DOCSLIB.ORG

Rough Draft 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rough Draft 1 Nil Points, Douze Points, and Everything In Between: An Analysis of Political Voting Bias in the Eurovision Song Contest Anna Boulos April 2012 Advisor: Dr. Judith Kelley Sanford School of Public Policy Master’s of Public Policy Program Duke University Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Policy Question .............................................................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Overview of Eurovision and the Rules of the Contest ........................................................... 5 2.A. Eurovision’s Importance in Europe .................................................................................... 7 2.B. Eurovision and European Relations ................................................................................... 8 2.C. Potential Voting Biases Need to be Better Understood ...................................................... 9 3. Current Literature on ESC Voting ....................................................................................... 10 4. Hypotheses ............................................................................................................................... 12 5. Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 13 5.A. Voting Data ....................................................................................................................... 13 5.B. Song and Performance Characteristics .............................................................................. 13 5.C. Country Variables ............................................................................................................. 15 5.D. Statistical Model ............................................................................................................... 16 6. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 17 6.A. Neighbor and Patriotic Voting ...................................................................................... 18 6.B. Balkan Bloc ................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 1. Countries’ Relationship with the Balkan Bloc under the Televote ....................... 19 Figure 2. Countries’ Relationship with the Balkan Bloc under the Split Vote ..................... 20 6.C. Nordic Bloc ................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 3. Countries’ Relationship with the Nordic Bloc under the Televote ....................... 22 Figure 4. Countries’ Relationship with the Nordic Bloc under the Split Vote ..................... 23 6.D. Baltic Countries ............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 5. Countries’ Relationship with the Baltic countries under the Televote .................. 24 Figure 6. Countries’ Relationship with the Baltic Bloc under the Split Vote ....................... 25 6.E. Former-Soviet Countries ............................................................................................... 25 Figure 7. Countries’ Relationship with the Former-Soviet Countries under the Televote ... 26 Figure 8. Countries’ Relationship with the Former-Soviet Countries under the Split Vote . 27 6.F. EU Countries ................................................................................................................. 28 Figure 9. Countries’ Relationship with EU Members under the Televote ........................... 29 Figure 10. Countries’ Relationship with EU Members under the Split Vote ....................... 30 6.G. Big Five Countries ........................................................................................................ 30 Figure 11. Countries’ Relationships with the Big Five under the Televote .......................... 30 Figure 12. Countries’ Relationship with the Big Five under the Split Vote ................................. 32 7. Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 33 7.A. Limitations and Concluding Remarks ............................................................................... 36 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 38 Appendix A: Politics and Eurovision ....................................................................................... 38 Appendix B: Song and Performance Results ............................................................................ 40 Appendix C: Song and Performance Characteristics of the Bloc Analysis .............................. 41 Appendix D: Country Codes Used in the Tables ...................................................................... 43 2 Appendix E: Neighborly and Patriotic Voting .......................................................................... 44 Appendix F: Vote Results for the Balkan Bloc ........................................................................ 45 Appendix G: Vote Results for the Nordic Bloc ........................................................................ 45 Appendix H: Vote Results for Baltic Bloc ............................................................................... 46 Appendix I: Vote Results for the Soviet Bloc .......................................................................... 46 Appendix J: Vote Results for the EU ........................................................................................ 