DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix J, Part 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix J, Part 1 Department of Final Environmental Forest Service Pacific Northwest Impact Statement Region Deschutes National Forest APPENDIX J Response to Public Comment Land and Resource Management Plan Deschutes National Forest Appendix J Appendix J Public Participation in Forest Plan Development Public Participation Philosophy communication effort. Issues have occurred at least twice a year Since inception It is intended The Deschutes National Forest was one of a handful that once the Plan is finished a new communtcation of National Forests selected as lead Forests after vehicle will be put in place similar to the Report passage of the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) The Forest was just completing a Land When the Forest conducted major public review Use Plan (Plan) underthe old unit planning concept efforts for 1982-1983 and 1986 Draft Environmental Considerable public involvement work had already Impact Statements (DEIS), they planned for longer occurred. than minimum review periods. This was done because of public interest, document and issues With the lead Forest designation efforts geared complexity, season of the year and concern for up to meet the intent of NFMA regarding public adequate review participation, Forest leaders recognized it was important to keep the public informed and solicit Throughout the over 10 year process Forest public input. The Forest worked to culture an personnel met informally with individuals and atmosphere of open, candid, and continuous organizations. People have been invitedto continue communication The Forest kicked off the NFMA dialogue even though there were not any participa- effort with a newsletter entitled 'Forest Plan Report " tion activities planned. That newsletter has been a key part of the Appendix J - 1 Appendix J Public Participation in Forest Plan Development Public Participation Activities (from concern The new issue statement was, "Should start of planning through DEIS) the Forest continue to use land for recreation residences (summer homes)?' The questions under Looking at the lssue were similarly revised. Issue Identification (November 1978) The issue of summer home residences in general will be discussed later in this report Activities Several comments reflected a need to insure that In November, 1978, the Forest mailed a list of 28 highly productive commercial timber land is issues/concerns prepared by the Forest Interdisci- seriously considered for uses other than timber plinary Team (ID Team) to approximately 850 production. In issue seven, the question is now organizations and individuals. Copies were also asked, 'Should all highly productive commercial provided to state and federal agencies as well as timber land be allocated to timber production?n other Forest Service offices. A request for written response to these issues resulted in the return of Concern was also expressed that the needs of 59 response forms and letters. special interest recreational groups (is , horse groups, off road vehicle (ORV) clubs, snowmobile Additionally, workshops were held in seven groups) would be adequately addressed in the locations (La Pine, Crescent, Bend, Sisters, Plan In response, the question 'Is there a need Eugene, Portland, and Redmond) to determine to provide facilities for Forest recreation groups, the concerns and issues most important to the I e., horse groups, backpackers, trailers, ORV, attendees. One hundred and nine persons attend- etc.9. was added to issue number 9 Similar ed these workshops A summary of the public questions were added to issue numbers 14 and involvement is included with this report. 18. During January and Februaly of 1979, the public Issue number 23 concerning fire management input was analyzed and used by the ID Team to was reworded from simply asking the question, evaluate and revise the original list of 28 issues. 'How acceptable is the role of fire in management of the Forest?' to a much more specific statement Public comment concerning the initial list of issues asking how to integrate the role of fire management prepared by the Forest resulted in changes to 11 into the Forest Plan. The new statement reads, of the 28 issues A large percentage of the written "What are the fire management goals that are responses confirmed the importance of each of responsive to and supportive of the expected the issues considered, so none were deleted outcomes from land and resource management?' Although several changes were made in consider- Comments from the Pacific Northwest Regional ing different aspects of the listed issues, public Office of the Forest Service prompted this change comments did not seem to require any addltional issue statements. From 1979 until release of the first DEIS in 1982 numerous issues of 'Forest Plan Report" were Some of the major changes in the issues were as produced. These provided people with updated follows information on the planning process Issue 12, 'How long should the Forest continue to Publlc Involvement Summary (January 1979) allocate land for recreation residence (summer home) use?' drew perhaps the strongest criticism There were 7 public workshops