Love Canal Factpack

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Love Canal Factpack Love Canal FactPack FactPack – P001 Center for Health, Environment & Justice P.O. Box 6806, Falls Church, VA 22040-6806 703-237-2249 [email protected] www.chej.org Love Canal FactPack Center for Health, Environment & Justice FactPack – P001 Updated August 2009 Copyright 2009 by Center for Health, Environment & Justice. All rights reserved. For Permission to reprint, please contact CHEJ. Printed in the U.S.A. P.O. Box 6806 Falls Church, VA 22040-6806 703-237-2249 [email protected] www.chej.org Center for Health, Environment & Justice P.O. Box 6806 l Falls Church, VA 22040 l Phone: 703.237.2249 l Fax: 703.237.8389 l www.chej.org Mentoring a Movement Empowering People Preventing Harm About the Center for Health, Environment & Justice CHEJ mentors the movement to build healthier communities by empowering people to prevent the harm caused by chemical and toxic threats. We accomplish our work by connecting local community groups to national initiatives and corporate campaigns. CHEJ works with communities to empower groups by providing the tools, strategic vision, and encouragement they need to advocate for human health and the prevention of harm. Following her successful effort to prevent further harm for families living in contaminated Love Canal, Lois Gibbs founded CHEJ in 1981 to continue the journey. To date, CHEJ has assisted over 10,000 groups nationwide. Details on CHEJ’s efforts to help families and communities prevent harm can be found on www.chej.org. Table of Contents pg. 1 Chapter 1. A History of Love Canal pg. 3 Chapter 2. Love Canal Homeowners Association pg. 5 Chapter 3. A Summary of Events pg. 7 Chapter 4. Community Health Studies pg. 12 Chapter 5. Key Dates of Events at Love Canal pg. 15 Appendix. Love Canal News Collection Center for Health, Environment & Justice | Mentoring a Movement, Empowering People, Preventing Harm P.O. Box 6806 | Falls Church, VA 22040 | Phone: 703.237.2249 | Fax: 703.237.8389 | www.chej.org Chapter 1 History of Love Canal The history of Love Canal began in 1892 when for one dollar. Hooker included in the deed transfer William T. Love proposed connecting the upper a “warning” of the chemical wastes buried on the and lower Niagara River by digging a canal six to property and a disclaimer absolving Hooker of any seven miles long. By doing this, Love hoped to future liability. harness the water of the upper Niagara River Perhaps because they didn’t understand the potential into a navigable channel, which would create risks associated with Hooker’s chemical wastes, the a man-made waterfall with a 280-foot drop into Board of Education began in 1954 to construct an the lower Niagara River, providing cheap power. elementary school on the canal property. The 99th However, the country fell into an economic Street School was completed by 1955, opening its depression and financial backing for the project doors to about 400 students each year. slipped away. Love then abandoned the project, Homebuilding around the old canal also began in leaving behind a partially dug section of the canal, the 1950’s. However, homeowners were never given sixty feet wide and three thousand feet long. In 1920, any warning or information that would indicate that the land was sold at public auction and became a the property was located near a chemical waste dump. municipal and chemical disposal site until 1953. The Most families who moved into the area were unaware principal company that dumped waste in the canal of the old landfill and its poisons. The one-time canal was Hooker Chemical Corporation,a subsidiary of looked very innocent, like any field anywhere. It Occidental Petroleum. The City of Niagara and the certainly did not appear to be a chemical dump United States Army used the site as well, with the with 20,000 tons of toxic wastes buried beneath it. city dumping garbage and the Army possibly dumping parts of the Manhattan Project and In 1978, there were approximately 800 private other chemical warfare material. single-family homes and 240 lowincome apartments built around the canal. The elementary school was In 1953, after filling the canal and covering it with located near the center of the landfill. The Niagara dirt, Hooker sold the land to the Board of Education www.chej.org 1 [email protected] Love Canal River, to the south and a creek to the north of the landfill formed natural boundaries for the area affected by the migrating chemicals. From the late 1950’s through the 1970’s, people repeatedly complained of odors and substances surfacing near or in their yards and on the school playground. The city, responding to these complaints, visited the area and covered the “substances” with dirt or clay. After years of complaints, the city and county hired a consultant to