\AN OPTIMAL WITHDRAWAL POLICY FOR
SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL FROM ON-SITE STORAGE,
by
David Wesley Swindle, Jr.
A Thesis submitted to the graduate Faculty of the
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
in
Nuclear Science and Engineering
APPROVED:
H. A. Kursted Co-Chairman
a J. A. Nachlas, Co-Chairman G. H. acer
August 1977
Blacksburg, Virginia ib SEs Voss 97"? S94ny C.K ' ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The assistance of Dr. H. A. Kurstedt, Chairman, Nuclear Science and Engineering, and Dr. J. A. Nachlas, Industrial Engineering and
Operations Research, in selecting and developing the technical aspects of this paper is gratefully acknowledged. A special thanks is due the author's wife Carolyn, without whom the motivation to complete this work nor the typing of this work would have been possible.
Li TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS»
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES* »*
LIST OF FIGURES e s e e ° e e » e . e e * * e e e a *
INTRODUCTIONs * © * © * © © © © © © © e© © © ee ee
A. Background and Motivation * * * + ** * *« se «+s
B. The Problem and the Objective * *+ + + * * * « + »
The Approach» e e e e e e ° e ° * e e e e ° ° e ° C.
Results ee © e® ® © © e e© 8@» © @® © © e@ © ® © #© &© 8 @ D.
DESCRIPTION OF THE SPENT+FUEL STORAGE PROBLEM «+ «+ « » 11
A. An Overview of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle * * © * » » 11
Current Uncertainties Facing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle in the United States* * © * *+ © © © © « « « 16
Reprocessing of Nuclear Fuel in the United States 19
Examination of the Role of Nuclear Energy in Meeting America's Energy Needs» » + © * + ¢ «© « « 23
DERIVATION OF THE SPENT FUEL WITHDRAWAL MODEL « « « « 27
A. Characteristics of the Spent=Fuel Withdrawal Problem- 27
B. The Dynamic Programming Formulation «+ * + «+ « » . 29
Cc. The Hitchcock Problem Formulation * * + + * «© « « 35
D. The Linear Programming Formulations * * +¢ +© + « «» 40
THE EXAMINATION AND EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF THE SPENT~FUEL WITHDRAWAL PROBLEM «+ + + « « « «© «© © « « « 46
A. Characteristics of Nuclear Reactors in Regard to Nuclear Fuel + «© « «© 2» «© © «© «© © «© © © » © «© « 46
Lii TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
B. Spent-Fuel Supply and Demand Projections* * * * + °«
C. The Measure of Effectiveness - Profitability
e e per Assembly e P e e e ° e ° ° e a e e e . e e 63
D. Storage Costs * * * * * * © © © © © © © © # © # # » 81
APPLICATION OF THE SPENT=FUEL*WITHDRAWAL MODEL* »° 85
A. Model and Data Summary’ *- * * * * * * 2 2 e+ * © © & 85
B. Implementation of the Model and Procedural Summary: 88
RESULTS © © ee ee tee we ee he he eh we te te 100
A. Optimistic Reprocessing Scenarioe* * * * * * * * & » 100
B. Realistic Reprocessing Scenario * * * * * * * © » » 106
C. Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario a 107
CONCLUS IONS e e ° e e e e e . ° e ° e e e ® e e e e e ° 118
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 120
BIBLIOGRAPHY* * * * * * © © © © © © © © © © © © ¢ # « ¢ 122
10. APPENDIX ° _ @ @ @ © e@© © #@ © © © © © © © @© © #@ © © @© #© @& 2@ 125
11. VITA e e e e e e e . e e e e e e e e ® e e e e e e . ° 244
iv LIST OF TABLES
Table Title Page
2.1 U.S. Electric Power Statistics 1947-1974- + >» 24
2.2 Installed Nuclear Capacity* + * + * «© © © s « « 26
3.1. Unit Measures of Profitability for the Linear
Programming Problem eo © ss» © © © © © @ e@© #© © 8 @ 42
4.1 LWR Fuel and Discharge Data + * * * * + © # « « 47
4.2 Spent-Fuel Discharge Characteristics» + * « « »« 50
4.3 Average Composition of Plutonium Available for Recycle- 51
4.4 Installed Nuclear Capacity + + + + + + + e+ © ee eos 54
4.5 Discharge Quantities of Spent-—Fuel Per Gigawatt (electric) ee © e# © e © e© # @ e © © @ ee © @ @© @ @ 55
4.6 Spent-Fuel Supply Projections by Reactor Mix: »- 56
4.7 Reprocessing Plant Capacity Schedule* + * + «= » 59
4.8 Reprocessing Capability - Optimistic Scenario * 60
4.9 Reprocessing Capability - Realistic Scenarios + 61
4.10 Reprocessing Capability - Pessimistic Scenarios 62
4,11 Uranium Price Projections + + * * © «© «© #© « « « 73
4.12 Separative Work Cost Projection * * * * * * « « 75
4.13 Uranium Conversion Costs Forecast * * * * « « « > 76
4.14. Plutonium Value for Uranium Feed and Separative Work Equivalents* *© «© « «© © © «© © «© » « © © « « 83
4.15 On-Site Storage Costs Per Assembly~Year + + « » 84
5.1 Profitability Per Assembly - Westinghouse PWR > 89
5.2 Profitability Per Assembly B & W PWRe « «= « e 90
5.3 Profitability Per Assembly - Combustion Engineering 91
Cy 5.4 Profitability Per Assembly GE BWR/6 e e ° ® . e e 92 LIST OF FIGURES
Figure— Title
2.1 The Light Water Reactor Fuel Cycle + * * * * * * © &
4.1 Spent-Fuel Assembly Demand Rate - Westinghouse PWR >
4.2 Spent-Fuel Assembly Demand Rate - Babcock and Wilcox
PWR. ° e e ° e e e a s e s e e e e e e e e e * e * s 65
4.3 Spent-Fuel Assembly Demand Rate —- Combustion Engineering PWRe = * * © © * © © #© © #© © © #© © # © @ 66
4.4 Spent-Fuel Assembly Demand Rate - General Electric
BWR/6-° s ° e e e e e e e ° . e e ° e ° e e . ° ° ° ° 67
5.1 Profitability Per Assembly - lst Discharge
Westinghouse PWR * 2 e «© e@ e # @ 7. © © © 8 © @ @ @© @ | 93
5.2 Profitability Per Assembly ~ lst Discharge General Electric BWR/6 * e©= ee © © ee e@ # © @ ee ee 8 © # @ e@ © 28 94
5.3 Profitability Per Assembly - Ist Discharge No Plutonium Value; Westinghouse PWRe * * * * © » © @ » 97
5.4 Profitability Per Assembly - lst Discharge No Plutonium Value; General Electric BWR/6+ * + «© + » » 98
6.1 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +20Z SWU, +20% Storage, -20% Uranium, -20% SWU, -~20% Storage Costs + « © © © « «© «© © « © © «© # 8 © »® 101
6.2 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR +207 Uranium Coste 7 © @ e@ e © © © © 8® #© #© © e 2&© # # 102
6.3 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; Base Cost+ *© «© © © «© «6 « « « « » 104
6.4 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +204 Uranium Cost+ + + « « + « « 105
6.5 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario-Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; Base Costs « «+ *© + « « «© © « « « 108
vi Figure . Title Page
6.6 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario —- Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Costs* * * + + * * © © #109
6.7 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario —- Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, +20% Storage, ~20% Uranium, -—20% SWU, ~20% Storage Cost * * * * * « « e © © © © © © © © we hl elhlcelUC UL
6.8 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario —- Westinghouse PWR +207 Uranium Cost * * * * © © # # # # e e e © © © © # s& ¢ 11l
6.9 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * * * © * © © *© #113
6.10 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * * * ° © © «114
6.11 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% Uranium, +20% SWU, +202Z Storage, -20% Uranium, -20% SWU, -20% Storage Costs* * * * * * * * 115
. 6.12 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic. Reprocessing Scneario; Westinghouse PWR +2074 Uranium Cost ee 8© © © © © © © © © © 8 ©» &© &© © © @ 116
6.13 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scneario; Westinghouse PWR +20% SWU Cost ° * * * © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © [U7
vii 1. INTRODUCTION
A. Background and Motivation
In order for an industrialized country like the United States to
continue to grow economically, abundant energy at a reasonable cost
must be available. Otherwise, as was recently evidenced by the Arab
Oil Embargo, there will be a decrease in economic growth and an in-
crease in inflation. As a result of these problems, which could con-
ceivably reduce the economic prosperity of this nation, the United
States government has stressed energy self-reliance and conservation.
To obtain this self-reliance, the energy needs of the nation must be
satisfied from domestic resources. In particular, of the domestic
sources of energy available, only two fuels, coal and uranium, are
abundant in the sense of providing a low-cost, high-energy resource.!3
Upon examining the primary uses of these two fuels, coal and uranium
are more suited for the production of electricity than for any other
purpose./3 ‘However at present, when considering environmental,
economic, and societal points of view, the energy obtained from uranium
appears more acceptable for the generation of electricity than coal-
burning and other technologies .?2
To specifically note the electrical energy picture in the United
States, generation of electricity is predicted to be the fastest grow-
ing area of energy use.13 Examining past history, approximately 13 per
cent of the fuel utilized in the United States in 1947 was for the production of electricity. By 1970, this figure had increased to 25 per cent. By the year 2000, it is predicted that between 40 and 50 per cent of the fuel consumed in the U.S. will be for the production of
electricity./3 An important fact to consider is that as demand for
electrical energy increases, there will be an associated demand in the
resources necessary to produce this electricity. It is evident that
oil and gas will become less important as supplies diminish and prices
increase. Coal will take on a much greater responsibility. However, coal will not be able to do the job alone. At least through the year
2000 and probably well beyond that time, the nuclear option has to be a
Major contributor to the U.S. energy mix if it expects to have an
adequate available electrical power supply.”
Several studies examined the current and projected role of nuclear
power, and concluded that nuclear power must grow from its 1976 share
of 6.9% of total U.S. generating capacity to almost 50% by the year
2000.2 -.A study, conducted by Arthur D. Little, Inc. in February 1977,
forecast a fourfold increase in installed nuclear generating capacity
between 1975 and 1985.2 This represents the nuclear role as 21% of
the U.S. total generating capacity in 1985. Independent as well as
government studies indicate that nuclear power must increase through
this fourfold range if it is to be a major contributor of needed
electrical energy in the year 1985 and beyond.
Noting the above and many other similar projections, it seems
that the nuclear industry.is expanding and growing quickly. But
providing nuclear energy depends upon the fuel cycle, and there are
several problems to be resolved. Specifically, at the front end of the
cycle, there is a concern about the possibility of a uranium supply
shortage. At the enrichment stage, the Nuclear Fuel Assurance Act, which would have brought private capital into uranium enrichment, was
disapproved by Congress. However, at the back end of the cycle, the
situation is much worse. Despite the fact that proven technologies
exist for managing spent nuclear fuel,?® the political debates and
indecisions have lead to an executive order?’ stipulating that spent—
fuel be stored and that a moritorium on reprocessing be enforced until
the economic, political, and environmental implications are investigated
further. As a result of this interim prohibition on reprocessing,
recent governmental policy decisions dictate that strategies for
managing spent nuclear fuel be developed. In particular, a key problem
to be resolved includes the determination of optimal inventory with-
drawal policies for spent nuclear fuel from on-site storage pools to
respond to the re-initiation of reprocessing.
B. The Problem and Objective
The most serious problems within the nuclear industry today occur
at the back end of the fuel cycle. The present standstill of repro-
cessing in the U.S., and the uncertainties surrounding adequate
reprocessing capacity in the future, can be attributed at least in part
to the lack of an appropriate government regulatory policy declaration.
Despite the fact that the current Presidential administration has
declared a moratorium on reprocessing and plutonium recycle, analysts,
although pessimistic, are convinced that reprocessing will be available
in the future. 40 As a result, the examination of any phase of the nuclear fuel cycle should take this likelihood into account. A review of the literature has lead to the support of the con-
clusions reached in a 1976 report by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
In this report, the Commission expressed the situation quite clearly:
"Tt has been assumed in the past that the uranium and plutonium in spent fuel would be recovered and recycled. Therefore, detailed analyses of the technology of spent fuel disposal (disposition) are not to be found in the literature."!5, 36
Every year, each of the commercial nuclear reactors operating in
the U.S. replaces between 25 and 40 tonnes of spent—fuel in the form of
60 to 200 fuel assemblies.!4* Current reactor designs utilize the majority of the U-235 in the fuel augmented by the burnup of approxi-
mately 0.2% of the U-238.2% The burnup of the U-238 results in the
production of plutonium, a valuable fuel that can be recovered
through reprocessing. Unfortunately, these power systems usually
extract less than one per cent of the energy theoretically available
from uranium fuel. At best, the energy recovered is only about two per
cent. !* As a result of these low energy yields along with the
depletion of fissile fuel material, accumulation of fission products,
and other unfavorable irradiation effects, the fuel must be replaced
periodically. This replacement of nuclear fuel creates a stockpile of
spent-fuel at the reactor site. The direction the spent-fuel follows
at this point is in limbo and awaits resolution.
In order to close the back end of the fuel cycle, questions with
regard to the disposition of irradiated spent-fuel must be answered.
-Fuel discharged from light water reactors contains significant quantities of fissile material in the form of uranium and plutonium isotopes. These fissile quantities are equivalent to about 50% of the original amount loaded into the reactor.29 As a result, energy system forecasters in the past, well aware of the value of the residual uranium and plutonium, have assumed that this valuable fuel would be recycled into reactors.2+ However, as has been previously noted, no recycling has occurred on a commercial scale in the U.S. since the shutdownof Nuclear Fuel Service's West Valley Plant. The continued delay in the expected re-initiation of reprocessing has forced reactor operators to store spent-fuel beyond the normal "cooling-of £" period in which short-lived radioactive fission products decay to manageable levels. This unexpected long term storage at on-site pools has lead to the accumulation of spent~fuel in the form of numerous assemblies of varying ages. Also the lack of reprocessing capability (capacity and availability) in recent years has resulted in present and foreseeable spent-fuel storage capacity shortages. Therefore, it is imperative that strategies for managing spent nuclear fuel be developed, particu- larly if the questions, primarily societal and economic, surrounding nuclear power are to be answered and justified in an appropriate manner.
The objective of this effort is to address a key problem that must be resolved in determining strategies for managing spent nuclear fuel.
Specifically, the objective is to determine an optimal inventory with- drawal policy (or policies) for stored spent nuclear fuel from on-site facilities. The policies identified will indicate the optimal response to the re-initiation of reprocessing. A model that addresses the problem is developed and presented along with the associated detailed derivation. Results from analyzing and solving the spent-fuel-with- drawal model are also presented and the resulting specific policies are indentified.
This effort is being examined from the utility perspective as opposed to that of a fuel reprocessor. This allows the maximum economic gain from fuel recycle to be examined from the reactor operator's point of view. This in effect will contribute to the minimization of the nuclear fuel cycle costs.
C. The Approach
The spent-fuel-withdrawal problem involves the interaction of the spent~fuel generation, time and capacity dependent reprocessing demand, and the marketability of valuable products available from spent-fuel.
The amount of spent-fuel generated is dependent upon the type of reactor utilizing the nuclear fuel and the associated mode of oper- ation. In the United States, the pressurized water reactor (PWR) and boiling water reactor (BWR) serve as the primary nuclear power systems commercially available today. As of January 1, 1977 the installed nuclear capacity of 41,887 megawatts-~electric (MWe) was divided between
24 BWRs and 35 PWRs. Each of these reactors have capacities varying from 48 to 1180 MWe.3° These reactors, produced by four major vendors of nuclear steam supply systems (Nsss) in the United States today, discharge spent-fuel in varying quantities and of various compositions.
Therefore, the characteristics of the spent nuclear fuel are important in analyzing the economic disposition of spent-fuel. Demand for spent-fuel can be examined from the standpoint of reprocessing availability and capacity. Probable dates for the re- initiation of reprocessing are projected on the basis of recent independent 2° and government!? studies.
The application of the spent-fuel-withdrawal model is done on a per-reactor basis. The examination includes systems from each of the four major NSSS suppliers. Specifically, three PWR systems and one BWR system serve as representative models of the light water reactor (LWR) industry. Since the analysis is conducted on a per-reactor basis, all parameters (supplies, demands, and associated costs) are based upon the unit-reactor basis. This is appropriate because the recommended policy is for a single reactor system. However, the determined policies are applicable globally to all existing and planned nuclear plants.
The spent-fuel-withdrawal problem is a time~dependent decision problem that is influenced by the uncertainties in the growth of nuclear power capacity, spent-fuel supply and demand, and the avail- ability of spent-fuel reprocessing. The determination of an appro- priate decision policy depends primarily upon the following:
i. the. time at which a particular decision has to be made,
2. the determination of an appropriate measure of effectiveness
that will lead to an interpretable solution, and
3. the determination of spent-fuel characteristics that allow for
the choice of an appropriate measure of effectiveness.
It is necessary that the decision as to the selection of an inven- tory withdrawal policy be based upon comparisons between the value of spent-fuel currently in inventory and that continually being generated.
The key to determining an appropriate policy is therefore to define and determine the economic gain realizable in spent-fuel and examine this gain dynamically. For this problem, an appropriate mathematical model is developed. However, the key to successful optimization of this model lies in the interaction of a computer oriented data set and the economic characteristics of spent~fuel. The data set must be designed to reflect the time-varying nature of the nuclear fuel cycle.
'- The primary purpose of this study is:
1. the identification and understanding of the key elements that
define the spent-fuel inventory withdrawal problen,
2. the development of an appropriate optimization model describ-
ing the dynamic behavior of spent-~fuel,
3. the implementation of an appropriate computer-oriented code
incorporating the developed mathematical model and associated
economic measures of effectiveness, and
4. the determination of appropriate cost-effective strategies
yielding definable withdrawal policies based upon the time-
dependent behavior of nuclear power systems and their gener-
ation of spent-fuel.
The thesis comprises eight chapters. Following the introductory remarks, additional material on the nuclear fuel cycle and uncer- tainties facing the nuclear industry today are found in Chapter 2.
Also included in the second chapter are examinations of the status of reprocessing in the U.S. and the role that nuclear energy has to play in meeting America's energy needs during the remainder of this centruy. Chapter 3 presents the derivation of the spent-fuel-withdrawal model from three perspectives. First, modeling is secured through a dynamic programming approach. Second, the dynamic model is transformed into a
Hitchcock problem designed to be solved as a minimum cost flow problem; and finally, modeling is completed through the derivation of a linear programming representation of the Hitchcock formulation. An economic measure of effectiveness is evaluated in Chapter 4 based upon potential economic gain that is realized by the recycle of fissile isotopes.
Along with the determination of an appropriate measure of effectiveness considering both uranium and plutonium recycle and with uranium only recycle, are spent-fuel supply and demand projections per Gigawatt
(electric) of installed nuclear capacity. Chapter 5 addresses the application and solution of the lLinear-transportation-modeled-spent—fuel- withdrawal model. Optimization results are presented in Chapter 6 and are organized according to the reprocessing scenarios examined. Con- clusions follow in Chapter 7 with the summary and recommendations discussed in Chapter 8. Additional results and a listing of the computer-oriented data-generating code are included in the appendix.
D. Results
A detailed discussion of the results is found in Chapter 6. Also, complete tabular results for all analyses are included in Appendix A.
These results present definitive policies that serve as foundations for management decisions upon the re-initiation of reprocessing. The principal results of this study are presented below:
1. Given recycle of both uranium and plutonium, and an associated 10
organized market for each, the analyses conducted indicate
that a last-in-first-out (LIFO) policy yields the maximum
economic benefit. This policy is shown to be optimal based
entirely upon the value associated with recovered uranium and
plutonium.
In the absence of marketability for plutonium (i.e. uranium
recycle only), the profitability of spent-fuel is minimized
and no discernable policy is determined that uniquely opti- mizes the recoverable value in spent-fuel over time. However
the solutions appear to lean towards a modified LIFO policy.
The results of this effort indicate that if the issues
surrounding plutonium recycle and reprocessing are not settled
as soon as possible, the valuable isotopes remaining in spent~-
fuel become economically unattractive to recover. This is
particularly true as storage and handling costs increase with
time awaiting resolution of the controversy, and as the probability for assembly failures increase while held in
storage, thus increasing storage costs. 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SPENT-FUEL STORAGE PROBLEM
A. An Overview of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
The nuclear fuel cycle is a sequence of operations and facilities which include all of the processes necessary for the utilization of nuclear fuel. This is separated into three categories that consist of the front end stages, irradiation stage, and the tail or back end stage. 3! This sequence of operations perform the functions necessary to process the nuclear fuel from the uranium ore through the reactor, to eventual disposal.
The front end of the nuclear fuel cycle consists of those processes necessary to fabricate fuel assemblies suitable for use in nuclear power systems. The steps of the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle shown.in Figure 2.1, and consists of mining and milling of natural uranium, conversion of uranium mill product to uranium hexaflouride
(UFg), enrichment of uranium, and the fabrication of fuel assemblies.
The mining and milling operations occur primarily in the western United
States. This is due to the fact that the majority of the domestic uranium ore is found in the sedimentary sandstone and mudstone deposits of the Colorado Plateau, the Wyoming Basins, and the Gulf Coastal Plain of Texas.23 Once mined, uranium ore is. processed in a mill which uses a number of conventional mechanical and chemical processes to separate the uranium from the host rock and other minerals. The uranium is recovered as yellowcake, a uranium salt containing between 70 and 80 per cent U30g.3!}
11 12
The Light Water Reactor Nuclear Fuel Cycle
oo EES > Sh URANIUM MINES CONVERSION ENRICHING CONVERSION and MILLS TO UF¢ y TO FUEL
: / RECOVERED URANIUM TAILS / URANIUM STOCKPILE J preterene ne eee i f
! T=ost afoot ae ( PLUTONIUM REACTOR ‘Oe \ eeee, REPROCESSING FUEL STORAGE a ' WASTE STORAGE ~«------”
Figure 2.1
13
The U30g concentrate extracted from the ore is then converted to
the compound uranium hexafluoride (UF¢) - The process utilized is the
fluoride volatility process which involves three steps and concludes
with a high-temperature fluoridation step. 3! This conversion from
yellowcake is necessary in preparation for the enriching process.
Following conversion to UF 6» the uranium must be enriched in its concentration of the fissile isotope U-235 in order to be effectively
used in existing light water reactors. This is usually done by means
of the gaseous diffusion process, a process which is based upon the
difference in rates at which gases of different molecular weights |
diffuse through a porous barrier. This process separates the natural
uranium feed stream in the form of UF, into two output streams:
enriched product and depleted uranium tails. The required product
enrichment for current generation reactors varies between 2.5 and 4 per
cent uranium-235. The remainder of the enriched uranium fuel consists
almost entirely of the fertile isotope, uranium~238.
The final step in the front end of the fuel cycle is fabrication.
The enriched uranium produced in the enrichment plant is converted to
pellets of uranium dioxide (U0,). The assembly of these pellets into a
fixed structure, when completed, yields a fuel assembly ready for
irradiation in the reactor.
The second stage, irradiation of nuclear fuel, is the step in
which energy is obtained from the fuel through the fission process.
Each assembly in the reactor is burned at a specific power that may be
the result of a complex decision process aimed at an overall economic
optimization to allow for a total burnup.! Irradiation of the fuel 14 occurs over a 3~ to 4-year period once the nuclear plant is operating at designed power levels. During this time, each kilogram of fuel will produce approximately 2000 million BTU resulting in the generation of
200,000 kw-hr (electric).3!
The remaining series of stages shown in Figure 2.1, temporary spent- fuel storage, reprocessing of. spent-fuel, and waste storage, constitutes the tail or back end of the fuel cycle. This segment consists of those processes and activities required to dispose of the radioactive wastes produced and to reclaim the remaining uranium and/or plutonium found in the discharged fuel.
Storage of spent-fuel is the first activity related to the back end of the fuel cycle after the irradiation in the reactor. In addition to uranium and plutonium, spent-fuel contains a variety of fission products. Most of these fission products are radioactive and constitute the principal sources of heat and radiation. During the storage period, the radioactivity and heat output decrease approximately according to the law pee, where t. is the time after removal from the reactor.2° Minimal storage time, on the order of 120 to 180 days, is necessary to allow for cooling of the spent-fuel assembly and the decay of short-lived fission products. The purpose of this cooling period is primarily for safety reasons to allow the volatile isotope iodine-131, with a half-life of 8.14 days, to decay to manageable levels.?
Following storage for cooling, the spent-fuel is shipped to a reprocessing facility to reclaim the residual uranium and plutoniun, and to concentrate the radioactive fission products. In general, the reprocessing of spent-fuel consists of three steps: head-end treatment, 15
solvent extraction, and product purification. During the head-end
treatment, fuel elements are chopped into short sections and the fuel
material is dissolved out by nitric acid. The uranium and plutonium
are extracted from the fuel-acid solution using an organic solvent
such as tributyl phosphate (TBP) dissolved in a kerosine~like hydro-
carbon. + Through countercurrent mixing of organic and acid aqueous
‘solutions in vertical columns or centrifugal contactors, the substances
more soluble in one solution than in the other can be efficiently
separated.
Upon discharge from the reprocessing facility, radioactive wastes
have to be solidified into an insoluble, non-leachable form. The
solidified waste is packaged and placed in permanent repositories.
This long term solution is designed to isolate wastes in geologic
formations whose stability has been demonstrated over hundreds of
thousands of years. 3!
Note however that today, the once operable reprocessing and waste
storage segments of the nuclear fuel cycle are inoperable. This
portion of the fuel cycle is an area of primarily political and
economic, not technological uncertainties.38 As a result of this
inoperability of reprocessing and waste disposal, the fuel cycle has
not been closed.
The conclusion reached by this overview of the nuclear fuel cycle
is that uranium, the primary circulatory constituent of the fuel cycle,
can be limited by the capability to process it at both the "front" and
"back" ends. Therefore, if the energy from nuclear fission is to 16 contribute to the nation's energy needs, it is imperative that the fuel cycle be closed.
B. Current Uncertainties Facing the Nuclear
Fuel Cycle in the United States
Since the nuclear fuel cycle is a dynamic system, there is no constant relationship between the amount of uranium mined and the amount of uranium charged into nuclear power plants.3! In particular, the requirements at the front end of the fuel cycle for uranium and enrichment are affected by the resources available and the recovery efficiency of uranium and plutonium from the tail end.
At present, the nuclear industry is faced with continuing concerns for proliferation and waste disposal while at the same time having to cope with problems of an underdeveloped fuel cycle.°> According to a recent study by the Energy Research and Development Administration
(ERDA),2° the dilemma challenging the nuclear industry at the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle relates primarily to the availability of uranium resources and enrichment capacity to support the light water reactor (LWR) industry. The conclusions reached by this study indicate that in most phases of the fuel cycle for light water reactors, there exist present and/or foreseen constraints on the growth of the fission energy option. Specifically, there are insufficient known or projected supplies of uranium to support the growth of the LWR industry beyond about 1990-1995. Also established was that there currently exists insufficient enrichment capacity to support the projected growth of the industry beyond 1983. 17
The expected cumulative demand for uranium in the form of U30, ‘in the United States is expected to increase from the 1976 demand of
27,900 short tons to. over 2,194,800 short tons by the year 2000 if no recycle occurs. This figure can be reduced to 1,740,000 short tons in the year 2000 if plutonium and uranium recycle is allowed. These figures represent needed uranium resource if the diffusion plants operate at a 0.3% tails assay.°! As of August 1976, total uranium resources available at less than $35 per pound recovered were determined to be 1,275,000 short tons in the form of 130g. Of this amount, only 270,000 short tons are proven reserves with the remainder being only potential supplies.!? As can be immediately determined, a difference exists by a factor of two between the estimated cumulative demand for the uranium needed beyond the total consumption thru 1976 and the available resource. Note also that over half of the projected supply is speculative.
Also, it is not clear how adequate enrichment capacity will be supplied to support the nuclear industry beyond 1986. The ERDA diffusion plant complex is currently expanding and uprating through the
Cascade Improvement Program (CIP) and the Cascade Uprating Program
(cup).*! Included in present ERDA expansion plans is the capacity addition of 8.75 million SWU/yr to the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion
Plant. In total, upon completion of the CUP, CIP, and the Portsmouth add-on, total U.S. enrichment capacity will be 36.75 million SWU/yr. tt
Projections of annual separative work requirements in the United States exceeds that available, including new capacity, as early as 1985.27 »31 18
The contributing factor to much of the speculation is that processes at
the front end are highly investment-intensive with lead times ranging
from eight to ten years.
The most significant current uncertainties requiring solution are
those. which influence the back end of the fuel cycle. At present,
the back end is at a standstill because of regulatory uncertainties.
The conclusion reached by the Energy Research and Development Adminis-
tration (ERDA) in a recent study is that unless prompt and effective actions are taken for the safeguarding and handling of nuclear fuels,
the use of fission energy will be limited.39 ERDA also points out that
since the objection to closing the fuel cycle is primarily political and societal, there is concern as to whether or not industry, on its own, will be able to carry through with the commercialization of the
“back end". 39
The basic problem facing closure of the fuel cycle is realized as soon as the fuel is discharged from the reactor. As a result of a lack of a definitive decision to settle the controversy surrounding reprocessing and waste storage, utilities are forced to store their discharged fuel in on-site storage pools. This creates a problem due to the accumulation of spent~fuel beyond designed and regulatory capacity. This inability has also led to a delay in the issuance of construction permits for the reprocessing and mixed-oxide fuel fabrication plants that would be needed to initiate plutonium recycle.
On August 21, 1974, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) issued for comment.a draft report entitled "Generic Environmental Statement on the Use of Recycle Plutonium in Mixed Oxide Fuel in Light Water Cooled 19
Reactors (GESMO)". The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) view and the controversy surrounding the recycle issue has created diffi- culties in closing the LWR fuel cycle in the U.S.?4 The delay in the issuance of the Final-GESMO, which was published in August 1976, has also adversely influenced the licensing of construction permits for reprocessing and mixed-oxide fuel fabrication plants. The resolution of the questions surrounding nixed-oxide fuel utilization are currently awaiting acknowledgement while in the process of a public hearing.@!
Unless intelligent decisions are made now, the breeder reactor program along with millions of dollars spent towards developing fission technology will be in jeopardy.
C. Reprocessing of Nuclear Fuel
In The United States
At present, there is no operating capability in the United States for the processing of spent commercial nuclear fuels. The state of regulatory uncertainty has prevented the nuclear industry from implementing plans to proceed with the required technologically proven programs necessary to close the nuclear fuel cycle. Unlike the breeder reactor, there is no technical necessity that mandates the use of reprocessing with light water reactors. Instead, the benefits of reprocessing the spent-fuel from light water reactors are argued to be three: an increase in the energy available from uranium resources, a reduction of the costs of nuclear power, and an easing of the problem of radioactive waste disposal.*® 20
Interest in the reprocessing of nuclear fuels developed among
' suppliers of nuclear power equipment who felt the need to assure their
customers of a closed fuel cycle. The chemical companies had the
necessary technological skill and background, and the oil companies
hoped to expand their operations into other energy sources. 3
The first plant to be built for reprocessing light water reactor
fuels, was the West Valley, New York plant operated by Nuclear Fuel
Services, Inc. Nuclear Fuel Services (now owned jointly by the Getty
Oil Company and the Skelly Oil Company), designed and constructed a
reprocessing plant with a capacity of 300 tons of spent-fuel] per year.?
There were few power reactors when it opened in 1966, and fully two-
thirds of the fuel reprocessed until 1972 was military fuel. This fuel
was supplied by the Atomic Energy Commission under an agreement that
effectively subsidized the plant. This plant operated intermittently
from 1966 to 1972, when it shut down for modifications to increase its
capacity and efficiency. The plan at the time was that the facility
would be restarted in 1975. The planned expansion called for increas-
ing the capacity to 750 tons of spent-fuel per year. Improvements
specified in the modifications included improvements in the
environmental-—protection features and for the installation of waste
facilities needed to meet new regulatory requirements. 3 However, the
then Atomic Energy Commission decided that the modifications were so
extensive that a new construction permit and operating license would
be required. From last reports, the estimated costs of the modifi-
cations had risen from $15 million to $600 million and Nuclear Fuel 21
Services had withdrawn its application to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission for permission to reopen the plant.? While West Valley operated, the plant processed a total of 600 tons of spent—fuel, 76 of which 244 tons were commercial LWR fuel. 2°
A second plant located at Morris, Illinois; was constructed by the
General Electric Company, Inc. The company was convinced that relatively small reprocessing plants might be built to serve a group of power reactors within a short shipping radius. As a result, the
Midwest Fuel Recovery Plant was designed and built with a capacity of
300 tons per year. The Morris plant included major departures from the typical Purex-TBP process, with the aim of minimizing the contribution of reprocessing costs to the cost of nuclear power. In the course of testing the plant equipment prior to startup, it was concluded that the problems of handling fine radioactive solids were far greater than anticipated. 3 These problems would preclude the successful operation of the plant, and as a result, General Electric decided to postpone the operation plans pending completion of further studies.39
In 1968, the Allied Chemical Corporation announced plans to build a 1500-ton-per-year fuel reprocessing plant in Barnwell, South Carolina.
