DOCSLIB.ORG

Numerical Model for the Orbit of the Earth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Numerical Model for the Orbit of the Earth Universal Journal of Geoscience 5(2): 33-39, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujg.2017.050203 Numerical Model for the Orbit of the Earth S. Karna1,*, A. K. Mallik2 1Physics Department, Tri-Chandra M. Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal 2Physics Department, Tribhuvan M. Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal Copyright©2017 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract In this paper, we constructed a 3-D numerical the main reference for specifying the position of the other model of the Earth-Sun geometry. Our model defines Earth’s celestial objects in our solar system. The perihelion and orbit as an inclined plane of spherically symmetric system. aphelion distances are said to be lie on the same ecliptic We calculated the degree of the tilt of the Earth orbit to the plane, though the shape of the Earth’s orbit is not circular. ecliptic plane by converting from ecliptic frame of reference Since the circular shape appears elliptical when viewed at an to the orbital frame of reference and then we made all the angle, means that for elliptical shape of orbit of Earth around measurement. Initial inputs of our model are aphelion and the Sun, the plane in which Earth orbits must be inclined to perihelion parameters. It is interesting to examine that our some angle with the ecliptic plane. In another word, the plane results obtained from Earth inclined orbit are same that of the Earth’s orbit must be in orbital plane, other than the observed value from Earth’s circular orbit. In other words, ecliptic plane. values of the axial tilt of Earth and Sun, the time taken for the The article is organized as follow: In Section 3, we Sun to move from vernal equinox to autumnal equinox and describe our 3-D numerical model of the Earth-Sun then back to the vernal equinox does not change. Moreover, geometry. In Section 4, we present the results: values of the we were also able to derive mathematical relations for axial tilt of Earth and Sun, the time taken for the Sun to move finding the length of the apparent solar days throughout the from vernal equinox to autumnal equinox and then back to year. On introducing the new types of the length of the day, the vernal equinox. In Section 5, we discuss what we are called Saurya day, the rate of precession of equinox is able to draw from our 3-D numerical model and compare calculated. our results with existing theory. In Section 6, we summarize our results and present our conclusions. Keywords Orbit of the Earth, Earth-Sun Geometry, Equinox, Perihelion, Aphelion, Rate of Precession 2 . Numerical Model The angle of cosine of ratios of mean distance to aphelion 1 . Introduction distance (θ1) and perihelion distance to mean distance (θ2) are as follows: The Solar system consists of the Sun, planets, satellites of -1 o the planets, numerous comets, asteroids, meteoroids and the Cos (1/1.016710) = Cos 10.402169 = Cosθ1⇒ θ1 = o interplanetary medium. Planets and most of their (planet’s) 10.402169 satellites revolve in a nearly circular orbit around the Sun and -1 o and Cos (0.983290/1) = Cos 10.488961 = Cosθ2⇒ θ2 = at the same time, they rotate about their own axis. Earth 10.488961o revolves around the sun in an anti-clockwise direction and or, Mean value, θ= 10.445565o always points into space in the same direction. During the We took the average value of θ1and θ2 for our further revolution period of the Earth around the Sun, the distance calculation. between the Earth and the Sun is not always the same, i.e., the orbit of Earth deviates a bit from the circle. The aphelion 2.1. To Find the Inclination of the Earth’s Orbit (farthest) distance of the Earth is 1.016710 AU, and the perihelion (closest) distance is 0.983290 AU, where 1AU = For Earth-Sun Geometry only, 149,597,870.7 km. The mean distance between the Earth and Consider a fictitious Celestial sphere of radius Rc (= Sun is 1AU [1]. 149,597,870.7 km / Sin10.445565o) = 825,134,101.1 km In our solar system, plane of the Earth's orbit is known as centered on the Sun, with its equator running along the plane the ecliptic plane. The ecliptic coordinate system is used as of the ecliptic as shown in fig. 2. Normal to the ecliptic plane 34 Numerical Model for the Orbit of the Earth defines the ecliptic pole of the Solar System. This Celestial orbital plane is not circular, but deviates a bit from the circle. sphere is rotating uniformly about pole to the ecliptic, so the Thus the projection of this point CE" (lying on the Celestial reference frame fixed on it is an ecliptic frame of reference sphere) in orbital plane as CE, (center of Earth, zso = 0) ES. defines the actual orbit of the Earth around the Sun. The Let us consider another frame of reference OS, called the orbital plane is inclined at an angle λ with the ecliptic plane orbital frame of reference with its origin coincides with ES and the value of λ represents the tilt of the Earth's orbit to the but its coordinate axes inclined at an angle of λ as shown in ecliptic. fig. 1. (This figure is adapted from Mathur (1996) [2]). 