investigate. In 1976, the Calspan Corporation completed a study of the canal area and found toxic chemical residues in the air and sump pumps of a high percentage of homes at the southern end of the canal. They also found drums just beneath or on the surface, and high levels of PCB’s in the storm sewer system. Calspan recommended that the canal be covered with clay, home sump pumps be sealed off and a tile drainage system be installed to control the migration of wastes. However, nothing was done by the city with the exception of placing window fans in a few homes found to contain high levels of chemical residues. In March of 1978, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) began collecting air and soil tests in basements and conducting a health study of the 239 families that immediately encircled the canal. The Health Department found an increase in reproductive problems among women and high levels of chemical contaminants in soil and air. 2 Center for Health, Environment & Justice | Mentoring a Movement, Empowering People, Preventing Harm Chapter 2 Love Canal Homeowners Association Love Canal Homeowners Association (LCHA) Gibbs first approached the School Board armed was established in August of 1978 to give the with notes from two physicians recommending the community a voice in the decisions made during transfer of her child to another public school. But the Love Canal environmental crisis. LCHA the Board refused to transfer her child stating that if membership consisted of approximately 500 it was unsafe for her son, then it would be unsafe for families living within a 10-block area surrounding all children and they were not going to close the the Love Canal landfill. The community consisted school because of one concerned mother with of bluecollar workers with an average annual income a sickly child. Gibbs was angered and began talking of $10,000-$25,000. The majority of people worked with other parents in the neighborhood to see if they in local industries which were largely chemical. were having problems with their children’s health. After speaking with hundreds of people, she realized The Love Canal Homeowners Association grew that the entire community was affected. out of another group established in June 1978, the Love Canal Parents Movement. The Parents On August 2, 1978, the New York State Department Movement was started by Lois Gibbs, who lived of Health (NYSDOH) issued a health order. The in the neighborhood and whose children attended health order recommended that the 99th Street the 99th Street School. Ms. Gibbs, unaware of School be closed (a victory), that pregnant women the dump, was alerted first by newspaper articles and children under the age of two be evacuated, that describing the landfill, its wastes, and proximity to residents not eat out of their home gardens and that the 99th StreetSchool. Having a small sickly child they spend limited time in their basements. A few attending the school, Gibbs became very concerned days later, the state agreed to purchase all 239 homes about the danger the landfill posed to the school. in the first two rings of homes closest to the canal. She also realized that the school being built so These unprecedented actions served to bring the close to the landfill might have something to do residents together to form a strong united citizens with her son’s poor health. organization, and served as the stepping stone to the www.chej.org 3 [email protected] Love Canal establishment of the Love Canal Homeowners The Love Canal and the Surrounding Neighborhood Association. Within a week of the health order, the residents held a public meeting, elected officers and set goals for the newly formed organization. All goals set at that time were ultimately reached. 4 Center for Health, Environment & Justice | Mentoring a Movement, Empowering People, Preventing Harm Chapter 3 A Summary of Events At the time of the first evacuation order in August system designed to “contain” the waste and prevent of 1978, the state established the Love Canal any outward migration of chemical leachate. A graded Interagency Task Force to coordinate the many trench system was dug around the canal to intercept activities undertaken at the canal. The task force migrating leachate and create a barrier drain system. had three major responsibilities: the relocation The containment system is shown below. of evacuated families, the continuation of health The leachate collected from the drain system is and environmental studies and the construction pumped to an on-site treatment plant that uses a of a drainage system to prevent further migration series of filters, most importantly, activated charcoal, of toxic chemicals. to remove chemicals from the waste stream. The Remedial Construction remaining “clean” water is then flushed down the sanitary sewer system.
