DOCSLIB.ORG

Convergent Plate Margins, Subduction Zones, and Island Arcs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Convergent Plate Margins, Subduction Zones, and Island Arcs Convergent Plate Margins, Subduction Zones, and Island Arcs Bob Stern U TX Dallas Kansas State University March 26, 2015 GeoPRISMS Geodynamic Processes at RIfting and Subducting MarginS NSF-funded initiative – please look at NSF program anouncement Please go to GeoPRISMS.org for info about meetings etc. 2 main initiatives: Rift Initiation & Evolution (RIE) Subduction Cycles & Deformation (SCD) 3 sites: Alaska-Aleutian, Cascadia, New Zealand Structure of this Talk • Convergent plate margin, subduction zone, and arc-trench system definitions. • How upper and lower plates control arc- trench system behavior. • How do we study subduction zones? • Seismogenic Zone • Arc magmas A Few Definitions Convergent Plate Margin, Subduction Zone, and Arc-Trench System Convergent Plate Margin: 2-D (surficial) plate boundary that is geometrically required for Plate Tectonic theory. Subduction Zone: 3-D region defined by asymmetric sinking of lithosphere into the mantle. Defined by earthquakes at depths <670 km and can be traced deeper with seismic tomography. Subduction Zones are not required but implied by Plate Tectonics. Arc-trench system: bathymetric and crustal expression of tectonic and magmatic processes above a subduction zone sometimes called “island arc”, “magmatic arc”, or just “arc”. Of these 3 related items, only Arcs are likely to be recognized in the geologic record. Convergent Plate Margins 55,000 km of subduction zones and continental collision zones Boxes show GeoPRISMS SCD focus sites Convergent Plate Margins are geometric requirements of Euler theorem = surficial features, like Divergent and Conservative Plate Boundaries No information in Plate Tectonic theory about how plates are destroyed. In fact, the process of destroying lithosphere requires a third dimension (subduction zone), ot required by other two plate boundaries. Subduction zone Mantle slab wedge Region in Earth’s upper mantle defined by sinking of oceanic lithosphere and associated processes (earthquakes, metamorphism, fluid release, induced convection, and melt generation). Entirely subsurface and hidden from view. The process of destroying lithosphere in a subduction zone also creates the crust of an Arc-Trench system* *preserved in geologic record; used to infer past presence of convergent plate margin and subduction zone A few notes about Arc-Trench systems 1. Importance of the overlying plate 1. Importance of the subducting plate 2. Why arc-trench systems around the Eastern Pacific (the Americas) are so different from those in the Western Pacific Eastern Pacific (Andes) Western Pacific (near Japan) 1. The nature of the crust on the overriding plate exerts strong controls on the nature of the arc-trench system (ATS) ATS on continental crust: Arc Volcanoes and inner forearc above sealevel ATS on oceanic crust: Only tops of tallest volcanoes are above sealevel Andean-type arcs have volcanoes that rise high above sealevel Llullaillaco (Argentina-Chile Andes) 6,739 m Last erupted 1877 Paranal Observatory (2635m) Llullaillaco 200 km away Volcanoes in Oceanic Arcs are often submarine NW-Rota 1 Submarine volcano Summit is 517 m below sealevel Started erupting sometime before 2003, quit erupting sometime between 2010 and 2014 Ongoing: MESH expedition to Kermadec Arc • Mapping, Exploration, and Sampling at Havre • From March 27 to April 17 2015, an international team will use remotely operated vehicle Jason and the autonomous underwater vehicle Sentry to investigate the largest recorded submarine explosive eruption in history • Follow blog: Google “MESH Havre volcano” IODP 350, 351, 352 Study the origin and evolution of the Izu-Bonin Arc March-Sept. 2014 Japan JOIDES Resolution 2. Importance of Subducting Plate The buoyancy* of the downgoing plate also exerts a strong influence on the tectonics and magmatism of arcs. *determined by age of downgoing plate and thickness of crust. Very buoyant downgoing crust results in Subduction Zone failure = continental collision. Uyeda & Kanamori, 1979 3. Map of seafloor