Brooding Behaviour in Ophioderma Wahlbergii, a Shallow-Water Brittle Star from South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Brooding Behaviour in Ophioderma Wahlbergii, a Shallow-Water Brittle Star from South Africa 15th August 14 Brooding behaviour in Ophioderma wahlbergii, a shallow-water brittle star from South Africa Minor DissertationUniversity presented in partial of Cape fulfilment Town of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town By Jannes Landschoff Supervisor Professor Charles Griffiths The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Title image: 3D animated brooding Ophioderma wahlbergii from the µCT scan data in Chapter 3, arms cut off. Rendered image is a courtesy of Henry Weber, Volume Graphics GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany. PLAGIARISM DECLARATION I know the meaning of plagiarism and declare that all of the work in the dissertation, save for that which is properly acknowledged, is my own. Date, Signature TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1. REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS IN THE CLASS OPHIUROIDEA: A LITERATURE REVIEW ................ 5 1. Ophiuroid divErsity and distribution ............................................................................................ 5 2. Body structurE ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. General external characters ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Internal anatomy .............................................................................................................................................. 6 3. Biology ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. REproductivE biology .......................................................................................................................... 9 4.1. Asexual reproduction ..................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Sexual reproduction ........................................................................................................................................ 9 4.2.1. Bursae and sexual organs ...................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.2. Structure and number of gonads ...................................................................................................................... 10 4.2.3. Colour of gonads ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2.4. Sperms and oocytes ................................................................................................................................................ 11 4.2.5. Reproductive and spawning behaviour ......................................................................................................... 13 4.2.5.1. Pseudocopulation .......................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2.5.2. Spawning ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2.5.3. Behaviour of brooding species ................................................................................................................. 14 4.2.6. Spawning and reproductive cycles .................................................................................................................. 15 4.2.6.1. Seasonality and climate ............................................................................................................................... 15 4.2.6.2. Predictability ................................................................................................................................................... 16 5. DEvElopmEnt ........................................................................................................................................ 17 5.1. Developmental modes ................................................................................................................................ 17 5.1.1. Classification with more than three developmental modes ................................................................. 18 5.1.2. Classification with three developmental modes ........................................................................................ 19 5.1.1.1. Planktotrophic developing larvae .......................................................................................................... 20 5.1.1.2. Larvae with abbreviated development ................................................................................................ 21 5.1.1.3. Larvae with direct development ............................................................................................................. 23 6. Brooding ................................................................................................................................................ 24 6.1. Vivipary vs. brooding ................................................................................................................................... 24 6.2. External brooding .......................................................................................................................................... 24 6.3. Babysitting brittle stars? ............................................................................................................................ 25 6.4. Internal brooding .......................................................................................................................................... 25 6.4.1. Embryonic nutrition .............................................................................................................................................. 26 6.4.2. Size of brooded young ........................................................................................................................................... 27 6.4.3. Brooding cycles ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 6.4.4. Number of brooded young .................................................................................................................................. 