Rancho Corral De Tierra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rancho Corral De Tierra RANCHO CORRAL DE TIERRA RANCHO CORRAL DE TIERRA (AND THE MONTARA LIGHTHOUSE STATION) ancho Corral de Tierra was a land grant issued in two parts during the Mexi- can Era of California history. It extended from the southern base of Montara RMountain in the north to Pilarcitos Creek at Half Moon Bay to the south and took up lands from the ocean on the west into the coastal mountains to the east. Fran- cisco Guerrero y Palomares owned the property north of Miramar or El Arroyo de en Medio,1 and Tiburcio Vásquez possessed the grant south of there.2 Today, the Golden Gate National Recreation Area has park space on the eastern side of Guerrero hold- ings, encompassing real estate behind the communities of Montara, Moss Beach and El Granada.3 It includes open space, ranches and farms. For the purposes of this study, topics will include not just the history of the Park’s acreage, but the immediate surrounding areas as well that were part of the original Rancho Corral de Tierra which, of course, did not exist in isolation. Thus information is presented about the pre-Spanish contact in the vicinity, the stories of both land grant families, early agriculture on the San Mateo coast, the whaling station at Pillar Point, shipwrecks and the Montara Lighthouse, the commercial fishing industry and the his- tory of Princeton-by-the-Sea, the Ocean Shore Railroad’s El Granada, World War II defense installations, big wave surfing at Maverick’s, San Mateo County’s preservation efforts at the Fitzgerald Marine Reserve and the activities of the National Park Service at Rancho Corral de Tierra. PRE-CONTACT AND EUROPEAN ARRIVAL (CONTEXTUAL) In 1994, archeologist Mark Hylkema discovered a portion of a crescent-shaped stone tool while completing investigations inside the fault at Seal Cove within San Mateo County’s Fitzgerald Marine Reserve, west of the National Park’s property at Rancho Corral de Tierra. By use of radiocarbon dating of nearby shell and charcoal, the tool was determined to possibly be between 5,500 and 8,000 years old.4 The age of the artifact startled those interested in the San Francisco Peninsula’s prehistory because it suggests the presence of previously unknown people that were here before the Ohlones by 500 to 2,500 years. (At the earliest, the Ohlones are thought to have arrived in the Bay Area about 5,000 years ago.) Who these people were is a mystery. Evidence of other ancients living in California going back as far as 10,000 years has been found. From the bone tools and few remains of such remnants, it is theorized that these early natives lived a nomadic existence; they followed the migratory patterns of large animals and waterfowl. The Hylkema crescent is made of Franciscan Chert 107 HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY FOR GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA IN SAN MATEO COUNTY which is found east of the San Andreas Fault. The tool is on display at the San Mateo County History Museum in Redwood City. Actually, Hylkema found four different earthen layers within the deposit, indicating that humans lived in the Rancho Corral de Tierra neighborhood for many hundreds of years. Hylkema’s most recent find included a cooking hearth between 600 and 800 years old. Meanwhile, geologists found it most interesting that the offsets seen in the different ground layers indicated two significant earthquakes had occurred locally during times before European contact.5 When Portolá came through in 1769, the people at what became Rancho Corral de Tierra were Ohlones that spoke the San Francisco Bay Costanoan dialect, as did all the local tribes that lived in today’s San Mateo and San Francisco counties. Besides a number of archaeological sites, the only hint of their occupation of the land exists in some of the remains of their trail system. Perhaps for as many as 5,000 years, these people traveled over and back from Montara Mountain on paths, portions of which are still visible. At McNee Ranch State Park, just north of Rancho Corral de Tierra, the Indian trail is visible uphill from Gray Whale Overlook near Saddle Pass on the North Peak Access Road. The Indian path probably followed the ridge line south, behind the Willow Brooks Estates area in Pacifica’s Linda Mar District, up Montara Mountain to Saddle Pass, to the ridge above Green Valley, before dropping down to Martini Creek. When modern-day hikers stand on Saddle Pass, they are at the point where the Indian people crossed the mountain, and, where later on, Spanish explorers, Franciscan mis- sionaries, hard riding vaqueros, and users of early American roads traversed it.6 The Ohlone people occupying the territory from Montara Mountain down to Half Moon Bay called themselves the Chiguan. At