47 Appendix K: Vote Results for Big Five Bloc ........................................................................... 47 Appendix L: Vote Results for the Balkan Countries ................................................................ 48 Appendix M: Voting Results for Nordic Countries .................................................................. 51 Appendix N: Voting Results for the Soviet and Baltic Countries ............................................ 53 Appendix O: Voting Results for the Big Five Countries .......................................................... 56 Appendix P: Voting Results for Western Europe ..................................................................... 58 Works Cited ................................................................................................................................. 60 3 Abstract Most viewers assume voting in the Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) is politically motivated, but few empirical studies have addressed political voting bias. If these claims have any validity then Eurovision voting results would provide meaningful insight into European public opinion and the degree of assimilation amongst contest participants. This study examines political voting bias by estimating what predicts votes from participating countries across voting systems using data from 1989 – 2012, as well as numerous song, performance, and country variables. The findings suggest voting is politically biased, although song popularity is significant and predictive of voting behavior. The results further indicate that contest participants form into smaller regional voting blocs and are statistically likely to vote for their neighbors. This study supports the claims of political voting and that Eurovision voting patterns are meaningful indicators of public opinion and inter-regional relations. Policy Question Is voting in the Eurovision Song Contest politically biased? What do the biases in Eurovision voting tell us about European public opinion and intra-continental relations? 1. Introduction The Eurovision Song Contest, also called Eurovision or the ESC, is an annual competition between member broadcasters in the European Broadcasting Union (EBU). While the contest is technically between member broadcasters, each broadcaster represents a country, making Eurovision a competition between countries. The Contest started in 1956 to promote cultural unity as Europe pursued economic and political integration. Although many people now perceive Eurovision as a kitschy, frivolous event, the contest has undoubtedly grown into a key European cultural icon and one that promotes European unity (Allatson 2007). Moreover, it is highly politically charged, particularly in regards to whether countries vote for one another. As a 2012 Telegraph article states, “One night of Eurovision says more about European politics than a year of debates in the Strasbourg parliament” (Nelson 2012). Importantly, even though it is called Eurovision, countries from Asia and the Middle East regularly participate; in 2012, there were 42 participating countries. The enlargement of the competition calls into question the definition of Europe and what it means to be European. Eurovision offers insights into European politics and public opinion; however, the contest is not meant to be political (Yair 1995) and the EBU staunchly denies these claims. Despite widespread allegations that Eurovision is political and that song quality does not matter, few studies have addressed this issue. Understanding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Famous Abba Fans Talk: Conchita Wurst
    FAMOUS ABBA FANS TALK: CONCHITAby Stany Van WURSTWymeersch by Stany Van Wymeersch To narrow down Conchita Wurst (a.k.a. Tom voice, and it is such a harmony together. Neuwirth) as the bearded drag queen who What do you consider ABBA’s greatest won the Eurovision Song Contest for Austria merit? exactly forty years after ABBA’s victory with They made easy listening pop songs which Waterloo would be quite unfair. Indeed, since never became old-fashioned. They are totally winning the ESC, Conchita has established timeless. herself on the international scene as a singer Have you got a favourite ABBA song, one INTERVIEW with an impressive vocal range, as well as a that you would like to interpret one day? gay and cultural icon. Both the private person, I love Mamma Mia! This is my number one Tom, and the adopted personality, Conchita, choice at the karaoke bar (laughs). take a strong stance in favour of tolerance and Have you ever met one of the ABBA against discrimination. Appearances, gender members? and ethnicity should not matter when it comes Unfortunately, no. But if they read these lines, to the dignity and freedom of individuals, she they probably would like to write a song for me. pointed out. They are ‘Wurst’ [meaningless], as In your opinion, why are ABBA so popular the Austrians would say. within the LGBT (Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/ Transgender) community? In your opinion, how important was ABBA’s Easy pop which works and fabulous and 1974 victory in the Eurovision Song Contest? glamorous dresses. Voilà! And who could resist I think it was an extremely important moment a song called Dancing Queen? for Eurovision.