age reveals why W. Pacific and E. Pacific arcs are very different Müller et al., 1997 JGR-B Old, dense: Young, buoyant: subduct readily Resist subduction Müller et al., 1997 JGR-B Subduction of young, buoyant seafloor can result in overall compression, forming a reararc fold-and-thrust belt. Examples: Argentine Precordillera, Laramide orogen of USA Chracteristic of Eastern Pacific convergent margins Subduction of old, dense seafloor results in strong extension leading to seafloor spreading the formation of a backarc basin. Common in Western Pacific Subduction Zone Earthquakes define the Wadati-Benioff* Zone Most earthquakes are limited to upper 20 km of Earth, but subduction zone earthquakes are as deep as 670km! Why? Subducted slabs are cold. Cold things are brittle and break (making earthquakes), hot things bend and flow (no earthquakes) Shallow (<50km), Intermediate (50-250 km) and Deep (>250 km) subduction zone earthquakes have different causes. Kiyoo Wadati and Hugo Benioff are Japanese Mariana Subduction Zone Seismicity and US geophysicists who independently discovered deep, inclined seismic zones. Imaging of the mantle wedge using Subduction Zone earthquakes Thanks to Geoff Abers From subduction zone From other side of Earth Tomography gives volume-averaged properties; Other methods resolve layering Seismic tomography and seismicity in and above the Tonga subduction zone ∆ Vp Zhao et al. 1997 Mariana Arc-trench-backarc basin system Mantle tomography and magmagenesis Barklage et al. 2015 The Seismogenic Zone: The subduction interface 20-50km deep beneath the forearc The Seismogenic Zone Seismogenic Zone The deadliest, most powerful earthquakes occur in subduction zones at depths of ~20-50 km (12-30 miles) The Seismogenic Zone is especially dangerous because these are thrust- type earthquakes, near the surface, and beneath coastal areas. These are the earthquakes that generate most tsunamis. The 13 biggest Earthquakes (blue stars, with Magnitude) Earthquake magnitudes 8.5 to 9.5 All are instrumentally recorded events except the Cascadia EQ of 1700. All of these “monster quakes” happened in the seismogenic zone. Yellow dots are EQs of all mechanism bigger than ~Mw 5. Orange triangles are active volcanoes. Blue lines are plate boundaries. Interseismic interval (years) Seismic interval (seconds) 1 & 4 2 & 3 The Earthquake cycle in the Seismogenic Zone: 1) Plate convergence is continuous but the two plates are locked across the shallow plate interface. This causes compression and uplift of the overlying plate margin (forearc). 2) Strain builds up until it exceeds the strength of the fault; the locked zone breaks and a great earthquake occurs. 3) During rupture, built-up strain is released, allowing the upper plate to relax. Subsidence & horizontal extension occurs in regions that were uplifted & compressed previously. 4) Cycle starts over modified from http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/eqcycle_e.php Concept of earthquake epicenter is misleading in a quake this big; in fact a very large region ruptured, outlined by the dashed box. NY Times 2011 Tohoku Earthquake (Mw = 9.0) 1999 Interpretation Kodaira et al. 2011 Let’s get igneous! Anatahan 5-10-03 Mantles of silicate planets generate basalt Too much basalt Fe-free basalt biggest basalt volcano in solar system Loads of basalt Lots of basalt Basalt: 50 wt. % SiO2 Asteroid Vesta4 10% CaO, 15% Al2O3; rest is diameter ~525 km mostly MgO and FeO. Lots of basalt Earth’s mantle produces basalt at 3 tectonic settings: Mid-ocean ridges, hotspots, and arcs Convergent margin basalts differ most importantly in their MUCH GREATER abundance of magmatic water. In order to understand how arc magmas are generated, need to understand composition of downgoing lithosphere, oceanic crust, and sediments (slab) What causes melting to generate arc magmas? Why is the magmatic arc found ~105 km above subducted slab? H (= vertical distance from slab to volcanic front) ranges from 72 to 173 km with a mean of 105 km Syracuse et al., 2006 Recall composition of subducting plate: How does this contribute to the generation of arc magmas? The Downgoing The Downgoing Plate Subducted slab chills shallow mantle