Mauritian Reptiles Mauritian Reptiles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mauritian Reptiles Mauritian Reptiles Reptile conservation in Mauritius: Reptile conservation in Mauritius: Restoring island biodiversity IslandRestoring Biodiversity island biodiversity & Extinction • TheIslandsIsolated isolation, and animals reptile uniqueness and extinction plants, and such dependency as those thatof island • Mauritius:speciesnaturally upon colonise An islandone anotherislands, of unique makesoften reptiles co-evolve them vulnerable and adapt to • Theextinctionto utilise need all for available reptile conservation resources and translocation • SinceThisRe-building drives the 17 speciationendemicth Century reptile and75% theof communities all formation animal extinctions of unique • haveTheecosystems future been islandfor Mauritian endemics reptiles • Islands therefore maintain some of the richest biodiversity in the World Nik Cole Island Biodiversity & Extinction Mauritian reptiles • Although the Mascarenes have lost more species • OfAlthoughTherePreventing the have28 reptilethe furtherbeen loss extinctions more ofloss species reptile of reptile over is extinctions relatively species,the past few,in400 the years,the than anywhere else, Mauritius still maintains one of allcurrentMascarenesparticularly but one loss have island ofthan reptile occurred anywhere endemics, diversity on else islandsis istherefore occurring of atgreat an the richest reptile diversities in the World alarmingimportance rate in and maintaining considered global as a biodiversity GLOBAL CRISIS! Fiji Africa Extinct MauritianNew Zealand Giant Tortoise Cylindraspis inepta Canary Islands Seychelles12 Extinct Giant Mauritian Skink CapeLeiolopisma Verde Islands mauritiana 10 8 6 4 Caribbean Mascarenes 2 ? Reptile extinction events 0 1600- 1700- 1800- 1900- 2000- 1699 1799 1899 1999 2099 Mauritian reptiles the formation of an ecosystem with: • TheThisBefore reptiles allowed the arrival and an adaptivebirds of man, therefore radiation some 400filled of years all the ago, roles there in • REPTILIAN PREYPREDATORSHERBIVORESSEED forDISPERSERS other oflarger birds, reptiles &reptiles POLLINATORS and and birds invertebrates thewere ecosystem no mammals usually in Mauritius occupied accept by mammals for bats allowingmaintaining habitat the natural regeneration habitat through browsing & grazing Giant tortoises Geckos Skinks Snakes 1 A MauritianUnfortunately ecosystem that Extensive destruction of was dependent upon reptiles natural habitat • A system rarely seen anywhere else The arrival of people in Mauritius has led to the near destruction of much of this unique ecosystem IntroductionExtensive destruction of numerous of These disturbances caused non-nativenatural habitat species • The loss of more than 60% of the unique reptile species from the mainland Reptilian predators and competitors Reptilian predators and competitors Mammalian predators Mammalian predators The offshore islands TheRound offshore Island islands • DisturbanceManyBut as reptile island tospecies use the increased, offshore lost from islands disturbance the mainland occurred increased: continued at a • RemoteBut as island and relatively use increased, difficult disturbance to access increased: slowerto– surviveRemaining rate on reptile the islands populations declined – Remaining reptile populations declined rats and other introduced predators responsible for – Many island populations disappeared = further extinction – Many island populations disappeared = further extinction reptile extinction never reached the island – But some of the more remote and least disturbed island – But some of the more remote and least disturbed island populations continued to persist populations continued to persist – For example: – For example: 2 Round Island The need for conservation • 30 years ago it was recognised that: • andTheBecame theisland last the also locationlast supports location where onhealthy the Earth burrowing populations to find: boa, of other Bolyeriaendemic multocarinataand native reptilewas species seen in 1975 KeeledGunthers scaled gecko, boa, Phelsuma Casarea dussumieriguentheri Ornate day gecko, Phelsuma ornata Bojer’s skink, Gongylomorphus bojerii HOME TO THE LAST SEMI-INTACT REPTILE COMMUNITY TheTo safeguardRoundTheIntroduced future Island againstsurvival goatsreptile further ofand community this rabbits disturbance reptile WITHIN THE MASCARENES andwasthatdominated ultimately uniquewere destroying andecosystem reptile extremely extinction the was reptiles’ important at great populations habitat risk Durrell’sTelfairs nightskink,Bouton’s gecko, Leiolopisma skink, Nactus telfairii durrelli shouldfor thebe re-establishedbiodiversityhad to be