    [Show full text]
  • Songs by Artist
    Reil Entertainment Songs by Artist Karaoke by Artist Title Title &, Caitlin Will 12 Gauge Address In The Stars Dunkie Butt 10 Cc 12 Stones Donna We Are One Dreadlock Holiday 19 Somethin' Im Mandy Fly Me Mark Wills I'm Not In Love 1910 Fruitgum Co Rubber Bullets 1, 2, 3 Redlight Things We Do For Love Simon Says Wall Street Shuffle 1910 Fruitgum Co. 10 Years 1,2,3 Redlight Through The Iris Simon Says Wasteland 1975 10, 000 Maniacs Chocolate These Are The Days City 10,000 Maniacs Love Me Because Of The Night Sex... Because The Night Sex.... More Than This Sound These Are The Days The Sound Trouble Me UGH! 10,000 Maniacs Wvocal 1975, The Because The Night Chocolate 100 Proof Aged In Soul Sex Somebody's Been Sleeping The City 10Cc 1Barenaked Ladies Dreadlock Holiday Be My Yoko Ono I'm Not In Love Brian Wilson (2000 Version) We Do For Love Call And Answer 11) Enid OS Get In Line (Duet Version) 112 Get In Line (Solo Version) Come See Me It's All Been Done Cupid Jane Dance With Me Never Is Enough It's Over Now Old Apartment, The Only You One Week Peaches & Cream Shoe Box Peaches And Cream Straw Hat U Already Know What A Good Boy Song List Generator® Printed 11/21/2017 Page 1 of 486 Licensed to Greg Reil Reil Entertainment Songs by Artist Karaoke by Artist Title Title 1Barenaked Ladies 20 Fingers When I Fall Short Dick Man 1Beatles, The 2AM Club Come Together Not Your Boyfriend Day Tripper 2Pac Good Day Sunshine California Love (Original Version) Help! 3 Degrees I Saw Her Standing There When Will I See You Again Love Me Do Woman In Love Nowhere Man 3 Dog Night P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UMG V Veoh 9Th Opening Brief.Pdf
    Case: 09-56777 04/20/2010 Page: 1 of 100 ID: 7308924 DktEntry: 11-1 No. 09-56777 ____________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ___________________ UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP.; SONGS OF UNIVERSAL, INC.; UNIVERSAL-POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, INC.; RONDOR MUSIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.; UNIVERSAL MUSIC—MGB NA LLC; UNIVERSAL MUSIC—Z TUNES LLC; UNIVERSAL MUSIC—MBG MUSIC PUBLISHING LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. VEOH NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. _______________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division—Los Angeles Honorable A. Howard Matz, District Judge __________________________________ APPELLANTS’ BRIEF _____________________________________ Steven Marenberg, Esq. State Bar No. 101033 Brian Ledahl, Esq. State Bar No. 186579 Carter Batsell State Bar No. 254396 IRELL & MANELLA, LLP 1800 Avenue of the Stars Suite 900 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 277-1010 Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS 2221905 Case: 09-56777 04/20/2010 Page: 2 of 100 ID: 7308924 DktEntry: 11-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT................................................ 2 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ................................................................. 3 ISSUES PRESENTED ..................................................................................... 4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ........................................................................ 6 FACTS ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Isabella Clarke Selected to Represent Australia at the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2017 on Monday 27 November
    RELEASED: SUNDAY 10 SEPTEMBER 2017 Isabella Clarke selected to represent Australia at the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2017 on Monday 27 November ABC is excited to announce that talented young singer Isabella Clarke will represent Australia at the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2017 (JESC) held on Sunday 26 November at the Tbilisi Sports Palace, Georgia. From Victoria, Isabella is a 13-year-old singing sensation who made her debut on the Melbourne singing scene four years ago. Since then she’s received many accolades performing at various singing competitions and, at present, holds a coveted principal vocalist role in the Victorian State Schools Spectacular. Isabella is self-confessed foodie who enjoys spending time with her family and friends and credits megastars Beyoncé and Mary J. Blige as her inspiration for singing. She loves Australian comedy television shows, knows how to laugh at herself, and is focused and determined both at school and in performing. Tipped for a bright future, Isabella hopes to join her idols and become an international recording artist. ABC and production partner Blink TV selected Isabella in consultation with leading Australian record companies. Isabella Clarke said: “I’m so honoured to be given the opportunity to represent Australia at such an amazing event. I can’t wait to start rehearsals and film the music video! I’m also looking forward to visiting Georgia for the first time and meeting all the other performers. It’s a dream come true and I hope I do my family and Australia proud.” “Isabella displayed all the qualities we were looking for in this year’s Australian representative,” says Michael Carrington, Head of ABC Children’s Television.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Digital Music Distribution" (2012)
