July21, August, 18, 25, September 8, 15, 30, October 14, 27, 2003 Los Angeles, California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

July21, August, 18, 25, September 8, 15, 30, October 14, 27, 2003 Los Angeles, California California State Archives State Government Oral History Program Oral History Interview with JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP District Attorney, County ofLos Angeles, 1975-1983 Attorney General, State ofCalifornia, 1983-1991 July21, August, 18, 25, September 8, 15, 30, October 14, 27, 2003 Los Angeles, California By Susan Douglass Yates Oral History Program University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles RESTRICTIONS ON THIS INTERVIEW None. LITERARY RIGHTS AND QUOTATION This manuscript is hereby made available forresearch purposes only. No partof themanuscript maybe quoted for publication without thewritten permission of the California State Archivistor the Head,Department of Special Collections, CharlesE. Young Research Library, UCLA. Requests forpermission to quote for publication should be addressed to: California State Archives 1020 O Street, Room 130 Sacramento, CA 94814 or Department ofSpecial Collections Charles E. Young Research Library P.O. Box 951575 UCLA Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Therequest should include identification of the specific passages and identification ofthe user. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: John K. Van de Kamp, OralHistory Interview, Conducted 2003 by Susan Douglass Yates, UCLA Oral History Program, for the California State Archives State Government Oral History Program. Secretary of State KEVIN SHELLEY State of California PREFACE On September 25, 1985, Governor George Deukmejian signed into law A.B. 2104 (Chapter 965 of the Statutes of 1985). Thislegislation established, underthe administration ofthe California State Archives, a State Government Oral History Program "toprovide through theuseoforal history a continuing documentation of state policy development asreflected in California's legislative and executive history." The following interview is one of a series oforal histories undertaken forinclusion in the state program. These interviews offer insights into theactual workings ofboth the legislative and executive processes and policy mechanisms. Theyalso offeran increasedunderstanding of the men and womenwho create legislationand implement state policy. Further, theyprovide an overview of issue development in California stategovernment and of howboththe legislative and executive branches of government deal with issues and problems facing the state. Interviewees are chosenprimarily onthe basis of their contributions to and influence onthepolicy process of the state of California. They include members of the legislative and executive branches of the state government aswell as legislative staff, advocates, members of the media, and otherpeoplewho played sigmficantroles in specific issue areas ofmajor and continuing importance to California. Byauthorizing the California State Archives to work cooperatively withoralhistory units at Californiacollegesand universities to conductinterviews, this program is structured to take advantage of the resources and expertisein oral history available through California's several institutionallybased programs. Participating as cooperation institutions in the State Government Oral History Program are: Oral History Program History Department California State University, Fullerton Oral History Program Center for California Studies California State University, Sacramento Oral History Program Claremont Graduate School Regional Oral History Office The Bancroft Library University ofCalifornia, Berkeley Oral History Program University ofCalifomia, Los Angeles The establishment ofthe Califomia State Archives State Government Oral History Program marks one ofthemost significant commitments made by anystate toward the preservation and documentation ofits governmental history. It supplements the often fi-agmentary historical written record by adding an organized primarysource, enriching the historical information available on given topics and allowing formore thorough historical analysis. As such, theprogram, through the preservation and publication ofinterviews such astheone which follows, will be of lasting value to current and future generations of scholars, citizens, and leaders. John F. Bums State Archivist July 27,1988 This interview is