DOCSLIB.ORG

The Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings, Part

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings, Part PROCEEDINGS The Getty Conservation Institute PR Proceedings of Los Angeles OCEEDINGS a Symposium at the J. Paul The Structural Getty Museum, April 1995 Conservation of Panel Paintings The Str uctur al Conser va tion of P anel Paintings The Getty Conservation Institute The Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings Proceedings of a symposium at the J. Paul Getty Museum 24–28 April 1995 Edited by Kathleen Dardes and Andrea Rothe T G C I L A Front cover: Alessandro Allori, The Abduction of Proserpine, 1570. Detail. Oil on panel, 228.5 ϫ 348 cm. The J. Paul Getty Museum (73.PB.73), Los Angeles. Back cover and page 305: Girolamo di Benvenuto, Nativity, ca. 1500, reverse. Tempera on panel, 204 ϫ 161 cm. The J. Paul Getty Museum (54.PB.10), Los Angeles. The panel bears witness to the his- tory of its conservation: This light, modern cradle was installed in 1987, after the removal of heavy, traditional crossbars (see page 187), traces of which are still evident. Strips of aged poplar, inserted to repair cracks caused by earlier restorations, can also be seen. Page 1: Transverse surfaces of chestnut (Castanea sp.) (left) and poplar (Populus sp.) (right), showing pore structures. Page 109: Illustration showing sawyers producing veneers; from J. A. Roubo, L’art du menuisier (Paris: Académie Royale des Sciences, 1769). Page 187: Girolamo di Benvenuto, Nativity, reverse. A cumbersome, traditional cradle, installed around 1900 and removed in 1987, is shown. Tevvy Ball, Managing Editor Sylvia Tidwell, Copy Editor Anita Keys, Production Coordinator Jeffrey Cohen, Series Designer Hespenheide Design, Book Designer Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 © 1998 The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved. The Getty Conservation Institute works internationally to further the appreciation and preservation of the world’s cultural heritage for the enrichment and use of present and future generations. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. The listing of product names and suppliers in this book is provided for information purposes only and is not intended as an endorsement by the Getty Conservation Institute. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The structural conservation of panel paintings : proceedings of a symposium at the J. Paul Getty Museum, 24–28 April 1995 / edited by Kathleen Dardes and Andrea Rothe. p. cm. Organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and the J. Paul Getty Museum. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-384-3 1. Panel painting—Conservation and restoration—Congresses. 2. Panel painting— Expertising—Congresses. I. Dardes, Kathleen, 1952– . II. Rothe, Andrea. III. J. Paul Getty Museum. IV. Getty Conservation Institute. ND1640.S87 1998 98-10541 751.6Ј2—dc21 CIP Contents Miguel Angel Corzo vii Foreword John Walsh Kathleen Dardes ix Preface Andrea Rothe David Bomford xiii Introduction: Keynote Address P ART ONE Wood Science and Technology R. Bruce Hoadley 2 Chemical and Physical Properties of Wood R. Bruce Hoadley 21 Identification of Wood in Painting Panels Peter Klein 39 Dendrochronological Analyses of Panel Paintings Robert A. Blanchette 55 A Guide to Wood Deterioration Caused by Microorganisms and Insects Gordon Hanlon 69 Modified Atmosphere Treatments of Insect Infestations Vinod Daniel Donald C. Williams 79 A Survey of Adhesives for Wood Conservation Arno P. Schniewind 87 Consolidation of Wooden Panels P ART TWO History of Panel-Making Techniques Luca Uzielli 110 Historical Overview of Panel-Making Techniques in Central Italy Zahira Véliz 136 Wooden Panels and Their Preparation for Painting from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century in Spain Jørgen Wadum 149 Historical Overview of Panel-Making Techniques in the Northern Countries Philip Walker 178 The Making of Panels History of Relevant Woodworking Tools and Techniques PART THREE History of the Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings Andrea Rothe 188 Critical History of Panel Painting Restoration in Italy Ulrich Schiessl 200 History of Structural Panel Painting Conservation in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland Ian McClure 237 History of Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings in Great Britain Jacqueline Bret 252 The Conservation-Restoration of Wooden Daniel Jaunard Painting Supports Patrick Mandron Evolution of Methods and Current Research in the Service de Restauration des Musées de France Ségolène Bergeon 264 The Restoration of Wooden Painting Supports Gilberte Emile-Mâle Two Hundred Years of History in France Claude Huot Odile Baÿ James S. Horns 289 Richard Buck The Development and Use of the