held, with a total Public comments indicated the wording of the attendance (excluding Forest Service personnel) statement tended to preludice the consideration of 109 At these workshops, 17 issues llsts weie of the issue. The issue as written seemed to say produced by workshop groups, and 84 issue the Forest will eventually foreclose all recreational cards were collected from individual attendees residence use, the question being only when. The The 'Forest Plan Report' announcing the work- issue statement was reworded to reflect that shops, and requesting input on the issues, was Appendix J - 2 Appendix J Public Participation in Forest Plan Development mailed to approximately 850 individuals and From this input, a total of 560 individual comments organizations on the Forest mailing lists. The were identified and coded for analysis and Forest received 46 returned response forms, 8 evaluation. personal letters, and 5 letters from government agencies. The following charts show the geographical, and interest spread of the workshop attendees, and responses. Public Workshop Attendance Interest Category* I Location I Date 1 Gov. 1 Ind. 1 Rec. I Env. I Private I News I Total Crescent 1 211 2/78 1 5 6 Sisters 12/13/78 1 3 19 23 Bend 12/14/78 2 1 6 10 1 20 Eugene 12/18/78 1 I 8 0 16 I 35 I Redmond I12/20/78 I I I I I Totals 2 6 15 15 66 3 109 *Abbreviations Key: Gov. = Government representative ind. = Industry representative Rec. = Recreationist group representative Env. = Environmentalist group (other than USFS) Private = Private individual News = Press and broadcast media representatives In the public comment analysis, approximately Some examples of these approaches are as follows 560 separate comments were isolated pertinent to identification of issues and concerns. Approxi- "Investment in timber should be at better growing sites.' mately 120 of the 560 comments could be considered approaches (they seemed to express "Don't experiment with Mt Hemlock clearcuts " an opinion of how the Forest or resource should be managed rather than simply posing a question 'More developed recreational facilities should or concern). be developed.' Appendix J - 3 Appendix J Public Participation in Forest Plan Development 'Allocate new areas for all year recreation.' The meeting schedule was. 'Maintain summer home leases at reasonable January 5 Sisters lease charges.' January 6 Redmond January 10 LaPine 'Roadless areas should be preserved for January 12 Eugene wilderness values.' January 13 Bend January 18 Portland DElS Release (December 1982) January 24 Crescent January 27 Madras Actlvltles About 350 people attended Attendance varied The first DElS was released in late December considerably between communities, with Portland 1982. Information meetings were held during (Western Forestry Center) having the least, while January, 1983, on the DElS and Draft Forest Plan Bend had the most (over 70) People were pleased for the Deschutes National Forest. They were scheduled in Bend, Crescent, Eugene, LaPine, that we made the effort to come and provide Portland, Madras, Redmond and Sisters. Although them information no formal presentations were made, Forest Specialists were available to answer questions. In The comment period closed February 15, 1983 addition, displays described the Alternatives and Forest Supervisor Dave Mohla encouraged people the differences between them as well as the to provide written comments along with supporting planning process. No oral testimony was taken at reasons. The combination of the two could help the meetings. in understanding the public's point of view and concerns In the development of the Plan and DES, Forest personnel wanted public participation. Because Public Involvement Summary - DElS (1982/1983) the Forest had recently completed a Forest Plan (three and one-half years prior), we were very Comment Analysis Process and Results concerned that interested people might be burned out with planning and public participation We Once a comment was received a systematic also did not want debates between people. process was used in the analysis of responses received on the various issues, alternatives, Therefore, the public participation and review planning process, the Forest Plan, and DElS meetings for the Draft Forest Plan and DElS were documents The process included portions of two designed to. systems--aContentSummary Analysis" and "Code- involve.' The former captures a comment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View / Open City of Turner Parks Master Plan.Pdf
    City of Turner Parks Master Plan Submitted to: City of Turner P.O. Box 456 Turner, OR 97392 Prepared by: Community Planning Workshop Community Service Center 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1209 http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~cpw April 2005 Acknowledgements The development of the Turner Parks Master Plan would not have been possible without the assistance of the following individuals. City Staff: Jim Thompson, Mayor Paul Poczobut, City Administrator Terry Rust, Public Works Director Gary Will, Chief of Police Turner Parks Committee: Carly Spainhower, City Council Amanda Bresee, City Council Paul Greiner, City Council Pat Crook, resident Thad Overturf, resident Community Planning Workshop Team: Kristopher Ackerson, Project Manager Pauline Chu, Plan Researcher Tina Nunez, Plan Researcher Bethany Johnson, Planner Robert Parker, Program Director City of Turner Parks Master Plan Page 1 Page 2 April 2005 Turner Parks Master Plan Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................. 5 Park Inventory ............................................................................................. 5 Community Needs Assessment .................................................................. 6 Park System Goals...................................................................................... 6 Capital Improvement Program
