DOCSLIB.ORG

Masshighway Bicycle Transportation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Masshighway Bicycle Transportation Plan MASSACHUSETTS BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Prepared for Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation Prepared by Planners Collaborative, Inc. With assistance from TranSystems Corporation National Center for Bicycling and Walking Rubel Bike Maps Alan McLennan September 2008 Note to Reader The document you are viewing contains links to the graphics from the final report for easier downloading. A complete version of the report is available from the EOT website. Table of Contents Dedication ..................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................ix 1 Introduction........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Vision for Sustainable Bicycle Transportation ....................................................... 1 1.2 The Commonwealth’s Role in Bicycle Transportation.......................................... 1 1.3 Investing to Improve Bicycle Transportation.......................................................... 3 1.4 Organization of the Plan.............................................................................................. 3 2 The Context for the Plan .................................................................................. 1 2.1 The Massachusetts Long‐Range State Transportation Plan and the Strategic Transportation Plan...................................................................................................... 1 2.2 1998 Massachusetts Statewide Bicycle Transportation Plan................................. 1 2.3 MassHighway Initiatives to Improve Bicycling Conditions ................................ 2 2.3.1 Engineering Directives and Guidelines............................................................... 2 2.3.2 MassHighway’s Project Development and Design Guide................................ 3 2.4 Other Commonwealth Planning Efforts................................................................... 4 2.4.1 Transit‐Oriented Development............................................................................. 4 2.4.2 DCR’s Commonwealth Connections............................................................... 4 2.4.3 MassHighway Bicycle Facilities Inventory..................................................... 5 2.4.4 Regional and Local Planning Efforts ............................................................... 5 2.4.5 Adjacent States’ Bicycle Facilities and Programs........................................... 6 2.5 Public Outreach in Support of the Plan.................................................................... 7 3 Bicycle Facility Resources and Opportunities ............................................. 1 3.1 Bicycle Facility Types................................................................................................... 1 3.1.1 On‐Road Bicycle Facilities ..................................................................................... 1 3.1.2 Long Distance Bicycle Routes ............................................................................... 2 3.1.3 Shared Use Paths .................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Bicycle Facility Resources............................................................................................ 4 3.2.1 Major Shared Use Path Resources in Massachusetts......................................... 4 3.3 Funded Bicycle Projects ............................................................................................. 12 3.4 Congressionally Funded Bicycle Projects............................................................... 14 4 The Proposed Bay State Greenway (BSG).................................................. 18 4.1 Why a Statewide Bicycle Network?......................................................................... 18 4.1.1 Massachusetts is Bicycle Friendly ...................................................................... 18 4.1.2 More Bicycle Routes Are Needed....................................................................... 18 4.1.3 Information on Bicycle Resources Is Currently Scattered............................... 18 4.1.4 Positive Economic Benefits Are Likely .............................................................. 19 4.1.5 Implementation Can Be Gradual and Variable ................................................ 19 4.2 Determining the Primary BSG Corridors............................................................... 19 4.3 BSG Routing Criteria ................................................................................................. 19 4.4 The Seven BSG Corridors.......................................................................................... 20 4.4.1 Shared Use Path Components of the BSG......................................................... 21 4.4.2 Mass Central Corridor (MCC)—150 mi ........................................................ 21 4.4.3 Berkshires Corridor (BC)—65 mi ................................................................... 