the time of Spanish contact (1769), the entire local tribe consisted of no more than 50 people. Mission records reveal the presence of two Chiguan villages. Ssatumnumo existed in the Princeton-Pillar Point area and was closer to National Park Service land. The other, Chagūnte, was further south near Pilarcitos Creek, in today’s Half Moon Bay.7 The first recorded European sighting of the area was accomplished by Francisco Gali aboard the sailing ship San Juan Bautista in 1595. As he cruised southward along the California coast, just before resting at Monterey, he described Pillar Point, due west of National Park property at Rancho Corral de Tierra.8 On October 28, 1769, Spanish soldier Captain Gaspar de Portolá, looking for sites for settlement in Alta California, crossed Pilarcitos Creek and entered into Chiguan country. His engineer, Miguel Costansó, described the place around Half Moon Bay as “lacking in wood” and “very little inhabited”. As they approached Pillar Point he complained: “We were frequently rained upon; our provisions were running out, and 108 RANCHO CORRAL DE TIERRA the men’s ration reduced to a mere five flour and bran cakes a day; no grain, no meat (four bags of it that were left being saved for the sick)…”9 It was here that the officers proposed slaying mules for food, but the men elected to put this drastic step off for a time of greater need. After all, the Spanish were able to hunt ducks and eat what the local people gave them. However, the native cuisine caused diarrhea among many of the men including Captain Portolá and Costansó. Once at Pillar Point, the party made camp. Costansó noted the weather changed; the winds, rain and fog let-up. However, overnight it began raining again. Costansó called the place Llano de los Anseres, or Goose Plain, because of the abundant water fowl. Franciscan Padre Juan Crespi reported that because Portolá seemed too ill to continue, they rested at Pillar Point for a day. He described how the villagers of the nearby point (probably of Ssatumnumo) gave the Spanish tamales, as did all the Ohlone people Portolá’s group met on the San Mateo County Coast. Finally on October 30, the weather cleared, and they set out again. Portolá wrote that his men had to “make two bridges,” and now it was his turn to complain about there being “no wood”. Crespi also mentioned the lack of trees. They had awakened the camp at 4 a.m., crossed Martini’s Creek and came up to the base of San Pedro or Mon- tara Mountain. Costansó wrote: We broke camp and went along the shore until, leaving the point with island rocks to the west of us [near the famous Maverick’s waves], we passed over some knolls and across… hollows with… deep gulches full of water at which we were delayed by [having to] throw small bridges over them. We stopped close to the sea-shore, along which the way was entirely shut off by a high cliffy hill at the root of which ran a small stream [Martini’s Creek] of good water, coming out of a pocket in between various elevations… we placed the camp, up against the hills...10 Crespi’s October 30 journal records his calling Pillar Point, la Punta de los Angeles Cus- todios, Guardian Angels Point. He named the campsite at Martini’s Creek, el Arroyo Hondo de Almejas, the Deep Creek at the Musselbed, for obvious reasons.11 The Chiguan next met Spaniards in 1774. Captain Fernando Rivera with Franciscan Padre Francisco Palou led a land party up from Monterey to further explore the San Francisco Peninsula. They became the first Europeans to spot the Golden Gate from the south. During the mission, they met the people at Ssatumnumo who were still friendly. Rivera offered the headman, Camsegmne, tobacco, cloth and toys. Cam- segmne was, by ten years, the younger brother of Yagueche, headman of the Aramai to the north. 109 HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY FOR GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA IN SAN MATEO COUNTY Between 1783 and 1791, most of the Chiguan were baptized at Mission San Francisco de Asís. In the 1790s, the Mission Fathers began grazing cattle in the Rancho Corral de Tierra area. These lands that Portolá, Costansó and Crespi had criticized for lack of wood were perfect for livestock raising. For centuries the Indians had been burning the landscape to make it better for the herds of large grazing animals that they hunted. The Ohlones had made conditions perfect for the Spanish new intentions for the mid- coast.12 THE VAQUERO WAY (CONTEXTUAL) Texas cowboy, artist and historian Jo Mora made a compelling argument in his 1949 book, Californios: The Saga of the Hard-riding Vaqueros, America’s First Cowboys, that the Alta California vaqueros at the Franciscan missions were the first cowboys of the West: I have had some grand arguments in years past as to who the first cowboys were.
