10 Deer Resistant Plants to Know About
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Native Plant Catalog
native plant catalog HERBACEOUS PLANTS Page 1 Botanical Name Common Name Color Bloom Light Soil Height Agastache 'Black Adder' Hyssop Violet-Blue June-Sept Full Sun M-D 2-3' Fragrant flowers attract bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds; Compact and good for containers; Deer resistant. Allium cernuum Nodding Onion Lt Pink May-June Sun-Pt Shade D 12-18” Attracts bees and butterflies; perfect for rocky soils; tolerates drought once established. Amsonia 'Blue Ice' Blue Star Dark Blue Apr-May Sun-Pt Shade M 12-15" Attracts hummingbirds, bees, and butterflies; foliage turns golden yellow in fall, adding stunning color to the garden. Amsonia tab. var. salicifolia Eastern Bluestar Lt Blue Apr-May Sun-Pt Shade M 2-3’ Attracts bees and butterflies; tolerates clay soil and drought; attractive yellow fall color. Stake in moist soils. Aquilegia canadensis Wild Columbine Red and Yellow Apr-May Part Shade M-D 1-3' Attracts hummingbirds and butterflies; self sows in woodland garden. Tolerates dry soil and deer. Arisaema triphyllum Jack-in-the-Pulpit Green/Maroon Apr-June Shade M 1-2' Bright red berry cluster in fall provides food for birds, mammals, and turtles. A true specimen plant for the woodland garden. Asarum canadense Wild Ginger Maroon May-June Shade M 6" Alternate larval host plant for pipevine swallowtail butterfly; a wonderful slow-spreading groundcover for deep shade. Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed Rose-Pink July-Sept Full Sun M-W 3-5’ Larval host for monarch butterfly; attracts bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds; a good choice for rain gardens; tolerates clay soils. Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed Pale Pink July-Sept Full Sun M-D 2-4' Larval host for monarch butterfly; attracts bees, butterflies and hummingbirds; tolerates clay soils. -
Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Dipsacales, with Special Reference to Sinadoxa and Tetradoxa (Adoxaceae)
PHYLOGENY AND PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY OF DIPSACALES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SINADOXA AND TETRADOXA (ADOXACEAE) MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE,1 TORSTEN ERIKSSON,2 PATRICK A. REEVES,3 AND RICHARD G. OLMSTEAD 3 Abstract. To further clarify phylogenetic relationships within Dipsacales,we analyzed new and previously pub- lished rbcL sequences, alone and in combination with morphological data. We also examined relationships within Adoxaceae using rbcL and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. We conclude from these analyses that Dipsacales comprise two major lineages:Adoxaceae and Caprifoliaceae (sensu Judd et al.,1994), which both contain elements of traditional Caprifoliaceae.Within Adoxaceae, the following relation- ships are strongly supported: (Viburnum (Sambucus (Sinadoxa (Tetradoxa, Adoxa)))). Combined analyses of C ap ri foliaceae yield the fo l l ow i n g : ( C ap ri folieae (Diervilleae (Linnaeeae (Morinaceae (Dipsacaceae (Triplostegia,Valerianaceae)))))). On the basis of these results we provide phylogenetic definitions for the names of several major clades. Within Adoxaceae, Adoxina refers to the clade including Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa, and Adoxa.This lineage is marked by herbaceous habit, reduction in the number of perianth parts,nectaries of mul- ticellular hairs on the perianth,and bifid stamens. The clade including Morinaceae,Valerianaceae, Triplostegia, and Dipsacaceae is here named Valerina. Probable synapomorphies include herbaceousness,presence of an epi- calyx (lost or modified in Valerianaceae), reduced endosperm,and distinctive chemistry, including production of monoterpenoids. The clade containing Valerina plus Linnaeeae we name Linnina. This lineage is distinguished by reduction to four (or fewer) stamens, by abortion of two of the three carpels,and possibly by supernumerary inflorescences bracts. Keywords: Adoxaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales, ITS, morphological characters, phylogeny, phylogenetic taxonomy, phylogenetic nomenclature, rbcL, Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa. -
Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea Virginica ‘Morton’
