Rethinking Early East Asian History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rethinking Early East Asian History Rethinking Our Notions of “Asia” Rethinking Early East Asian History By Charles Holcombe “Asia” and National Identities From that initial Bronze Age center of civilization in what we There may be Asian-Americans in the United States, but as Ronald now call China there emerged a broadly shared East Asian vocabu- Takaki shrewdly commented, “there are no Asians in Asia, only peo- lary for conceptualizing identity. This is a point that scholars who ple with national identities, such as Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Indi- specialize in tracing the modern origins of nationalism in East Asia an, Vietnamese, and Filipino.”1 Asia is simply too enormous, span- may not themselves sufficiently appreciate. Not only do such schol- ning the better part of the entire Old World, and too diverse, to serve ars commonly approach the subject from a present-day perspective, as a very meaningful label. In fact, according to Robert Marks, on but, paradoxically, they generally do so already packaged within the the eve of the American Revolution, in “1775, Asia produced about box of the nation, as studies of nationalism within the context of a 80 percent of everything in the world.”2 Moreover, “Asia” is a con- particular nation, such as China or Vietnam. This tendency may even cept of Western origin unfamiliar to many of the people who actual- be especially strong in the study of an East Asian region where the ly lived there. As both word and idea, “Asia,” is a legacy of the (national) languages necessary for serious research require intensive ancient Greeks. In East Asia there was absolutely no pre-modern specialized training. The modern Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and native equivalent term.3 Even within Europe, John M. Hobson Vietnamese languages are very different from each other, and serve argues, it was not until the eighteenth century that a vision of a dis- to draw sharp, often nearly impermeable, disciplinary barriers tinctive “Western Civilization” descended in a continuous line from between scholars who study the different East Asian cultures. Ancient Greece and fundamentally different from the Oriental Other, Languages and Historical Understanding first began to be imagined.4 Certainly pre-modern East Asians did In pre-modern times, however, the situation was somewhat different. not think of themselves as “Asians.” There was, to a significant extent, a single common written language Yet they did not necessarily think of themselves exactly as Chi- in use throughout all of East Asia, which we call literary, or classi- nese, Japanese, Korean, or Vietnamese in the fully modern sense cal, Chinese. This was the language of the Confucian classics, the either. There is a fairly broad consensus among specialist scholars, East Asian version of the Buddhist Tripitaka, and of the majority of There may be Asian-Americans in the United States, but as Ronald Takaki shrewdly commented, “there are no Asians in Asia, only people with national identities, such as Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Indian, Vietnamese, and Filipino.” however counter-intuitive it may seem to a popular audience, that all serious writing in China until the early twentieth century.8 Within the phenomena of nation-states and nationalism emerged only in rel- China, this language long enjoyed a near monopoly of written com- atively recent times. Nationalism began in Europe, and, perhaps munication—more so, for example, than Latin ever did within the especially, in Europe’s overseas colonies struggling for indepen- Roman Empire, where Greek still commanded much prestige, and dence in the Americas (including, notably, the future United States).5 other alternatives such as Syriac and Coptic coexisted.9 Beyond The nationalist contagion then spread to East Asia in the late nine- China proper, literary Chinese was also initially almost the only teenth century. It might plausibly be argued, therefore, that prior to written language in use everywhere else in East Asia. Even the stan- roughly 1900, few people in East Asia held precisely our familiar dard “native” Japanese name for Japan itself, Nihon, was apparently modern national identities either.6 chosen during the seventh century for the meaning of the Chinese So how did pre-modern East Asians conceive of themselves? For characters, with which it is still today normally written: , many, their self-identifications must have been primarily local: with “origin of the Sun.”10 village or region. But East Asia is also truly one of the world’s most To be sure, new ways of writing the different Japanese, Korean, ancient centers of civilization. If educated pre-modern Chinese were and Vietnamese spoken languages did gradually develop, but, even as inclined to imagine their standards of civilization were universal (not late as the nineteenth century, literary Chinese was still very much the