28 6.4.5. Duration of brooding ............................................................................................................................................. 29 7. Brooding and Evolutionary aspects ............................................................................................. 29 7.1. Larval mortality and parental care ........................................................................................................ 29 7.2. Adult size and hermaphroditism ............................................................................................................ 30 7.3. Brooding – a reproduction strategy in cold waters? ...................................................................... 31 8. Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 2.REPRODUCTION IN THE BROODING BRITTLE STAR OPHIODERMA WAHLBERGII MÜLLER & TROSCHEL, 1842 .................................................................................................................... 33 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 33 2. MEthods ................................................................................................................................................. 35 2.1. Sampling and study site ............................................................................................................................. 35 2.2. Morphological examinations ................................................................................................................... 35 2.3. Data analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 36 2.3.1. Gonads, sex ratio and egg size ........................................................................................................................... 36 2.3.2. Embryos per female and seasonality .............................................................................................................. 37 2.3.3. Developmental stages of brooded embryos ................................................................................................ 37 2.4. Imaging and photography .........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ophioderma Peruana, a New Species of Brittlestar
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 357: 53–65 (2013) Ophioderma peruana, a new species of brittlestar... 53 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.357.6176 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Ophioderma peruana, a new species of brittlestar (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea, Ophiodermatidae) from the Peruvian coast Tania Pineda-Enríquez1,†, Francisco A. Solís-Marín1,‡, Yuri Hooker2,§, Alfredo Laguarda-Figueras1,| 1 Colección Nacional de Equinodermos “M. Elena Caso M.”, Laboratorio de Sistemática y Ecología de Equinodermos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria s/n Deleg. Coyoacán CP 04510 México 2 Laboratorio de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Caytano Heredia, Av. Honorio Delgado 430, Urb. Ingeniería, S.M.P. Lima, Perú † http://zoobank.org/29C721AC-5981-485C-B257-C496113060EA ‡ http://zoobank.org/A2417F0D-CA2A-4BE2-A6F0-C8991F4B90EA § http://zoobank.org/094F1EA7-A5E6-4625-B36A-898EA2F93AC2 | http://zoobank.org/D8F6D077-9DA7-4BDB-B7BA-73009E7EE032 Corresponding author: Tania Pineda-Enríquez ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yves Samyn | Received 2 September 2013 | Accepted 11 November 2013 | Published 2 December 2013 http://zoobank.org/6455E2A2-D412-4DEF-816A-A49410923991 Citation: Pineda-Enríquez T, Solís-Marín FA, Hooker Y, Laguarda-Figueras A (2013) Ophioderma peruana, a new species of brittlestar (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea, Ophiodermatidae) from the Peruvian coast. ZooKeys 357: 53–65. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.357.6176 Abstract Ophioderma peruana sp. n. is a new species of Ophiodermatidae, extending the distribution of the genus Ophioderma to Lobos de Afuera Island, Peru, easily distinguishable from its congeners by its peculiarly fragmented dorsal arm plates.
    [Show full text]
  • BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSE of NORTHERN BASKET STAR GORGONOCEPHALUS ARCTICUS to MECHANICAL STIMULATIONS J.-F Hamel, a Mercier
    BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSE OF NORTHERN BASKET STAR GORGONOCEPHALUS ARCTICUS TO MECHANICAL STIMULATIONS J.-F Hamel, A Mercier To cite this version: J.-F Hamel, A Mercier. BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSE OF NORTHERN BASKET STAR GOR- GONOCEPHALUS ARCTICUS TO MECHANICAL STIMULATIONS. Vie et Milieu / Life & En- vironment, Observatoire Océanologique - Laboratoire Arago, 1993, pp.197-203. hal-03045834 HAL Id: hal-03045834 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03045834 Submitted on 8 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. VIE MILIEU, 1993, 43 (4): 197-203 BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSE OF NORTHERN BASKET STAR GORGONOCEPHALUS ARCTICUS TO MECHANICAL STIMULATIONS J.-F. HAMEL and A. MERCIER Département d'océanographie, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Centre Océanographique de Rimouski, 310 allée des Ursulines, Rimouski (Québec), Canada G5L 3A1 GORGONOCEPHALUS RÉSUME - L'Ophiure ramifiée Gorgonocephalus arcticus, retrouvée dans les eaux OPHIURE profondes de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent, montre une capacité de discrimination COMPORTEMENT tactile qui lui permet de répondre proportionnellement à diverses intensités de sti- MECANO-SENSIBILITE mulation. Une stimulation ponctuelle du disque provoque l'enroulement général des bras et la couverture du disque par les radii. Une comparaison de la vitesse du mouvement des bras, induite par différents niveaux de stimulation, montre que G.