Recommended publications
  • Toxic Residents: Health and Citizenship at Love Canal
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bucknell University Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Faculty Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Fall 2016 Toxic Residents: Health and Citizenship at Love Canal Jennifer Thomson Bucknell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_journ Part of the Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Thomson, Jennifer. "Toxic Residents: Health and Citizenship at Love Canal." Journal of Social History (2016) : 204-223. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Social History Advance Access published December 19, 2015 JENNIFER THOMSON Toxic Residents: Health and Citizenship at Love Canal Abstract Downloaded from This article investigates the relationship between American political culture and grassroots environmentalism in the 1970s. To do so, it examines how the white working class residents of Love Canal, New York, claimed health and a healthy en- vironment as rights of citizenship. To date, the Canal has remained a sore spot for environmental scholarship; this article demonstrates how the analytic difficulties http://jsh.oxfordjournals.org/ posed by the Canal stem from the crosscurrents of American political culture in the late 1970s. Canal residents put their local experience into several larger frames of reference: the rights and responsibilities of citizenship, the plight of Cuban and Vietnamese refugees, and a culture of skepticism toward government and medical authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Birth and Evolution of Korean Reality Show Formats
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Film, Media & Theatre Dissertations School of Film, Media & Theatre Spring 5-6-2019 Dynamics of a Periphery TV Industry: Birth and Evolution of Korean Reality Show Formats Soo keung Jung [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/fmt_dissertations Recommended Citation Jung, Soo keung, "Dynamics of a Periphery TV Industry: Birth and Evolution of Korean Reality Show Formats." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/fmt_dissertations/7 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Film, Media & Theatre at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Film, Media & Theatre Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DYNAMICS OF A PERIPHERY TV INDUSTRY: BIRTH AND EVOLUTION OF KOREAN REALITY SHOW FORMATS by SOOKEUNG JUNG Under the Direction of Ethan Tussey and Sharon Shahaf, PhD ABSTRACT Television format, a tradable program package, has allowed Korean television the new opportunity to be recognized globally. The booming transnational production of Korean reality formats have transformed the production culture, aesthetics and structure of the local television. This study, using a historical and practical approach to the evolution of the Korean reality formats, examines the dynamic relations between producer, industry and text in the
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches for Assessing Health Risks from Complex Mixtures in Indoor Air: a Panel Overview by Carol J
    Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 95, pp. 135-143, 1991 Approaches for Assessing Health Risks from Complex Mixtures in Indoor Air: A Panel Overview by Carol J. Henry,* Lawrence Fishbein,* William J. Meggs,t Nicholas A. Ashford,' Paul A. Schulte,§ Henry Anderson,/' J. Scott Osborne,' and Daniel W. Sepkovictt Critical to a more definitive human health assessment ofthe potential health risks from exposure to complex mixtures in indoor air is the need for a more definitive clinical measure and etiology ofthe helath effects ofcomplex mixtures. This panel overview highlights six ofthe eight presentations ofthe conference panel discussion and features a number ofthe major topical areas of indoor air concern. W. G. Meggs assessed clinical research priorities with primary focus on the role ofvolatile organic chemicals in human health, recognizing the areas where definitive data are lacking. By recogniz- ing many types ofchemical sensitivity, it may be possible to design studies that can illuminate the mechanisms by which chemical exposure may cause disease. The critically important topic of multiple chemical sensitivity was discussed by N. A. Ashford, who identified four high risk groups and defined the demographics ofthese groups. P. A. Schulte address- ed the issue ofbiological markers ofsusceptibility with specific considerations ofboth methodologia and societal aspects that may be operative in the ability to detect innate or inborne differences between individuals and populations. Three case studies were reviewed. H. Anderson discussed the past and present priorities from a public health perspective, focusing on those issues dealing with exposures to environmental tobacco smoke and formaldehyde off-gassing from materials used in mobile homeconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Love Canal Follow-Up Health Study