unlike the attitude of some Americans today towards the supposedly prestige language of writing in Korea and Vietnam. Even in more universal appeal of our culture and ideals), concepts equivalent to the remote Japan, the last catalog compiled for the Sh¬gunal library in country or state had already appeared in China thousands of years 1864–1866 still contained some 65 percent Chinese material.11 Since ago.7 It is deceptively easy to project modern images of the nation then, literary Chinese has been rejected or abandoned everywhere, back into the primordial past in East Asia. Who can deny that China even in China itself, and replaced by modern national vernaculars. is a very old country? The problem comes when we begin to ponder For many modern East Asians, much of the written record of their the multitude of Chinese countries that existed in the past. own past has truly become a “foreign country.” 9 While Chinese archeologists have been slow to embrace the “Out of Africa” theory of human origins, within China it is now fashionable to emphasize the multiple origins of Chinese civilization. My emphasis here on the widespread pre-modern importance of would even go so far as to say historical error is a crucial factor in the Chinese written language may seem offensively Sino-centric, the creation of a nation; thus the progress of historical studies is and derogatory to the other East Asian cultures. For perspective, often a danger for national identity”—Tony Judt comments that recall that in Western Europe prior to 1500 some three-quarters of all “Unlike memory, which confirms and reinforces itself, history con- books were still published in Latin.12 Yet the European sense of tributes to the disenchantment of the world. Most of what it has to national dignity appears unimpaired by the tremendous weight of offer is discomforting, even disruptive . .”16 Of course, uncritical Europe’s Greco-Roman heritage. And, if Latin may be pronounced a popular history commonly serves instead a comforting (if also some- “dead” language today, the same could also be said of literary Chi- times covertly sinister) agenda. As the fraudulent Wizard of Oz nese. In fact, in modern times, Japanese has been more influential. A explains succinctly in the current Broadway hit musical Wicked, stream of Japanese vocabulary items—often newly minted as trans- “Where I come from, we believe all sorts of things that aren’t true— lations of such exotic Western words as “telephone,” “nation,” or we call it . ‘history.’”17 “communism”—were imported from Japanese into the Chinese lan- The once heated debate between proponents of the diffusion guage beginning in the late nineteenth century.13 The present-day theory of the origins and spread of civilization, and those who People’s Republic of China is no more identical to the Han dynasty favored the idea of more local native origins, seems to have been of Emperor Wu than today’s Italy is to the Rome of Augustus. resolved now in an unexpected way: by DNA.18 The compelling Rather than some unchanging and permanently “static” China, mod- genetic evidence suggests that all human beings came originally ern Chinese history has been punctured repeatedly by profound revo- from Africa, and settled the planet only relatively recently, within lutionary ruptures, some of which have involved language itself. the last hundred thousand years or so.19 Globalization, then, has been To be sure, however, even the modern spoken and written Chi- part of the human story from the beginning, and there are no true nese languages, though much reformed in the twentieth century, are permanent “natives” anywhere, except, possibly, somewhere in clearly still incarnations of the same 3,000-year-old archaic language Africa. For the rise of the historical world civilizations, an overly- that appears on the most ancient inscriptions discovered by archeolo- simplistic opposition between alternative “diffusionist” or “autono- gists in China. This remarkable linguistic and literary continuity mist” models has been challenged by a more nuanced conception of forms the spine of an enduring Chinese cultural continuum. Further- an ongoing process of dialectical interaction.20 While Chinese arche- more, Chinese is the most commonly spoken language in the world ologists have been slow to embrace the “Out of Africa” theory of today, which can hardly be said of Latin. But, I would submit, that if human origins, within China it is now fashionable to emphasize the there has been continuity, there has also been much change in multiple origins of Chinese civilization.21 China’s past. Even ancient China was far from static. China was first unified into a single centralized country by the Different Chinas Qin dynasty in 221 BCE, but the extent to which it thereafter long If the quintessentially Japanese sport of sumo wrestling existed in remained internally very much a multi-ethnic empire is not often suf- China a millennium before it did in Japan,14 and if many institutions, ficiently appreciated.