removedof backthe region to other islands Cryptoblepharus boutonii Bullock & North 1975 The need for conservation The need for conservation • But…Most of 30 the years populations ago little werewas knowntoo vulnerable about: • ThereThisTheseIslandLittleOver researchwasthe hasrestorationactions past known been threehashave extensive about anddemonstrated decadesbeen reptile the the researchother theresearchbackbone Forestrytheislands into need is to reptilenow Service, forisland there- establishingecology,restorationfoundationDWCT,– was there conservation, MWF tosuitable island whatand captiv NPCS habitat?reptilewase suggested husbandry, thecommunities driving genetics, 30 force: years taxonomy, ago: health and disease, and past and present distributions – RestoreRoundwereHabitat other Islandrestorationmissing vulnerable reptile ecological populations reptiles processes present? have and increased island biodiversity TRANSLOCATION – EnhancedramaticallywereEradication exotic the ofpredators/competitorslong-term mammalian survival predators of endangered present? and herbivores reptiles – Some islands now suitable for reptile re-establishment TheThere reptiles’ were not pastecologicaltaxonomydistribution sufficient co-existence requirements numbers to remove and re-establish elsewhere The needTranslocation for conservation Translocation • TheIsland movement restoration of anda species reptile from research one location is now the with • Re-introductionThe two most importantand re-stocking initial stepsare common are: freefoundation release to in what another was –suggested 3 types: 30 years ago: and1) Determinepowerful and conservation remove the causes tools of initial species loss – Introduction: species release outside its natural range 2) Determine the ecological requirements of the species – Re-introduction:TRANSLOCATION species release within its past former range • However, some question the validity of this tool – Re-stocking: species release within an existing population • forIt reptiles,is also essential because that success post-translocation and impact has beenmonitoring poorly documented! is conducted to assess – success of establishing a new population • The– theInternational impact to the resident Union species for the Conservation of Nature– the need and for Natural further action Resources – restocking(IUCN) have set guidelines for species translocation 3 Re-building reptile communities Re-building reptile communities • In 2006 (Darwin Initiative funding) we initiated the • Telfair’s skink Leiolopisma telfairii first reptile translocations in the Indian Ocean – Restricted to Round Island, but once widespread – Dec 06 to Feb 07 – The mainland and other island populations destroyed by • It was essential that we chose species based on – rats250260 skinks to IleGunners aux Aigrettes Quoin – needsuitability for conservation of potential islands: action “vulnerability to extinction” – Re-establishing this skink back to other islands – current• suitable stability habitat within the donor populations represents an important step in restoring island ecosystems – knowledge• food availability of their ecology and role in the ecosystem • lack of introduced predators – As we are reinstating a lost predator, seed disperser, • stable populations of resident endemic species pollinator and potential prey item • Four reptile species and four islands were selected: Re-building reptile communities Re-building reptile communities • Ilot Vacoas Bojer’s Skink, Gongylomorphus bojerii sp. – Restricted to Ilot Vacoas, only 1ha! • Night geckosgeckos, Nactus spp. – 400 skinks inhabit the island – AJan sub-species 07 to the Bojer’s restricted to the N islands – 20 skinks to Ile aux Fouquets • Nactus– These small coindemirensis geckos were once widespread and possibly the most abundant vertebrates in pristine Mauritius – Underwent catastrophic reduction in range following the introduction of the house gecko, Hemidactylus frenatus – Once widespread in the SE – IncludingThis is the the first neighbouring of several annual islands translocations until the 1930s from & 70sIlot – TheseVacoas island to Ile populationsaux Fouquets predated • Nactus durrelli by shrews and elsewhere by wolf snakes Re-building reptile communities Re-building reptile communities • Nactus coindemirensisonly survive on restrictedislands where to: the house • Nactus durrelli restricted to Round Island gecko• Ilot has Vacoas not reached Pigeon Rock • Both night geckos are now segregated from one Flat Island Round • Gunners Quoin another Island Gunners Quoin • A small area of rock on Flat Island • Translocation is limited, because of house gecko • Pigeon Rock distribution • Beneficial to translocate both night geckos to the same island • But could we successfully translocate both night geckos to the same island at the same time? Ilot Vacoas 4 Re-building reptile communities Re-building reptile communities • OctIlot
