DOCSLIB.ORG

Animal Right: an Essencial for Balance in Human Society Satyendra Gupta, Professor & Principal, Department of Education, Galgotias University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Animal Right: an Essencial for Balance in Human Society Satyendra Gupta, Professor & Principal, Department of Education, Galgotias University © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Animal Right: An Essencial for Balance in Human Society Satyendra Gupta, Professor & Principal, Department of Education, Galgotias University Abstract For Centuries, thinkers have debated the relationship between humans and animals. The current debate on in many aspects of modern life today. Some people believe that adopting a vegetarian is the only ethical. Animal rights advocates believe that animals have legal rights and are members of the moral community. As a consequence, mankind should not exploit animals for any reason. Animal rights advocates think that animals should be treated compassionately and without undue suffering. More Than 150 Billion Animals are Slaughtered Every Year. Key words: Animal abuse, cruelty and neglect,Animal Rights, Role of PETA Introduction Every day, animal cruelty cases make headlines worldwide, whether it is the person who kills the family dog, the hoarder of sick and dying animals, or the family whose freezing, a starving dog is chained outside in the dead of winter. Animal Cruelty can also be done by Simple Negligence, Gross Disregard, Intentional Abuse, Animal Hoarding, Organized Abuse, or Ritualistic Abuse. These incidents of maltreatment cannot be overlooked because these practices inflict immense agony on these animals and till now demonstrated to have serious repercussions ranging from the fact. Combating animal cruelty is a journey that everyone, including the government, non-governmental entities, and even cultural institutions, must embark on. As per an analysis of data of animal cruelty incidents reported on the NIBRS and FBI websites in 2017 and 2016, the FBI categorizes animal cruelty into four categories, which are listed here: 1. simple/gross neglect 2. intentional abuse and torture 3. organized abuse/animal fighting 4. and animal sexual abuse. In 2017, there were 3,228 reports of animal cruelty from 29 states that a significant increase over the 2016 total of 1,126. Likely, the rise in the number of animal cruelty incidents does not indicate that more animal cruelty occurred in 2017 and 2016 than in previous years, but rather that more juries were involved. What is Animal Cruelty - Animal Cruelty does have a legal definition as well (Duel, 2000). These conflicting conceptions of animal cruelty have generated a problem since the beginning of the animal-protection movement. - Although tremendous progress has been made for animals in our community, particularly in the last 50 years, the ongoing absence of a widely accepted definition of animal cruelty remains a significant impediment. JETIR1811C35 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 884 © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) - Every act that endangers the well-being of animals and has not previously been addressed by-laws must be challenged and conquered on a case-by-case basis. - Animal Cruelty is defined by how much an animal suffers or feels Pain during its death; the degree of suffering is unimportant to animal rights activists since the animals the right to exist free of human consumption and Cruelty. - Every year, 10 million animals die as a result of Cruelty. In addition, we know that 100 million animals are exploited in exploratory studies. However, since not all abuse cases are recorded, we may reasonably estimate that more than 100 million animals are mistreated each year. - Animal abuse is wrong because animals can die, have many problems, and be affected for the rest of their lives. They should not have to suffer every day. Animal abuse is cruel, should not be done, and is a heinous act of violence to commit. How can we save animals from Cruelty? - Ways to Put a Stop to Animal Cruelty - Adopt a Dog or a Cat. Annually, the Humane society saves over 100,000 animals. - Take care of pets - Donate to Animal Rescue Organizations. - Start Teaching children Animal Compassion - Buy Humane Animal Products. Stop Littering and Reduce Plastic Consumption. Importance of Animal Rights - Animal welfare is essential because many animals die worldwidedue to its exploitation for amusement, nutrition, healthcare, aesthetics, scientific advancement, and companion animals. Each animal deserves a good life in that it can have fearless life. - Specifically, killing an animal for fur or cosmetology testing is unethical, although slaughtering animals for consumption is permissible. - Animal rights advocates believe animals shouldbe raised compassionately and without