Recommended publications
  • China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States
    Order Code RL32688 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Updated April 4, 2006 Bruce Vaughn (Coordinator) Analyst in Southeast and South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Wayne M. Morrison Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Summary Southeast Asia has been considered by some to be a region of relatively low priority in U.S. foreign and security policy. The war against terror has changed that and brought renewed U.S. attention to Southeast Asia, especially to countries afflicted by Islamic radicalism. To some, this renewed focus, driven by the war against terror, has come at the expense of attention to other key regional issues such as China’s rapidly expanding engagement with the region. Some fear that rising Chinese influence in Southeast Asia has come at the expense of U.S. ties with the region, while others view Beijing’s increasing regional influence as largely a natural consequence of China’s economic dynamism. China’s developing relationship with Southeast Asia is undergoing a significant shift. This will likely have implications for United States’ interests in the region. While the United States has been focused on Iraq and Afghanistan, China has been evolving its external engagement with its neighbors, particularly in Southeast Asia. In the 1990s, China was perceived as a threat to its Southeast Asian neighbors in part due to its conflicting territorial claims over the South China Sea and past support of communist insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do East and Southeast Asian Cities Differ from Western Cities? a Systematic Review of the Urban Form Characteristics
    sustainability Article How do East and Southeast Asian Cities Differ from Western Cities? A Systematic Review of the Urban Form Characteristics Tzu-Ling Chen 1,*, Hao-Wei Chiu 2,3 and Yu-Fang Lin 4 1 Department of Urban Development, University of Taipei, Taipei 11153, Taiwan 2 Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University, New Taipei 23741, Taiwan 4 Department of Landscape Architecture, National Chiayi University, Chiayi 60004, Taiwan; v.yfl[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-02-2871-8288 (ext. 3110) Received: 11 February 2020; Accepted: 17 March 2020; Published: 19 March 2020 Abstract: The Fifth Assessment Report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5) revealed that the scale of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Asian cities is similar to those from developed economies, which are driven predominantly by economic growth. Due to variations in geographic and climatic contexts, culture and religion, living style and travel behavior, governance and institutions, and a wide range of density and land use mixes, there are significant variations in urban form patterns across Western and Asian cities. This paper uses a systematic review, which is a critical interpretive synthesis methodology, to review keywords of studies related to urban form among East and Southeast Asian cities. From 3725 records identified through database searching, 213 studies were included in qualitative analysis. The results show that, although the population density in built-up areas is higher, annual population density is declining significantly in East and Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Colours of Chinese Regimes: a Panchronic Philological Study with Historical Accounts of China
    TRAMES, 2012, 16(66/61), 3, 237–285 OFFICIAL COLOURS OF CHINESE REGIMES: A PANCHRONIC PHILOLOGICAL STUDY WITH HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS OF CHINA Jingyi Gao Institute of the Estonian Language, University of Tartu, and Tallinn University Abstract. The paper reports a panchronic philological study on the official colours of Chinese regimes. The historical accounts of the Chinese regimes are introduced. The official colours are summarised with philological references of archaic texts. Remarkably, it has been suggested that the official colours of the most ancient regimes should be the three primitive colours: (1) white-yellow, (2) black-grue yellow, and (3) red-yellow, instead of the simple colours. There were inconsistent historical records on the official colours of the most ancient regimes because the composite colour categories had been split. It has solved the historical problem with the linguistic theory of composite colour categories. Besides, it is concluded how the official colours were determined: At first, the official colour might be naturally determined according to the substance of the ruling population. There might be three groups of people in the Far East. (1) The developed hunter gatherers with livestock preferred the white-yellow colour of milk. (2) The farmers preferred the red-yellow colour of sun and fire. (3) The herders preferred the black-grue-yellow colour of water bodies. Later, after the Han-Chinese consolidation, the official colour could be politically determined according to the main property of the five elements in Sino-metaphysics. The red colour has been predominate in China for many reasons. Keywords: colour symbolism, official colours, national colours, five elements, philology, Chinese history, Chinese language, etymology, basic colour terms DOI: 10.3176/tr.2012.3.03 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryan Kristopher Miller
