Purple Martin Population Status, Nesting Habitat Characteristics, and Management in Sacramento, California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Purple Martin Population Status, Nesting Habitat Characteristics, and Management in Sacramento, California PURPLE MARTIN POPULATION STATUS, NESTING HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS, AND MANAGEMENT IN SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DANIEL A. AIROLA, Jones & Stokes, 2600 V Street, Sacramento, California 95818 JESSE GRANTHAM, National Audubon Society, 205 N. Carrizo Street, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 (currentaddress: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hopper MountainNational Wildlife Refuge Complex, 2493 PortolaRoad, Suite A, Ventura, California 93003) ABSTRACT:The PurpleMartin (Prognesubis) has been eliminated from mostof California'sCentral Valley. The last known populationnests in elevatedroadways ("bridges")in the city of Sacramento. We reviewed bird records (1949-1990), conductedsurveys to assesspopulation size and trend (1991-2002), and evaluated managementactions to protectand increasepopulations. Martins ceased nesting in buildingsin Sacramentoin the 1960s and 1970s as the EuropeanStarling (Sturnus vulgaris)population exploded, but adoption of verticalweep holes for nesting beneathbridges in the 1960s hasallowed martins to persist.The knownSacramento populationincreased from fourto sevencolonies and from approximately105 to 135 nestingpairs from 1992 to 2002. Martin coloniesare locatedin longer(>85 m) bridge sectionsthat provideat least 6 m of unobstructedairspace beneath the colonies. Managementhas included a pilot projectto insertwire "nestguards" in weep holesto increasesurvival of young and protecting nesting coloniesduring construction activitiesnear nests.Initial resultsindicate that nestguards reduce mortality of young fallingfrom nests and do not resultin increasedcompetition for nestsites by starlings and other species.Exclusion of martinsfrom nestingat a large colonyto prevent disturbancefrom a constructionproject reduced nesting use of the site;such exclusion is not considerednecessary to protect nestingbirds. Martin recoverymay require substantialmanagement, including protecting and enhancingexisting colonies, en- couragingcolonization of otherelevated road sites, establishing martin use of artificial neststructures in unoccupiedregions, and enlistingpublic adoption of management responsibility. The PurpleMartin (?rognesubis) was once considered"fairly common" in California(Grinnell and Miller 1944) but recentlyhas been considered rare to very uncommonin the state (Garrettand Dunn 1981, Zeiner et al. 1990, Williams 1998). The state of California identifiedthe martin as a species of special concern becauseof a well-documentedand drastic population decline and substantialreduction in the species' geographic range(Remsen 1978). A reviewof the statusof the martinin Californiaalso confirmedthat Sacramentoremains the only locationin the CentralValley where the speciesis known to breed(Williams 1998). The major suggestedcause of martin declinein Californiais competition for nest holes with the nonnativeEuropean Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) (Remsen1978, Garrett and Dunn 1981, Williams 1998, 2002). Detrimen- tal effectsof starlingand HouseSparrow (Passer domesticus) competition are well documentedelsewhere in the U.S. (Brown 1981, 1997) but not specificallyin California.Williams (1998) has also suggestedthat lossof riparianhabitat and snags that representedsuitable nesting habitat may have Western Birds 34:235-251, 2003 235 PURPLE MARTIN NESTING IN SACRAMENTO contributed to martin decline in California. Pesticide effects have not been documented but cannot be dismissed. In the easternU.S., PurpleMartins have relied on birdhousesand gourds as nestingsites for many years(Jackson and Tate 1974, Brown 1997). In the west, Purple Martinshave only recentlymade substantialuse of nest boxesin Oregon,Washington, and BritishColumbia (Copley et al. 1999, Fouts 1996, Horvath 1999). In California,martins formerly nested com- monly in buildingsbut have seldomused nest boxes (Grinnelland Miller 1944, Garrett and Dunn 1981, Williams 1998). In the 1930s and 1940s, useof buildingsin citiesand towns in Californiawas thought to have increasedthe state'smartin populationand range (Willett 1933, Grinnell and Miller 1944). Today, however,no urban areasexcept Sacramentoare known to supportnesting martins (Williams 1998). As summarizedby Williams(1998), PurpleMartins were reported nesting in treesin Sacramentoas earlyas 1853 (Baird1858) and were documented nestingin buildingsas early as 1924 (Bryant 1924). Nestingin buildings occurredmainly in holesformed by hemicylindricalroof tiles(i.e., Spanish tiles).No recentnests have been reported in buildingsin Sacramento(B. and H. Kimball pers. comm.); all recent nestinghas occurredin weep holes beneathbridges (including elevated freeways). We initiatedthis study in 1991 and 1992 to evaluatethe recenthistorical and current populationstatus and nest site characteristicsof the Purple Martin in Sacramentoand to assessthe effectivenessof management actionsfor the species.Grantham continued monitoring through 1997 at one site(see Study Area), and Airola reinitiated monitoring in 2002 to assess the populationtrend. This assessmentalso incorporatesinformation col- lectedat