printed on acid-free paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTERVIEW HISTORY i BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARY iii SESSION 1, July 21, 2003 [Tape 1, SideA] 1 Familybackground—Parents Harry JosephVan de Kamp and Georgie Kalar Van de Kamp—Growing up in Altadenaduring the late thirties and early forties—Attends Trailfinders School for Boys in Altadena—^Develops an interest in conservation andpreservation through outdoor activities while at Trailfinders—More on parents—Sister Gretchen Van de Kamp—Finishes high school at John Muir Collegein Pasadena—^Mother is a Roosevelt Democrat and father is a moderate Republican—^Religious upbringing—Familytravels across the country to take Van de Kamp to Dartmouth College. [Tape!, SideB] 27 Learningto drink responsibly—^Dartmouth College—Becomes a radio announcer and station manager at the campus radio station WDBS—^Academic and extracurricular interests in college—Summer jobs include working at ABC—Joins theUnited States Attorney's Office after finishing law school and military service—^Benefits ofworking in the U.S. Attorney's Office early in career—^Van de Kamp is named interim U.S. Attorney—^Plans after completing law school—While deputy director ofthe Executive Office for United States Attorneys Van de Kamp heads special unit to look into draft violators—Overseeing Resurrection Cityand the caseof H. RapBrown—Personal thoughts about eventsofthe mid to late sixties. SESSION 2, August 18, 2003 [Tape 2, Side A] 49 In 1969 Van de Kamp begins to look into several career opportunities when Richard M. Nixon becomes president—Becomes a Democratic candidate in the 1969 special election for the Twenty-seventh Congressional District—Campaigning and raising funds—^Jesse M. Unruh—^Republican opponent Barry M. Goldwater Jr. [Tape 2, Side B] 74 More on Republican opponent Barry M. Goldwater Jr.—^More on 1969 congressional campaign—The campaign experience—After losing the 1969 election Van de Kamp decides to return to California permanently—Serves as campaign manager on Jesse Unruh's 1970 campaign for governor—More on Unruh—^Helps fnend Ed Miller in his 1970 campaign for San Diego district attorney—^Returns to Washington D.C. in the summer of1970 to work on a chapter ofthe final report issued by the President's Commission on Campus Unrest—The bi-partisan nature ofthe state legislature in the 1960s and 1970s compared to Washington, D.C.—Role ofcampaign fund-raising on increased partisanship—^Unruh'sinability to raise as much money as Ronald W. Reagan in the 1970 governor's race—Reasons for creating a federal public defender's office. [Tape 3, Side A] 97 Hiring stafffor the Los Angeles Federal Public Defender's Office—Serving as a public defender and working with defendants. SESSION 3, August 25, 2003 [Tape 4, Side A] 108 The Pheaster case—^Appointment as district attorney ofLos Angeles—Impressions ofthe District Attorney's Office in the mid-seventies—^Van de Kamp's inaugural speech addresses goals for the DA's Office—^Van de Kamp appoints Steven Trott and Andrea Ordin—Early efforts in the DA's Office to reorganize juvenile court—Cases handled by the DA's Office over the years—In response to theft and fi*aud problems in the movie industry, establishes the Entertainment Task Force. [Tape 4, SideB] 130 The Roll-out Unit is established in response to the Eulia Love incident as well as other incidents ofpolice shootings—^The Board of Supervisors—Establishes new programs and units to focus on specific issues—^Bureau ofChild Support—Improving the Bureau of Investigation—^More on new programs and units—Coming into the DA's Office as an outsider—Administrative focus. [Tape 5, Side A] 153 The 1976 Los Angeles District Attorney campaign—Opponents in the 1976 election—^Proposition 13—The 1980 campaign. SESSION 4, September 8, 2003 [Tape 6, Side A] 162 More on Van de Kamp's inaugural speech as DA—^DA's Office efforts to pursue public corruption cases—an de Kamp is a potential candidate for the FBI directorship in 1977—^Meeting J. Edgar Hoover in 1966—^The impact ofProposition 13 on the DA's Office—Changes in the DA's Office in the seventies and eighties—^Non-partisan role ofthe DA—^Meetingfuture wife Andrea Fisher—Events leading to Van de Kamp's decision to run for California state attorney general in 1982—^Democratic opponent Omer L. Rains. [Tape 6, Side B] 188 Raising funds and campaign strategies—Issues raised by Republican opponent GeorgeNicholson—Campaignplatform—Organizing