    [Show full text]
  • Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea)
    Mar Biol (2007) 151:85–97 DOI 10.1007/s00227-006-0470-6 RESEARCH ARTICLE Uncommon diversity in developmental mode and larval form in the genus Macrophiothrix (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) Jonathan D. Allen · Robert D. Podolsky Received: 18 March 2005 / Accepted: 10 August 2006 / Published online: 15 September 2006 © Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract Development mode in the ophiuroid genus lecithotrophs have simpliWed larval morphologies with Macrophiothrix includes an unusual diversity of plank- only a single pair of full length (Macrophiothrix nerei- tonic larval forms and feeding types. The modes of dina Lamarck) or highly reduced (Macrophiothrix belli development for seven congeners that coexist in coral Doderlein) larval arms and no functional mouth or gut. reef habitats at Lizard Island, Australia were com- This genus includes the Wrst example of facultative pared using larvae generated from crosses over several planktotrophy in ophiuroids, the Wrst example in echi- reproductive seasons from 1999 to 2003. Three species noderms of a complete pluteus morphology retained (Macrophiothrix koehleri Clark, Macrophiothrix longi- by a lecithotrophic larva, and three degrees of morpho- peda Lamarck, Macrophiothrix lorioli Clark) develop logical simpliWcation among lecithotrophic larval from small eggs (<170 m) into typical obligately feed- forms. Egg volume varies 20-fold among species and is ing planktonic (planktotrophic) pluteus larvae with related to variation in feeding mode, larval form, and four larval arm pairs. The remaining four species development time, as predicted for the transition from develop from larger eggs (¸230 m) into either faculta- planktotrophic to lecithotrophic development. tively-feeding or non-feeding (lecithotrophic) larval forms. The facultative planktotroph (Macrophiothrix rhabdota Clark) retains the ability to digest and beneWt Introduction from food but does not require particulate food to complete metamorphosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlin Marine Information Network Information on the Species and Habitats Around the Coasts and Sea of the British Isles
    MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Ophiothrix fragilis and/or Ophiocomina nigra brittlestar beds on sublittoral mixed sediment MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Marine Evidence–based Sensitivity Assessment (MarESA) Review Eliane De-Bastos & Jacqueline Hill 2016-01-28 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitats/detail/1068]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: De-Bastos, E.S.R. & Hill, J., 2016. [Ophiothrix fragilis] and/or [Ophiocomina nigra] brittlestar beds on sublittoral mixed sediment. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinhab.1068.1 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literature Review of the Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) from the Pacific Coast of Mexico
    A literature review of the Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) from the Pacific coast of Mexico Rebeca Granja-Fernández1, María Dinorah Herrero-Pérezrul2, Andrés López-Pérez3, Alejandro Hernández-Morales4 & Pedro Diego Rangel-Solís3 1. Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Vicentina. CP 09340. D.F., México; [email protected] 2. Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas-Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Depto. de Pesquerías y Biología Marina. Avenida Instituto Politécnico Nacional s/n. Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita. C.P. 23096. La Paz, Baja California Sur, México; [email protected] 3. Departamento de Hidrobiología, División CBS, UAM-Iztapalapa. Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Vicentina, CP 09340, AP 55-535. D.F., México; [email protected], [email protected] 4. Programa de Licenciatura en Ecología Marina, Laboratorio de Ecología Cuantitativa, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero. Av. Gran Vía Tropical 20, Fraccionamiento Las Playas, CP 39390. Acapulco, Guerrero, México; [email protected] Received 30-V-2014. Corrected 03-X-2014. Accepted 17-XI-2014. Abstract: Despite the important effort of knowing the Ophiuroidea diversity in the Mexican Pacific, some mis- takes in the taxonomic nomenclature have pervaded through time. In order to clarify the latter, a checklist based on literature review of brittle stars from the Mexican Pacific is provided. We reviewed a total of 105 references that in total summarized 125 species of brittle stars from the Mexican Pacific (112) and the Gulf of California (97), belonging to two orders, 16 families and 50 genera. These records are higher than those reported on previ- ous studies carried out in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the Common Shallow-Water Brittle Stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) of the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228496999 Key to the common shallow-water brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) of the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea Article · January 2007 CITATIONS READS 10 702 1 author: Christopher Pomory University of West Florida 34 PUBLICATIONS 303 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Christopher Pomory on 21 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. 1 Key to the common shallow-water brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) of the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea CHRISTOPHER M. POMORY 2007 Department of Biology, University of West Florida, 11000 University Parkway, Pensacola, FL 32514, USA. [email protected] ABSTRACT A key is given for 85 species of ophiuroids from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea covering a depth range from the intertidal down to 30 m. Figures highlighting important anatomical features associated with couplets in the key are provided. 2 INTRODUCTION The Caribbean region is one of the major coral reef zoogeographic provinces and a region of intensive human use of marine resources for tourism and fisheries (Aide and Grau, 2004). With the world-wide decline of coral reefs, and deterioration of shallow-water marine habitats in general, ecological and biodiversity studies have become more important than ever before (Bellwood et al., 2004). Ecological and biodiversity studies require identification of collected specimens, often by biologists not specializing in taxonomy, and therefore identification guides easily accessible to a diversity of biologists are necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemichordate Phylogeny: a Molecular, and Genomic Approach By