2.2. Calculating λ (Tilt of the Earth's Orbit to the Ecliptic Plane) Let the Cartesian Coordinates of the point CE" are xse, yse, zse in frame ES and xso, yso, zso in frame OS. Then the transformation equations from ES to OS is xso = xsecosλ + zsesinλ (1) yso = yse (2) zso = - xsesinλ + zsecosλ (3) Let the spherical polar coordinates of the point CE" are specified by (Rc, θse, Φse) with respect to the axes xse, yse, zse in frame ES and CE"(Rc, θso, Φso) with respect to xso, yso, zso in frame OS. Here, θse and θso is the co-latitude i.e. the angle between CE"S' and zse- axis in frame ES and CE"S' and zso-axis in frame OS respectively. Φse and Φso is the longitudinal or azimuthal angle. Figure 1. Representation of the point CE" in ecliptic and orbital frame of reference The longitudinal or azimuthal angle (Φse) is measured by starting the revolution of the Earth from the point, where the o Let any point CE" lies at the co-latitude of 10.445565 on Earth is at a farthest distance to the Sun. the surface of the Celestial sphere, and from CE", CE"CE' Substituting the value of xse for aphelion distance and perpendicular to xseyse- plane is drawn, then the radial perihelion distance in the transformation equation and distance from the center of the celestial sphere (S') in its solving it, we get, λ = 0.176506 degree. celestial equatorial plane (S'CE') is Here, the value of λ represents the degree of tilt of the Earth's orbit to the ecliptic plane. Thus the deviation in the R o = R Sin θ = 149,597,870.7 km. 10.445565 c path of the Earth from the circle indicates that the Earth's This Celestial Sphere rotates uniformly, then the point CE' orbital plane is inclined at an angle of 0.176506 degree with rotates on the equatorial plane (or the ecliptic plane also) of the ecliptic plane. the celestial sphere (zse = 0) uniformly at the distance of 149,597,870.7 km. from the center. Here C'E is taken as the 2.3. Distance between Earth and Sun in Orbital Plane imaginary center of the Earth of radius 6371 km., with its equator running along the equator of the Celestial Sphere, For the given value of Rc = 825,134,101.1 km., θse o and the path followed by C'E in equatorial plane is the =10.445565 , zse = Rccosθse = 811,459,649 km., λ = o imaginary orbit of the Earth around the Sun. 0.176506 the value of xse, yse, zse, xso, zso, and Rso (the Again, from CE", CE"CE perpendicular to xsoyso- plane is distance between Earth and Sun in orbital plane) can be drawn. Then, the radial distance from the center of the calculated as follows in Table: 1; Celestial sphere in orbital plane is S'CE. The path of CE in Universal Journal of Geoscience 5(2): 33-39, 2017 35 Table1. Distance between Earth and Sun in orbital plane at different azimuthal angle (Φse). 2 2 1/2 Φse xse = R sinθsecosΦse yse = R sinθsesinΦse = yso xso = xsecosλ+ zsesinλ zso = - xsesinλ + zsecosλ Rso = (xso + yso ) 0o 149,597,870.7 0 152,096,948.3 810,994,946.5 152,096,948.3 30o 129,555,556.4 74,798,935.35 132,054,729.1 811,056,688.9 151,767,362.1 60o 74,798,935.35 129,555,556.4 77,298,367.9 811,225,372.5 150,863,116.3 90o 0 149,597,870.7 2,499,787.4 811,455,798.6 149,618,755.0 120o -74,798,935.35 129,555,556.4 -72,298,793.0 811,686,224.6 148,363,599.5 150o -129,555,556.4 74,798,935.35 -127,055,154.2 811,854,908.2 147,437,759.5 180o -149,597,870.7 0 -147,097,373.4 811,916,650.7 147,097,373.4 210o -129,555,556.4 -74,798,935.35 -127,055,154.2 811,854,908.2 147,437,759.5 240o -74,798,935.35 -129,555,556.4 -72,298,793.0 811,686,224.6 148,363,599.5 270o 0 -149,597,870.7 2,499,787.4 811,455,798.6 149,618,755.0 300o 74,798,935.35 -129,555,556.4 77,298,367.9 811,225,372.5 150,863,116.3 330o 129,555,556.4 -74,798,935.35 132,054,729.1 811,056,688.9 151,767,362.1 360o 149,597,870.7 0 152,096,948.3 810,994,946.5 152,096,948.3 o The distance between the Earth and the Sun (Rso) at any yso at Φse= 90.957464 and at this point xso = 0 ).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Perturbations and Station-Keeping Requirements in Highly-Inclined Geosynchronous Orbits
