Put the Right Bus in Your Car
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Internationally Standardized As Part of the Train Communication Network (TCN) Applied in Light Rail Vehicles Including Metros, T
September 2012 CANopen on track Consist network applications and subsystems Internationally standardized as part of the train communication network (TCN) Applied in light rail vehicles including metros, trams, and commuter trains www.can-cia.org International standard for CANopen in rail vehicles IEC 61375 standards In June 2012, the international electro technical commission (IEC) has en- hanced the existing and well-established standard for train communication X IEC 61375-1 systems (TCN; IEC 61375), by the CANopen Consist Network. IEC 61375-3-3 Electronic railway equipment - Train VSHFLÀHVWKHGDWDFRPPXQLFDWLRQEDVHGRQ&$1RSHQLQVLGHDVLQJOHUDLO communication network vehicle or a consist in which several rail vehicles share the same vehicle bus. (TCN) - Part 1: General In general, the lower communication layers as well as the application layer are IEC 61375-3-3 IEC architecture based on the well-proven standards for CAN (ISO 11898-1/-2) and CANopen (1 7KLVDOORZVRQWKHRQHKDQGSURÀWLQJIURPWKHDYDLODEOH&$1 X IEC 61375-2-1 Electronic railway WRROVRQWKHPDUNHW2QWKHRWKHUKDQGLWLVSRVVLEOHWREHQHÀWIURPWKHEURDG equipment - Train UDQJHRIDYDLODEOH&$1RSHQSURWRFROVWDFNV&$1RSHQFRQÀJXUDWLRQDQG communication network diagnostic tools as well as off-the-shelf devices (see CANopen product guide (TCN) - Part 2-1: Wire train DWZZZFLDSURGXFWJXLGHVRUJ :HOOGHÀQHGFRPPXQLFDWLRQLQWHUIDFHVZLOO bus (WTB) therefore simplify system design and maintenance. X IEC 61375-2-2 ,QDGGLWLRQWRHQKDQFHGORZHUOD\HUGHÀQLWLRQV VXFKDVHJ&$1,GHQ- Electronic railway WLÀHUIRUPDWW\SHRIFRQQHFWRUGHIDXOWELWUDWHHWF -
Media Oriented Systems Transport” Protocol
TEKA. COMMISSION OF MOTORIZATION AND ENERGETICS IN AGRICULTURE – 2012, Vol. 12, No. 1, 275–279 New elements in vehicle communication “media oriented systems transport” protocol Andrzej Sumorek, Marcin Buczaj Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Poland S u m m a r y. Until recently, no signifi cant breakthroughs two major development trends of communication buses have occurred in the area of functional effi ciency of automo- can be identifi ed. The fi rst of them was to replace the tive vehicle communication protocols. The transmission speed mechanical connection with connections between mul- for “high-speed” communications busses and protocols is still tiple devices using buses (Drive-by-Wire, X-by-Wire) much slower than those of a typical computer network. Neither [14]. The main concern with such a solution is limiting the High-Speed CAN (1 Mbps bandwidth) nor TTP protocol (10 Mbps bandwidth), can be compared to the 1 Gbps band- the failure rate. The second development direction was width that is typical for widely used computer networks. Other to increase the user comfort by integrating multi-media diffi culties are that these vehicle communication networks are subsystems. A simple user interface is frequently imple- nonstandard and frequently use proprietary protocols (e.g., mented to manage complex automotive multimedia sys- communication methods, communication medium and data tems. The integration of various dedicated devices (e.g., formats). In contrast, computer networks have much more ad- telephone, DVD player, MP3 player) into a single system vanced capabilities. They are capable of a range of functions, is diffi cult. -
Benefits of a Standardized Diagnostic Framework
Benefits of a standardized diagnostic framework Hareesh Prakash Development Engineer The copying, distribution and utilization of this document as well as the communication of its contents to other without expressed authorization is prohibited. Offenders will be held liable for the payment of damages. All rights reserved in the event of the grant of a patent, utility model or ornamental design registration. Agenda DiagnosticsDiagnostics withwith standardsstandards –– Motivation Motivation ODXODX –– ODXplorer ODXplorer MCD-3MCD-3 ServerServer –– samMCD3 samMCD3 serverserver MVCI-D-PDU-APIMVCI-D-PDU-API –– HSX HSX samtecsamtec DiagnosticDiagnostic FrameworkFramework The copying, distribution and utilization of this document as well as the communication of its contents to other without expressed authorization is prohibited. ffenders will be held liable for the payment of damages. All rights reserved in the event of the grant of a patent, utility model or ornamental design registration. Diagnostics with Standards Motivation 2000 - 2009 New ACC Stop & Go ALC + Navigation Strategies, Heading Control Night Vision Process, AFS I + II X-AGS 1990 - 1999 Internet Tools, … Telematics Navigation system Online Services CD-Changer Bluetooth Bus system Car Office ACC Adaptive Cruise Control Complexity Local Hazard Warning Complexity 1980 - 1989 Airbags Integrated Safety Systems DSC Dynamic Stability Control Electronic Transmission control Break-By-Wire Adaptive Transmission Control Electronic air conditioning control Steer-By-Wire Anti-roll ASR i-Drive Xenon Lights ABS Fuel cells 1970 - 1979 BMW Assist Telephone LH RDS/TMC 2 Electronic Fuel Injection Seat heating Lane change ssistant Emergency calls Electronic Ignition … Personalization Servotronic Check Control Software Update … Idle speed regulator Force Feedback Pedal Central lock … Costs Source: [2] Hudi; [4] Reichert The copying, distribution and utilization of this document as well as the communication of its contents to other without expressed authorization is prohibited. -