Recommended publications
  • Draft 2019 Superintendent's Compendium Version 1
    National Park Service Golden Gate National Recreation Area U.S. Department of the Interior Fort Mason Building 201 San Francisco, California 94123 (415) 561-4720 phone (415) 561-4710 fax DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT 2019 Superintendent’s Compendium Of Designations, Closures, Permit Requirements and Other Restrictions Imposed Under Discretionary Authority Approved: ____________________ ______________ Laura E. Joss Date General Superintendent Golden Gate National Recreation Area In accordance with the regulations and delegated authority provided in Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Parts 1 through 7, authorized by Title 54, United States Code, Section 100751(a), the following regulatory provisions are established for the proper management and protection of all lands and waters administered by the National Park Service within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area south of the Bolinas-Fairfax Road, including Muir Woods National Monument and Fort Point National Historic Site. Unless otherwise stated, these regulatory provisions apply in addition to the requirements contained in 36 CFR, Chapter 1, Parts 1-6, and Sections 7.6 and 7.97 in Part 7. Written determinations that explain the reasoning behind the Superintendent’s use of discretionary authority as required by Section 1.5 (c) appear in this document identified by italicized print. The Compendium and its exhibits are available on the Golden Gate National Recreation Area’s (GGNRA or Park) website. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 – GENERAL PROVISIONS 3 Section 1.1 Definitions 3 Section
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California State Parks
    1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 Pelican SB Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Smith River Off Highway Vehicle Use Off Highway Vehicle Use Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating ( Tolowa Dunes SP C Educational Programs Educational Programs Wind Surfing/Surfing Wind Surfing/Surfing lo RV Sites w/Hookups RV Sites w/Hookups Gasquet 199 s Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating A 101 ed Horseback Riding Horseback Riding Lake Earl RV Dump Station Mountain Biking RV Dump Station Mountain Biking r i S v e n m i t h R i Rustic Cabins Rustic Cabins w Visitor Center Food Service Visitor Center Food Service Camp Site(s) Snow Sports Camp Site(s) Geocaching Snow Sports Crescent City i Picnic Area Camp Store Geocaching Picnic Area Camp Store Jedediah Smith Redwoods n Restrooms RV Access Swimming Restrooms RV Access Swimming t Hilt S r e Seiad ShowersMuseum ShowersMuseum e r California Lodging California Lodging SP v ) l Klamath Iron Fishing Fishing F i i Horse Beach Hiking Beach Hiking o a Valley Gate r R r River k T Happy Creek Res. Copco Del Norte Coast Redwoods SP h r t i t e s Lake State Parks State Parks · S m Camp v e 96 i r Hornbrook R C h c Meiss Dorris PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES t i Scott Bar f OREGON i Requa a Lake Tulelake c Admiral William Standley SRA, G2 • • (707) 247-3318 Indian Grinding Rock SHP, K7 • • • • • • • • • • • (209) 296-7488 Klamath m a P Lower CALIFORNIA Redwood K l a Yreka 5 Tule Ahjumawi Lava Springs SP, D7 • • • • • • • • • (530) 335-2777 Jack London SHP, J2 • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 938-5216 l K Sc Macdoel Klamath a o tt Montague Lake A I m R National iv Lake Albany SMR, K3 • • • • • • (888) 327-2757 Jedediah Smith Redwoods SP, A2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 458-3018 e S Mount a r Park h I4 E2 t 3 Newell Anderson Marsh SHP, • • • • • • (707) 994-0688 John B.