beneath forearc and draws in hot asthenosphere at greater depth (induced convection) Central America 105 km is “turning radius” of asthenospheric mantle. Addition of slab-derived fluids cause it to melt. Follow temperatures at 3 places on subducted plate Western Pacific Subduction Zone 105 km Sediments Eastern Pacific Subduction Zone melt The base of the mantle wedge above the subducted slab is transformed by fluids released from the slab Top: Receiver function seismic reflectivity profile beneath NE Japan (inset). Red and blue colors correspond to velocity increase and decrease with depth, respectively. Bottom: Interpretation on top of the reflectivity profile. Red triangles indicate active and dormant volcanoes. Kawakatsu et al. 2007 At ~105 km depth, there is a huge temperature gradient across slab interface ∆T ~800°C in 20 km NE Japan Athenosphere Metamorphosed Greenstone: seafloor basalt Oceanic crust metamorphosed in Greenschist facies: minerals contain ~5 wt. % water (<20 km deep). …is metamorphosed to… Blueschist: seafloor basalt metamorphosed in Blueschist facies. Minerals contain ~ 2 wt. % water (20- 60 km deep). …is metamorphosed to …. Eclogite: composed of 2 minerals Na- pyroxene (omphacite) and garnet (almandine – pyrope). Minerals contain ~0 wt. % water (>60 km deep). Water budget beneath NE Japan arc (Honshu) Schematic cross
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ocean Trench
    R E S O U R C E L I B R A R Y E N C Y C L O P E D I C E N T RY Ocean trench Ocean trenches are long, narrow depressions on the seafloor. These chasms are the deepest parts of the ocean—and some of the deepest natural spots on Earth. G R A D E S 5 - 12+ S U B J E C T S Earth Science, Geology, Geography, Physical Geography C O N T E N T S 11 Images, 1 Video, 2 Links For the complete encyclopedic entry with media resources, visit: http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/ocean-trench/ Ocean trenches are long, narrow depressions on the seafloor. These chasms are the deepest parts of the ocean—and some of the deepest natural spots on Earth. Ocean trenches are found in every ocean basin on the planet, although the deepest ocean trenches ring the Pacific as part of the so-called “Ring of Fire” that also includes active volcanoes and earthquake zones. Ocean trenches are a result of tectonic activity, which describes the movement of the Earth’s lithosphere. In particular, ocean trenches are a feature of convergent plate boundaries, where two or more tectonic plates meet. At many convergent plate boundaries, dense lithosphere melts or slides beneath less-dense lithosphere in a process called subduction, creating a trench. Ocean trenches occupy the deepest layer of the ocean, the hadalpelagic zone. The intense pressure, lack of sunlight, and frigid temperatures of the hadalpelagic zone make ocean trenches some of the most unique habitats on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologists Suggest Horseshoe Abyssal Plain May Be Start of a Subduction Zone 8 May 2019, by Bob Yirka
    Geologists suggest Horseshoe Abyssal Plain may be start of a subduction zone 8 May 2019, by Bob Yirka against one another. Over by the Iberian Peninsula, the opposite appears to be happening—the African and Eurasian plates are pulling apart as the former creeps east toward the Americas. Duarte noted that back in 2012, other researchers conducting seismic wave tests found what appeared to be a dense mass of unknown material beneath the epicenter of the 1969 quake. Some in the field suggested it could be the start of a subduction zone. Then, last year, another team conducted high-resolution imaging of the area and also found evidence of the mass, confirming that it truly existed. Other research has shown that the area just above the mass experiences routine tiny earthquakes. Duarte suggests the evidence to date indicates that the bottom of the plate is peeling away. This could happen, he explained, due to serpentinization in which water percolates through plate fractures and reacts with material beneath the surface, resulting A composite image of the Western hemisphere of the in the formation of soft green minerals. The soft Earth. Credit: NASA mineral layer, he suggests, is peeling away. And if that is the case, then it is likely the area is in the process of creating a subduction zone. He reports that he and his team members built models of their A team of geologists led by João Duarte gave a ideas and that they confirmed what he suspected. presentation at this past month's European The earthquakes were the result of the process of Geosciences Union meeting that included a birthing a new subduction zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematic Reconstruction of the Caribbean Region Since the Early Jurassic