    Hemichordate Phylogeny: A molecular, and genomic approach by Johanna Taylor Cannon A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 4, 2014 Keywords: phylogeny, evolution, Hemichordata, bioinformatics, invertebrates Copyright 2014 by Johanna Taylor Cannon Approved by Kenneth M. Halanych, Chair, Professor of Biological Sciences Jason Bond, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Leslie Goertzen, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Scott Santos, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Abstract The phylogenetic relationships within Hemichordata are significant for understanding the evolution of the deuterostomes. Hemichordates possess several important morphological structures in common with chordates, and they have been fixtures in hypotheses on chordate origins for over 100 years. However, current evidence points to a sister relationship between echinoderms and hemichordates, indicating that these chordate-like features were likely present in the last common ancestor of these groups. Therefore, Hemichordata should be highly informative for studying deuterostome character evolution. Despite their importance for understanding the evolution of chordate-like morphological and developmental features, relationships within hemichordates have been poorly studied. At present, Hemichordata is divided into two classes, the solitary, free-living enteropneust worms, and the colonial, tube- dwelling Pterobranchia. The objective of this dissertation is to elucidate the evolutionary relationships of Hemichordata using multiple datasets. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to Hemichordata and outlines the objectives for the dissertation research. Chapter 2 presents a molecular phylogeny of hemichordates based on nuclear ribosomal 18S rDNA and two mitochondrial genes. In this chapter, we suggest that deep-sea family Saxipendiidae is nested within Harrimaniidae, and Torquaratoridae is affiliated with Ptychoderidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Development of a Marine Landscape Classification for the Irish Sea
    Irish Sea Pilot - Report on the development of a marine landscape classification for the Irish Sea 7. Appendix II: RV Lough Foyle cruise (Irish) Sea Mounds (NW Irish Sea) Habitat Mapping Introduction and methods All surveys were undertaken aboard the RV Lough Foyle (DARD) during June 2003. Acoustic surveys A RoxAnn™ acoustic ground discrimination survey (AGDS) was undertaken of the main survey area between 1st and 3rd June 2003, by A. Mitchell. Two additional RoxAnn™ datasets were collected by M. Service on 23rd June 2003 during the multibeam sonar survey. All RoxAnn™ datasets were obtained using a hull-mounted 38kHz transducer, a GroundMaster RoxAnn™ signal processor combined with RoxMap software, saving at a rate of between 1 and 5s intervals. An Atlas differential Geographical Positioning Systems (dGPS), providing positional information, was integrated via the RoxMap laptop. Track spacing varied between 500m for the large area and 100m for the multibeam survey areas. Multibeam sonar datasets were collected for two of the (Irish) Sea Mounds on 23rd June 2003, using an EM2000 Multibeam Echosounder (MBES, Kongsberg Simrad Ltd; operators: J. Hancock and C. Harper.). The sonar has a frequency of 200kHz and a ping rate of 10Hz. It operates with 111 roll-stabilised beams per ping with a 1.5 degree beam width along-track and 2.5 degree beam width across-track. The system has an angular coverage of 120 degrees. In addition to bathymetric coverage, the system has an integrated seabed imaging capability through a combination of phase and amplitude detection (referred to here as ‘backscatter’). The EM2000 was deployed with the following ancillary parts: • Seapath 200 – this provides real-time heading, attitude, position and velocity solutions with a 1pps timing clock for update of the sonar together with full differential corrections supplied by the IALA GPS network.
    [Show full text]
  • Echinodermata
    Echinodermata Bruce A. Miller The phylum Echinodermata is a morphologically, ecologically, and taxonomically diverse group. Within the nearshore waters of the Pacific Northwest, representatives from all five major classes are found-the Asteroidea (sea stars), Echinoidea (sea urchins, sand dollars), Holothuroidea (sea cucumbers), Ophiuroidea (brittle stars, basket stars), and Crinoidea (feather stars). Habitats of most groups range from intertidal to beyond the continental shelf; this discussion is limited to species found no deeper than the shelf break, generally less than 200 m depth and within 100 km of the coast. Reproduction and Development With some exceptions, sexes are separate in the Echinodermata and fertilization occurs externally. Intraovarian brooders such as Leptosynapta must fertilize internally. For most species reproduction occurs by free spawning; that is, males and females release gametes more or less simultaneously, and fertilization occurs in the water column. Some species employ a brooding strategy and do not have pelagic larvae. Species that brood are included in the list of species found in the coastal waters of the Pacific Northwest (Table 1) but are not included in the larval keys presented here. The larvae of echinoderms are morphologically and functionally diverse and have been the subject of numerous investigations on larval evolution (e.g., Emlet et al., 1987; Strathmann et al., 1992; Hart, 1995; McEdward and Jamies, 1996)and functional morphology (e.g., Strathmann, 1971,1974, 1975; McEdward, 1984,1986a,b; Hart and Strathmann, 1994). Larvae are generally divided into two forms defined by the source of nutrition during the larval stage. Planktotrophic larvae derive their energetic requirements from capture of particles, primarily algal cells, and in at least some forms by absorption of dissolved organic molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group