    Love Canal Follow-up Health Study Prepared by the Division of Environmental Health Assessment Center for Environmental Health New York State Department of Health for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry In memory of Charlene M. Spampinato and her longstanding dedication to the Love Canal project. October 2008 State of New York Funding Provided by Department of Health United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………....................iii LIST OF FIGURES.……………………………………………………………...............iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….............v LIST OF APPENDICES....…...…...…..…………………………………………...........vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………….........1 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………..5 Love Canal History……………………………………………………….6 Environmental Sampling………………………………………………….8 Study Area………………………………………………….....................10 Review of Earlier Love Canal Health Studies…………………………...11 Community Involvement………………………………………………...15 Study Objectives…………………………………………………………17 METHODS………………………………………………………………………………19 Study Population……………………………………………………........19 Comparison Populations………………………………………………....20 Tracing Former Love Canal Residents…………………………………..20 Exposure Assessment………………………………………………........22 Outcome Assessment……………………………………………….…....25 Mortality…………………………………………………….…...25 Cancer Incidence………………………………………………....26 Reproductive Outcomes……………………………………….…28 Potential Confounders…………………………………………………....31
    [Show full text]
  • Indoor Air Quality Factors in Designing a Healthy Building,” Annual
    Spengler, J.D. and Chen, Q. 2000. “Indoor air quality factors in designing a healthy building,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 567-600. Indoor Air Quality Factors in Designing a Healthy Building John D. Spengler School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; e-mail: [email protected] Qingyan (Yan) Chen Building Technology Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; e-mail: [email protected] KEY WORDS: regulations, contaminant sources, building materials and systems, ventilation models, design tools Shortened title: IAQ in Designing a Healthy Building Abstract Current guidelines for green buildings are cursory and inadequate for specifying materials and designing ventilation systems to ensure a healthful indoor environment, i.e. a “healthy building,” by design. Public perception, cultural preferences, litigation trends, current codes and regulations, rapid introduction of new building materials and commercial products, as well as the prevailing design-build practices, pose challenges to systems integration in the design, construction and operation phases of modern buildings. We are on the verge of a paradigm shift in ventilation design thinking. In the past, thermal properties of air within a zone determined heating, ventilating, and air- conditioning (HVAC) specifications. In the future, occupant-specific and highly responsive systems will become the norm. Natural ventilation, displacement ventilation, microzoning with subfloor plenums, along with the use of point of source heat control and point of use sensors, will evolve to create a "smart" responsive ventilation-building dynamic system. Advanced ventilation design tools such as the modeling of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) will be used routinely.
    [Show full text]
  • Polychlorinated Dibenzo-P-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans in the Great Lakes
    Hdb Env Chem Vol. 5, Part N (2006): 71–150 DOI 10.1007/698_5_040 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005 Published online: 2 December 2005 Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans in the Great Lakes Ross J. Norstrom Centre for Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada [email protected] 1Introduction................................... 73 2 Occurrence and Geographical Distribution .................. 75 2.1 Air........................................ 75 2.1.1ConcentrationsinAir.............................. 75 2.1.2AirDepositionModels............................. 78 2.2 Water....................................... 83 2.2.1SaginawRiver.................................. 83 2.2.2DetroitRiver................................... 84 2.2.3NiagaraRiver.................................. 85 2.3 LakeSediments................................. 86 2.4 RiverandBaySediments............................ 91 2.4.1 Fox River/GreenBaySediments........................ 91 2.4.2LakeSuperiorBaySediments.......................... 91 2.4.3 Saginaw River/SaginawBaySediments.................... 92 2.4.4DetroitRiverSediments............................. 94 2.4.5NiagaraRiverSediments............................ 95 2.5 Fish........................................ 97 2.5.1 Surveys of 2378-TeCDD and 2378-TeCDF . ................ 98 2.5.2ComprehensiveSurveys............................. 103 2.6 SeabirdsandSnappingTurtleEggs...................... 107 2.6.1HerringGullEggs...............................