    Bryan Kristopher Miller Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Department of Archaeology Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany Tel: +49 (0) 3641 686-742 [email protected] ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT Research Associate: Faculty of History, University of Oxford (Nomadic Empires Project) 2015-2019 Research Fellow: Gerda Henkel Foundation (Research Fellowship) 2014-2015 Postdoctoral Research Fellow: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (at Bonn University) 2011-2014 Postdoctoral Research Fellow: American Center for Mongolian Studies/Henry Luce Foundation 2010-2011 Visiting Assistant Professor: Rowan University, History Department 2009-2010 Adjunct Professor: State University of New York – FIT, Art History Department Spring 2009 Teaching Assistant: University of Pennsylvania, East Asian Languages and Civilizations 2005-2006 Research Assistant: University of California, Los Angeles, Art History Department 1997-2000 Teaching Assistant: University of California, Los Angeles, Institute of Archaeology 2000 Teaching Assistant: University of California, Los Angeles, East Asian Studies Department 1998 Research Assistant: J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, Antiquities Department 1998-1999 ACADEMIC EDUCATION Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, East Asian Languages and Civilizations 2009 Dissertation: Power Politics in the Xiongnu Empire Committee: Paul Goldin, Nicola Di Cosmo, Bryan Hanks, Victor Mair; Nancy Steinhardt M.A., University of California, Los Angeles, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology 2000 Thesis: The Han Iron Industry: Historical Archaeology of Ancient Production Systems Committee: Lothar von Falkenhausen, David Schaberg, Charles Stanish Ex., National Chengchi University, Taiwan, Russian Language Department 2002-2004 Ex., Duke Study in China Program, Capital Normal University/Nanjing University 1996 B.A., Washington University in St. Louis, Archaeology & East Asian Studies (Dean’s List) 1997 ACADEMIC AFFILIATIONS Research Affiliate: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Foundations of Eastern and Western Thought
    Comparative Foundations of Eastern and Western Thought Daniel Memmi UQAM Montreal, QC, Canada [email protected] Abstract: Modern science and technology originated in Western Europe within a specific culture, but they have now been adopted and developed by several Eastern countries as well. We analyze the features of Western culture that may explain the rise of modern science with its associated economic development. A comparative analysis of Eastern cultures will then help us evaluate how far could contemporary science be successfully integrated within very different cultures. In this way, we try to estimate the importance of the cultural framework for the development of science and technology. “East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet” (Kipling) Prologue I usually live in Montreal, a North-American city with a somewhat European atmosphere. Though known for ferociously cold winters, it is in many ways a typical example of Western urban life: a grid-like design in most of the city, a narrower layout in the historical center, but on the whole streets are straight and wide, with clearly marked pavements, and crossing each other at right angles. Buildings are laid out along the streets like a marching army. The general impression is of open, easily navigable space, because the city design is so obvious. But I now write this in an older neighborhood (with a rather dilapidated look) of a middle-size Japanese town, where I have been living for some time. The place is 1 bewildering for a Westerner: the layout seems essentially haphazard. Dwellings and buildings are thrown together in a jumble without any discernible plan, traditional houses mixing with more recent apartment buildings, small stores and workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • HST 363: History of Premodern East Asia
    1 HST 363 Dr. Yixin Chen Fall 2014 Office: MO 230 Class Hours: TR 11:00–12:15 Office Hours, TR 12:30-2 Classroom: MO 206 History of Premodern East Asia COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course surveys East Asian history from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century, with emphasis on the development of Chinese and Japanese civilizations. It pursues following themes: the founding of Chinese culture; the making of Chinese bureaucratic state and gentry society; the rise of Ming-Qing commercialized economy; the growth of Japanese culture; the establishment of Japanese shogunate system and feudal society, and the role of Korea in East Asia. It tries to show how Chinese and Japanese in traditional times developed their social, political, religious and cultural values that continue to define their people’s worldviews today. For detailed course objectives and learning goals, please refer to http://uncw.edu/hst/learninggoals.html. This course adopts Patricia Ebrey and Anne Walthall, Pre-Modern East Asia to 1800: A Cultural, Social, and Political History as the main textbook. The other supplementary readings are used for class discussions on in-depth understanding of the East Asian history and for students to write essays. The course combines lectures, readings, discussions, and visual materials. Although no extensive background knowledge is presumed, students should be aware that the required readings include a large number of unfamiliar names and terms. TEXTBOOKS (AVAILABLE AT THE BOOKSTORE): Patricia Ebrey and Anne Walthall. Pre-Modern East Asia to 1800: A Cultural, Social, and Political History Arthur Waley. Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China Robert Van Gulik.
