Page ii Contents Fish for the future .............................................2 Using this guide .................................................2 Changes to the rules – 2021 .............................3
    [Show full text]
  • Local Ecological and Taxonomic Knowledge of Snapper Fish (Teleostei: Actinopterygii) Held by Fishermen in Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 7(3):403-414, 2009 Copyright © 2009 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Local ecological and taxonomic knowledge of snapper fish (Teleostei: Actinopterygii) held by fishermen in Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil Camilla Fahning Ferreira Caló1, Alexandre Schiavetti2 and Mauricio Cetra3 Local Ecological and Taxonomic Knowledge (LEK) of fish held by fishermen in the municipality of Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil, known as the snapper (“vermelho”) was examined from August 2005 to November 2006. Semi-structured interviews and tests were made with fishermen selected under the criteria of “specialists”. The data analysis followed the union model of the different individual competences. Grouping analysis was performed on data referring to the localities of the occurrence of these fish, depth, coloration, and morphological characteristics of the species using the Pearson correlation coefficient (UPGMA). A total of 19 species were named within the snapper group, although three of them could not be scientifically identified. The Lutjanidae family presented the greatest numbers of species (n = 9). Other families mentioned were: the Serranidae (n = 3), Holocentridae (n = 2), Priacanthidae (n = 1), Mullidae (n = 1). The 1:1 correspondence between fishermen’s local names and scientific species observed in this study indicates the richness of local fishermen knowledge. Analysis of the LEK related to the feeding habits of these fish and indicated that most were considered as being carnivorous, which agrees with the specialized literature consulted. In terms of their spatial distribution, two categories were detected: locality of occurrence (rivers/sea, coast, and offshore) and depth (surface, mid-depth, mid-depth/deep, deep). The fish were considered locally to be “winter fish”, based on harvested yields.
    [Show full text]