    [Show full text]
  • A Superfund Solution for an Economic Love Canal
    Pace Law Review Volume 30 Issue 1 Fall 2009 Real Property, Mortgages, and the Economy: A Article 22 Call for Ethics and Reforms September 2009 A Superfund Solution for an Economic Love Canal Mehmet K. Konar-Steenberg William Mitchell College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Mehmet K. Konar-Steenberg, A Superfund Solution for an Economic Love Canal, 30 Pace L. Rev. 310 (2009) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol30/iss1/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Superfund Solution for an Economic Love Canal Mehmet K. Konar-Steenberg* ´7KHUHLVVLPSO\QRJRRGUHDVRQIRUXVWRUHVSRQGWRRQHW\SHRI release of a poison, but not another. The test should not be whether poison was released into river water rather than into well water; or by toxic waste buried in the ground rather than toxic waste discharged to the ground. The test should be whether the poison was released. I assure you that the victim GRHV QRW FDUH WR PDNH WKRVH GLVWLQFWLRQV QRU VKRXOG ZHµ Senator Robert T. Stafford1 Introduction Consider this scenario: A profitable but hazardous LQGXVWU\·V ZRUVW-case risks come to pass. Neighborhoods are boarded-up and residents dislocated. Poor and minority communities are hit particularly hard because they offered the OHDVW UHVLVWDQFH WR WKH LQGXVWU\·V TXHVWLRQDEOH SUDFWLFHV³ practices virtually unregulated by the government and undeterred by the tort system.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline: Love Canal Hazardous Waste Disaster
    Timeline: Love Canal Hazardous Waste Disaster 1892 William T. Love proposed construction of a manmade canal that would ultimately link the Niagara River to Lake Ontario, providing water and hydroelectric power for the model industrial city. 1942 Hooker Chemical and Plastics Corporation began dumping chemical wastes at the Love Canal, and by 1952 had dumped nearly 22,000 tons of chemical waste into the canal. 1953 Hooker Chemical and Plastics Corporation sold the Love Canal property (approximately 15 acres) for $1.00 to the Board of Education of Niagara Falls with a deed disclaimer of responsibility for any future damages due to the presence of buried chemicals. 1955 Board of Education of Niagara Falls completed construction on and opened the 99th Street Elementary School and sold unused sections of the Love Canal property to home developers to build residences. 1976–1977 The Niagara Gazette (and reporter Michael H. Brown) in a series of articles reported that chemical residues from the Love Canal landfill between 97th and 99th Streets have been seeping into the basements of homes in the area. These reports cited illnesses and injuries to residents and pets and destruction of plant life. The newspaper urged prompt government action. 1978 New York State Health Commissioner (Dr. Robert Whalen) began health studies of the Love Canal community (house-to-house collecting of blood samples, levels of toxic vapors, and medical exams and studies of residents) that subsequently confirmed that a serious public health hazard existed. New York Health Department officials met with Love Canal residents and explained the hazards of exposure to toxic chemicals in and around homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Love Canal 1
    L O V E C A N A L Center for Health, Environment and Justice P.O. Box 6806, Falls Church, Virginia 22040 Voice: 703-237-2249 - Email: [email protected] - Website: www.chej.org Fact Pack P001 Cover photo: Lois Gibbs and daughter Melissa 1979 For more information or to order copies of this publication contact: Center for Health, Environment and Justice P.O. Box 6806, Falls Church, Virginia 22040 Voice: 703-237-2249 - Email: [email protected] - Website: www.chej.org TABLE OF CONTENTS A History of Love Canal 1 Love Canal Homeowners Association 2 A Summary of Events 4 Remedial Construction Outside the Fence Community Health Studies 6 Miscarriages and Crib Deaths Birth Defects Nervous Breakdowns Urinary Tract Disorders Combined Health Disorders Key Dates of Events at Love Canal 13 Biography of Lois Gibbs 17 Formation of Center For Health, Environment and Justice 19 News Clips and Articles on Love Canal 20 Love Canal A HISTORY OF LOVE CANAL The history of Love Canal began in 1892 Homebuilding around the old canal also when William T. Love proposed connecting began in the 1950’s. However, homeowners the upper and lower Niagara River by were never given any warning or informa- digging a canal six to seven miles long. By tion that would indicate that the property was doing this, Love hoped to harness the water located near a chemical waste dump. Most of the upper Niagara River into a navigable families who moved into the area were channel, which would create a man-made unaware of the old landfill and its poisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Love Canal Superfund Site City of Niagara Falls Niagara County, New York