Particulate Matter Emissions from Hybrid Diesel-Electric and Conventional Diesel Transit Buses: Fuel and Aftertreatment Effects
TTitle Page PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM HYBRID DIESEL-ELECTRIC AND CONVENTIONAL DIESEL TRANSIT BUSES: FUEL AND AFTERTREATMENT EFFECTS August 2005 JHR 05-304 Project 03-8 Final Report to Connecticut Transit (CTTRANSIT) and Joint Highway Research Advisory Council (JHRAC) of the Connecticut Cooperative Highway Research Program Britt A. Holmén, Principal Investigator Zhong Chen, Aura C. Davila, Oliver Gao, Derek M. Vikara, Research Assistants Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Connecticut This research was sponsored by the Joint Highway Research Advisory Council (JHRAC) of the University of Connecticut and the Connecticut Department of Transportation and was performed through the Connecticut Transportation Institute of the University of Connecticut. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the University of Connecticut or the Connecticut Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. JHR 05-304 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM HYBRID DIESEL- August 2005 ELECTRIC AND CONVENTIONAL DIESEL TRANSIT BUSES: 6. Performing Organization Code FUEL AND AFTERTREATMENT EFFECTS JH 03-8 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Britt A. Holmén, Zhong Chen, Aura C. Davila, Oliver Gao, Derek M. JHR 05-304 Vikara 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Connecticut N/A Connecticut Transportation Institute 177 Middle Turnpike, U-5202 11. -
Wireless & Self-Powered Internet of Things
Wireless & self-powered Internet of Things The Dolphin products are based on miniaturized energy converters, ultra-low power electronics and robust radio technology in open standards like EnOcean, zigbee and Bluetooth Low Energy for OEM product manufacturers. Building automation Smart home LED lighting M2M Our technology The Dolphin modules and white label products use the energy harvesting principle, in which energy is obtained from the surroundings, to supply self-powered wireless sensor networks. The modules are based on miniaturized energy converters that convert motion, light or temperature differences into electrical energy. Together with an efficient energy management system, the energy harvesting technology facilitates communication between maintenance-free IoT devices based on open wireless standards, such as EnOcean, zigbee and Bluetooth Low Energy. The solutions are used in building automation, smart homes, LED lighting control systems as well as industrial applications. Energy harvesting Wireless Ultra-low power The Dolphin portfolio for OEM product manufacturers The Dolphin portfolio includes the product lines “868 MHz EnOcean” for Europe, “902 MHz EnOcean” for North America and “928 MHz EnOcean” in Japan based on the EnOcean wireless standard introduced by the EnOcean Alliance (ISO/IEC 14543-3-1X) on the sub 1 GHz band, which has proven to be a resounding success in building automation and smart homes. The Dolphin porftolio also includes the “2.4 GHz zigbee” product line in the 2.4 GHz band, which can be used in smart home applications all over the world, and the “2.4 GHz BLE” portfolio for Bluetooth systems for modern lighting control. Energy converter Energy harvesting Energy harvesting Controlers Tools wireless switches wireless sensors Products in 868 MHz EnOcean for Europe Products with 868 MHz are suitable for Europe and other countries adopting RED. -
Comparison of Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth Wireless Technologies Used in Home Automation
Comparison of Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth Wireless Technologies Used in Home Automation Salim Jibrin Danbatta Asaf Varol Department of Software Engineering Department of Software Engineering Firat University Firat University Elazig, Turkey Elazig, Turkey [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— Most of the home automation wireless technologies A literature review is presented in section II, home on the internet of things are based on ZigBee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, automation wireless technologies are discussed in section III. and Bluetooth wireless technologies. While these solutions are The research design is described in section IV while results and good enough, users of smart homes are facing challenges of discussion are presented in section V, and section VI describes selecting the best technology. This paper compares the the conclusions of the study. performance of ZigBee, Z-Wave Wi-Fi and Bluetooth technologies from the user’s perspective. Power consumption, range, cost, ease of use, scalability, and interoperability are the six indices developed as guidelines to potential users, and hence, II. LITERATURE REVIEW the results of this study. With this knowledge, the users can make the appropriate choice of wireless technology solution to use in Several studies about home automation systems have been their home automation systems. done in the past. They include experimental, descriptive, and comparative analysis involving different wired and wireless Keywords—internet of things, home automation, wireless technologies used in Home Automation. technologies, Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth Sikandar et al. [5] show how SMS (short message service) based and wireless technology enhance the controlling of home I. -