CHICAGOLAND GROWS®, INC. Plant Introduction Program - Plant Release Bulletin #28 Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea virginica ‘Morton’ The Morton Virginia sweetspire is a summer-flowering shrub with excellent fall color. This selection has superior hardiness and a higher soil pH tolerance than other cultivars of the species. An easy-to-grow native shrub selected from the collections at The Morton Arboretum. Chicagoland Grows® is a nonprofit corporation of the Chicago Botanic Garden, The Morton Arboretum, and the Ornamental Growers Association of Northern Illinois (OGA). Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea virginica ‘Morton’ Botanical Name Ornamental Characteristics Itea virginica ‘Morton’ The white flowers are densely borne on numerous pendant 3-inch-long inflorescences that are produced from mid-June Common Name to early July, when few other shrubs are in bloom. The flowers Morton Virginia Sweetspire have a faint but pleasing fragrance and are attractive to butterflies. Medium-green foliage all summer changes to deep Family orange-red to red-purple in autumn, peaking in early November Iteaceae and persisting through a very hard frost. In milder climates, the colorful foliage can persist much of the winter. The stems can Origin also turn a pleasing red color during winter months. Selected in 1999 by Kris Bachtell of The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, from a plant that has been in the Arboretum’s Culture collection since the late 1950s. The species is native throughout Best grown on moist to wet soils with ample organic matter. the southeastern United States, from coastal Florida north to As with most selections of Virginia sweetspire, ‘Morton’ prefers New Jersey and from eastern Texas north into southern Illinois. -
Vascular Plants for High Park and the Surrounding Humber Plains, 2008
Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants for High Park and the Surrounding Humber Plains September 2008 Steve Varga Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Aurora District Acknowledgements The Ministry has undertaken biological inventories of High Park and its environs over the past 32 years. The first botanical survey was carried out by Karen L. McIntosh as part of an ecological survey of High Park that focussed on Grenadier Pond and the surrounding uplands (Wainio et al. 1976). Botanical surveys were also carried out by the author in 1980, 1982 and 1988. In 1989, this survey information was put together into an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) inventory report of the Park that recognized the natural areas of High Park as a provincial life science ANSI. Subsequent botanical surveys were carried out by the author between 1997 and 2008. Botanical records from High Park have also been kindly provided by Dr. Paul. M. Catling, Dr. Paul F. Maycock, Roger Powley, Charles Kinsley, Gavin Miller, Bohdan Kowalyk, Diana Banville and other members of the Toronto Field Naturalists (TFN), City of Toronto Parks, Forestry & Recreation Division including present and former staff such as Terry Fahey, Cara Webster and Richard Ubens among others, the High Park Community Advisory Committee and it Natural Environment Committee chaired by Karen Yukich, and James Kamstra who in 2007 and 2008 is mapping the location and numbers of rare plants in the Park. The Vascular Plant Herbarium (TRT) at the Royal Ontario Museum and the University of Toronto, Erindale College Herbarium (TRTE) were also examined for historical and recent records from the Park and its surrounding areas. -
Non-Native Invasive Plants of the City of Alexandria, Virginia
March 1, 2019 Non-Native Invasive Plants of the City of Alexandria, Virginia Non-native invasive plants have increasingly become a major threat to natural areas, parks, forests, and wetlands by displacing native species and wildlife and significantly degrading habitats. Today, they are considered the greatest threat to natural areas and global biodiversity, second only to habitat loss resulting from development and urbanization (Vitousek et al. 1996, Pimentel et al. 2005). The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation has identified 90 non-native invasive plants that threaten natural areas and lands in Virginia (Heffernan et al. 2014) and Swearingen et al. (2010) include 80 plants from a list of nearly 280 non-native invasive plant species documented within the mid- Atlantic region. Largely overlapping with these and other regional lists are 116 species that were documented in the City of Alexandria, Virginia during vegetation surveys and natural resource assessments by the City of Alexandria Dept. of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities (RPCA), Natural Lands Management Section. This list is not regulatory but serves as an educational reference informing those with concerns about non-native invasive plants in the City of Alexandria and vicinity, including taking action to prevent the further spread of these species by not planting them. Exotic species are those that are not native to a particular place or habitat as a result of human intervention. A non-native invasive plant is here defined as one that exhibits some degree of invasiveness, whether dominant and widespread in a particular habitat or landscape or much less common but long-lived and extremely persistent in places where it occurs. -