    [Show full text]
  • East Asian Integration Towards an East Asian Economic Community
    ADBI Working Paper Series EAST ASIAN INTEGRATION TOWARDS AN EAST ASIAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY Christopher M. Dent No. 665 February 2017 Asian Development Bank Institute Christopher M. Dent is a professor of international political economy at the University of Leeds, United Kingdom. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. ADB recognizes “China” as the People’s Republic of China; “Hong Kong” as Hong Kong, China; and “Korea” as the Republic of Korea. Suggested citation: Dent, C. M. 2017. East Asian Integration Towards an East Asian Economic Community. ADBI Working Paper 665. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/east-asian-integration-towards-east-asian-economic- community Please contact the authors for information about this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibility of Mongolia to Regional Integration North East Asia Based on Sustainable Urban Development
    Possibility of Mongolia to regional integration North East Asia based on sustainable urban development Eleventh Intergovernmental Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia S.Davaanyam, Head of Human settlement and Regional Study and Planning, CDC, MCUD Ulaanbaatar 2018.10.02 Main development indicators of NEA countries GDP, by billion US$ Population, Land, by GDP per Annual Countries by millions, million km2, capita, US$, 2007 2016 growth, % 2016 2016 2016 2007/2016 Russia 146,8 17,098 1299,7 1283,2 -0,1 8748 Far East Russia 6,2 6,169 89,5 1005 Siberia 19,3 5,145 169,6 3743 China 1373,5 9,563 3552,2 11199,1 21,5 8123 Japan 126,7 0,378 4515,3 4939,4 0,9 38894 South Korea 51,4 0,100 1122,7 1411,2 2,6 27539,0 North Korea 25,1 0,120 25,000 25,0 0,0 1000 Taiwan, Chinese 23,5 0,036 490 529,6 0,8 22598 Mongolia 3,1 1,564 4,235 11,2 16,4 3686 Hong Kong, China 7,3 0,003 211,6 320,7 5,2 43681 total NEA 1636,056 28,862 11220,74 19719,4 7,6 12,053 Source: World Bank. 2017. World Development Indicators Trade is the most fundamental of cooperation for Mongolia. NEA countries role on the world and regional intra-trade, 2016 Source: ITC (International trade Centre). 2017. Trade statistics of world countries Total trade share in the Regional intra-trade share, % world, % Export Import Total share of share of share of Share Share Share World country's country's country's in NEA in NEA in NEA 100 100 100 export to import trade export import trade NEA from NEA with NEA China 13.2 9.9 11.5 28.2 31.1 29.5 38.1 35.6 36.9 Russia 1.8
    [Show full text]
  • Mongolia's Contribution to North-East Asia Partnership for Implementing
    Mongolia’s contribution to North-East Asia partnership for implementing SDGs Ch.Khashchuluun PhD, Professor, National University of Mongolia Former head of National Development Agency and Chairman of Development Bank of Mongolia Key factors for growth: dynamic stability of democracy • Stable yet dynamic political system • Parliamentary republic since 1992, first in Central Asia, • most recent parliament elections in 2016, next president’s elections in 2017 • Consensus based decision making • Coalitions (formal and informal) • The Long term Sustainable Development Vision of Mongolia (2016): example of consensus building, ratified by all main parties Constitution 1992 1993 1996 1997 1998 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2012 2016 2020 Kh. P. O c h i r b a t N.Bagabandi N.Bagabandi N.Enkhbayar President Ts.Elbegdorj Battulg a Coaliti Government MPP DP MPP Coalitions MPP on MPP DP Justice Parliament MPP 71/76 DP 50/76 MPP 72/76 no majority 37/76 MPP 45/76 Coalition 3 Mongolia enjoys free and open access to information • Information networks • 135 newspapers • 99 magazines • 84 radio stations • 166 TV stations (60 domestic channels in Ulaanbaatar) • no censorship • All major foreign TV channels, HBO, Discovery, CCTV, Arirang, NHK, etc Mongolia’s SDC 2030 • Mongolia's sustainable development concept (SDC - 2030) was adopted on February, 2016 by the Parliament of the country. This document is Mongolia's long-term national development policy for the next 15 years, and for this policy to be implemented successfully as well as effectively, it is important to ensure the correlation between mid-term policies and programs and their implementation in national and local level.
