BI Annual Report 2005.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Subject of the Russian Federation)
How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country. -
ICARM) in the NOWPAP Region
NOWPAP POMRAC Northwest Pacific Action Plan Pollution Monitoring Regional Activity Centre 7 Radio St., Vladivostok 690041, Russian Federation Tel.: 7-4232-313071, Fax: 7-4232-312833 Website: http://www.pomrac.dvo.ru http://pomrac.nowpap.org Regional Overview on Integrated Coastal and River Basin Management (ICARM) in the NOWPAP Region POMRAC, Vladivostok 2009 POMRAC Technical Report No 5 МС TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................................4 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Introduction to Regional Seas Programme and NOWPAP Region.............................................................6 1.2 Brief introduction of Integrated Coastal and River Basin Management in the NOWPAP Region...........................................................................................................................7 1.3 Importance of ICARM procedures for the Region and necessary ICARM strategy in the NOWPAP Region...............................................................................................7 1.4 Geographical scope of NOWPAP area....................................................................................................9 1.5 Institutional arrangements for developing this overview..........................................................................10 2 Part I. -
Environmental Lead Contamination in the Rudnaya Pristan–Dalnegorsk
Environmental Lead Contamination in the Rudnaya Pristan – Dalnegorsk Mining and Smelter District, Russian Far East Margrit C. von Braun1, Ian H. von Lindern2, Nadezhda K. Khristoforova3, Anatoli H. Kachur3, Pavel V. Yelpatyevsky3, P. Vera Elpatyevskaya3, Susan M. Spalinger1 1Environmental Science and Engineering Programs, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844 2TerraGraphics Environmental Engineering Inc., 121 S. Jackson St., Moscow Idaho, 83843 3Pacific Geographical Institute, Russian Academy of Science, Vladivostok, Russia Abbreviated title: Env. Lead Contam. in Russian Lead Smelter District Person to whom correspondence should be sent: Margrit von Braun, Ph.D., P.E. Director, Environmental Science and Engineering Programs University of Idaho, Morrill Hall 207 Moscow, Idaho 83844-3006 Phone: 208-885-6113 Fax: 208-885-4674 e-mail: [email protected] 1 Abstract The results of 30 years of studies by a Russian scientific team and a preliminary survey of soil metals concentrations conducted by a joint US-Russian research team in a remote mining and smelting region of the Russian Far East (RFE) indicate significant soil lead contamination and a high probability of childhood lead poisoning. Lead concentrations in residential gardens and yards (500 – 4600 mg/kg) and in roadside soils (500 – 23000 mg/kg) exceeded USEPA guidance for remediation. Preliminary biokinetic estimates of mean blood levels suggest children are at significant risk of lead poisoning from soil/dust ingestion. Samples of other potentially important pathways, such as air, surface and ground water, paint, interior dust and garden produce, as well as pediatric and occupational blood lead levels, are needed. An assessment of the industry’s ability to reduce exposure levels through modernization and more effective control of emissions and materials handling should also be accomplished. -
12 Cases of Cleanup and Success
Blacksmith Institute’s World’sBlacksmith Worst Institute’s Polluted PlacesWorld Report Worst 2009 Polluted Places Report 2009 12 Cases of 12Cleanup Cases of and Success CleanJust a few small, Up bright and spots among Success over a billion lives affected. Produced in collaboration with Green Cross Switzerland Remediation // Legislation // Innovation // Education This document was prepared by the staff of Blacksmith Institute in partnership with Green Cross Switzerland with input and review from a number of experts and volunteers, to whom we are most grateful. Primary Authors Meredith Block, MPA, David Hanrahan, MSc Contributions Cyrille Adam, EdM, Richard Fuller, Sasha Hoff, Stephan Robinson, PhD, Bhaskar Sen Gupta, PhD, Jennifer Spiegler, Budi Susilorini, Ellie Tang, MPA Special Thanks To: Jack Caravanos, Nathalie Gysi, Brian Wilson, Anne Reiderer, Ira May; the members of the Technical Advisory Board (see appendix for listing), Blacksmith Institute staff, Christina Bigler, Valodia Shevtsov, Don Feil, Michael Benedict, Wolfgang Schimpf, Magdalene Sim, Pam Zarella, Triplesmart and Gustavo Cejas. For questions, comments and feedback, please contact Blacksmith Institute in New York City at the following address: Blacksmith Institute 2014 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10035 +1 (646) 742 0200 [email protected] Media inquires should be directed to Magdalene Sim in New York at [email protected] Media inquiries in Europe should be directed to Nathalie Gysi at Green Cross Switzerland: Green Cross Switzerland Fabrikstrasse 17 8005 Zurich, Switzerland +41 (0) 43 499 13 10 [email protected] This report is available online at www.worstpolluted.org World’s Worst Polluted Places 2009 3 Table of Contents I. Letter from Blacksmith Institute Founder ................................................. -