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Spring 4-5-2012 The ffecE ts of Digital Music Distribution Rama A. Dechsakda [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp The er search paper was a study of how digital music distribution has affected the music industry by researching different views and aspects. I believe this topic was vital to research because it give us insight on were the music industry is headed in the future. Two main research questions proposed were; “How is digital music distribution affecting the music industry?” and “In what way does the piracy industry affect the digital music industry?” The methodology used for this research was performing case studies, researching prospective and retrospective data, and analyzing sales figures and graphs. Case studies were performed on one independent artist and two major artists whom changed the digital music industry in different ways. Another pair of case studies were performed on an independent label and a major label on how changes of the digital music industry effected their business model and how piracy effected those new business models as well. I analyzed sales figures and graphs of digital music sales and physical sales to show the differences in the formats. I researched prospective data on how consumers adjusted to the digital music advancements and how piracy industry has affected them. Last I concluded all the data found during this research to show that digital music distribution is growing and could possibly be the dominant format for obtaining music, and the battle with piracy will be an ongoing process that will be hard to end anytime soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurovision’ European Contest ∗
    Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid https://repositorio.uam.es Esta es la versión de autor de la comunicación de congreso publicada en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in: WIMS '11: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, ACM, 2011. 25 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1988688.1988718 Copyright: © 2011 ACM El acceso a la versión del editor puede requerir la suscripción del recurso Access to the published version may require subscription A Study on the Impact of Crowd-Based Voting Schemes in the ’Eurovision’ European Contest ∗ Gema Bello Orgaz, Raul Cajias and David Camacho Computer Science Department Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid, Spain {gema.bello, raul.cajias, david.camacho}@uam.es ABSTRACT Categories and Subject Descriptors The Eurovision contest has been the reference on european H.3.3 [Information Systems]: Information Storage and song contests for the past 50 years. Countries in the Euro- Retrieval|Information Search and Retrieval, Clustering pean Union can shows the rest of the participants their cur- rent music tendencies. This phenomena has been studied in General Terms domains like physic and social sciences to find correlations CPM, Edge Betweenness, Data Mining, Eurovision, Televot- between contests and current political and socio-economy ing, Voting Partnership trends in EU. The inclusion of web and social technologies some years ago, have caused a disruption in the traditional voting system whereby the audience is encouraged to par- Keywords ticipate by casting votes for their favorite song. As a result, Graph Based Algorithms, Network, Web Mining, Social Min- this system yields new, relevant information that may be ex- ing trapolated to social and political tendencies in Europe with a higher degree accuracy than by data collected using the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mtv and Transatlantic Cold War Music Videos
    102 MTV AND TRANSATLANTIC COLD WAR MUSIC VIDEOS WILLIAM M. KNOBLAUCH INTRODUCTION In 1986 Music Television (MTV) premiered “Peace Sells”, the latest video from American metal band Megadeth. In many ways, “Peace Sells” was a standard pro- motional video, full of lip-synching and head-banging. Yet the “Peace Sells” video had political overtones. It featured footage of protestors and police in riot gear; at one point, the camera draws back to reveal a teenager watching “Peace Sells” on MTV. His father enters the room, grabs the remote and exclaims “What is this garbage you’re watching? I want to watch the news.” He changes the channel to footage of U.S. President Ronald Reagan at the 1986 nuclear arms control summit in Reykjavik, Iceland. The son, perturbed, turns to his father, replies “this is the news,” and lips the channel back. Megadeth’s song accelerates, and the video re- turns to riot footage. The song ends by repeatedly asking, “Peace sells, but who’s buying?” It was a prescient question during a 1980s in which Cold War militarism and the nuclear arms race escalated to dangerous new highs.1 In the 1980s, MTV elevated music videos to a new cultural prominence. Of course, most music videos were not political.2 Yet, as “Peace Sells” suggests, dur- ing the 1980s—the decade of Reagan’s “Star Wars” program, the Soviet war in Afghanistan, and a robust nuclear arms race—music videos had the potential to relect political concerns. MTV’s founders, however, were so culturally conserva- tive that many were initially wary of playing African American artists; addition- ally, record labels were hesitant to put their top artists onto this new, risky chan- 1 American President Ronald Reagan had increased peace-time deicit defense spending substantially.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Sonevytsky. Wild Music Sound and Sovereignty in Ukraine