    [Show full text]
  • East Asia and Central Asia Enhancing International Connectivity and Ensuring Comprehensive and Sustainable Development
    Activities and Initiatives by Region East Asia and Central Asia Enhancing International Connectivity and Ensuring Comprehensive and Sustainable Development JICA Programs in East Asia and Central Asia (Fiscal 2017) Total value of JICA programs Composition (Unit: millions of yen) ratio East Asia Central Asia and the Caucasus Mongolia 47,662 98.2% Total: 26,717 China 861 1.8% (Unit: millions of yen) Central Asia and the Caucasus Uzbekistan 10,534 39.4% zhstn Azerbaijan 6,116 22.9% Monol Tajikistan 3,199 12.0% Kyrgyz Republic 10.9% Geor 2,901 Uzbe stn rz Republ c Armenia 1,872 7.0% Armen Georgia 1,802 6.7% Turmen stn T stn Turkmenistan 183 0.7% Azerb n Kazakhstan 111 0.4% Ch n The figures show the total value of JICA programs East Asia in each country including Technical Cooperation (Training Participants, Experts, Study Teams, Provision Total: 48,523 of Equipment, JOCV and Other volunteers, and (Unit: millions of yen) Other costs), Finance and Investment Cooperation (Disbursements), and Grants (Newly concluded G/As) in fiscal 2017. Note: • Figures exclude JICA’s cooperation for multiple countries and/or multiple regions and international organizations. Regional Issues Fiscal 2017 Initiatives JICA operates ODA in 10 developing countries of the East Since the 1990s, Japan has been engaging with the Central Asian and Central Asian region: China, Mongolia, the five Central Asian countries and Mongolia as the top bilateral donor. These Asian countries, and the three Caucasus countries. countries appreciate the contributions of Japan and have high Nine of the countries, except China, are former socialist states expectations for future cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition of Inner Asian Groups in the Central Plain During the Sixteen Kingdoms Period and Northern Dynasties
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2018 Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties Fangyi Cheng University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, and the Asian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cheng, Fangyi, "Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties" (2018). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2781. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2781 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2781 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties Abstract This dissertation aims to examine the institutional transitions of the Inner Asian groups in the Central Plain during the Sixteen Kingdoms period and Northern Dynasties. Starting with an examination on the origin and development of Sinicization theory in the West and China, the first major chapter of this dissertation argues the Sinicization theory evolves in the intellectual history of modern times. This chapter, in one hand, offers a different explanation on the origin of the Sinicization theory in both China and the West, and their relationships. In the other hand, it incorporates Sinicization theory into the construction of the historical narrative of Chinese Nationality, and argues the theorization of Sinicization attempted by several scholars in the second half of 20th Century. The second and third major chapters build two case studies regarding the transition of the central and local institutions of the Inner Asian polities in the Central Plain, which are the succession system and the local administrative system.
    [Show full text]
  • Weaponry During the Period of Disunity in Imperial China with a Focus on the Dao
    Weaponry During the Period of Disunity in Imperial China With a focus on the Dao An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty Of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE By: Bryan Benson Ryan Coran Alberto Ramirez Date: 04/27/2017 Submitted to: Professor Diana A. Lados Mr. Tom H. Thomsen 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 List of Figures 4 Individual Participation 7 Authorship 8 1. Abstract 10 2. Introduction 11 3. Historical Background 12 3.1 Fall of Han dynasty/ Formation of the Three Kingdoms 12 3.2 Wu 13 3.3 Shu 14 3.4 Wei 16 3.5 Warfare and Relations between the Three Kingdoms 17 3.5.1 Wu and the South 17 3.5.2 Shu-Han 17 3.5.3 Wei and the Sima family 18 3.6 Weaponry: 18 3.6.1 Four traditional weapons (Qiang, Jian, Gun, Dao) 18 3.6.1.1 The Gun 18 3.6.1.2 The Qiang 19 3.6.1.3 The Jian 20 3.6.1.4 The Dao 21 3.7 Rise of the Empire of Western Jin 22 3.7.1 The Beginning of the Western Jin Empire 22 3.7.2 The Reign of Empress Jia 23 3.7.3 The End of the Western Jin Empire 23 3.7.4 Military Structure in the Western Jin 24 3.8 Period of Disunity 24 4. Materials and Manufacturing During the Period of Disunity 25 2 Table of Contents (Cont.) 4.1 Manufacturing of the Dao During the Han Dynasty 25 4.2 Manufacturing of the Dao During the Period of Disunity 26 5.
    [Show full text]