Sacramentocolonies by Williams(1998). The study'sobjectives were to: ß identifyrecent historical and currentmartin colonies in the Sacramento area. ß evaluatechanges in localdistribution and habitatuse at martin colony locations. ß estimatecurrent populations and recenttrends at colonies. ß identifyfactors that may influenceselection of colonysites. ß evaluateeffectiveness of recent managementactions to protect and enhancemartin nestinghabitat. ß identifythreats to coloniesand additionalresearch and management needs. STUDY AREA We surveyedfor Purple Martins at bridgesand buildingsin the Sacra- mentoarea wherethey had previouslybeen observed nesting, as well as at other bridgeswith similarcharacteristics. All sitesused by martinswere in bridgesbuilt of steel and concretebox girders(Tonias 1995). All these bridgesspan urban areas and railroad tracks; none crosseswater. The bridgessupport an enclosedchamber beneath the roadsurface. Weep holes on the undersideof the chamberrelieve air pressureduring heating and 236 PURPLE MARTIN NESTING IN SACRAMENTO coolingand draincondensation, but theydo not drainwater from the road surface. The downtownarea contains the greatestnumber of bridgesin the region. We surveyedsuitable bridge sections to locatecolonies in 1991, 1992, and 2002. Colonieswere definedas occupiedsites separatedby areas of unsuitableor unoccupiedhabitat that exceedthe typicaldistances between nestswithin occupiedsites. We studiedfour occupiedcolony sites in detailin 1991 and 1992: ß I Street--Interstate 5 at I Street in Old Sacramento. ß 20th Street--U.S. Highway50 between19th and 21st streets. ß Broadway--thejunction of State Route 99 and U.S. 50, aboveand adjacentto Broadway. ß 35th Street--U.S. 50 between 34th Street and Stockton Boulevard. Granthamcontinued monitoring the 35th Streetcolony through 1997. We studiedthree additionaloccupied colonies in 2002: ß Sutterville--SuttervilleRoad overpassof the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)yard. ß S Street--CapitalCity Freeway(Business Route 80) at S Street. ß RosevilleRoad--I-80 and the adjacentlight rail parking-accessramp above Roseville Road and the UPRR tracks. METHODS Review of Recent Historical Records Becauseavailable information on the earlyhistorical status of the Purple Martin is limitedand hasbeen summarized(Williams 1998), we confinedthe statusreview to the period since the mid-1900s, for which a substantial numberof recordswere available.We reviewedapproximately 970 martin records(1949-1990) from the Sacramentoarea that Betty and Harold Kimballcompiled from their personalfield notes, as wellas recordsof other membersof the SacramentoAudubon Society (unpubl. data). Other local recordsfrom CaliforniaDepartment of Fishand Game fileswere provided by J. Estepand R. Schlorff(pers. comm.). Many recent historicalrecords noted locationsof birds near known nestingcolonies but did not confirm breedingactivity. We considered breedingat a site to be possibleif recordsnoted that birdswere present during the peak breedingseason (mid-April through July) at a specific buildingor site,probable if birdswere reportedentering holes or carrying nestingmaterial, and confirmed if adultswere observedcarrying food to a nest hole or feedingdependent young, if juvenileswere observedwithin holes,or if recentlyfledged juveniles were reportednear a knownsite. We used1965-1990 recordsonly to documenttrends in colonylocations and nestinghabitats. We could not determineabundance and detailed occupationpatterns because of limitedinformation on nestingactivity. Also, the reportedincidental counts of martinsare not reliableindicators of colony size(see Results). The firstyear of siteoccupation was especially difficult to establishbecause all potentialsites were not surveyedsystematically. Site 237 PURPLE MARTIN NESTING IN SACRAMENTO abandonmentdates are more reliablebecause once the siteswere known, observerstended to visitthem annually(B. and H. Kimballpers. comm.). Surveysfor BreedingColonies We surveyedpreviously reported martin coloniesin 1991, 1992, and 2002. We also surveyedmany other sites in Sacramentothat could be nestinghabitat; these includedlonger sectionsof elevatedfreeway, over- passeswith weep holes,and buildingswith Spanishtile roofs.We surveyed 25 potentialnesting areas from April to July by searchingfor flying and perchedbirds. We conductedmost surveysbefore 11:00 or after 17:00 becausebirds tended to be more activeduring these periods, especially on hot days(Airola unpubl. data). PopulationEstimation at Colonies
Recommended publications
  • Exploring Shifts in Migration Phenology and Breeding Distribution of Declining North American Avian Aerial Insectivores