undue suffering andshould not makethem available to people for nutrition, garments, research, and pleasure. - The animal rights movement is the only social movement that advocates the l for animal protection laws - Freedom from Starvation – Animals should get clean drinking water and a meal to preserve their whole health and energy. - - Freedom from Pain – We must providing an adequate environment, including shelter and a pleasant resting spot. - - Freedom from Hurt, Trauma, or Infection - People who domesticate then and afterward leave them on open streets must look for the prevention or early diagnosis and treatment. JETIR1811C35 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 885 © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) - ORGANIZATIONS WORKING FOR THE ANIMAL RIGHTS MOVEMENT Thousands of animal rights activists work to protect these creatures all around the world. Here are some of the most well-known animal rights organizations. The majority are non-profit, but others appear to be for-profit since we have linked some of them back to infinite accounting. 1. ANIMAL AID A British organization, formed in 1977. They strive to bring an end to animal cruelty. They have campaigned to encourage a lifestyle in which animals are not abused. They expose animal cruelty and seek justice for them 2. CRUELTY-FREE INTERNATIONAL This organization aims to abolish all forms of animal research. They are opposed to usingcats, dogs, and other animals in research. This organization was founded almost a century ago and is battling to prevent animal abuse. 3. UNCAGED CAMPAIGNS An organization that prevents animal research and testing. They primarily advocate against xenotransplantation, or transplants involving both animals and humans. They are protesting animal experimentation by firms such as Procter & Gamble. 4. THE HUMANE SOCIETY - THE UNITED STATES (HSUS) Because of people's lifestyles, there is a high demand for animals. They require leather items, shellfish, and other animal-derived products. The illicit wildlife trade has such a large profit margin. In many places, pets and farm animals are also abused. Many nations still lack adequate judicial mechanisms to safeguard animal rights. These groups extend their wings in various ways. 5. THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) PETA is a well-known animal rights movement. It has about 2 million users worldwide and operates in ten countries. Every year, the charity receives more than $30 million to safeguard animal rights. Several celebrities are involved in their different initiatives. It's reasonable to be terrified if you're in the presence of a dangerous animal. The essential thing to remember is to make sure the animal isn't aware of the fear. If you become nervous, take deep breaths and relax. Ensure you're not displaying any fear-related emotions, such as trembling, yelling, shaking, fleeing, or sobbing. Conventional Approach - Animal sacrifice is regularly practiced in traditional countries; worldwide, we slaughter animals for the welfare of society or the betterment of their loved ones. There are religious occasions when animals get slaughter and enjoyed as the festival meal. - The animal is sacrificed as food rather than for any obscure mystical purpose. Followers of an Orisha will offer them food and sacrifice animals to build and maintain a personal relationship with the spirit. JETIR1811C35 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 886 © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) - - Some Hindu temples in India's Assam and West Bengal states and IN Nepal sacrifice goats and chickens. Water buffalos are also offered on occasion. Sacrifices are usually made in temples that follow the Shakti school of Hinduism. This form of sacrifice is done in several Tamil Nadu village temple complexes. During the three-day Gadhimai festival, several animals are sacrificed. - On the one hand, the primary purpose of blood sacrifice could range from offering a gift, having communion, making propitiation, cleansing, averting evils or failures, and providing nourishment for Yahweh, to providing food for man. - A religious Practicein which an object is offered to a divinity establishes maintains, or restores a human being's proper relationship to the holy order. It is a phenomenon that has been uncovered in all regions of the world and the earliest known forms of worship. - How can we stop animal sacrifices? Religious festivals should indeed be witnessed in a nonviolent and sensitive manner. One can help the poor by distributing vegan food, sending clothes or toys to orphanages, volunteering at animal shelters, or putting out clean water bowls for homeless animals in the community. Is animal sacrifice legal in India? We have been fighting this horrible brutality for many years, which violates the