UCC 1 USB-CAN CONVERTER Contents
Owner’s Manual UCC 1 USB-CAN CONVERTER Contents 1. Description....................................................................................................................... 17 2. Controls and Connections................................................................................................ 18 3. Installation ....................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Unpacking.................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Rack-Mounting............................................................................................................ 19 4. Initial Operation............................................................................................................... 20 4.1 PC Connection and CAN Driver Installation .............................................................. 20 4.2 Installing IRIS.............................................................................................................. 20 4.3 CAN-Bus Connection.................................................................................................. 20 4.4 ISOLATED / GROUNDED Switch ............................................................................ 22 5. Monitor Bus..................................................................................................................... 23 6. Technical Information.................................................................................................... -
ZIGBEE EXPLOITED the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
08 ZIGBEE EXPLOITED The good, the bad and the ugly Tobias Zillner – August 6th 2015 Cognosec © 2015 | Castellezgasse 16/2 | 1020 Vienna, Austria ZigBee Exploited Version 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 THE ZIGBEE STANDARD .............................................................................................................................. 1 ZIGBEE SECURITY ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Network Layer Security ................................................................................................................................ 2 Application Support Sublayer Security ......................................................................................................... 2 ZIGBEE APPLICATION PROFILES ............................................................................................................... 3 ZigBee Home Automation Public Application Profile (HAPAP) .................................................................... 3 ZigBee Light Link Profile (ZLL) ..................................................................................................................... 4 SECBEE – A NEW ZIGBEE SECURITY -
Field Networking Solutions
Field Networking Solutions Courtesy of Steven Engineering, Inc. ! 230 Ryan Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080-6370 ! Main Office: (650) 588-9200 ! Outside Local Area: (800) 258-9200 ! www.stevenengineering.com TYPES OF FIELDBUS NETWORKS* Field Networking 101 Features and Benefits of Fieldbus Networks The combination of intelligent field devices, digital bus networks, and various open communications protocols Fieldbus networks provide an array of features and benefits that make them an excellent choice is producing extraordinary results at process plants in nearly all process control environments. around the world. Compared to conventional technology, fieldbus networks deliver the following benefits: Just as our ability to retrieve, share, and analyze data Reduced field wiring costs has increased tremendously by use of the Internet and - Two wires from the control room to many devices PC network technology in our homes and at our desk- Reduced commissioning costs tops, so has our ability to control and manage our - Less time and personnel needed to perform process plants improved. Digital connectivity in process I/O wiring checkouts - No time spent calibrating intermediate signals manufacturing plants provides an infrastructure for the (such as 4-20mA signals) - Digital values are delivered directly from field flow of real-time data from the process level, making it devices, increasing accuracy available throughout our enterprise networks. This data Reduced engineering/operating costs is being used at all levels of the enterprise to provide - Much smaller space required for panels, I/O racks, and connectivity boxes increased process monitoring and control, inventory and - Fewer I/O cards and termination panels for materials planning, advanced diagnostics, maintenance control system equipment - Lower power consumption by control system planning, and asset management. -
Maintenance and Decoding of Field Buses