Construction of the plant was begun in 1971, and the originally planned facilities are complete.? The design and construction at Barnwell of
"tail end" facilities for the solidification of the waste for shipment to a federal repository and for the conversion of plutonium nitrate to solid plutonium oxide await decisions by the NRC and ERDA on the specifications and destinations of those materials. So far, Allied
General has invested over $250 million in the plant with the additional 22 waste and plutonium handling facilities expected to cost another $250 million.3 At present, Allied General's request for an operating. license is in jeopardy. The President's Policy statement of April 20,
1977 specifically denied government subsidy to support the Barnwell facility. The President also recommended the indefinite post- ponement of commercial reprocessing in the United States.?
A fourth plant, to be built by Exxon Nuclear, is planned to have a nominal reprocessing capacity of 1500-tons-per-year. The proposed construction site has been announced as part of the ERDA acreage at
Oak Ridge, Tennessee.? The company is awaiting final approval of site acquisition and the NRC's satisfaction of company complience with siting and licensing regulations.
Although the past history reflects a great deal of uncertainty | with regard to spent-fuel reprocessing; analysts, although pessimistic, are convinced that reprocessing will eventually be available. A detailed study by Macek?> concluded that the earliest date reprocessing would be available would be 1979. This noted the start-up of the
Barnwell Plant in 1979, followed by Nuclear Fuel Services in 1981, and
Exxon in 1985. A fourth plant of 1500 tonnes per year capacity is projected to begin operation in 1987.
Macek determines that under his scenario of uranium pricing and developing reprocessing capacity, if reprocessing is not initiated prior to mid-1982, the back end of the fuel cycle will forever be a financial liability. 23
D. Examination of the Role of Nuclear Energy
In Meeting America's Energy Needs
Historically, the electric power generating industry has grown at
a rapid rate. In the past few decades, the electric power demand has
grown at an average annual rate of about 7%, resulting in a doubling of load every 10 years.!7 This growth has been related to two basic
trends--a growth in population of approximately 1.3% per year and an
increasing per capita use. Statistics for the United States electric
power industry are given in Table 2.1. As can be observed, in the 27
year span from 1947 to 1974, per capita consumption of electricity has
increased over four and one-half times.
Through its convenience and utility, electricity has become vital
to the function and growth of modern civilization. Although the rates
of growth in the consumption of energy and of electricity have
decreased in the past few years and are expected to be substantially
lower in the future than in the past, the gradual increase in the
fraction of energy devoted to production of electricity seems destined
to continue.!7
Forecasts of the demand for electricity in the future contain
Many uncertainties. As a result, the projections of different indi-
viduals or groups vary widely. Studies surveyed by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commision prior to August 1976!’ indicate that this differ-
ence increases to over 600 Gigawatt (electric) by the year 2000
between the lowest and highest estimates. 24
uotjdunsuoy uotjdunsuoy
eqtdey) eqtdey)
UM UM
0088 0088
009Z 009Z
OOTY OOTY
OOCE OOCE
0072 0072
0O8T 0O8T
OOSS OOSS tog tog
zy zy
(UMY (UMY
uotjdunsuo) uotjdunsuo) VLOT-LY6T VLOT-LY6T
Tei Tei
UOTTLE13) UOTTLE13)
99° 99°
€e°O €e°O
9¢°0 9¢°0
L8°T L8°T
90°T 90°T
¢L°0 ¢L°0
SS°0 SS°0
0L 0L
T T SYFASTIEIS SYFASTIEIS
eqtdeyg eqtdeyg
S22 S22
€6°0 €6°0
eEMOTTY eEMOTTY
70°C 70°C
69°0 69°0
L9°T L9°T co co
c?7°0 c?7°0
9€°0O 9€°0O
AOMOg AOMOg
aed aed SFAIIOTA SFAIIOTA
(My (My
BUT} BUT}
Aj Aj
UOT UOT
fFoedey fFoedey
O°STT O°STT
O° O°
O° O°
0° 0°
0°89T 0°89T
€°2S €°2S
6°89 6°89
e19Ua4) e19Ua4)
9EC 9EC
TVE TVE
7L¥ Cl? Cl? 7L¥
"SN "SN
TT TT
FW) FW) “T°? “T°?
uot uot
(SUuOTTTTwW) (SUuOTTTTwW)
STIPL STIPL
oSt oSt
YYT YYT
G0Z¢ G0Z¢
T8T T8T
99T 99T
76T 76T
ze ze [Tndog [Tndog
OL6T OL6T
096T 096T
OS6T OS6T
7L6T 7L6T
Alea Alea
SS6T SS6T
S96T S96T LY6T LY6T
25
In 1975, about 9 per cent of the electricity consumed in the U.S. came from nuclear plants.!? As of January 1977, 59 commercial nuclear power plants with a total generating capacity of 41,887 MWe had been completed and licensed to operate. In addition, 131 plants were under construction or on order. By the end of 1987, the installed nuclear capacity would be 182,418 MWe based upon a ten year lead time necessary to construct and begin operation of a nuclear power facility. S Current projections by the nrc, !? ERDA, and the Edison Electric Institute?!
(EEI) conclude that a low growth projection without breeder reactors appears to be the most likely nuclear capacity growth applicable through the year 2000. The NRC and ERDA forecast specifically projects an installed nuclear capacity of 156,000 MWe in 1985 and 507,000 MWE in the year 2000. The projection by the Edison Electric Institute for the low growth scenario is a few per cent lower. As a result of examining reactor demands and the aforementioned nuclear capacity projections, a compromised nuclear growth projection thru 1997 is presented in Table 2.2 according to the reactor mix, Nuclear generating capacity through 1987 is based upon those plants scheduled for start-up by the end of 1987, given a ten-year lead time as a firm commitment.
The projection beyond 1987 reflects the ERDA, NRC, and EEI low growth projections. This projection shall serve as a basis for this study.
While reports have varied and have been argumentative as to the extent nuclear will contribute to the total electric generating capacity in the future, nuclear energy is still expected to account for more than half of the total electrical generating capacity by the year
2000.13 26
Table 2.2. Installed Nuclear Capacity 35 17» 31
Total Capacity BWR Capacity PWR Capacity Year (GWe) (GWe) (GWe)
1976 41.887 16.033 25.854 1977 50.364 17.921 32.443 1978 55.292 17.921 37.371 1979 63.480 20.629 42.851 1980 74.641 24.950 49.691 1981 92.151 29.295 62.856 1982 107.552 33.240 74.312 1983 125.875 41.344 84.531 1984 145.659 47.060 98.599 1985 161.928 52.948 108.980 1986 176.736 56.453 120.283
1987 182.394 58.781 123.613 1988 195.000 62.983 132.017 1989 204.000 65.983 138.017 1990 213.000 68.983 144.017 1991 225.000 72.983 152.017 1992 246.000 79.983 166.017 1993 274.500 89.483 185.017 1994 313.500 102.483 211.017 1995 345.000 112.983 232.017 1996 381.000 124.983 256.017 1997 409.500 134.483 275.017
3. DERIVATIONOF THE SPENT~FUEL WITHDRAWAL MODEL
A. Characteristics of the Spent-Fuel-Withdrawal Problem
In the background information on the current status of the post-
reactor fuel cycle, it was pointed out that as nuclear power continues
to grow and contributes a larger share to America's energy needs, the
questions with regard to the disposition of irradiated fuel must be
answered. Spent-fuel discharged from the operating reactors will
continue to accumulate at on-site storage facilities. This problem
persists until reprocessing is once again an integral part of the fuel
cycle or until the government makes a decision to manage permanent
waste disposal.
Macek2° demonstrates that spent-fuel should be stored on-site
at the reactor as opposed to off-site at the reprocessing plant or at
a repository. Assuming future reprocessing start-up, the utility will
be faced with the decision of how to relieve large stores of spent-fuel
in the face of a continual spent-fuel supply.
The spent-fuel-withdrawal problem is a planning problem which can
be expanded into a decision model spanning a number of time periods.
Before the model can be constructed, decisions applicable to each
modeling approach must first be made. In particular, the length of
the planning horizon, the maximization or minimization of the objective
function, and the specific assumptions necessary for implementation
are required.
Irradiated fuel contains significant quantities of fissile
' Material; often as much as 504 of the amount originally loaded into the
27 28 reactor.29 Given the relative scarcity of the fissile isotope uranium-
235, in the absence of the breeder reactor program the recycleable uranium in the spent-fuel may constitute a valuable energy resource.
Also, as the need for additional energy sources appear,. the fissile plutonium found in spent~fuel also represents a valuable energy resource.
Activities relating to the management of spent-fuel in the back end of the fuel cycle are primarily controlled by economics. Thus, with the question of whether or not to proceed with reprocessing still unanswered, it is important that the economic gain realized with recycle be firmly understood and established. The greater the economic gain with recycle, the greater the incentive to reprocess. Therefore, for the above reasons, the logical approach is to choose the maxi- mization of the economic gain realized with the recycle of uranium and/or plutonium from the spent-fuel to be the objective.
For modeling purposes, a planning horizon of finite length will be chosen. The time period should be of sufficient length to include important occurances such as the resumption of reprocessing and/or any new developments in reactor technology. Also, since the majority of the commercial nuclear plants in operation and in particular the plants that will serve as reference in the model development, operate on an annual cycle, the planning horizon will be divided into periods of one- year duration. Consequentially, the horizon shall be taken as a twenty- year period extending from 1977 to 1997.
Particular assumptions are necessary for the satisfactory deriva- tion and application of a model. First, it is assumed that a reactor's 29
on-site storage capabilityis not constrained as to the number of
assemblies it can store. This assumes that reactor operators will
expand storage facilities as necessary. Second, upon the resumption
of reprocessing, it is assumed that a market exists to warrant recovery
of the uranium and plutonium from the spent-fuel. This is necessary
so that the potential economic gain can be analyzed. The situation
where no marketability for plutonium exists is being examined later.
Also to be assumed is that demand for reprocessing services in any
given year does not exceed reprocessing capacity.
B. The Dynamic Programming Formulation
The objective in formulating the spent~fuel~inventory-withdrawal
model is to provide a framework within which alternative inventory
depletion strategies can be evaluated and compared. Since the com-
position of spent~fuel changes with time (due to decay of fissile Pu-
241), and since the inventory level of spent-fuel also changes with
time, time dependence is a key attribute of the problem. Therefore,
Dynamic programming”? is an appropriate vehicle for modeling the
problem.
It is first necessary to distinguish the periods in the planning
horizon. This is necessary since the ability to make a decision rests with the developments occuring during a particular time period. For
this purpose, the index set T is defined:
T= {0, 1, 2,...,t,..., tel, (3.1) 30
where t denotes the particular time period and t¢ represents the number
of years in the planning horizon. For purposes of this study, the
number of years in the planning horizon is twenty years.
In order to distinguish and denote the particular characteristics
of each assembly, it is necessary to define an index that can singularly
distinguish each assembly from others as a result of different initial
enrichments, burnups, and other characteristics. Each classification
considers only those assemblies assigned to that class in any one time
period as a function of those discharged. For this purpose, the classi-
fication considers only those assemblies assigned to that class in any
one time period as a function of those discharged. For this purpose,
the classification is defined by the index set J as:
J={1, 2, ...,4, ... =, N(t)}, (3.2) where j denotes the particular classification and N(t) denotes the
number of spent-fuel classes generated in period t.
To be able to distinguish each assembly, it becomes necessary not only to identify by classification, but to also identify by the
particular age of the assembly. The age of an assembly is chosen to
represent the number of time periods in years that a spent-fuel assembly has resided outside of the reactor core in storage. The index set
K= {0, 1, 2, ...,k,..., th, (3.3)
is defined to represent the ages of the stored spent-fuel, where k
denotes the number of time periods residing in storage. Using the
defined index sets, it is now possible to describe the spent-fuel 31 stockpiles.
The quantity of fuel discharged in any one year, is distinguished as the number of fuel assemblies discharged in a particular year t.
In general, the quantity discharged less those withdrawn represents the number of assemblies available for withdrawal. Specifically, this spent-fuel stockpile is represented by:
S54, (t) = the number of spent-fuel assemblies of class j and age k
available for withdrawal at the start of year t.
When k = 0, the number of assemblies available is the number discharged in the given time period t.
Also important as a measure of the spent~fuel stockpile is the inventory level. This quantity is denoted by:
T54,(t) = the number of spent-fuel assemblies of class j and age k
remaining in inventory at the end of year t.
The demand for spent-fuel depends upon the reprocessing capability available as a function of time. This rate is determined from the anticipated growth of the reprocessing capability in any particular time period t. This demand is represented by:
D(t) = the number of spent-fuel assemblies demanded to satisfy
reprocessing capability in year t.
The assemblies furnished from the on-site storage pools to meet the demand for reprocessing denote the decision variables. The assemblies chosen to meet demand vary, since demand is not constant 32
over the horizon or planning period. The decision variables are defined
by:
X54, (t) = the number of spent-fuel assemblies of class j and age k
withdrawn from inventory for reprocessing in year t.
Implicit in these definitions are the assumptions that, at the end of each year, inventory charges are assessed on the material remaining
in inventory and that stockpiled spent-fuel left in inventory increases
in age at the start of each year. Therefore, it is necessary to define
the transition relationships indicating the inventory level from stage
(time period) to stage.
The transitions coupling the stages are: I a ct
o>~ ww = Si, (t) - X4,,(t) ¥oj,k, t (3.4) xy C4.
$4. (t) = Ting (t - 1) ¥oj,k,t (3.5) where ¥ is the nomenclature denoting "for the entire range of".
Implicit in the derivation and definition of the spent-fuel stock- pile quantities is the constraint:
0 < Xj1,(t) < S(t)» ¥ogj,k,t (3.6)
which expresses the fact that the number of assemblies chosen to meet demand is greater than or equal to zero but less than or equal to the available supply in inventory.
Since spent-fuel has a "cooling-off" period in order to allow the highly radioactive fission products to decay to a tolerable activity 33
level, the demand cannot be met from assemblies that have not resided
in storage for at least one time period. This constraint, denoted by:
reflects a minimum on-site storage of at least one time period. There-
fore, the assumption of at least one-year in storage is carried through-
out the entire model derivation and application.
By defining a unit holding cost and unit profit per assembly the
objective function is formulated. The objective is to maximize the
present value of the profits from spent-fuel reprocessing over a
planning horizon of te years. Profits are assumed to represent the
excess expenditures obtained by recycling residual fuel over the costs
of spent-fuel storage and reprocessing. This objective is expressed
as:
te ct Nt) Maximize ) } } aM PfP5q(t)Xyx(t)- Wyk (t)1jK(t)} (3.8) t=0 k=0 j=1
where:
a = (1 + interest rate) = the discount factor,
Hy, (t) = the unit holding cost for a spent-fuel assembly of class
j and age k in year t,
P34 (t) = the unit profit resulting from reprocessing a spent- fuel
assembly of class j and age k in year t, and 34
> . X = {X44,(0) X41), ee 8 4 X51 (t,_)} ¥oj,k
is the optimal solution vector which determines the
optimal withdrawal policy.
The time-dependent material decay costs are reflected in the profit
parameters. The objective equation does not include a term to represent
the value of the spent-fuel inventory remaining at the end of the
horizon. This is because numerous assumptions about the nature of the
spent-fuel-disposition problem at the end of the planning horizon are
plausible. For a specific problem application, the selection of this
boundary assumption is reflected in the values assigned to the para- meters Hy), (tg) and Pi, (tg).
Equations (3.4), (3.5), (3.6), and (3.8) define a dynamic program
that is decomposed first in terms of time and further in terms of spent-
fuel classes. For purposes of continuity, the spent-fuel-inventory- withdrawal model for the determination of an optimal withdrawal policy
is summarized as follows:
tr t N(t) Maximize bo oo ihn oT F{P 31 (t)X 5, (t) - Hay (t) Ts (t)} (3.8)
over the vector
X= {Kj (0), Xy(1), - 2 es Kylt), «+ +s Xex(te)} ¥ Gk subject to
Tjx(t) = S54 (t) - Xjx(t) ¥Voeogj, k, t (3.9) 35
$5 (t) = S44-1 (t-1) - X44-1 (t-1) ¥ oj, k>0O, t>0 (3.10)
O < Xjk(t) < SzK(t) ¥oej,k,t (3.11)
Xjo(t) = 0 ¥oj,t (3.12)
N(t) ; Xi, (t) < D(t). ¥ok,t (3.13) j=l
C. The Hitchcock Problem Formulation
The spent-fuel-inventory-withdrawal model presented in the previous
section may be solved both by static and dynamic optimization techniques.
In general, the choice among the techniques depends upon the character-
istics. of the model in question.
As defined, the dynamic programming formulation results in a very
large problem. For the general problem defined by equation (3.8), the
model has t¢(t¢ + 1)/2 stages.28 For a reduced problem that considers
only one spent-fuel class, the model still has t¢ stages. For either
problem, the number of state variable transformations is te(t +1)/2.
Therefore, it is unlikely that the dynamic program can be solved.
Fortunately, the dynamic-programming formulation structures the relation-
ships in the problem.
Upon examination of the dynamic-programming formulation, several
special features of the model can be observed. First, it should be
pointed out that the state-transition relationships (equations 3.9-3.11)
‘and the objective function (equation 3.8) are linear in terms of the
state variable, S3K(t), and also the decision variable, X5i(t). Note 36
also that the constraint on the decision variable (equation 3.13) is linear. Another useful property is that the state variables at any stage are dependent only upon the initial states (Ss o(t), Tio (t), ¥j, t), and past decision variables. Finally, it can be seen that the solution would depend solely upon the initial states at each stage.
Since the model displays this special linearity of the objective function, constraints, and state transitions, the problem is amenable to transformation to a linear program. The linear-programming approach offers an advantage of allowing the treatment of decision variables as continuous parameters. However, due to the features of the problem addressed, discrete solutions are more advantageous. Examination of the structure of the model and the fact that linearity exists, indicates the dynamic-programming formulation can be transformed into a Hitchcock problem. /8
The Hitchcock problem was originally designed to address a class of transportation or minimum-cost-flow problems. Although the present formulation is a maximization problem as opposed to a minimum-cost-flow problem, the structure indicates that the Hitchcock problem is applic-— able; and the same method of analysis can be used.
In the context of the Hitchcock problem formulation, the material sources correspond to the initial inventory at the start of the plan- ning horizon and to the annual supply of spent-fuel of class j generated in year t. The demands correspond to the available reprocessing capacity in each year and to the final remaining inventory. The age of the spent-fuel, when it is selected for reprocessing, is represented 37 implicity by the relation between the year in which it is reprocessed and the discharge date. The cost coefficients for the Hitchcock model represent the profit from reprocessing less the cumulative holding costs. Thus the problem becomes profit-maximization rather than a cost-minimization problem.
In terms of the dynamic-programming-model parameters, the associ- ated Hitchcock spent-fuel-withdrawal problemis determined by equivalent supply, demand, and costs parameters.
The supply, denoted by a;, is composed of two components. The first transition relationship for the supply is defined by:
az = Siq(t=0), i=l, oe © « 95 N(t=0). ¥ j (3.14)
This relationship denotes the supply of spent-fuel assemblies from the various classifications comprised in the initial discharge. The relationship that transforms the remaining supply of freshly discharged fuel is given by:
aj = Sjo(t), isN(t=0) +1, ...A4 ¥oj,t (3.15)
where
tf A= ) N(t).
t=
This defines the remaining supply as that from each of the different classifications beyond the first discharge that occurred at t=0.
Demand, denoted by b,, is defined in terms of the total unallocated 38
spent-—fuel-reprocessing capacity available for class j spent-—fuel
assemblies in year t. By defining U, (t) as the unallocated spent-fuel-
reprocessing capacity available for class j assemblies in year t, the
Hitchcock demand is formulated by the following transformation:
i U;(n), n= 1, 2, + + - 5 te jel
ba = (3.16)
A te
) aj ~ ) Dn> n=tpti1 i=1 n=1
The term for n=t¢+l represents the number of spent-fuel assemblies residing in inventory at the end of the horizon. This is an artificial demand necessary to satisfy the constraint that the total available supply equals the total demand.
The measure of effectiveness for the Hitchcock problem is the cost coefficient denoted by C in* As mentioned earlier, this cost coefficient represents the profit from reprocessing less the cumulative holding costs from time of discharge and placement into inventory, until with- drawn to meet demand. This cost is represented as:
n-D Cin = Pi-cyn-pD(™ — by Hi-c,g (Dt2) iB (3.17)
where
n-1 |
aD ) N(X), 2=0 39
n B= ) N(2), and 2=0
D is the time period of inventory insertion.
Due to the constraint that an assembly discharged at time t+l
cannot be utilized to meet demand in year t, a computational constraint
is imposed on the cost coefficient. Using the technique known as the
"Big M'' method,?? an arbitrarily large number (M) is chosen for the cost
coefficient to reflect an infeasible solution. For the case of the maximum profit problem, a negative m is chosen to force the cost coefficient for a particular decision element to a value that would reflect an infeasible solution. This constraint is given by:
int | BB (3.18)
where
n B=) N(2). 2=0
by redefining the decision variable X54, (t) as:
Yin = the number of spent fuel assemblies from source i allocated
to demand period n, the corresponding objective function can be written as:
A t ¢tl Maximize » > Ci. Yan (3.19) i=l n=1 40
£ Subject to: ) Yan = ais i=l, ...,A
A Y Yan = bp i=1
A t +1 £ ) a; - ) b, = 0 i=1 n=1
Y > 0 ¥ odi,on
The maximization problem is converted to a minimization problem by
the standard approach of subtracting all cost coefficients, C;,, from
the maximum of the Cj, and replacing the original coefficients with —
these new corresponding computed values.2®8 Given the defined correspon-
dence between the spent-fuel classes, years of generation, and the
sources, along with that between the reprocessing capacities and the
demands, the interpretation is therefore straightforward. Thus, the problem has been converted into a Hitchcock problem that is far more readily analyzed computationally than the dynamic program.
D. The Linear Programming Formulations
The Hitchcock problem was originally designed to address a class of transportation problems or minimum-cost-flow problems. The formu- lation presented in Section C transforms the dynamic programming formulation into a minimum-cost-flow formulation. The purpose of this section is to develop an appropriate representation of the Hitchcock 41 model that is amenable to solution as a linear program.
The basis for this alternative representation results from the work of Bowman,® in which production scheduling was achieved using the transportation method of linear programming. This approach is partic~ ularly amenable to the Hitchcock model since the Hitchcock model is a formulation of the standard linear programming transportation problem.
Bowman proposed the use of the transportation model with the objective of assigning units of productive capacity in such a way that combined production plus storage costs are minimized and sales demands met, within the constraints of available capacity.’ An appropriate representation of the problem can be seen in Table 3.1 which denotes the activity matrix representation of the spent-fuel-withdrawal problem.
Before trying to understand the representation, it is first necessary to. redefine some parameters from the Hitchcock problem and to also define some new elements.
To begin with, note that for the linear programming formulation, the index set J, (equation 3.2) has been reduced to denote a single class of assemblies {N(t) = 1, ¥ t}, and therefore, it can be eliminated entirely for notational purposes. Also, the number of time periods defined by the index set T (equation 3.1) remain the same. The measure of effectiveness for this representation is the cost coefficient defined as C,_, where i = {0, 1, . Ls teh and n = {1, 2, ..., tet. The cost coefficient represents the profit from reprocessing less the cumulative holding costs in the feasible region. Otherwise the infeasible region has cost coefficients given by a negative "big M". 42
Aqtoedeg (AqTddngs) TeqO0L T -3 4, Oe Ce Cp Te e
te Tepom Tepom »
Ai0JUSAUT ZuruMersoig ZuruMersoig (1-72) (73) T4+"4q (FST (0) (1) (Z) (¢) ; S s St SI Sy °I °I 81 SS
YTS AesUuTYT AesUuTYT 34 4 730. J 4 4
(SuUOTIEUTISSed) ey} ey} J 4e4 +19 IE, 67-3 W- 4q
0°T AOZ AOZ 45 T T-?3 T-39
q-"4 AATTTQeATJorAg AATTTQeATJorAg ~34 44 34 Tr"Aq T3790 ose W- j On s < « Ty a SEQ Spotieg ttt te soe ree ttt eee
ose
cee Jo Jo pueusgd tte eee ee tee ttt eee
cee
eee sainseoW sainseoW £09 ETy (CE) 2. W- ee fq 209 Cly (ZC) K- ee @q
We ATug ATug TO9 W~ W- We Tq We
| “T° “T°
pueweg asrzeyostg¢ Sjuswertnbey (88940)
spoTiog eTqeL eTqeL {-F3 0 T z ¢ #4 Teq0L
43
The coefficient is represented by:
c= (3.20)
where
Pin = the unit profit resulting from reprocessing a spent-fuel
assembly in period n that was discharged in period i and,
Hig = the unit holding cost for a spent-fuel assembly in period
& that was discharged in period i.
The supply, denoted by ass and the demand, denoted by bo> are re- defined as: I ~
(3.21) Go N D(t=n), ¥et
Also necessary to complete this model is the definition of the slack inventory term 1, (i) as the number of spent-fuel assemblies dis- charged in period i that are left in inventory at the end of the horizon.
This added term applies the constraint on the model that:
a,= ) Y.+ 1, ¥i | (3.22) 44
where
Yin = the number of spent-fuel assemblies discharged in period i
allocated to meet demand in period n.
An additional constraint imposed is:
CE beat = ) Iga) (3.23) f i=0
and that for supply to equal demand, the condition:
tr t etl } aj - ) by = 0 (3.24) i=0 n=1
must be satisfied.
Summarizing the linear programming formulation by including the
objective function, the problem becomes:
Maximize — y ) C.in in (3.25) i=0 n=1
subject to:
tptl ) Yan tIg(i) = ay ¥ i n=1 45
Yin = dy
ee aj - b n=1 "
te 4, THE EXAMINATION AND EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS
OF THE SPENT-FUEL WITHDRAWAL PROBLEM
A. Characteristics of Nuclear Reactors in Regard to Nuclear Fuel
In order to demonstrate the utility of the models developed, it is necessary to first gain an understanding of the characteristics of nuclear fuel. This is a prerequisite for the implementation of the model, since the decisions rest upon the discharge characteristics of the spent-fuel.
At present, there are 59 commercial operating reactors within the
United States ranging in capacity from 48 to 1180 MWe. 3° Over the next decade, as vendors attempt system standardization, the largest plants on-line will have a capacity of up to 1300 MWe. For purposes of this study, the systems to be examined will be standardized designs of the four vendors currently producing nuclear steam supply systems within the United States.
The standardized system of the four vendors, Westinghouse (W),
Babcock and Wilcox (B & W), Combustion Engineering (CE), and General
Electric (GE) ; have nominal ratings of 1150, 1200, 1300, and 1200 MWe each, respectively. As a result of the variations in capacity plus individualized company designs, the nuclear fuel for each system has unique characteristics. This is true for initial and subsequent loadings of fresh fuel, along with the fuel discharged. Listed in
Table 4.1 are discharge and initial fueling data for the four light water reactor systems. The data given in this table will serve as the basis for parameters to’ be. established subsequently.
46 47
8109) 006°2Z uM QOOLT €0°? 78°O OOcT €8T oT BT Coe S88t c9oT c38°0 CEL (a9) . . . . ¥/T , .
e109 000 000472 umd 08 6°T 6°¢ €9°7 Z8°0 OOET TV? VLe4 7°¢ S3°0 LOLE (49) . . . ‘EE €/T
. , zi zi
“zzeved “zzeved 2109 (M 000‘€€ 000472 daMd OO0cT 89 16°C T6°¢ 6L£°S 669% T6"¢ S8°0 €8°0 S0Z [80% ® . . . . @)
€/T eszeyostq eszeyostq , .
2109 000‘°EE umd OSTTL Ocly 00072 te €9°7 €6T 9°¢ te Z8°0 7L94 ¢38°0 "9 (M) . .
. . . . pue pue €/T .
. Teng Teng
(Z (€
(IT YMI YMI sszeyoOSTq) esreyostTq) ATTenuuy S82eyostq) (QIW/GMW) (S€Z7-N (QIW/GMN) ATquessy
ATquiessy “T*y “T*y
(Sez—-n (S€z-N eTqIeL eTqIeL (SesreyoSTd %) peszeyostq JUswYyoTAaug YUuswyoTAuY %) JUueMYyoTAuY %) tag [ese] Tease] JUSMYyOTAug 20g SPpeOTey Aessy Aessy s8aeyosTq e8reyostq uoTzepTpessy uot eszeyostTq o8ieyosTq 3ST) seT{quiessy asieyostq 2109 eTpezszyl 810) [TelITuUl [eTITul TerIIuy peoTey e109 untaqrTinby ejewpxoaddy ezewrxoaddy /SeTTquessy (S€z-N (S€c-N (S€Z-N (¢ eSerzsay eserzsay eserzsay eserzsay eserzsay esersay e3erzsay Ter eseszsay jo Tenuuy on-Li) (A.W) ad TUL oMN ‘oN AL 4%) %) %)
48
During start-up and initial testing of the nuclear steam supply
system, variations in burnup are to be noted between the initial core
and the equilibrium core. These burnups, determined to be an average of
24,000 and 17,000 megawatt-days per metric tonne of uranium (MWD/MTU)
for the initial core of the PWR and BWR systems respectively, yield fuel
at discharge with a uranium assay of 0.85% U-235 and 0.864 U-235 respec-
tively. Similar interpretation can be established for the equilibrium-
core loading data. The difference in design and operating charac-
teristics for the BWR and PWR results in the difference in burnups
established for each system.
At best, nuclear power systems can extract only about 24 of the
energy theoretically available from uranium fuel. As a result of this
low energy yield with respect to what is theoretically available, | nuclear reactor fuel must be replaced periodically. Current generation reactors systems operate on a cycle in which a portion of the core is replaced annually. Each of the PWR systems discharge one-third of
their core annually, while the BWR system discharges one-fourth of its core annually. This difference between the PWR and BWR can once again be attributed to a difference in the basic design and operating characteristics of each system.
As a result of irradiation in the reactor, in which energy is produced by the fission process, a fraction of the uranium originally charged into the core is bred into plutonium and/or converted into fission products. At discharge, over 98% of the original uranium charged into the reactor remains.!? For the purpose of this study, the 49
negligible difference was ignored and the uranium discharged was
calculated based upon the initial charging.
Listed in Table 4.2 are discharge quantities of uranium and
plutonium found in spent-fuel. The calculations for plutonium quantities
are based on an average fissile plutonium discharge of 4.824 kg/MTU and
5.930 kg/MTU for the initial and replacement cores of a BWR; and 5.829
kg/MTU and 6.633 kg/MTU for the initial and replacement cores of a PWR.27
‘The isotopic composition of discharged plutonium varies with fuel
exposure and with repeated recycle of recovered plutonium in LWR's.!7
With successive recycles, the build up of Pu-236, Pu-238, Pu-240, and
Pu-242 increases and a greater amount of fissile plutonium, Pu-239 and
Pu-241, is required to compensate for parasitic capture. This is
illustrated by Deonigi!l? in which it is noted that during the next
decade, the nuclear industry will pass through a transition where most
of the fuel discharged will be at a low, variational exposure, to a
situation in the year 1985 where the discharged fuel will be pre- dominantly at equilibrium exposures. The results of testing fuel to
date show this assumption to be true.!7 Thus, it will be assumed for
this study that the average composition of plutonium in discharged fuel
is that given in Table 4.3. Also assumed is that the composition given
for plutonium in 1975 applies through 1979; that for 1980 applies through
1984; and that for 1985 applies through the remainder of the century.
Also included in Table 4.3 is the percent of the fissile plutonium in
the spent-fuel at discharge. 50
Table 4.2. Spent Fuel Discharge Characteristics
PWR PWR PWR BWR TEE w) | @Bew | (cE) (GE)
Initial Core
Discharge per Assembly (kg U) 412.0. 408.1 . 376.1. 1 66.2
Discharge per Assembly (kg fissile Pu) 2.4015 2.3788 2.1958 0.8017
Equilibrium Core
Discharge Per Assembly 412.0 408.1 376.1 166.2
(kg U) s e . } s
Discharge Per Assembly | 5 7328 | 2.7069 | 2.4987 | 0.9856 (kg fissile Pu)
51
Table 4.3. Average Composition of Plutonium Available for Recycle
Per Cent!’