    EXPLORING SHIFTS IN MIGRATION PHENOLOGY AND BREEDING DISTRIBUTION OF DECLINING NORTH AMERICAN AVIAN AERIAL INSECTIVORES A thesis submitted to the Kent State University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors by Nora Honkomp May, 2021 Thesis written by Nora Honkomp Approved by ________________________________________________________________, Advisor ______________________________________,Chair, Department of Biological Sciences Accepted by ___________________________________________________, Dean, Honors College ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES…..……………………………………………….………………….iv LIST OF TABLES………..…………………………………………….………………....v ACKNOWLEDGMENT…………………….…………….……………………………..vi CHAPTERS I. INTRODUCTION……………….………………….…………….………1 II. METHODS……………………….………………………………….…..16 Migration Timing Analysis……………….…………………………..….16 Breeding Distribution Analysis………………………………………..…27 III. RESULTS……………………………………………………………..…30 Migration Timing Analysis………………………………………………30 Breeding Distribution Analysis………………………………………….40 IV. DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………47 LITERATURE CITED…………………………………………………………………..56 APPENDIX........................................................................................................................61 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Number of checklists by day of year ………………………......………..……....21 Figure 2. Latitude of sighting by day of year .…………………………………………......22 Figure 3. Start and end dates for spring and fall migration..................................................24 Figure 4. Change
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Martin Monitoring After a Wildfire in the Lincoln
    PURPLE MARTIN MONITORING AFTER A WILDFIRE IN THE LINCOLN NATIONAL FOREST, NEW MEXICO – 2007 RESULTS Submitted To: Prepared By: USDA Forest Service Hawks Aloft, Inc. Danney Salas P.O. Box 10028 Sacramento Ranger District Albuquerque, New Mexico 87184 1101 New York Avenue (505) 828-9455 Alamogordo, New Mexico 87571 Website: www.hawksaloft.org E-mail Contact: [email protected] Purple Martin Conservation Association John Tautin 301 Peninsula Dr., Suite 6 Erie, Pennsylvania 16505 15 February 2008 Purple Martins in the Lincoln National Forest TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................3 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................4 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................7 DISCUSSION......................................................................................................................9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................13 LITERATURE CITED ......................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Nest Construction in Swallows (Hirundinidae) Is Associated with the Decrease of Clutch Size
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 38/1 711-716 21.7.2006 The evolution of nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is associated with the decrease of clutch size P. HENEBERG A b s t r a c t : Variability of the nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is more diverse than in other families of oscine birds. I compared the nest-building behaviour with pooled data of clutch size and overall hatching success for 20 species of swallows. The clutch size was significantly higher in temperate cavity-adopting swallow species than in species using other nesting modes including species breeding in evolutionarily advanced mud nests (P<0.05) except of the burrow-excavating Bank Swallow. Decrease of the clutch size during the evolution of nest construction is not compensated by the increase of the overall hatching success. K e y w o r d s : Hirundinidae, nest construction, clutch size, evolution Birds use distinct methods to avoid nest-predation: active nest defence, nest camouflage and concealment or sheltered nesting. While large and powerful species prefer active nest-defence, swallows and martins usually prefer construction of sheltered nests (LLOYD 2004). The nests of swallows vary from natural cavities in trees and rocks, to self-exca- vated burrows to mud retorts and cups attached to vertical faces. Much attention has been devoted to the importance of controlling for phylogeny in com- parative tests (HARVEY & PAGEL 1991), including molecular phylogenetic studies of swallows (WINKLER & SHELDON 1993). Interactions between the nest-construction va- riability and the clutch size, however, had been ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Reasons Why People Fail to Attract Purple Martins
    Ten Reasons Why People Fail to Attract Purple Martins Over one million North Americans maintain housing for way out in open fields, or next to isolated ponds, rarely lished sites, martins will not recognize, as potential Purple Martins. Unfortunately, only a small percentage of results in successful martin attraction. Martin housing breeding sites, any martin housing with closed holes. these folks successfully attract breeding martins. Below is should be placed in the center of the most open spot A few compartments should be left open on each side a list of the top ten reasons why so many people fail. Your available, about 30’-100’ from human housing. If your of the house. chances of attracting martins will greatly increase if you martin housing hasn’t attracted nesting martins and In contrast, landlords that had breeding martins avoid making these common mistakes. isn’t placed within 100 feet of your house, try moving the previous year can leave their housing completely it closer. closed up, if they choose, until the martins return and 1. Housing placed too close to tall trees or in land on the housing. They can do this because Purple yards that are too enclosed. The main reason people 4. Housing not painted white. Although martins Martins exhibit a very high level of site fidelity — once fail to attract martins is that they place their martin have been known to nest in houses and gourds painted they have bred successfully at a specific location, the housing incorrectly within their yards, or their yards are other colors, white housing seems to attract them best.