Recommended publications
  • A New Species of <I>Leiolopisma</I> (Lacertilia: Scincidae) from Western
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Greer, Allen E., 1982. A new species of Leiolopisma (Lacertilia: Scincidae) from Western Australia. Records of the Australian Museum 34(12): 549–573. [31 December 1982]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.34.1982.242 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia A NEW SPECIES OF LElOLOPISMA (LACERTILlA: SCINClDAE) FROM WESTERN AUSTRALIA, WITH NOTES ON THE BIOLOGY AND RELATIONSHIPS OF OTHER AUSTRALIAN SPECIES ALLEN E. GREER The Australian Museum, Sydney SUMMARY Lei%pisma baudini n. sp. is described on the basis of a single specimen from the vicinity of Point Culver, Western Australia. The new species is quite distinct and relatively primitive. Its dosest living relative appears to be L. entrecasteauxij from southeastern Australia. Brief notes are provided on certain aspects of habitat, female reproduction and colour hues of most of the mainland Australian and Tasmanian species of Lei%pisma, and these data are used to support Rawlinson's (1974b and 1975) suggestion that the Australian species of the genus, at least, form two subgroups. A key is also provided to the described species of Lei%pisma from mainland Australia and Tasmania. INTRODUCTION During the course of a botanical survey in the area just west of Point Culver, Western Australia in October 1973, Mr Michael J. Brooker collected a number of reptiles which were subsequently lodged in the Western Australian Museum, Perth.
    [Show full text]
  • 93 REPTILES of the ALDERMEN ISLANDS By
    93 REPTILES OF THE ALDERMEN ISLANDS by D.R. Towns* and B.W. Haywardt SUMMARY Six species of reptile are recorded from the Aldermen Islands after a visit to all of the islands in the group in May, 1972. They are: the geckos Hoplodactylus pacificus and H, duvauceli; the skinks Leiolopisma oliveri, L. smithi and L. suteri, and the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus. No reptiles were found on Middle, Half and Hernia Islands but they were abundant on the three largest rat-free islands (Ruamahua-iti, Ruamahua-nui and Hongiora). INTRODUCTION One of us (B.W.H.) collected and noted reptiles seen on the islands during a visit in May, 1972, whilst the senior author (D.R.T.) identified specimens and commented on their occurrence and taxonomy. The party was based on Ruamahua-iti (Fig. I.) and consequently the most detailed collection and observation was made on this island. Two day-trips were made to Middle Island, and one day visits to each of Hongiora, Ruamahua-nui, Half and Hernia Islands were also made. PREVIOUS WORK In 1843, Rev. Wade was shipwrecked on Ruamahua-iti. He commented on the "iguana-like lizards" (no doubt tuataras), and since then there has only been one published report of reptiles on these islands. This was included in a survey by Sladden and Falla (1928), who recorded a skink species {"Lygosoma Smithii"), geckos ("Dactylocnemis" sp.) and tuataras (Sphenodon punctatus). Over the past twenty-five years a number of parties of Internal Affairs Dept. Officers have visited the group and recorded tuataras seen, though no specific study of the reptiles has been attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroduction of the Telfair's Skink to Gunner's Quoin, Mauritius
    The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or any of the funding organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by: IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group & Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi Copyright: © 2018 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Soorae, P. S. (ed.) (2018). Global Reintroduction Perspectives: 2018. Case studies from around the globe. IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland and Environment Agency, Abu Dhabi, UAE. xiv + 286pp. 6th Edition ISBN: 978-2-8317-1901-6 (PDF) 978-2-8317-1902-3 (print edition) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.08.en Cover photo: Clockwise starting from top-left: I. Reticulated python, Singapore © ACRES II. Trout cod, Australia © Gunther Schmida (Murray-Darling Basin Authority) III. Yellow-spotted mountain newt, Iran © M. Sharifi IV. Scimitar-horned oryx, Chad © Justin Chuven V. Oregon silverspot butterfly, USA © U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service VI. Two-colored cymbidium orchid, Singapore © Tim Wing Yam VII. Mauritius fody, Mauritius © Jacques de Spéville Cover design & layout by: Pritpal S.