Balsa Backing for Panel Paintings PART FOUR Current Approaches to the Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings Andrea Rothe 306 Florentine Structural Stabilization Techniques Giovanni Marussich Ciro Castelli 316 The Restoration of Panel Painting Supports Some Case Histories George Bisacca 341 Structural Considerations in the Treatment of a Nativity by Francesco di Giorgio Martini Frédéric J. M. Lebas 359 The Cradling of a Relief of the Annunciation Attributed to Martin Schaffner Jean-Albert Glatigny 364 Backings of Painted Panels Reinforcement and Constraint Simon Bobak 371 A Flexible Unattached Auxiliary Support Raymond Marchant 382 The Development of a Flexible Attached Auxiliary Support Anthony M. Reeve 403 Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings at the National Gallery, London Al Brewer 418 Some Rejoining Methods for Panel Paintings Ian McClure 433 The Framing of Wooden Panels Al Brewer 448 Practical Aspects of the Structural Conservation of Large Panel Paintings Antoine M. Wilmering 479 A Renaissance Studiolo from the Ducal Palace in Gubbio Technical Aspects of the Conservation Treatment Jørgen Wadum 497 Microclimate Boxes for Panel Paintings Mervin Richard 525 Technical Considerations for the Transport of Marion Mecklenburg Panel Paintings Charles S. Tumosa 557 Contributors 563 Illustration Credits vii Foreword the Getty Conservation Institute and the J. Paul Getty Museum sponsored an international symposium, “The Structural IConservation of Panel Paintings,” at the J. Paul Getty Museum in Malibu, California. Initially the idea of Andrea Rothe, head of Paintings Conservation at the Museum, and enthusiastically supported by Kathleen Dardes, senior coordinator in the Institute’s Training Program, the confer- ence was attended by more than two hundred participants from some twenty countries, who gathered for five days of papers and discussions. During pauses, participants were able to meet informally with old and new colleagues in the galleries and gardens of the Museum. This com- bination of formal and informal exchanges greatly encouraged the flow of ideas and contributed significantly to the success of the symposium. The purpose of the symposium was to document the techniques, both traditional and contemporary, of panel stabilization. This book encompasses the wide range of topics covered by the speakers. After an introductory examination of wood characteristics, the papers go on to consider the technological aspects of wood, the history of panel-making techniques, and the various methods of panel stabilization that have been developed and refined over the course of many centuries. Indeed, as the reader will discover, many of the techniques described are the products of a long and venerable tradition developed by generations of master arti- sans, who then passed along an understanding of and sensitivity to the properties of wood. Other articles focus on the modern scientific and tech- nical advances that conservation has made in the second half of the twen- tieth century—advances that have helped conservators solve, often by innovative methods, the most challenging structural problems. In sponsoring this symposium, the Museum and the Conservation Institute hoped to contribute to a wider understanding of the historical, prac- tical, and scientific aspects of panel stabilization. We are grateful to Andrea Rothe and Kathleen Dardes for the dedication they have shown in the organi- zation of the symposium and in the publication of these proceedings. Miguel Angel Corzo John Walsh The Getty Conservation Institute The J. Paul Getty Museum ix Preface representing the aesthetic and intellectual sensibilities of their creators, the world’s great paintings serve as rich historical Idocuments. The close contact with these works of art that conserva- tors and curators have long enjoyed allows access to their most hidden parts and, consequently, to a better understanding of the materials and working practices that are the underpinnings of artistic expression. For paintings are more than the manifestation of an idea or a creative impulse; they are also a composite of ordinary materials, such as wood, glue, can- vas, metal, and pigments of various sorts, that have been put to a wonder- ful purpose. Wood has served for centuries as a support for painting, largely because of its strength and availability. Paralleling the long history of wood as a painting substrate is an almost equally long history of attempts to control its behavior. An early recognition of the tendency of all wood species to deform under certain conditions has led generations of wood- workers to devise techniques, both varied and ingenious, to control the movement of wooden supports and its consequent damage to the paint layer. However, even the most ingenious efforts on the part of panel makers to create strong painting supports were often overcome by the inherent properties of wood. In response to such problems, time has wit- nessed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Century American Gilded Picture Frames Hugh Glover