    Earth-Science Reviews 138 (2014) 102–136 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Kinematic reconstruction of the Caribbean region since the Early Jurassic Lydian M. Boschman a,⁎, Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen a, Trond H. Torsvik b,c,d, Wim Spakman a,b, James L. Pindell e,f a Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands b Center for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, Sem Sælands vei 24, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway c Center for Geodynamics, Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7491 Trondheim, Norway d School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS 2050 Johannesburg, South Africa e Tectonic Analysis Ltd., Chestnut House, Duncton, West Sussex, GU28 OLH, England, UK f School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3YE, UK article info abstract Article history: The Caribbean oceanic crust was formed west of the North and South American continents, probably from Late Received 4 December 2013 Jurassic through Early Cretaceous time. Its subsequent evolution has resulted from a complex tectonic history Accepted 9 August 2014 governed by the interplay of the North American, South American and (Paleo-)Pacific plates. During its entire Available online 23 August 2014 tectonic evolution, the Caribbean plate was largely surrounded by subduction and transform boundaries, and the oceanic crust has been overlain by the Caribbean Large Igneous Province (CLIP) since ~90 Ma. The consequent Keywords: absence of passive margins and measurable marine magnetic anomalies hampers a quantitative integration into GPlates Apparent Polar Wander Path the global circuit of plate motions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dangling Slab, Amplified Arc Volcanism, Mantle Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Kamchatka Plate Corner
    AGU Geodynamics Series Volume 30, PLATE BOUNDARY ZONES Edited by Seth Stein and Jeffrey T. Freymueller, p. 295-324 1 A Dangling Slab, Amplified Arc Volcanism, Mantle Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Kamchatka Plate Corner Jeffrey Park,1 Yadim Levin,1 Mark Brandon,1 Jonathan Lees,2 Valerie Peyton,3 Evgenii Gordeev ) 4 Alexei Ozerov ,4 Book chapter in press with "Plate Boundary Zones," edited by Seth Stein and Jeffrey Freymuller Abstract The Kamchatka peninsula in Russian East Asia lies at the junction of a transcurrent plate boundary, aligned with the western Aleutian Islands, and a steeply-dipping subduction zone with near-normal convergence. Seismicity patterns and P-wave tomography argue that subducting Pacific lithosphere terminates at the Aleutian junction, and that the downdip extension (>150km depth) of the slab edge is missing. Seismic observables of elastic anisotropy (SKS splitting and Love-Rayleigh scattering) are consistent \Vith asthenospheric strain that rotates from trench-parallel beneath the descending slab to trench-normal beyond its edge. Present-day arc volcanism is concentrated near the slab edge, in the Klyuchevskoy and Sheveluch eruptive centers. Loss of the downdip slab edge, whether from thermo-convective or ductile instability, and subsequent "slab-window" mantle return flow is indicated by widespread Quaternary volcanism in the Sredinny Range inland of Klyuchevskoy and Sheveluch, as well as the inferred Quaternary uplift of the central Kamchatka depression. The slab beneath Klyuchevskoy has shallower dip (35°) than the subduction zone farther south (55°) suggesting a transient lofting of the slab edge, either from asthenospheric flow or the loss of downdip load.