Russian Federation
NEASPEC-NEAMPAN1 Management Plans and Strategies at Selected Sites of NEAMPAN in the Russian Federation 1 This report was prepared by SAVELYEV, Anatoly (Center for International Project), ORLOVA,Tatiana (National Scientific Center of Marine Biology Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Science), SUTYRINA,Svetlana (Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Reserve), and KACHUR,Anatolii (Institute of Geography of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences) Table of Contents 1. Basic information of the target MPA .......................................................................................................... 3 2. Background of strategic/management plan of the target MPA ................................................................. 13 3. Objective of MPA management plan ........................................................................................................ 19 4. Key contents of the management plans ..................................................................................................... 21 4.1. Links between monitoring/assessment results and management ........................................................ 24 5. NEAMPAN sites studies ........................................................................................................................... 26 5.1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 26 5.2. Sikhote-Alin Nature Biosphere Reserve ............................................................................................ -
Russian Environmental Problems
Conflict Studies Research Centre Russi an Series 06/41 Defence Academy of the United Kingdom Russian Environmental Problems Dr Mark A Smith Key Points * Russia inherited a grave environmental legacy from the Soviet Union. Air and water pollution are extremely high and have had an extremely deleterious effect on health. * Spending on environmental protection is very low, and is insufficient to clean up the environment. Most major projects are funded by international institutions * Efforts to uncover information regarding pollution at nuclear and military facilities is hampered by the state’s concern to maintain security. * Environmental controls and monitoring capacity have been reduced since 2000. The state places more emphasis on economic growth than countering pollution. Consciousness of environmental issues amongst the population is relatively low. * NGOs play a major role in attempting to raise consciousness and to lobby for environmental conservation and controls. The leadership however is generally averse to such activities, particularly if they have international connections. 06/41 Russian Environmental Problems Dr Mark A Smith This paper will give a brief overview of the general environmental situation in the Russian Federation, and the post-Soviet leadership’s policies towards the environment and pollution.1 A General Overview of the Environmental Situation The Soviet Union bequeathed the Russian Federation an unenviable environmental and ecological legacy. The emphasis that the Soviet system had placed on heavy industry, largely for the purposes of national security, meant that environmental concerns took second place to the need for industrial development. Little concern was expressed during the Soviet period over environmental issues, although it would be wrong to say that there was complete silence. -
Assessment of Mercury Releases from the Russian Federation
Arctic Council Action Plan ACAP to Eliminate Pollution of the Arctic H g Assessment of Mercury Releases from the Russian Federation Reduction of Atmospheric Mercury Releases from Arctic States Russian Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Atomic Supervision Danish Environmental Protection Agency 1 Arctic Council Action Plan to Eliminate Pollution of the Arctic (ACAP) Reduction of Atmospheric Mercury Releases from Arctic States Assessment of Mercury Releases from the Russian Federation Prepared for the Arctic Council by: Russian Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Atomic Supervision Danish Environmental Protection Agency COWI A/S 2 Preface The results of the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme summarising decades of envi- ronmental research in the Arctic region stressed the fact that humans and the environment in the Arctic region currently experience alarming exposures