    The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND FISHERIES CATCHES OF THE PITCAIRN ISLAND GROUP M.L.D. Palomares, D. Chaitanya, S. Harper, D. Zeller and D. Pauly A report prepared for the Global Ocean Legacy project of the Pew Environment Group by the Sea Around Us Project Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Daniel Pauly RECONSTRUCTION OF TOTAL MARINE FISHERIES CATCHES FOR THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS (1950-2009) ...................................................................................... 3 Devraj Chaitanya, Sarah Harper and Dirk Zeller DOCUMENTING THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY OF THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS THROUGH FISHBASE AND SEALIFEBASE ..................................................................................... 10 Maria Lourdes D. Palomares, Patricia M. Sorongon, Marianne Pan, Jennifer C. Espedido, Lealde U. Pacres, Arlene Chon and Ace Amarga APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 1: FAO AND RECONSTRUCTED CATCH DATA ......................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 2: TOTAL RECONSTRUCTED CATCH BY MAJOR TAXA ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Destructive Morphological Observations of the Fleshy Brittle Star, Asteronyx Loveni Using Micro-Computed Tomography (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea, Euryalida)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 663: 1–19 (2017) µCT description of Asteronyx loveni 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.663.11413 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Non-destructive morphological observations of the fleshy brittle star, Asteronyx loveni using micro-computed tomography (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea, Euryalida) Masanori Okanishi1, Toshihiko Fujita2, Yu Maekawa3, Takenori Sasaki3 1 Faculty of Science, Ibaraki University, 2-1-1 Bunkyo, Mito, Ibaraki, 310-8512 Japan 2 National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0005 Japan 3 University Museum, The Uni- versity of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan Corresponding author: Masanori Okanishi ([email protected]) Academic editor: Y. Samyn | Received 6 December 2016 | Accepted 23 February 2017 | Published 27 March 2017 http://zoobank.org/58DC6268-7129-4412-84C8-DCE3C68A7EC3 Citation: Okanishi M, Fujita T, Maekawa Y, Sasaki T (2017) Non-destructive morphological observations of the fleshy brittle star, Asteronyx loveni using micro-computed tomography (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea, Euryalida). ZooKeys 663: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.663.11413 Abstract The first morphological observation of a euryalid brittle star,Asteronyx loveni, using non-destructive X- ray micro-computed tomography (µCT) was performed. The body of euryalids is covered by thick skin, and it is very difficult to observe the ossicles without dissolving the skin. Computed tomography with micrometer resolution (approximately 4.5–15.4 µm) was used to construct 3D images of skeletal ossicles and soft tissues in the ophiuroid’s body. Shape and positional arrangement of taxonomically important ossicles were clearly observed without any damage to the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Macrofauna Production in a Hard-Bottom Reef Community
    J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. (1985), 65, 713-735 713 Printed in Great Britain ANNUAL MACROFAUNA PRODUCTION IN A HARD-BOTTOM REEF COMMUNITY C. L. GEORGE AND R. M. WARWICK Natural Environment Research Council, Institute for Marine Environment Research, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PLi 3DH (Figs. 1-6) Estimates of annual production of the major component species of macrofauna comprising a hard-bottom community at a depth of 41 m in the Bristol Channel have been made. The sea-bed in this region is covered with extensive reefs of the tube-building polychaete Sabellaria spinulosa. Total production is 34-1 g dry wt m~2 y"1, the mean annual biomass 245 g m~2 and the P/B ratio 14. Production is overwhelmingly dominated by the suspension-feeding brittlestar Ophio- thrix fragilis, resulting in a strongly concave species production-rank curve. In addition, there is a diverse fauna of nestling species with slow growth rates which reach maturity at a small body size: production rates for these species are low, but accurate production estimates are sometimes difficult. It is suggested that slow growth rates and small size may result partly from the physical restriction of the reef interstices but principally from the fact that Ophiothrix monopolizes the suspended food resource with an umbrella of feeding arms, and that the infauna of the reef is thus resource-limited. The production ecology at this site is compared with that of other benthic communities in the Bristol Channel. We have limited the detailed presentation of data to a few typical examples; however, data for other species of size frequency, biomass and production are available on request from the authors.
    [Show full text]