    [Show full text]
  • 203287 Cov Final Vol 1.Ai
    Summary Summary SUMMARY Sections Figures Tables S.1 Introduction and Purpose of S.1 Overview of SFPUC Regional S.1 WSIP Goals and Objectives the PEIR System and Water Supply Watersheds S.2 WSIP Facility Improvement S.2 Program Description Projects S.2 SFPUC Water Service Area – S.3 Environmental Effects San Francisco and SFPUC S.3 Summary of WSIP Facility Construction and Operation S.4 Areas of Controversy and Wholesale Customers Impacts Issues to be Resolved S.3 Annual Average Historical and S.4 Summary of Facility Mitigation S.5 Required Actions and Projected Customer Purchase Measures by Impact Approvals Requests S.5 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6 WSIP Variants S.4 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Nondrought Years and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Alternatives to the Proposed Tuolumne River System and Program S.5 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Downstream Water Bodies Drought Years S.6 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6a Location of WSIP Facility and Mitigation Measures – Improvement Projects – Sunol Alameda Creek Watershed Valley, Bay Division, Peninsula, and San Francisco Regions S.7 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6b Location of WSIP Facility Peninsula Watersheds Improvement Projects – San Joaquin Region S.8 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6c Location of WSIP Facility Westside Groundwater Basin Improvement Projects – Hetch Hetchy Region S.9 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Preliminary WSIP Construction Cumulative Water Supply Schedule S.1 Introduction and Purpose of the PEIR (Chapter 1) The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to adopt and implement the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP or proposed program) to increase the reliability of the regional water system that serves 2.4 million people in San Francisco and the San Francisco Bay Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Farallon Islands and Noon Day Rock, Supports the Largest Seabird Nesting Colony South of Alaska
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Farallon National Wildlife Refuge Photo: ©PRBO Dense colonies of common murres and colorful puffins cloak cliff faces and crags, while two-ton elephant seals fight fierce battles for breeding sites on narrow wave-etched terraces below. Natural History Surrounded by cold water and plenty of food Pt. Reyes San Rafael G ulf o f Fa Golden ra ll Gate on s Bridge iles Oakland 28 M San Francisco C a li fo Fremont rn PACIFIC OCEAN ia San Jose Farallon National Wildlife Refuge, made up of all the Farallon Islands and Noon Day Rock, supports the largest seabird nesting colony south of Alaska. Thirteen seabird species numbering over 200,000 individuals Pigeon nest here each summer. Throughout the year, six species of marine mammals Guillemot breed or haul out on the islands. These islands are beside the cold California current which originates in Alaska and flows north to south, they are also surrounded Photo: © Brian O’Neil by waters of the Gulf of Farallons National Marine Sanctuary. Lying 28 miles west of San Francisco Bay the Refuge is on the western edge of the continental shelf. This area of Western gull the ocean plunges to 6,000 foot depths. Cold upwelling water brought from the depths as the wind blows surface water westward from the shoreline, and the California current flowing southward past the islands provides an ideal biological mixing zone along the continental shelf and around the San Francisco Bay area. Photos: © Brian O’Neil We stw ard Win ds Upwelling ent Mixing urr a C Deep rni lifo Ca Cold Water S N USGS Chart of seafloor Upwelling occurs notably in the spring depths around when these wind and water currents Farallon NWR work together and saturate ocean waters with nutrients brought up from Black the deep ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Report Part 1