    [Show full text]
  • ILLINOIS BIRDS: Hirundinidae
    LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN Y\o. GG - €)3 SURVEY ILLINOIS BIRDS: Hirundinidae RICHARD R. GRABER J^' JEAN W. GRABER ETHELYN L. KIRK ^^^ Biological Notes No. 80 ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY Urbana, Illinois — August, 1972 State of Illinois Department of Registration and Education NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION 1969 -1967 Fig. 1.—Routes travelled in summer (1957-1970) to study breed- ing distribution of the birds of Illinois. The encircled areas were spe- cial study areas where daily censuses of migrants and nesting popula- tions of birds were carried out, 1967-1970. , ILLINOIS BIRDS: Hirundinidae Richard R. Graber, Jean W. Graber, and Ethelyn L. Kirk THIS REPORT, the third in a series of pa- particularly interesting group for distribution studies, pers on the birds of Illinois, deals with the and to determine their population trends we should swallows. The introductions to the first two papers, know the location of every major colony or popula- on the mimids and thrushes (Graber et al. 1970, tion in the state. We therefore appeal to all students 1971) also serve as a general introduction to the of Illinois birds to examine the maps showing breed- series, and the procedures and policies outlined in ing distributions, and publish any additional infor- those papers also apply to this one. mation they may have. By this procedure we will One point that warrants emphasis and clarifica- ultimately learn the true distribution of all the Illi- tion is the geographic scope of the papers. Unless nois species. otherwise indicated, the data presented and the In bringing together the available information statements made refer to the state of Illinois (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Martin Project Our Vision
    New York PurPle Martin Purple Martin P r o j e c t Project New York PHOTO JIM WILLIAMS Female and male parents share in building the nest to raise their young Adult female on the left shown with two of its young IN NEW YORK STATE, PURPLE MARTINS Check out these websites HAVE DECLINED BY 39% since 1985. for more information on purple martins: Help Reverse the Trend! www.friendsofiroquoisnwr.org/ The National Audubon Society suggests the purplemartins/media.html following ways that you can help to conserve newyorkwild.org/martin/martin_video.htm Purple Martins: purplemartin.org ■ Purchase or construct and install appropriate birds.audubon.org/species/purmar martin housing, including predator proofing. Project Partners Housing standards can be found at New York State Ornithological Association www.purplemartin.org Buffalo Audubon Society ■ Protect martin colonies from European Buffalo Ornithological Society Starlings and House Sparrows by trapping or Purple Martin Conservation Association otherwise removing these non-native nest Friends of Iroquois NWR site competitors. New York State Bluebird Society ■ Plant native trees, shrubs, flowers and Orleans Bluebird Society grasses which attract more insects than non- If you have questions about caring for a natives. In fact, they support almost 30 times Purple Martin colony, please contact: more insect diversity than introduced plants. FINWR c/o Carl Zenger ■ Avoid applying pesticides that kill or poison 1101 Casey Road flying insects that martins eat. Basom, NY 14013 Carl Zenger: [email protected] 716-434-7568 ■ Create a dragonfly pond to attract and breed these and other insects preferred by martins. Celeste Morien : [email protected] 585-721-8202 ■ Maintain a pile of small gravel or sand in an Pat Lynch: [email protected] open area for grit.