the office and hiring stafffor the Attorney General's Office—Creation ofthe Cal-ID system and its use in helping to apprehend Richard Ramirez—Other technological advances include the use ofDNA and the Cal-PHOTO system—Campaign Against Marijuana Planting program is created to deal with increased criminal activity during the eighties. [Tape 7, Side A] ..211 Expands the efforts ofthe Division of Law Enforcement—^Focuses efforts in the area ofconsumer fraud and environmental protection. SESSION 5, September 15, 2003 [Tape 8, Side A] 221 Reapportionment and the Sebastiani initiative in the early eighties—Working with the Governor's Office on the budget when there is a deficit—^Division ofCivil Law—^Unitary tax law—^Reorganizing the Division ofCriminal Law and creating a Correctional Law Section—Establishes a Major Fraud Unit as part ofan effort to provide more support to local law enforcement—More on organizing the Attorney General's Office—^More on the office's efforts
Recommended publications
  • Women and Equality
    WOMEN AND EQUALITY A California Review of Women’s Equity Issues in Civil Rights, Education and the Workplace California Senate Office of Research February 1999 Dedicated to Senator Rose Ann Vuich Rose Ann Vuich was elected California’s first woman state senator in 1976 and served four terms through 1992. Although a Democrat by registration, she built a reputation as a political independent who shunned deal-making. Throughout her legislative career, Senator Vuich represented her San Joaquin Valley district first and foremost and relied on her own knowledge and judgment to do it. She was reared on a farm in Tulare County, where she has spent most of her life. With a degree in accounting from the Central California Commercial College in Fresno, she worked as an accountant, tax consultant, estate planner and office manager before her election. After becoming a senator she continued, with her brother, to manage the family farm in Dinuba. The California State Senate began to change after Senator Vuich joined its ranks, followed over the years by other women. She kept a small porcelain bell on her Senate floor desk, and would gently but insistently shake it whenever a colleague addressed the “gentlemen of the Senate.” The Senate chamber originally had no women’s restroom. But that oversight permitted Senator Vuich, during a Capitol restoration in the late 1970s, to design a comfortable “Rose Room” where she and women members into the future could retreat from the Senate floor. A daughter of Yugoslav immigrants, Senator Vuich achieved many “firsts,” from serving as the first woman president of the Dinuba Chamber of Commerce to becoming the first woman to preside over a Senate floor session in 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Survey Has Carter Winning
    Daily survey has Carter winning people read the papers, including my teacher. Campaign '76 special "I am voting for the communists because they seem to have a very tod outlook on racism, sexism, wel- poll, platforms, re and war," she added. issues Kevin Sindelar, 23, admini- stration of justice major, said "I'm By John C. Hayes Republican Ford received 32.8 per not overjoyed with the election. I The results of a special Spartan cent. The remaining votes went to think it's the lesser of two evils Daily election poll are in and the other candidates and no candidates. voting for Carter rather than Ford. winner is former Georgia governor In the senatorial race, Demo- "If! had my 'druthers I'd vote for Jimmy Carter by 8 per cent. cratic Senator John Tunney came McCarthy. Neither candidate in- Neither he nor incumbent Presi- out a clear victor over Republican terests me. I'm voting because! feel dent Gerald Ford emerges with a challenger S.I. Hayakawa, 47.4 per obligated," he said. clear majority, however, and a big cent to 36.5 per cent. "I don't feel great about eitner shift in the 11.2 per cent undecided Two selected ballot measures, candidates," said Ursula Hermle, a vote could tip the balance in favor of Propositions 13 and 14, also were 23-year-old advertising student. Ford. tabulated. Proposition 13 would . "Carter promises to rehash the Nearly 800 students and faculty legalize para mutual betting on world over. He generally favors the were sampled in a non-random Greyhound racing and boat 72.7 per 4 middle class working person.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Conviction Dna Testing: When Is Justice Served?
