Twenty Years of Subduction Zone Science: Subduction Top to Bottom 2 (ST2B-2)
Twenty Years of Subduction Zone Science: Subduction Top to Bottom 2 (ST2B-2) G.E. Bebout*, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, USA; D.W. Scholl, emeritus, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA, and University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA; R.J. Stern, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083, USA; L.M. Wallace, University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, Austin, Texas 78758, USA, and GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand; and P. Agard, Institut des Sciences de la Terre de Paris, UPMC Université Paris 06, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France ABSTRACT become increasingly interested in the pro- resultant publication encourages continued No other plate-tectonic setting has cess since the term was introduced by efforts along these lines. attracted such diverse, multidisciplinary White et al. (1970; also see the prescient “SUBCON” (Subduction Conference) research as convergent margins. Under- sketch of a subduction zone by Coats, was held in Avalon, Santa Catalina Island, standing the dynamics of subduction is 1962) on the heels of the plate tectonic rev- California, USA, on 12–17 June 1994, particularly important for realistic assess- olution. Subduction zones are where litho- largely funded by the United States ment of associated hazards such as earth- sphere is recycled into the mantle and they Geological Survey (USGS) but with addi- quakes, tsunamis, and volcanic eruptions. provide the third dimension for the tional support from the National Science A number of recent initiatives have been ~55,000 km length of convergent plate Foundation (NSF).
[Show full text]