    [Show full text]
  • Arts & Culture
    An Invitation to All Bowen Islanders Advancing ARTS & CULTURE on Bowen Island 2017 - 2027 Cultural Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................. 3 A. Introduction ......................................................... 13 B. Our Guiding Principles ....................................... 20 C. What is Bowen’s Culture? .................................. 21 D. Goals, Strategies and Actions............................ 27 E. Plan Evaluation & Review ................................... 58 F. BOWEN 2025: A Thriving Arts-and-Culture Driven Community ..................... 59 Appendix I Status Of 2004 Cultural Plan Recommendations Appendix II Successes And New Challenges Identified Appendix III BIAC Core Programs/Budget Appendix IV Arts & Cultural Survey Highlights Appendix V Groups Consulted in Developing This Plan Appendix VI Interview Questions Appendix VII 78 Communications & Publicity Appendix VIII List of Research Documents DRAFTAppendix IX List of Abbreviations Appendix X Links to 2004 Cultural Plan, Terms of Reference and Other Documents Appendix XI Master Plan Budget Page 2 Bowen Island Cultural Plan “Bowen is a place where people can become who they want to be.” – Andrea Verwey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Why does Bowen Island need a Cultural “Master” Plan? Culture and art happen, planned or not. The motivation for developing a vision and goals along with a strategy to achieve those goals flows from the growing recognition and acknowledgment that arts are integral to our human existence. Culture engages minds, enriches the education of children, and supports lifelong learning. Culture helps define the character or identity of a community in which people feel a sense of belonging. It engages citizens in activities that help build a sense of community, resilience, and civic engagement. Finally, as the community grows, culture celebrates diversity and helps newcomers feel welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    Novel strategies for engineering redox metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Víctor Gabriel Guadalupe Medina 2013 Novel strategies for engineering redox metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K.Ch.A.M. Luyben, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 14 oktober 2013 om 15:00 uur door Víctor Gabriel GUADALUPE MEDINA Magíster en Ciencias de la Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, geboren te Rancagua, Chili. Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. dr. J.T. Pronk Copromotor: Dr. ir. A.J.A. van Maris Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Rector Magnificus, voorzitter Prof. dr. J.T. Pronk, Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Dr. ir. A.J.A. van Maris, Technische Universiteit Delft, copromotor Prof. dr. J.G. Kuenen, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. R.A.L. Bovenberg, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen / DSM Prof. dr. B.M. Bakker, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Prof. dr. J. Förster, Technical University of Denmark / Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability Dr. R.A. Weusthuis, Wageningen University Prof. dr. M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, Technische Universiteit Delft, reservelid The studies presented in this thesis were performed at the Industrial Microbiology section, Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands and part of Program 1 ‘Yeast for chemicals, fuels and chemicals’ of the Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation, which is supported by the Netherlands Genomics Initiative. The cover of this thesis was designed by Manuel Toledo Otaegui (www.toledotaegui.com). The photograph was kindly provided by Michael Grab, rock balancing artist (www.gravityglue.com).
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Summary Report Oregon Department of Forestry Tribal-State Agency Government-To-Government Relations