    S. HRG. 106–1061 POST-CONVICTION DNA TESTING: WHEN IS JUSTICE SERVED? HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 13, 2000 Serial No. J–106–88 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 74–753 WASHINGTON : 2001 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:39 Oct 05, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DISC\74753.XXX ATX007 PsN: ATX007 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Chairman STROM THURMOND, South Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JON KYL, Arizona HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin MIKE DEWINE, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York BOB SMITH, New Hampshire MANUS COONEY, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Minority Chief Counsel (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:39 Oct 05, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DISC\74753.XXX ATX007 PsN: ATX007 C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Biden, Hon. Joseph R., Jr., a U.S. Senator from the State of Delaware ............. 68 DeWine, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management Strategies Used to Meet Plan Objectives
    SECTION 5.0 WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES USED TO MEET PLAN OBJECTIVES 5.1 Overview of This Section Included in the State’s IRWMP Guidelines (Appendix A, Plan Standards) are 20 water management strategies to be considered for implementation as part of an IRWM Plan. Of the 20 water management strategies, 11 of them are required to be addressed in a Plan (see below). Because all 20 water management strategies are currently being implemented within the Region and are consistent with the IRWM Plan objectives, the Watersheds Coalition of Ventura County (WCVC) determined that all of the strategies would be discussed in the Region’s IRWM Plan. Water Management Strategies Ecosystem restoration* Conjunctive use Environmental and habitat protection and Desalination improvement* Imported water Water supply reliability* Land use planning Flood management* NPS pollution control Groundwater management* Surface storage Recreation and public access* Watershed planning Stormwater capture and management* Water and wastewater treatment Water conservation* Water transfers Water quality protection and improvement* Water recycling* Wetlands enhancement and creation* Source: Table A, Appendix A, Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program Guidelines * Denotes water management strategies which are mandatory, as indicated in the Guidelines In one way or another all of the water management strategies are included as part of local Urban Water Management Plans, watershed management/protection plans, facility master plans, capital improvement plans, habitat conservation plans, flood and stormwater management plans, water conservation plans, water quality improvement plans, groundwater management plans and other plans addressing water supply, water resources and related issues. These plans have been developed and implemented for a variety of reasons: based on local needs and priorities, grant funding availability, regulatory requirements, and/or conditions placed on project approval.
    [Show full text]
  • CA Brief Cover
    S238309 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RON BRIGGS AND JOHN VAN DE KAMP, Petitioners, vs. JERRY BROWN, in his official capacity as the Governor of California; KAMALA HARRIS, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of California; CALIFORNIA’S JUDICIAL COUNCIL; and DOES I THROUGH XX, Respondents, CALIFORNIANS TO MEND, NOT END, THE DEATH PENALTY– NO ON PROP. 62, YES ON PROP. 66, Intervenor. PRELIMINARY OPPOSITION OF INTERVENOR CALIFORNIANS TO MEND, NOT END, THE DEATH PENALTY– NO ON PROP. 62, YES ON PROP. 66 TO THE PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF Charles H. Bell, Jr. SBN 60553 Kent S. Scheidegger SBN 105178 Email: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Terry J. Martin SBN 307802 Kymberlee C. Stapleton SBN 213463 Email: [email protected] Criminal Justice Legal Foundation Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk, LLP 2131 L Street 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 600 Sacramento, California 95816 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 446-0345 Telephone: (916) 442-7757 Fax: (916) 446-1194 Fax: (916) 442-7759 Attorneys for Intervenors CALIFORNIANS TO MEND, NOT END, THE DEATH PENALTY– NO ON PROP. 62, YES ON PROP. 66 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of authorities. 4 I. Introduction. 10 II. There is no basis for enjoining the implementation of Proposition 66 as a whole. 12 A. Severability. 12 B. Single Subject. 14 1. Work and Victim Restitution.. 18 2. Execution Protocols and the APA. 19 3. Protection of Assisting Medical Professionals. 21 4. HCRC Governance. 22 5. Conclusion.. 24 III. The habeas corpus reforms are well within the people’s reserved legislative power.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Y?Amji ~ MARIA SILVA Commission Executive Assistant I