22 4.4.4 Connecticut River Valley Corridor (CRVC) (East and West)—120 mi..... 23 4.4.5 Nashua River—Buzzards Bay Corridor (NRBBC)—140 mi....................... 24 4.4.6 Boston‐Cape Cod Corridor (BCC)—150 mi.................................................. 25 4.4.7 North Shore Corridor (NSC)—(55 mi) .......................................................... 25 4.4.8 Merrimack River—Charles River Corridor (MRCRC)—60 mi .................. 26 4.5 BSG Summary ............................................................................................................. 27 5 BSG Implementation and Funding.............................................................. 35 5.1 Interim Strategy........................................................................................................... 35 5.2 Branding........................................................................................................................ 35 5.3 EOT/MassHighway Duties ....................................................................................... 36 5.3.1 On‐Road Routing Coordination ......................................................................... 36 5.3.2 Development and Management of the BSG Website....................................... 36 5.3.3 Mapping................................................................................................................. 36 5.3.4 Management of the Bicycle Project Database............................................... 37 5.3.5 Signs and Pavement Markings ........................................................................... 37 5.3.6 Promotional Events and Building Support....................................................... 37 5.3.7 Startup Cost Estimate........................................................................................... 38 5.4 BSG Funding Strategy................................................................................................ 38 5.4.1 Funding Requirements for Shared Use Path Systems..................................... 38 5.4.2 Resource Allocation to the BSG...................................................................... 38 5.4.3 Long‐Term BSG Implementation Cost Estimates ........................................ 39 5.5 Bicycle Facilities Resource Allocation Strategy .................................................... 40 5.5.1 Prioritization between BSG and Non‐BSG Projects ......................................... 40 5.5.2 Setting Priorities among BSG Project Proposals............................................... 41 5.6 Additional Funding Strategies ................................................................................. 41 6 Other Recommendations and Action Items ............................................... 43 6.1 The Role of State, Regional, and Local Government ........................................... 43 6.1.1 The “Five Es”......................................................................................................... 43 6.2 Outstanding Action Items from the 1998 Plan ...................................................... 44 6.2.1 1998 Plan Accomplishments................................................................................ 44 6.2.2 Continuing Action Recommendations from the 1998 Plan............................. 44 6.3 Other Programs to Improve Bicycle Transportation ............................................ 45 6.3.1 EOT Agency Initiatives ........................................................................................ 45 6.3.2 Other Agency Initiatives...................................................................................... 47 7 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 49 Technical Appendices Massachusetts Bicycle Transportation Plan Appendices...................................... 51 Appendix 1 Governor Deval Patrick’s Sustainable Development Principles .53 Appendix 2 Local and Regional Bicycle Planning Documents Reviewed During the Development of the Plan........................................................................ 55 Appendix 3 Public Outreach in Support of the Plan ............................................. 57 Meeting Summaries.............................................................................................................. 58 Worcester
Load more

Recommended publications
  • STATE LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY (ENROLLMENTS > 1250) ENR. 504S RATE CONNECTICUT Newtown School District 4570 710 15.53% TEXAS
    As a supplement to the corresponDing Zirkel analysis in the Educa'on Law Reporter, this compilaon, in DescenDing orDer of the percentage of 504-only stuDents, is baseD on the 2015-16 CRDC Data. To obtain the actual complete Data anD to request any correcbons, please go Directly to hdps://ocrData.eD.gov/ STATE LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY (ENROLLMENTS > 1250) ENR. 504s RATE CONNECTICUT Newtown School District 4570 710 15.53% TEXAS Carrizo Springs Consol. InDep. School District 2254 325 14.41% CONNECTICUT Weston School District 2393 343 14.33% TEXAS Pittsburg InDep. School District 2472 335 13.55% TEXAS Pleasanton InDep. School District 3520 467 13.26% TEXAS Van Alstyne InDep. School District 1336 174 13.02% NEW JERSEY Hanover Park Regional High