    “Stewardship in Forestry” 2012 Summary Report Oregon Department of Forestry www.oregon.gov/odf Tribal-State Agency Government-to-Government Relations INTRODUCTION During 2012, the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) continued its involvement and communication with the Tribes as it conducted its business of forestry. This involvement is reflected in agency policy and agreements, training, education, informational materials, and participation in opportunities that further employee government-to-government relations’ knowledge and skills, and in direct consultation, communication, and cooperation. This report will discuss this departmental involvement, on a geographical basis, reporting on both program and district activities. AGENCY-WIDE ACTIVITIES ODF Salem Headquarters Executive Team Contacts: Doug Decker, State Forester, 503-945-7201, [email protected] Paul Bell, Deputy State Forester, 503-945-7205; [email protected] Agency’s Designated Representative Paul Bell, Deputy State Forester, continued as the agency Liaison for Government-to-Government Relations. Annual Government-to-Government Activities and Training Opportunities Paul Bell attended the State Agency Annual Training session on May 10, 2012. Paul and Dave Lorenz, Southern Oregon Area Director, both attended the Tribal Day celebrations at the State Capitol on May 11, 2012. Paul Bell attended and participated in the Annual Tribal Summit in November 2011. Doug Decker, Oregon State Forester, Paul Bell, and Dave Lorenz are all scheduled to attend the Annual Tribal Summit on November 29, 2012. ODF expects to continue participating in these and similar activities as they are available during the remainder of 2012 and throughout 2013. 2012 Summary Report Page 1 of 12 Oregon Department of Forestry Tribal-State Agency Government-to-Government Relations Involvement with the Natural Resources Cluster Group Paul Bell was the designated agency representative for the Natural Resources Cluster Work Group during this reporting time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Above Midtown, Where David Hammons, Fred Wilson, and Others Exhibited, Received Slightly More Press Than Kenkeleba
    The Black and White Show LORRAINE O’GRADY OUTSIDE, EAST SECOND STREET between Avenues B and C only by telegram. Give that boy another chance! But after in 1983 was Manhattan’s biggest open-air drug supermarket. promising two new canvases for the show, Basquiat pulled It was always deathly quiet except for the continual cries of out. Obligations to Bruno Bischofberger came fi rst. Walking vendors hawking competing brands of heroin: “3-5-7, 3-5-7” down East Second Street was like passing stacks of dreams in and “Toilet, Toilet.” From the steps of Kenkeleba, looking mounds. I asked muralist John Fekner to connect the inside across at the shooting galleries, you saw unrefl ecting win- with the outside. Downtown had a multitude of talents and dows and bricked-up facades, like doorless entrances to trends, some being bypassed by the stampede to cash in. The Hades. How did the junkies get inside? There was almost no show ended with twenty-eight artists, many still worried that traffi c. Behind the two columns fl anking Kenkeleba’s door- cadmium red cost thirty-two dollars a quart wholesale. Each way unexpectedly was a former Polish wedding palace in ele- day as I approached the block, I wondered, “Where is my gant decay owned by a black bohemian couple, Corrine mural?” On the day before the opening, it was there. John Jennings and Joe Overstreet. had done it at 4 am, when even junkies sleep. The gallery, invisible from the street, had fi ve rooms— Inside the gallery, it pleased me that, even across so many one, a cavern—plus a corridor, and dared you to use the styles, the images gave off language.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 24, No. 3 March 2020 You Can’T Buy It
    ABSOLUTELY FREE Vol. 24, No. 3 March 2020 You Can’t Buy It The NC Museum of Art in Raleigh, NC, will present Front Burner: Highlights in Contemporary North Carolina Painting, curated by Ashlynn Browning, on view in the Museum’s East Building, Level B, Joyce W. Pope Gallery, from March 7 through July 26, 2020. Work shown by Lien Truong © 2017 is I, “Buffalo”, and is acrylic, silk, fabric paint, antique gold-leaf obi thread, black salt and smoke on linen, 96 x 72 inches. I “Buffalo” was purchased by the North Carolina Museum of Art with funds from the William R. Roberson Jr. and Frances M. Roberson Endowed Fund for North Carolina Art. Photography is by Peter Paul Geoffrion. See article on Page 34. ARTICLE INDEX Advertising Directory This index has active links, just click on the Page number and it will take you to that page. Listed in order in which they appear in the paper. DONALD Weber Page 1 - Cover - NC Museum of Art - Lien Truong Page 3 - Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art Page 2 - Article Index, Advertising Directory, Contact Info, Links to blogs, and Carolina Arts site Page 4 - Linda Fantuzzo / City Gallery at Waterfront Park Page 4 - Editorial Commentary & Charleston Artist Guild Page 5 - Wells Gallery & Halsey McCallum Studio Page 5 - Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art & Robert Lange Studios “Italian Sojourn” Page 6 - Kathryn Whitaker Page 6 - Meyer Vogl Gallery & City of North Charleston Page 7 - Emerge SC, Helena Fox Fine Art, Corrigan Gallery, Halsey-McCallum Studio, Page 8 - Art League of Hilton Head Reception March 6th 5-8 pm | Painting Demonstration March 7th 2-5 pm Rhett Thurman, Anglin Smith Fine Art, Halsey Institute of Contemporary Art, Page 10 - Coastal Discovery Museum, Society of Bluffton Artists & Clemson University / Sikes Hall The Wells Gallery at the Sanctuary & Saul Alexander Foundation Gallery Exhibition through April 1st, 2020 Page 12 - Clemson University / Sikes Hall cont.