    [Show full text]
  • Brongniart, 1800) in the Paris Natural History Museum
    Zootaxa 4138 (2): 381–391 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4138.2.10 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:683BD945-FE55-4616-B18A-33F05B2FDD30 Rediscovery of the 220-year-old holotype of the Banded Iguana, Brachylophus fasciatus (Brongniart, 1800) in the Paris Natural History Museum IVAN INEICH1 & ROBERT N. FISHER2 1Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, UMR 7205 (CNRS, EPHE, MNHN, UPMC; ISyEB: Institut de Systéma- tique, Évolution et Biodiversité), CP 30 (Reptiles), 25 rue Cuvier, F-75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] 2U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station, 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101-0812, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Paris Natural History Museum herpetological collection (MNHN-RA) has seven historical specimens of Brachylo- phus spp. collected late in the 18th and early in the 19th centuries. Brachylophus fasciatus was described in 1800 by Brongniart but its type was subsequently considered as lost and never present in MNHN-RA collections. We found that 220 year old holotype among existing collections, registered without any data, and we show that it was donated to MNHN- RA from Brongniart’s private collection after his death in 1847. It was registered in the catalogue of 1851 but without any data or reference to its type status. According to the coloration (uncommon midbody saddle-like dorsal banding pattern) and morphometric data given in its original description and in the subsequent examination of the type in 1802 by Daudin and in 1805 by Brongniart we found that lost holotype in the collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Emoia Impar and Emoia Cyanura)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902866; this version posted January 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. SIZE-BASED DOMINANCE HIERARCHY IN ONE OF TWO SYMPATRIC CRYPTIC PACIFIC SKINKS (EMOIA IMPAR AND EMOIA CYANURA) MARY “MOLLY” HALLSTEN Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA Abstract. Emoia impar and Emoia cyanura are two morphologically cryptic Pacific skinks that have different preferred thermal micro-habitats but similar geographic range and overlap. Previously individuals have been noted to display a size-based dominance hierarchy at favored basking sites, though this behavior was not specified between species. I found that only one of the two species, E. impar, naturally presents this size-based dominance hierarchy in areas of high population density. Neither species exhibit the hierarchy in low population density areas. No evidence was found to suggest that the presence of this hierarchy allows one species to exclude the other. Key words: skinks; Emoia; thermal resource partitioning; Moorea, French Polynesia; size- based dominance hierarchy INTRODUCTION Understanding how multiple species co- exist within a shared habitat is a fundamental challenge in ecology (Gause 1934). Hardin (1960) documented the competitive exclusion principle, which states that if two non- interbreeding populations occupy the same ecological niche and geographical territory, and differ in their rate of resource consumption, one species will eventually drive the other to extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Ecology of Petrels
    M o le c u la r e c o lo g y o f p e tr e ls (P te r o d r o m a sp p .) fr o m th e In d ia n O c e a n a n d N E A tla n tic , a n d im p lic a tio n s fo r th e ir c o n se r v a tio n m a n a g e m e n t. R u th M a rg a re t B ro w n A th e sis p re se n te d fo r th e d e g re e o f D o c to r o f P h ilo so p h y . S c h o o l o f B io lo g ic a l a n d C h e m ic a l S c ie n c e s, Q u e e n M a ry , U n iv e rsity o f L o n d o n . a n d In stitu te o f Z o o lo g y , Z o o lo g ic a l S o c ie ty o f L o n d o n . A u g u st 2 0 0 8 Statement of Originality I certify that this thesis, and the research to which it refers, are the product of my own work, and that any ideas or quotations from the work of other people, published or otherwise, are fully acknowledged in accordance with the standard referencing practices of the discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Complete Work