    ANALYSIS OF PERTURBATIONS AND STATION-KEEPING REQUIREMENTS IN HIGHLY-INCLINED GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBITS Elena Fantino(1), Roberto Flores(2), Alessio Di Salvo(3), and Marilena Di Carlo(4) (1)Space Studies Institute of Catalonia (IEEC), Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), E.T.S.E.I.A.T., Colom 11, 08222 Terrassa (Spain), [email protected] (2)International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), Building C1, Campus Norte, UPC, Gran Capitan,´ s/n, 08034 Barcelona (Spain) (3)NEXT Ingegneria dei Sistemi S.p.A., Space Innovation System Unit, Via A. Noale 345/b, 00155 Roma (Italy), [email protected] (4)Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ (United Kingdom), [email protected] Abstract: There is a demand for communications services at high latitudes that is not well served by conventional geostationary satellites. Alternatives using low-altitude orbits require too large constellations. Other options are the Molniya and Tundra families (critically-inclined, eccentric orbits with the apogee at high latitudes). In this work we have considered derivatives of the Tundra type with different inclinations and eccentricities. By means of a high-precision model of the terrestrial gravity field and the most relevant environmental perturbations, we have studied the evolution of these orbits during a period of two years. The effects of the different perturbations on the constellation ground track (which is more important for coverage than the orbital elements themselves) have been identified. We show that, in order to maintain the ground track unchanged, the most important parameters are the orbital period and the argument of the perigee.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • Current State of Knowledge of the Magnetospheres of Uranus and Neptune
    Current State of Knowledge of the Magnetospheres of Uranus and Neptune 28 July 2014 Abigail Rymer [email protected] What does a ‘normal’ magnetosphere look like? . N-S dipole field perpendicular to SW . Solar wind driven circulation system . Well defined central tail plasmasheet . Loaded flux tubes lost via substorm activity . Trapped radiation on closed (dipolar) field lines close to the planet. …but then what is normal…. Mercury Not entirely at the mercy of the solar wind after all . Jupiter . More like its own little solar system . Sub-storm activity maybe totally internally driven …but then what is normal…. Saturn Krimigis et al., 2007 What is an ice giant (as distinct from a gas giant) planet? Consequenses for the magnetic field Soderlund et al., 2012 Consequenses for the magnetic field Herbert et al., 2009 Are Neptune and Uranus the same? URANUS NEPTUNE Equatorial radius 25 559 km 24 622 km Mass 14.5 ME 17.14 ME Sidereal spin period 17h12m36s (retrograde) 16h6m36s Obliquity (axial tilt to ecliptic) -97.77º 28.32 Semi-major axis 19.2 AU 30.1 AU Orbital period 84.3 Earth years 164.8 Earth years Dipole moment 50 ME 25 ME Magnetic field Highly complex with a surface Highly complex with a surface field up to 110 000 nT field up to 60 000 nT Dipole tilt -59º -47 Natural satellites 27 (9 irregular) 14 (inc Triton at 14.4 RN) Spacecraft at Uranus and Neptune – Voyager 2 Voyager 2 observations - Uranus Stone et al., 1986 Voyager 2 observations - Uranus Voyager 2 made excellent plasma measurements with PLS, a Faraday cup type instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Illumination Conditions at 4 Vesta: Predictions Using the Digital Elevation Model Derived from Hst Images
    42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2011) 2506.pdf SOLAR ILLUMINATION CONDITIONS AT 4 VESTA: PREDICTIONS USING THE DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL DERIVED FROM HST IMAGES. T. J. Stubbs 1,2,3 and Y. Wang 1,2,3 , 1Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 3NASA Lunar Science Institute, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA. Corresponding email address: Timothy.J.Stubbs[at]NASA.gov . Introduction: As with other airless bodies in the plane), the longitude of the ascending node is 103.91° Solar System, the surface of 4 Vesta is directly exposed and the argument of perihelion is 149.83°. Based on to the full solar spectrum. The degree of solar illumina- current estimates, Vesta’s orbital plane is believed to tion plays a major role in processes at the surface, in- have a precession period of 81,730 years [6]. cluding heating (surface temperature), space weather- For the shape of Vesta we use the 5 × 5° DEM ing, surface charging, surface chemistry, and exo- based on HST images [5], which is publicly available spheric production via photon-stimulated desorption. from the Planetary Data System (PDS). To our knowl- The characterization of these processes is important for edge, this is the best DEM of Vesta currently available. interepreting various surface properties. It is likely that The orbital information for Vesta is obtained from the solar illumination also controls the transport and depo- Dawn SPICE kernel, which currently limits us to the sition of volatiles at Vesta, as has been proposed at the current epoch (1900 to present).