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Text PDF (Final Published Version)
    Pritchard, M. E., de Silva, S. L., Michelfelder, G., Zandt, G., McNutt, S. R., Gottsmann, J., West, M. E., Blundy, J., Christensen, D. H., Finnegan, N. J., Minaya, E., Sparks, R. S. J., Sunagua, M., Unsworth, M. J., Alvizuri, C., Comeau, M. J., del Potro, R., Díaz, D., Diez, M., ... Ward, K. M. (2018). Synthesis: PLUTONS: Investigating the relationship between pluton growth and volcanism in the Central Andes. Geosphere, 14(3), 954-982. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01578.1 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY-NC Link to published version (if available): 10.1130/GES01578.1 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Geo Science World at https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01578.1 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: PLUTONS: Investigating the Relationship between Pluton Growth and Volcanism in the Central Andes GEOSPHERE Synthesis: PLUTONS: Investigating the relationship between pluton growth and volcanism in the Central Andes GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 3 M.E. Pritchard1,2, S.L. de Silva3, G. Michelfelder4, G. Zandt5, S.R. McNutt6, J. Gottsmann2, M.E. West7, J. Blundy2, D.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Arc Dacite Genesis Pathways: Evidence from Mafic Enclaves and Their Hosts in Aegean Lavas ⁎ G.F
    Lithos 95 (2007) 346–362 www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos Arc dacite genesis pathways: Evidence from mafic enclaves and their hosts in Aegean lavas ⁎ G.F. Zellmer a,b, , S.P. Turner c a Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan, ROC b Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, New York 10964, USA c GEMOC, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Received 4 January 2006; accepted 17 August 2006 Available online 25 September 2006 Abstract Mafic enclaves are commonly found in intermediate arc magmas, and their occurrence has been linked to eruption triggering by pre-eruptive magma mixing processes. New major, trace, Sr–Nd and U–Th isotope data of rocks from Nisyros in the Aegean volcanic arc are presented here. Pre-caldera samples display major and trace element trends that are consistent with fractionation of magnetite and apatite within intermediate compositions, and zircon within felsic compositions, and preclude extensive hybrid- ization between mafic and felsic magmas. In contrast, post-caldera dacites form a mixing trend towards their mafic enclaves. In terms of U-series isotopes, most samples show small 238U excesses of up to ∼10%. Mafic enclaves have significantly higher U/Th ratios than their dacitic host lavas, precluding simple models that relate the mafic and felsic magmas by fractionation or aging alone. A more complicated petrogenetic scenario is required. The post-caldera dacites are interpreted to represent material remobilized from a young igneous protolith following influx of fresh mafic magma, consistent with the U–Th data and with Sr–Nd isotope constraints that point to very limited (b10%) assimilation of old crust at Nisyros.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Island Arc of Japan and the Formation of Granites in the Circum-Pacific Belt
    JOURNALOF GEOMAGNETISMAND GEOELECTRICITY VOL. 23, No. 3, 4, 1971 The Evolution of the Island Arc of Japan and the Formation of Granites in the Circum-Pacific Belt Naoto KAWAI, Tadashi NAKAJIMA and Kimio HIROOKa+ Department of Material Physics, Faculty of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan (Received April 27, 1971) Abstract From a palaeomagnetic study and radiometric investigation of Cretaceous intrusive rocks it was recently suggested that the Palaeozoic basin formed in the northeastern Japan was severely deformed at the end of Mesozoic era. This resulted in a narrowing and shortening of the entire length of the Japanese islands. The northeastern block moved southwestward by approximately 200km and southwestern northeastward by 150km, whereas the middle block remained relative- ly unmoved but was compressed between the two blocks. As the compressional forces increased, first the Palaeozoic sediments of the central block were uplifted, and subsequently the "median line" was formed. Along the latter line, the northern half of the southern block moved eastward relative to the southern half. A strong uniaxial stress superimposed upon a hydrostatic one oc- curred associated with the relative movement. The sediments as the results recrystallized to form the three major metamorphic belts. During and after these movements, the compressed zone in the middle of the island was push- ed to the east to form a great warp in the island. Such a simple model of a bend accompanied by a tension crack as predicted by Kawai, Ito and Kume several years ago was reconsidered. The contraction of the basin was finally related to the eastward drift of Asian continent upon the Creta- ceous Pacific sea floor.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.16 Oceanic Plateaus A.C.Kerr Cardiffuniversity,Wales,UK