Viburnum Plicatum Var. Tomentosum - Doublefile Viburnum (Adoxaceae) ------Viburnum Plicatum Var
Viburnum plicatum var. tomentosum - Doublefile Viburnum (Adoxaceae) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Viburnum plicatum var. tomentosum is a shrub known for its elegant beauty in form, flowering, Trunk occasional fruiting, and autumn color. Doublefile -older branches develop fissuring bark as they mature Viburnum vary in the display of these traits. into several main trunks; this is more pronounced on the larger "species" form, namely, Viburnum FEATURES plicatum Form -medium-sized USAGE ornamental shrub Function -maturing at about 8' -single, dual, or group planting shrub for tall x 10' wide entranceways, foundations, raised planters, -layered vased naturalized shrub borders, or as a specimen growth habit in Texture youth, becoming -medium texture in foliage and when bare more layered -thick density in foliage and when bare horizontal with age Assets -medium growth rate -extremely showy white inflorescences in mid-spring, Culture arranged in doublefile fashion alongside the main -full sun to partial shade stems and above the stem planes -performs best in partial sun in evenly moist, well- -excellent vased to horizontal branching habit drained, slightly acidic soils; quite adaptable to soils -good burgundy autumn color of various pH, but not especially adaptable to poor Liabilities soils, compacted soils, heavy clay soils with poor -basal trunk canker can arise on individual branches drainage, heat, drought, and pollution with advanced age, causing them to die -
Plant Invasions in Rhode Island Riparian Zones ✴Paleostratigraphy in B Y S U Z a N N E M
Volume 12 • Number 2 • November 2005 What’s Inside… Plant Invasions in Rhode Island Riparian Zones ✴Paleostratigraphy in B Y S U Z A N N E M . L U S S I E R A N D S A R A N . D A S I L V A the Campus Freezer ✴Wandering Hooded Riparian zones opportunistic, they are often the first Methods Seals are the corridors plants to colonize disturbed patches of Selecting the Study Sites ✴Bringing Watershed of land adjacent soil and forest edges. Several research- Health and Land to streams, riv- ers have found that riparian zones sup- By using hydrographical and land Use History into the use/land cover data from the Rhode Classroom ers, and other port a greater abundance and diversity Island Geographic Information System ✴ surface waters, of invasive plants than other habitats The Paleozoology (RIGIS, http://www.edc.uri.edu/rigis/), Collection of the which serve as (Brown and Peet 2003, Burke and Museum of Natural transitional areas Grime 1996, Gregory et al. 1991). we characterized eight subwatersheds History, Roger Wil- between terres- by their percentage of residential land liams Park trial and aquatic Streams within urban and suburban use (4–59%). Stream corridors were de- ✴“The Invasives Beat” systems. Their watersheds characteristically carry lineated using orthophotos and verified ✴Bioblitz 2005 vegetation pro- higher nutrient loads following storm with on-site latitude/longitude readings ✴and lots more... vides valuable events as the first flush of overland run- from a Geographic Positioning System wildlife habitat off transports nonpoint-source (nutri- (GPS). We also calculated the edge- while enhancing ent) pollution into the stream corridors to-area ratio for each riparian zone to instream habitat (Burke and Grime 1996). -
Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 ON THE COVER Duck potato (Sagittaria latifolia) at Ocmulgee National Monument. Photograph by: Sarah C. Heath, SECN Botanist. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 Sarah Corbett Heath1 Michael W. Byrne2 1USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia 31558 2USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Road Athens, Georgia 30605 September 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. -
Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices 1 TABLE of CONTENTS
Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices School of Integrative Plant Science, Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions Horticulture Section Second Edition Ethan M. Dropkin, Nina Bassuk and Trevan Signorelli Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS What is Stormwater? ................................................................................... 3 Stormwater Issues ....................................................................................... 4 Combined Sewer Overflow......................................................................... 5 Municipal, State and Federal Stormwater Regulations ............................ 