    [Show full text]
  • The Observer's Handbook for 1912
    T he O bservers H andbook FOR 1912 PUBLISHED BY THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA E d i t e d b y C. A, CHANT FOURTH YEAR OF PUBLICATION TORONTO 198 C o l l e g e St r e e t Pr in t e d fo r t h e So c ie t y 1912 T he Observers Handbook for 1912 PUBLISHED BY THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA TORONTO 198 C o l l e g e St r e e t Pr in t e d fo r t h e S o c ie t y 1912 PREFACE Some changes have been made in the Handbook this year which, it is believed, will commend themselves to observers. In previous issues the times of sunrise and sunset have been given for a small number of selected places in the standard time of each place. On account of the arbitrary correction which must be made to the mean time of any place in order to get its standard time, the tables given for a particualar place are of little use any­ where else, In order to remedy this the times of sunrise and sunset have been calculated for places on five different latitudes covering the populous part of Canada, (pages 10 to 21), while the way to use these tables at a large number of towns and cities is explained on pages 8 and 9. The other chief change is in the addition of fuller star maps near the end. These are on a large enough scale to locate a star or planet or comet when its right ascension and declination are given.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth-Centred Universe
    Earth-centred Universe The fixed stars appear on the celestial sphere Earth rotates in one sidereal day The solar day is longer by about 4 minutes → scattered sunlight obscures the stars by day The constellations are historical → learn to recognise: Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, Cassiopeia, Pegasus, Auriga, Gemini, Orion, Taurus Sun’s Motion in the Sky The Sun moves West to East against the background of Stars Stars Stars stars Us Us Us Sun Sun Sun z z z Start 1 sidereal day later 1 solar day later Compared to the stars, the Sun takes on average 3 min 56.5 sec extra to go round once The Sun does not travel quite at a constant speed, making the actual length of a solar day vary throughout the year Pleiades Stars near the Sun Sun Above the atmosphere: stars seen near the Sun by the SOHO probe Shield Sun in Taurus Image: Hyades http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.g ov//data/realtime/javagif/gifs/20 070525_0042_c3.gif Constellations Figures courtesy: K & K From The Beauty of the Heavens by C. F. Blunt (1842) The Celestial Sphere The celestial sphere rotates anti-clockwise looking north → Its fixed points are the north celestial pole and the south celestial pole All the stars on the celestial equator are above the Earth’s equator How high in the sky is the pole star? It is as high as your latitude on the Earth Motion of the Sky (animated ) Courtesy: K & K Pole Star above the Horizon To north celestial pole Zenith The latitude of Northern horizon Aberdeen is the angle at 57º the centre of the Earth A Earth shown in the diagram as 57° 57º Equator Centre The pole star is the same angle above the northern horizon as your latitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Trajectory Coordinate System Information We Have Calculated the New Horizons Trajectory and Full State Vector Information in 11 Different Coordinate Systems
    Trajectory Coordinate System Information We have calculated the New Horizons trajectory and full state vector information in 11 different coordinate systems. Below we describe the coordinate systems, and in the next section we describe the trajectory file format. Heliographic Inertial (HGI) This system is Sun centered with the X-axis along the intersection line of the ecliptic (zero longitude occurs at the +X-axis) and solar equatorial planes. The Z-axis is perpendicular to the solar equator, and the Y-axis completes the right-handed system. This coordinate system is also referred to as the Heliocentric Inertial (HCI) system. Heliocentric Aries Ecliptic Date (HAE-DATE) This coordinate system is heliocentric system with the Z-axis normal to the ecliptic plane and the X-axis pointes toward the first point of Aries on the Vernal Equinox, and the Y- axis completes the right-handed system. This coordinate system is also referred to as the Solar Ecliptic (SE) coordinate system. The word “Date” refers to the time at which one defines the Vernal Equinox. In this case the date observation is used. Heliocentric Aries Ecliptic J2000 (HAE-J2000) This coordinate system is heliocentric system with the Z-axis normal to the ecliptic plane and the X-axis pointes toward the first point of Aries on the Vernal Equinox, and the Y- axis completes the right-handed system. This coordinate system is also referred to as the Solar Ecliptic (SE) coordinate system. The label “J2000” refers to the time at which one defines the Vernal Equinox. In this case it is defined at the J2000 date, which is January 1, 2000 at noon.