    © The Authors, 2015. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2015 Records of the Australian Museum (2015) Vol. 67, issue number 7, pp. 207–224. ISSN 0067-1975 (print), ISSN 2201-4349 (online) http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.67.2015.1649 Taxonomic Resolution to the Problem of Polyphyly in the New Caledonian Scincid Lizard Genus Lioscincus (Squamata: Scincidae) ROSS A. SADLIER1*, AarON M. BAUER2, GLENN M. SHEA3,1 AND SaraH A. SMITH1 1 Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia 2 Department of Biology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, United States of America 3 Faculty of Veterinary Science B01, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia ABSTRACT. Recent genetic studies have identified the New Caledonian scincid genus Lioscincus to be polyphyletic, comprising four distinct evolutionary lineages which we recognize at the generic level. The revised concept of Lioscincus s.s. now includes only the type species Lioscincus steindachneri Bocage, 1873 and the recently described Lioscincus vivae Sadlier, Bauer, Whitaker & Smith, 2004. The three remaining lineages identified are:Leiolopisma tillieri Ineich & Sadlier, 1991 and Lioscincus maruia Sadlier, Whitaker & Bauer, 1998 for which the genus Phasmasaurus gen. nov. is proposed; Lygosoma (Mocoa) nigrofasciolatus Peters, 1869 and Leiolopisma greeri Böhme, 1979 for which the genus Epibator gen. nov. is proposed; and Lygosoma (Leiolopisma) novaecaledoniae Parker, 1926 for which the genus Caesoris gen. nov. is proposed. Each of these genera is diagnosed by a suite of morphological apomorphies which in combination is unique within the Eugongylus group of skinks of which each is a member.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles of Ngulu Atoll, Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia1
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Reptiles of Ngulu Atoll, Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia1 Donald W. Buden2 Abstract: Fourteen species of reptiles (two sea turtles, six geckos, six skinks) are recorded from Ngulu Atoll, Yap, Micronesia, all but the turtles for the first time. None is endemic and most occur widely in Oceania; the phylogenetic status of an undescribed species of Lepidodactylus is undetermined, and a phenotypically male Nactus cf. pelagicus is recorded from Micronesia for the first time. Lepido- dactylus moestus is the most common gecko on Ngulu Island, and Emoia caeruleo- cauda, E. impar, and E. jakati are the most abundant skinks. The islands are an important nesting site for green turtles, Chelonia mydas. Isolation, a small resi- dent human population, and traditional conservation practices contribute to sustaining turtle populations, although occasional poaching by outside visitors persists. The report of a small snake on Ylangchel Island, possibly a species of Ramphotyphlops, requires confirmation. Many of the west-central Pacific islands distribution and relative abundance of the composing Micronesia are poorly known bio- reptiles of Ngulu, and it is based largely on logically, especially the numerous, small, low- my personal observations and specimens that lying, and faunistically impoverished coralline I collected during approximately a month- atolls. These islands are difficult to reach. long field study, mainly on Ngulu Island, Those that have been studied appear to be in- and with brief visits to adjacent Ylangchel habited largely by widespread, weedy species and Wachlug islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Anfibios Y Reptiles Extinguidos. Herpetofauna Desaparecida Desde El Año 1500
    3 Los anfibios y reptiles extinguidos. Herpetofauna desaparecida desde el año 1500 Pedro Galán Regalado A Coruña 2015 Universidade da Coruña Servizo de Publicacións 4 Los anfibios y reptiles extinguidos. Herpetofauna desaparecida desde el año 1500 GALÁN REGALADO, Pedro A Coruña, 2015 Universidade da Coruña, Servizo de Publicacións Monografías, n.º 155 Nº de páxinas: 512 17x24 cm. Índice: páx. 7-14 ISBN: 978-84-9749-629-2 Depósito legal: C 2309-2015 CDU: (597.6+598.1) “1500/…” | 504 “1500/…” IBIC: PSVW3 | PSVW5 | RNKH1 | 3J EDICIÓN Universidade da Coruña, Servizo de Publicacións (http://www.udc.gal/publicacions) © Universidade da Coruña Esta obra foi revisada e avaliada por dous expertos non pertencentes á UDC DISTribuciÓN Galicia: • Consorcio Editorial Galego. Av. da Estación 25, 36812 Redondela (Pontevedra) [email protected] España e internacional: • Logística Libromares, S.L. C/ Matilde Hernández 34, 28019 Madrid (España) [email protected] • Pórtico Librerías. C/ Muñoz Seca 6, 50005 Zaragoza (España) distribució[email protected] DESEÑO DA CUBERTA: Julia Núñez Calo IMAXE DA CUBERTA: Dibujo de Pedro Galán Regalado. Atelopus ignescens, anfibio andino considerado extinguido y redescubierto. Motivo de esperanza de nuevos redescubrimientos. IMPRIME: Rodi Artes Gráficas S.L. Reservados todos os dereitos. Nin a totalidade nin parte deste libro pode reproducirse ou transmitirse por ningún procedemento electrónico ou mecánico, incluíndo fotocopia, gravación magnética ou calquera almacenamento de información e sistema de recuperación,
    [Show full text]
  • F3999f15-C572-46Ad-Bbbe
    THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (CHAPTER 92A) (Original Enactment: Act 5 of 2006) REVISED EDITION 2008 (1st January 2008) Prepared and Published by THE LAW REVISION COMMISSION UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS ACT (CHAPTER 275) Informal Consolidation – version in force from 22/6/2021 CHAPTER 92A 2008 Ed. Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Appointment of Director-General and authorised officers PART II CONTROL OF IMPORT, EXPORT, ETC., OF SCHEDULED SPECIES 4. Restriction on import, export, etc., of scheduled species 5. Control of scheduled species in transit 6. Defence to offence under section 4 or 5 7. Issue of permit 8. Cancellation of permit PART III ENFORCEMENT POWERS AND PROCEEDINGS 9. Power of inspection 10. Power to investigate and require information 11. Power of entry, search and seizure 12. Powers ancillary to inspections and searches 13. Power to require scheduled species to be marked, etc. 14. Power of arrest 15. Forfeiture 16. Obstruction 17. Penalty for false declarations, etc. 18. General penalty 19. Abetment of offences 20. Offences by bodies corporate, etc. 1 Informal Consolidation – version in force from 22/6/2021 Endangered Species (Import and 2008 Ed. Export) CAP. 92A 2 PART IV MISCELLANEOUS Section 21. Advisory Committee 22. Fees, etc., payable to Board 23. Board not liable for damage caused to goods or property as result of search, etc. 24. Jurisdiction of court, etc. 25. Composition of offences 26. Exemption 27. Service of documents 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of Australia 2A
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 26. BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE SQUAMATA Mark N. Hutchinson & Stephen C. Donnellan 26. BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE SQUAMATA This review summarises the current hypotheses of the origin, antiquity and history of the order Squamata, the dominant living reptile group which comprises the lizards, snakes and worm-lizards. The primary concern here is with the broad relationships and origins of the major taxa rather than with local distributional or phylogenetic patterns within Australia. In our review of the phylogenetic hypotheses, where possible we refer principally to data sets that have been analysed by cladistic methods. Analyses based on anatomical morphological data sets are integrated with the results of karyotypic and biochemical data sets. A persistent theme of this chapter is that for most families there are few cladistically analysed morphological data, and karyotypic or biochemical data sets are limited or unavailable. Biogeographic study, especially historical biogeography, cannot proceed unless both phylogenetic data are available for the taxa and geological data are available for the physical environment. Again, the reader will find that geological data are very uncertain regarding the degree and timing of the isolation of the Australian continent from Asia and Antarctica. In most cases, therefore, conclusions should be regarded very cautiously. The number of squamate families in Australia is low. Five of approximately fifteen lizard families and five or six of eleven snake families occur in the region; amphisbaenians are absent. Opinions vary concerning the actual number of families recognised in the Australian fauna, depending on whether the Pygopodidae are regarded as distinct from the Gekkonidae, and whether sea snakes, Hydrophiidae and Laticaudidae, are recognised as separate from the Elapidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Record of the 26Th Meeting of the Animals Committee
    Original language: English AC26 summary record CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Twenty-sixth meeting of the Animals Committee Geneva (Switzerland), 15-20 March 2012 and Dublin (Ireland), 22-24 March 2012 SUMMARY RECORD Animals Committee matters 1. Opening of the meeting The Chair opened the meeting and welcomed all participants, before giving the floor to the Secretary- General, who also welcomed everyone and introduced new members of the Secretariat's scientific team (Mr De Meulenaer and Ms Kwitsinskaia) and enforcement team (Ms Garcia Ferreira, Ms Jonsson and Mr van Rensburg). He wished the Committee well in its deliberations. The Chair thanked the Secretary-General and invited suggestions as to how the Conference of the Parties could establish stronger measures to support the Committee as well as export countries, which deserved particular assistance. No other intervention was made during discussion of this item.1 2. Rules of Procedure The Secretariat introduced document AC26 Doc. 2 and proposed amending Rule 22 as follows: “On request, the Secretariat shall distribute printed and translated documents...”. The Secretariat explained that most members regularly indicated that they did not need printed copies and that this proposal was made to reduce costs. Although not opposed to the change in principle, a Party regretted that the suggestion had not been presented in the document, which would have given Parties time to consider it, and was concerned that this unannounced proposal might create a precedent. Another Party asked a question on the procedure to accept observers, but the Chair invited it to raise this topic under agenda item 4 on Admission of observers.
    [Show full text]