Public Broadcasting Services Extended Public Service Obligation 2009/10 Report by the Auditor General June 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Drama Directory
2015 UPDATE CONTENTS Acknowlegements ..................................................... 2 Latvia ......................................................................... 124 Introduction ................................................................. 3 Lithuania ................................................................... 127 Luxembourg ............................................................ 133 Austria .......................................................................... 4 Malta .......................................................................... 135 Belgium ...................................................................... 10 Netherlands ............................................................. 137 Bulgaria ....................................................................... 21 Norway ..................................................................... 147 Cyprus ......................................................................... 26 Poland ........................................................................ 153 Czech Republic ......................................................... 31 Portugal ................................................................... 159 Denmark .................................................................... 36 Romania ................................................................... 165 Estonia ........................................................................ 42 Slovakia .................................................................... 174 -
Annual Report 2020
ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Annual Report 2020 Published in 2021 by the Broadcasting Authority 7 Mile End Ħamrun HMR 1719 Malta Compiled by the Broadcasting Authority Designed & Printed by: Progress Press Co. Ltd. Mrieħel The Hon. Dr Robert Abela K.U.O.M., B.A., LL.D., Adv. Trib. Melit, M.P. Prime Minister Office of the Prime Minister Auberge Castille Valletta March 2020 Honourable Prime Minister, Broadcasting Authority Annual Report 2020 Published in 2021 by the Broadcasting Authority 7 Mile End In accordance with sub-article (1) of Article 30 of the Broadcasting Act, Chapter 350 of the Laws of Malta, we have pleasure in forwarding the Broadcasting Authority’s Annual Report for 2020 Ħamrun HMR 1719 Malta Compiled by the Broadcasting Authority Designed & Printed by: Progress Press Co. Ltd. Mrieħel Yours faithfully, Frank V. Farrugia Dr Joanna Spiteri Chairman Chief Executive Officer Contents 1. MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN 2. REVIEW OF THE YEAR BY THE CEO IN CHRONOLOGY 3. STAFF RECRUITMENT 4. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES 5. BROADCASTING LICENCES • 5.1 Radio Broadcasting Licences • 5.1.1 Digital radio stations • 5.1.2 Community radio stations • 5.1.3 Drive in cinemas 6. COMPLAINTS • 6.01 PN vs PBS Ltd – Xarabank [13th March] • 6.02 PN vs PBS Ltd – Xarabank [20th March] • 6.03 Dr Silvio DeBono, Managing Director IDEA Group vs PBS Ltd – Illum ma’ Steph [12th May] • 6.04 PN vs PBS Ltd – press conference address by the Prime Minister [18th May] • 6.05 Imperium Europa vs PBS Ltd – TVM news 16th April and 29th May and the total exclusion of Imperium Europa in current affairs programmes. -
Must-Carry Rules, and Access to Free-DTT
Access to TV platforms: must-carry rules, and access to free-DTT European Audiovisual Observatory for the European Commission - DG COMM Deirdre Kevin and Agnes Schneeberger European Audiovisual Observatory December 2015 1 | Page Table of Contents Introduction and context of study 7 Executive Summary 9 1 Must-carry 14 1.1 Universal Services Directive 14 1.2 Platforms referred to in must-carry rules 16 1.3 Must-carry channels and services 19 1.4 Other content access rules 28 1.5 Issues of cost in relation to must-carry 30 2 Digital Terrestrial Television 34 2.1 DTT licensing and obstacles to access 34 2.2 Public service broadcasters MUXs 37 2.3 Must-carry rules and digital terrestrial television 37 2.4 DTT across Europe 38 2.5 Channels on Free DTT services 45 Recent legal developments 50 Country Reports 52 3 AL - ALBANIA 53 3.1 Must-carry rules 53 3.2 Other access rules 54 3.3 DTT networks and platform operators 54 3.4 Summary and conclusion 54 4 AT – AUSTRIA 55 4.1 Must-carry rules 55 4.2 Other access rules 58 4.3 Access to free DTT 59 4.4 Conclusion and summary 60 5 BA – BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 61 5.1 Must-carry rules 61 5.2 Other access rules 62 5.3 DTT development 62 5.4 Summary and conclusion 62 6 BE – BELGIUM 63 6.1 Must-carry rules 63 6.2 Other access rules 70 6.3 Access to free DTT 72 6.4 Conclusion and summary 73 7 BG – BULGARIA 75 2 | Page 7.1 Must-carry rules 75 7.2 Must offer 75 7.3 Access to free DTT 76 7.4 Summary and conclusion 76 8 CH – SWITZERLAND 77 8.1 Must-carry rules 77 8.2 Other access rules 79 8.3 Access to free DTT -
Radio and Television Audience Assessment October 2017