to mercury, among a number of other toxic pollutants. Within the framework of the Arctic Council, the eight Arctic Countries agreed on taking actions to contribute to the reduction of exposures to a number of priority pollutants, including mercury, in the Arctic region. The Arctic Council issued an action plan including 6 projects on priority pollut- ants. Denmark is the co-ordinator for the project on mercury. The overall objective of the project is to contribute to a reduction of mercury releases from the Arctic countries; partly by contributing to the development of a common regional framework for an action plan or strategy for the reduction of mercury emissions, and partly by evaluating and se- lecting one or a few specific point sources for implementation of release reduction measures. In addition, the results of the project may be used to improve the inputs for modelling of long-range transport of mercury. -
A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. Mckinleyville, CA
Logging practices. Despite years of intensive industrial log- Whatever happened to Hyundai’s logging ging, 75 percent of the krai remains forested. However, the operation in Svetlaya? composition has changed and the quality of those forests Perhaps no joint venture in the RFE has received more declined considerably. In the past fi fty years, more than half attention from the international community than Svetlaya of the Korean pine forests in the rfe have been destroyed and PRIMORSKY Timber Joint Venture. In 1991, Hyundai Corporation (South replaced by broadleaved species. Overlogging occurs in many Korea) and two Primorsky regional timber enterprises of the ash and spruce forests, most of which are in protected (Primorlesprom and Terneiles) signed a 30-year agree- riverine forest zones, largely in the upper mountain belt of the ment with the Primorsky Krai government. In 1992, the southern Sikhote-Alin. Logging techniques, particularly in Hyundai joint venture tried to get access to log the Upper the spruce forests, have caused profound long-term ecosystem Bikin basin. The Bikin River is the largest old-growth transformations, frequently causing irrevocable changes in watershed in Primorsky Krai. Despite protests from the forest cover. Selective logging, usually in the form of high- Udege and environmentalists, then Primorsky Krai Gover- grading, is the most widely practiced method, conducted on nor Kuznetsov gave rights for Hyundai to log 500,000 cu. 62 percent of the territory and contributing about half of the m annually.9 The Udege protested and won; the Primorsky total timber harvest. By law, under this logging method, for- Krai Duma passed a law overturning the governor’s deci- esters are required to leave intact seedlings up to 10 to 14 cm sion. -
Research Article Concentrating Mill Wastes Are the Source of Pollution
Hindawi Journal of Chemistry Volume 2020, Article ID 6570126, 12 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6570126 Research Article Concentrating Mill Wastes are the Source of Pollution of Human Environment and Natural Ecosystems with Heavy Metals: A Case Study in Primorsky Krai, Russian Federation Irina A. Tarasenko,1,2 Alexander V. Zin’kov,2 Aleksei S. Kholodov ,1 Muhammad Riaz,3 Valeriy I. Petukhov,2 Nikita Y. Popov,1 Aristidis Tsatsakis,4 and Kirill S. Golokhvast 2,5 1Far East Geological Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia 2Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690950, Russia 3Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan 4School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion 71003, Greece 5Pacific Geographical Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690041, Russia Correspondence should be addressed to Aleksei S. Kholodov; [email protected] Received 13 November 2019; Revised 6 March 2020; Accepted 9 May 2020; Published 1 June 2020 Academic Editor: James Barker Copyright © 2020 Irina A. Tarasenko et al. -is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Elevated contents of hazardous elements in natural ecosystems are often associated with human activities. Significant quantities of these elements, including heavy metals, are concentrated in tailings. -e goal of the study was to assess the mineralogical and geochemical features of the old tailings of the decommissioned Krasnorechenskaya concentrating mill (located in Primorsky Krai, Russian Federation), which was processing complex tin-polymetallic and silver-lead-zinc ores, the chemical features of tailings pond waters, and the extent of environmental impact on the nearby Rudnaya river. -
REPORT North-East Asian Marine Protected Areas
