Biomaterials and the Foreign Body Reaction: Surface Chemistry Dependent Macrophage Adhesion, Fusion, Apoptosis, and Cytokine Production
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BIOMATERIALS AND THE FOREIGN BODY REACTION: SURFACE CHEMISTRY DEPENDENT MACROPHAGE ADHESION, FUSION, APOPTOSIS, AND CYTOKINE PRODUCTION by JACQUELINE ANN JONES Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: James Morley Anderson, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Biomedical Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2007 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of ______________________________________________________ candidate for the Ph.D. degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Copyright © 2007 by Jacqueline Ann Jones All rights reserved iii Dedication This work is dedicated to… My ever loving and ever supportive parents: My mother, Iris Quiñones Jones, who gave me the freedom to be and to dream, inspires me with her passion and courage, and taught me the true meaning of friendship. My father, Glen Michael Jones, a natural-born teacher who taught me to be an inquisitive student of life, inspires me with his strength and perseverance, and gave me his kind, earnest heart that loves deeply and always strives to improve the lives of others. And to my younger siblings: Angie, the yin to my yang whose resoluteness and grace continually inspires me & Jeff, my comrade whose wit and charisma brings me joy …both of whom I am ever proud. Thank you. I am truly blessed to know and love you. iv Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction Chapter II: Proteomic Analysis and Quantification of Cytokines and Chemokines from Biomaterial Surface-Adherent Macrophages and Foreign Body Giant Cells Chapter III: Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors in the Foreign Body Reaction on Biomaterials Chapter IV: The Effects of Hydrophobic, Hydrophilic, & Ionic Surface Chemistries on Cellular Behaviors Chapter V: In vitro and in vivo Macrophage Behaviors on Surface Modified Polyurethanes Chapter VI: Dynamic Systems Model of Cellular Interactions with Biomaterial Surfaces Chapter VII: Conclusions Appendix: Self-Assembled Monolayers as a Model Material System for Material-Dependant Analysis of Macrophage/FBGC Cellular Behaviors v List of Tables Table 1.1. Adhesive Nature of Common Biomaterials. Table 1.2. Water Contact Angles of Clinically and Experimentally Utilized Polymers Table 1.3. Important Cytokines Involved in Inflammation. Table 1.4. Summary of Previous Findings of Macrophage-Derived Cytokine mRNA Expression. Table 2.1. Surface Chemistries of the Photografted Polymers. Table 2.2. Potential Differences in Cytokines/Chemokines Due to Material, Time, or IL-4 Addition as Analyzed by Cytokine Arrays Table 3.1. Matrix Metalloproteinases and their Functions Table 3.2. MMPs/TIMPs Detected in Cell Cultures at Day 7 using Antibody Arrays Table 3.3. MMP/TIMP Concentrations in Cell Cultures with RGD Substrate Over Time (ng/mL) Table 4.1. Comparison of Alternatively Activated and Classically Activated Macrophages Table 5.1. Chemical Description of Polyurethane Materials Table 5.2. Water Contact Angle Measurements on Polyurethane Materials Table 5.3. Differential Cell Analysis of Cell Layers at Day 4 Table 6.1. Estimated Rate Constants Utilized in Model Simulations Table 6.2. Effects of Material-Dependent Parameters on Cellular Behavior Table 6.3. Sensitivity Ranges for Each Parameter Table A.1. AFM Results for in-house SAM Surfaces Prior to and After Treatment Table A.2. Mixed Monocyte and Lymphocyte Non-Adherent Cell Population vi Table A.3.A. Commonly Used and Chosen Self-Assembled Monolayer Synthesis Techniques (Part I) Table A.3.B. Commonly Used and Chosen Self-Assembled Monolayer Synthesis Techniques (Part II) vii List of Figures Figure 1.1. Biological Responses to an Implanted Biomaterial Device. Figure 1.2. Relationship of Aqueous Contact Angles and Cell Adhesion. Adapted from reference [11]. Conditionally (non)adhesive surfaces will typically depend on the degree of hydration of the hydrophilic surface. Hence, hydrated PEG/PEO is conditionally (non)adhesive, while glass is adhesive. Aqueous adhesion o tension is defined as τ = γlvcosθ(dyne/cm). Figure 1.3. The Progression of Monocytes, Macrophages, and Foreign Body Giant Cells. Figure 1.4. Cascade of Events Involved in Apoptosis. Figure 1.5. The tissue/implant interface with protein adsorption, macrophage adhesion and activation, cytokine and growth factor production, and cellular synthesis and proliferation. Figure 2.1. Cellular/Biomaterial/Cytokine Interactions of Inflammation and Wound Healing. Figure 2.2. Adherent Cell Densities (A) and