RADIO AND TELEVISION AUDIENCE ASSESSMENT OCTOBER 2017 PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER 2017 BY THE BROADCASTING AUTHORITY 7, MILE END ROAD, ĦAMRUN HMR1719, MALTA TEL: +356 2201 6000 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEB: http://www.ba.org.mt CONTENTS Page 1. Sampling and Sample Profile 1 2. Radio Audiences and Assessment 4 2.1 Radio Audience Reach 4 2.2 DAB+ 6 2.3 Radio Audience Shares 8 2.3.1 Average Audiences 8 2.3.2 Peak Audiences 9 2.3.3 Radio Audience Share by Half-hour slots 10 2.3.4 Daily Average Hours of Radio Consumption 11 2.3.5 Radio Stations Audience Share 12 3. TV Audiences and Assessment 13 3.1 TV Audience Reach 13 3.2 TV Services 15 3.3 TV Programme Genres 17 3.4 TV Audience Shares 19 3.4.1 Average Audiences 19 3.4.2 Peak Audiences by Station 20 3.4.3 TV Audience Share by Half-hour Slots 20 3.4.4 Daily Audience Hours of TV Consumption 21 3.4.5 TV Stations Audience Share 22 4. Children watching TV 23 4.1 Children 9-15 years old 23 4.2 Programmes followed by 9-15 year olds 24 Appendices A. Questionnaire 25 B. Nationwide Licensed Broadcasting Stations 28 C. Radio Audiences by Half-Hour Slots – Monday to Sunday 29 D. TV Audiences by Half-Hour Slots – Monday to Sunday 36 iii iv 1. SAMPLING AND SAMPLE PROFILE For the year 2017 the Broadcasting Authority interference; with DAB respondents never had made arrangements with the N.S.O.so that data to remember the station’s frequency; the is collected for one month within a specific display on the radio-set shows the station quarter. -
Monitoring Media Pluralism in Europe: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor 2017 in the European Union, FYROM, Serbia & Turkey
Monitoring Media Pluralism in Europe: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor 2017 in the European Union, FYROM, Serbia & Turkey Country Report: Malta Author: Iva Nenadic TABLE OF CONTENT 1. About the Project 1 2. Introduction 2 3. Results from the data collection: assessment of the risks to media pluralism 3 3.1. Basic Protection (36% - medium risk) 4 3.2. Market Plurality (61% - medium risk) 5 3.3. Political Independence (63% - medium risk) 7 3.4. Social Inclusiveness (58% - medium risk) 9 4. Conclusions 11 References 12 Annexe 1. Country Team 12 Annexe 2. Group of Experts 13 1. ABOUT THE PROJECT 1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT The Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) is a research tool that was designed to identify potential risks to media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union. This narrative report has been produced within the framework of the second EU-wide implementation of the MPM, carried out in 2017. The implementation was conducted in 28 EU Member States, Serbia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYRoM) and Turkey with the support of a grant awarded by the European Union to the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) at the European University Institute. 1.2 METHODOLOGICAL NOTE The research was based on a standardised questionnaire and apposite guidelines that were developed by the CMPF. The data collection for Malta was carried out centrally by the CMPF team between August and December, 2017. A group of national experts was consulted to ensure accurate and reliable findings, and to review the answers to particularly evaluative questions (see Annexe 2 for the details on procedure and the list of experts). -
Drama Directory 2014
2014 UPDATE CONTENTS Acknowlegements ..................................................... 2 Latvia .......................................................................... 122 Introduction ................................................................. 3 Lithuania ................................................................... 125 Luxembourg ............................................................ 131 Austria .......................................................................... 4 Malta .......................................................................... 133 Belgium ...................................................................... 10 Netherlands ............................................................. 135 Bulgaria ....................................................................... 21 Norway ..................................................................... 145 Cyprus ......................................................................... 26 Poland ........................................................................ 151 Czech Republic ......................................................... 31 Portugal .................................................................... 157 Denmark .................................................................... 36 Romania ................................................................... 160 Estonia ........................................................................ 42 Slovakia ................................................................... -
Republic of Malta
Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF MALTA EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 3 June 2017 OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Final Report Warsaw 9 October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................... 3 III. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT ................................................................. 3 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................... 4 V. ELECTORAL SYSTEM .......................................................................................................... 5 VI. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................................... 6 VII. VOTER REGISTRATION ...................................................................................................... 7 VIII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION ............................................................................................ 8 IX. CAMPAIGN .............................................................................................................................. 9 X. POLITICAL PARTY AND CAMPAIGN FINANCE ......................................................... 11 A. DONATIONS AND EXPENDITURE ............................................................................................... 11 B. OVERSIGHT, REPORTING -
Making Digital Broadcasting Available to All
Further to the publication of the consultation document titled “Making digital broadcasting accessible to all” published on the 18th September 2007, the MCA and the BA are publishing this presentation, which highlights the key aspects of the consultation document, for ease of reference. Until further notice, the closing date for this consultation process is currently set at the 15th of February 2008. Consultation on Broadcasting that meets General Interest Objectives (GIOs) Summary Presentation 11th December 2007 Purpose of Presentation • This presentation is meant to highlight the key aspects that are dealt with in the Consultation document Background to the Consultation (1) Principles established in 2005 ‘umbrella’ DTTV Policy • February 2005 – Govt Policy on DTTV established the reservation of 3 frequencies for the purpose of broadcasting that meets General Interest Objectives. • As a rule assignment of rights of use of frequencies can only be made under competitive conditions if demand exceeds supply. • Direct Assignment of rights of use of frequencies can only be on the basis of clearly defined General Interest Objectives (GIOs). • Policy established the differentiation of roles of network operator and broadcaster under new (Digital Terrestrial) technology paradigm – one frequency = multiple broadcasters. • Document also highlighted need for dedicated policy iro. Broadcasting that meets GIO. • Assignment of frequencies to networks is an MCA function. • Direct allotment of transmission capacity to Broadcasters meeting GIOs is essentially a BA function. • Broadcasters qualifying as meeting the GIOs will share the 3 frequencies. Background to the Consultation (2) Key Developments in 2006/7 • RRC06 – resulting in a restriction on the number of coordinated frequencies • Maltacom takeover of Multiplus • Long drawn out coordination exercise with Italy • Impact on: – Govt DTTV policy – GIO Policy – Efforts to strengthen the information society • Spectrum carries ever increasing value as a national resource. -
International Affairs
Annual Report 2013 Ministry for Home Affairs and National Security OFFICE OF THE PERMANENT SECRETARY DIRECTORATE GENERAL (STRATEGY AND SUPPORT) The Directorate General (Strategy and Support) manages and provides central corporate support services to the Permanent Secretary and to the various directorates, departments, entities and organisations within the Ministry on corporate issues such as financial planning and management, public procurement, human resources, operations and office management. The Directorate ensures the timely and accurate preparation and production of all control and management information and the provision of the full range of support services to the Permanent Secretary and operational management. The Directorate also coordinates and ensures uniformity and compliance in implementation of the policies and guidelines laid down by the Office of the Prime Minister (including the Public Administration Human Resources Offices) and Ministry of Finance (particularly the Budget Office and the Department of Contracts). It also strives to provide the required resources to the various Directorates making up the Office of the Permanent Secretary so as to ensure their effective and efficient functioning, and contributes to the collective management of the Ministry for Home Affairs and National Security. FINANCE AND OFFICE MANAGEMENT The Directorate General Strategy and Support handles all financial and procurement matters related to the Minister’s Secretariat, the Office of the Permanent Secretary, EU Affairs Directorate, Programme Implementation Directorate, Policy Development Directorate, Manager Airport Security, Detention Services Unit, Office of the Commissioner for Refugees, the Third Country Nationals Unit, Central Visa Unit and the Directorate of Citizenship and Expatriate Affairs. The Directorate General is also responsible for effecting payment in tranches to the Public Broadcasting Services Ltd, Agency for Welfare of Asylum Seekers, Emigrants Commission, Identity Malta Agency, Malta Film Commission and Malta Broadcasting Authority. -