    Maria Sonevytsky. Wild Music Sound and Sovereignty in Ukraine. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2019. Reviewed by: Olga Zaitseva-Herz Source: Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal 7 (2020): 255–257 Published by: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy http://kmhj.ukma.edu.ua/ Maria Sonevytsky Wild Music Sound and Sovereignty in Ukraine Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2019. 281 pp. ISBN 978-0-8195-7915-7 Reviewed by Olga Zaitseva-Herz This work by Maria Sonevytsky is based on her extensive research, which began in 2004 in Ukraine and lasted for over a decade, culminating in a fieldwork trip in 2015 and research updates up to 2019. The author explores the topic not only from the academic perspective but also from the performing angle, as Sonevytsky is a practicing multidisciplinary professional with extensive professional training and significant performing experience. Sonevytsky’s unique capacity to see connections between music and Ukrainian politics in the context of history already found its reflection in her earlier projects. “The Chornobyl Songs Project: Living Culture from a Lost World” was released in 2015 by Smithsonian Folkways and elaborated on the effects of the Chornobyl nuclear disaster and the revival of rural musical repertoires. Focusing on such key terms as “sovereignty” and “Wildness,” Sonevytsky creates a unique blend of fields combining ethnomusicology, politics, feminist studies, and history. In the preface, Sonevytsky mentions that the key term “sovereignty” emerged from the acuteness of the political instability in Ukraine in the years when she was conducting her research. The second key- term “Wildness” was in her original focus when she studied the reflections of civilization and barbarism expressed in the sonic products of Crimean Tatars and Hutsuls.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Geopolitics in the Eurovision Song Contest Introduction
    Gender and Geopolitics in the Eurovision Song Contest Introduction Catherine Baker Lecturer, University of Hull [email protected] http://www.suedosteuropa.uni-graz.at/cse/en/baker Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 2015, 2(1), 74-93 Contemporary Southeastern Europe is an online, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, scholarly, and policy-oriented research on issues relevant to societies in Southeastern Europe. For more information, please contact us at [email protected] or visit our website at www.contemporarysee.org Introduction: Gender and Geopolitics in the Eurovision Song Contest Catherine Baker* Introduction From the vantage point of the early 1990s, when the end of the Cold War not only inspired the discourses of many Eurovision performances but created opportunities for the map of Eurovision participation itself to significantly expand in a short space of time, neither the scale of the contemporary Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) nor the extent to which a field of “Eurovision research” has developed in cultural studies and its related disciplines would have been recognisable. In 1993, when former Warsaw Pact states began to participate in Eurovision for the first time and Yugoslav successor states started to compete in their own right, the contest remained a one-night-per- year theatrical presentation staged in venues that accommodated, at most, a couple of thousand spectators and with points awarded by expert juries from each participating country. Between 1998 and 2004, Eurovision’s organisers, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), and the national broadcasters responsible for hosting each edition of the contest expanded it into an ever grander spectacle: hosted in arenas before live audiences of 10,000 or more, with (from 2004) a semi-final system enabling every eligible country and broadcaster to participate each year, and with (between 1998 and 2008) points awarded almost entirely on the basis of telephone voting by audiences in each participating state.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity, Spectacle and Representation: Israeli Entries at the Eurovision
    Identity, spectacle and representation: Israeli entries at the Eurovision Song Contest1 Identidad, espectáculo y representación: las candidaturas de Israel en el Festival de la Canción de Eurovisión José Luis Panea holds a Degree in Fine Arts (University of Salamanca, 2013), and has interchange stays at Univer- sity of Lisbon and University of Barcelona. Master’s degree in Art and Visual Practices Research at University of Castilla-La Mancha with End of Studies Special Prize (2014) and Pre-PhD contract in the research project ARES (www.aresvisuals.net). Editor of the volume Secuencias de la experiencia, estadios de lo visible. Aproximaciones al videoarte español 2017) with Ana Martínez-Collado. Aesthetic of Modernity teacher and writer in several re- views especially about his research line ‘Identity politics at the Eurovision Song Contest’. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, España. [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-8989-9547 Recibido: 01/08/2018 - Aceptado: 14/11/2018 Received: 01/08/2018 - Accepted: 14/11/2018 Abstract: Resumen: Through a sophisticated investment, both capital and symbolic, A partir de una sofisticada inversión, capital y simbólica, el Festival the Eurovision Song Contest generates annually a unique audio- de Eurovisión genera anualmente un espectáculo audiovisual en la ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978 visual spectacle, debating concepts as well as community, televisión pública problematizando conceptos como “comunidad”, Europeanness or cultural identity. Following the recent researches “Europeidad” e “identidad cultural”. Siguiendo las investigaciones re- from the An-glo-Saxon ambit, we will research different editions of cientes en el ámbito anglosajón, recorreremos sus distintas ediciones the show.