School District 1561 200 12.81% TEXAS Buna InDep. School District 1456 183 12.56% TEXAS Tatum InDep. School District 1687 208 12.32% TEXAS Crockett InDep. School District 1280 157 12.26% NEW YORK WinDsor Central School District 1697 208 12.25% TEXAS Hughes Springs InDep. School District 1266 153 12.08% TEXAS Pottsboro InDep. School District 4284 507 11.83% TEXAS Lake Dallas InDep. School District 3945 467 11.83% TEXAS NorthsiDe InDep. School District 105049 12425 11.82% TEXAS Kerrville InDep. School District 5038 592 11.75% TEXAS Gatesville InDep. School District 2853 335 11.74% TEXAS GoDley InDep. School District 1780 205 11.51% PENNSYLVANIA WallingforD-Swarthmore School District 3561 401 11.26% GEORGIA Wilkinson County Schools 1523 169 11.09% LOUISIANA Terrebonne Parish School District 18445 2039 11.05% NEW YORK Briarcliff Manor Union Free School District 1469 162 11.02% WASHINGTON Mercer IslanD School District 4423 485 10.96% TEXAS Community InDep.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Outdoor Recreational Resources— Hampshire County
    CHAPTER 4: OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL RESOURCES— HAMPSHIRE COUNTY Introduction With its rolling hills, cascading waters, deep forests, open meadows, and abundance of open space, the Route 112 Scenic Byway corridor is an extraordinary outdoor playground for residents and visitors alike. Opportunities abound in the region to hike, camp, swim, boat, cross‐country ski, hunt, fish, and cycle. In the Hampshire County section of the corridor, there are nearly 30 square miles of open space available for multiple recreational opportunities, including 5,803 acres within state forests and parks, 10,669 acres within wildlife management areas, and 1,919 acres within other significant open space lands. The greatest recreational treasures in Hampshire County include the Westfield River with its federal Wild and Scenic designation, and the extensive 7,900‐acre wilderness area created by the adjoining lands of the Knightville Dam Wildlife Management and Recreation Area, the Gilbert A. Bliss State Forest, and the Hiram H. Fox Wildlife Management Area. This Outdoor Recreational Resources chapter and accompanying map provide an inventory of recreational resources developed through a review of Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation listings, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s MassWildlife listings, information from the Commonwealth’s Office of Geographic and Environmental Information (MassGIS), and narratives within the Open Space and Recreation Plans of Byway towns. Resources are described here by type of facility (State Forest and Parks, and Wildlife The Westfield River Wildwater Races, an annual spring event for more Management Areas) and than 55 years, attracts boating enthusiasts from across the northeast. by type of activity (hiking trails, camping, swimming, boating, cross‐country skiing and snowshoeing, hunting and fishing, bicycling, and golfing).
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Conservation, Recreation, and Open Space Plan
    May, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - PLAN SUMMARY................................................................................................... 1 A. Background...............................................................................................................................................................1 B. Features of the 2006 CROS Plan...............................................................................................................................1 SECTION 2 - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 2 A. Statement of Purpose ................................................................................................................................................2 B. Planning Process and Public Participation ................................................................................................................2 SECTION 3 - COMMUNITY SETTING....................................................................................... 3 A. Regional Context.......................................................................................................................................................3 B. History of the Community........................................................................................................................................5 C. Population Characteristics........................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Army Civil Works Program Fy 2020 Work Plan - Operation and Maintenance
    ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM FY 2020 WORK PLAN - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE STATEMENT OF STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL LINE ITEM OF BUSINESS MANAGERS AND WORK STATE DIVISION PROJECT OR PROGRAM FY 2020 PBUD MANAGERS WORK PLAN ADDITIONAL FY2020 BUDGETED AMOUNT JUSTIFICATION FY 2020 ADDITIONAL FUNDING JUSTIFICATION PROGRAM PLAN TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT 1/ AMOUNT FUNDING 2/ 2/ Funds will be used for specific work activities including AK POD NHD ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK $10,485,000 $9,685,000 $9,685,000 dredging. AK POD NHD AURORA HARBOR, AK $75,000 $0 Funds will be used for baling deck for debris removal; dam Funds will be used for commonly performed O&M work. outlet channel rock repairs; operations for recreation visitor ENS, FDRR, Funds will also be used for specific work activities including AK POD CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK $7,236,000 $7,236,000 $1,905,000 $9,141,000 6 assistance and public safety; south seepage collector channel; REC relocation of the debris baling area/construction of a baling asphalt roads repairs; and, improve seepage monitoring for deck ($1,800,000). Dam Safety Interim Risk Reduction measures. Funds will be used for specific work activities including AK POD NHS DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 dredging. Funds will be used for dredging environmental coordination AK POD NHS ELFIN COVE, AK $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 5 and plans and specifications. Funds will be used for specific work activities including AK POD NHD HOMER HARBOR, AK $615,000 $615,000 $615,000 dredging. Funds are being used to inspect Federally constructed and locally maintained flood risk management projects with an emphasis on approximately 11,750 of Federally authorized AK POD FDRR INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK 3/ $200,000 $200,000 and locally maintained levee systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Belmont Announces First Annual Porchfest
    Belmont Citizens Forum Belmont Community Path Update, Part One Feasibility Study Plan would Renew Transportation Infrastructure and Create New Public Spaces PARE CORP. K3 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE K3 CORP. PARE At left, an aerial view of Waverley Square, with Lexington Street on the left, Trapelo Road on the right, and Church Street at the bottom. At right, the feasibility study proposed to “box over” Waverley Station and move the parking lot onto Church Street, creating a 31,000-square-foot park traversed by the community path. much of the former Central Massachusetts By Vincent Stanton, Jr. Railroad right-of-way through town was sold A bicycle and pedestrian path stretching from off. That right-of-way is the route for most of the the Charles River in East Cambridge to the town Mass Central Rail Trail elsewhere. of Berlin, beyond Interstate 495, is in various In 2014 the Belmont Board of Selectmen states of design or construction. The path is appointed the Community Path Implementation complete from Brighton Street in Belmont to Advisory Committee (CPIAC) to engage Lowell Street in Somerville (via Alewife station engineering and design consultants to study and Davis Square.) From the Belmont/Waltham possible routes through Belmont. Last December, border west to Route 128, a path is being the selectmen accepted CPIAC’s recommen- designed. Construction is likely to start in early dation to endorse the route proposed by Pare 2019. Corporation and K3 Landscape Architecture That leaves a 2.1-mile gap in Belmont. Filling (“the Pare team”).1 The endorsement is an the gap is difficult because of Belmont’s dense important step for the Belmont Community settlement and hilly topography and because Path, but challenges remain.
    [Show full text]
  • View Strategic Plan
    SURGING TOWARD 2026 A STRATEGIC PLAN Strategic Plan / introduction • 1 One valley… One history… One environment… All powered by the Blackstone River watershed and so remarkably intact it became the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor. SURGING TOWARD 2026 A STRATEGIC PLAN CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................ 2 Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor, Inc. (BHC), ................................................ 3 Our Portfolio is the Corridor ............................ 3 We Work With and Through Partners ................ 6 We Imagine the Possibilities .............................. 7 Surging Toward 2026 .............................................. 8 BHC’s Integrated Approach ................................ 8 Assessment: Strengths & Weaknesses, Challenges & Opportunities .............................. 8 The Vision ......................................................... 13 Strategies to Achieve the Vision ................... 14 Board of directorS Action Steps ................................................. 16 Michael d. cassidy, chair Appendices: richard gregory, Vice chair A. Timeline ........................................................ 18 Harry t. Whitin, Vice chair B. List of Planning Documents .......................... 20 todd Helwig, Secretary gary furtado, treasurer C. Comprehensive List of Strategies donna M. Williams, immediate Past chair from Committees ......................................... 20 Joseph Barbato robert Billington Justine Brewer Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • New England Cycling.Pdf