    [Show full text]
  • Swallows — Family Hirundinidae
    386 Swallows — Family Hirundinidae Swallows — Family Hirundinidae Purple Martin Progne subis A rare and declining summer visitor now restricted almost entirely to the mountains, in California the Purple Martin struggles for survival. Its preferred nest site is specialized: holes in prominent isolated dead trees. It is loosely colonial, several pairs some- times nesting in a single cavity-ridden snag, but in the Southwest it has failed to make the shift to the mul- ticompartment birdhouses that now are its mainstay in the eastern U.S. In our area the European Starling, a more aggressive secondary-cavity nester, has now taken over most of the martin’s nest sites. Even as a migrant the Purple Martin is now very rare here. Photo by Anthony Mercieca Swallows — Family Hirundinidae 387 Breeding distribution: The Purple Martin now nests only on and around San Diego County’s higher mountain ranges, and the birds are few and scattered. On Palomar, they occur not only at the higher elevations but at a few places around the base as well: along Magee Rd. (C11; up to six, with one or two pairs nesting annu- ally in holes in a power pole, J. M. and B. Hargrove), Cutca Trail in Long Canyon (C14/15; one on 16 May 1999; J. M. and B. Hargrove), and near Rincon Junction (F13; four, including at least one pair, 12 June 1999, E. Wallace). Purple Martins are also widely but thinly dis- tributed through the Volcan, Cuyamaca, and Laguna moun- tains. In this area, they may nest downslope as far as Santa Ysabel (J18; five, including fledgling, 17 July 2001, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of Asian House Martin Delichon Dasypus in a High-Elevation Area
    FORKTAIL 28 (2012): 62–66 Breeding biology of Asian House Martin Delichon dasypus in a high-elevation area ZHIXIN ZHOU, YUE SUN, LU DONG, CANWEI XIA, HUW LLOYD & YANYUN ZHANG We present data on the breeding biology of the largest known colony of Asian House Martin Delichon dasypus, located in the Jiangxi Wuyishan Nature Reserve at 2,158 m in the Huanggang Mountains, China. Nest surveys conducted in abandoned buildings in a subalpine meadow during March–August 2007 and 2008 yielded 163 and 132 clutches, from 84 and 82 nests, respectively. Breeding pairs also laid multiple broods and replacement clutches. Average clutch size was 3.0 and 2.6 eggs for first and second broods respectively. Synchronous hatching was detected in 79% of clutches. The proportion of eggs hatching was 0.7 and 0.6 for first and second broods respectively, and the proportion fledging was 0.5 and 0.4 respectively. Nests situated inside buildings were more successful than those situated outside owing to greater protection from severe weather, which was the major cause of breeding failure. Nest losses caused by severe weather were more pronounced later in the breeding season. INTRODUCTION Nest surveys The 3-ha study area is predominately subalpine meadow habitat in Many bird species raise only one brood per year because of a narrow which are situated more than 30 abandoned buildings and garages period of suitable environmental conditions which prohibits that provide suitable nesting substrate for the breeding martins. The multiple breeding attempts (Evans-Ogden & Stutchbury 1996). nest of Asian House Martin is a closed cup typical of hirundines, Others raise multiple broods per breeding season (Verhulst et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Martin
    Purple Martin This rareo species is increasing in numbers due to nest-box programs Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks peratures or heavy rain, for example, gramme at Maplewood Flats in North can mean the onset of nestling Vancouver. The total number of known mortality from starvation. This happens active martin nests in British Columbia because the low temperatures prevent in 1995 was 55. All but two pairs nested Why are Purple Martins insects from flying, with the result that on southern Vancouver Island. All at risk? parent birds cannot forage suc- were in artificial ever abundant in the province, cessfully. nest-boxes. British Columbia’s Purple Martin A natural consequence of “liv- The British The population now maintains a precarious toehold ing on the edge” is that the is currently ex- as a breeding species here. In the Columbia N number of martins tends to fluc- panding from a past, natural nesting sites were in tuate, sometimes dramatically, population of low of just a few snags near fresh or salt water, although since an event that claims even pairs in the early the majority of nesting records have has probably a few victims has a significant ef- 1980s. A nest-box always been from artificial sites. fect on such a small population. never program started Purple Martins adapted to changing Furthermore, population changes in the Cowichan circumstances numbered in Washington will likely Bay estuary at this by adopting spe- have a significant effect in more than a time probably res- cialised nesting By , all British Columbia: increases cued this species niches in har- few hundred known nesting there are likely to cause a from extirpation bour pilings, as spill-over in our province.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Martin Conservation Association