Television Programmes As a Resource for Teaching Italian
Vol:1 No.1 2003 3-24 www.educ.um.edu.mt/jmer Television programmes as a resource for teaching Italian Sandro Caruana Sandro Caruana (1968, Sliema, Malta) completed a dottorato di ricerca (Ph.D.) in Linguistics at the Università degli studi di Pavia (Italy) in 2001. His main interests are General and Applied Linguistics, particularly the Methodology of teaching Italian as a second language. His research focuses mainly on the linguistic influence of the media and on the role of the media in language learning. His work has recently been published in Italy. (Mezzi di comunicazione e input linguistico. L’acquisizione dell’italiano L2 a Malta, Franco Angeli ed., Milano). He has lectured at the universities of Milan and of Bergamo and presented papers at international conferences. He currently holds the post of lecturer at the University of Malta where he carries out duties both at the G.F.Abela Junior College and at the Department of Arts and Languages in Education. Abstract: The island of Malta offers an ideal setting to investigate the extent to which the linguistic input from the media may be significant in second language (L2) acquisition. Although Italian is not spoken in Malta, many individuals are exposed to this language via the media as Italian television programmes are popular on the island. In this article the extent to which Italian may be acquired via the media is discussed by taking into account research carried out among guided and spontaneous learners of Italian L2. Despite the unidirectional nature of television and the absence of the possibility to interact and negotiate so as to modify or simplify the L2 input, results show that L2 input from Italian television programmes in Malta may help to learn the language, even in the case of learners who have never undergone formal instruction in the L2. -
MALTESE E-NEWSLETTER 354 January 2020 1
MALTESE e-NEWSLETTER 354 January 2020 Message from the Prime Minister of Malta 1 MALTESE e-NEWSLETTER 354 January 2020 Dr. Robert Abela to Maltese Living Abroad Qed nibgħat dan il-messaġġ għall-ewwel darba f’bħala Prim Ministru tal-Maltin u Għawdxin. Ninsabu kemm ninsabu ’l bogħod minn xulxin, nibqa’ dejjem imsaħħar bil-valuri sbieħ li jgħaqqduna u li sawru l-identita’ tagħna bħala Maltin matul il-milja tas-snin. Dawn il-valuri ta’ poplu bieżel u reżiljenti ħarġu fid-deher matul is- sena li waslet biex tintemm. Sena li matulha d-dinja kollha, inkluż pajjiżna għex żmien ta’ sfida kbira minħabba l-pandemija tal-COVID-19. L-imxija wettaqna riformi storiċi biex saħħaħna l- ħarbtitilna l-ħajja tagħna ta’ kuljum u l-istil ta’ istituzzjonijiet ta’ pajjiżna u s-Saltna tad-Dritt. ħajjitna kien jinħtieġ li jinbidel radikalment. Riformi li mhux biss intlaqgħu u ġew imfaħħra mill- istituzzjonijiet Ewropew iżda li tqiesu mudell għal Nistqarr li ma kinetx faċli. Ftit ġimgħat wara li pajjiżi oħrajn. assumejt l-irwol ta’ Prim Ministru, pajjiżna kellu Il-missjoni ewlenija tal-Gvern immexxi minni tibqa’ jaffronta din l-isfida bla preċedent. dik li nwieżnu lil dawk l-aktar li għandhom bżonn Iżda meta nħares lura nħossni kburi bil-ħidma li u nippremjaw il-bżulija tal-familji u n-negozji rnexxielna nagħmlu bħala pajjiż magħqud u tagħna. Dan se nagħmluh bil-miżuri soċjali li flimkien. Għalkemm ma kellna l-ebda manwal li ħabbarna fil-Budget għas-sena d-dieħla fosthom jiggwidana, xorta bħala pajjiż, irnexxielna nibqgħu żieda oħra fil-pensjonijiet, titjib fiċ-children’s għaddejjin. -
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 Before The
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) International Comparison Requirements Pursuant ) to the Broadband Data Improvement Act ) IB Docket No. 10-171 ) International Broadband Data Report ) ) ) ) SECOND REPORT Adopted: May 20, 2011 Released: May 20, 2011 By the Chief, International Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This second International Broadband Data Report (IBDR or Report) presents comparative data on the extent of international broadband service capability, based on the best data sources available to the Commission at this time.1 Our analysis of this data suggests a positive correlation between broadband adoption and income, population size, and population density. These factors help explain the United States’ rates of broadband adoption compared to other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries. Based on OECD data, the United States ranks ninth for mobile broadband adoption on a per capita basis,2 and 12th for fixed (e.g., DSL or cable) broadband on a per household basis.3 U.S. fixed broadband adoption lags behind such countries as South Korea, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Germany, but exceeds adoption rates in Japan and the EU average.4 This Report also compares data on average actual download speeds reported by a sample of consumers in a number of U.S. and foreign cities and finds that some large European and Asian cities exhibit a significant edge over comparable U.S. cities in reported download speeds, though reported speeds for some other international cities are roughly comparable to speeds in many U.S.