    Alcatraz Island Golden Gate National Recreation Area Physical History PRE-EUROPEAN (Pre-1776) Before Europeans settled in San Francisco, the area was inhabited by Native American groups including the Miwok, in the area north of San Francisco Bay (today’s Marin County), and the Ohlone, in the area south of San Francisco Bay (today’s San Francisco peninsula). Then, as today, Alcatraz had a harsh environment –strong winds, fog, a lack of a fresh water source (other than rain or fog), rocky terrain –and there was only sparse vegetation, mainly grasses. These conditions were not conducive to living on the island. These groups may have used the island for a fishing station or they may have visited it to gather seabird eggs since the island did provide a suitable habitat for colonies of seabirds. However, the Miwok and Ohlone do not appear to have lived on Alcatraz or to have visibly altered its landscape, and no prehistoric archeological sites have been identified on the island. (Thomson 1979: 2, Delgado et al. 1991: 8, and Hart 1996: 4). SPANISH AND MEXICAN PERIOD (1776-1846) Early Spanish explorers into Alta California encountered the San Francisco Bay and its islands. (Jose Francisco Ortega saw the bay during his scouting for Gaspar de Portola’s 1769 expedition, and Pedro Fages described the three major islands –Angel, Alcatraz, and Yerba Buena –in his journal from the subsequent 1772 expedition.) However, the first Europeans to record their visit to Alcatraz were aboard the Spanish ship San Carlos, commanded by Juan Manuel de Ayala that sailed through the Golden Gate and anchored off Angel Island in August 1775.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St SESSION January 7, 2003 —— December 8, 2003
    NUMERICAL LISTS OF DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS of the 108th CONGRESS, 1st SESSION January 7, 2003 —— December 8, 2003 No. SENATE DOCUMENTS Serial No. 1. [Blank.] ........................................................................................................................................... 2. Report of Secretary of Senate, October 1, 2002–March 31, 2003. 2 pts ................................... 14803, 14804 3. Semiannual report, Architect of Capitol, Oct. 1,2002–March 31, 2003 ...................................... 14805 4. Tributes delivered in Congress to Chaplain Lloyd John Ogilvie ................................................. 14805 5. Memorial Addresses and Tributes in honor of Daniel Patrick Moynihan ................................... 14805 6. Authority and Rules of Senate Committees, 2003-2004 ............................................................... 14805 7. Memorial Addresses and Other Tributes in honor of Strom Thurmond ...................................... 14805 8. Report of Secretary of Senate, April 1–Sept. 30, 2003. 2 pts .................................................... 14806, 14807 9. [Blank.] ........................................................................................................................................... 10. Semiannual report, Architect of Capitol, April 1–Sept. 30, 2003 ................................................ 14808 11. Appropriations, budget estimates, etc., statements, 108th Congress, 1st Session. 2 vols...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION The purpose of this book is twofold: to provide general information for anyone interested in the California islands and to serve as a field guide for visitors to the islands. The book covers both general history and nat- ural history, from the geological origins of the islands through their aboriginal inhabitants and their marine and terrestrial biotas. Detailed coverage of the flora and fauna of one island alone would completely fill a book of this size; hence only the most common, most readily observed, and most interesting species are included. The names used for the plants and animals discussed in this book are the most up-to-date ones available, based on the scientific literature and the most recently published guidebooks. Common names are always subject to local variations, and they change constantly. Where two names are in common use, they are both mentioned the first time the organism is discussed. Ironically, in recent years scientific names have changed more recently than common names, and the reader concerned about a possible discrepancy in nomenclature should consult the scientific literature. If a significant nomenclatural change has escaped our notice, we apologize. For plants, our primary reference has been The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, edited by James C. Hickman, including the latest lists of errata. Variation from the nomenclature in that volume is due to more recent interpretations, as explained in the text. Certain abbreviations used throughout the text may not be immedi- ately familiar to the general reader; they are as follows: sp., species (sin- gular); spp., species (plural); n.