Andhra Pradesh Birds and Animals Sacrifice Act 1950, which specifies that sacrificing any animal or bird for religious worship is prohibited; section 2, 3, 4, and 5. Why should we stop animal sacrifice? Animal sacrifice is harmful to everyone because it legitimizes killing and desensitizes youngsters to animal brutality. Furthermore, how executioners handle, transport, and kill animals for sacrifices frequently violates animal carriage and slaughter laws, making it an illegal violation. What religions still sacrifice animals? Traditional African and Afro-Americans and many other countries often practice animal sacrifice for religious purposes. The United States Supre Court gave a verdicton animal slaughter, which must be prohibited.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2
    AAnniimmaallss LLiibbeerraattiioonn PPhhiilloossoopphhyy aanndd PPoolliiccyy JJoouurrnnaall VVoolluummee 55,, IIssssuuee 22 -- 22000077 Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2 2007 Edited By: Steven Best, Chief Editor ____________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell Pg. 2-28 Jewish Ethics and Nonhuman Animals Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 29-47 Deliberative Democracy, Direct Action, and Animal Advocacy Stephen D’Arcy Pg. 48-63 Should Anti-Vivisectionists Boycott Animal-Tested Medicines? Katherine Perlo Pg. 64-78 A Note on Pedagogy: Humane Education Making a Difference Piers Bierne and Meena Alagappan Pg. 79-94 BOOK REVIEWS _________________ Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, by Eric Schlosser (2005) Reviewed by Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 95-101 Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust, by Charles Patterson (2002) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 102-118 The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA, by Norm Phelps (2007) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 119-130 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume V, Issue 2, 2007 Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell, PhD It is difficult to be sat on all day, every day, by some other creature, without forming an opinion about them. On the other hand, it is perfectly possible to sit all day every day, on top of another creature and not have the slightest thought about them whatsoever. -- Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency (1988) Committed to the idea that the lives of humans and animals are inextricably linked, Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (1828–1910) promoted—through literature, essays, and letters—the animal world as another venue in which to practice concern and kindness, consequently leading to more peaceful, consonant human relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Events Helping Us Reduce Our Hinsa Footprints
    EVENTS HELPING US REDUCE OUR HINSA FOOTPRINTS www.jainvegans.org DATE EVENT, VENUE & ADMISSION FURTHER INFORMATION CALENDAR OF EVENTS (WORLDWIDE) March Veggie Month www.veggiemonth.com National, UK (website produced by Animal Aid: www.animalaid.org.uk) “There are many reasons to go veggie including animal welfare, health, www.veggiemonth.com environmental protection and cost. If you are concerned about one or more of these issues, why not take the opportunity to try some more Various free food and information stalls meat-free meals during March” organised by Animal Aid. “If you are already veggie... go vegan!” 5th March School Speakers' Workshop for Organisers: Animal Aid (www.animalaid.org.uk) (Saturday) Secondary School Talks “Informing and empowering young people is one of the best ways to create a Manchester, UK. cruelty-free future. You can help by joining Animal Aid’s school speaker network. We are asked to provide speakers by Religious Education, English, Food Technology, PSE, Citizenship and General Studies teachers. 10am-4:30pm “We will provide free training and information to help you get up to speed and then provide videos to show and free resources to give to the students so they can find Advance registration required – see weblink and out more. You can fit in as many or as few talks as you wish and we’re sure that contact details opposite, you’ll find the experience rewarding.” Free to attend but £5 deposit required on booking, which will be returned upon attendance. To find out more, visit: www.animalaid.org.uk/h/n/ACTIVE/school_speaker/ALL/// or contact Mark White (tel: 01732 364546 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Ar Calendar.P65