    Tech Notes, Fall 2006 Care and use of 19th-century American gilded picture frames Hugh Glover icture frames are a component of most art collections and are subject to wear and tear in their functional role surrounding paint- P ings. Damage to frames occurs during exhibition, storage, and travel, and is caused by handling, hanging processes, adverse environments, neglect, and irreversible restorations. Picture frames are maintained by a variety of preservation specialist and their preservation interests have only rarely been addressed. The following is Section 4 of a larger paper, “A Description of 19th- Century American Gilded Picture Frames and an Outline of their Modern Use and Conservation,” presented in June to the Wooden Artifact Group at the 2006 annual meeting of AIC in Providence, Rhode Island. This sec- tion addresses general preservation, handling and preparation of frames for exhibition. Environment Gilded wood objects are ultra sensitive to environmental conditions and are probably more sensitive than most paintings. Gilded wood in adverse climates experiences detachment and loss of gilding/or- nament, while the accumulation of grime leads to surface darkening and cleaning campaigns that may well cause damage. The protected bright gilding that survives on shadow boxed frames of the second half-century illustrates how more exposed gilding has now been altered by grime, abrasion, and staining from moisture and grease during handling. Handling All gilded objects should be handled with non-marring gloves to avoid abrasions and staining, and even paper towels or cotton cloth will suffice. In practice, however, gilded frames are still handled with bare hands as the frame is considered a safe means of handling the artwork.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2-29-2012 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Eugenio H. Nearns University of New Mexico, [email protected] Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru, [email protected] Ian P. Swift California State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] Marcela L. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Monné, Miguel A.; Nearns, Eugenio H.; Carbonel Carril, Sarah C.; Swift, Ian P.; and Monné, Marcela L., "Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru" (2012). Insecta Mundi. Paper 717. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/717 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0213 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Museu Nacional Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Quinta da Boa Vista São Cristóvão, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Eugenio H. Nearns Department of Biology Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Departamento de Entomología Museo de Historia Natural Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Avenida Arenales 1256, Lima, Peru Ian P.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Archaeology
    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 5 Number 2 2010/2011 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Robert E. Carter, Jr., Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) James A. Glass, Ph.D., Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson Cathy L. Draeger-Williams Cathy A. Carson Wade T. Tharp Editors James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson, Senior Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Cathy A. Carson, Records Check Coordinator Publication Layout: Amy L. Johnson Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from several of the individual articles included in this journal. Mission Statement: The Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology promotes the conservation of Indiana’s cultural resources through public education efforts, financial incentives including several grant and tax credit programs, and the administration of state and federally mandated legislation. 2 For further information contact: Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology 402 W. Washington Street, Room W274 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2739 Phone: 317/232-1646 Email: [email protected] www.IN.gov/dnr/historic 2010/2011 3 Indiana Archaeology Volume 5 Number 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors of articles were responsible for ensuring that proper permission for the use of any images in their articles was obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circumcision