MAINTENANCE AND DECODING OF FIELD BUSES Today, most of the electrical appliances that we use include internal electronics. These circuits often need to communicate via data buses, either with ancillary systems, such Maintenance as remote sensors, or with control systems. This is particularly true in industry, where a single PLC remotely manages multiple sensors and actuators. Formerly, communication with these buses took place via an analogue signal using the “4-20 mA” network. This communication mode had many disadvantages, including Measurements the need for extensive equipment and complex wiring, thus increasing the time required for installation. For this reason, digital communication standards have been developed and are now widely used to avoid these problems. “Fieldbus” is a general term which corresponds to a method of communication between different systems. There are many standards: those specific to manufacturers Analysis and those standardized according to the equipment involved. Here are a few examples of fieldbuses used in different sectors of activity: Diagnostics The example of the automotive sector The new means of intra-system communication have allowed This provides numerous advantages: developments in the systems. The most obvious example is in the • less wiring automotive industry. In this sector, with the development of safety and • lower production costs due to savings on equipment analysis systems such as airbags, anti-lock braking systems (ABS) and • easier maintenance as there is only one communication channel electronic stability programs (ESP), the number of sensors and actuators on vehicles is constantly increasing. Each of these systems could be In addition, performance is improved because the linked directly to the vehicle’s computer via data buses, but this would data are available at all points on the require too much cable. -
LK9893 Developed for Product Code LK7629 - CAN Bus Systems and Operation
Page 1 CAN bus systems and operation Copyright 2009 Matrix Technology Solutions Limited Page 2 Contents CAN bus systems and operation Introduction 3 Overview 5 Building Node A 6 Building Node B 7 Building Node C 8 Building Node D 9 Building the Scan/Fuse Node 10 Wiring It All Up 11 Worksheet 1 - The Startup Routine 12 Worksheet 2 - Seeing the Messages 13 Worksheet 3 - Receiving Messages 15 Worksheet 4 - System Monitoring and ‘Pinging’ 16 Worksheet 5 - System Faults 17 Worksheet 6 - Circuit Faults 19 Worksheet 7 - Fault Diagnosis Using Charts 20 Worksheet 8 - Build Your Own Vehicle! 21 Instructor Guide 22 Scheme of Work 26 Message Code Summary 32 Kvaser Analyser Set Up 33 Programming the MIAC 34 System Graphics 35 About this document: Code: LK9893 Developed for product code LK7629 - CAN bus systems and operation Date Release notes Release version 01 01 2010 First version released LK9893-80-1 revision 1 10 06 2010 MIAC programming notes included LK8392-80-1 revision 2 01 10 2012 Programming notes revised LK9893-80-3 25 09 2013 Warning that some faults require reprogramming LK9893-80-4 22 06 2015 Updated sensing resistors and diagrams LK9893-80-5 13 09 2017 Added to introduction and made less car-specific LK9893-80-6 Copyright 2009 Matrix Technology Solutions Limited Page 3 Introduction CAN bus systems and operation What is this all about? protocol to be used ‘on top’ of the basic CAN The ‘CAN’ in CAN bus stands for ‘Controller Area bus protocol to give additional functionality Network’ and ‘bus’ a bundle of wires. -
Efficiently Triggering, Debugging and Decoding Low-Speed Serial Buses
Efficiently Triggering, Debugging and Decoding Low-Speed Serial Buses Hello, my name is Jerry Mark, I am a Product Marketing Engineer at Tektronix. The following presentation discusses aspects of embedded design techniques for “Efficiently Triggering, Debugging, and Decoding Low-Speed Serial Buses”. 1 Agenda Introduction – Parallel Interconnects – Transition from Parallel to Serial Buses – High-Speed versus Low-Speed Serial Data Buses Low-Speed Serial Data Buses – Challenges – Technology Reviews – Measurement Solutions Summary 2 In this presentation we will begin by taking a glance at the transition from parallel-to-serial data and the challenges this presents to engineers. Then we will briefly review some of the most widely used low-speed serial buses in industry today and some of their key characteristics. We will turn our attention to the key measurements on these buses. Subsequently, we will present by example how the low-speed serial solution from Tektronix addresses these challenges. 2 Parallel Interconnects Traditional way to connect digital devices used parallel buses Advantages – Simple point-to-point connections – All signals are transmitted in parallel, simultaneously – Easy to capture state of bus (if you have enough channels!) – Decoding the bus is relatively easy Disadvantages – Occupies a lot of circuit board space – All high-speed connections must be the same length – Many connections limit reliability – Connectors may be very large 3 Parallel buses present all of the bits in parallel, as shown in the logic analyzer display. A parallel connection between two ICs can be as simple as point-to-point circuit board traces for each of the data lines. If you can physically probe these lines, it is easy to display the bus state on a logic analyzer or mixed signal oscilloscope.