    May 2012 Animal Rights Calendar Sat 12th . West Lancashire Vegan Fair Sat 12th . Global Boycott Procter & Gamble Day (TBC). Uncaged www.veggies.org.uk/arc.htm Sat 19th . Meat Free in Manchester : Vegetarian Society Sat 19th . Hugletts Wood Farm Animal Sanctuary Open Day Sun 20th . Horse and Pony Sanctuary Open Day March 2012 : Veggie Month : Animal Aid Mon 21st - Sun 27th . National Vegetarian Week Mon 5th . Sheffield Animal Friends meeting Fri 25th - Sun 27th . Bristol VegFestUK Mon 5th . Manchester Animal Action! 1st Monday monthly Sun 27th . GM Action Tue 6th . South East Animal Rights meeting. First Tuesday of each month. Tue 6th . Merseyside Animal Rights meeting. First Tuesday monthly June 2012 Sun 10th . Animals in Need Sponsored Walk Wed 7th . Live Exports - Ramsgate (every week) : Kent Action Against Live Exports (KAALE) Sun 10th . Nottingham Green Festival (T.B.C) Wed 7th . Derby Animal Rights. Every two weeks. Tue 19th . McLibel: Anniversary Day of Action Wed 7th . Southsea Animal Action meeting. First Wednesday monthly Wed 7th . Ethical Voice for Animals meeting. First Wednesday monthly July 2012 Wed 7th . Southampton Animal Action. First Wednesday monthly Thur 5th . Mel Broughton's Birthday : Vegan Prisoner Support Group Thur 8th . Nottingham Animal Rights Networking. Every two weeks Sat 7th . Animal Aid Sponsored Walk Fri 13th - Sun 15th . International Animal Rights Gathering, Poland Sat 10th . Demo against proposed cull Lake Windermere Canada Geese Mon 12th . Bath Animal Action / Hunt Sabs. 2nd Monday monthly August 2012 Wed 14th . Bournemouth Animal Aid Meeting. 2nd Wednesday monthly Wed 1st - Mon 6th . EF Summer Gathering, Shrewsbury Wed 14th . Taunton Vegans & Veggies.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Law Subject Proposal
    April 2006 ANIMAL LAW SUBJECT PROPOSAL Background Until recently, Animal Law has been overlooked by Australian law schools in determining their curricula. It is not, however, a ‘novel’ concept. In the United States sixty law schools teach Animal Law, including Harvard. In that jurisdiction Animal Law is not only a highly developed area of jurisprudence (e.g. a google search on ‘animal law’ returns approximately 116,000,000 hits; there is a dedicated Institute of Animal Law, Animal Law journals and specialist Animal Law firms) – but it also has a great deal of practical significance. By way of example of the practical significance of Animal Law, and how Animal Law can be utilised by lawyers, consider the work undertaken by the US organization, the Animal Legal Defence Fund (‘ALDF’). This was established in 1979 and has more than 100,000 dedicated lawyer members who apply their skills in a number of ways in order to protect the lives and advance the interests of animals through the legal system. For instance, the ‘Litigation Program’ files cutting-edge lawsuits to stop the abuse of companion animals, and animals abused in industries including factory farming and the entertainment business; while the ‘Criminal Justice Program’ works with law enforcement and prosecutors to seek maximum penalties for animal abusers. ALDF has also been at the forefront of law reform in respect of stronger enforcement of anti-cruelty laws and more humane treatment of animals. In addition to the above work, those with skills and knowledge in the area of Animal Law could also apply it to work in other specific areas of law, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Shopping Guide to Cat and Dog Food
    THANK YOU FOR DOWNLOADING THIS ETHICAL CONSUMER RESEARCH REPORT. It contains a buyers’ guide complete with: • a detailed article • rankings table • Best Buy advice • all the stories behind the marks on the table • company ownership and contact details • full list of references £4.25 EC121 November/December 2009 www.ethicalconsumer.org Subscribe to Ethical Consumer and get instant access to over 80 similar reports (worth over £240) as part of your subscription. Subscribers also get: Revealing the dark heart Ethical Consumer magazine of the chocolate industry – play fair, not dirty Toys & games consoles – cutting the environmental costs - keeping you up to date with all the latest ethical news and analysis Razors & shavers Rating • Unique buyers’ guides with detailed ratings tables, Best Buys advice, (out of 20) Brand 17 company profiles, news, boycotts, comment and more Equal Exchange tea 17 [F,O] 17 Online back issues archive HampsteadCo tea Tea [F,O] & Coffee • 17 Purely Organic tea [F,O] Steenbergs English • Available in print through the post or as a digital download breakfast tea [F,O] Unlimited, 24 hour access to our premium website ethiscore.org been a contributor to carbon emissions which had a damaging effect on the environment. (ref: 3) or dolphin No palm oil policy Sustainable(July 2009) forestry policy (2008) contacted, 123 had a dmitted to selling whale and/ A search was madeWal-Mart of the Walmart did not website respond (www.walmartstores. to a request by ECRA in Ocober 2008 meat. It said Sea Shepherd had been urging its members and the com) on 8th July 2009.for the No company’s policy on popalmlicy oil on could the sustainable be found.