    3.16 Oceanic Plateaus A.C.Kerr CardiffUniversity,Wales,UK 3.16.1 INTRODUCTION 537 3.16.2 FORMATION OF OCEANIC PLATEAUS 539 3.16.3 PRESERVATIONOFOCEANIC PLATEAUS 540 3.16.4GEOCHEMISTRY OF CRETACEOUSOCEANICPLATEAUS 540 3.16.4.1 GeneralChemicalCharacteristics 540 3.16.4.2 MantlePlumeSource Regions ofOceanic Plateaus 541 3.16.4.3 Caribbean–ColombianOceanic Plateau(, 90 Ma) 544 3.16.4.4OntongJavaPlateau(, 122 and , 90 Ma) 548 3.16.5THE INFLUENCE OF CONTINENTALCRUST ON OCEANIC PLATEAUS 549 3.16.5.1 The NorthAtlantic Igneous Province ( , 60 Ma to Present Day) 549 3.16.5.2 The KerguelenIgneous Province ( , 133 Ma to Present Day) 550 3.16.6 IDENTIFICATION OF OCEANIC PLATEAUS IN THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 551 3.16.6.1 Diagnostic FeaturesofOceanic Plateaus 552 3.16.6.2 Mafic Triassic Accreted Terranesinthe NorthAmericanCordillera 553 3.16.6.3 Carboniferous to CretaceousAccreted Oceanic Plateaus inJapan 554 3.16.7 PRECAMBRIAN OCEANICPLATEAUS 556 3.16.8ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF OCEANICPLATEAU FORMATION557 3.16.8.1 Cenomanian–TuronianBoundary (CTB)Extinction Event 558 3.16.8.2 LinksbetweenCTB Oceanic PlateauVolcanism andEnvironmentalPerturbation 558 3.16.9 CONCLUDING STATEMENTS 560 REFERENCES 561 3.16.1 INTRODUCTION knowledge ofthe oceanbasins hasimproved over the last 25years,many moreoceanic plateaus Although the existence oflarge continentalflood havebeenidentified (Figure1).Coffinand basalt provinceshasbeenknownfor some Eldholm (1992) introduced the term “large igneous considerabletime, e.g.,Holmes(1918),the provinces” (LIPs) asageneric term encompassing recognition thatsimilarfloodbasalt provinces oceanic plateaus,continentalfloodbasalt alsoexist belowthe oceans isrelatively recent. In provinces,andthoseprovinceswhich form at the early 1970s increasingamounts ofevidence the continent–oceanboundary (volcanic rifted fromseismic reflection andrefraction studies margins).
    [Show full text]
  • Geometrical Effects of a Subducted Seamount on Stopping Megathrust
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 40, 1–6, doi:10.1002/grl.50509, 2013 Geometrical effects of a subducted seamount on stopping megathrust ruptures Hongfeng Yang,1,2 Yajing Liu,1,3 and Jian Lin1 Received 6 March 2013; revised 18 April 2013; accepted 25 April 2013. [1] We have numerically simulated dynamic ruptures along rich sediments into seismogenic zone [Bangs et al., 2006]. a “slip-weakening” megathrust fault with a subducted The presence of entrained fluid-rich sediments in the vicinity seamount of realistic geometry, demonstrating that of a subducted seamount would reduce effective normal seamounts can act as a barrier to earthquake ruptures. Such stress and lubricate the thrust interface, leading to little barrier effect is calculated to be stronger for increased elastic strain accumulation and thus inhibiting coseismic seamount normal stress relative to the ambient level, for ruptures [Mochizuki et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2011]. Further- larger seamount height-to-width ratio, and for shorter more, it was proposed that seamount subduction may create seamount-to-nucleation distance. As the seamount height a complex fracture network in the overriding plate, making it increases from 0 to 40% of its basal width, the required unfavorable for the generation of large earthquakes [Wang increase in the effective normal stress on the seamount to and Bilek, 2011]. Thus, the specific mechanisms for stop ruptures drops by as much as ~20%. We further subducted seamounts to stop coseismic ruptures could be demonstrate that when a seamount is subducted adjacent to complex and remain open for debate. the earthquake nucleation zone, coseismic ruptures can be [3] Previous numerical studies have modeled a subducted stopped even if the seamount has a lower effective normal seamount as a patch under elevated effective normal stress stress than the ambient level.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Submarine Arc Volcanoes Steven Carey University of Rhode Island, [email protected]