    Five-Year Review Report Love Canal Superfund Site City of Niagara Falls Niagara County, New York Prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency September 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the second five-year review for the Love Canal Superfund site (Site), located in the City ofNiagara Falls, Niagara County, New York. The primary selected remedies for the Site include the following: I) containment of wastes within the Love Canal landfill (LeL) via capping, leachate collection and treatment and long-tenn operation, maintenance and monitoring (OM&M) and 2) excavation, treatment and off-site disposal ofcontamination found in surrounding properties, sewers, creeks and other wastes. Nannal residential use is allowed for properties located within Areas 4 through 7 ofthe Emergency Declaration Area (EDA), surrounding the fenced LeL. Properties in the EDA Areas 1 through 3 are suitable for commercial or light industrial use. Based upon the results of this review, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency concludes that the remedies implemented at this Site adequately control exposures of Site contaminants to human and environmental receptors to the extent necessary for the protection ofhuman health and the environment. The continued OM&M at the Site ensures that there are no exposures of Site-related hazardous materials to human or environmental receptors. II Five-Year Review Summary Form Site name (from WasteLAN): love Canal EPA 10 (from WasteLAN): NYD000606947 NPL status: 0 Final • Deleted 0 Other (specify) Remediation status (choose all that
    [Show full text]
  • OBG PRESENTS: Love Canal – History & Observations David J
    OBG PRESENTS: Love Canal – History & Observations David J. Wilson CIH (1979-2012) October 2016 AGENDA History to 1978 Events 1978 to 1985 Remedial Actions Habitability Studies Health Studies Repopulation Personal Observations Reflections 2 Love Canal History to 1978 3 Niagara Falls, NY William T. Love 1890s Power Canal Canal 3,000 feet long, 100 feet wide, & 22 feet deep Canal dug 1,500 feet from Niagara River Project abandoned ~1900 Used for recreation until the 1940s Hooker Chemical, US Military & City of NF used canal for waste disposal from 1943 to 1953 21,800 Tons chemical waste 4 Sold by Hooker for $1, 1953 NF & NF Board with written restrictions of Education requested Soil cover placed on canal • Warning about buried chemicals title to property • DO NOT build on or next to the canal Love Canal Tier 1 total of 99 homes Three blocks (Tier 1) 99th Street School build on first and third blocks History… constructed directly 1954 on middle block around canal •230 Adults •134 Children 1953 to 1972 1972 - Tier 1-4 Residential structures completed •800 Single family homes •240 Low income apartments 5 Tier 1-4 EDA Location Map 6 First & Second Blocks of Love Canal 7 First Block of Love Canal 8 Mid 1970s Odors detected from canal Canal cover soils sinking Sheens on house basement sump water surfaces Drums surfacing in canal area 1976 Calspan Corp. conducts survey and recommendations: LOVE CANAL HISTORY . Place a clay cap on canal fill area . Seal house basement sumps . Install tile drainage along canal 9 Love Canal Events 1978 – 1985 10 April 1978 NF Newspaper article series on hazardous wastes LC Residents express concern to NYSDOH NYSDOH confirms public health hazard at LC May 1978 NYSDOH meets with LC residents NYSDOH issues first of three orders LOVE CANALLOVE EVENTS .
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, Tuesday, January 7, 1958 TITLE 5
    VOLUME 23 NUMBER 4 Wanted Washington, Tuesday, January 7, 1958 TITLE 5— ADMINISTRATIVE R egister publication of July 30, 1957 (22 CONTENTS F. R. 5980) for an additional period of PERSONNEL time until October 16, 1957 for comment. Agricultural Marketing Service pas® Chapter I— Civil Service Commission This period was again extended by Rules and regulations: F ederal R egister publication of Novem­ Lemons, California and Ari­ Part 6—Exceptions F rom the ber 7, 1957 (22 F. R. 8961) to November Competitive Service zona; limitation of handling. 103 23, 1957. U. S. standards for grades : DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including the pro­ Shrimp, frozen raw breaded. 99 Effective upon publication in the F ed­ posal set forth in the aforesaid notice, Strawberries, frozen; correc­ eral Register, paragraph (1) (23) of the following United States Standards tion____ ___ — _________ 102 § 6.310 is amended as set out below. for Grades of Frozen Raw Breaded Agriculture Department § 6.310 Department of the Interior. Shrimp are hereby promulgated pursu­ See Agricultural Marketing Serv­ * * * ant to the authority contained in the ice ; Commodity Stabilization (1) Office of Territories. * * * Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (60 Service. (23) One Confidential Assistant to the Stat. 1087 et seq., as amended; 7 U. S. C. Governor of Guam. 1621 et seq.). Atomic Energy Commission (R. S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; PRODUCT DESCRIPTION, TYPES, AND GRADES Notices: 6 U. S. C. 631,633) Babcock & Wilcox Co. ; proposed Sec. issuance of facility license 119 U nited S tates Civil S erv­ 52.3601 Product description.
    [Show full text]