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellites in Inclined Orbits to Increase Observation Capability Feasibility Analysis
    International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 118 No. 17 2018, 273-287 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu Special Issue ijpam.eu Small Satellites in Inclined Orbits to Increase Observation Capability Feasibility Analysis DVA Raghava Murthy1, V Kesava Raju2, T.Ramanjappa3, Ritu Karidhal4, Vijayasree Mallikarjuna Kande5, G Ravi chandra Babu6 and A Arunachalam7 1 7 Earth Observations System, ISRO Headquarters, Bengaluru, Karnataka India [email protected] 2 4 5 6ISRO Satellite Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India 3SK University, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India January 6, 2018 Abstract Over the period of past four decades, Remote Sensing data products and services have been effectively utilized to showcase varieties of applications in many areas of re- sources inventory and monitoring. There are several satel- lite systems in operation today and they operate from Po- lar Orbit and Geosynchronous Orbit, collect the imagery and non-imagery data and provide them to user community for various applications in the areas of natural resources management, urban planning and infrastructure develop- ment, weather forecasting and disaster management sup- port. Quality of information derived from Remote Sensing imagery are strongly influenced by spatial, spectral, radio- metric & temporal resolutions as well as by angular & po- larimetric signatures. As per the conventional approach of 1 273 International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue having Remote Sensing satellites in near Polar Sun syn- chronous orbit, the temporal resolution, i.e. the frequency with which an area can be frequently observed, is basically defined by the swath of the sensor and distance between the paths.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Solar System
    This graphic of the solar system was made using real images of the planets and comet Hale-Bopp. It is not to scale! To show a scale model of the solar system with the Sun being 1cm would require about 64 meters of paper! Image credit: Maggie Mosetti, NASA This book was produced to commemorate the Year of the Solar System (2011-2013, a martian year), initiated by NASA. See http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/yss. Many images and captions have been adapted from NASA’s “From Earth to the Solar System” (FETTSS) image collection. See http://fettss.arc.nasa.gov/. Additional imagery and captions compiled by Deborah Scherrer, Stanford University, California, USA. Special thanks to the people of Suntrek (www.suntrek.org,) who helped with the final editing and allowed me to use Alphonse Sterling’s awesome photograph of a solar eclipse! Cover Images: Solar System: NASA/JPL; YSS logo: NASA; Sun: Venus Transit from NASA SDO/AIA © 2013-2020 Stanford University; permission given to use for educational and non-commericial purposes. Table of Contents Why Is the Sun Green and Mars Blue? ............................................................................... 4 Our Sun – Source of Life ..................................................................................................... 5 Solar Activity ................................................................................................................... 6 Space Weather ................................................................................................................. 9 Mercury
    [Show full text]