    1969 Washington: no. 20. by 1669.2 Probably Isaak van den Blooken, the Netherlands, 1974 Hasselgren: in, 127, 131, 195, 198, no. G 53, by 1707; (sale, Amsterdam, 11 May 1707, no. 1). Duke of repro. Ancaster, by 1724;3 (sale, London, March 1724, no. 18); 1975 NGA: 284, 285, no. 77, repro. Andrew Hay; (sale, Cock, London, 14 February 1745, no. 1978 Bolten and Bolten-Rempt: 202, no. 549, repro. 47); John Spencer, 1st Earl of Spencer [1734-1783], Althorp 1984/1985 Schwartz: 339, no. 396, repro. (also 1985 House; inherited through family members to John Poyntz, English ed.). 5th Earl of Spencer [1835-1910]; (Arthur J. Sulley & Co., 1985 NGA: 330, repro. London); Peter A. B. Widener, Lynnewood Hall, Elkins 1986 Sutton: 314. Park, Pennsylvania, by 1912; inheritance from Estate of 1986 Tumpel: 413, no. 217, repro. Peter A. B. Widener by gift through power of appointment 1986 Guillaud and Guillaud: 362, no. 416, repro. of Joseph E. Widener, Elkins Park. 1990 The Hague: no. 53. Exhibited: Exhibition of Paintings, Leeds Art Gallery, Leeds, 1868, no. 735. Rembrandt: Schilderijen Bijeengebracht ter Ge- lengenheid van de Inhuidiging van Hare Majesteit Koningin Wil- 1942.9.60 (656) helmina, Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam, 1898, no. 115. Winter Exhibition of Works by Rembrandt, Royal Academy, Lon­ don, 1899, no. 5. Washington 1969, no. 22. Rembrandt and the Rembrandt van Rijn Bible, Fukuoka Art Museum, Fukuoka; National Museum of Modern Art, Kyoto, 1987, no. 11. The Circumcision 1661 THE ONLY MENTION of the Circumcision of Christ Oil on canvas, 56.5 x 75 (22/4 x 29/2) occurs in the Gospel of Luke, 2:15-22: "...the Widener Collection shepherds said one to another, Let us now go even Inscriptions unto Bethlehem And they came with haste, and At lower right: Rembrandt, f 1661 found Mary and Joseph, and the babe lying in a manger— And when eight days were accomplished Technical Notes: The original support, a medium-weight, for the circumcising of the child, his name was called loosely woven, plain-weave fabric, has been lined with the tacking margins unevenly trimmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice
    Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice PUBLICATIONS COORDINATION: Dinah Berland EDITING & PRODUCTION COORDINATION: Corinne Lightweaver EDITORIAL CONSULTATION: Jo Hill COVER DESIGN: Jackie Gallagher-Lange PRODUCTION & PRINTING: Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZERS: Erma Hermens, Art History Institute of the University of Leiden Marja Peek, Central Research Laboratory for Objects of Art and Science, Amsterdam © 1995 by The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-89236-322-3 The Getty Conservation Institute is committed to the preservation of cultural heritage worldwide. The Institute seeks to advance scientiRc knowledge and professional practice and to raise public awareness of conservation. Through research, training, documentation, exchange of information, and ReId projects, the Institute addresses issues related to the conservation of museum objects and archival collections, archaeological monuments and sites, and historic bUildings and cities. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. COVER ILLUSTRATION Gherardo Cibo, "Colchico," folio 17r of Herbarium, ca. 1570. Courtesy of the British Library. FRONTISPIECE Detail from Jan Baptiste Collaert, Color Olivi, 1566-1628. After Johannes Stradanus. Courtesy of the Rijksmuseum-Stichting, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Historical painting techniques, materials, and studio practice : preprints of a symposium [held at] University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 26-29 June 1995/ edited by Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-322-3 (pbk.) 1. Painting-Techniques-Congresses. 2. Artists' materials- -Congresses. 3. Polychromy-Congresses. I. Wallert, Arie, 1950- II. Hermens, Erma, 1958- . III. Peek, Marja, 1961- ND1500.H57 1995 751' .09-dc20 95-9805 CIP Second printing 1996 iv Contents vii Foreword viii Preface 1 Leslie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings 306
    PART FOUR Current Approaches to the Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings 306 Florentine Structural Stabilization Techniques Andrea Rothe and Giovanni Marussich by the great flood of 1966 in Florence than by both World Wars combined. Many paintings Mand other artifacts were submerged in the floodwaters for more than eighteen hours. They were covered with mud mixed with heavy deposits of heating oil that had seeped from the storage tanks housed in the many basements of the city.The worst damage was done to the large num- ber of panel paintings in Florence and the surrounding countryside; those that had been submerged swelled many inches beyond their original size. Subsequently, these paintings were subjected to a long and gradual drying process, first in the limonaia, the old