    [Show full text]
  • CCS Grant Report
    CCS Grant Report This report was submitted in fulfilment of a research grant received from the Centre for Civil Society, University of KwaZulu Natal. The Centre for Civil Society Grant Programme was established in 2002 to support research on Civil Society issues in South Africa. It is funded by the Atlantic Philanthropies. CCS Grant Reports are distinct from CCS Research Reports in that Research reports have gone through a peer review process. Grant reports simply make available the report as provided by the author. In effect they are working papers, and comments can be sent directly to the author. For more information on CCS please visit http://www.ukzn.ac.za/ccs/ Also see: Pickover, Michelle (2005) Animal Rights in South Africa, published by Double Storey 1 THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA: AN ANALYSIS OF ANIMAL-BASED ISSUES, CAMPAIGNS AND ORGANISATIONS GRANT REPORT BY MICHELE PICKOVER FOR THE CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY AUGUST 2003 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1......................................................................................................................................................................................8 PURVEYORS, PARTAKERS AND PAWNS: FARMING ANIMALS FOR FOOD ..............................................................8 NOT QUITE REVOLUTIONARY ENOUGH ........................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    In a collapsed state Executive Summary This report addresses the “Imutran xenotransplantation research” memorandum submitted by the Home Office to the Home Affairs Committee in October 2003. Background In April 2003, Uncaged Campaigns, together with its director, Mr Dan Lyons, published over a thousand pages of confidential documents contained in two leaks from Imutran Ltd (spring 2000) and the Home Office (October 2002), together with the report written by Mr Lyons based on those documents. The documents described the conduct and regulation of pig-to-primate organ transplant experiments, conducted at Huntingdon Life Sciences between 1995 and 2000. The report was entitled ‘Diaries of Despair’ in recognition of harrowing clinical observations made by the researchers as hundreds of non-human primates suffered and died following the pig organ transplant procedures. This publication took place following an extremely difficult two-and-a-half-year legal battle. Imutran (later joined by their parent company, the multinational pharmaceutical corporation Novartis Pharma AG) had applied to the High Court in September 2000 for a permanent and complete injunction suppressing publication of the leaked documents on the grounds of breach of confidentiality and copyright. The claim did not include any accusation of libel on the part of Uncaged and Mr Lyons, despite the strong criticism of Imutran contained in the ‘Diaries of Despair’ report. Significantly, the Home Office declined the opportunity to apply to the court to try to prevent disclosure of its confidential documents. Uncaged and Mr Lyons successfully argued that the documents revealed breaches of legislation on the part of Imutran, and official misconduct on the part of the Home Office in its implementation of animal research regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society
    Proceedings of the Conference Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society held at the University of Exeter, UK 10 March 2012 © CPAS convenors, editors and individual named contributors, 2013 Some rights reserved Copyright in contributions to these proceedings rests with their respective authors. Copyright to the overall collection and arrangement and to any other material in this document rests with the convenors of CPAS and the editors of its proceedings. In the spirit of open-access publishing and with a commitment to the intellectual commons, reuse and distribution of these proceedings for non-commercial purposes is permitted and encouraged, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution± NonCommercial±NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales licence, which can be read at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/ Amongst other things, this licence requires that you attribute material you reproduce to its author, and make clear to those you share it with that they too may reproduce it under the terms of the licence. Anything outside the licence, especially commercial use, requires the express permission of the editors and conference convenors, or of individual authors. Requests to the former should be directed to: [email protected] Edited by Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling Contents Introduction by the editors 5 Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling — Contributions in brief — About CPAS — Acknowledgements — Conference programme Campaigning techniques 11 Keynote address by Dr Richard D. Ryder Animal rights: moral crusade or social
    [Show full text]
  • Guilty Government
    Guilty Government 1. Introduction: Political brutality 2. Bypassing democracy 3. Toothless regulation 4. Turning a blind eye 5. Government cover-up a. Stonewall b. The Chief Inspector’s review c. The Animal Procedures Committee d. The New Documents 1. Introduction: Political brutality The disturbing story of Government malpractice that is revealed by the Diaries of Despair scandal teaches us a sobering political lesson. Behind a wall of confidentiality, the Government has succumbed to the improper advances of big business and the scientific ‘old guard’: together they ride roughshod over democracy, the public interest, the rule of law, and the welfare and rights of animals. However, the Diaries of Despair affair is the most extreme and well-documented example of a deeper pattern of Government misconduct. Thanks to Uncaged Campaigns’ and Dan Lyons’ legal victory, such abuses, once exposed, can be remedied. This section begins with reference to the regulatory framework for animal experiments in the UK, revealing how democratic processes are bypassed [LINK to 2.]. The stark contradiction between the letter of the law and the spirit of the Government’s enforcement results in toothless regulation. The troubling record of the Government turning a blind eye to evidence of cruelty and malpractice is then presented. Looking at the Government’s desperate reaction to the Conflict of interest Diaries of Despair exposé, we find the entrenchment of an “Furthermore, the Imutran arrogant, and callous policy. Furthermore, a letter from research was personally junior minister Angela Eagle dated 14 December 2001 authorised by the ministers reveals that the Imutran research was personally authorised who were now blocking an by the ministers who were now blocking an investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Battle