    KLMNO TrSUNDAYav, MAY 6, 2018 . SECTIONe F l EZ EE Along the East Coast, cyclists give old rail lines new purpose ISLAND LINE IMAGES A grand tour verything we love about New England route under development from Canada to Key is better by bike. When you’re on two West, Fla., is a good place to start. Bruce wheels, the air is crisper, the small Donald, acting New England coordinator for towns lovelier, the coast a bit more like of New the Greenway Alliance, said the region is Eheaven, and the wild blueberries may even be further along than the rest of the East Coast in sweeter. Greenway development. Many of the region’s Last summer, when I found myself without trails are built on former railways, guarantee- a bike while visiting family in Vermont, I ing a relatively flat ride. Also appealing: the rented one at Omer and Bob’s Sportshop in England variety of cycling options in New England. nearby Lebanon, N.H., and rode part of the “You have the urban areas where people are Northern Rail Trail. I pedaled on flat, easy commuting and suburban sections with fewer terrain through a tunnel of brilliantly green BY MELANIE D.G. KAPLAN cars,” Donald said, “and then you get to these trees and detoured to a sparkling lake. Since Special to The Washington Post bucolic places — in every state — and you’re then, I’ve started jotting down names of other literally in the woods with nature, with an trails in the region that I want to bike this eagle and the occasional black bear.” summer — probably many summers hence, by If you’re not sold yet, just wait until the the length of my list.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Plan 2009-2016
    CityCity of ofSomerville Somerville ZONING OVERHAUL www.somervillezoning.com December 04, 2018 We were asked to do two things for today: 1. Present the roadmap to 125 acres 2. Review the zoning petition Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Executive Summary • The City is launching a SomerVision update: • We are committed to putting a stronger focus on planning for public space. • We need additional indicators of success for future planning; The adequacy and validity of using acreage alone for our specific situation and objectives is questionable. • About 20 acres of public space has been created since 2010. Another 11.75 acres is in planning stages right now. 88.25 acres is still needed. • Sites for the remaining 88.25 acres will be hard to find and will cost an estimated $550+ million dollars to acquire, design, and construct. • This cost is too much for the City of Somerville or for development to bear alone. How much each party should provide remains unanswered. • The City is forming a task force to answer these questions by weighing costs/benefits in relation to other objectives. • Interim zoning was prepared, but long term zoning solutions are needed. Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Agenda • Planning for public space • The roadmap to 125 acres • Financing the 125 acre goal • Zoning petition review and next steps Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Planning for Public Space Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Mayor Joseph A Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development We all agree… There is NOT enough public space in Somerville.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Electricity Pricing Plans Debated
    Belmont Citizens Forum Solar Electricity Pricing Plans Debated By Meg Muckenhoupt and Virginia Jordan with an annual cap on solar buyback of 2% of total system sales. When a homeowner’s roof-top solar panels Under Phase 1 net metering, to calculate the generate more electricity than needed, how monthly bill, Belmont Light would measure much should Belmont Light pay for the excess the total amount of electricity a household energy fed back to the grid? uses and then subtract the electricity the That question is roiling environmental circles household produces. If Mary and Bob Sunshine in Belmont. Cutting the payback makes it less use 100-kilowatt hours (kWh) in a month and likely for people to install solar panels. But, are their photovoltaic solar panel system produced ratepayers subsidizing solar power, or vice versa, 75 kWh hours, they would be billed simply for and if so, by how much? Concerned residents 25 kWh. On the other hand, if their system can comment at the Belmont Light public produced 125 kWh, they would be billed hearing on September 18, 2014, at the Town Hall nothing that month and credited 25 kWh Auditorium, 455 Concord Avenue. against future use. Background The retail cost of electricity to Belmont residents includes the wholesale cost plus In 2008, Massachusetts mandated that overhead. Wholesale is what Belmont Light utilities adopt new net metering incentives pays to energy providers; it appears on your to encourage renewable energy installations. electric bill as Generation Usage. Overhead “Renewable energy” means solar, wind, or other includes maintenance of distribution lines non-fossil-fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing and Transportation