hothouses built by the Medici in the Boboli Gardens for their favorite collection of citrus plants. These hothouses were quickly converted into one large humidity chamber. The humidity was raised to 95% at a temperature of 12 °C over a two-year period. Afterward, the treatment was continued in the former army bar- racks of the Fortezza da Basso, which in the meantime had been trans- formed into the largest restoration laboratory in the world; it had, in fact, become an independent governmental department, a soprintendenza, by special decree. Despite the carefully controlled drying process, many of the panels shrank considerably. This shrinkage caused severe blistering and cupping of the paint layers, as well as deformation of the supports (Cianfanelli, Ciani Passeri, and Rossi Scarzanella 1992). Consequently, many of the panel paintings had to be transferred to canvases and to new, rigid supports.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Cradle Removal in X-Ray Images of Art Paintings
    DIGITAL CRADLE REMOVAL IN X-RAY IMAGES OF ART PAINTINGS Rujie Yin1, David Dunson1, Bruno Cornelis2, Bill Brown3, Noelle Ocon3, Ingrid Daubechies1 1: Duke University, USA; 2: Free University Brussels (VUB), Belgium; 3: North Carolina Museum of Art, USA ABSTRACT cradling slat perpendicular back of painted We introduce an algorithm that removes the deleterious effect to panel wood grain panel of cradling on X-ray images of paintings on wooden panels. The algorithm consists of a three stage procedure. Firstly, the cradled regions are located automatically. The second direction of wood step consists of separating the X-ray image into a textural grain of panel cradling slats in direction of and image component. In the last step the algorithm learns panel wood grain to distinguish between the texture caused by the wooden cra- dle and the texture belonging to the original painted wooden Fig. 1: Cradle of old paintings on wood panel. The results obtained with our method are compared panel: Top left: a sample patch from the X- with those obtained manually by best current practice. ray image of a cradled painting panel, illustrat- ing the artifacts caused by the cradling, with en- Index Terms— texture, art, painting, cradle. larged detail (showing cradle wood grain). Top right: sketch of the lattice of crossed perpendicu- 1. INTRODUCTION = p lar wooden slats: slats parallel to the panel wood bd = c grain are glued first; transverse slats are slotted = int 1.1. The digital cradle removal problem c in. Left: indication, on the sample patch, of the partition into different domains used in x2.
    [Show full text]
  • Printed in Amsterdam, 1980), 2:220
    Self-Portrait of an Artist Seated at an ca. 1653 Easel oil on panel with arched top 29.7 x 24.8 cm Attributed to Cornelis Bisschop LS-100 (Dordrecht 1630 – 1674 Dordrecht) © 2021 The Leiden Collection Self-Portrait of an Artist Seated at an Easel Page 2 of 7 How to cite Yeager-Crasselt, Lara. “Self-Portrait of an Artist Seated at an Easel” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 3rd ed. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. and Lara Yeager-Crasselt. New York, 2020–. https://theleidencollection.com/artwork/self-portrait-of-an-artist-seated-at-an-easel/ (accessed October 01, 2021). A PDF of every version of this entry is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs. © 2021 The Leiden Collection Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Self-Portrait of an Artist Seated at an Easel Page 3 of 7 Seated before a panel painting resting on his easel, a young painter turns Comparative Figures toward the viewer with his arm casually propped on the back of his chair.[1] With slightly parted mouth and searching, wide-eyed gaze, the artist is portrayed with an air of immediacy and informality. Except for a small table in the left background, the studio is bare and unadorned, its simplicity evident even in the worn, mottled wood of the artist’s chair. A strong light entering from the left creates sharp highlights on the man’s mustard-colored blouse and violet beret, and illuminates the thin ties of his cyan blue painter’s robe where it hangs over the back of the chair.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Netherlandish Underdrawing Craze and the End of a Connoisseurship Era