    [Show full text]
  • The WOODLANDER UPDATE
    The WOODLANDER UPDATE February 2011 News and Information for-and-about Small Woodland Owners Volume 31 Issue 1 INSIDE OSWA NEWS President’s Message 2 OSWA’s Annual Meeting Date Has Changed OSWA News 3, 8,10-12 The dates for OSWA’s 2011 Annual Meeting have been changed to June 23rd thru Tree Farm News 5 25th hosted by our Baker County Chapter. The meeting will be held in Baker City OR News 4,6-7,9 at the Best Western Sunridge Inn. A block of rooms are being held for our event. Congressman Greg Walden and new Oregon State Forester Doug Decker have been invited. This year’s theme is “Dealing with Changing Realities in Woodland Management”. Our Annual Meeting will be linked this year to the Oregon Tree DATES Farmer of the Year tour on Thursday June 23rd visiting the Harry Merlo woodlands in Union County. The OSWA and Oregon Tree Farm System Board meetings will UPCOMING MEETINGS be held Thursday night in Baker City. 2011 March 3 OSWA Exec Mtg The program on Friday, June 24th will include OSWA’s Annual Membership Meet- ing and speakers on topics relevant to the changes affecting woodlands management March 10 OSWA Board Call on family forests with a focus on the specific challenges east of the Cascade Moun- March 19 Tree School Clack. tains. A forum to facilitate a dialog between speakers and the audience will be used with the following topics planned: April 7 OSWA Exec Mtg April 14 OSWA Board Call New Partnerships - Public and Private April 21 Day at Capital New partnerships are needed to navigate the changing landscapes of forest manage- June 23-25 OSWA Annual Mtg ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter
    Table Of Contents Conservation Toolbox............................................................................................................................... 3 Outreach, Education, and Engagement................................................................................................... 4 Voluntary Conservation Programs......................................................................................................... 16 Conservation in Urban Areas.................................................................................................................. 23 Planning and Regulatory Framework..................................................................................................... 30 General References.................................................................................................................................. 50 Conservation Toolbox Everyone has a role in the successful implementation of the Oregon Conservation Strategy. The Conservation Toolbox provides recommendations to support implementation and suggestions for additional information and assistance. Key components of the Conservation Toolbox include: Outreach, Education, and Engagement Conservation in Urban Areas Oregon’s Existing Planning and Regulatory Framework Voluntary Conservation Programs General References: additional resources outside of the references provided in each section Outreach, Education, and Engagement Connecting people to nature is an important element of successful Conservation Strategy implementation. Acquiring
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Legacy Project Gilchrist Forest Gilchrist, OR, Oregon
    Project information last updated: 11/30/2012 10:56 PM Report prepared: 11/30/2012 11:00 PM Forest Legacy Project Gilchrist Forest Gilchrist, OR, Oregon FUNDING HISTORY FY 2014 Forest Legacy Program Funding $3,000,000 FY 2014 Non-Federal Cost Share $5,805,000 FY 2014 Project Costs $8,805,000 FY 2014 Project Acres 25,835 Forest Legacy Funding To Date $0 Total Project Costs $8,805,000 Total Project Acres 25,835 Size Non-Fed Tract Name (ac) Tract Cost FLP Funding Cost Share Status Gilchrist East 25,835 $8,805,000 $3,000,000 $5,805,000 In Review 2014 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The 25,835-acre Gilchrist State Forest parcel, to be protected in FEE, is a keystone property surrounded by three National Forests, a State forest, and BLM lands. The tract will be added to the newly created Gilchrist State Forest and will be managed for sustainable forestry and public recreation, generating significant revenue for Klamath County. The highest priority acquisition for Governor Kitzhaber, it represents a unique and affordable ($341/acre) investment in Oregon's future. Protection would eliminate 40 miles of inholding border for the 2 million acres of adjoining public lands. It will strengthen critical wildlife corridors, protect a large aquifer recharge area for the federally-designated Wild and Scenic View of project from Buell Butte (Photo by Doug Decker (Oregon Deschutes River, and restore a mature Ponderosa State Forester)) pine forest, one of the highest priority habitats in Oregon's Conservation Strategy. Because of its prime location--close to Bend and abundant outdoor recreation--and permissive zoning (with destination resort overlay), this parcel is seriously threatened by parcelization and conversion.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin
    SUMMER 2016 VOL. 10 NO. 2 NEWSLETTER OF THE DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY A MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TOD HEISLER Artist: Susan Luckey Higdon PHOTO: DRC STAFF Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin Twenty years ago, a small group of District, flows have increased signifi- irrigation purposes, and upstream people came together with a vision cantly below the district’s pumps. from irrigation diversions, so the of leaving our rivers and streams tools we have used in the past will better than they found them. Bend While these reaches have vastly not be enough to solve this complex was on the precipice of a population improved, we still have work to do. and far-reaching problem. boom, and the Deschutes River and Work like this is only possible The solution to restoring the Upper its tributaries had already been over- through building trust and strong allocated for nearly 100 years. Deschutes River lies in the way we relationships. Working with our use and manage water in Central Since 1996, the Deschutes River partners, the DRC has used flow Oregon. Our century old system will Conservancy has brought stakehold- restoration tools such as piping and not meet the changing demands for ers together across the basin to lining canals, water rights leasing, water in our basin. Cities with grow- restore 200 cubic feet per second and instream transfers to make real ing populations are challenged to (cfs) to our rivers. progress in these reaches. meet future water needs. Increased pressure from drought and litigation What does that look like? 20 years After 20 years, an area that has seen practically no restoration is the have created insecurity for commer- ago, Whychus Creek ran dry two out cial farmers who depend on unreli- of every three summers.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Data Appendices for Socioeconomic Monitoring of Nonmetropolitan Communities Following 25 Years of the Northwest Forest Plan (1994–2018)
    Methods and data appendices for socioeconomic monitoring of nonmetropolitan communities following 25 years of the Northwest Forest Plan (1994–2018). Supplemental Materials for Grinspoon, E., ed. Northwest Forest Plan—the first 25 years (1994–2018): socioeconomic monitoring results, Chapters 4 & 5. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW- GTR-xxx. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. xx p. Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon Michael R. Coughlan, Amelia Rhodeland, and Heidi Huber-Stearns Appendix A: Additional Methods A.1 Semi-structured Interview and Coding Protocols We used a semi-structured interview protocol with closed and open-ended questions in 10 key areas of interest and specific protocol addendums for agency personnel and timber industry stakeholders. A.1.1 Interview Guide Case study name:_ Case study id: Interview id: Date/time:______/_______ Interviewer: Location: Introduction to the Project Hello! Thank you for meeting with me today. Before we get started I would like to explain the interview process. This interview will be structured differently than an everyday conversation. I will be changing the subject from time to time, and I will not be responding in agreement or disagreement to the things that you are saying. I am going to be as neutral as possible, focusing my comments on letting you know when I understand what you are saying and when I do not, encouraging you to elaborate, or asking follow-up questions. When the Northwest Forest Plan was formally adopted in 1994, the US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management agreed to monitor changes to the forests they managed, as well as the social and economic characteristics of communities within the plan era.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Deschutes River Fish Managementplan
    Upper Deschutes River Fish ManagementPlan Draft May22, 1996 Oregon Department of Fish and Wtldlife Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Page 1 of 431 Upper Deschutes River Basin Fish Management Plan 1996 COMPLETED DISTRICT DRAFT 04/11/96 6:12:58 PM DESCHUTES RIVER from Wickiup Dam to Bend (North Canal Dam) including the tributaries Fall River and Spring River Overview This portion of the basin plan includes the Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam (RM 227) downstream to Bend (North Canal Dam, RM 164.8), Fall River, and Spring River. The Little Deschutes River, a major tributary which enters at RM 193, is not included because of its' length and connection with other waters in the basin. The Little Deschutes River will be presented in a separate section of the basin plan. In the Habitat and Fish Management sections of the following discussion, the Deschutes River will be divided into two sections; Wickiup Dam to Benham Falls (RM 181), and Benham Falls to Bend (North Canal Dam). The reason for this is based on stream morphology and changes in fish populations. Benham Falls is a high gradient natural cascade which separates the Deschutes River into two logical sections with low gradient above the falls and high gradient below. Similarly, fish population composition changes at Benham Falls with brown trout dominant above and rainbow trout dominant below. The remaining sections; location and ownership, fish stocking history, angling regulations, management issues, summary of alternatives and alternatives will be presented as (1) Deschutes River, and (2) Tributaries. In 1987, the Oregon legislature designated the section of Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam to General Patch Bridge, and from Harper Bridge to the north boundary of the Deschutes National Forest as a State Scenic Waterway.
    [Show full text]