YEAR | Pu-236 | Pu-238 | Pu-239 | Pu-240 | Pu-241 | Pu-242 | Fissile Pu
1975 | 0.006 1.0 64 . 22 10 3 74
1980 | 0.007 1.5 58 24 11 5 69 1985 | 0.007 1.7 54 25 12 7 66
52
Plutonium-241 is radioactive and undergoes a beta decay to
americium-241 with a half-life of 13.2 years. As a result, there is a
decrease of fissile plutonium content in the spent-fuel with time. This
effect tends to reduce the profitability of the spent-fuel from
reprocessing. The effect of this Pu-241 decay on the fissile plutonium
in the spent-fuel assembly is expressed by:
Pug(t) = Pug (0) {1 ~ r(l-e-At)} (4.1)
where
Pug(t) = quantity of fissile. plutonium (239 + 241) at time t,
Pug(0) = quantity of fissile plutonium (239 + 241) at discharge,
r = the ratio of Pu-241 at: time t=0 to the total fissile
Pu (239 + 241) at time t=0, and
X = the decay constant for Pu-241, A=.05251 year7l,
Equation 4.1 represents the correction for Pu-241 decay in stored spent-
fuel.
Having established the essential characteristics of spent-fuel, it is appropriate to determine the spent-fuel supply and the spent-fuel
demand. These prerequisites for implementation and solution of the model
are represented in the following section.
B. Spent-Fuel Supply and Demand Projections
It is necessary to first examine the supply of spent-fuel globally
in order to determine the reprocessing capacity based on reactor mix.
ERDA has published projections for quantities of spent-fuel generated 53
over the interval 1976-1985.** This projection is based on reactors on-line and those anticipated to be on-line through the end of 1985.
Based upon the projected growth of nuclear generating capacity presented in Table 4.4, a comparison is made to determine an average spent-fuel supply per GWe (1000 MWe). As a result of this comparison through the year 1985, the discharged quantities of spent-fuel in terms of tonnes of uranium and also the number of assemblies per gigawatt
(1000 megawatt) electric were determined. These quantities, given in
Table 4.5, represent the basis for the projected spent-fuel supply by reactor type to be established beyond 1985. By assuming an installed capacity of 1 BWR to 2 PWR's beyond 1987, nuclear growth capacity by reactor mix is established. This projection, coupled with the average discharge quantities of spent-fuel presented in Table 4.5, result in the global spent-fuel supply projections given in Table 4.6. In Table
4.6, tonnes of uranium as well as the number of assemblies of spent-fuel discharged per year are displayed. Calculations of the projected quantities in a given year are based on the installed capacity the previous year, indicating the one year lag in fuel loading and subsequent discharge. Having established the global quantities of spent-fuel discharged per year, it is necessary to establish the spent-fuel discharge per reactor. These quantities are established for the standardized systems examined in Table 4.1 and represent the annual supply available. As discussed earlier, these systems are the repre- sentative models of the reactors to be analyzed. Discharge quantities are 64, 68, 80, 183 assemblies per year for the Westinghouse, Babcock 54
Table 4.4. Installed Nuclear Capacity
Year Total Capacity BWR Capacity PWR Capacity (GWe) (GWe) (GWe)
1976 41.887 16.033 25.854 1977 50.364 17.921 32.443 1978 55.292 17.921 37.371 1979 63.480 20.629 42.851 1980 74.641 24.950 49.691 1981 92.151 29.295 62.856 1982 107.552 33.240 74.312 1983 125.875 41.344 84.531 1984 145.659 47.060 98.599 1985 161.928 52.948 108.980 1986 176.736 56.453 120.283
1987 182.394 58.781 123.613 1988 195.000 62.983 132.017 1989 204.000 65.483 138.017 1990 213.000 68.483 144.017 1991 225.000 72.483 152.017 1992 246.000 79.483 166.017 1993 274.500 89.483 185.017 1994 313.500 102.483 211.017 1995 345.000 112.983 232.017 1996 381.000 124.983 256.017 1997 409.500 134.483 275.017
55
Table 4.5. Discharge Quantities of Spent Fuel
Per Gigawatt (electric)
Reactor Type PWR BWR
Average Discharge (MTU/GWe) 29.002 | 35.329
Average Discharge (Assemblies/GWe) 67 192
56
SeT[quessy SeT[quessy
aATReTNUNY aATReTNUNY
9C8T0V 9C8T0V
9L909€ 9L909€ SEVECE SEVECE
€7968 €7968
99SEET 99SEET 970092 89€602 89€602
OC9EVT OC9EVT
TELeL TELeL CELEBS CELEBS
PLY98T PLY98T
8SSv79OT 8SSv79OT
cSOVCT cSOVCT
98928 98928
V9OCLY V9OCLY
CLBLE CLBLE
6ScOE 6ScOE
COLES COLES TTO8T TTO8T
€Sccl €Sccl 7198 7198
yOTSOT yOTSOT
jo jo
°on °on XT XT
AoR08ey AoR08ey
Sot[Tquessy Sot[Tquessy
L£SEst L£SEst
€69T2 €69T2 T8TLT T8TLT
TL89 TL89
7C6E 7C6E CSTE CSTE
LO6E72 LO6E72
LL96T LL96T
€TOvT €TOvT
CvVcet CvVcet
699¢T 699¢T £6021 £6021
6€80T 6€80T 98cIT
99TOT 99TOT €L78 €L78
S9SS S9SS
€LL4e €LL4e LYUL? LYUL?
LE%8 LE%8
CVY CVY
Aq Aq
- -
pesazeyostq pesazeyostq
Jo Jo
suoTz.eforzg suoTz.eforzg
UME UME *oNn *oNn
Junouwy Junouwy ¢° ¢°
C°CLL C°CLL
9° 9°
9° 9°
6° 6° 9° 9°
9°SLGC 9°SLGC 7° 7°
9° 9°
o°766T o°766T
O°8EsT O°8EsT
9° 9°
T° T°
7°8€9 7°8€9 6° 6°
L°CCte L°CCte
7° 7°
G°898T G°898T S°EVcT S°EVcT 6° 7°?T8. 7°?T8.
OIn OIn
€9S €9S
OT7¥ OT7¥ 9T9E 9T9E
L£STE L£STE
AtTddng AtTddng
CC8C CC8C
VEZ VEZ 8cEC 8cEC
798 798
LSS LSS
L86E L86E
7L02 7L02
70ST 70ST ~ ~
Teng Teng
SoeTTquessy SoeTTquessy
quedg quedg
SETVT SETVT 96€CT 96€CT
€762 €762
ecrit ecrit
O6TE O6TE
cee cee
ESTLT ESTLT
S8Tot S8Tot
6796 6796
C88 C88
6508 6508
cOEL cOEL 8TS9 8TS9
86S% 86S%
LE8E LE8E
8092 8092 GLO0e GLO0e
GYSST GYSST
S788 S788 L776
GcLS GcLS
- -
Jo Jo
‘g°y ‘g°y
wWMd wWMd
°oN °oN aTqey aTqey
L£°8StT L£°8StT
c°96L9 c°96L9
€° €° 0°€OL9
¢° ¢°
8° 8°
O° O° O°SLVE O°SLVE
1°898 1°898 9° 9°
7° 7°
9° 9°
€° €°
c°ILSE c°ILSE
9° 9° €° €°
8° 8° 6°CLUC 7° 7° 6°S9CT 6°S9CT
L£°OT?T L£°OT?T
OLW OLW
96EL 96EL 9609 9609
O9TY O9TY
6SS 6SS
T6E% T6E%
SECS SECS
8YTE 8YTE 8E8~C 8E8~C 9L6T 9L6T
VTE VTE
L86€ L86€
7ZE9T 7ZE9T - -
966T 966T
£66T £66T
9L6T 9L6T
1eaz 1eaz
066T 066T
C86T C86T
O86T O86T T86T SL6T SL6T
Y66T Y66T
CO6T CO6T T66T T66T
S86l S86l 686T
986T 986T E86. E86. 786T
6L6T 6L6T
L66T L66T S66T S66T
L86T L86T
S86T S86T LLOT LLOT
57
and Wilcox, Combustion Engineering, and General Electric systems, res-
pectively.!4
With the spent-fuel supply projections established, it is nec-
essary to determine the reprocessing capability. For the purpose of
this study, the amount of reprocessing available per reactor in any
year is based upon:
“1. the reprocessing capability in the given year,
2. the amount of spent-fuel generated in a given year, and
3. the reactor mix in which the reprocessing capability is
distributed.
As a result of the first and second statements above, the re-
processing capability in any given year are distributed to process
only the additional new fuel added to the supply each year. This es-
tablishes a reprocessing demand distribution in which per-reactor re-
processing demands can be established. From the third statement
above, the assumed reactor mix is 2 PWR’s to 1 BWR. This in effect
allots reprocessing capacity by two-thirds of the total to PWR's, and one-third of the total to BWR's. This is necessary since both
systems are to be examined on a unit-reactor basis.
Before proceeding further, the next question to be answered re-
lates to the availability of reprocessing capacity during the time
frame examined. As a result of a study by Macek,!7 three scenarios reflecting reprocessing plant start-up are established. They are: 58
1. Optimistic, with. start-up mid-1979,
2. Realistic, with start-up 1981, and
3. Pessimistic, with start-up 1983.
For purposes of plant start-up, it is assumed that the plants op-
erate at one-third and two-thirds capacity in their first and second
years of operation, respectively; and at their rated capacities
thereafter.!? This is in accord with recent government and indepen-
dent studies of reprocessing capability.’ 0 The earliest start-up
date (optimistic scenario) projects start-up of Allied General Nuclear
Services (AGNS) plant at Barnwell in 1978, Nuclear Fuel Services (NFS)
in 1983, Exxon in 1985, and a fourth plant in 1987. The rated capac- “ities of the plants are 1500, 750, 2000, and 2000 metric ton heavy
metal per year (MTHM/yr) respectively. Listed in Table 4.7 is the
reprocessing plant capacity schedule. Assuming the sequence of
reprocessing capacity additions over time remains the same for all
scenarios, the different scenarios to be examined differ only by
the start-up date of the reprocessing activity. Under this assump-
tion, the three reprocessing scenarios to be examined are presented in
Tables 4.8 through 4.10 based upon reactor mix. These projections are
compared to a recent independent study +? and prove to be conservative
by an average difference of 7 per cent.
To establish the reprocessing demand rate, in number of assemblies
per year, for a particular system, the discharge characteristics of
spent~fuel from Table 4.2 are utilized. Using average heavy metal
discharge quantities for each of the systems, the unit reactor 59
Table 4.7. Reprocessing Plant Capacity Schedule
Capacity -— MTHM
Year AGNS NFS Exxon 4th Plant
1977 - ~ = -
1978 - - - -
1979 500 = - -
1980 1000 - ~ -
1981 1500 - ~ - 1982 | 1500 - ~ -
1983 1500 250 ~ -
1984 1500 500 - -
1985 1500 750 750 -
1986 1500 750 1400 -
1987 1500 750 2000 750
1988 1500 750 2000 1400
1989 1500 750 2000 2000
1990 1500 750 2000 2000
1991 1500 750 2000 2000
1997 1500 750 2000 2000
60
Table 4.8. Reprocessing Capability - Optimistic Scenario
(MTU)
Year Total BWR PWR Year Total BWR PWR
1977 0 0 0 1988 5650 1883 3767 1978 0 0 0 1989 6250 2083 4167 1979 500 167 333 1990 6250 2083 4167 1980 1000 333. 667 1991 6250 2083 4167 1981 1500 500 1000 1992 6250 2083 4167 1982 1500 500 1000 1993 6250 2083 4167 1983 1750 583 1167 1994 6250 2083 4167 1984 2000 667 1333 1995 6250 2083 4167 1985 3000 1000 2000 1996 6250 2083 4167 1986 3650 1217 2433 1997 6250 2083 4167 1987 5000 1667 3333
61
Table 4.9. Reprocessing Capability - Realistic Scenario
(MTU)
Year Total BWR PWR Year Total BWR PWR
1977 0 0 0 1988 3650 1217 § 2433
1978 0 O- 0 1989 5000 1667 3333 1979 0 0 0 1990 5650 1883 3767 1980 0 0 0 1991 6250 2083 4167
1981 500 167 333 1992 6250 2083 4167
1982 1000 333 667 1993 6250 2083 4167
1983 1500 500 1000 1994 6250 2083 4167
1984 1500 500 1000 1995 6250 2083 4167
1985 1750 583 1167 1996 6250 2083 4167
1986 2000 667 1333 1997 6250 2083 4167 1987 3060 1000 2000
62
Table 4.10. Reprocessing Capability - Pesimistic Scenario
(MTU)
Year Total BWR PWR Year Total BWR PWR
1977 0 0 0 1988 2000 667 1333
1978 0 0 0 1989 3000 1000 2000
1979 0 0 0 1990 3650 1217 2433
1980 0 0 0 1991 5000 1667 3333
| 1981 0 0 0 1992 5650 1883 3767
1982 0 0 0 1993 6250 2083 — 4167
1983 500 167 333 1994 6250 2083 4167
1984 1000 333 667 1995 6250 2083 4167
1985 1500 500 1000 1996 6250 2083 4167
1986 1500 500 1000: 1997 6250 2083 1987 1750 583 1167
63
discharge demands are established. These demands, in terms of number of assemblies demanded per year, are represented in Figures
4.1 through 4.4 for each of the systems under examination. By plotting the annual discharge, as long as the demand curves remain below this rate, there is always a backlog of spent-fuel. When the yearly rate of demand exceeds the annual discharge, the backlog begins to reduce, with the possibility of consuming the entire backlog until the supply equals demand. For purposes of sensitivity analyses, the projected demand rates for each of the scenarios ex- amined are varied by +152 and +30% from the base projections. These demand profiles are also included in the figures. |
The remaining elements of the spent-fuel withdrawal model to be determined are the cost coefficients. Their derivation is discussed in the next section.
C. The Measure of Effectiveness - Profitability per Assembly
1. Independent Value Components
The choice of an optimal withdrawal policy for spent nuclear fuel rests primarily with the economics of the spent-fuel. Spent-fuel may be considered as a "mineral" which can be "mined" (reprocessed) to recover the unused nuclear fuel.2° A measure of the net value of unreprocessed fuel is given by equation 4.217 where
Net Value = U Value+ Pu Value - Fuel Storage Costs
~ Reprocessing Costs - Waste Disposal Costs (4.2) 64
G6 G6
OFISTTESY
UMd UMd
OTASsTWTsseg OTASsTWTsseg £6 £6
| esnoysutisem esnoysutisem
YST+ 40E+
T6 T6
- -
ajiey ajiey
pueweq pueweq ATquessy ATquessy
aseg hOE+ %ST+})
Teng Teng
oTastut3do oTastut3do
queds queds
“T'y “T'y van3ty van3ty OST T
r OOT Sct
10}.eayY Jeg pepueweq SeT[Tquessy jo rzequny 65
f
OFISTTPOY
YUMd YUMd DTASTUTSSag DTASTUTSSag
¢ XOOTTM XOOTTM
LOE+ yc
ty
pue pue yoooqeg yoooqeg
- -
ajey ajey
pueuegd pueuegd
ATquessy ATquessy aseg aseg 4“4ST+
> esieyostq esieyostq
OTasturadg
Teng Teng
quedg quedg
Tenuuy Tenuuy
‘*z*y ‘*z*y ean3ty ean3ty
LL 7
T
~
OS
OOT
OST
JojJOeSY Jaq pepueweg seT[Tquessy jo Jequny 66
$$ G6 +}
YUMd OF ASTTESY
ButszssuTsuq + -——_ OFISTUTSSAd €6 + oseg—~\ —~ LOE+ —_+-—_+—_+ T6
uotysnquoy | oseg L0E+ y¢T+ 4
-—
9}zey
pueusog
ATqumessy asieyostq
Tong oTastutido
jusdsg Tenuuy
Vv
‘“E*y
esan3Ty LL Tos 7
~
0
OST OOT
1ojJDeeaY Jeg pepueUseg SeT[quessy jo Azoquny
67 L6 L6
}
+ G6 G6 + VTISTTeoyY Q9/YMG
4 £6 £6 OTA}0eTY DTISTWTSSog LOC+ YCT+ +
Terzsuey — Nz J 4 ZOE+ eseg “ST+ - ; ajzey puewsq ATquessy
Teng jueds
a | LL TOOT FOST TOO TSLE TOOE TOSZ toon 0 hc
zoj0eay Jog pepuewaq seT[Tquessy jo azsquny 68
Of the five components of the value of spent-fuel, only three components have been established with reasonable assurance and validity. Speci- fically, uranium value, plutonium value, and storage costs have been studied» 19 517 ana pricing methods established; whereas, due to the uncertainties surrounding the back end of the fuel cycle, repro- cessing and waste disposal costs are debateable and uncertain.
When considering the question of the reprocessing alternative, it is to be noted that certain costs must be met if a profit is to be | realized. This is particularly true of reprocessing and waste disposal costs. These two components of the value equation (4.1) are costs to be incurred if any measure of profitability is to be realized. There- fore, when considering the establishing of an economic measure of effectiveness, these costs do not have to be included in the profit- ability of spent-fuel for the analyses of this particular problem.
As a result, equation 4.2 is redefined to reflect the profitability per assembly in terms of the time and characteristic dependent costs.
Thus equation 4.2 becomes:
Profitability| _ [U Value Per] 4+ |Pu Value _ |Storage Costsir4 . 3) Per Assembly |. Assembly Per Assembly Per Assembly
When each of these parameters are taken into consideration, the salvage value of the spent~fuel is utilized as the measure of the effective economic gain. Thus, the basis for the cost coefficients of the models derived is that given above by equation 4.3.
2. Uranium Value of Spent-Fuel 69
The uranium recovered in the reprocessing facility can be recycled into the feed steam of the nuclear fuel cycle. Since the discharged fuel from the operating light water reactors under equilibrium conditions contains fissile uranium (U-235) that is higher in concen- tration than that of natural uranium, use of spent-fuel provides a savings in natural uranium feed and separative work.
The potential savings in natural uranium feed and separative work are proportional to the price of the enriched product from the enrich- ment plant. Enrichment expenses in a gaseous diffusion plant are proportional to separative work, whose cost reflects energy consumption needed to produce enriched uranium. Upon analysis of the gaseous diffusion cascade, ?4t this value of the enriched uranium product based upon the unit cost of separative work and the unit cost of natural uranium feed is given by:
D = C.{(2x.-1) gn __“P_ ~ (2x ~1)£n_7*w__+ Ss P 1-xp ~Ky
_*p7*w_Ey ((2x,-1) Qn Ix,“woe (2x_-1) an IKfy}
+ C, *p7*w (4.4) Kp Ky where
D = price of the enriched product, $/kg;
Cs= unit cost of separative work, $/kg;
70
Cy = unit cost of natural uranium feed, $/kg;
x. = assay of uranium-235 in the enriched product weight fraction;
X- = assay of uranium-235 in the feed stream, weight fraction; and
x = assay of uranium-235 in the diffusion plant tails, weight
fraction.
Also included in the original analysis of the diffusion plant cascade
for the enriched product is a unit cost assigned to the diffusion tails.
At present, no value is assigned to the tails and as a result, it is ©
not included in equation 4.4.
Utilizing the discharge assays of the spent nuclear fuel for the
PWR and BWR systems given in Table 4.1, the uranium-value equations
are established for the intial- and equilibrium-core discharges. The
uranium-value equations are determined on the basis of an enrichment
plant tails assay of 0.304 and the product enrichment being the spent-
fuel assay. By substituting this data into equation 4.4, the value of
recovered uranium for the initial core discharge is given by:
1. BWR
D= (0.12397)C_ + (1.36253)Ce- Co (4.5)
2. PWR
D = (0.11456)C_ + (1.33820)C, - C, (4.6)
are for the equilibrium core discharges, the value of recovered uranium
is given by: 71
1. BWR
D= (0.10529)C. + (1.31387)C, = Cc. (4.7)
2. PWR
D= (0.08719)C_ + (1.26521)C. - Cc. (4.8) where C, is added to represent the unit cost of conversion of uranium to UF¢ gas.
These value equations can be interpreted to indicate (using equation 4.5) that one unit of recovered uranium can serve to reduce the front end requirement for natural uranium by 1.36 units and for separative work by 0.124 units. Similar interpretation can be applied to equations 4.6-4.8. Formulas 4.5~-4.8 corrected for losses during reprocessing and fabrication are rewritten as:
D = {(0.12397)C, + (1.36253)C, - C,}{1 - ny- no} (4.9)
D = £(0.11456)¢, + (1.33820)C, - C,H1- n, - no} (4.10)
D= {(0.10529)C. + (1.31387)C, - CHI -1 7 No} (4.11)
D = {(0.08719)C_ + (1.26521)c, - C Hl - ny - no} (4.12) where
ny = loss during reprocessing!’ (=0.005)
7 = loss during fabrication!’ (#0 .003)
A reduction in uranium value is noted between the initial- and 72
equilibrium-core discharges due to higher burnups which result in a
greater utilization of the fissile U-235.
From the formulas derived, it is shown that the values of recovered
uranium from spent-fuel is related to the prices of uranium and sepa- rative work less the conversion costs. The price of uranium is in- fluenced by the uranium market, but eventually the price depends on
the balance: between supply and demand. Projections made by the Energy
Research and Development Administration? indicate that as the cumulative production of U,0g increases, the value of the uranium will also increase. This projection results approximately in an 18% increase in the price of U,0g as the cumulative production increases by one million short tons. Correlating this projection with a historical analysis of the uranium mining industry by Liebermann,? the price of uranium is projected to increase at an average rate of 5.5% per year. This average rate is determined based upon proven reserves cf less than $30 per pound forward cost. A study by Voltin and Draper!! estimated that the rate of uranium price increase is reduced as more reserves are proven and as international trade increases; the rate of 5.52% per year is effective only through the year 1985. Afterwards, as a result of the increased supply, the price is assumed to increase at a reduced rate of 3.9% per year./1 it is forecasted that the present U30g price of $41 per pound?" increases to $63.66 by 1985, and reaches $101.65 by
1997, The forecasts of future uranium prices are summarized in Table
4.11.
In the U.S. today, the only major supplier of enrichment is the
ERDA diffusion plant complex. The diffusion process is energy 73
Table 4.11. Uranium Price Projections
Price Price | Price Price Year Year $/1b U0 $/kg U302 $/1b U302 $/kg U308
1977 41.00 90.39 1988 71.56 157.77
1978 43.32 95.50 1989 74.41 164.04
1979 45.77 100.90 1990 77.37 120.57
1980 48.36 106.60 1991 80.44 177.35
1981 51.09 112.63 1992 83.64 184.40
1982 53.98 119.00 1993 86.97 191.74
1983 57.03 125.73 1994 90.43 197.36
1984 60.25 132.84 1995 94.03 207.29
1985 63.66 140.35 1996 97.77 215.54
1986 66.19 145.93 1997 101.65 224.11 1987 68.83 151.73
74 intensive; and as a result, a sharp increase from $26 per kg of sepa- ative work for fixed-commitment contracts is projected to escalate at
1.4% annually by Voltin and Draper in 1976.!! This is to allow for the increase costs due to the required energy input per SWU. The reason that the escalation is not greater after 1985, when energy costs are expected to rise sharply, is that it is assumed that new technology
(centrifuge, nozzle, and/or laser separation) will make a contribution to lowering costs. . However, upon comparison of this projected rate with recent ERDA projections,» the estimate is changed to an increase of
2.44 annually, to more accurately reflect recent trends. Separative work cost projections for the time frame of this study are summarized in Table 4.12. Also as a result of the work of Voltin and Draper, the conversion costs are forecast to increase by 2% per year from the 1977 price of $4.41 per kg.° Table 4.13 presents the forecast of uranium conversion (to UF ¢ gas) costs.
3. Plutonium Value
The value of the residual plutonium in the spent-fuel is deter- mined by the manner in which plutonium is used. In order to establish a value, it is necessary to distinguish between plutonium price and plutonium value.?° A "use value" is understood to be the sum of money paid in order to use a commodity. A "market price" depends upon the balance between supply and demand. When considering the current stand- still of reprocessing capability in the U.S., the establishment of a firm market price for plutonium is impractical.
However, for the purpose of this study, an artificial "market" is 75
Table 4.12. Separative Work Cost Projection
SWU Cost SWU Cost Year Year $/kg-SWU $/kg-SWU
1977 69.80 1988 90.84 1978 71.50 1989 93.10 1979 73.23 1990 95.36 1980 75.01 1991 97.67 1981 76.83 1992 100.65 1982 78.70 1993 102.48 1983 80.61 1994 104.97 1984 82.57 1995 107.52 1985 84.57 1996 110.13 1986 86.63 1997 112.80 1987 88.73
76
Table 4.13. Uranium Conversion Costs Forecast
Cost Cost Year Year $/kg-U $/kg-U
1977 | 4.41 1988 | 5.59 1978 | 4.50 1989 | 5.70 1979 | 4.59 1990 | 5.82 1980 | 4.68 1991 | 5.93 1981 | 4.77 1992 | 6.05 1982 | 4.87 1993 | 6.17 1983 | 4.97 1994 | 6.30 1984 | 5.06 1995 | 6.42 1985 | 5.17 1996 | 6.55. 1986 | 5.27 1997 | 6.68 1987 | 5.48
77 established for plutonium based upon the use value (limiting value for plutonium in the plutonium market). To define the use value, it is necessary to know the technical and economical circumstances of plutonium utilization.2? Obviously, the plutonium market, when esta- blished in this manner, is linked with uranium and enrichment services since if recycled, fissile plutonium can replace some U-235.
Plutonium generated in light water reactors can be used in several different modes. Among the utilizations established are: in-situ (the plutonium, when formed in the reactor, is consumed before recycle), for recycle in LWR's, for the High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor based upon plutonium fuel design, and for early fuelings of the fast breeders. 25 Only light water reactors are expected to contribute to the nuclear generating capacity through the end of this century. This is due to the establishment of firm technology and services.to support it.17 Thus, for the time frame of this study, it is assumed that only piutonium use in-situ and in recycle contributes to the establishment of a plutonium market.
Fissile plutonium is formed in the reactor core as a result of the radiative capture of neutrons in the U-238 nucleus. When formed, the fissile plutonium (Pu-239 and Pu-241) participates in a similar fashion to U-235 in the general fission reactions. The more fissile plutonium that is formed in the reactor, the more important it is in-situ con- sumption. The quantity of fissile plutonium available to participate in the fission process depends upon the degree of core burnup and the neutronic characteristics of the reactor. No value can be assigned to this plutonium since it is a general product of neutron capture in U-238 78 and since it is freely available to be utilized without reprocessing.
Plutonium remaining in the spent-fuel can be chemically separated
(reprocessed) from the uranium and fission products contained in the spent-fuel. It can be utilized as a fuel again by mixing it with natu~ ral, depleted, or enriched uranium to form a mixed-oxide fuel. Thus, the separated plutonium can be reintroduced into the same reactor.
As discussed in section A of this chapter, there will be a tran- sition from fuel discharged at low exposures, to a situation in 1983, where the fuel will be discharged predominantly at equilbrium exposures.
The effect of the recycled plutonium depends on this situation, since the operating characteristic of the recycle reactor will depend on the composition of the plutonium. Referring back to Table 4.3, the numbers presented are useful in determining the average value of plutonium in the time periods when it can be expected that the reprocessing plants will be operational. As mentioned earlier, for this study, this recycle mode is primarily for the purpose of creating an “artificial market" to establish a value for plutonium.
The value of plutonium can be established in several ways. The method most frequently used is the indifference or break-even method proposed by Eselbach.!© The indifference method defines plutonium values as the value yielding the same fuel cycle costs whether the plutonium discharged is sold or recycled. For this method, firm’ numerical values for each fuel cycle cost component for both enriched uranium fuel and plutonium recycle must be known, leaving only the value of plutonium unknown. Obviously this method depends heavily upon a mixed-oxide fuel cycle and the establishment of a well defined 79 plutonium market. Therefore, it seems that this method does not appear useful in the present situation of a non-existent firm plutonium market.
This results from the present uncertainties surrounding reprocessing and recycle.
A generalized equation for plutonium value is derived by Deonigi which establishes relationships with fully enriched uranium, Plutonium-
242 penalty factor, and the differential fabrication cost correction for mixed-oxide fuel above that of uranium fuel.!’ Deonigi shows that
the plutonium value is VPu) = U(ie1.6R) - Pu fabsication penateys S/kgwOK (4.13) where
A = plutonium replacement value (relative worth of Pu-239 to U-235
as a fissile material - gm U-235/em Pu — fissile),
U = the cost of fully enriched uranium (93% wt) at the fabrication
plant - $/kg, and
R = ratio of concentration of Pu-242 to the concentration of
fissile plutonium, (Pu-239 and Pu-241).
For purposes of this study, the value of plutonium is best estab- lished by considering the savings realized in the reduction of require- ments for uranium ore and separative work units that results from re- processing.