6 Stormwater Infiltration Practices ............................................................... 6 Why Use Plants? .......................................................................................... 7 What Plants are Best? ................................................................................. 8 Site Assessment .......................................................................................... 9 Site Assessment Checklist ......................................................................... 12 Design Consideration Prior to Plant Selection ......................................... 13 Establishment .............................................................................................. 14 Maintenance ................................................................................................. 15 Plant Selection ............................................................................................ -
Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project. -
Chapter Four: Landscaping with Native Plants a Gardener’S Guide for Missouri Landscaping with Native Plants a Gardener’S Guide for Missouri
Chapter Four: Landscaping with Native Plants A Gardener’s Guide for Missouri Landscaping with Native Plants A Gardener’s Guide for Missouri Introduction Gardening with native plants is becoming the norm rather than the exception in Missouri. The benefits of native landscaping are fueling a gardening movement that says “no” to pesticides and fertilizers and “yes” to biodiversity and creating more sustainable landscapes. Novice and professional gardeners are turning to native landscaping to reduce mainte- nance and promote plant and wildlife conservation. This manual will show you how to use native plants to cre- ate and maintain diverse and beauti- ful spaces. It describes new ways to garden lightly on the earth. Chapter Four: Landscaping with Native Plants provides tools garden- ers need to create and maintain suc- cessful native plant gardens. The information included here provides practical tips and details to ensure successful low-maintenance land- scapes. The previous three chap- ters include Reconstructing Tallgrass Prairies, Rain Gardening, and Native landscapes in the Whitmire Wildflower Garden, Shaw Nature Reserve. Control and Identification of Invasive Species. use of native plants in residential gar- den design, farming, parks, roadsides, and prairie restoration. Miller called his History of Native work “The Prairie Spirit in Landscape Landscaping Design”. One of the earliest practitioners of An early proponent of native landscap- Miller’s ideas was Ossian C. Simonds, ing was Wilhelm Miller who was a landscape architect who worked in appointed head of the University of the Chicago region. In a lecture pre- Illinois extension program in 1912. He sented in 1922, Simonds said, “Nature published a number of papers on the Introduction 3 teaches what to plant. -
Virginia Willow (Itea Virginica)
Virginia willow (Itea virginica) For definitions of botanical terms, visit en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_botanical_terms. Virginia willow is an erect to spreading shrub with showy spikes of tiny white flowers that bloom in late winter through early summer. It occurs naturally in floodplain swamps, seepage slopes, stream and lake edges, and calcareous and mesic hammocks. The plant provides food and cover for wildlife. The inflorescence is a dense terminal spike-like raceme that droops downward. Individual flowers are star- shaped, with five white to pinkish petals and a five-lobed, cup-shaped calyx. Stamens are creamy white with pale pinkish anthers. Ovary and pistil are Photo by Keith Bradley prominent. The dark green, leathery leaves are elliptic to obovate with finely toothed margins and pointed tips. They are petiolate and alternately arranged. In the fall, leaf color changes to orange, red, burgundy or purple. Branches are slender and arching. Seeds are born in inconspicuous brown capsules. Despite its common name, Virginia willow is not a true willow, which are members of the Salix genus in the Salicaceae family. It is also known as Sweetspire and Tassel-white. Family: Iteaceae (Sweetspire family) Native range: Nearly throughout, less in southernmost counties To see where natural populations of Virginia willow have been vouchered, visit www.florida.plantatlas.usf.edu. Hardiness: Zones 8–10 Lifespan: Perennial Soil: Moist to wet, poor to well-drained, acidic sandy, loamy or clay soils Exposure: Mostly shade, but can sometimes tolerate full sun Growth habit: 6–10’ tall with spread of up to 6’ Propagation: Cuttings, seed Garden tips: Virginia willow is best suited for naturalistic or restoration landscapes and in plantings along retention pond edges, streams and other riparian zones where its suckering habit may assist with soil stabilization.