    [Show full text]
  • Rancho Corral De Tierra- Palomares
    Rancho Corral de Tierra- Palomares Biological Report & Study Compilation July, 2001 Peninsula Open Space Trust Rancho Corral de Tierra-Palomares Biological Report Contents I. Overview & Summary Biological Report Introduction 1 Physical Description 2 Landscape History 3 Geographic Location 6 Parcel Description & Topography 7 Geology and Soils 9 Climate 9 Current Biological Status Summary Biological Importance 10 Beyond the Borders 11 Unique Biological Resources Plant Communities 12 Special Status Plants 13 Animal Communities 14 Special Status Animals 15 II. Biological Description of Rancho Corral de Tierra Methodology 16 Unique Biological Communities 19 Special Status Species Key 22 Plants 23 Reptiles 30 Birds 31 Amphibians 32 Invertebrates 33 Mammals 35 Fish 35 Watershed Delineations & Resources 37 Martini creek watershed 38 Daffodil Valley drainage 41 Farallone drainage 42 Montara creek watershed 44 Sunshine Valley drainage 46 San Vicente creek watershed 47 Denniston creek watershed 50 Other watersheds and drainages 53 Alien and Invasive Species 54 List of Identified Biological Reports & Sources 58 Rancho Corral de Tierra-Palomares I. Overview As the morning mist clears along Hwy. 1, residents who commute daily and first-time travelers experience wonder as the breathtaking views are revealed around the last curve and rocky outcropping that begin the descent into Montara from Devil’s Slide. Mountain cliffs meet crashing waves as vistas of sea and mountains whiz by. Most coastside visitors, blissfully unaware of the efforts to preserve such beauty stretching along the Pacific Coast, lack an identification and understanding of this special area and the flora and fauna it supports. To enjoy and appreciate its stunning views are enough without delving into the past and its legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield
    Regional Transit Map Transit REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM To To Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Greyhound BART, AC Transit FA FA 19th Street Oakland BART: FA BART, AC Transit Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters Fairfi eld and Suisun Transit SolanoExpress is Solano SolanoExpress is Solano BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Fairfield 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: County’s intercity transit connection. County’s intercity transit connection. BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, (FAST) is the local transit system Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit SolanoExpress routes connect cities SolanoExpress routes connect cities Transit To Sacramento for Fairfi eld and Suisun City and also Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon within the county and provide service within the county and provide service Calistoga Readi- operates many of the SolanoExpress (Operated by FAST) (Operated by SolTrans) Handi Powell Street BART: Transportation Ride Van Calistoga BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans regional routes. Please visit www.fasttransit. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. San Francisco Caltrain at 4th & King: Dixon Windsor Deer Caltrain, Muni, Amtrak CA Thruway org or call 707-422-BUSS (707-422-2877) for For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or Park Transbay Temporary Terminal: Guerneville AC Transit, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, 80 visit www.solanoexpress.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano Express Bus Routes Transit Information Pleasant Hill Station Area Contra Costa Centre
    Fare Information effective January 1, 2016 Senior3 Adult/ (65+) Youth2 County Connection & (6-64) For more detailed information about BART Disabled service, please see the BART Schedule, BART 1 Transit CASH FARES (exact change only) Regional Transit Map System Map, and other BART information REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM displays in this station. Regular Ride $2.00 $1.00 To To Express Ride (900 series route numbers) $2.25 $1.00 Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS PREPAID FARES Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland ® 4 $2.00 $1.00 Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Clipper Cash Value Greyhound BART, AC Transit 19th Street Oakland BART: 5 $3.75 $1.75 BART, AC Transit Day Pass Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Discount Regular/Express 20-Ride Pass N/A $15.00 Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Commuter Card (20 Regular+BART Transfer-Rides) $40.00 N/A Pleasant Hill 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and 6 $60.00 N/A Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit East Bay Regional Local 31-Day Transit To Sacramento Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon 6 $70.00 N/A Calistoga Readi- County Connection (CCCTA) effective January 1, 2016 East Bay Regional Express 31-Day Handi Powell Street BART: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Fare Information Station Area Ride BART Red* Ticket
    [Show full text]