    Purple Martin Conservation Association www.purplemartin.org Tom Ridge Environmental Center (814) 833-7656 (phone) 301 Peninsula Dr., Suite 6 (814) 833-2451 (fax) Erie, PA 16505 The PMCA is an international tax-exempt, non-profit organization. Our major mission is educating martin enthusiasts in the proper techniques for managing this human-dependent species. * 2008 by Purple Martin Conservation Association. All Rights Reserved Purple Martin in Adult Plumage Gourds: the First Birdhouses Ferdinand Zimmerer colony Custer County, Nebraska Taken by Solomon D. Butcher in 1892 Ferdinand Zimmerer colony Adult Male (ASY-After Second Year) Adult Female Adult Female (ASY-After Second Year) Subadult Male (SY-Second Year) Subadult Female (SY-Second Year) But — Before You Put Up Martin Housing • Do you live in the martins’ breeding range? • Do you have a good site location with open flyways? • Are you willing to manage the housing? • Are you insane? Breeding Range • Purple Martins breed in the Northern Hemisphere and winter in the Southern Hemisphere P. s. hesperia P. s. arboricola P. s. subis Choose a Wide Open Location Away from Trees Get involved with Martins Don’t Do It the Hard Way Avoid Unmanageable Housing Choose Manageable Housing Look for housing that: • raises and lowers easily • offers easy access to compartments • has larger cavities (7” wide x 7” tall x 12” deep) with starling-resistant entrances Some Examples of Manageable Housing Any House Can be Modified & Improved Gourds Are a Good Choice Pulley or winch- operated gourd rack Use Gourds
    [Show full text]
  • Swallows Nesting in Nuisance Locations
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Swallows Nesting in Nuisance Locations Cliff swallows present a high degree of intraspecific brood parasitism. Individuals often lay eggs in other individuals’ nests within the same colony. It has been observed that some parasitic swallows have even tossed out their neighbors’ eggs and replaced them with their own offspring. Parasitized swallows had lower success in fledging their own chicks. This behavior has been adapted to increase the parasitic swallow’s offspring’s success by passing on the burden of taking care of chicks to another individual. Solitary Barn swallow at Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge. Tim Ludwick/USFWS There are eight species of swallows that regularly breed in North America: the Bank swallow, Barn swallow, Cave swallow, Cliff swallow, Northern Rough-winged swallow, Purple martin, Tree swallow, and Violet-green swallow. Natural History: After migrating north from their wintering grounds, mostly in Central America, Cliff and Barn swallows often nest on cliffs, canyons, bridges, and eaves of buildings. Swallows may construct an entirely new Cliff swallows constructing their nests at Kern National nest or they may use old nests, building off of traces Wildlife Refuge. Tim Ludwick/USFWS of mud where an old nest used to be. The breeding season for swallows lasts from March through Ecological Value of Swallows: September. They often produce two clutches per Swallows provide us with an ecological service as year, with a clutch size of 3-5 eggs. Eggs incubate insect controllers. They particularly consume between 13-17 days and fledge after 18-24 days. swarming insects such as bees, wasps, flies, However, chicks return to the nest after fledging for damselflies, moths, grasshoppers, crickets, and several weeks before they leave the nest for good.
    [Show full text]
  • BB List 2016V1
    The British Birds list of Western Palearctic Birds Struthionidae Common Ostrich Struthio camelus Anatidae Fulvous Whistling Duck Dendrocygna bicolor Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica Mute Swan Cygnus olor AC2 Black Swan Cygnus atratus Bewick’s Swan Cygnus columbianus A Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus A Bean Goose Anser fabalis A Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhynchus A White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons A Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus A* Greylag Goose Anser anser AC2C4 Snow Goose Anser caerulescens AC2 Ross’s Goose Anser rossii D* Canada Goose Branta canadensis AC2 Cackling Goose Branta hutchinsii Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis AC2 Brent Goose Branta bernicla A Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis A* Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiaca C1 Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea BD* Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna A Spur-winged Goose Plectropterus gambensis Knob-billed Duck Sarkidiornis melanotos Cotton Pygmy-goose Nettapus coromandelianus Wood Duck Aix sponsa Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata C1 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope A American Wigeon Anas americana A Falcated Duck Anas falcata D* Gadwall Anas strepera AC2 Baikal Teal Anas formosa A* Eurasian Teal Anas crecca A Green-winged Teal Anas carolinensis A Cape Teal Anas capensis Mallard Anas platyrhynchos AC2C4 Black Duck Anas rubripes A* Pintail Anas acuta A Red-billed Duck Anas erythrorhyncha Garganey Anas querquedula A Blue-winged Teal Anas discors A* Shoveler Anas clypeata A Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina AC2 Southern Pochard
    [Show full text]