    Genius disrobed: The Early Netherlandish underdrawing craze and the end of a connoisseurship era Noa Turel In the 1970s, connoisseurship experienced a surprising revival in the study of Early Netherlandish painting. Overshadowed for decades by iconographic studies, traditional inquiries into attribution and quality received a boost from an unexpected source: the Ph.D. research of the Dutch physicist J. R. J. van Asperen de Boer.1 His contribution, summarized in the 1969 article 'Reflectography of Paintings Using an Infrared Vidicon Television System', was the development of a new method for capturing infrared images, which more effectively penetrated paint layers to expose the underdrawing.2 The system he designed, followed by a succession of improved analogue and later digital ones, led to what is nowadays almost unfettered access to the underdrawings of many paintings. Part of a constellation of established and emerging practices of the so-called 'technical investigation' of art, infrared reflectography (IRR) stood out in its rapid dissemination and impact; art historians, especially those charged with the custodianship of important collections of Early Netherlandish easel paintings, were quick to adopt it.3 The access to the underdrawings that IRR afforded was particularly welcome because it seems to somewhat offset the remarkable paucity of extant Netherlandish drawings from the first half of the fifteenth century. The IRR technique propelled rapidly and enhanced a flurry of connoisseurship-oriented scholarship on these Early Netherlandish panels, which, as the earliest extant realistic oil pictures of the Renaissance, are at the basis of Western canon of modern painting. This resulted in an impressive body of new literature in which the evidence of IRR played a significant role.4 In this article I explore the surprising 1 Johan R.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Impact of Walnut Twig Beetle in Urban Forest, Orchard, and Native Forest Ecosystems
    J. For. 117(2):152–163 BARK BEETLE SPECIAL SECTION doi: 10.1093/jofore/fvy081 Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of American Foresters 2019. Tis work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. entomology Status and Impact of Walnut Twig Beetle in Urban Forest, Orchard, and Native Forest Ecosystems Steven J. Seybold, William E. Klingeman III, Stacy M. Hishinuma, Tom W. Coleman, and Andrew D. Graves The walnut twig beetle, a native phloem-boring bark beetle originating on Arizona walnut, has invaded urban, is fatal to walnut trees (Figure 2) and was frst orchard, and native forest habitats throughout the USA as well as in Italy. Although the beetle has been associated noted in the late 2000s for its involvement with dead and dying walnut trees indigenous to riparian forests of the Southwest, the primary impact appears to in the gradual deterioration and mortality of have been on the health of landscape black walnut trees in urban and peri-urban sites in western US states, and several species of black walnut in the west- in Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Virginia. This has been refected in numbers of trees removed and tree removal ern United States (Graves et al. 2009, Flint costs. In addition, trees have been killed in the primary US Juglans germplasm repository in northern California, et al. 2010, Tisserat et al. 2011, Seybold and low, but measureable, tree mortality has occurred in some English walnut orchards in California’s Central Valley. et al. 2013b).
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of 19Th-Century American Gilded Picture Frames
    Figure 1. Plate 9 from Benjamin, A. (1827). The American Builder’s Companion. “A, cavetto, or hollow; B, cavetto and astragal; C, ovolo and fillet; D, ovolo and astragal; E, cymareversa, or ogee; F, cymareversa and bead; G, astragal; H, bead; I, cimarecta; K, L, and M, are scoties of different projections and curves; N, O, P, are quirk ogees.” 2006 WAG Postprints—Providence, Rhode Island A Description of 19th-century American Gilded Picture Frames and an Outline of Their Modern Use and Conservation Hugh Glover, Conservator of Furniture and Wood Objects, Williamstown Art Conservation Center ABSTRacT Picture frames are a functional component of most art collections and they are subject to wear and tear as they fulfill their housing function for paintings. Damage to picture frames can occur during exhibitions, storage, and travel, and is caused by handling, hanging processes, adverse environments, neglect, and irreversible restorations. Picture frames are maintained by a variety of preservation specialists, and despite their ubiq- uity they have not become the domain of any one conservation discipline, and there is scant literature devoted to their preservation interests. This paper will focus on the analysis of 19th century American gilded picture frames, as well as preventive care, modern modifications, and restoration/conservation treatments. The talk is derived from the cumulative experience in treating frames at the Williamstown Art Conserva- tion Laboratory (WACC). The paper will address frame nomenclature and the development of popular styles and con- structions of the 19th century. It will outline ornament forms and materials, and give an overview of period gilding techniques.
    [Show full text]