In the GESMO study, an estimate of savings in uranium ore and separative work realized by plutonium recycle is evaluated.!” This 80
evaluation establishes equivalent savings based on the present offer-
ings of major fuel suppliers. It is found that one gram of fissile
plutonium in a PWR is equivalent to 0.1906 kgs of separative work plus
0.180 kgs of natural uranium. A similar analysis for BWR recycle is
that 0.2037 kgs of separative work plus 0.1870 kgs of natural uranium
is equivalent to one gram of fissile plutonium. The amount of savings realizable is dependent on the price that must be paid for natural
uranium and separative work during the year that recycle occurs. Since
the actual value of the plutonium at a specific time is dependent upon
the quantity of fissile plutonium available at that time, a correction
is allowed for the decay of Pu-241. Accounting for losses during re-
processing and fabrication, the effective plutonium value is determined
by:
V(Pu) = (Cg * A+ Ce * BY) (1 - ny - ng - 13) (4.14) u rg
G plutonium value, $/gm - fissile; C_ = unit cost of separative work, $/kg; Ce = unit cost of natural uranium feed, $/kg; nL = loss during reprocessing!” (= 0.005); = loss during fabrication!’ ( 0.003); and = loss in fissile Pu during reprocessing and fabrication due to decay of Pu-2412° (= 0.01). The factors A (equivalent of one gram of fissile plutonium in terms of separative work units), and B (equivalent to one gram of fissile 81 plutonium in terms of natural uranium), which vary with the type of reactor, are summarized in Table 4.14. This equivalency approach serves as the method of determining the value of plutonium. The cor- rection for decay of: plutonium-241 with time is reflected in the com- puter code developed to determine the profit realizable from recycle of the plutonium and uranium. It is appropriate to note that equation 4.14 does not include a fabrication penalty for mixed-oxide fabrication. This penalty is a cost factor that is incurred if recycle and subse- quently an economic gain is to be realized. D. Storage Costs An examination of the storage costs is conducted by Macek.2° From the examination, it is established that the range of the costs of spent- fuel storage extends from $5500/MT-spent-fuel per year for a utility- owned storage facility, to $20,000/MI-spent-fuel per year for a commer- cial facility. Macek establishes a figure of $7000 per tonne of fuel per year as typical cost for facilities where utilities supply some form of long term commitment or front-end money. It is expected that the storage costs will increase at the annual rate of inflation. For the current decade, this rate will be at 8% per year, during the 1980's at 6%/yr, and during the 1990's at 4%/yr. Decrease in the rates for the 1980's and 1990's are attributed to a slowing in the rate of inflation Based upon the assumptions above, on-site storage costs per assembly- year for each of the reactor systems are summerized in Table 4.15. Each of the parameters discussed in this section are utilized in 82 developing a data generating code. The implementation of the code, plus the solution technique is discussed in the next chapter. 83 Table 4.14. ‘Plutonium Value for Uranium Feed and Separative Work Equivalents!7 Type of Reactor Equivalents to 1 gm of Pu (fissile) . PWR BWR SWU Equivalent - Kg 0.1906 | 0.180 Natural U Equivalent ~- Kg 0.2037 | 0.1870 84 Table 4.15. On-Site Storage Costs Per Assembly - Year $/Assembly PWR PWR PWR BWR Year (W) (B & W) (CE) (GE) 1977 3271 3240 2991 1319 1978 3543 3510 3240 1429 1979 3839 3802 3510 1548 1980 4158 4119 3803 1677 1981 4416 4374 4038 1781 1982 4689 4644 4288 1891 1983 4979 4931 4553 2008 1984 5286 5236 4834 2132 1985 | 5613 5560 5133 2264 1986 5961 5904 5451 2404 1987 6329 6269 5788 2553 1988 6721 6657 6146 2711 1989 7136 7069 6526 2878 1990 7577 7506 6929 3056 1991 7887. 7812 7212 3181 1992 8209 8131 7507 5311 1993 8544 8463 7813 3446 1994 8892 8808 8132 3587 1995 9255 9168 8464 3733 1996 ~—-9633 9542 8809 3886 1997 10026 9931 9169 4044 5. APPLICATIONOF THE SPENT-—FUEL-WITHDRAWAL MODEL A. Model and Data Summary The linear models for the spent-fuel-withdrawal problem developed in Sections C and D of Chapter 3 are analyzed from an optimization standpoint. These models are chosen to be applied to the optimization of the inventory withdrawal problem because standard methods exist for their solution. Before discussing these models, it is necessary first to discuss the dynamic programming formulation and the problems to -be encountered in its implementation. The dynamic program formulated in Section 3-B is, computationally a large problem. For the general problem, considering N(t) classes of spent-fuel for each time period t, the model has te(t,t1)/2 stages. Considering N(t)=1 for all t in order to reduce the dimensionality of the problem, the program has tr stages. For either problem the number of state variable transformations is tg(tgtl)/2.28 At each stage, the number of state variables exceeds or is equal to the number of decision variables. This adds additional computational difficulty, if not impossibility, in obtaining a dynamic programming solution of the model. As a result of these difficulties encountered with the dynamic program, the linear approach is determined to be the best. Upon considering the linear models developed in Chapter 3, a reduction in dimensionality is obtained for the Hitchcock formulation when considering only one spent-fuel class at each discharge period. Upon reduction in dimensionality, the Hitchcock problem formulation reduces to the Linear Programming Problem or Transportation model 85 86 developed in section 3-D. The model that is applied to the actual optimization of the inventory model is analyzed from the point of view of only one class of spent-fuel at a given discharge period. This one classification represents the average characteristics of the spent-fuel in the discharge. Having examined actual discharge data for the H. B. Robinson plant, ® it is found that each assembly can be uniquely classi- fied according to the burnup it has experienced. For this particular plant, this results in 53 different classifications at each discharge. Statistically, for each of the assemblies examined from any given dis- charge period, deviation from mean burnup is at a maximum, only 92%. Thus, for the purposes of reduction in dimensionality of the problem, only one classification of assemblies in a discharge period is examined. It should be noted that differences in burnups experienced by the aver- age assemblies are reflected in the economic measure of effectiveness to be determined. This measure is based upon the characteristics of the spent-fuel from each discharge period. The specific model to be solved is given as: Maximize ) y Cia Yin . i=0 n=l subject to: | (5.1) tptl 1) )} Yip tigi) =a, ¥ i 87 te 2) )} Yan = Dy ¥on i=0 3) ) aj 7 } by = 0 i= =] 5) Y¥.,. > 0 ¥oi,on where Y;,, n is the decision variable to be determined to yield optimal results. Based upon the evaluation and determination of the components of the measure of effectiveness for the problem as presented in Chapter 4, a computer code is developed. This code is used specifically for the purpose of cost data preparation. Included in Appendix B, this code is developed for more use than that needed for this study. However, for this study, the code determines the effective value of the spent-fuel based upon the value of residual uranium and plutonium less cumulative storage costs during the period of examination. Included in this code are corrections for the decay of fissile Pu-241 which reduce the effective plutonium value while in storage. Based upon the developments in Chapter 4, the profitability or measure of effectiveness that serves as cost coefficients (Cc, are determined for each pair of discharge periods i and demand periods n in the feasible region. Summarized 88 in Table 5.1 are the profitability or cost coefficients for spent~ fuel discharge in the first, fifth, tenth, fifteenth, and twentieth year of the horizon. In the base case, this is for a Westinghouse assembly. As is determined from the data, assemblies discharged later in the horizon actually decrease in value. This is due to the rate of increase in storage costs exceeding the cumulative rate of increase in the value of uranium and plutonium in the spent-fuel. Similar data is obtained for the other PWR systems and the BWR system. This data is listed in Tables 5.2-5.4. B. Implementation of the Model and Procedural Summary The spent-fuel-inventory~-withdrawal model is implemented on the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University IBM computer System/370 Model 1585 using a proprietory mathematical. programming system--MPS IIr,26 and by using the Out-of-Kilter- algorithm. 19 The Out-of-Kilter algorithm developed by Fulkerson is a method of solving minimal-cost network flow problems. The method begins with an arbitrary flow, feasible or not, together with an arbitrary pricing vector, and then uses a labeling procedure to adjust an arc of the net- work that fails to satisfy the appropriate optimality properties. This algorithm is particularly applicable to the Hitchcock problem formula- tion. | MPS III is a modular mathematical programming system consisting of several components. Its BASIC system provides the system control and the standard optimization procedure. This system incorporates a very high-speed matrix inversion method utilizing the preassigned pivot 89 O7T# O7T# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s cCOTEOE cCOTEOE e8reYyoSTG e8reYyoSTG €cccOE €cccOE -— -— ~~ ~~ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -— -— -- -- -~ -~ -- -- -- -- -~ -~ -- -- -- -- -~ -~ -- -- -- -- “—- “—- 7 7 UMd UMd CI# CI# Bsnoysut Bsnoysut ATquesse/$ ATquesse/$ C9TTSZ C9TTSZ e8reyostq e8reyostq 7196472 7196472 8cOTSZ 8cOTSZ T96CSZ T96CSZ YYTOSZ YYTOSZ SE90SZ SE90SZ VIATATA VIATATA -- -- -- -- -~ -~ -~ -~ -- -- -- -- -~ -~ “— “— —- —- -~ -~ -~ -~ ------ —— —— som som — — ATquessy ATquessy OT# OT# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s 0890T7¢ 0890T7¢ OT8TT2 OT8TT2 esreyostq esreyostq $97602 $97602 T¥7602 T¥7602 EL9I0TZ EL9I0TZ T9ETIZ T9ETIZ €S9602 €S9602 £L8602 £L8602 VTOTTZ VTOTTZ SLSTT? SLSTT? 6ELTIZ 6ELTIZ £67602 £67602 ase) ase) -~ -~ -- -- -~ -~ -- -- -— -— — — “7 “7 7-7 7-7 7 7 tog tog oseg oseg AITTTQeITjorg AITTTQeITjorg C# C# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s esz1eyosTGq esz1eyosTGq TOVC8T TOVC8T OT¢csTt OT¢csTt eTOT8T eTOT8T OOCT8T OOCT8T TEOVLT TEOVLT OLZTLT OLZTLT 76SC8T 76SC8T 6€0c8T 6€0c8T 80ZT8T 80ZT8T £TO0c8T £TO0c8T T¢eST8t T¢eST8t 90S081 90S081 €cO08T €cO08T GO608T GO608T 7S69LT 7S69LT L7989T L7989T TEVTST TEVTST -- -- -~ -~ -- -- “7 “7 “T°S “T°S | | eTqQeBL eTqQeBL T# T# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s esreyostq esreyostq OZ69ST OZ69ST STOSST STOSST E88srvl E88srvl O€094VT O€094VT cOLOVT cOLOVT CECBET CECBET 607EET 607EET CCVSst CCVSst TEO8ST TEO8ST 99cLST 99cLST 68S9GT 68S9GT 9LT9ST 9LT9ST 979SST 979SST V88IST V88IST cOEEVT cOEEVT 66LSET 66LSET L86LST L86LST LOLLST LOLLST 860LST 860LST LESLST LESLST TEC8ST TEC8ST cb66L cb66L O86. O86. qeaz qeaz €86T €86T C86T C86T 6L6T 6L6T 8L6T 8L6T €66T €66T T66T1 T66T1 O66T O66T 686T 686T 886T 886T 9861 9861 Ss6rl Ss6rl T86L T86L LL6. LL6. 966T 966T 766T 766T L86L L86L Y86T Y86T L66T L66T G66T G66T 90 OZ# OZ# ATquesse/¢ ATquesse/¢ Be8reYyoSTG Be8reYyoSTG O09€66¢ O09€66¢ TECOOE TECOOE -- -- -~ -~ -= -= -- -- -~ -~ -7 -7 -- -- -- -- -~ -~ -- -- -— -— -~ -~ ~~ ~~ —— —— -- -- -— -— -— -— -= -= = = CL# CL# Ud Ud ATquesse/s ATquesse/s eSsa2eyostq eSsa2eyostq T9C8492 T9C8492 0S9872 0S9872 $9S0SZ $9S0SZ 60EL4VC 60EL4VC 78L89C 78L89C TECOSZ TECOSZ GLLLYZ GLLLYZ MY MY -- -- 77 77 -- -- ~~ ~~ -- -- -~ -~ -~ -~ -—— -—— ------ -— -— “7 “7 7 7 7 7 a - - a ATquossy ATquossy OT# OT# ATquesse/¢ ATquesse/¢ eszeyostq eszeyostq €€L602 €€L602 708602 708602 068L0¢ 068L0¢ 9T0602 9T0602 6S€602 6S€602 899L0Z 899L0Z 8L9802 8L9802 €8cL0Z €8cL0Z CLYLO~ CLYLO~ LS%L02 LS%L02 S89802 S89802 T£S602 T£S602 ase) ase) teqg teqg -— -— -- -- -= -= ~— ~— -- -- “= “= —— —— -— -— -—- -—- AITTTqQeITJOI[g AITTTqQeITJOI[g aseg aseg C# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s 6Y0L9T 6Y0L9T eszeyostq C8ECLT C8ECLT 87969T 87969T T6TSLT T6TSLT 96L8LT 96L8LT STE8SLT STE8SLT SLCSLT SLCSLT TOS6LT TOS6LT ETL6ZT ETL6ZT €876LT €876LT COVELT COVELT €6c08T €6c08T €686LT €686LT 7L908T 7L908T STEO8T STEO8T S8708T S8708T [9808T [9808T —- —- ~~ ~~ -- -- -- -- °Z"G °Z"G STqPL STqPL T# T# AT AT quasse/¢ quasse/¢ es8reyostg es8reyostg COVVET COVVET OCSVYT OCSVYT 6£0CET 6£0CET CVELYT CVELYT ZC8T4VI ZC8T4VI TSZ6ET TSZ6ET 6089€T 6089€T 60€0ST 60€0ST 9VSYST 9VSYST 9¢07ST 9¢07ST SOVEST SOVEST 8E09ST 8E09ST 979SST 979SST VLCECST VLCECST 9ST9ST 9ST9ST LOOSST LOOSST SIL9ST SIL9ST EVE9ST EVE9ST TS67ST TS67ST GES9ST GES9ST TZESST TZESST 1zaR 1zaR O86T O86T SL6T SL6T €86T €86T C86T C86T T86T T86T 6L6T 6L6T LL61 LL61 O66T O66T 986T 986T 786T 786T 886T 886T S86T S86T €66T €66T c66L c66L T66T T66T 686T 686T L86T L86T 766T 766T L66T L66T 966T 966T C66T C66T 91 Oc# Oc# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s Bsaeyostg Bsaeyostg VCLOLT VCLOLT LE69L7 LE69L7 -- -- -— -- -- ------~ -~ -~ ~~ -- ~~ ~~ “ “ -- -~ -~ -- -- -—— -—— UMd UMd Sup~AssuyZuyq Sup~AssuyZuyq CT# kjquesse/s kjquesse/s esreyostq OT80EZ OT80EZ TVE6TC TVE6TC 6976770 OL08272 OL08272 O9CTIES O9CTIES £96822 £96822 60687272 60687272 -~ -~ ------— -— -- -—- ------—- -—- -—- -—~ -—~ -—- -—- uopisnquog uopisnquog OT# OT# - - ATquesse/s ATquesse/s ATquessy ATquessy esazeyostq esazeyostq cOEC6I cOEC6I 6cSC6L 6cSC6L 8SVC6T 660£6T 660£6T GLLC6L GLLC6L C97C6T VIET6L C67IST C67IST TOE TOE STTT6T STTT6T SOLT6I SOLT6I 8S77C6T 8S77C6T s) oseg ase) ~~ ~~ ------—— -- -- -~ -~ ------—- T6L T6L teg teg AITTTqeqrTyorg AITTTqeqrTyorg G# G# ATquesse/¢ ATquesse/¢ e31eyoOsTG e31eyoOsTG 89779T 89779T c9CS9T c9CS9T €0679T €0679T O€LS9T V607ST V607ST ”006ST 9879ST 9879ST G¢CSS9T G¢CSS9T 699T9T 699T9T SOSS9T SOSS9T cC88s9T ”V7C99T 87¢99T 6cL99T 6cL99T 967991 967991 96C99T 96C99T T9S99T T9S99T ------ -- -- —- "e°CS "e°CS T# ATquesse ATquesse aTqey aTqey e8reyostq CST9CT CST9CT O€ O€ TSccel T9VTVT O6LTCT O6LTCT 6098ET 6098ET L6LOET L6LOET 8L8SET 9c0CVT SOECVT 667C7T 667C7T 998¢VT LSTEVT LSTEVT L96ECT L96ECT 677E7T 677E7T 6E8CVT 6E8CVT C9CVVT C9CVVT 69TEVT 69TEVT 76074T 76074T TE6EvT TE6EvT Tevevt Tevevt 78ZT 78ZT /¢ /¢ _T66T _T66T Te98K Te98K 6L6T 6L6T O86T TS6T €S6T CS6T CS6T 986T 986T S86T S86T Y86L Y86L LL6T LL6T SL6T 056T LS6T LS6T 686T 686T S86T S86T €66T €66T 266T 266T 7667 7667 C66T C66T 966T 966T L66T L66T 92 O@# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s vOECIT vOECIT eszeyostq L9LTIT -~ -~ ------a a -- -- -~ -~ -- -- -~ -~ -- -- -— -— -- -- “7 “7 ~— ~— -- -- -~ -~ “= “= -- -- 7“ 7“ — — CT# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s g/ama g/ama esreyostq €8S¢6 €8S¢6 699€6 699€6 77776 77776 C7676 C7676 67916 67916 GSEE6 GSEE6 -~ -~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ -- -- -- -- — — -— -— -- -- -~ -~ -~ -~ “7 “7 ~— ~— 7 7 aD aD - - ATquessy ATquessy Ol# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s BPSrzeyosTg C6LLL C6LLL s) oseg ase) O8e8Z O8e8Z ScO8L ScO8L 967LL 967LL VOOLL VOOLL €SE9l 8TO9L 8TO9L 6TLSL 6TLSL €T7SL €T7SL Jog Jog Gccsl Gccsl STE9L STE9L L6TLL L6TLL -~ -~ -~ -~ -— -— -- -- -- -- -- -- —~ —~ —— —— 7 7 AVTTTQeITJOAg AVTTTQeITJOAg G# G# ATquesse/s ATquesse/s e8reyostaq e8reyostaq GSGLS9 GSGLS9 OcECYI OcECYI 06199 06199 £6199 £6199 06TS9 06TS9 VET?O VET?O S799 S799 cT6S9 cT6S9 78299 78299 8TTS9 8TTS9 05679 05679 CLLY9 CLLY9 GOCE9 GOCE9 LTTS9 LTTS9 S7T99 S7T99 66999 66999 19099 19099 -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ ~~ ~~ ‘*y"G ‘*y"G STqeL STqeL T# Ajquesse/s Ajquesse/s esaeyostq 8ES67 8ES67 T6éL¥ T6éL¥ 9cE0S 9cE0S OSTTS OSTTS 600¢S 600¢S OT6¢S OT6¢S OT8Es OT8Es SOLES SOLES 8SSEes 8SSEes LEO87 LEO87 L8L8¥ L8L8¥ LY8ES LY8ES 9€6¢S 9€6¢S €70¢S €70¢S €€V7TS €€V7TS 7OB8ES 7OB8ES 9EEES 9EEES GSECS GSECS L60ES L60ES LCECS LCECS LYLTS LYLTS _T66T _T66T 1eaK 1eaK 8L6T 8L6T O86T O86T T86T T86T 066T 066T 6L6T 6L6T C86T C86T €86T €86T 986T 986T 886T 886T c66T c66T €66T €66T L£L6T L£L6T Y86T Y86T C86T C86T L86T L86T 686T 686T 766T 766T S66T S66T 966T 966T L66T L66T 93 L6 L6 ( ( V—() V—() G6 G6 YMd OW OW 1 esnoyZutysem €6 €6 T6 T6 g0TAg g0TAg es1eyostg 77 77 2e0TAd 2e0TAd SISO) SISO) wNTuPInN wNTuPInN OMS OMS e8e10I1S e8e10I1S 68 68 aodTIg aodTIg S180) S180) -8°T4a -8°T4a 3sT ZOTT ZOTT di di T T ZOZT ZOZT uUNTUReIN uUNTUReIN 9888109S 9888109S -— 408 408 Ms Ms £8 £8 ATquessy 4. 4. ¥ ¥ UVaA UVaA 408 408 4 4 7x08 7x08 YOZT YOZT $8 $8 + + * * teg + AIT[TQeaTjorag €8 €8 T8 T8 “*T'¢ 6 6 eanBTy 6L 6L ry ry LL LL p p OOT SéT SéT OST OST SLT SLT 002 002 O22 O22 (¢_OT X) SieTTOG 94 16 16 UI} UI} Q) Q) oa oa J} J} Q/UMA Q/UMA () () $3800 $3800 ‘) ‘) S6 S6 0 0 WAWVSTY WAWVSTY s]so9 s]so9 NMS NMS , , \—O—? \—O—? ZOZ ZOZ $380) $380) £6 £6 untTuein untTuein () () | | T T [TeAseuey [TeAseuey 408 408 ams ams A A a988102S a988102S 16 16 . . 0 0 eBreyosTq eBreyosTq () () () () O09 O09 Y%O8 Y%O8 $380) $380) 68 68 () () Oy Oy pt pt AsT AsT $2800 $2800 283e8102S 283e8102S QO — — aSPe) aSPe) ATqmessy ATqmessy Lg Lg OMS OMS 9 9 “ “ V V YVaA oseg oseg ¥Y0OZT ¥Y0OZT s3sop s3sop Z08 Z08 A A Or Or v v cg cg tog tog Y Y wnyTuein wnyTuein AAT[TTqQeaTjoAg AAT[TTqQeaTjoAg C7 C7 Oat Oat €8 €8 . . OS OS ZOZT ZOZT A A ALLE ALLE 18 18 y y oo oo °7°S °7°S o.-0--O-# o.-0--O-# vsan3BqTy vsan3BqTy 6 6 Or Or v v “ “ TS¥ TS¥ [°° [°° J J CC CC hcg hcg *o/ oy oy \ \ Tete Tete Oe Oe 0° 0° (¢_OT X) SaeTTOG 95 procedure for sparse matrix inversion. The VARIFORM module prepares a model for solution, solves the model, and prints the answers from the solution. The VARIFORM Module can be instructed to minimize or maximize the objective function, thus yielding a user determined optimization. Additional features of the MPS III system are described in the liter- ature.26 Initial trial executions are attempted to determine which of the two solution techniques are to be used. The Out-of-Kilter algorithm offers a reduction in the data handling but proved less computationally efficient. An average execution of the Out-of~Kilter code yields optimal results after 43 minutes of CPU time. The MPS III system has the disadvantage of much data handling but a typical execution time averages only 30 seconds. Thus, the withdrawal problem is solved using the MPS III system. The procedure for obtaining solutions for the spent-fuel-withdrawal problem involves two basic computations. The first is the analysis of the base case data as established in Chapter 4. This involves the calculation of the cost coefficients as given partially in Tables 5.1- 5.4 from the data generating code. Each of the primary cost components, uranium costs, separative work costs, and storage costs, are utilized at their projected values.| The second phase of the computation involves testing the sensi- tivity on the first discharge's profitability are shown in Figures 5.1 and 5.2 for the Westinghouse and General Electric systems. Note that uranium prices and storage costs prove to be the most sensitive para- 96 meters that determine the profitability of the spent-fuel with time for this study. When storage costs increase at a rate greater than that for the value of uranium and plutonium in an assembly, a loss in value occurs with time. This is particularly true for 120% storage cost and 80% uranium cost projections. When the value of the uranium and plutonium in the assembly increases at a rate that far exceeds the rate of increase of the storage costs, a noticeable increase in profit- ability per assembly over time is noted. This is the case for 120% of the uranium price, and for 80% of the storage cost projections. Little effect on the profitability profile is noted for variations in the price of separative work. The final step in the analysis of the model is to determine the effect of prohibiting plutonium recycle so that only uranium recycle occurs. Depicted in Figures 5.3 and 5.4 are the Westinghouse PWR and GE BWR profitability profiles for the first discharge under the con- dition of no plutonium market. As can be seen, from the profiles, a notable decrease in the profitability versus time occurs for all cases except 120% of uranium price and 80% of storage costs. This is attributed to the fact that without plutonium recycle, the value of the spent-fuel is minimized to a point that the addition of holding costs each year exceeds the rate at which the uranium in the spent-fuel increases in value. A very slight increase in value with time is noted for the 120% uranium price and 80% storage costs profiles. How- ever, once again, as time in storage increases, the value begins to decrease and a measureable loss is incurred. 97 UMd UMd () aw L6 - -—+_¥ ase) SSR ISsnoySutTjsem ISsnoySutTjsem S SS oseg SISO) eoTag S6 Y S3S09) fo ZOZT AMS BA wntuesin SA a8e10I3S fenTeA fenTeA £6 +$—+ — \ YOZT Sp 708g wNTUoINTg wNTUoINTg 16 O + + , Sp = ¢ Yn + 6 Ss oN oN 68 = 4+ O SS e8zeyostg e8zeyostg + CO) S}]SOD 9oTAg L8 pas ¢ ) 4+ Y—9 UVHA - SISO) 98PI0IS wntuesn 3s{T 3s{T Q 4 . . NMS - - .) Sg 4 SSS OQ ATquaessy ATquaessy YZOZI 408 %08 4 () [> €g V HOY Jeg Jeg Q) Q AVITIQeaATjoIg AVITIQeaATjoIg ooo TS + + 2 ¢ 4 _O-—© 6L ath ‘*E*¢ ‘*E*¢ oP yor — TOT, T09 T TOE [ 1° oe aan3Tyq aan3Tyq , Log O~- 0 0 0Z * ~ o. 7 : wy 98 Q/AMA Q/AMA IFARDETY IFARDETY aoTig aoTig S}soj S}soj sooTid Tetsuey Tetsuey wnzuezN wnzuezN a8e101S a8e101S AMS foenyTeA foenyTeA ZOZT YOZT YOZT Z08 Z08 / untuoqnytg untuoqnytg / CO on on - - aBaeyostq aBaeyostq 9-9-0 ast ast - - sooTaig sooTaig — — Se0TIg Se0TIg S380 S380 ATquessy ATquessy €8 €8 t t 00000 wntuein wntuein 28P109S 28P109S NMS NMS 1 1 tog tog ZO8 ZO8 —— —— T8 T8 AIT[TTqeatsorg AIT[TTqeatsorg Y%OZT Y%OZT Z08 Z08 -+— -+— | 6Z 6Z + + T T ‘*H'sS ‘*H'sS Fog T T -¢ -¢ T T pst pst OT- OT- 0 0 G- G- aan8tTy aan8tTy (¢_OT x) saeT Tod 99 Results of the several situations examined are discussed in the next chapter. In particular, the analysis of the results are indicated by the reprocessing scenarios established in Chapter 4. 6. RESULTS A. Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario The optimistic reprocessing scenario assumes the re-initiation of reprocessing in mid-1979. For this assumption, the spent-fuel-withdrawal model as developed in Section 3-D, is optimized using the MPS-III module. The analyses performed are primarily for two distinct cases. The first situation examined assumes the recycle of both plutonium and uranium and associated markets for each. . Results for this case are examined first on the basis of the projected optimistic reprocessing demand capability for each reactor system. Then the demands established are varied by +15% and +30% for purposes of testing solution sensitivity to these changes. The projected optimistic demand discussed in Section 4-B is referred to as the base demand case, while the sensitivity ‘increases reflect their changes appropriately. As discussed in Chapter 5, each of the principal cost elements of the measure of profitability of the spent-fuel assembly are varied by + 204 to determine the sensitivity of the solution to variations in these parameters. Results from each of these variations except for a 120% increase in the uranium price indicate that the Last-In-First—Out (LIFO) policy is an optimal selection rule. This is shown in Figure 6.1. However, when the price of uranium increases from its base by +20%, a modified LIFO policy is determined as the optimal selection rule. This is depicted in Figure 6.2. In general, the results for the optimistic scenario considering both plutonium and uranium recycle 100 101 GHOUVHOSIC Sal TENassv Tand INdadS dO WaaWN UMd esnoysutisamM vo mo 79 79 79 49 79 29 r 99 79 99 "9 or) "9 79 "9 | €S7} €S7} are "9 [oT 79 {179 8; CS CS |16| S]sop 18S 18S is { AOA 94 ofAeUadS rer Z e8ei0ig S6|46| Fee tL tL 99K (6 KAA GaGNVNAd }O08 }O08 ere |9T BuTssevoiday €6| ZO7- | bk YL 48 79 02 76] ele 88 88 79 [eT zr SAITENASSV “NMS A T6 | | BT 76/68 76/68 MIT) G [Z 06/68 ZOZ- GNVWGHd bk ~ ITASTwTAdOQ 79 8T |Z ¢ )) | | | ‘UNTUeIn 18} 18} 79 [eT 4 Tanda 88 40 FY $9 $9 {T "9 £8) UVaA Le CAAA (A lo INddS ZEA [6S eseg 98} CT ZOT- ZCcEeeewaa OFT ALA S| JO ‘$ | 97194 97 A *e3eI102S eTNY 78) WAdWNN | CAA AAT EAL AAA HWZeCceeEesaazs AA AT AA €8| LIE 97 AA A uoTRIOeTeS Cees tT 6S ZB CA Tt ZOT+ OY oF ovr TR tk 18} OA KK HA A cf] KI AO SAMS Paa OL A OF IE Tewr;zdo Fe 070 64) IE Sd LAYS 1 Z%O7+ LT 8Z El | LTEY| ai ‘esea it “ir “T°9 9 €6 I6 06 68 gs| 98] L8 €8 "| $8 8 T8 08 64 9l LL ean3sTy , E 3 y & 6 E 102 CaDSUVHOSIG SAI TENASSV Tanda INddS 40 WaaWiin UMd vo esnoysutjseM 79 9 79 2 79 ” "9 79 3 79 99 99 79 79 "9 79 "9 79 79 |} fT €S717S 9 cT {19 ev #179 479 8; [es |L6| Par 18S ssh 94 | fotTzeusosg c 99/EL ot rr Kk S6\476| eres |? GaONVWAC | | AA O88} "9 9T1OZ] €6| BuTsssv0idey re 78188 9 76| © AO Le 9S0Q SHITENASSVY TEA LT L£ L£ TA lL | | [7 + 26/68 9 IT G ctl 06/68 wNTUeAN AK QNVWaAd QNVWaAd 9 gT |Z |Z otTasturzdg IL | |T8 <. 4 79 Li FIT Be | Tala | HO HO 707+ EK S916S RAPE T 28)/98| YVaA £CE6cessaeas 7 INadS CTA ZL osegq A 97 97 Sei dO 197197 op AAA A 78) ‘feTny WadWn KY AES EECcewaws ZA AA ZECeea ASAE Zo.10,44 94 €8| SY | TT KK uotjoeTes 6S; 6S zB OITA ON OTK S7 cp TS) A Nn 197 G TZ AS O8 UL KLE Tewupiadg |O [ 62/82] x Se 10 | DP ETT] LZ ‘*7°9 9 cb 96 c6 16 06 68 eB] B] es} 78 ZB T8 08 6L 8 LZ 9 1 aANBTy ee - 2 8 Q ™ 103 indicate that the "freshest" discharged fuel should be used first in meeting reprocessing demand. This LIFO policy prevails also for variations in demand by +15% and +30%. The results in Figures 6.1 and 6.2 are for the Westinghouse PWR, which is representative of the PWR systems. An examination of the GE BWR/6 system also yields the LIFO selection rule. Individual results for the cases examined are included in Appendix A. To interpret these figures, and those that will appear in the remainder of this chapter and Appendix A, a note of explanation is appropriate. Associated with the rows of the table are the supply of fuel assemblies. The left end of the table lists the year of discharge and right side lists the associated number of assemblies discharged (supply). Listed at the top of the table is the year of demand and at the bottom of the table, the associated number of assemblies demanded. Also included in the column section is a column denoted as T.: The term Ig denotes the slack inventory or the number of spent~fuel assemblies residing in inventory at the end of the horizon. Optimal decisions are given in the rectangular box enclosed in double lines for emphasis. For example, from Figure 6.1, a partial interpretation is that of the 64 assemblies discharged in 1978, 21 assemblies are used in meeting demand in 1980, with the remaining 43 assemblies left in the storage pool at the end of the horizon. Similar analyses can be performed for each discharge period in the figure. Upon analysis of the different cases in the absence of a plutonium market, non-unique or non-distinctive policies are found. This can be seen in Figures 6.3 and 6.4. Figure 6.3 is the base case analysis for 104 GaDUVHOSIC Sal TEWNaSsv TaNd INAdS dO WaEWN WMd v9 v9 mht mht woo woo 7 7 79 79 79 79 "9 "9 79 79 79 79 9 9 ” ” y y 79 79 "9 "9 79 79 79 79 79 79 esnoyZurjsey 979 979 €Sz €Sz te te Il Il |[79 |[79 1179 1179 8; 8; | | ¢y ¢y Pr Pr zs zs (SP (SP |46| |46| jes jes eS eS PrP PrP 94 94 | | foTieueos Pee Pee 99]€Z 99]€Z Z Z S6|76| S6|76| | | 1% 1% 6 6 AAA AAA | | CaqNVWAG 08) 08) MPI MPI [9T [9T A A €6| €6| Bupsssvoridey 78 78 19k 19k (Oc (Oc 76) 76) $}so9 | | SAITENASSVY gsi gsi TI] TI] T T [er [er Ta Ta 1 1 oseg 76/68 76/68 8c 8c 06/68] 06/68] i i QNVAad jes jes |9E |9E oTystutjzdo eBOe eBOe | | {§ 79 79 on~TeA T8/S9] T8/S9] LT LT (47 (47 88 88 Tanda dO cy cy 8T 8T 28/98] 28/98] ¢ ¢ UVaA | | wNTUOINTY, INHdS ot ot ALA ALA 6S] 6S] ce ce 6T| 6T| 8T 8T eseg (LAE (LAE CTT CTT THETA THETA ZLALA ZLALA 9%]/9% 9%]/9% A A Lz Lz 6L 6L S8| S8| dO Meeceweaa2s Meeceweaa2s AAA AAA QV QV { 78/8] 78/8] a—Tny WaaWNN ON [oy [oy GEesesawaw GEesesawaw ALA ALA 94 94 A A IAI IAI uoTtIoeTVeS CT CT TéS|S¥ TéS|S¥ 6sf 6sf A A EEE EEE EE EE ze] ze] Nn Nn oO oO SY SY A A A A T8| T8| OK OK 4 4 AN AN AA AA A A [oz [oz G G we we LIE LIE A A i i EELS] EELS] OF OF Te Te a) a) A A ~ ~ Tewmpfjadgo [0 [0 62) 62) [7 [7 J J | | | | Le Le ILA ILA LL] LL] [0 [0 [0 [0 82) 82) TY TY LY LY LZ LZ ‘°¢E°g9 9 9 86 86 6 6 %6 %6 T6 T6 68 68 88] 88] £8 £8 €8 €8 CB CB "| "| 8 8 T8 T8 os os 6L 6L QL QL LL LL 9 9 | | xaANsTY & & yy yy & & E E 6 6 105 GaDUVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Tanda INAdS dO WadWnn UMd UMd et VFsnoyZuTjysemM VFsnoyZuTjysemM y9 yo 79 no 79 19 79 79 99 79 %9 79 49 29 79 79 79 79 79 79 || || fo I I et | esz Sy €¥ 479 49 | cS cS i@sP (£6| Cab 8S 8S es { { 94 | | ere Por oTAeualsS oTAeualsS ers 99 99 nese z eb S6|/%6| }E2 }E2 mE |6 | | CaCNVWAC | O81 O81 19K 4s0) 4s0) 91{oz{ €6| BuTssad0aday BuTssad0aday hd) ETE weawa-2 BEE 76) ee 81 4 wnTueIn wnTueIn ls 9 ZI SdITENaSSV 88] ] ZT Ta 76/68 |eziye 79 06/68] ||| EAD ONVWHd be 79 T ZO7T+ ZO7T+ oTAsTuTAdO oTAsTuTAdO T8159 | iT rp 19 dT Be Tand 4 MA. SONTeA SONTeA dO ZEeeeestaaa PO ZA By LT 28/98] UVaA J i 16S LNadS QA |9T t 61 S eseg eseg | UNTUOCTINTY UNTUOCTINTY | A ATLEAST] 97/9” 94 AA Sei dO {§ {§ 94 AAA vB/Es| Le | aTNy aTNy WadWnNn y CN ee “A ZL OT 7) OHBS KK DPI ON ON aa ee Ut uoTIDeTeS uoTIDeTeS aT A OA 6S[ A ot OF A ze] KEN |S7 oof OH T8| OA A ILE KB AS Oe AA 4 | 9z] 4 S 7h A OT OF nA. 4 De SL 1) Tewrjadg Tewrjadg 0} 62/82] LO | LO O ET JO ZZ ‘*yH*°g ‘*yH*°g 9 8 €6 76 76 06 68 es] 98] L8 €8 78 c3 T8 08 Bl 6Z LL 9Z| VsaANBTY VsaANBTY S 8 & wy E Q 106 the cost parameters, and Figure 6.4 depicts the solution for 120% of the uranium prices for the Westinghouse PWR. As can be interpreted from the figures, some of the "freshest" spent-fuel is utilized in meeting demand, but the quantity from a specific discharge period i in meeting demand in period n varies. This proved to be typical of the situations examined in the absence of a plutonium market and for +15% and +30% increases in the demand rates. Further specific results are listed in Appendix A. ‘As can be observed from the analyses of the situations examined, the specific results are that the Last-In-First-Out policy is the optimal choice for selecting spent-fuel from on-site storage when Pu and U recycle occurs. However, no unique or discernable policy exists for the situation in which no plutonium recycle occurs. B. Realistic Reprocessing Scenario The Realistic reprocessing scenario discussed in Section 4-B assumes the start-up of reprocessing in 1981. The sequence of the addition of reprocessing capacity over time is the same for the Realistic Scenario as for the Optimistic Scenario. The only difference is the start-up date. As discussed in the preceeding section, two basic situations are analyzed. The first involves the profitability of spent-fuel with established plutonium and uranium recycle, and the second situation involves only U recycle. Once again for purposes of sensitivity analyses, the Realistic demand rates are varied by +15% and +30%. Also 107 for each execution, the principal value components that determine the profitability of spent-fuel (U prices, SWU costs, and storage costs), are varied from the base measure by +202. Results from these analyses once again indicate that in the absence of Pu recycle, no definative policy is observable. This is depicted in Figures 6.5 and 6.6 for the Westinghouse PWR. Results are for base costs and 120% uranium price, respectively. Similar results of non- unique or non-distinguishable policies are evident where demand is increased by +15% and +30% over the base, and when examined under the different cost component variations of +202. When Pu and U recycle occurs and a market exists for each, the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) selection rule is dominant. Some modifications are noted as is the case once again with an increase of +204 in the projected uranium prices. Representative results for the Realistic Scenario indicating a LIFO policy are given in Figures 6.7 and 6.8. These figures represent the Westinghouse PWR system at all cost vari-~ ations except 120% U prices, and for 120% uranium prices, respectively. The remainder of the results obtained for all cases examined under the Realistic Scenario are given in Appendix A. C. Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario The Pessimistic reprocessing scenario defined in Section 4-B assumes the availability of reprocessing in 1983. As established with the Realistic scenario, the addition of reprocessing capacity over time is the same for the Pessimistic scenarioas for the Optimistic scenario, 108 GADUVHOSIC SAITENASSV Tanda INdadS dO UaaWiIN UMd UMd esnousutTyzsomM esnousutTyzsomM 79 79 "9 "9 "9 79 "9 "9 79 99 79 "9 79 "9 79 "9 79 "9 79 79 79 | = || || || 4] |) i 6 EVS1ZS (et %9 [9 O€ [PEE Sz 179 Ivy 79 79 79 79 Sy es |16| Pe |8S sp AOA 94 | SoTieuecsg 99} 49 T T S6| ee EL "9 16 el 76] | AO GACNVWAG | 08] mr 911 tk] £6) Burssss0riday eel bl vBl6Z 84 9€ 26| 1) $}s05) $}s05) 79 Ke [ST SHITHNASSV I | TG [7 | OL Z}LS 9S €T £ 06) aseg aseg ONVWAd [ds OH 68| OTAST[eBeYy | By - 6 B¥|9E|vE OF THNA aNnTeA 88 7) dO _ [STE Tz 28/98) UVaA iA INAdS AA AAS |v7€ UNTUOINT, aseg | | A A.A 7 VEl6E|TE 4 7€ SB] 40 EEE AN A saTNyY 6eL LAE 78} WAGON Zee AA AA te A LL ON OD EB] | wuotjIeTes AS PK AY TT eT Oz]O A [a7 A a OCP 78 Bawa K A TF) A A Or 4 18} | ry Oe AK O}O i i OL A L OF rb Le a Tewtadg De 64) | Le | Le KS 7 jo 82} |O ‘*¢*gQ LZ 9 Sb €6 76 26 té} 06 88] 68 98] 28} $8 €8 v8] z8 T8 08 eZ 6Z iL| eaNnsBTy- 4 iS & a 5 6 109 CaSUVHOSIC Sal TaNassv Tanda INGdS dO WaAaWAN UMd [ esnoysZutisemM vo "9 "9 79 aio 79 79 79 79 79) 79 79 79} ool 79 woes 79 79 79 |] [| | €7S 8; O€ CE Sz + 79 79 49 | 1S |16| TEP Beer 18S 94 foT~rzeussg 99 TP ¢ S6|76| rrr eZ "9b s}soj 16 16 | GHGNVAAC GHGNVAAC + os|78 PI: 9T/ZE €6| re BuTsssdo0aday wntTueig “lip 76| A l6z SAITENASSVY SAITENASSVY Z9} KI TA | re pz ~oz+ 79 T 2 Z 06/68 QNVNAG QNVNAG izs {ZS oO;ASTTeey fenTeA | | svloe 87ST Pa Be ‘THNd ‘THNd LO dO dO | AALTKIELE 28i9e| UVaA wnTuoj{ntTg 7 lve INAdS INAdS YL PASE ib eseg | Lo ECcewewawa4 vefec a "MLA ssl dO dO 6 ‘fapTny AAAI veles| WHaWNON WHaWNON ON ee tts AAPL On TE Bees yy BLEPEAS uotjoeTes rm rm Tozlo << ON A LT A ze ap oi ET Te} A AK flo A 7 Oe SH A EEE I O8 Pra [Tewr3dg aw [7 7 [0 a 6Zi lo lo eZ} Ae [oO LZ ‘*9°g 6 €6 6 Te 06 68 98 L8 cs| Z8 78| T8 gli 6L iL 9 oAN3Ty wa 4 y ee § 2 & 110 CaDUVHOSIQG SAL'TENASSV Tanda INAdS dO Yamin YMd 19 "9 ef 79 29 "9 "9 "9 79 "9 e "9 79 79 79 79 79 "9 "9 79 esnoyButTjsem | | || | || {| {I €vs}zs [et 499 OF Se 46 7Y 79 79 79 79 79 Sy Ca les $3809 |16| ies AAA 94 | a3e101S foTzeuess 99 MT c¢ ee S6\4%6| AXA | lez mre rare 6}; | GHONVAAG 79 og] ~OZ- OT 9 I €6 BurTssadoaday 78 Hes [oz 26| KL | ‘OMS HX loz SHITENASSV 1 etl z TG | rl #Z[zs ZOZ- € mE 4 06/68| 1” 2 GNVWaAd le ea {Ls KK oTAsT[eay ‘wNTueIn Be 87h Tahd 8B dO 1 Joe 96 28) UVaA | LNadS lve A ve 98| Zo7- osegqg | ve[ee AAA ve SB] 40 ‘eder03g LAA 6€ AAA 8}E8) faTny WadWN [Te Ae eALSA ECceceawe 7 PA Ceea a Pt UA wuotzoeTeS Fozto 0Z A A ees ZB Z%O7+ NY CK OAK Sawa A 18) HK: AK, KKK A AK MT ‘NMS TOTO A A OF KS i) A Ye Tewutjadg 62/82} LT ZOT+ 7 LO fo FA SZ ‘eSPE [0 LZ ‘*/°9 9 6 76 6 16 06 68 es} 98] 8] Se €8 8) T8 08 64 Ql im 9 aaNn3Ty | 5 <4 8 » E 3 lil GaADUVHOSIG SAITERASSV TaNd INddS dO UaaWiiNn UMd UMd Lv9 "9 v9_[Loe 9 m9 9 79 99 79 99 7 79 79 79 9 "9 79 99 ao 79 9 esnoyBuTAssM esnoyBuTAssM | | || || I €7S|zs a |[6 Ice Sz 7 79 79 79 8; Pr (ee (46) |gs 8s 94 | {§ {§ Co Pr ree ofAeuads ofAeuads 99]ez Te S6|%6| | #9 TT CaCNVWAC | | er os] nr Ol 9 eK €6| BuTssao.oiday BuTssao.oiday ve AA [02 | 76) a [z | A lez m9 eT SAITANASSY TA | bo vz] 9h Lids le sop sop 06/68 2 GNVWad 4 zs ETT | rl oTAsT[eoy oTAsT[eoy wnzueIn wnzueIn fou | evloe|ve 89 Tad 88) dO ELLE PL 9¢ 28/98] YVaA INddS 2 CT ZO7+ ZO7+ 7 | sseg sseg | 7 ADEE FAS velec]te WAAC SB] 40 oe ‘{ ‘{ elt AA 78] LL WadWnN atny atny ON Lo AAAS Te EB] | oz Sa ON AP uotzoaeTeSs uotzoaeTeSs et A AX AMA Of a A Ze] Tt SLCSE er OT Jo Te] EI A KK ON MX o Jo fo ee 77 TL 1 I KK, A OF Le XxX ew Oe _ TewrqdQ TewrqdQ 64/82 td I 3 o fo fo LY | ZL *9°9g *9°9g 9 6 $8 76 T6 z6 o6| 88] 68 98| cB) cel yal ce z8 ote ae 61 GL 9 iL xaNnsTy xaNnsTy oy Ss 8 & : 8 © 112 with the only difference being the actual start-up dates. As discussed in Section A, two basic situations are analyzed. The first involves the profitability of spent~fuel with plutonium and uranium recycle, and the second situation involves only uranium recycle. Again, for purposes of sensitivity analyses, the Pessimistic demand rates are varied by +15% and +30%. Also for each execution, the principal value components that determine the profitability of spent-fuel (U prices, SWU costs, and storage costs), are varied from the base values by +20%. Results from the analyses conducted once again indicate that in the. absence of Pu-recycle, no unique policy is observable. This is depicted in Figures 6.9 and 6.10 for the Westinghouse PWR. Results are for base costs and 120% uranium prices, respectively. Similar results of non-uniqueness are evident when demand increases by +15% and +302 over the base demand, and when examined under the different cost component variations of +202. When Pu and U recycle occurs and a market exists for each, the Last-In-First-Out selection rule is again optimal. The only modifi- cations noted are that when demand is increased by 30%, a modified LIFO selection rule is observed when uranium prices are increased by 20% and when separative work prices are decreased by 20%. These representative results for the Pessimistic Scenario are given in Figures 6.11-6.13. The individualized results for the other systems examined are given in Appendix A. 113 CaDSAVHOSIG SAI TENASSV Tanda INddS dO YAWN WMd Get esnoysutisem | sto>r 99 79 79 x, 79 79 79 79 79 "9 ue %9 ote 79 79 79 | | || || |] |} }) Wet ELL ce 9€ II 4t TY B 79 79 79 #79 8; | CS} lesp |16| 8S] HOeeCesaaZ ‘Sopzeuscss a 94 + 99, rf c rrr S6|46| er pr ELI nor 6 +r GAQNVWAG 72 79 8 Burssao.0idey €6| 1} | | Seas LO|TS Tivo Se 76] $480) li ri L L SAITANASSVY ar tt TG Lo | | |) ovseq vei wr) 06/68) A GNVWad opAsTMypSsseg TE TE 7 ‘Santea |8z 82 Tahd 88 | dO ZEeeeeesaawa- ttt i ZZ; lt 248) | Sua dvds T7 INddS ALAA. unpuoj{Nntgd Oe 98| sseq re jez | Ez SB} | dO CeCoewewaa ETIO AM ‘So eT 78) WadWnN f AT ON AA ZL Tny AN €8) aA Ce JO LL voTJoeTeS MN CSesewa-a aK Ze} NT | Nt ~ 0 AK OA tet 18} LL A NY) Ue |O <4] Baa O8 eee Le AO O TewT3dQ 2 62/82} J Ll Ke |{O |{O a a al {0 LZ ‘69 96 96 $6 £6 76 c6 16 06 68 gs) L8 8] "| €8 18 6L Sl Ze of | SANBTA -< 5 & 6 ) 114 CaDUVHOSIG SAI TINASSV WMd WMd by § 3 a ~ a 4 A SesnoyZutjAsem SesnoyZutjAsem | 79479 99 79 79 "9 79 79 bets 79 79 79 bo 79 79 79 79 49 79 "9 79 IT | |} || || I || |I |} || fees 9) Iz T €€ HT? ae 79 Ts #79 79 8, 49 49 79 79 7 zsies| icf |46| Por spo fofazaeusos fofazaeusos oe 94 Fe Pe 99} PTA Pere $6|¥6| $4so9 $4so9 €<1zZ vor [6 GAQNVWAC BuLsssvvo0idey BuLsssvvo0idey MEET [8 + £6) WNTUeIQ WNTUeIQ | bP ee Lol CC [Sve z6| 1) TSlyy CV 6 SHITANASSVY Ta | lL | fp" ¥0Z+ ¥0Z+ mre) 06/68| A844 | QNVWad OTASTWISseg OTASTWISseg 7 Te|ez te ‘SenTeA ‘SenTeA s s Tad Se | 40 czjoclez “ 28/98] - UVaAA wnyzuoAnTg wnyzuoAnTg DATA INdadS et AAA OK O€ aseg aseg €Z LAT Sel dO ET Ar ‘satny ‘satny Te v8lEs| WaaWNN on on PP Zt AT o Jo |o 2441 AA KA wa s uorqIeTeS uorqIeTeS A TT tO LEELA LE, ELE Ze NA PAZ CAS wees |o A TILE T8| 2) Pk KI ss ri a Ay IEE o o lo |o jo Oe OT O8 nt EI Teutadg Teutadg ~ i 62) | Is AZ | ra | — le 82) LY LAY jo jo ZZ ‘“OT’9 ‘“OT’9 96 €6 76 2 T6 06 68 88] €8 = 78 Z8 T8 08 eZ 62 LL 9 | 2aNsTY 2aNsTY | , s é a 115 GaDSUVHOSIC SAI TENASSV UMd UMd S}S0) md md 5 5 w w ° ° : : B B EB EB Vsnoysutysem Vsnoysutysem 179 179 ro ro "9 "9 os os = = 79 79 99 99 79 79 ade102g pot pot 79 79 "9 "9 [%9o [%9o "9 "9 79 79 "9 "9 ”9 ”9 "9 "9 "9 "9 79 79 79 79 79 79 5 5 i i || || || || | | || || || || HT HT |] |] || || Hl Hl ELL} ELL} zr zr 9 9 8; 8; €f €f 11 11 9€ 9€ TY TY [ts [ts ve ve ee ee 79 79 v9 v9 49 49 79 79 49 49 79 79 79 79 | | ZO7- ZS ZS |esP |esP |46| |46| Per Per |e |e ss ss ‘fotreusds ‘fotreusds A A eee eee “AMS 94 94 | | "9 "9 99/ 99/ ¢ ¢ i i Per Per S6|%6| S6|%6| Tia Tia ZOZ- Ez Ez BE BE 7 7 [é [é ds ds |zZ |zZ CHONVWHC CHONVWHC ButTssedoiday ButTssedoiday [ele [ele 9 9 “uNTUeIn A A €6| €6| | | eh eh es es 29] 29] mb mb 76] 76] A A TS TS (ep (ep SAI'TEWASSVY SAI'TEWASSVY Td Td Le Le ZOT- volte volte wuesSeBaA wuesSeBaA 06/68| 06/68| QNVWad OTAstwEsseg OTAstwEsseg te te ‘eBez01S ez ez Be Be (A (A THNA THNA 88 88 dO 4zjoe 4zjoe Zé Zé 48/98| 48/98| Uvaa (ALAA (ALAA INZAS INZAS Fare Fare Z%OZT+ Of Of ALA ALA AAA AAA eseg eseg | | FREESE FREESE eztetlo eztetlo €2 €2 SB SB “NMS 40 40 ET ET LAA LAA ‘atTny ‘atTny AL AL 78) 78) WAGWON WAGWON eeea eeea LL LL ZOT+ FFL FFL AY AY E8| E8| AAAI AAAI A A A A fo fo TS TS uoTj.eTes uoTj.eTes PAA PAA LA LA A A OF OF AAA AAA a a LAA LAA ze] ze] “WNTURIQ fo fo ON ON A) A) a a A A Te] Te] A A tk tk fo fo AN AN 7 7 EET EET eT eT OF OF [o [o 08 08 A A FS FS dk dk Tewradg Tewradg aa aa xX). xX). LE LE =e =e 7ZO7T+ 62/82 62/82 LZ LZ Jo Jo | | ea ea lL lL ZL ZL I I LY LY ‘ese | | [o [o | | L L I I ‘{[{T°g9 ‘{[{T°g9 | | | | 16 16 9 9 6] 6] 86 86 kK: kK: 28 28 06 06 gs| gs| 68 68 98] 98] L8 L8 : : 28 28 T8 T8 8 8 08 08 6L 6L RZ RZ 9 9 LL LL ean3Ty ean3Ty | : : & & E E 5 5 oO oO 116 GaDUVHOSIG Sal IENASSV rd rd vag vag UMd UMd wn wn B B - - s s a a esnoysurTqysam esnoysurTqysam ob eT eT 2 2 2 2 " " 99 99 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 eee eee 79 79 979 979 79 79 79 79 ee ee 79 79 79 79 79 79 | | | | |} |} || || || || €8¢ €8¢ SEY SEY 92 92 79 79 79 79 99 99 79 79 8; 8; 79 79 | | 89/c2]98 89/c2]98 PA PA |16| |16| yh yh sotzeusds sotzeusds 94 94 7 7 y y Ky Ky $6761 $6761 ri ri | | c6lv6| c6lv6| [09 [09 A A Get Get CaQNVWAd BuTssodoiday BuTssodoiday nr nr 9c 9c 9 9 AK AK Pir Pir TL TL €6| €6| | | Zel Zel ST ST Sl¢ Sl¢ i i Z6| Z6| tl) tl) 3509 3509 99|2¢ 99|2¢ 9 9 SAITANASSY l= l= A A Ta Ta Fa Fa [4s [4s wntruein wntruein 06/68 06/68 2 2 | | QNVAAG OTASTMUTSSeg OTASTMUTSSeg ong ong Ov Ov Mi} Mi} Aa Aa | | 9€ 9€ pa pa TaNd Be Be Ice Ice ZOc+ ZOc+ dO A A CGCeECceeeeaa CGCeECceeeeaa AALA AALA Weare Weare 28/98 28/98 [6c [6c UVaA ra ra INddS ra ra OT OT 62 62 ~OE+ ~OE+ foe foe A A [OE [OE Ss Ss JO ZT ZT AAA AAA LL LL v8l/es| v8l/es| TMY TMY [Oo [Oo WaEWNN ZL ZL ZEesesawaaA ZEesesawaaA AA AA PEE PEE fo fo ON ON CA CA ea ea uoT_o.eTes uoT_o.eTes SBaara SBaara A A TT TT ZZ) ZZ) 4) 4) zB zB fo fo OY OY Pr Pr fo fo Ts; Ts; OA OA A A Oe Oe AK AK 4 4 MN MN KX KX nA nA I I a4 a4 A A KL KL A A Oe Oe fo fo OS OS ITI ITI OF OF rey rey eee eee Tewt3adQ Tewt3adQ Kk, Kk, JO JO 62) 62) | | 4 4 3 3 LO LO LO LO as as 82| 82| LY LY fo fo 2 2 I I LZ LZ ‘“7ZT°9 ‘“7ZT°9 06 06 86 86 $6 $6 €6 €6 76 76 26 26 68 68 88 88 <8 <8 78| 78| c8 c8 z8 z8 Te Te 64 64 SZ SZ 9Z| 9Z| il il | | eaNnsTy eaNnsTy : : 3 3 & & u u E E 3 3 117 CaDUVHOSIG Sal TEWASsSV Ps Ps UMd Oo Oo Phy Phy ny ny ri ri - - VBsnoysut — — yoy yoy 73 73 "9 "9 "9 "9 29 29 79 79 79 79 99 99 79 79 79 79 “9 “9 79 79 rs rs 79 79 79 79 79 79 || || || || || || €86189 €86189 9 9 8, 8, »z7\7 »z7\7 lL lL ||_¥9 ||_¥9 sem 79 79 49 49 49 49 bor bor v9 v9 |26| |26| . | | ee ee |cz |cz 9 9 fotzeusessg 9 9 € € 94 94 | | | | PA PA 98156 98156 yt yt cc cc S6|76| S6|76| CEI CEI 9 9 y y ra ra AE. AE. CaQNVWaAd | | BurTsseosoiadey lv6 lv6 9 9 42 42 €6l €6l | | 4A 4A 28199 28199 aeeee aeeee |8T |8T GC GC z6| z6| A A Tl) Tl) TE TE 9 9 i i SAITENaSSVY Ta Ta | | ZS ZS LS LS 06/68| 06/68| QNVWad QNVWad ITAsTMTsseg a a Pe Pe 838090 of of Pa Pa 9b 9b A A Be Be Tila rl rl NMS dO dO pL pL selee selee c8l98| c8l98| UdVdA Te Te PAA PAA ALATA ALATA LL LL 407+ INdadS ZA ZA 6€ 6€ YOg+ | | [LT [LT AAA AAA oe}ztjo oe}ztjo O€ O€ Sel Sel 40 “| “| feTNyY “ “ AAS AAS vslcs| vslcs| WadWNn TA TA -T -T jefe jefe PEK PEK TA TA uoT}OeTeS el el SEPA SEPA Lett Lett Py) Py) fo lo lo fo OW OW ze ze KT KT 1 1 Sawa. Sawa. A A tel tel AK AK Ke Ke 7 7 NY NY lo Jo Jo lo A A od od IP IP aot aot TeuTjadgQ La La LLL LLL 7 7 6z[ 6z[ IE IE LC LC Z Z LO LO La La Ke Ke fo Jo Jo fo ez] ez] TY TY 22 22 ‘“ET°9 $8 $8 76 76 €6 €6 o6/ o6/ G G 68 68 es] es] 8} 8} G8 G8 ce] ce] 78 78 T8 T8 tS tS 61 61 el el il il 9Z| 9Z| vsaNnBTy 5 5 8 8 oy oy 3 3 & & 7. CONCLUSIONS It is concluded that the inventory of spent-fuel at on-site storage pools can be modeled both by dynamic programming and linear programming. The formulation of the spent-fuel-inventory-withdrawal model specifically lead to solution-yielding optimal quantities of spent- fuel from a specific discharge to meet reprocessing demand when avail- able. The dynamic formulation proves to be computationally intractable but the linear models are readily solved. From the analyses performed, the conclusion reached by this study is that a Last-In-First-Out policy is the optimal selection rule for ordering the withdrawal of spent-fuel from on-site storage. This policy prevails with the existence of plutonium and uranium recycle. However, current issues, including the use of plutonium and the environmental controversy over nuclear power, have resulted in the cessation of the reprocessing activity. Thus, there has been no closure of the nuclear fuel cycle and there is going to be a continuous backlog of spent-fuel. The policy determined will help reactor operators specify a selection rule to withdraw spent-fuel from the on- site storage pools upon the re-initiation of reprocessing. It is determined in this study that the earliest (optimistic) date for the re-initiation of reprocessing is 1979. Unfortunately, under the current administration policy, even this date appears unlikely. Without a market for plutonium (i.e. no recycle), the question as to the economic disposition of spent-fuel appears even more difficult to answer in an appropriate manner. Without Pu recycle, the remaining 118 119 value in the spent-fuel is'at a minimum if only U recycle occurs. This study concludes that in the absence of a Pu recycle, the economic dispo- ition of spent-fuel is in even greater jeopardy, as no definitive or general policy is established. An important trend to be noted is that if the negative costs associated with determining a net economic gain from spent-fuel (i.e. storage costs, reprocessing costs, and the fabrication penalties) continue to increase at a rate faster than inflation and/or an asso- ciated increase in the recoverable value for uranium and plutonium, the net value of a spent-fuel assembly decreases with time. This results in an increase in the power costs from nuclear power as long as the questions with regard to the disposition of spent~fuel remains unanswered. To be concluded from this study is that uranium prices and storage costs are the parameters to which the model and thus the system are most sensitive. Fluctations in the cost of separative work has little influence on the optimal policies. 8. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The models developed consititute a worthwhile tool for evaluating spent-fuel management stategies. In light of the present controversy over spent nuclear fuel reprocessing, the models developed should be employed to analyze the importance of contemplated policy changes upon the nuclear industry. Numerous plausible reference cases should be identified and analyzed to measure the impact on the industry of policy changes. It is worth noting that reprocessing of both plutonium and uranium appears to offer significant benefits to the nuclear industry in the form of economic gain, and to the public in the form of resource conservation with a greater availablity of energy. As a consequence of this study, it is recommended that the present and anticipated govern- ment policy on spent nuclear fuel reprocessing be re-examined relative to the results of this analysis. There are several areas of future study which are of interest for extending this analysis of the spent-fuel-inventory-withdrawal problem. The first of these areas is to determine the full range of the useful- ness of the models developed. In the analysis presented, three models have been developed ignoring the constraint of pool capacity. It should be noted that an extension of these nodels would be to constrain the storage pool capacity as to the number of assemblies that can be held in storage, and analyze the effect of this constraint on the optimal policy. A second area of interest would be to incorporate probability into the model. This would involve establishing an additional con- 120 421 straint that would reflect the probability of assembly failure which could possibly influence the optimal policy. The study involving this probability is beyond the scope of this thesis and has not been examined. It is appropriate to note however that present fuel cladding designs and fuel burnup rates are not oriented toward extended storage. Asa result of these physical constraints, severe cost penalties, not represented in this model may develop. For example, the cost penalty associated with a cladding failure may force a strict First-In-First- Out (FIFO) policy as opposed to the optimal LIFO policy. Specifically as a result of this study, it is recommended that a Last-In-First—Out policy be adopted for managing the inventory of spent-fuel in on-site storage. This policy would take effect upon the resumption of the reprocessing activity and the establishment of | plutonium and uranium recycle. 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY "Alternatives for Managing Wastes From Reactors and Post~Fission Operations in the LWR Cycle," ERDA 76-43, May 1976. Anderson, Earl V., "Nuclear Energy: A Key Role Despite Problems," Chemical and Engineering News, March 7, 1977. Bebbington, William P., 'The Reprocessing of Nuclear Fuels," Scientific American, December 1976. Benedict, Manson, and Thomas H. Pigford, Nuclear Chemical Engi- neering, McGraw-Hill Co., Inc., Toronto, 1957. "Benefit Analysis of Reprocessing and Recycling Light Water ‘Reactor Fuel,'' ERDA 76-121, December 1976. Bowman, Edward H., "Production Scheduling by the Transportation Method of Linear Programming," Operations Research, Volume 4, Number 1, February 1956, pp. 100-103. Buffa, Elwood S., and William H. Taubert, Production-Inventory Systems Planning and Control, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Iil., 1972. Carolina Power and Light Company, Raliegh, N. C., personal commu- nication ~- Mr. Bill Stocks, March 24, 1977. “Carter Vs. Plutonium: The Battle is Joined," Nuclear News, Volume 20, Number 7, May 1977. 10. Deonigi, D. E., "The Value of Pu Recycle in Thermal Reactors," Nuclear Technology, Volume 18, Number 80, May 1973. 11. Draper, E. Linn, and M. John Voltin, Jr., "Sensitivity of Total Fuel Cycle Costs to Variations in Enrichment Tails Assay Stategies,' t Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Volume 22, November 1975. 12. Duderstadt, James J., and Louis J. Hamilton, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1976. 13. "Environmental Impact of Electrical Power Generation: Nuclear and Fossil," Pennsylvania Department of Education, ERDA-69, 1975. 14. "Environmental Survey of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," WASH-1250, 1974. 15. "Environmental Survey of the Reprocessing and Waste Management Portions of the LWR Fuel Cycle," NUREG-0116, 1976. 122 123 16.. Eschbach, E. A., "Plutonium Value Analysis," Proceedings of the Third International Conferences on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 1964, Volume 11, pp. 47-55, United Nations, New York, N. Y., 1965. 17. "Final Generic Environmental Statement on the Use of Recycle Plutonium in Mixed Oxide Fuel in Light Water Cooled Reactors,” NUREG-0002, August 1976. 18. Ford, L. R., and D. R. Fulkerson, Flows in Networks, Princeton University Press, New Jersey 1962. 19. Fulkerson, D. R., "An Out-Of-Kilter Method for Minimal-Cost Flow Problems," Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Volume 9, Number 1, 1961. 20. ‘Gaussens, J., and H. Paillot, Study of the Long Term Values and Pricesof Plutonium, CEA-12-2795, 1964. 21. "GESMO Hearing Begins,'’ Nuclear News, Volume 20, Number 1, January 1977. 22. Leskovjan, Larry L., David J. Rose, and Patrick W. Walsh, "Nuclear Power -~- Compared to What?,'' American Scientist, Volume 64, May- June 1976. 23. Lieberman, M. A., "United States Uranium Resources -- An Analysis of Historical Data," Science, Volume 192, April 30, 1976, pp. 431- 436. 24. "LWR Spent Fuel Disposition Capabilities 1976-1985," ERDA-25, May 1976. 25. Macek, Victor, Optimization of Time and Location Dependent Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Capacity, Unpublished Ph.D.-Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, March 1977. 26. Mathematical Programming System -- Extended MPSX, and Generalized Upper Bounding (GUB), Management Science Systems, Inc., Rockville, Md., 1974. 27. Modern Energy Technology, Research and Education Association, New York, Volume 1, 1975. 28. Nachlas, Joel A., Harold A. Kurstedt, Jr., David W. Swindle, Jr., and K. 0. Korez, "Modeling the Optimal Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel," Eighth Annual Pittsburgh Conference on Modeling and Simu- ‘lation, Pittsburgh, April 1977. 29. Nemhauser, George L., Introduction to Dynamic Programming, John- Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1966. 124 30. "Nuclear Fuel Cycle," ERDA-33, March 1975. 31. "Nuclear Fuels Policy, Report of the Atlantic Council's Nuclear Fuel Policy Working," The Atlantic Council of the United States, 1976. 32. Nuclear News, Volume 19, Number 1, January 1976. 33. Nuclear News, Volume 19, Number 11, September 1976. 34. Nuclear News, Volume 19, Number 15, December 1976. 35. Nuclear News, Volume 20, Number 3, Mid-February 1977. 36. "Reprocessing: How Necessary Is It For The Near Term?," Science, . Volume 196, April 1, 1977. 37. "Reprocessing Linked With World Accords," Nuclear Industry, Volume 23, Number 11, November 1976. 38. Roberts, Richland W., "Technical Reports on the Nuclear Fuel Cycle,’ ' Transactions of: the American Nuclear Society, Volume 24, Number 1, November 1976. 39. Taha, Hamdy A., Operations Research An Introduction, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1971. 40. Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tenn., personal communi- cation -- Mr. Bob Mullens, November 1976. 41. Vanstrum, P. R., and Wm. J. Wilcox, Jr., "Alternative Technologies for Meeting Uranium Enrichment Demands," Paper presented at American Institute of Chemical Engineers' 69th Annual Meeting, December 1-2, 1976. 10. APPENDIX 125 126 Appendix A This section contains the results of implementing the spent fuel withdrawal model on the IBM-370 computer system, These tabulated results reflect the optimal selection rules as established for each of the reprocessing scenarios examined. The title accompanying each figure indicates: 1. Specific reprocessing scenario, i.e. Optimistic, Realistic, or Pessimistic as established in Chapter 4, Section B, 2. the specific reprocessing scenario case examined, i.e. Base Optimistic reprocessing, +15% Optimistic reprocessing, or +30% Optimistic reprocessing as established in Chapter 4, Section B for purposes of sensitivity analyses, 3. the reactor from which the spent assemblies originated, i.e. Westinghouse PWR, Babcock and Wilcox PWR, Combustion Engineering PWR, or General Electric BWR/6 as discussed in Chapter 4, Section A, and 4. the status of the economic parameters that establish a measure of effectiveness, i.e. Base Costs (all costs at values estab- lished in Chapter 4, Section C), +20% SWU Costs, +20% Uranium Prices, and +20% Storage Costs from the base costs established in Chapter 4, Section C. Following this page is a listing of all figures in AppendixA indicating the results for the Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario, the Realistic Reprocessing Scenario and the Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario. This 127 section includes listings for each of the four NSSS examined. An explanation of interpreting the figures is given in Chapter 6, Section A. 128 LIST OF FIGURES -- APPENDIX A Figure Title Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario, Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, -20% Swu, -20% Uranium, +20% Storage, -~20% Storage Costs* * * * * * © * # «© » 137 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR +20% Uranium Cost * * * © * © * © © « « 138 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reporcessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * « «= « 139 Optimal Selction Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost ° e 140 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Uranium Cost °> 141 A-6 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Storage Cost « 142 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Storage Cost °* 143 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Scenario; Babcock and Wilcox PWR Base Costs* * * * © © © © 8 8 ¢ © « « » 144 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Scenario; Combustion Engineering PWR Base Costs o © e e ee «© #© © © e© © #@ @ @ 145 A-10 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +204 Uranium Costs* * * * * * « » 146 A-11 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * « ° 147 129 Figure Title A-12 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * « 148 A-13 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, -20Z SWU, +20% Uraniun, -20% Uranium, +20% Storage, -20% Storage Costs* * * ° ° 149 A-14 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * « * » « 150 A-15 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost - © 151 A-16 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Uranium Cost °* © 152 A-17 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Scenario;. Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +204 Storage Cost °* ¢ 153 A-18 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20Z% Storage Cost ° © 154 A-19 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +204 Uranium Costs* * * * * ss * ¢ 155 A-20 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Piutonium Value; Base Costs* * * ¢ » » 156 A-21 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Optimistic Scenario; General Electric: BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost °¢ » 157 A-22 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, -20% SWU, +20Z% Uraniun, ~-20% Uranium, +20% Storage, -20% Storage Costs* + * * * 158 130 Figure Title Page A-23 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value, Base Costs* * * * * * © © * © © © * * 159 A-24 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium, -20% Uranium Costs* + * 160 A-25 Optimal Selection Rule; +304 Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Storage Cost * * * * * * * + © © 161 A-26 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Storage Cost * * * * * * © © * © 462 A-27 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +20% Uranium Costs* * * * * * © © © © #© © *© *© e ¢ © 163 A-28 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * © © © #© © © © © «© © 164 A~29 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Optimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * + * * © * © © + « 165 A-30 Optimal Selection Rule, Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +204 SWU, -~20% SWU, -—20% Uranium, +20% Storage, -20% Storage Costs* * * * © © # © # e e © s © © 8 #® #® # » 166 A-31 Optimal Selection Rule, Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR +207 Uranium Cost > © e@ © © © © © # © © © © © © © # #© & #8 167 A~32 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR. No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * * © s © © # © «© 168 A-33 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +204 Uranium Cost * * * © © © «© © © «© 169 131 Figure Title A-34 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Uranium Cost * * * * * « » 170 A-35 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Storage Cost * * * * * * 171 — A-36 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Storage Cost * + * * * « » 172 A-37 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Babcock and Wilcox PWR Base Case * © © © © © © © @© © © © © © © © © © &© 8 @ 173 A-38 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing | Scenario; Combustion Engineering PWR Base Case e e e ° e ° ° e ° s e ° ° ° e e e e e e ® -174 A-39 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +20% Uranium Costs* * * * © © * * © *« « «© # « 175 A-40 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * * *© «© « » 176 A-41 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * * « « 177 A-42 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, -20% SWU, -20% Uranium, -20% Storage, —-204% Storage Costse* * «© © © © © © © © e © # © # « e 178 A~-43 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR: +20% Uranium Cost * «© © © © © © © 8» © © © © 8 8» @© @ 179 A-44 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR . No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * * © * « « 180 132 Figure Title A-45 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * * « » 181 A-46 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20%Z Uranium Cost * * * * * « » 182 A-47 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Storage Cost * * * * * @ » 183 A-48 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Storage Cost * * * * * « =» 184 A-49 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing — Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +20% Uranium Costs* * * * * * © * © © * * # » 185 A-50 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * * * © « » 186 A-51 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +202 Uranium Cost * * * * * « « 187 A~-52 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, -20Z SWU, -20% Uranium, +20% Storage, -~2?07% Storage Cost * * «© © # #© 2 e e eo © © ee © @ @« 8 188 A-53 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR +207 Uranium Cost ee e@ «© © © e#© ®@® e@# # @# © 8© 8 09 @© © @ 189 A-54 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR’ No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * * « * # » 190 A-55 Optimal Selection Rule; +304 Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost ° cs et es 191 133 Figure Title A-56 Optimal Selection Rule; +304 Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Uranium Cost + **** * + * 192 A-57 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Storage Cost * * * * * © «= *¢ 193 A-58 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Storage Cost * * * * * * 2 s 194 A-59 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +20% Uranium Costs* * * * * * © © © * ¢ «© «© « 195 A-60 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * * © © © « » 196 A-61 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Realistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * *© © « » 197 A~62 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, -20% SWU, +20% Uranium, ~20% Uranium, +20% Storage, ~20%Z Storage Costs» * * + * * «© © « « « 198 A~63 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * © * © © © *© © » 199 A-64 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * * * « 200 A-65 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR’ No Plutonium Value; -20% Uranium Cost * * * * * * = 201 A-66 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +204 Storage Cost * * * * * * ¢ » 202 A-67 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Storage Cost * * * * * * « « 203 134 Figure Title A-68 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Babcock and Wilcox PWR Base Costs» eo © © «© «© © © © © © @© © © © © © © © © #© «€ @ 204 A-69 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Combustion Engineering PWR Base Costs? . ° e ° e oe ® e © e e e e ° ® e e * e s e e 205 A-70 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +20% Uranium Costs, No Plutonium Value Base Costs 206 A-71 Optimal Selection Rule; Base Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Costs* * * * * © * « » 207 A-72 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario: Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, -20% SWU, +20% Uranium, -20% Uraniun, +20% Storage, -20% Storage Costs»: * * * * * * © *« # « « ¢ 208 A-73 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * *« © ¢ « ¢ « e * 209 A-74 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario;, Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * * © © © » 210 A-75 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Uranium Cost * *+ * * * * + « 211 A-76_ Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Storage Cost * * * * * © * * » 212 A-77 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR. No Plutonium Value; -20% Storage Cost * * * * * * * © » 213 A-78 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +204 Uranium Costs* * ** * * * * * * * * © ¢ # 8 214 135 Figure Title A-79 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * © * * *« * « 215 A-80 Optimal Selection Rule; +15% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * * * + » 216 A-81 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR Base, +20% SWU, -20% Uranium, +20% Storage, -20% Storage Costs e e ° e e e e e e e ° o e eo . ° e e ° e » e e e 217 A-82 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR -207 SWU Cost eo «© © © © # e@© © # © © #8 @© © #© © # #© @ @ ° 218 | A-83 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR +2027 Uranium Cost « ° ee © © © © © ee fe ee ee lt 219 A-84 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * * © * *« © « » 220 A-85 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * * © © « 221 A-86 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; -20% Uranium Cost * * * * * © « « 222 A-87 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR No Plutonium Value; +20% Storage Cost * * * * * © © « 223 A-88 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; Westinghouse PWR- No Plutonium Value; ~20%Z Storage Cost * * * * * © « « 224 A-89 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 Base, +20% Uranium Costs* * * * * * ss ee fe et es 225 136 Figure Title Page A-90 Optimal Selection Rule; +304 Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; Base Costs* * * * * © © * © * # * « » 226 A-91 Optimal Selection Rule; +30% Pessimistic Reprocessing Scenario; General Electric BWR/6 No Plutonium Value; +20% Uranium Cost * * * * * *© © © © « 227 137 CaDUVHOSIG Sal TEWNyssv Tanda LINXdS dO WadWNn UMd ) esnoysZut3zsemM 79 "Wa "9 "9 79 "9 49 79 "9 "9 "9 99 99 "9 "9 "9 79 "9 7 "9 79 79 "9 esz |I9 Izt WIE? |ly9 8: Hing) S1s0) S1s0) Lor |zs|8s |7sP_ |16| a8ei0ig a8ei0ig st fotzeusess 94 trelr) [99 9 z $6146] | ry €z{o8 yl (6 (6 LAA ZO7~- ZO7~- CHONVWAG 9 |9T BuTssedoaday A €6] | ‘e8ez03g ‘e8ez03g Pz v8} "9K 76| + rr ) A ee 9K [zt ZT SALT@NASSY OF Ih Ta L | |) OOD |z6 "9 9t ¢ Id Id 06/68] y%OZ+ y%OZ+ | QNVWad otT3stut3zdo 68|ts 79 g1 s |Z |Z Trt ‘wNTUeIN ‘wNTUeIN 49 let THNA 8 dO i AAA 69 v9 T 28/98] Uo | et dvaA Cees ao INAS 65 [6S eseg | YOZ- YOZ- |9” 9 AAA Se MA 40 fartny ALE |9¥\94 ‘NMS ‘NMS ZEeCeaa24 LT veles] AK WAGWNN “A LL LL LUT meee wotj.eTss %OZ- %OZ- SY At Ccesewaa PA [6s CA CK r 6s OP setsaaas A zB | 1) [ EN AK tT) Syjoz ‘AMS ‘AMS ON Ba spt TS] AK KY rr A KH TZ G OT A a Ok OF ZOT+ ZOT+ Tewtidg | Le 0 62/82] wa2 po Le ra |o ‘aseg ‘aseg A LI Jo “[-y LZ | 9 G6 6 76 2 T6 06 es| 68 28] 98] ce} ce} "8; G8 z8 Te 08 64 BL iL 9 exanBtTy 5 & & oy E 3 = 138 GaDaUVHOSIC SAIIENASSV Tand LNAdS dO WasWNN UMd esnoySutTzsemM esnoySutTzsemM Ls Ls "9 "9 79 79 "9 "9 = = 29 29 z z "9 "9 79 79 79 79 79 79 "9 "9 s s 79 79 "9 "9 79 79 79 79 79} 79} 79 79 | | || || |} |} | | Ii Ii €S7I7S €S7I7S Sy Sy ZT} ZT} WEP WEP 9 9 £7 £7 79 79 79 79 7Ssr 7Ssr |16| |16| | | fofaeueos fofaeueos HESS HESS BS] BS] 94 94 Fe Fe "9 "9 Yb Yb 9DIEL 9DIEL PPT PPT S6/46| S6/46| c| c| Dewees Dewees 7 7 | | CaQNVWAC { { BurTsseooidsey BurTsseooidsey 79 79 O8| O8| AOA AOA 9t(0¢ 9t(0¢ od od €6| €6| sasaaAAaeecececesesesaa sasaaAAaeecececesesesaa 78} 78} PF PF 76| 76| op op Xx Xx PP PP {Zt {Zt SAITIGNASSV BB BB 3 3 £ £ Ted Ted A A 8 8 3500 3500 76168 76168 tT] tT] 1ér 1ér S S 06/68| 06/68| Ae Ae x x QNVWad oTAstwrTj3do oTAstwrTj3do ST ST CAIDAS: CAIDAS: "9h "9h wnfueay wnfueay At At ITS ITS HAS HAS 79 79 LT] LT] OF OF 88 88 TaOd | | dO Pett Pett "| "| S916S S916S 79 79 28/98] 28/98] T T A A Vas ZOc+ ZOc+ eseg eseg || || 7 7 INddS AON AON 6S 6S | | ea ea weeeeeaeaaa weeeeeaeaaa 971 971 9” 9” ssi ssi fatny fatny dO AAT AAT 97197) 97197) 9% 9% 78lE8| 78lE8| WaeWON HN HN AA AA At At ZL ZL 41 41 AAA AAA AA AA de de AA AA uot}oeTes uot}oeTes 94 94 HK HK 6S1S7 6S1S7 esp esp KK KK 78 78 OT OT C C TS] TS] ease ease S77 S77 A A Oy Oy NA NA AO AO DE DE 1 1 nN nN KK KK A A TewTadg TewTadg 9Z|} 9Z|} TZ TZ C C ee ee A A 08 08 Le Le ML ML AAS. AAS. I I 4 4 tT tT 7 7 _ _ 62/82 62/82 Of} OF} OF} Of} LL LL | | SL SL ape ape { { ‘*7-V ‘*7-V O O LZ LZ YT YT eansTy eansTy 5 5 6 6 ee ee %6 %6 26 26 T6 T6 06 06 68 68 88 88 98 98 28 28 €8 €8 or) or) $8 $8 z8 z8 08 08 gl gl él él 9 9 Ld Ld | | | | ADUVHOSIG dO UvaA 139 CaSUVHOSICG SAI TENASSV Tand LINAdS dO WadWin YUMd YUMd | | }79 }79 esnoySZuTj4sey esnoySZuTj4sey “9 “9 aA aA "9 "9 "9 "9 79 79 99 99 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 "9 "9 "9 "9 79 79 "9 "9 "9 "9 79 79 v9 v9 9 9 99 99 79 79 fT fT ESz|ZS ESz|ZS 9 9 7 7 8; 8; 79 79 79 79 ey ey bre bre [esp [esp |L6| |L6| [8S [8S 8S 8S fofaeusssg fofaeusssg 94 94 | | pe pe fp fp 9 9 99] 99] et et $6/%76| $6/%76| Z Z E2108 E2108 Ba Ba rb rb |6 |6 PAA PAA CAGNVWAG mI mI BuTsseooadey BuTsseooadey |9T |9T pA pA €6| €6| tb tb | | | | LT LT 78] 78] 9 9 76] 76] S3SO09 S3SO09 OZ) OZ) LY LY 88} 88} mE mE TT TT SHIIGNASSV zt zt T T Ta Ta 1 1 P7 P7 8z 8z oseg oseg Zé] Zé] 06/68 06/68 g g | | (NVWad SY SY oTasturTjzdg oTasturTjzdg 68] T8| T8| 68] CS CS 9€ 9€ fonTeA fonTeA | | pel pel 79 79 LT LT 88 88 a a TANA 40 Sol Sol CW CW 8T 8T S S 48/98] 48/98] uNTUOINT, uNTUOINT, x. x. UVAA lL lL CAA CAA TA TA INAdS CECE CECE 65/97 65/97 tC tC 61T 61T 8 8 eseg eseg {22 {22 61 61 Se] Se] 40 fer[ny fer[ny CA CA ov ov ET ET AAA AAA DE DE velCs| velCs| | | ON ON WAGWAN nN nN Feed Feed Fes Fes A A 9¥[ 9¥[ 94 94 uotjoeTes uotjoeTes PO PO PA PA A A 6S|s¥ 6S|s¥ 6s[ 6s[ yHEeEeest=aA yHEeEeest=aA —paa-a —paa-a Ze Ze De De YF YF or) or) Oh Oh C7 C7 A A TS] TS] A A Oe Oe A A OA OA A A 2 2 | | FA FA awa- awa- 4 4 9z7| 9z7| tcp" tcp" G G A A Temtjdg Temtjdg A A OF OF 1 1 KS KS NL NL Le Le LY LY ee ee 7 7 O| O| 62/82] 62/82] [7 [7 [7 [7 | | 7 7 O O | | Le Le ‘“¢E-V ‘“¢E-V O O LZ LZ | | 96 96 C6 C6 €6 €6 "6 "6 Z6 Z6 06 06 16 16 89 89 98] 98] LB} LB} cs) cs) 8 8 28 28 98 98 xan3Ty xan3Ty 08 08 T8 T8 62 62 gL gL 5 5 LL\ LL\ S S fas fas S S & & & & a a | | 140 GaSaVHOSIG SAL TENASsSV Taha INHdS dO WadWiin YUMd | | |” |” | | Pa | | ie ie esnoysutqsey OTS OTS 79 79 09 09 79 79 99 99 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 "9 "9 79 79 9 9 79 79 | | || || f f Il Il cL} cL} ES ES 8; 8; Cy Cy 79 79 ¥9 ¥9 7s 7s 2S} 2S} |16| |16| PP PP 8S} 8S} fotzeusecsg eb eb 94 94 99 99 mT mT S616! S616! ¢ ¢ | | rr rr EZ} EZ} a a 16 16 GaQNVNAd | | raters) raters) 08 08 Buytsssvoidey ysop 9 9 9t}oz] 9t}oz] €6| €6| dp dp rr rr 79 79 78 78 76] 76] Xe Xe uNTurIQ DP DP 88126 88126 mE mE Z118z Z118z SHI zr zr Ta Ta dO dO 9 9 TENASSVY 06/68} 06/68} gs gs | | ONVWAd | | ¥OZ+ ofastuytjdo 68] 68] CAA CAA eer eer T T 79 79 T8199 T8199 LT LT 79 79 4 4 88 88 Ta0d SONTeA dO 87 87 - - 28} 28} | | UVAA | | Lo Lo INdadS QA QA Ao Ao AA AA 6S] 6S] eseg T T 9T 9T 6T 6T S S 98| 98| wWNFUOANTY, ra ra FSFE FSFE 9% 9% [97 [97 SS] SS] dO fatny ANH ANH 97 97 97 97 LAA LAA 78) 78) | | WaaWON 4) 4) ALA ALA 9”[ 9”[ E8| E8| uotTAdeTes ON 7 7 OST OST AA AA 6S/S7 6S/S7 AA AA OH OH A A Ze Ze nA nA MN MN Yt Yt Saws Saws Kh) Kh) A A esa esa Oe Oe OH OH A A oT oT T8| T8| A A A A ZK ZK | | EEL EEL TZ TZ 97] 97] ¢ ¢ OK OK Tempt3dQo KL KL Sd) Sd) A A OF OF eK eK Oe Oe wl wl Fe Fe Ne Ne LL LL O| O| 62/82) 62/82) LO LO p77 p77 O O a a | | lo lo ‘y-Vy 7 7 O O LZ LZ 9 9 76 76 26 26 16 16 06 06 68 68 381 381 98) 98) 78 78 €8 €8 $8 $8 san3tTy 08 08 T8 T8 8 8 64 64 9 9 LL| LL| | | | | o o 2 2 5 5 a a Ss Ss 141 CHSUVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Tana INddS dO aan WMd | | BsnoysutT 479 79 79 99 79 79 79 79 79 79 99 79 73 "9 79 79 "9 "9 99 9 79 79 I || | A [| ESZ 79 Het} 9 8; €? 