Management Plans, Monitoring and Assessment of Marine Protected Areas Assessment of Marine Protected Monitoring and Management Plans, Network Areas Asian Marine Protected North-East North-East Asian Marine Protected Areas Network Management Plans, Monitoring and Assessment of Marine Protected Areas North-East Asian Marine Protected Areas Network Management Plans, Monitoring and Assessment of Marine Protected Areas Management Plans, Monitoring and Assessment of Marine Protected Areas Copyright © NEASPEC 2021 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NEASPEC. The report is published without formal editing. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is acknowledged. The NEASPEC Secretariat would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. Layout and Design: DocuFriends Contents Contents Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................................................................................xii Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................................................................................................xiv Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................................................xv -
Spent Nuclear Fuel/Radioactive Waste Management
The brochure from the Risk and Safety Issue narrates the impact of nuclear- and radiation- hazard sites on the environment of the Far Eastern Region and describes the radiation safety status, potential emergencies and their consequences, as well as preparedness of appropriate organizations and local authori-ties for effective actions on public protection in the case of radiological emergencies. This brochure addresses a wide range of ex- perts in environmental or radiation safety; decision-makers in the field of environmental or public protection in the case of radiological emergencies; public environmental organi- zations; students of higher education institutes, and those who are interested in the issues of stable development of Russian Far East. Translated by A.V. Troitskaya Risk and Safety The Far East Nuclear Technologies and Environment Moscow 2008 UDK 621.039:58 The Far East. Nuclear Technologies and Environment. — M., Komtekhprint Pub- lishing House. 2008. 71 p. IBRAE Editorial Board of the Risk and Safety Issue: RAS academician A. A. Sarkisov, RAS corresponding member L. A. Bolshov, professor R. V. Arutyunyan, and D. Sc. I. I. Linge. IBRAE Team of Authors: Ph. D. E. M. Melikhova (supervisor), Ph. D. I. L. Abalkina, D. Sc. S. V. Antipov, L. M. Vorobieva, D. Sc. V. L. Vysotsky, Ph. D. V. P. Kiselev, Ph. D. I. A. Ossipiants, S. V. Panchenko, and D. Sc. E. K. Khandoghina. Reviewers: I. A. Veselov, Deputy Director of RF EMERCOM’s Emergency Prevention De- partment, and A. M. Agapov, Head of Rosatom’s Nuclear/Radiation Safety Directorate. This brochure addresses a wide range of experts in environmental or radiation safety; decision-makers in the field of environment or public protection in the case of radiological emergencies; public environmental organiza- tions; students, and those who are interested in the issues of stable development of Russian Far East. -
Environment and Health Risks: a Review of the Influence and Effects of Social Inequalities
Environment and health risks: of social inequalities Environment and health risks: a review of the influence and effects of social inequalities ABSTRACT This report serves as a background document for the policy brief on social and gender inequalities in environment and health that was prepared for the Fifth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health (Parma, Italy, 10–12 March 2010). It provides an overview of the currently available evidence on the influences and effects of social and gender inequalities on environmental health risks. The evidence has been compiled for six environmental health challenges (air quality, housing and residential location, unintentional injuries in children, work-related health risks, waste management and climate change) as well as for gender-related inequalities and children’s exposure. Additional chapters present interventions on child-related environmental inequalities and social inequalities in environmental health risks in the Russian Federation. Although the evidence base on social inequalities and environmental risk is fragmented and data are often available for few countries only, it indicates that inequalities are a major challenge for environmental health policies. The review confirms that people living in adverse socioeconomic conditions in Europe can suffer twice as much from multiple and cumulative environmental exposures as their wealthier neighbours, or even more. Similarly, inequalities in exposure to environmental threats have been identified for vulnerable groups such as children and elderly people, low-education households, unemployed persons, and migrants and ethnic groups. Only little evidence is available indicating that in some circumstances, well-off and advantaged social groups are more at risk. Irrespective of developmental status, environmental inequalities can be found in any country for which data are available.