    The Legal Battle 1. Introduction – justified exposure of a horrific scandal 2. The public interest (i) Primate suffering (ii) Virus risk (iii) Home Office misconduct (a) Deliberate underestimation of animal suffering (b) ‘Rubber stamping’: the Inspectorate’s private view of the regulatory framework (c) Direct concealment of regulatory violations from Parliament and public (d) Covering-up for Huntingdon Life Sciences (e) Breaches of absolute legal limits on suffering (f) The cost/benefit assessment (iv) Imutran inaccuracies (a) Hyping xenotransplantation (b) Secret suffering (v) Illegal severe suffering? 3. Chronology of legal battle 1. Introduction Justified exposure of a horrific scandal Five days after the original disclosure of the Diaries of Despair on 21 September 2000, Imutran Ltd obtained a temporary injunction from the High Court in London banning the publication of the report and the entire haul of leaked documents. The injunction did allow the documents to be disclosed to specified Government bodies. Imutran had claimed that the Defendants, Uncaged Campaigns Ltd and Dan Lyons (director of Uncaged Campaigns and author of the Diaries of Despair report) had: • used and disclosed confidential information; and The importance of freedom of expression • infringed the copyright in those documents which “Modern democratic government means they claimed were copyright documents government of the people by the people for the people. But there can be no government by the Imutran’s action was not based on denials of the truth of our people if they are ignorant of the issues to be resolved, the arguments for and against allegations and conclusions, but was founded exclusively on different solutions and the facts underlying breach of confidentiality and copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Cost-Benefit Assessment in the Use of Animals in Research
    ANIMAL PROCEDURES COMMITTEE REVIEW OF COST-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT IN THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH JUNE 2003 REPORT OF THE COST-BENEFIT WORKING GROUP OF THE ANIMAL PROCEDURES COMMITTEE PREFACE Letter to the Minister from Michael Banner, Chair of the Animal Procedures Committee 17 June 2003 Dear Ms Flint ANIMAL PROCEDURES COMMITTEE: RECOMMENDATIONS ON COST-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT UNDER THE ANIMALS (SCIENTIFIC PROCEDURES) ACT 1986 On behalf of the Animal Procedures Committee I enclose the Committee’s report on cost-benefit assessment. In it we address the adequacy of the current cost-benefit assessment performed in the course of evaluating project licence applications. We have sought to look at the many issues which arise in relation to this important element of the regulation of the use of animals, but would draw attention to three particular aspects of our work. In the first place we have addressed the fundamental question as to scientific validity of the use of animals. We believe that our considerations and conclusions offer an important clarification of the debate and fulfil the request made by your predecessor, Mike O’Brien, to provide advice on this issue. Secondly, while we conclude that some uses of animals may yield scientific knowledge, we argue that this does not settle the question of justification. We go on to elucidate the full range of factors which must be considered for there to be a rigorous application of the cost-benefit assessment. Thirdly, we also consider how the practice and process of cost-benefit assessment can be enhanced so that it can be, and be seen to be, critical and comprehensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition 106 – Sept 2005
    AAHR NEWS 106 September 2005 Patron: Professor John Coetzee AIMS OF THE AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATION FOR HUMANE RESEARCH INC. • To promote all viable methods of healing which do not at any stage involve the use of animals. • To promote the use of scientific alternatives in all forms of medical, scientific and commercial research. • To help disseminate evidence, as it becomes available, that the use of alternatives is less costly, more accurate and more humane than the use of animals in experiments. • To work for the abolition of all experiments using animals. Hello and welcome to our new-look newsletter. I hope that you’ll find it reader-friendly, but that it still contains vital and credible information for which past newsletters have become renowned. Now that AAHR is established in Melbourne we are starting to get out and about. In July I spoke at Monash University’s Students of Sustainability conference, and will shortly address BOAR (Ballarat Organisation for Animal Rights). We urge all our Victorian members to come along We are also about to participate in the Cruelty Free Expo, and see the Cruelty Free Lifestyle Expo. and World Vegan Day picnic. It’s so great to have the opportunity to speak to people directly about the danger and All-Vegan Expo. Food, cosmetics, household the injustice of animal research. It also provides the products, toiletries, organic products, live music, opportunity to address people’s concerns and also to gauge workshops, cooking demos, literature, massage, their reactions and interest in the issue. devonshire tea, wine, beer and a delicious lunch.
    [Show full text]