    LO. ANGELES POLICE COMM~ JION BOARD OF RICHARD M. TEFANK POLICE COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NICOLE C. BERSHON JOHNW. MACK INSPECTOR GENERAL PRESIDENT ALAN J. SKOBIN EXECUTIVE OFFICE VICE PRES IDENT PoliCE ADMINISTRATION B UILDING ANTON IO R VI LLARA IGOSA 100WEST F IRST STREET, S UITE 134 RICHARD OROOYAN MAYOR L osANGELEs, CA90012-4 1 12 ROBERT M. SALTZMAN DEBRA WONG YANG (213) 236-1400 PHONE (213)236-1410FAX MARIA SILVA (213) 236-1440 TOO COMM ISSION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I September 27, 2010 BPC #10-0367 The Honorable Public Safety Committee City of Los Angeles c/o City Clerk's Office City Hall, Room 395 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention John White: RE: REPORT ON THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON THE FAIR ADMINISTRATION OF IDSTICE At the regular meeting ofthe Board ofPolice Commissioners held Tuesday, September 14, 2010, the Board APPROVED the Department's report relative to the above matter. This matter is being forwarded to you for approval. Respectfully, BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS 7Y?aMJi ~ MARIA SILVA Commission Executive Assistant I Attachment c: Chief of Police AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER www.LAPDOnline.org www.joinLAPD.com INTR )EPARTMENTAL CORRESPOND 'CE September 7, 20 I 0 (;['0 0 9 2010 1.14 '-' · --~ CF # 08-1943 POLICE CO!v1f\IIISSION CB # 10-0009 TO: The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: REPORT ON THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON THE FAIR ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. That the Board APPROVE this report on the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice, and TRANSMIT this report to the City Council' s Public Safety Committee in response to a motion introduced by Councilman Bernard Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced from the Microfilm Master. UMI Films the Text Directly from the Origina
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell Information Company 300North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor.Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 THE JUDICIARY AND THE DUAL EXECUTIVE IN THE AMERICAN STATES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By James Brent, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall / Winter 2017 Newsletter [PDF]
    California Supreme Court Historical Society newsletter · f a l l / winter 2017 Law Walk cover: LA downtown skyline or map, with cameos of walking tour locations A Legal Site-Seeing Tour of Downtown Los Angeles By Bob Wolfe* he etymology is disputed, but it can’t be Calif., 1965), and seminal historical events that spilled a coincidence that we refer to the floors of a over into courtroom battles — Teapot Dome, the execu- Tbuilding as stories. For that is what buildings tion of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, the Chinese Massa- are all about: a construction of stories — of the lives of cre of 1871, and the St. Francis Dam collapse, the greatest people who lived or worked or shopped or visited there. American civil engineering failure in American history. Downtown Los Angeles is as much a construction of And since Hollywood and the myths surrounding legal stories as any set of casebooks you will find in a moviemaking were birthed in downtown L.A., the cen- law library. Nearly every old building that still stands tral city also acquired a bit of tinsel, of glam and noir, in the historic district has myriad legal stories to tell — of dark secrets, crime and corruption. Downtown was about how we lived, the struggles we fought, the preju- home to scofflaws like district attorneys Asa Keyes and dices and biases we overcame, and those to which we Buron Fitts, and appellate Justice Gavin Craig, as well succumbed. as transcendent legal heroes like Clara Shortridge Foltz, A sort of greatest hits of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • John Van De Kamp House Qualifies As a Landmark, and Ask You to Consider This Hillside Development Permit in Light of Its Eligibility As an Historic Resource
    Eric Whalen March 15, 2021, Sent to emails [email protected], [email protected] Members of the Board of Zoning Appeals City of Pasadena 100 North Garfield Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 Re: HDP #6837 for 801 S. San Rafael Ave. BZA Agenda March 18, 2021 Dear Members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, I live at just about 1 mi. away from 801 S. San Rafael Ave. While familiarizing myself with Pasadena’s zoning laws and permit policies (for another, unrelated project), my friend who owns the property at 815 S. San Rafael brought my attention to the matter of HDP #6837. As an informed and concerned citizen who has been following this matter for some time now, there are some irregular things about this project that trouble and/or confuse me. In my understanding, the fundamental purpose of a Hillside Development Permit is to ensure that a proposed project has minimal impact to both the visual and environmental character of the neighborhood. The substantial amount of construction that has already occurred prior to this public hearing shows the value of having HDPs – in that the structures relevant to this permit visually break from what I have seen elsewhere in the neighborhood, and it would have been nice if there was a system of community checks and balances to review the project prior to the beginning of their construction. Supporting this visual inspection with a data-driven perspective, it strikes me as unusual that this project has quite the number of substantive, potentially habitable buildings that are being constructed on this property within a short period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Archives History Program