79 79 sem S 8S] ZS] ¢sp |16| Qa HOeCestsa-2 fotzeusss 94 ae bd 99 S6\46| ST 716 | earaes PIT EZ] GaQNVWAG 79 BuTsseooidey 3809 08} [OT] €6| PAIL 78 "9K 1 26| O¢| wNTuUeIQ sd \88 EY CT SHITENASSV et KK Te 1 | Zé} 9K gz{sz 06) QNVWad oOTAsTuT3dO YOZ- 9K 68] 68| | T8159 Ti lA 9 8B OY THNd fenTeA 4 dO ea WeCeeeaesaaa2 8T LHL L8/98| TIAL | | UVaA EZEeeeeseaeaa 7 INadS sseg 6S] 8T 61 ¢ wNTUuO Eeewst=a CAAA 99 97]97 Se dO Satny KELL INT, WEeeCewsewaz 78leB] | WAgWNN AA AT Eee OT 9H] 9% AAI A uofTIOeTeSg ON 6S} A ON Ze nt rararard Sy A ON A Ts] sawaa A sop OK A Yr KA IY I9z A oA T@ KK. Tewrjadg A 1 Oe OF Oe EK < | Ft O| 62/82) Te LE pL O| a A °¢-y O LZ 96 $6 6 6 T6 4 06 68 88] 8] 48) ean3Ty ¢s; 78} $8 28 T8 08 SL 64 9 iL | | S y F ™ 8 142 CHSUVHOSIC SAI TIMNASSV TaNd IN2dS dO WadWiin WMd esnoySutjsem 9 oO 79 "9 19 9 99 79 79 9 "9 79 79 #9 79 "9 79 79 79 79 79 |] |i b Ilee fet Aree 8; Hs 49 79 z6|8s lp |246| TS foTaeuaos 94 eye eye 199 rm Rr eer saaaaas S6|%76| z | | q €Z{08 el 79 CHQNVWAC 6/91 79 Butsseosoridey 3809 €6| | | aa 78) PEA Oc|er 76| el e8e102S 88] "9 Zt| SHITENASSVY gi Ta FA 26] On| cS 06/68) FU QNVWAd YOZ+ oTastmp 68 72 79 T w= ITS 79 [ZT 88 Tahd FA SenTeA | dO Lal i) ado $9} OX. "9 T 28) CA UVaA INAdS AAA 6S AAA 6S aeseg 98| wnNTUuOCINT_d La j9y ZALES {¢ gT 61 9 IAP tanned Ss dO faTny [94] 9% v8\Es| WaaWnn ZAA A ADKELPIL LO BeeswawaraA AP Oy] meee K uotRoeTeS ON > i PON — ES|cy 6S AAG ALA A AK AIA EEE PPP ZB CA OK cop Ase AO TS) A | aA oz] 9¢ Ke aa Tewt3dQ OF a KA SW A 1 ol 62/82 IE LO Lo ITe EL [7 a a O| O| PI PTs | *gQ-V O LZ |] 8 6 €6 Z6 68 88} 8 98] 8) eaANsTy €8 78 $8 28 T8 08 64 QL LL 9L| | E; as = & » og e 8 | | 143 CHOUVHOSIC Sal TEnaSssv TaNd INHdS dO WadWNN UMd UMd esnoysuTjsem esnoysuTjsem ESC17S ESC17S 9 9 él él "9 "9 |¢s |¢s {8S {8S foTreuacs foTreuacs | | 9I}EL 9I}EL GHQNVNAC GHQNVNAC [08 [08 sutssasvoidey sutssasvoidey 3809 3809 | | 78188 78188 a8e101g a8e101g SHI SHI | | TENASSVY TENASSVY 26168 26168 QNVWAd QNVWAd ¥OZ- ¥OZ- stastwutydo stastwutydo |T8 |T8 TaNd TaNd fenTeA fenTeA dO dO | | S9 S9 £8} £8} UVaA INAdS INAdS 16S 16S 98| 98| aseg aseg wNTUOANTY wNTUOANTY | | 97194 97194 S8| S8| JO JO fa[ny fa[ny 781€8| 781€8| WaGWNN WaGWNN lov lov uotzoeTes uotzoeTes ON ON | | 6S1 6S1 ze ze cy cy T8 T8 1 1 9z] 9z] [TewFidg [TewFidg 6L) 6L) O| O| O| O| 82 82 ‘*/-Vy ‘*/-Vy O O ean3tTy ean3tTy ADUVHOSIC dO UVaA 144 UMd Ca5SNVHOSIG SAI TENASSV Tanda INGdS dO WaaWNn XOOTTM 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 9 pue OLE OLE OT 89 GT 89 Te 89 89 89 89 r yoooqeg | | €S/8S €S/8S |46| 94 foTazeuscg 199 199 S6|%6| | | 7Z| 7Z| CHQNVWAC CHQNVWAC T8 T8 €6| ButTssodo0adsy |S8 |S8 76 | | 68] 68] SHITENASSV SHITENASSV T@ T@ €6] €6] 06] 06] GNVWad GNVWad 06/TS 06/TS 68 68 $}S0) oTAstTmTqdO TaNd TaNd dO dO oseg 199 199 £8) £8) UVaA UVaA | | INAdS INAdS 091947 091947 98] 98] sg faTny eseg S8! S8! | | dO dO 97) 97) 781€8| 781€8| WHaWNN WHaWNN ZY ZY 16S 16S uortqoeTes 78! 78! | | 97197 97197 TS TS | | Teurado O O 64/8 0 0 "g-V eansTa ADUVHOSIG dO UVAA 145 UMd Be Be Bg Bg . . a a Ba Ba 5% 5% 5 5 a a RA RA QO QO * * BuyAsesuT3uyq osf osf 08 08 O8}] O8}] os os 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 og] og] 08 08 08 08 08 08 Oe Oe 0g 0g og og 08 08 08 08 os os ]| ]| || || || || || || || || || || || || 864] 864] os os 8 8 cz cz ZT ZT ¢ ¢ O€ O€ 6z 6z 08 08 08 zs zs 08 08 ®y ®y uotysnquoy Par Par [4SP [4SP £5|€9}zZ £5|€9}zZ |L6| |L6| cor cor ar ar 964 964 ar ar cee cee Ob Ob S6| S6| | | fotaeusssg rrr) rrr) ab) ab) of of 08] 08] 476! 476! er er GHaNVWAC oe oe 28 28 a a L L €6| €6| | | ld ld os os 26] 26] [zt] [zt] Z6| Z6| Pell Pell Butssssvo0iday 96 96 08 08 SAITANASSV 8} 8} 8 8 Ta Ta |TOT| |TOT| 08 08 kK kK 12] 12] 06/68/ 06/68/ (NvWad (NvWad 08 08 26] 26] GT GT $180) T T T] T] 4o4e 4o4e 88 88 08 08 8] 8] 88 88 ACA ACA THOd ofastwr4zdg dO dO LAAT LAAT [tz [tz WEeeeeeeseasaaa WEeeeeeeseasaaa oseg TZ TZ 28/98| 28/98| | | Vas L- L- INAdS s9}os s9}os G9 G9 AA AA ZEeAeeesea2424k: ZEeAeeesea2424k: ZAM ZAM 0S 0S ALAA ALAA Sel Sel | | oseg dO AT AT os} os} ose ose AMAA AMAA veles| veles| WAEWNN LAL LAL A A AeA! AeA! AALA AALA Zhe Zhe A) A) Ts/¥79 Ts/¥79 is| is| aL aL foTny f f 1 1 Tr Tr Ae. Ae. A A Tt Tt AK AK ze ze | | fT fT Cow Cow uotj.eTas os}sz] os}sz] osf osf fOr fOr Ee Ee Ts! Ts! Tf Tf AS AS Vs Vs XK XK 8z 8z KIEL KIEL KO KO og og 4 4 A A AL AL LL LL AK AK 1K 1K 4} 4} o o Ez[ Ez[ | | | | 7 7 | | TT TT ~Tewr3dQ Ld Ld eZ] eZ] of] of] | | o o ZZ ZZ 96 96 $6 $6 £6 £6 76 76 06 06 Te] Te] es| es| 6a] 6a] 98 98 L8 L8 €8 €8 "| "| Ss Ss z8 z8 T8 T8 08 08 gL gL 61 61 of) of) iL iL °*6-V 5 5 * * v v E E sean3sty 3 3 un un 146 g/UMG bd Fg a3 oe B ee 4 Ba e ae Pd 2 WA}9aeTY | esthestt caT|foe estos EST Let ea [a e8T est est Est eer EST Esl €8T CSTHOTL ESTIL9 ESTHIT EsT egtiest C8Thest os ZVOUCE ST 87 Ter9ueH Ke |L6| + bo ULV meBSAsSsaAaAeeeCeeesesesa A TS9T 94 fofaeuscsg sot S6}¥76| BST eet ¢ QHQNVWAG | A 907 ep OT €6| FO LZ BuTssevoiday AA STZSzZ6ETITETIETCOITESTIOTULZTEzTsyT/9TT ISe ee 76] rr tt s3so9 9€ SHITENASSV 16 T4 esi [0z 9€ 06/68] | QNVWad QNVWad unturig il estp TE LTIET otastutado + €8 LT 8B THOA 1 aes 40 40 ALAND 4 oot 707+ 28] | UVdA | Lo INAdS EST 98] eseg ‘eseg ALLA ZA St Cceeceasaaas Ss] dO Vell “LT AA A vs]Es| fetny WAGWAN ECty AIEEE A tO A CAAA Cessa2 Lye (A cv uotzoeTes A Or A ze IEE NY OY OY oTIY Ts] Tee AK AA NH OB 29{ 19 OT Oe OF p44 IEE De Tewr3dQ as Of 62/82] | [7 LE Lo oO TY | O ZZ ‘OT-V $6 E6 %6 Te] e381 6] 98] 78 es, 781 C8 Z8 Tt? 08 64 BZ 9Z} lL eansty gs * 0 E & ™ 147 9/AMP ra ra BE BE Bg Bg BO BO Q Q Sa Sa ra ra 5 5 By By n n A A a a i i i i | WFAOaTY feet feet EBT EBT €8t €8t €8T €8T CST CST €8T €8T eet eet at at est est €8T €8T €8T €8T €8T €8T est est Est Est est est €8T €8T €8t €8t €8t €8t €8T €8T €8T €8T feet feet ZVOTEETIZVTIS9TIBSTIO0Z ZVOTEETIZVTIS9TIBSTIO0Z jos jos |e St St [oz [oz [29 [29 lest lest HOTT HOTT WEST WEST Heel Heel Sy Sy Tezsuey FP FP ketIr ketIr |26| |26| | | mesCeestes mesCeestes 94 94 rierrl rierrl foTazeuacs 89K 89K S6/%76| S6/%76| ret ret Clee Clee ee ee QHQNVAAC arr arr a a €6| €6| BuTsseooiday Fb Fb |8TZ|SZZ6E7 |8TZ|SZZ6E7 [ssi [ssi t9 t9 26| 26| $}Sso09 Lb Lb est est = = SAITENASSVY | | Te Te LO LO be be oN oN oseg 06 06 62 62 06/68| 06/68| Ee, Ee, GNVNad J J TEZIE TEZIE |£6 |£6 LHS LHS oT|ystwijadg fan[eA LCOTIESTISEIKCTIEZTTISVLI9TIZ9 LCOTIESTISEIKCTIEZTTISVLI9TIZ9 EST EST O€ O€ BB BB THNa a a dO CS CS AA AA ZCCeeseeaaeaa-a ZCCeeseeaaeaa-a T T 86 86 49} 49} 48] 48] unTuoj{ntg a a Vas LL LL LINdadS ut ut (est (est 98/ 98/ AA AA | | L— L— eseg Pt Pt AA AA ssi ssi OA OA 40 BLT BLT A A vslEs| vslEs| fatny Ay Ay ON WHaWnN Cosa Cosa (A (A mMeewswa.s mMeewswa.s ct ct ty ty OH OH KK) KK) Pa Pa LH LH APTLY APTLY CAA. CAA. Lt Lt A A “| “| uotTzoOeTes |sytp |sytp OL OL ESB ESB FT FT 77 77 Ze Ze 9T 9T 4 4 BS BS ee ee 4° 4° T8| T8| OA OA YE YE A A ra ra 19 19 | | i i AS AS OF OF a a ll ll | | Ll) Ll) i i Teut3dQ 7 7 0 0 62/82] 62/82] J J | | | | pea pea | | ra ra wa wa al al O| O| a4 a4 7 7 O O ZZ ZZ ‘“TT-V | | 5 5 G6 G6 €6 €6 76 76 Te] Te] 06 06 68 68 88 88 98] 98] £8 £8 £8 £8 C8 C8 Z8 Z8 "8| "8| T8 T8 Og Og SL SL 62 62 9 9 Le Le xansTy ox ox ted ted F F w w o o . . e e & & 148 Q9/AMZ Q9/AMZ QH5aYVHOSIG SAL TENASSV Tanda LNAdS 10 YHeWiIN PLA}ZOSOTY PLA}ZOSOTY est est est est est est 9¢ 9¢ £9 £9 [esl9ueyH [esl9ueyH r T T |46| 96 fofaeueds fofaeueds S6/76/| CHQNVWHO CHQNVWHO 3809 3809 BL ¢ €6] suTssaoorday suTssaoorday STICISTC| STICISTC| (SGT €9 €9 76] UNTuUeAIQ UNTuUeAIQ S7 S7 SATTGNASSV SATTGNASSV T& | | GEC GEC GZ GZ 06) QNVWAC QNVWAC YOZ+ YOZ+ 68 TECIETZISITIESTIOTIIZZIETTISHTI9TT/ TECIETZISITIESTIOTIIZZIETTISHTI9TT/ oTastutiadg oTastutiadg feNTeA feNTeA Tana Tana dO dO £8) UVHA UVHA INddS INddS 98) wWNTUOC wWNTUOC aseg aseg S8) dO dO ANT, ANT, fatny fatny 78/€8)] UWHaWnNn UWHaWnNn ON ON uotjoeTes uotjoeTes cs T8|] 249 249 Of | | Teutado Teutado 62) 0 0 8 Io Io 0 Ll “ZI-V ean3sTy AHDUVHOSIG dO YVAA 149 CaSaUVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Tanda INdadS dO WaeWiNn UMd $380) ) ) easnoyZuTisem “9 49 "9 9 "9 79 49 "9 "9 79 79 49 "9 "9 "3 79 79 79 "9 "9 79 - ese107s 8Z 7 OT Sy Pa |09|29 {09 |L6| ZOZ- 79 foTzaeusss eee € 96 | | Baas "9 92] zt[oz S6| ‘asei0js Ff 78 2 va 76] Ga0NVWAC C4 |z6 9 [ez BuTssadoaday €6) | keh | Fr Pp) ZO7T+ T L6|TOW9OT|ZoT "9 ce I 76) An he | 79 SAITENASSVY 2 ctl TG “uNTuern | i) a rt zv{ 06/68| (NVWad Lp 7 oTastTuTAdO "79 TEE Z | | 79 ZOZ- €6| L|¥ 8 TT 8h Taha dO eA a AAA Sz 79 L 28/98] uVvaA 2 “wnfFuern {| Zo LINadS {89 AA) Ae a YCoT+ 4} | La 2 AULT Estes es S8 dO faeTny ALT AM Zz es| A ZozZ+ 78/ WaaWNN PAA CAA les ANAT AA At cs es} A uotzoeTes SL | ‘nMS LA r TT 79 89) OT OP rrr] CA ATT EE 7 A 78 Tr MK ZS OP {ZS KH rb ZOT- T8; OK | HA NY ei] OE] O¢ A Sl Tewmpadg 08 KI) S74 a “NMS - Oe — i 62) O| Ia Lo ILE Ors ZOZ+ 82 O| | ‘“ET-V O LZ | “eseg 5 $ £6 76 T6 26 06 88 81 99 £8 Ee y3| z8 es] Ts 08 gl 6L LL 9 eansTy | & a o & ™ 150 CHOUVHOSIG Sal TEhASsv TaNd INddS dO WagWnn UMd esnoysutisay 7 OT 82109 I I | 09 |46| |46| | % £9} foyzeuscs 96 96 t cl 92} S6/176| S6/176| | 78 02 | CHCNVWAC BC ButTssasdoidey 26] €6| €6| 26 76} 76} $3S09 92 |TOTIFOTIZoT SHITENASSVY T& T& aeseg 06/68 06/68 GNVNAd GNVNAd ITFasTwMTAdO tan[TeA £6] TaNd fO fO cz £8/98| £8/98| WNTuCINT_d UVvaA 189 INAdS YCT+ | ES]ES S8 S8 40 fatTny 78/€8| 78/€8| ON WHidWNN JES woTIoeTeS | 8917S 78 78 TS TS | OF] TempzidQ 0} O JO “HT-V eaAn3TY AOUVHOSIG dO UVaA 151 CHDUVHOSICG SalTENASsvV Tand INddS dO WaaWNNn WMd | esnoysutysey LILI "9 79 mi 79 79 79 "9 2 49 "3 "3 79 79 79 79 19 79 79 79 279 | 8ZL OT 87 | 109/29 (opr eCesaaawaa 46; #9 foTzieussg 94 J9Z TAK cL S6 | rere ON 781/26 nA (aqNVWad GT qs09 BuTssaedoridey A 79 €T) €6| | L6{TOROOT] mtr 6¢ 76} 7} 7} umTueIN he SHITANASSVY LeaBaas LE we) T& 79 c7| 06/68} GNVWad GNVWad ¥O0zZ+ oTastwmTadg ZONES TE ” _ 2 | 09| €€ AG 88 TaNd fenTeA | | dO dO AAA SZ| wo 4 TT 28 2 uvar uvar 4 [AAA ECccestsaaa LNadS ZA 89 AA xYoT+ uUMTuOINTY, AL JES a s8 dO faTny [ESTES AAA WadWnNn FEeestaw rey AA KK wotyzoseTes MA ON | LA CA Sessa 89} tr Vf 7 a ILL A A 7g | ZS10E |8T v€ A ACA ON A T8} aA EAE AA lO€ Tewtadg ns O8 A Se | i — i 1 i O 62 LO | cA 01] LY 0 :C{[-V 86 C6 76 £6 26 06 T6 68 a8] 98 18 €8 a c8 T8 08 Sl 64 il 9 eAansty re . v 152 GaSuUVHOSIG SAL TENASSV Tand INddS dO WadWIN UMd esnoyZurysomM 8L % OT OT 87 87 9 {09 109 |L6| |L6| 79 {29 foTzeusss 96 96 | 9L} "9 cL cL S6| S6| 78 79 O¢ O¢ 46) 46) CHQ0NVWAC |26 79 3809 ButTssadoraday ET] ET] cT cT €6) €6) | £6 99 62 62 % % 26|] 26|] unTueIn |TON9IOT 79 ILE ILE SAITENaASSV TG TG "9 cv| cv| 06/68 06/68 CNVWad otastutqdo vOoZ7- O E6 ZO 79 2 2 Tad fenT[eA dO ISZ £8} £8} | UVvVaA INAdS B9}ES 98| 98| YGT+ WNTFuoRINT, S8| S8| | fSatny 40 ES} 78/8) 78/8) WadWON ES]}89 uotqAoeTes ON cE cE | cS; TS TS OE Tewr3do | O 62) 62) | 82 82 O :9T-V 0 eansT ADUVHOSIG dO avaAs 4 153 CaSaVHOSIG SAI TEINASSV Tanda INAdS dO WadWiiN UMd —- esnoyZutjsem "9 49 "9 "9 "9 79 "9 "9 49 79 79 79 99 79 79 2 = 79 979 ||} 7 84 9 8; UL PPI j09 |09 |46| jL9 99 fotzeuacsg € 94 | Baaa 94 yet [zt| Pe S6/4%6| |¥8 19 att ON Oz! GaQNVWaAd | FA BuTssedoidey 3809 26} 8c €6 Tr L6 19 ez OL z6| a3€103S | |LOT/9OTIZOTIE6 4 SHITENASSV 79 Zt! T4 Or 1 9 9¢ 06|/68/ A ed 9 9 |) QNvWad oTastwp3do ¥O07+ 09 Te TT L | 7 fe es|tt L TA 88 TaNd SenTeA | dO NOT SZ} "9 28/98] UVaA Pt £eecesta LNAdS oa 89 yoT+ 4 179 wNTUOINTY, | LTA ESlESIES TT a Sei 40 fetny A ALES €S ZECeeaa-A vsles| WHaWNN PA ZCHeceas ZL AL A AA A es] uotqoetes ON | ——_ Pr LT UA 89} 49 y 4 Ot HEP ze | Tt tk ZS] |IstTr |IstTr 7€ Ts] LAC OY OK A [275 eae) AK A | Of] O€ Tewt3dg A DT OF Gara OL b LL 62182] 0] LAL LO 7 [7 0} ‘/[-y 0 LZ 96 C6 6 76 26 te] 06 68 88] 98] CB} 78 es} $8 T8 08 6L Sl iL 8 9 ean3Ty iS C, C, & oy - z * 154 CaSaVHOSICG SAL TENASSV TaNd INddS dO WagWiin UMd esnoyZutjsem 8L 49 4 OT I I |46| |46| j09 | £9} € fotzeusos 94 94 92 cl $6) $6) 76| 76| 78 0c | CaQNVWAd CaQNVWAd 26}26 380) Butsssvoadey GC €6) €6) j9Z 26; 26; e3e109S [LOT] SAITENASSV SAITENASSV TG TG 9ONZOT! 06/68 06/68 QNvWad QNvWad oTastTutadg 4OZ- €6/S2 Tanda Tanda fen dO dO £8} £8} TeA UvaA 89 INddS INddS 98) 98) YoT+ wNTUOCINTY, | ESTES S8 S8 dO dO feTny 78/€8| 78/€8| | WadWnN WadWnN ES] uotjzoeTes ON 8917S 78 78 TS TS | OF] Temradg O| O JO ‘gT-V ean3Ty ADUVAOSIC dO uvas 155 Q/AMA Q/AMA CaDuVHOSIG SAI TENASSV Tanda INddS dO WaaWNn WZFAROSeTY WZFAROSeTY [Teseuey [Teseuey €S €S foTaeuacsg foTaeuacsg C6TYITICLE C6TYITICLE OT OT | | €€| €€| GaGNVWAC GaGNVWAC 79 79 sutsssd.oadey sutsssd.oadey 189 189 797|SL7}992 797|SL7}992 s3sop s3sop BT BT 9 9 SHI SHI T@ T@ |c6 |c6 TEWASSV TEWASSV 06) 06) (NVWad (NVWad untueig untueig 68 68 LT LT 9 9 ¢ ¢ oTastuTjdgQ oTastuTjdgQ £8 £8 |tt |tt 6% 6% TaNd TaNd |T |T dO dO T6TI9LT T6TI9LT Z Z 8T 8T £8/98| £8/98| 707+ 707+ UVaA INAdS INAdS {92 {92 x¥c{T+ x¥c{T+ ‘eseg ‘eseg eT eT S8| S8| JO JO 78)€8| 78)€8| PUT PUT SaTny SaTny WaaWnN WaaWnN uotAoeyTes uotAoeyTes TLOT TLOT 78 78 T8| T8| OF OF Tewtjadg Tewtjadg 62/8 62/8 “6 “6 [-V [-V ean8Ty ean8Ty AOUVHOSIG dO Vas 156 9/AMA TADUVHOSIG SAL'TENASSV TaNd INddS dO WadWnn VFAWOSTY C6S C6S EST ¢ €8T €8T I I Terzsuay IE€STI69TICG IE€STI69TICG |46| |46| 94 94 ‘foTizeuacs OT S6| S6| €€ 76 76 QHQNVWAC QHQNVWAC | | | LEZ LEZ oS €6) €6) Butssesooiday 89 26; 26; s1Ss0) | Z9 99 99 Z9 SdITENaSSV SdITENaSSV 621 T& T& oseg 92 LT 06) 06) QNVAad QNVAad 68 68 ofastuTjdg tan[eA, Tanda Tanda CIT6TIOZTICE CIT6TIOZTICE dO dO £8/98| £8/98| unNTuojntd UvVaA UvVaA INddS INddS xYoT+ S8) S8) dO dO HOYT HOYT 78/€8)| 78/€8)| feTny ON WaaWnNn WaaWnNn LVIoticetzz LVIoticetzz uot cB cB zoeTes TS TS Teut 10 10 62) 62) | | 82 82 0 0 ido "OZ-V eansTy ADUVHOSIG dO UvaA 157 O/AMA O/AMA GHOUVHOSIG SAI'TENASSV Tanda INAdS dO WadWNNn WFAWDETY WFAWDETY €8T €8T S6S S6S T [eieuey [eieuey |EST/69TN |EST/69TN fotieuesg fotieuesg C6 C6 1/9TZ 1/9TZ CHGNVWAG CHGNVWAG 4so9 4so9 surssasoiday surssasoiday TS¢} TS¢} wuntueIg wuntueIg 294 294 SHITENASSVY SHITENASSVY S27 S27 (NVWaAd (NVWaAd ~OZ+ ~OZ+ 9940S 9940S otastwTadg otastwTadg 497i 497i Taha Taha fenT[eA fenT[eA dO dO T6197 T6197 UVaA UVaA INAdS INAdS wNTUO wNTUO x~¢oT[+ x~¢oT[+ Tee Tee Hoy Hoy 40 40 INT, INT, 78; 78; fe[ny fe[ny Tite Tite WAGWNNN WAGWNNN €8| €8| ON ON 129 129 uotqo.eTesg uotqo.eTesg 78) 78) CET] CET] 18} 18} ZL} ZL} OF OF 0 0 [Tewrjdo [Tewrjdo 62) 62) 8 8 0 0 “T¢@-V eansta ADUNVHOSICG dO Vas 158 CHSUVHOSIG SAI TENASSV TaNd INddS AO WaaWNN UMd S}S0) esnoysut3sam a8e103$ 79 179 79 YO7- 179 "9 fotrazeusss | 79179 S6| S6| ‘ese101S 76 76 (HGNVWAC | | | Burssevoidey 79) €6) €6) YO7T+ 79 26) 26) ILOTIOZTIOTTISOT SAT T6 T6 SuMTUeIN TENaASSVY 06) 06) QNVWad QNVWad orastwutado €c €c 68 68 c c | | ZOZ- Tv Tv Tala dO dO S8 Te| Te| £8) £8) UvaaA ‘MNTUeIN |ZZ INddS 98) 98) yog+ 7 7 | 09109 S8| S8| dO feTny ZOT+ 78)/€8| 78)/€8| | WHanNN O09} uotzoeTes “MMS ZZ\6S 78 78 TS TS ZOZ- | 7E} ~ewrjadg ‘NMS 62/8 62/8 O| ZOT+ O “*zz-V ‘OSeE eansTy ADUVHOSIC dO UVaA 159 GHSUVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Tanda INddS dO WadWiNn UMd esnoyZuTjsem 79 79 99 99 8y 8y | | Pa Pa foTzeuacs TAA TAA 79 79 79 79 a a 76 76 Att Att wf) wf) QHQNVAAC ButTssovoidey KK KK tL tL 79 19h 19h z6| z6| $380) Pa Pa Saas Saas 2 2 LOT LOT 29 29 a a SAITENASSVY OTOCTIOTTISOT] OTOCTIOTTISOT] O02} O02} €¢ €¢ 1 1 Td Td a a oseg oseg met met 77 77 (AAS (AAS 06|68| 06|68| bo bo (NVWad (NVWad kl kl OTAsTuTAdQ Kr) Kr) ee ee San[eA San[eA Lo Lo 79 79 TY TY se se TaNd dO dO SB SB Zt Zt 9 9 28] 28] 4 4 uNTUCINTY, uNTUCINTY, dvds dvds | | LE LE ro ro LINdAdS jZZ jZZ AAnnnaeeaa-#s AAnnnaeeaa-#s vOE+ a a 98] 98] LY LY 4 4 9c] 9c] | | Ae Ae LLAMA LLAMA 0909 0909 BELT BELT Ke Ke Z| Z| ss| ss| dO foTNyY eT eT OL OL A A 4) 4) vefee| vefee| ON ON | | WHdWnN CcEesaa2s CcEesaa2s A A OT OT 09 09 BEeCeseawas BEeCeseawas TO TO AY AY 09) 09) 1 1 a)” a)” uoTIDeTes T_T T_T a a LT LT ZZ|6S ZZ|6S ze ze €eTj6e €eTj6e ESsa ESsa ON ON a a MD MD Att Att AL AL OO OO CA CA o€ o€ YE YE Tsl Tsl AK. AK. TT TT | | Ye Ye | | HF HF F F a. a. VE] VE] ve ve I I J J Teutadg og og 4 4 I I La La aA aA O| O| 62/eZ[ 62/eZ[ | | |“ |“ Lo Lo Zo Zo 2 2 SP SP La La O O | | |-7] |-7] LET LET "€Z-V O O ZZ ZZ €6 €6 S6 S6 76 76 26 26 T6 T6 06 06 88 88 68 98 98 £8 £8 ce ce €8 €8 78 78 78 78 08 08 62 62 82 82 Ld Ld 9 9 ean3TA ADUVHOSIG dO UvaA 160 GHSUVHOSIG SAL TANASSV Tanda INGdS dO YaaWNN UMd eSnoyBuT 79 79 79 Sy Sy sem 179 179 79 |£6| |£6| 179 179 99 fotTzeuscssg 964 964 | | S}so) 79)179 79)179 S6| S6| 76] 76] GHQNVWAC GHQNVWAC | | unyueIg ButTsssoo0adey 79) 79) €6) €6) 79 79 26} 26} |ZOTIOZTISTTISOT| |ZOTIOZTISTTISOT| ~oz- SATIGNASSV SATIGNASSV €7 €7 TG TG | | TZ TZ SE SE 06/68 06/68 QNvVWad QNvVWad ‘uNnTueIQ | | oTastTupjadg Ec Ec 62 TY TY ‘TaNd ‘TaNd dO dO S8}ZzZ S8}ZzZ ¥OZ7+ L8| L8| UvaA UvaA INddS INddS ~oE+ 98 98 | | feNTeA 09}09] 09}09] faTny dO dO 78}€8) 78}€8) WHaWAN WHaWAN WNTUOINT_, OF OF uoTtqAVeTes ZZ] ZZ] 28] 28] 6S 6S T8; T8; | | ON vE] vE] Teuptado O O O| O| £18 O O ‘h7Z-V einsty ADUVHOSIG dO UVaA 161 CaSUVHOSIQ SAI TERASsv TaNd INAdS dO WadWn UMd VBsnoyZurqsaem "9 "9 29 79 "9 79 79 79 79 49 n 79 79 E 79 49 79 49 79 "9 "9 || | 79 79 8; 179 mesa |L6| Io MOM mr foftazeusecssg 96 149 70 S6|46/ ee I79 9 AA | KAA Ga0NVWAC PP BuTsssoo0aday 3809) 79/79 mr KK €6) A aaaZ mrt 76| KK) 988102S lb IZOT|OZTI9TIKOT| re Kr) | SdHI'TGWNaSSV 79 Oz Ez | T6& NL | cL 74 06/68| mp A QNVWad QNVWad | 1 ¥O7+ oTastwtadg 99 2S rT Le LL. 79k TY 88 ‘Taha SaNTeA a dO dO $8 79 1? 28/98) uvaA | LAA PA | INAdS {Zz yog+ €e v€| wNTUO{NTY, | Va BZececeseeeses 09/09 OF y % Zz Ah S8 fatny dO AA ss |e {09 AAA 78; UaaWNN Pop Joo AAA At A ECesawes AT AZ AAS e€8| Ef 09 uorqoetTes ON | PA zzZ|6S V9F eT AA OA tT Er OP KK 78 KKK) O€ l6éc T8| tA Oe TL AK AK) | | NK P aa KS ve] ve OK Tewr3dQ Oe O8 XK KE KS O| 64/82) 4 Se K [7 ra O | LL *“C¢7Z-VW O LZ | 9 S6 £6 76 T6 26 06 68 ge] 98 £8) es} 781 z8 8 T8 08 64 BZ 9 iL eaNnsTy S i x F 3 ™ 162 CaSaVHOSIC SAL TENASsV Tad INAdS dO WaaWN UMd esnoysutysem 9079 79 79 "9 ” "9 "9 79 79 v9 79 29 79 79 79 79 99 49 79 79 79 8S; |79 9 |26| Parekh) | 79 79) foTaeusess 94 Paar 79 S6|76| PA 179 nA PEI GaaNVNAd | 79179 9 AK BuTssesdoaday 380) ae) €6| 19 76] A 93e103S LOTOZTISTTCOT] OK SAITENASSV Cv TG 444 SE, 9 99/8 06168) QNVWEC QNVWEC TE » oTastutado yozZ—- IZ ec KAN) 09 [TP 88 THOA PPT SenNTeA dO dO $8 79 LT £8198) 9 UVaA pA | LNAdS {ZZ ZA AAAAAL ZL AA LY 7 9 Zz yoe+ wWNTU0INT_ | |] AA, 09)09 109 AA SB dO fSetnmy AA 09 78;es| WHEWNN 109 AALS zy Aes 09 O A uotAoeTes | ON AA PAA A AA ZZ|6S LEAS 19 eT BOasBars Ze AOA Kk ane) CAA Of joc A T8; AAS, AOA 7 | | kL P VE} VE 4 4 AO O08 Teuwtadg EE A O}] 62) tet | SLE Lo SO Ke i O 82] LT | |] 0 ‘*97Z-V LZ 9 S6 6 Pe To) 28 68 88] 8] L8 78 €8} c8 z8 T8 08 62 SZ il 74 eANSTYy y E @ 163 Q9/UMZ GHDUVHOSIG Sd TENASsV TaNd INddS dO WaaWiin STAIeTY Sy Tezoeuaey |£6| 96 foTiaeuess $6} 76! ZB9C ZB9C QHONVWAC €6) BSutssevoidey 76] sjsoj SAITENASSVY TG T T 06/68 QNVWad QNVWad unztueagq oTastutTjdo ) ) Tanda JO JO £8| 707+ UvaA UvaA INddS 98; yOE+ ‘Seseg TST TST S8) dO 78)€8| feTNY WadWNN cL T T uoTIoeTes cl 78 78 96 T8 TeumFadg "/2-V aan3tg aDUVHOSIC dO UVAA 164 Q/UMA > > Br Br & & fs fs 3 3 ae ae O O E E * * : : = = Of | | feet feet [est [est 4}0eT_ cet cet €8T €8T est est Est Est est est EST EST €8T €8T €sT €sT E8T E8T €8T €8T EST EST C81 C81 €8T €8T €8T €8T €8T €8t €8t C6T C6T for for fest fest Sy Sy [ereueg [EZ [EZ KOPP KOPP PP PP |46| |46| TeST[ES TeST[ES 94 94 foTieussg $6) $6) TL TL PP PP Cees Cees QC QC yce9c yce9c 46} 46} (HQONVNAG eStr eStr OL OL ST ST £6) £6) Butssavoradey |e |e |OOT |OOT Bcpoz|LltOOL|ZLo Bcpoz|LltOOL|ZLo 76] 76] Ss}s09 aaa aaa LoL LoL SAITENASSV TT TT |" |" TE TE - - oseg 8cl 8cl 8 8 06/68} 06/68} ONVWAd ONVWAd tA tA BT BT oS? oS? 89 89 67/77 67/77 oTastutjadg fenTeA e8th e8th SIA SIA 88 88 ‘THNd A A dO dO TS TS ~~ ~~ ce ce LcpoollLSI LcpoollLSI 28/98) 28/98) LAA LAA UVaA WnTuocINtTg | | LAA LAA LNadS EST EST 9T 9T ~oOE+ CAAA CAAA cL cL AA AA SB SB dO RSID. RSID. e e 78; 78; fetny ON WadWNn AEA AEA OT OT AMA AMA AA AA St St E8] E8] ZZ ZZ TOT. TOT. KK KK 4 4 BSlhct|/alololo BSlhct|/alololo QT QT uoTJoeTes A A Aas Aas 78} 78} MN MN RITE RITE cow cow Pees Pees KL KL Cow Cow TSTY TSTY T8} T8} A A 7 7 A A hE hE IE IE ZE ZE CC CC A A OF OF A A was was + + Tewradg | | 62/82) 62/82) | | J J sg sg LZ LZ ‘°g7-V 9 9 s6 s6 26 26 06 06 68 68 88] 88] £8 £8 S8 S8 ¥Q ¥Q €8 €8 c8 c8 T8 T8 08 08 SZ SZ 6L 6L LL LL 9 9 | | ean3stTy E E 2 2 3 3 & & E E 6 6 165 Q/AMA Q/AMA GADUVHOSIG SAL TENESsV Taha INddS dO WadWiin DEAWOSTY DEAWOSTY €8T est €8 est CSTR €8T €8T est €8t €8T est €8T esl EST EST Tessuey Tessuey TELTESTleet TELTESTleet foTzeuass foTzeuass GaQNVWAd GaQNVWAd 89Z|E87/967 89Z|E87/967 3809 3809 Butssosvoradey Butssosvoradey wnTueIQ wnTueIQ SHITHNASSV SHITHNASSV 0 0 (NVWad (NVWad YOZ+ YOZ+ ofastwuptado ofastwuptado Tanda Tanda SenTeA SenTeA dO dO £8|98)| £8|98)| UVaA INddS INddS wNTUOINTY wNTUOINTY yog+ yog+ S8| S8| JO JO 781es| 781es| faetTny faetTny WAdNNN WAdNNN ON ON uotjoetTes uotjoetTes ze ze T8 T8 Teufzadg Teufzadg *G6z7-VW *G6z7-VW eaN3Tyg eaN3Tyg aDUVAOSIG dO avaa 166 CHSUVHOSIC SAI TUKASSV TaNd INGdS dO WaaWNN UMd UMd esnoysutjsaemM esnoysutjsaemM EvVS1TS cL 79 9 6 ce G¢ O€ 99 vA 99 79 "9 SJSsop SJSsop 9 r r 42S |46| |46| a8e107Ig a8e107Ig [8S 8S foTieuess foTieuess 9@ 9@ | OIF 79 S6|%6| S6|%6| EL 79 Z%OZ- ‘aser103ISg ‘aser103ISg Z%OZ- GHQNVNAC GHQNVNAC OB Butsssooidsey Butsssooidsey 99 €6| €6| | vVBl6Z 99 26] 26] 79 SAITENASSV SAITENASSV T& T& | Z| 79 06) 06) ZozT+ ZozT+ QNVNAd QNVNAd