    [Show full text]
  • Inte Bara Bögarnas Fest” En Queer Kulturstudie Av Melodifestivalen
    ”Inte bara bögarnas fest” En queer kulturstudie av Melodifestivalen Institutionen för etnologi, religionshistoria och genusvetenskap Examensarbete 30 HP Mastersprogrammet i genusvetenskap 120 HP Vårterminen 2018 Författare: Olle Jilkén Handledare: Kalle Berggren Abstract Uppsatsen undersöker hur TV-programmet Melodifestivalen förhåller sig till sin homokulturella status genom att studera programmets heteronormativa ramar och porträttering av queerhet. Det teoretiska ramverket grundar sig i representationsteori, kulturstudier, gaystudier och queerteori. Analysen resulterar i att de heteronormativa ramarna framställer heterosexualitet som en given norm i programmet. Detta uppvisas bland annat av en implicit heterosexuell manlig blick som sexualiserar kvinnokroppar och ser avklädda män, queerhet och femininitet som något komiskt. Detta komplicerar tidigare studiers bild av melodifestivaler som huvudsakligen investerade och accepterande av queera subjekt. Den queera representationen består främst av homosexuella män. Den homosexuellt manliga identiteten görs inte enhetlig och bryter mot heteronormativa ideal i olika grad. Några sätt som den homosexuellt manliga identiteten porträtteras är artificiell, feminin, icke-monogam, barnslig och investerad i schlager. Analysen påpekar att programmet har queert innehåll trots dess kommersiella framställning och normativa ideal. Nyckelord: Melodifestivalen, schlager, genusvetenskap, homokultur, gaystudier, bögkultur, heteronormativitet. Innehållsförteckning 1. En älskad och hatad ”homofilfestival” 1
    [Show full text]
  • Dan Blaze's Karaoke Song List
    Dan Blaze's Karaoke Song List - By Artist 112 Peaches And Cream 411 Dumb 411 On My Knees 411 Teardrops 911 A Little Bit More 911 All I Want Is You 911 How Do You Want Me To Love You 911 More Than A Woman 911 Party People (Friday Night) 911 Private Number 911 The Journey 10 cc Donna 10 cc I'm Mandy 10 cc I'm Not In Love 10 cc The Things We Do For Love 10 cc Wall St Shuffle 10 cc Dreadlock Holiday 10000 Maniacs These Are The Days 1910 Fruitgum Co Simon Says 1999 Man United Squad Lift It High 2 Evisa Oh La La La 2 Pac California Love 2 Pac & Elton John Ghetto Gospel 2 Unlimited No Limits 2 Unlimited No Limits 20 Fingers Short Dick Man 21st Century Girls 21st Century Girls 3 Doors Down Kryptonite 3 Oh 3 feat Katy Perry Starstrukk 3 Oh 3 Feat Kesha My First Kiss 3 S L Take It Easy 30 Seconds To Mars The Kill 38 Special Hold On Loosely 3t Anything 3t With Michael Jackson Why 4 Non Blondes What's Up 4 Non Blondes What's Up 5 Seconds Of Summer Don't Stop 5 Seconds Of Summer Good Girls 5 Seconds Of Summer She Looks So Perfect 5 Star Rain Or Shine Updated 08.04.2015 www.blazediscos.com - www.facebook.com/djdanblaze Dan Blaze's Karaoke Song List - By Artist 50 Cent 21 Questions 50 Cent Candy Shop 50 Cent In Da Club 50 Cent Just A Lil Bit 50 Cent Feat Neyo Baby By Me 50 Cent Featt Justin Timberlake & Timbaland Ayo Technology 5ive & Queen We Will Rock You 5th Dimension Aquarius Let The Sunshine 5th Dimension Stoned Soul Picnic 5th Dimension Up Up and Away 5th Dimension Wedding Bell Blues 98 Degrees Because Of You 98 Degrees I Do 98 Degrees The Hardest
    [Show full text]