    Annual Report Fiscal Year 2003 Cape Cod Commission Barnstable County • Massachusetts Cape Cod Commission Fiscal Year 2003 ( July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003) Robert D. Deane, Chair Robert Randolph, Vice Chair (through April 2003) Susan Kadar, Secretary Appointed Representatives: Barnstable ....................................................................................... David Ansel Bourne ..................................................................................... Robert D. Deane Brewster .................................................................................... Elizabeth Taylor Chatham .................................................................................. Catherine Frazer Dennis............................................................................................ Brad Crowell Eastham ........................................................................................ Ian Aitchison Falmouth ............................................................................. Henry F. Owens III Harwich ...................................................................................... Lawrence Cole Mashpee ...................................................................................... Ernest Virgilio Orleans......................................................................................Frank H. Hogan Provincetown .................................................................................. Len Stewart Sandwich....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shawsheen Aqueduct, Looking Northeast, Middlesex
    SHAWSHEEN AQUEDUCT, LOOKING NORTHEAST, MIDDLESEX CANAL, WILMINGTON-BILLERICA, MASSACHUSETTS OLD-TIME NEW ENGLAND d ’ Quarter/y magazine Devoted to the cffncient Buildings, Household Furnishings, Domestic A-ts, 5l4anner.s and Customs, and Minor cffntipuities of L?Wqew England Teop/e BULLETIN OFTHE SOCIETYFOR THE PRESERVATIONOF NEW ENGLAND ANTIQUITIES Volume LVIII, No. 4 April-June I 968 Serial No. 212 Comparison of The Blackstone and Middlesex Canals By BRENTON H. DICKSON HREE major canals were com- granting the Blackstone its charter. The pleted in Massachusetts in the idea of a canal connecting Boston with T first twenty-odd years of the the Merrimack River and diverting the nineteenth century : the Middlesex, that great natural resources of New Hamp- went from Boston to Lowell, or more shire away from Newburyport and into correctly, from Charlestown to Middle- Boston met with wholehearted approval sex Village in the outskirts of Lowell; the in the capital city; however, the idea of Blackstone that went from Worcester to the landlocked treasures of Worcester Providence ; and the Hampshire and County making their way to the market Hampden, or Farmington, that went by way of Rhode Island, and seeing Prov- from Northampton to New Haven. To- idence benefit from business that rightly day we will just concern ourselves with belonged to Boston, was unthinkable. the first two of these. When the Blackstone Canal finally got They were both conceived about the its charter in 1823, Bostonians dreaded same time in the early 1790’s. The more than ever the evil effects of such a Middlesex began operating in 1803 but waterway.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Operation and Maintenance Annual Report
    2020 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT PRESENTED BY: HNTB CORPORATION PRESENTED TO: MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY HNTB Corporation 340 County Road, Suite 6-C Telephone (207) 774-5155 The HNTB Companies Westbrook, ME 04092 Facsimile (207) 228-0909 Infrastructure Solutions www.hntb.com October 1, 2020 Maine Turnpike Authority 2360 Congress Street Portland, ME 04102 Ladies and Gentlemen, We are pleased to submit our 2020 Operation and Maintenance Annual Report for the Maine Turnpike. This report sets forth our findings as to the condition of the Maine Turn- pike and our recommendations concerning maintenance, operation, insurance, and depos- its to be made to the Capital Improvement and Reserve Maintenance funds and the Opera- tion and Maintenance budget. Our findings and recommendations are based on a visual inspection of the turnpike facilities performed between April and July, 2020; several additional visual inspections of turnpike facilities made during the year; and, on a careful evaluation of turnpike opera- tion and maintenance procedures. We have periodically reported to the Executive Direc- tor, Chief Operations Officer, or Director of Engineering, on other items which warranted prompt attention. We appreciate the opportunity to provide Consulting Engineering Services and we ac- knowledge the excellent cooperation of Authority members and personnel in the perfor- mance of these services. Best regards, Roland A. Lavallee, P.E., PLS Vice President TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 6. Planning Studies 34 » Annual Inspection Program 2 » Exit 32 Feasibility Study 34 2. Inspection Findings and » Exit 36 Feasibility Study 34 Exit 45 Feasibility Study 34 Corrective Measures 5 » » Gorham Corridor Study and » Vegetative Cover 5 Alternatives Analysis 35 » Pavement 6 » Safety and Capacity Study 35 » Bridges and Minor Spans 7 » Portland Area Mainline » Ancillary Structures 14 Needs Assessment 36 » Drainage 15 » Study of the Future Needs of the Piscataqua » Guardrail and Safety Improvements 16 River Bridge 36 » Lighting 18 7.
    [Show full text]