FBGC Formation (B). Data represents the mean ± the standard error of the mean (n=3). “*” indicates statistical significance in comparison to PET (p<0.05). Figure 2.3. IL-1β (A), IL-6 (B), and IL-10 (C) Cytokine Production from Macrophages and FBGCs Adherent to Photograft Polymers. Mean ± SEM, n=4. Figure 2.4. Effect of IL-4 on IL-10 (A&B), IL-8 (C&D), and MIP-1β (E&F) Production at days 7 and 10. Closed: without IL-4. Open: with added IL-4. Mean ± SEM, n=4. Figure 2.5. Chemokine IL-8 (A) and MIP-1β (B) Expression over Time. “*” indicates a statistical difference in comparison to all other materials, while “^” indicates a statistical difference in comparison to PET. Mean ± SEM, n=4. Figure 2.6. Cellular activation as a Function of IL-1β (A), IL-6 (B) and IL-10 (C) Production per Cell. Mean ± SEM, n=3. Figure 2.7. IL-8 (A) and MIP-1β (B) Production per Cell. Mean ± SEM, n=3. viii Figure 3.1. Macrophage/FBGC Secretion of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (A) and Tissue Inhibitors of Matrix Metalloproteinases, TIMP-1 (B) and TIMP-2 (C). Mean ± SEM, n=4. Figure 3.2. Effect of IL-4 on MMP-9 (A&B), TIMP-1 (C&D), TIMP-2 (E&F) Production at Days 7 and 10. Open: with added IL-4. Closed: without IL-4. “*” indicates statistical difference between with and without IL-4. Mean ± SEM, n=4. Figure 3.3. MMP-9 (A), TIMP-1 (B), and TIMP-2 (C) Production per Cell. Mean ± SEM, n=3. Figure 3.4. The Effects of MMP Pharmalogical Inhibitors ECG (A), NNGH (B), CL-82198 (C), and Actinonin (D) on Macrophage Adhesion (■) and Fusion (●). Mean ± SEM, n=3. Figure 4.1. Disparate Effects of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surfaces on Macrophage Adhesion (A) and Fusion (B). Mean ± SEM, n=3. “*” indicates that these values for the hydrophilic surface are statistically less than the hydrophobic surface values (p<0.05). Figure 4.2. Disparate Effects of Hydrophilic Non-Ionic and Ionic Surfaces on Macrophage Adhesion (A) and Fusion (B). Mean ± SEM, n=3. “*” indicates that these values for the hydrophilic/ionic surfaces are statistically greater than the hydrophilic/neutral surface values (p<0.05). Figure 4.3. Direct Comparison of Cellular Adhesion (A), Cytokine Concentration (B), and Cellular Activation (C) on Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic/Neutral Surfaces. Cellular activation equals cytokine concentration measured in 1mL of media normalized to the total number of adherent cells. Mean ± SEM, n=3,4. “*” indicates that these values for the hydrophilic surface are statistically less than the hydrophobic surface values (p<0.05). Figure 4.4. Cytokine/Chemokine Concentration (A-D) and Cellular Activation (E-H) on Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic/Neutral Surfaces. Cellular activation equals cytokine/chemokine concentration measured in 1mL of media normalized to the total number of adherent cells. Notated numbers indicate the x fold increase between the values for BDEDTC and PAAm. Mean ± SEM, n=3. “*” indicates that values statistically greater on the hydrophilic surface compared to the hydrophobic surface values (p<0.05). Figure 4.5. MMP/TIMP Concentration (A-C) and Cellular Activation (D-F) on Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic/Neutral Surfaces. Cellular activation equals cytokine concentration measured in 1mL of media ix normalized to the total number of adherent cells. Notated numbers indicate the x fold change between the values for BDEDTC and PAAm. Mean ± SEM, n=3. “*” indicates that values statistically greater on the hydrophilic surface compared to the hydrophobic surface values (p<0.05). Figure 4.6. Cytokine/Chemokine Concentration (A-E) and Cellular Activation (E-J) on Hydrophilic/Neutral and Hydrophilic/Ionic Surfaces. Cellular activation equals cytokine/chemokine concentration measured in 1mL of media normalized to the total number of adherent cells. Notated numbers indicate the x fold increase between the values for PAAm and PAANa or DMAPAAmMeI. Mean ± SEM, n=3. “*” indicates that values statistically greater on the hydrophilic/neutral surface compared to the hydrophilic/ionic surface values (p<0.05). Figure 4.7. MMP/TIMP Concentration (A-C) and Cellular Activation (D-F) on Hydrophilic/Neutral and Hydrophilic/Ionic Surfaces. Cellular activation equals cytokine/chemokine concentration measured in 1mL of media normalized to the total number of adherent cells. Notated numbers indicate the x fold increase between the values for PAAm and PAANa or DMAPAAmMeI. Mean ± SEM, n=3. “*” indicates that values statistically greater on the hydrophilic/neutral surface compared to the hydrophilic/ionic surface values (p<0.05). Figure 5.1. Monocyte/Macrophage Adhesion on Modified and Unmodified