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Graduate School of Oceanography Faculty Graduate School of Oceanography Publications 2007 Exploring Submarine Arc Volcanoes Steven Carey University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Haraldur Sigurdsson University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/gsofacpubs Terms of Use All rights reserved under copyright. Citation/Publisher Attribution Carey, S., and H. Sigurdsson. 2007. Exploring submarine arc volcanoes. Oceanography 20(4):80–89, https://doi.org/10.5670/ oceanog.2007.08. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.08 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School of Oceanography at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate School of Oceanography Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This article has This been published in or collective redistirbution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The approval portionthe ofwith any permitted articleonly photocopy by is of machine, reposting, this means or collective or other redistirbution SP ec I A L Iss U E On Ocean E X P L O R ATIO N Oceanography , Volume 20, Number 4, a quarterly journal of The 20, Number 4, a quarterly , Volume O ceanography Society. Copyright 2007 by The 2007 by Copyright Society. ceanography Exploring O ceanography Society. All rights All reserved. Society. ceanography O Submarine Arc Volcanoes or Th e [email protected] Send Society. ceanography to: correspondence all B Y S T even C A R E Y an D H A R A LDUR SIGURD ss O N Three quarters of Earth’s volcanic activ- although a significant part of arc volca- tion of tsunamis (Latter, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Viscous Volcanos 2016 Grades 6-8 (Earth Science)
    2016 Deepwater Exploration of the Marianas Viscous Volcanoes Focus Serpentine mud volcanoes Grade Level 6-8 (Earth Science) Focus Question What are serpentine mud volcanoes and how are they different from magma volcanoes? Learning Objectives • Students will describe mud volcanoes, contrast them with magma volcanoes, and explain how these structures, the Mariana Islands, and the Mariana Trench are related to the motion of tectonic plates. Materials For each serpentine mud volcano model: q Plastic tubing, approximately 1/4” outer diameter, 1/8” inside diameter q 2-liter plastic soda bottle q Fast-setting epoxy glue q Air-cure modeling clay, approximately 500 ml q Fine sand, table salt, or finely ground coffee q Drill and drill bit to match outside diameter of plastic tubing For each sediment-derived mud volcano model: q 2-liter plastic soda bottle q Cardboard or acrylic disk, diameter slightly smaller than soda bottle diameter q Fine sand or clay q Drill and drill bits, 3/8” and 1/2” For each magma volcano model: q Modeling materials, depending upon techniques chosen (see Learning Procedure, Step 1d and Step 4. Image captions/credits on Page 2. Audio-Visual Materials q (Optional) Interactive whiteboard Teaching Time If you need assistance with this document, please contact NOAA 1 Two or three 45-minute class periods Fisheries at (808) 725-5000. www.oceanexplorer.noaa.gov Viscous Volcanos 2016 Grades 6-8 (Earth Science) Seating Arrangement Groups of two to four students Maximum Number of Students 30 Key Words Mariana Arc Serpentine Mud volcano Mariana Trench Magma volcano Tectonic plate Images from Page 1 top to bottom: This Google Earth map shows the operating area of the 2016 Deepwater Background Information Exploration of the Marianas Expedition.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Sedimentary Characteristics of Tsunami Deposits
    Sedimentary Geology 200 (2007) 372–386 www.elsevier.com/locate/sedgeo Distribution and sedimentary characteristics of tsunami deposits along the Cascadia margin of western North America ⁎ Robert Peters a, , Bruce Jaffe a, Guy Gelfenbaum b a USGS Pacific Science Center, 400 Natural Bridges Drive, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, United States b USGS 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States Abstract Tsunami deposits have been found at more than 60 sites along the Cascadia margin of Western North America, and here we review and synthesize their distribution and sedimentary characteristics based on the published record. Cascadia tsunami deposits are best preserved, and most easily identified, in low-energy coastal environments such as tidal marshes, back-barrier marshes and coastal lakes where they occur as anomalous layers of sand within peat and mud. They extend up to a kilometer inland in open coastal settings and several kilometers up river valleys. They are distinguished from other sediments by a combination of sedimentary character and stratigraphic context. Recurrence intervals range from 300–1000 years with an average of 500–600 years. The tsunami deposits have been used to help evaluate and mitigate tsunami hazards in Cascadia. They show that the Cascadia subduction zone is prone to great earthquakes that generate large tsunamis. The inclusion of tsunami deposits on inundation maps, used in conjunction with results from inundation models, allows a more accurate assessment of areas subject to tsunami inundation. The application of sediment transport models can help estimate tsunami flow velocity and wave height, parameters which are necessary to help establish evacuation routes and plan development in tsunami prone areas.
    [Show full text]