    - IHI if CALIFORNIA STATE ARCHIVES HISTORY PROGRAM INTERVIEW WITH BRUCE SAMUEL OFFICE OF MARCH FONG EU SECRETARY OF STATE University of California Berkeley CALIFORNIA SlT[ AlCII V IS California State Archives State Government Oral History Program Oral History Interview with BRUCE SAMUEL State Government Employee, 1960-1984 May 9, June 11, 1991 and April 2, 1992 Sacramento, California By Germaine LaBerge Regional Oral History Office University of California, Berkeley RESTRICTIONS ON THIS INTERVIEW None. LITERARY RIGHTS AND QUOTATIONS This manuscript is hereby made available for research purposes only. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the California State Archivist or Regional Oral History Office, University of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to: California State Archives 1020 O Street, Room 130 Sacramento, California 95814 or Regional Oral History Office 486 Library University of California Berkeley, California 94720 The request should include information of the specific passages and identification of the user. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: Bruce Samuel, Oral History Interview, Conducted 1991 and 1992 by Germaine LaBerge, Regional Oral History Office, University of California at Berkeley, for the California State Archives State Government Oral History Program. Information (916) 445-1293 California State Archives March Fong Eu Research Room (916) 445-4?.93 1020 O Street, Room 130 Exhibit Hall (916) 445-4293 of State Secretary Legislative Bill Service (916) 445-2S32 Sacramento, CA 95814 (prior years) PREFACE On September 25, 1985, Governor George Deukmejian signed into law A.B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Executives' Discretion to Defend Initiatives Amending the California
    Whose Constitution Is It Anyway? The Executives’ Discretion to Defend Initiatives Amending the California Constitution by JEREMY ZEITLIN* Introduction On September 8, 2010, the California Supreme Court declared that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown need not defend their state’s freshly amended constitution.1 The court’s decision was brief.2 This ruling, however, may end the decade long political and legal struggle over same-sex marriage in 3 California. * Juris Doctor Candidate 2012, University of California, Hastings College of the Law; B.A. 2007 Brown University, American History and Religious Studies. The author would like to thank Professor Elizabeth Hillman, Julia Heming, and the editors of the Constitutional Law Quarterly for their guidance. He would also like to thank his family for being exactly who they are. 1. Beckley v. Schwarzenegger, Case No. S186072, Sept. 8, 2011, appeal dismissed, http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/disposition.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=1954641 &doc_no=S186072 (California Supreme Court denying petition for review). See also Letter Brief of Respondent-Appellee Attorney General Jerry Brown at 1, Beckley v. Schwarzenegger, No. S186072 (Cal. Sept. 8, 2010) 2010 WL 3874716. 2. Letter Brief of Respondent-Appellee Attorney General Jerry Brown at 1, Beckley, No. S186072. Joshua Beckley, a proponent of Proposition 8 petitioned for a writ of mandamus to compel Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown to file a notice of appeal to the District Court’s decision striking down of Proposition 8. The decision was economical, only stating: “The petition for review denied.” Id. 3. In 2004, San Francisco began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
    [Show full text]
  • 1980 May Engineers News
    A COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE JUNE PRIMARY (pg. 10-12) Caltrans tries to cope with cut in federal funds A de-escalated highway con- State Transportation Director Last month the Federal Highway eral Highway Administration to al- situation in Washington and I have struction schedule and a lawsuit Adriana Gianturco announced this Administration informed Caltrans locate the reduced funds penalizes called on the Californ ia Congres- against the federal Department of month that Caltrans has gone to that the $330 million in federal those states like California which sional delegation to assist us in ob- Transportation were two actions court to seek its fair share of federal matching funds that had originally had planned to obligate the bulk of taining a revision of our alloca- taken by Caltrans this month in the highway funds for California. Cal- been obligated to California had their federally funded highway tion," Gianturco stated. wake of President Carter's freeze trans is seeking a court order in been reduced to $148 million, as projects in the latter half of the On April 14 Caltrans submitted on federal funds and highway bud- U.S. District Court in Sacramento part of a nationwide cutback in fiscal year, according to Gianturco. to the Federal Highway Adminis- get cuts. However, there are some that would require the U, S. De- highway expenditures, Caltrans Caltrans supports a more equitable tration an expenditure plan based indications coming outofWashing- partment of Transportation to use contends that the method selected formula based on sharing the re- on the reduced federal highway ton that President Carter will cut the apportionment formula man- for allocating the reduced funds duction among all states in propor- money.
    [Show full text]