DTAsTTeey DTAsTTeey ZS LS 68 68 | ‘umFueIN ‘umFueIN 87] ‘Tad ‘Tad 40 40 SE; £8) £8) YVaA eseg eseg INadS INadS VE 98 98 x~OZ- x~OZ- | VEL faTny faTny 40 40 EEITE ‘NMS ‘NMS 78)/€8| 78)/€8| WAdWNN WAdWNN uotTjoeTes uotTjoeTes ZOZ- ZOZ- Oe 78 78 |O ‘NMS ‘NMS T8 T8 | Temradg Temradg O ZOT+ ZOT+ 6L 6L ‘aseg ‘aseg ‘oOE-Vy ‘oOE-Vy ean3tTy ean3tTy ASUVAOSIG dO UvaAs 167 CHSUVHOSIG SdITENASsV Tanda LNAdS dO WadWnn YMd esnoysutjsem esnoysutjsem €7S17G €7S17G 9 et 79 Sy Of ee Y G2 6 79 49 79 49 79 |2eS |£6| 18S 18S 8S foyAzaeusss foyAzaeusss 96 99 99 99 S6|76| |€2}08 |€2}08 GaQNVWAC BuTssavo0ridey BuTssavo0ridey €6| | | 78162 78162 26! SHITEWASSVY TG | | 480) 480) VLILS VLILS 06168 QNVWWad QNVWWad OfFAsTTeoy OfFAsTTeoy wNTUeIN wNTUeIN |8v |8v TaNd | | dO dO OE] OE] 28/98; YVaA osseg osseg ZO~+ ZO~+ INAdS vE vE | | VE; VE; S8) fatny fatny 40 eE|TE eE|TE 78; WiGWNN €8| uotqAoeTes uotqAoeTes | | oz] oz] ze TS O| O| Tewradg Tewradg O| O| Oo] Oo] o o ‘*TE-y ‘*TE-y eanstTy eanstTy ADUVHOSIG dO UvaA 168 CaSUVHOSIC SAI TaWNaSsv Tana INadS dO WadWNNn WMd esnoy3utTjsemM 9 "9 29 "9 79 "9 "9 79 79 79 "9 79 nm 79 79 "9 79 79 "9 79 79 79 fa | || Ii || |i {I {I [I f evs 9 6 fr 0€ [sz Hy [lee yg 79 49 49 49 Sy jp Err) zs |16| jes 8S fotzeuacs 94 | 99|e€z wee t{é T S6|%6| ery Baas Hea G4HQNVWAC log ButTssoooidey oT] €6] Ly | Tr ye 89 9€1 ea 4 z6| $350) aA | lez wa SHITENASSVY STL | Ta I | A oseg vZ/ SEE ET L A 06/68] | (NVWad (NVWad oTAST[eey {LS zs A | fenTeA sy vy 88 Tanda dO dO FESPPEEE EE — [oe Iz|_ [STE~,7 28/98] CAAA L wnpUucIN{Tg YVvaA YVvaA | eseg INadS lve + [ LAAN ZEeeea-a veloc] 7€ ssi SeTny JO OK TIA 6€ ve/Es] oN WadWN PAY LAT AA t’elLaatrtrel AAA LZ uot tefoz] KK TAA LA p7 AANA zoeTes Zeal Ne HW At AK TS] A A Tr OT of A KR EK KE Teutiado oT OF A oan Fe I EEL LL a GZ] 07 LO ZT O]7 "TE-V Z 0 | ee 9 $6 £6 96 T6 Z6 06 [oe 88 18 €8 78 $8 T8 PaNnsT 08 ey 6L 9 LL a ADSUVAODSIG dO UvaA 169 GHSaUVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Tand LNAdS dO WaaWN YUMd esnoy8utjsemM €EVCICS 79 9 ZL ¢ £6 18S 8S foTAeuecs | 99JEZL G6|76| | CHQNVWAC 08) BuTssao.0iday 3809 €6| 78 26] wNTuUeIQ [62 SHITENASSVY TG | VZILS 06) GNVWaAd oTASTTeey ~OZ+ 68 BY Tad fenTeA dO JIE 28/98} YVaA eseg IVE LINadS | wNTuUo VETOE S8) faTny dO INT, 78) WaaWnn ITE €8 uotTjOeTeS ON | | OZ} 78 T8 O| O TeurTIdQ | O} O ‘“EE-VW eANnBTy ADUVHOSIC dO UvaAAs 170 CADSUVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Tand INGdS dO YasWNN WMd {79 {79 Vsnoysutjzsem oEob>r oEob>r "9 "9 79 79 79 79 "9 "9 79 79 79 79 29 29 3 3 : : "3 "3 roto roto 79 79 v9 v9 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 | | | | || || || || || || || || || || || || 1 1 ES ES ct ct 9 9 8 8 se se & & 4% 4% #79 #79 79 79 99 99 79 79 49 49 | | 25/85] 25/85] |16| |16| 8S 8S fotTieusos ree ree 94 94 c c 9 9 99] 99] AO AO $6146] $6146] OK OK [or [or e208 e208 Tres Tres TOP TOP MOM MOM CHGNVWAC iw iw Burssa.o0iadey 3s09 KK KK Oe Oe €6| €6| | | iy iy tt tt 8/62 8/62 pir pir 76] 76] ee ee WNTURPIQ Ae Ae P| P| iit iit tte tte T T SHITENASSVY Ta Ta ede ede | | hK hK vz] vz] EEA EEA L L 06/68] 06/68] | | QNVWad QNVWad OTAsTTesy YOZ- i i LS LS {Ls {Ls ee ee [gy [gy gp gp 88 88 Tia fenTeA Fa Fa | | 40 40 Tot Tot 9€] 9€] [sTk [sTk 28} 28} I I UVaA CAA CAA ssegq INGdS AOA AOA ve ve IO IO 98| 98| WNTu0OINTg, | | att att | | ON ON vel vel tt tt ep ep faTny Se] Se] 40 OH OH ACA ACA pA pA ete ete CON CON sles] sles] WHOWNIN ress ress A A OP OP tL tL A A Ef Ef uoTADVeTes ke ke oN Oe Oe foc foc EET EET LA, LA, AEE AEE OO OO OY OY OK OK OCP OCP ze} ze} HW HW EE EE eat) eat) rr rr [0 [0 ON ON OF OF a a EOas EOas T8] T8] Oe Oe OT OT [TewmtqjdQ ToT0 ToT0 oe oe Ot Ot KS. KS. OF OF s s | | 62/82] 62/82] Lr Lr | | a a 0] 0] 1 1 LT LT ‘*HE-V 0 0 LZ LZ T T 96 96 C6 C6 76 76 €6 €6 Té Té Z6 Z6 06) 06) Te Te 98] 98] C8 C8 2ANBTy =| =| Z8 Z8 T8 T8 08 08 6L 6L QL QL iL iL 9 9 | | F F 8 8 w w y y 8 8 171 CHSUVHOSIC SAI TENXSSV Tad INddS dO WasWNNn UMd UMd esnoyZuTysem esnoyZuTysem €7S| 79 9 cl 7S) jes £6} 8S 8S foTzeuscss foTzeuscss 94 |99 79 S6/76| | E2108 79 6 GaQNVAAd 79 {9T 3809 3809 ButTssaooidey ButTssaooidey €6) | 78} 26) 98e109S 98e109S 62 SAITENASSVY T& I7L 06/68 ONVWHC | YOZ+ YOZ+ OTASTTeey OTASTTeey LS 187 Tanda | fenTeA 40 DE £8/98) UVaA INAdS eseg eseg VE WNTUOANT, WNTUOANT, [VE S8) fatTny fatTny | 40 GE; 781€8)| WaeWNN TE uotqoeTas uotqoeTas ON ON | Oc] zs O TS | TewrzdQ TewrzdQ O ‘*cE-y ‘*cE-y ean3Ty ean3Ty ADUVHOSIG dO avaAs 172 GaSUVHOSIC Sal TaWaSsV TaNd INddS dO WaeWN UMd {79 esnoy3utysemM miso 99 79 "9 "9 9 79 "9 79 99 79 "9 79 “9 79 79 v9 "9 79 79 79 = =|] | | {I |} E7S1ZS Hel |? Of [16 ee [Sz 79 77 79 [79 79 79 Sy |[cSPF |46| PPrPre 18S foTzeuscos SPA oP 94 | 99IEL rT ¢ S6\76| BEET 6 A Py CaQNVWaAC | ptleiarre 79 BuEssao.0adey 3509 08) AA £6 P 7B coe 26| a8P109S l6Z z9 SAITANASSV Ta | A Sas PL] EEE 6 06/68{ QNVAAG {ss 4OZ- atTAst[eey ZS ¢ | Bx) 84| Tr) Be Tifa SenTeA dO AVAL Py] 9E|vE Te ST 28/98] dvdr | aeseg LINAdS Da AA 9 uMTUuO | ett TTT ALLA vEleE weeceeweawaz Ssl fetTny 40 NT, 6 Kh AMY 78/E€s| WHeWNNn |TE ECcesesawaw Dn WEeeseewsawaz TE Bewwsa uofqoeTes esa-a A ON 1) LT [Oz] OP TP ON 02 ee ze Seaoww YT) TR) Ts; Of Oe EET Oe TewT3idg O ALE OF | Aa I O] 64/82] | La waa O TY LET ‘*g9¢-V JO LdT 9 88 6 76 76 T6 06 68 es] B) 7 $8 eansTy Z8 78) O08 T8 61 yi 9 il | : a F & 173 CHSUVHOSIG SAI TENASSV UMd Tand IN2dS dO WaaWiin XOOTIM Trees 39 89 89 a9 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 g9 89 89 89 go 89 89 89_ jj | | | 1 || || L fst pue ot Hz ec et {4 82 89 84 89 89 89 89 81 | yoooqeg €S/8¢ [esf |£6| ss 96 | Pere el) 99] 990 fotaeuaess S6\%6| 72 89 9 saaaas CACNVWAC | YY |T8 wp €T}9 €6| | — BSutssav0idey S8log 89 TT[ 26| EL Pll Py] SH1'1GNASSV 8 8 719 TE | KK LL wZ18¢ Tessa 06/68} A QNVWad [es s}so) e OTAST[esy jer vb Be Tind 4 | dO SL. eseg 9€/ce 9) 28/98| Aeeeceewas uVvaA [7 LA eer PAA INadS 4), Se | eseg AAA seforloe SEL SB aA JO KK OT KY Zhe AK on_ vel€e| foTny WaaWNN COSCO LE A114} OC ZL A AT IIE f tT bz “ AAA fT uotzIeTes ZAKS ON Oo7f OE Ze YX Tt TF i fo OA Yt) Ur T8| OT a 7 AKA O OT To A YL OF XY) pb AAaE: | ~ ]o TewradQ IEE 64/82} LT J | Lo le |) o7fo LZ YT ‘“/E-V 8 96 8 £6 76 06 16] 68 ss] 98] 2 es} z8 78| 08 T8 SL 6L 9] LL | ean3sTy og S 8 & Ss 2 174 UMd GaSUVHOSIG SAI TENaSsV TaNd INddS dO WagWiNn BSuTivseuT3uq | o8 O8 08 og 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 os 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 | || fez 08 ET8ILS {8 at 8T 108 947 cv [ler 08 6S ze 08 08 Sy uotysnqmoy) }LS |16| AK [€9 94 | i ZZ} age S6|76| eb) fotzeusos A 08 O8 QACNVAAC Fr 128 ert) L €6| NA J | 2628 oT] El) |e 76] A eoawa- BuTssadoidey SAITENASSVY OP Z Té& | | OB} 06/68| QNvWad ) ET EO cor s]s0) s]s0) | ES|GEISE esr oFAsTTesy 88 [7 TdOd O UVvaaA dO oseg oseg 28/98] | INAdS AL BE AA A | ZLAA ALT SELEVIVE BE oseg Ss] NH dO LL eyL tt y8sles| WadWNN PA Saetny ve x A | tT POA > a ra AMAA TZ}0 A A BEsaws T?é EI A A Ze ES) MAK uoTIDeTes rT Pro se T8} AT I A YL AK | A Fr | 0 A> A 08 LL ON] ys AO a DE 4 J] Le — 0 62/82) TewtqadgQ Pd Lo lL La 4 0 {10 LZ || ‘*gE-V 9 8 £6 76 76 0 16 g8| 8] es} 78 c8 c8 T8 08 el 9 Ld eaNnsTy § 8 5 S a ™ <4 175 Q9/AMG CaASUVHOSIG SAL TENASSV TaNd INAdS dO WagWn WARDeTY 9€ O8ZIEE O8ZIEE GT GT €8t €8t OS £8 £8 1 1 96 96 6 6 est est €8T €8T C81 C81 Stl Stl e8t e8t TOT TOT I I Tereuey | | |€€ 46; 46; V+ V+ v1 96 96 foTieuscsg 89 89 89 89 S6/%6| S6/%6| €8 €8 GHQNVWAG GHQNVWAG 90 90 €6| €6| Burssaooidey 76) 76) SHITENASSVY SHITENASSVY s}sop T6 T6 T T 06) 06) QNVWad unqtuein 68 68 USCTI6 USCTI6 ofistTTeey Tad Tad dO £8} 98) 98) £8} %Oz7+ UVvaaA | | INAdS INAdS 68] 68] eseg ‘aseg £8 £8 S8 S8 JO JO l6é0uze l6é0uze fetny 78)/€8) 78)/€8) WagWON WagWON | | uoTIoeTeg gvio gvio 78 78 T8; T8; O08 O08 Tewr3dQ 62/8 62/8 ‘6E-V eansTy ADUVHOSIG dO UVaAA 176 GASUVHOSIG SAI TERXSSV 9/AMA Tand LNadS dO WaaWNN WfA}DeTY os 9f est O8LTIEE O8LTIEE T [erauey {te £6| LY 94 foTrzeusog 89ST 89ST S6| 76) QHQNVAA | | 904 904 €6| BuTssadoiday 814 814 76; 6380) 904 904 SHITENASSV T6 161] 161] aseg 06) QNVWad QNVWad 6718716 6718716 68 OTAsT[eey fen[eA TaiNd dO dO £8} UVaA UVaA \68 \68 wnNTUOINTg INAdS 98] sseg | | 28 28 S8| dO [601178 [601178 fatny 78/€8| WHaWn oN By |o |o By uoToeTag 78 T8 | | 0 0 lo lo Tewrado 62|8 “O¥-V ean3aTy ADSUVHOSICG dO UVaAs 177 9/AMG gg gg a5 a5 Fo Fo rs rs aS aS 33 33 Be Be By By Ba Ba WF1}0eT_ [est [est est est €8Il €8Il este este est est C8T C8T ts ts «eel «eel 3 3 LEH LEH ES ES «Lee «Lee Est Est EST EST EST EST EST EST EST EST EST EST Est Est EST EST | | ff ff fos fos {ST {ST IBLTIEE IBLTIEE 1196 1196 7d 7d |Esl |Esl ESET ESET Est Est WEST WEST LOT LOT EST EST jest jest eet eet Sy Sy | | Teavsusey Par Par ject ject |16| |16| IZ IZ det det . 41] 41] ee ee 94 94 wi wi foTrzeuacg 89 89 891881 891881 er er S6|%6| S6|%6| t8t t8t Spr Spr bb bb GACNVWNAG ees ees 90q 90q ripe ripe 4s0) A A ast ast €6] €6] pa pa BuTssedoiday BIZ] BIZ] tile tile est est 26] 26] A A Ll Ll unqueaig | | 904 904 eet eet SHITENASSVY Td Td lL lL Léll6yI8z1 Léll6yI8z1 tet tet SS} SS} 06/68] 06/68] EET EET (NVWAd (NVWAd a a YO7+ [for [for OTAsT[eay [8c [8c 8B 8B Tana fENTeA dO dO 16 16 WwCeeseaaa WwCeeseaaa ee ee 28/98] 28/98] UVaA LAA LAA [68 [68 INAdS Mae2eeeeaa-2A Mae2eeeeaa-2A AAA AAA 2 2 WNTUOINTY aseg | | Zea Zea 28}60lzes 28}60lzes £8 £8 SB] SB] dO ELE ELE oon oon faetny 78/E8| 78/E8| WHGHAN (AXA (AXA pe pe AA AA TEEPE TEEPE ZA ZA ae ae AA AA pele pele | | oN oh oh uot By By TT TT 84#f[ 84#f[ ET ET Ze Ze EEL EEL 1 1 oeTes |o |o TS] TS] AA AA Er Er KT KT 4 4 tT tT OUT OUT Kk Kk lo lo OU OU OF OF Ae Ae TeuTadg tb tb as as OL OL — — [o Jo [o [o Jo [o 64) 64) AD AD | | 8Z| 8Z| 4 4 EL EL Ld Ld “Ty-VW 96 96 s6 s6 76 76 £6 £6 86 86 oe oe ee] ee] era era eg} eg} 98 98 zB zB T8 T8 08 08 64 64 el el ii ii 9 9 | | eansTy | | : : 8 8 v v & & 5 5 q q ™ ™ 178 GaSuVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Tand INGdS dO WaAaWNN YUMd esnoysuTjsom 79 79 79 79 99 99 79 79 79 79 79 79 99 99 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 9 79 79 79 79 "79 99 79 9 9 CL? CL? AY AY HYD HYD 8380) | | 09) 09) £6| ede103s 29492 29492 foTieusss 96 $6) | | 78176 78176 96) ZOZ- CHCNVWAC BuTssevorday €6 | | ‘Se8e10IS £6} £6} 26) T6|S8 T6|S8 SHITEWASSY TG 06) YOT+ | | QNVWAd QNVWAd ITISTTeSY 99/SS 99/SS 68 ‘uNTUeAN ‘Tand | | dO dO T#] T#] £8} UVaA YCOT+ INddS 6E 6E 98) YOZT- 16€ 16€ $8) fetTny | | 40 ‘NMS SVIDE SVIDE 78)€8| WHOWON uot ZOZT- JET JET 78 oeTes | | “NMS O O T8 10 10 Temtadg ZOT+ | | 0 0 ‘eseg 10 10 ‘°Zy-V eansTy ADUVHOSIG dO avas 179 GaSaVHOSIG SAL TENASSV TaNd INAdS 40 WadWiN UMd "9 79 79 49 79 "9 79 79 79 79 79 PnoysuzAsom 79 99 "9 79 79 49 99 99 79 9 9 cL? | 09} L6| L6| L9I9Z foTazeusos foTazeusos 96 96 S6|76/| S6|76/| 78 QHQNVWAC | 26} BuTssoooiday BuTssoooiday €6) €6) 26; 76) 76) T6}S8 SHITENASSV T& T& 4809 4809 06| 06| QNVWad QNVWad | OFASTT OFASTT 991SS 68 68 unTuery unTuery TaiDd dO dO Vay Vay ITY £8) 98] 98] £8) | UVaA YCT+ YCT+ ZOT+ ZOT+ INddS GE /6E S8 S8 Satny Satny | dO SH) 78/€8| 78/€8| WadWAN 9ETET] worqoeTes worqoeTes 78 78 O TS TS JO Teur3ydg Teur3ydg | O 10 “°Ey-V “°Ey-V 2ANnsTY 2ANnsTY ADUVHOSIC dO UvaA 180 GHSUVHOSIC SAL TENASSV Tand INddS dO UaeWiN Wid VsnoyZuyzjsey 79 79 cL? cL? 9 9 Sy 79 99 7¢ 79 79 79 | | | 09) 09) 09 09 6 Z9OI9ZL Z9OI9ZL ”9 fotzeussg "9 G6} 76 (aGNVAAC | 26 26 Butsssooidey €6| 26 26 76) S]S0) | | T6|S8 T6|S8 SZITENASSV T& eseg 06) (NVAad OTASTTeey 9 9 68 fon~TeA SS SS THA dO ITY ITY £8} | | UVaA unptuo INAdS ¥¢T+ GEl6E GEl6E 98] Nt S8 fetTny dO [Sy [Sy 78) WAGWON | | ON 9EJEZT} 9EJEZT} £8) uotjoeTes 78 O O T8 }O }O Tewpzadg | | O O ‘Hy-VW aaNn3Ta ADSUVHOSIG dO UvAs 181 GaSUuVHOSIG SAI TENASSV Taha INAdS dO WaaWNN Wd esnoyBuzysem 79 v9 2 79 49 73 2 "9 : 79 79 79 79 73 99 79 79 79 9 9 || ZI¥ 979 We Wve [49 79 {179 79 8; | {09 |L6| 0 | OAK £9192 29 € fotzaeusos 94 OA 99F ZT A S6|%6| i 178 T9 ez] ates KIA 4040 GaGNVRAG | WY PF | BuTsssoordey 3809) 76| MEA eelet WN €6) 4A 26 Oz 79 76| UD 4 UMTUPIN | | h SAITENASSVY 16] 6s| ze I TG Iu S8 S uta 06) (NVWad 7 4YOZ+ OTASTTeOY 199 Z 9 68/| | AAT SS| T 9 TaXd nS 88 FENTeA til dO TY? 192 LT 28/98) §=a4 YvaA LAA a YGT+ j6€ INAdS AA AAAI a LT MNTV0ORINTY e144 | i CEeceewesaaass eae 6EISY 6€ SB SeTny dO GH AA 78/E8| WHaWN [9€ APPLET TA AN 9 AL AA uoTioeTes ZL A ON PALA “4 A Jee] ctf zB nt 1 OX TTT). Ae OF aoe TS) KK + OW Para 2 Ah TT PLT O Teup3do A OF ote 1 | KS. OF 62) a Le 2 7 a O 82| |} "Cy-V O Z S$ 96 €6 76 86 T6 06 es} 68 etal cel 78 $8 oan3sty z8 T8 £48 62 L LL 9 | E & o & it é © 182 GaSUVHOSIC Sal TANASSV Tad INddS dO WadWnNn YMd YMd BFsnoysutjasam BFsnoysutjasam 99 CL? 9 | | 09 O9;| L6 L6 79 LOLOL fofreusss fofreusss 9 S6| S6| | | 78) 78) 76 76 CHQNVWAG | | 76 76 ButTssaed.ordsy ButTssaed.ordsy 3809 3809 €6| €6| | | 26) 26) 76} 76} unzTueIg unzTueIg T6}S8 T6}S8 SHITENASSVY TG TG 06| 06| | | (NVWAC (NVWAC ITASTTeSY ITASTTeSY %Oz- %Oz- 99} 99} 68 68 SS SS Tid fenTeA fenTeA 40 40 ITY ITY £8} £8} | | UVaA YCT+ YCT+ INdadS GEJ6E GEJ6E 98} 98} UNTUOINTY, UNTUOINTY, S8i S8i fetTnyY fetTnyY | | 40 S¥) S¥) 78)/€8)| 78)/€8)| UxEWON 9ETEZ 9ETEZ wot wot ON ON zoepTes zoepTes 7g 7g | | O O TS TS | | Teupadg Teupadg O O ‘*gH-V ‘*gH-V aaNnsTy aaNnsTy ADUVAOSIC dO UVAA 183 CaSaVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Tand INGdS dO WadWn UMd UMd esnoysuT esnoysuT cLlY cLlY sem sem L6 L6 L9 L9 fopTAeusss fopTAeusss | 9L/178 9L/178 | "9 S6| S6| T9 €¢c 76 76 QHQNVWAC QHQNVWAC | | 16T 79 BZuysssoorday BZuysssoorday 3809 3809 {26 {26 €6| €6| | {26 {26 22 cs 76; 76; a8e109S a8e109S |T6 |T6 79 SHITENASSVY SHITENASSVY TG TG | | S8I99 S8I99 06) 06) QNVAaC QNVAaC OTASTTeSy OTASTTeSy YOZ+ YOZ+ 68 68 | | SSI SSI Tad Tad SanTeA SanTeA 40 40 TY TY 48/98 48/98 UVAA YOT+ YOT+ I6E I6E INaAdS INaAdS wNTUOCINT, wNTUOCINT, | | | | GES GES S8/ S8/ fatTny fatTny 40 40 78) 78) UHaWNN UHaWNN IDE IDE €8] €8] uoyzIoeTas uoyzIoeTas on on | | ET] ET] 7s 7s TS TS O| O| G G Teuradg Teuradg | | 0; 0; O O ‘*/y-y ‘*/y-y eansTy eansTy ADUVHOSIC 40 Uvads 184 CHSUVHOSIC SaITaRaASsSv TaN4d INHdS dO UAEWNN WMd esnoyZutzseM CL7} CL7} ¥ ¥ 99 99 "9 79 92 99. 99 79 8; | | 109 109 09129 09129 16 79 79 foTzeuecs | | 9L| 9L| 99 $6|%6| 7816 7816 T9 €¢ €¢ CHQNVAAC 79 Butssad.o0idey 3809 T T €6 | | 246) 246) 26| |S? |S? 398e103S T6 T6 TY TY 0 0 SHITENASSV Td | | S81 S81 06) GNVAAC OTASTTeey 7OZ- 99 99 68 | | SS} SS} ‘THQ fanTeA dO T7I6€ T7I6€ z9|98| Uvas ¥CoT+ LINadS uUNTUuOINT_ | | Sel GE|S7I/9E GE|S7I/9E feTNyY 40 veles| WadWnnN vot ON | | zoeTes EZ; EZ; ze 8 OF OF Temtadg OF OF O O | | OF OF ‘*gy-V O O eansTy ADUVHOSIG 40 UvaAs 185 CaSUVHOSIC SAL IENASSV Q/IMA Tand LNAdS dO YagWNN WTaAqVVaTy_ Of Of est est ISVTES ISVTES vT vT 7 8cl 8S est est eet est €sT Sy 8 [ezsuey |L6| TEI TEI 94 fofAzeusds C6U9TS C6U9TS S6|%6| GaQNVWAC LEA LEA €6| BurTsseooidey TSeLEc TSeLEc 26) SAITHNASSV S3s09 TG OCA OCA 06; (NVWad IL IL wnTuerg 68 OTIST[BSY TLy TLy Tad O UVvaAs dO £8/98| ~O7+ INAdS ZOTIOOTIcz ZOTIOOTIcz YCOT+ ‘eseg S8 dO feTNyY tT] tT] 781€8| WaeWNN v6iss v6iss uot 78 oeTes lo |o |o lo TS jo jo Tewradg ‘6y-y eAN3Ty ASUVHOSIG dO UvaA 186 9/YMA >z >z Bg Bg Fo Fo Be Be Bs Bs Ea Ea Q Q 34 34 ae ae gE gE [ee [ee = = WTAWOSTY He He | corpo corpo Ee Ee EST EST €8T €8T Es Es eet eet Lest Lest bee bee eetfesip eetfesip [eet] [eet] E81 E81 €8T €8T EBT EBT EST EST EST EST EST EST EST EST E8T.|] E8T.|] est est EST EST || || || || || || || || |] |] |] |] || || ‘USvhesT ‘USvhesT rt rt ss ss Est Est €8T €8T 8zT 8zT 68 68 ve ve €8T €8T €8T €8T est est Sr Sr Ter9ueyH | | RSP RSP |£6| |£6| + + (ou (ou 69 69 I I 94 94 it it oT oT fotaeuscs esty esty e6T e6T S6|76| S6|76| i i te te est est 9Tq 9Tq CHONVWAC eet eet | | 4 4 ez ez 7Sj96 7Sj96 tb] tb] €6| €6| i i ZuTssesooraday tozzeq tozzeq sot sot 76] 76] $3s09) | | TA] TA] tetra tetra ys ys SHITENASSY FI FI T4 T4 | | et et fezt] fezt] OCA OCA eseg eT eT 9£ 9£ GZ GZ 06/68| 06/68| | | QNVWad QNVWad TT TT TLIZY TLIZY Hid Hid + + OFISTT fan L4T L4T Fat] Fat] 8H 8H Tanda [eA dO dO SON SON 9¢ 9¢ 64 64 Ces Ces 28/98] 28/98] Boy YVaA wnNTuo_ANT, CAAA CAAA zoq zoq INddS |ZOT |ZOT FFF FFF ¥oT+ Cees Cees ooze] ooze] oo oo a a ssl ssl 40 cclL-f_ cclL-f_ fSeTMy AA AA va va 78} 78} WadWnN ON (AAAI (AAAI AALHIE AALHIE 7615S 7615S A A 6) 6) An An Es] Es] TT TT uoTIoeTeS Sewewa Sewewa TA TA GS GS AAA AAA AAT AAT TOT TOT OT OT LILES LILES Ze Ze Tt Tt fT fT HK HK ON ON Ub Ub |0 |0 T8| T8| AILEY AILEY Or Or eK eK xX) xX) aars aars lb) lb) oe oe 10 10 7 7 Oe Oe OK OK OK OK OM OM a a 2 2 | | TeWTIdQ b b 62) 62) a a LE LE T7 T7 7 7 [0 [0 82] 82] LT LT p p LZ LZ *OC-V S S £6 £6 76 76 86 86 oe oe 16 16 |e |e 8] 8] | | 98} 98} c8 c8 es} es} 78, 78, $8 $8 T8 T8 08 08 6L 6L SZ SZ 9 9 im im saNnsTy 2 2 iS iS 3 3 5 5 38 38 ™ ™ ! ! 187 9/UMA GaSUVHOSIC SAL TERASSV Tanda INAdS dO WaegWnn OTAQOeT_ €8T est est est est est est €8T est €8T €sT eet €8T €8T €8T €8T €8T est €8T e8T est est TS? TS? Of €8T val est 8cT 8S Sy Sy €8t 68 7E est est €8T €8T Terzeuay |L6| |L6| S 69 69 94 94 foTieuscs € $6} 76) 76) $6} OTA CaQNVNAC Lee 3809 3809 €6| €6| BuTssaj0iday TS7zezjOc7 76| 76| UNpUeIQ UNpUeIQ SHI Ta Ta TAWASSV 06) 06) (NVWad (NVWad YOT+ YOT+ 68 68 IZ OTFISTTeoy Tey Tafa feNTeA feNTeA dO dO £8/98/| YvVaA YvVaA INAdS cCOTOOTKEZT| UNPFUOCINT_ UNPFUOCINT_ YCOT+ S8 dO foeTny 78; WadWON 76 €8! oN oN uofjoetes 156 78 78 | 0 TS 10 Tewp3do 0 0 ‘I¢-V aansta ADUVAOSIC dO AvaAA 188 CHOUVHOSIG Sal IENHssv TaNd INddS dO WaadWnn WMd esnoyZurjsemM 99 99 782) 782) 8Z "9 79 "9 $380) I 89|S2 89|S2 79 79 |46| e8e103§ 79 79 foFreusss 96 198 198 79 79 6 76) S6) | | S6|POTEOTICOT96 S6|POTEOTICOT96 99 99 ~OZT- QHONVAAC 979 979 BuTssoooaday €6) ‘eBe103g 99 26| 79 SHITENASSVY Tq 02 99 6 06/68 ZO7+ | | QNVWad QNVWad BFASTTeoY L179 L179 |8 c 79 “MNTUeIN |c9 Ta0d | | dO dO Lely Lely £8} YVaA INAdS YOE+ 98 YOZ- lye lye feTNY | | dO ‘NMS TSloy TSloy 978) UHEWON €8| woTzoeTes ZOZ- faz faz 78 | | ‘NMS oO oO T8 | | Tewsadg O O ZO7T+ “esta “°z¢-V eanstTy ADUVAOSIG dO UVaA 189 GASUVHOSIC SAI TEnaSsv Tand INGdS dO UaaWNN UMd Ssnoysuy3semM 782 79 189 99 L6 L6 | SZ| foTreusess 98 S6| S6| 1S6 76 76 QHCNVAAG | | BuTssadoadsy €6) €6) POTI60TIcoT) 26| 26| SHI'TENASSY TG TG 96 3509 06/ 06/ (NWWad (NWWad Ivz OFISTTeey 68 68 munFuern | Z9)L7 TiNa dO dO £8} £8} dvdr lbh ZOc+ YOE+ INadS 98 98 | vy fe ITS dO Tny 78/€8| 78/€8| WHaWNN OF uot }97} IoVeTesg 78 78 O10 T8 T8 Tempjdg | O10 *Ec-y ean3Ty ADSUVAOSIG dO avaAd 190 CHSUVHOSIC SAITENESSV Tanda INAdS dO UaEWiN UMd VPsnoyZutysam 98C 98C 79 79 |89 |89 79 79 L6 JSZ JSZ T T foyTzeussg | | | | 98 98 22 22 S6| |S6 |S6 122 122 76 CHQNVANAG | fPOT|GOTEOT] fPOT|GOTEOT] Bursssvoidsey €6) 26; S3s09 SAITENASSVY TE 96 96 osegq 06/68 | | QNVNAd QNVNAd oFASsTTeseYy 74)79 74)79 fonTeA Tanda IZ¥ IZ¥ dO dO £8) UVaA | vy| vy| | amypUoINtg INAdS YOE+ 98} oy oy S8| S8| feTMY dO ITS ITS 78)€8} WadWON ON |ovj9oz |ovj9oz uoTIoeTes 78 10} 10} TS Tewradg O O ‘“yC-y eansTy ADUVHOSIG dO uvas 191 CHOUVHOSIC SAI TENXSSV Tad INZdS dO WaaWNNn YUMd esnoy3utTysem 979 979 782 782 8c 79 79 79 87 | | 89 89 79 79 |16| [SL [SL 79 79 fotTzeuessg 96 | | 98/S6 98/S6 79 S6/%6| 79 QHQNVWAC 79 3809 BuTsseooiday €6| |VOT/60TIEOT] |VOT/60TIEOT] 76| uNTuRIQ SHITENASSY TE 96 96 06/68 ONVAAd ONVAAd |7Z |7Z YOZ+ OTASTTeey | | 29/27] 29/27] THOA fenTeA 40 40 £8; UVdA INAdS voE+ 98 vY}) vY}) wNTUOINTY vYITS vYITS feTNyY dO 78) WHaWNN €8) [OF [OF uot ON 197} 197} oeTes 7g 0} 0} TS 0 0 Tewfzadg | | O| O| O O *cc-y eansTy ADUVHOSIC dO Uvas 192 CaSUVHOSIC SAI TENHSSV Tand INZdS dO WaaWNN WMd ssnoyZupyysem 8c 8c 79 8¢ 79 79 I | | 89)S2 89)S2 79 |46| 79 foTzeuscss 96 | | 79 T 98] 98] S6/ S6/7OT60Ti S6/7OT60Ti 4€9 76 GHCNVAAC | BursseoorAdey 3809 €6) 26| umntuRIQ COT COT SHITGNASSVY Ta 96] 96] 06/68 QNVWad QNVWad OTASTTeoy YOZ- 72 72 1z79 1z79 THOA | | fenTeA dO dO Lvl Lvl £8/98| YVar INHdS YoC+ y y UNTu0 lye lye S8| feTMY | | 40 TS|O¥ TS|O¥ 78/€8| NT, WHaWNN uot ON Joz Joz oeTeS ze |O |O TS | | Tewrjadg 0} 0} O O ‘gc-V aan3Ty ADMVHOSICG dO UvaAs 193 CaDUVHOSIG Sal TdWassv TaNd INHdS dO WadWN UMd asnoy8upisesm 9 99 79 "9 49 49 "9 7 "79 79 99 VAS) 09 79 79 "9 79 99 79 79 79 [| | 19 78¢}89 ez 79 79 179 8: mE [7 |16| Dyes) {SZ [TT ~9C foTzeusss 94 tet | |[ 98] yop T Tz eA $6|%6| S6 TE 9 1 QaQNVAAC |70T 9 |€€ Z Butssevoidey 3809) KK) C6 an UE gt LL 76] Pr) >) ro 9382039S COT] 99 SHITANASSVY 7 TE LL. 96172 Z9|Z LT 06) he, IL GNVNad ct oFastTTeey YOZ+ 02 02 68] ess |] |29 KS —<] S Tand SB SenTeA | dO WECeEeseaaawaA Zyl L 28] ya UvaaA cess ZEeecesteaeaa-2 22ne INAdS BaCcseCceCceeawaeA yoc+ 77 "Y 98] umMTuo{Nt_ | ZEeeeeaa4 vyITS yy SB feTny dO COL 6T ysles| WadWNN LA lor AN [Ov AA A At AT uofjoetTes Ae ON ray eee [9zlo Z ON sawas NK 97f Ze A At. 18) HA OS OK OW AX. KK | Tf 4 0 Teuyadg As KS OF a s };0 64/82] | OD Lo 7 wa oO] ‘“/c-Vy 0 LZ 9 s6 £6 96 76 Te] 76 6s] 88 “8 9] oe 48 c8 z8 08 T8 6l eanstTy 81 9 LL aj & 9 é 194 GHOUVHOSIC SAL'IsKASSV TaN4 INadS dO WadWNNn UMd VesnoysuytjsemM 79 SZ Sy 99 99 99 79 8d 79 {89 |46| 79 SZ foTreuess 94 | 98|S6 79 S6/%76| 79 GHCNVWAC 380) BuTssad.oraday 79 €6| |VOT/60TICOT| 99 26] 898PI09IS SHITANASSY TG 96 06/68 QNVWad QNVWad OTISTTeey YOZ— |7Z | Z91L¥ THOA faNTeA dO dO 28/98) Var ~OE+ |v INAdS uMFUuOINT, | vVITS S8/ faeTMY dO 78/€8| | WadWN uotqoeTes Ov1 ON 97] zg O| TS 0 Temtjadg | O| 62/8 0 ‘*gc-Vy eaANnsTy ADUVAOSIG dO UvaA 195 GHSUVHOSIC SAI'TENASSV Q/UMA Tanda INAdS 40 WaaWN OF1DeTA_ OF1DeTA_ est €8t €8T Z esl esi Sy [Terseuey [Terseuey |L6| 96 fopyieussg fopyieussg 6 76] S6| GHCNVWAG 189 189 €6) Bupsseooidey Bupsseooidey 26; SaT'IGNASSVY $380) $380) TE 872476 872476 06/68 QNVAad untueIn untueIn DTASTTeey DTASTTeey Tanda dO TH TH £8) Z%OZ+ Z%OZ+ UvaA INadS 98 OTYET OTYET YOE+ YOE+ ‘aseg ‘aseg 40 feTMY feTMY 78)/€8| WHaWNN LOTK9 LOTK9 woTqoeTes woTqoeTes csi |0 |0 TS Teupadg Teupadg *@C-V *@C-V 2ANBTT 2ANBTT ADUVHOSIG dO AVaA 196 CaDSUVHOSIC SAI TENASSV Q/UMA Tand INddS dO WadWNn SFlAIOeTY GTTQELT GTTQELT OT [ezsuey L6 L6 169 169 fofFaeussg Slav77pgc Slav77pgc S6| S6| 76 76 (aHCNVAAC (aHCNVAAC | | £6) £6) ButTssadoraday 26| 26| s3s09 SHITGNASSV SHITGNASSV TG TG 8 8 osegq 06) 06) QNVWad 68 68 oOTIASsTTeey fenTeA TaNd TaNd dO STUOTIETT STUOTIETT £8/ £8/ UvVaA wnpTuojINt”d INdAdS INdAdS 98 98 YOE+ 40 40 |2vYZOT] |2vYZOT] feTMY 781€8} 781€8} WadWnn WadWnn ON voTFIoeTesg 29 29 78 78 |0 |0 T8 T8 ; ; Tewpado *Q9-V ean3Tyq ADUVHOSIG dO avaA 197 CaSUVHOSIG SAI TENASsSV Q/UMA Tand INdadS dO UWaeWiN OFA}ZOOTY €8t €8t 1 1 Terzousy | | 46 46 Tellela Tellela toTzeusss S6| S6| 76 76 vod vod QHQNVNAG QHQNVNAG | | sodcecsode sodcecsode 3sOD £6] £6] SuTssa.0idey 76] 76] uNFurPIN SATIGNASSVY SATIGNASSVY T& T& 06) 06) QNVWad QNVWad YOZ+ 68 68 OFASTTeey TaNa TaNa SONTEA dO dO £8|98/| £8|98/| YVaA YVaA OTIe OTIe INAdS INAdS UNTUOINT_ YOE+ S8) S8) 40 40 lucy lucy fSaTNY 78)€8| 78)€8| WaaWNN WaaWNN ON uoTIoeTes 78 78 T8 T8 Tewpado 62 62 "T9-V ean3Ty ADUVAHOSIG dO avas 198 CHSUVHOSIG SAI TERASSV S S 5 5 > > a a : : un un YUMd $3809 esnoySuyt 179 179 } } [9 [9 9 9 79 79 79 79 79 79 "9 "9 99 99 "9 "9 99 99 79 79 fo fo 79 79 79 79 79 79 9 9 79 79 ae ae 9 9 79 79 || || || || || || || || || || Il Il jj jj Wt Wt BBe103§ ELL] ELL] 9 9 Yet Yet 9 9 €€ €€ 9€ 9€ LE LE 1% 1% ts ts 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Sy Sy 79 79 sem 72S} 72S} [esp [esp |L6| |L6| Parr Parr YOZ- SrA SrA 8S 8S foTieusss a a 94 94 wh ]99 ]99 9~PLayaArth 9~PLayaArth elt elt S6| S6| AAs AAs ‘eBe103S | | EL} EL} nessa nessa ¢ ¢ 46} 46} QHCNVWAC Butssod.oidey cL cL |8 |8 €6| €6| TST TST LE LE lds) lds) VO VO ZO7T+ fet fet 19K 19K 76] 76] oswa2 oswa2 | | TS TS [TS [TS SHITENASSVY T& T& OF OF Ll) Ll) ‘uNFURIN ivy ivy we we 06/68) 06/68) GNVNAG GNVNAG lL lL | | OTASTMTSSeg i i TE} TE} teh teh