  • Open Rosen Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING END OF LIFE DISPOSAL OF SATELLITES IN HIGHLY ELLIPTICAL ORBITS MITCHELL ROSEN SPRING 2019 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Aerospace Engineering with honors in Aerospace Engineering Reviewed and approved* by the following: Dr. David Spencer Professor of Aerospace Engineering Thesis Supervisor Dr. Mark Maughmer Professor of Aerospace Engineering Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Highly elliptical orbits allow for coverage of large parts of the Earth through a single satellite, simplifying communications in the globe’s northern reaches. These orbits are able to avoid drastic changes to the argument of periapse by using a critical inclination (63.4°) that cancels out the first level of the geopotential forces. However, this allows the next level of geopotential forces to take over, quickly de-orbiting satellites. Thus, a balance between the rate of change of the argument of periapse and the lifetime of the orbit is necessitated. This thesis sets out to find that balance. It is determined that an orbit with an inclination of 62.5° strikes that balance best. While this orbit is optimal off of the critical inclination, it is still near enough that to allow for potential use of inclination changes as a deorbiting method. Satellites are deorbited when the propellant remaining is enough to perform such a maneuver, and nothing more; therefore, the less change in velocity necessary for to deorbit, the better. Following the determination of an ideal highly elliptical orbit, the different methods of inclination change is tested against the usual method for deorbiting a satellite, an apoapse burn to lower the periapse, to find the most propellant- efficient method.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Axis Tracking with the RC1500B the Apparent Motion Of
    Single Axis Tracking with the RC1500B The apparent motion of an inclined orbit satellite appears as a narrow figure 8 pattern aligned perpendicular to the geo-stationary satellite arc. As the inclination of the satellite increases both the height and the width of the figure 8 pattern increase. The single axis tracker can follow the long dimension of the figure 8 but cannot compensate for the width of the figure 8 pattern. A paper (available on our web site - http://www.researchconcepts.com/Files/track_wp.pdf) describes the height and width of the figure 8 pattern as a function of the inclination of the satellite’s orbit. Note that the inclination of the satellite increases with time. The maximum rate of increase is approximately 0.9 degrees per year. As the inclination increases, the width of the figure 8 pattern will also increase. This has two implications for system performance. One, the maximum signal loss due to antenna misalignment will increase with time, and two, the antenna must have range a of motion sufficient to accommodate the greatest satellite inclination that will be encountered. Many people feel that single axis tracking is viable for antenna’s up to 3.8 meters at C band and 2.4 meters at Ku band. Implicit in this is the fact that the inclination of most commercial satellites is not allowed to exceed 5 degrees. This assumption should be verified before a system is fielded. A single axis tracking system must be in precise mechanical alignment to minimize loss due to the mount’s inability to compensate for the width of the figure eight pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.- the Geographic Position of a Celestial Body
    Chapter 3 Copyright © 1997-2004 Henning Umland All Rights Reserved Geographic Position and Time Geographic terms In celestial navigation, the earth is regarded as a sphere. Although this is an approximation, the geometry of the sphere is applied successfully, and the errors caused by the flattening of the earth are usually negligible (chapter 9). A circle on the surface of the earth whose plane passes through the center of the earth is called a great circle . Thus, a great circle has the greatest possible diameter of all circles on the surface of the earth. Any circle on the surface of the earth whose plane does not pass through the earth's center is called a small circle . The equator is the only great circle whose plane is perpendicular to the polar axis , the axis of rotation. Further, the equator is the only parallel of latitude being a great circle. Any other parallel of latitude is a small circle whose plane is parallel to the plane of the equator. A meridian is a great circle going through the geographic poles , the points where the polar axis intersects the earth's surface. The upper branch of a meridian is the half from pole to pole passing through a given point, e. g., the observer's position. The lower branch is the opposite half. The Greenwich meridian , the meridian passing through the center of the transit instrument at the Royal Greenwich Observatory , was adopted as the prime meridian at the International Meridian Conference in 1884. Its upper branch is the reference for measuring longitudes (0°...+180° east and 0°...–180° west), its lower branch (180°) is the basis for the International Dateline (Fig.
    [Show full text]