Official 2012 General Election Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

2012 GENERAL ELECTION - OFFICIAL RESULTS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS GRAND TOTAL Virgil H Goode jr/Jim Clymer American Constitution 50 Barack Obama/Joe Biden Democrat 3,861 Mitt Romney/Paul Ryan Republican 5,235 Gary Johnson/James P Gray Libertarian 141 Jill Stein/Cheri Honkala Green 40 Stewart Alexander/Alex Mendoza Socialist 0 Ross C "Rocky" Anderson/Luis Rodriquez Justice 2 Roseanne Barr/Cindy Lee Sheehan Peace & Freedom 16 James Harris/Alyson Kennedy Socialist Workers 0 Tom Hoefling/Jonathan D Ellis America's 4 Gloria La Riva/Filberto Ramirez Jr Socialism and Liberation 0 Merlin Miller/Harry V Bertram American Third Position 0 Jill Reed/Tom Cary Unaffiliated 10 Thomas Robert Stevens/Alden Link Objectivist 0 Sheila "Samm" Tittle/Matthew A Turner We the People 5 Jerry White/Phyllis Scherrer Socialist Equality 0 Write in Randall Terry/ Missy Reilly Smith 0 REPRESENTATIVE TO THE 113TH US CONGRESS D5 Doug Lamborn Republican 2624 Kenneth R Harvell American Constitution 174 Jim Pirtle Libertarian 380 Misha Luzov Green 463 Dave Anderson Unaffiliated 530 Write in (George Allen Cantrell) 0 REPRESENTATIVE TO THE 113TH US CONGRESS D2 Kevin Lundberg Republican 2510 Jared Polis Democrat 1716 Randy Luallin Libertarian 141 Susan P Hall Green 126 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION CONGRESSIONAL D2 Angelika Schroeder Democrat 1641 Ann Fattor Republican 2370 David G Cottrell Libertarian 342 REGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT LARGE Stephen C Ludwig Democrat 3039 Tyler Belmont American Constitution 370 Brian Davidson Republican 4440 Daniel Ong Libertarian 557 REGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CONGRESSIONAL D5 Gina M Biolchini American Constitution 598 Kyle H Hybl Republican 2360 Steven Hartmann Libertarian 768 STATE REPRESENTATIVE D60 Pier Cohen Democrat 3189 James D (Jim) Wilson Republican 4958 M Bruce Waters Libertarian 489 Write in (Curtis Imrie) 37 DISTRICT ATTORNEY 11TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Thom K LeDoux Republican 6195 COUNTY COMMISSIONER D1 Mike Brazell Republican 6201 COUNTY COMMISSIONER D2 Dick Hodges Republican 6173 JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT Judge Nathan B Coats YES 4666 NO 2653 JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT Judge Laurie A Booras YES 4701 NO 2521 JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT Judge James S Casebolt YES 4731 NO 2430 JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT Judge Dennis A Graham YES 4457 NO 2690 JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT Judge Gale T Miller YES 4544 NO 2623 JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT Judge Daniel Marc Taubman YES 4620 NO 2527 JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT Judge John R Webb YES 4598 NO 2555 JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT Judge Charles M Barton YES 4771 NO 2438 AMENDMENT S (Constitutional) YES 4219 NO 4262 AMENDMENT 64 (Constitutional) YES 5395 NO 3847 AMENDMENT 65 (Constitutional) YES 6634 NO 2280.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Dominion Voting Systems Ballot
Official General Election Ballot Ballot Style: PRE002 Dolores County, Colorado Precinct: 3065817002 - 1 Ballot Type: 1 Tuesday, November 3, 2020 Clerk and Recorder Please vote your mail ballot. Due to COVID-19, help us make this a safe election for everyone by returning this ballot via mail or drop box. Instructions To vote for a named candidate, completely fill in To vote for an eligible write-in candidate, To make a correction, draw a bold line through the oval to the left of your choice. Use blue or completely fill in the oval to the left of the write-in the oval and candidate name marked by black ink. line, and print the name of the candidate on the mistake. Then, completely fill in the oval next to line. the correct name. WARNING: Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an eligible elector to vote in any particular manner or to refrain from voting, or who falsely makes, alters, forges or counterfeits any mail ballot before or after it has been cast, or who destroys, defaces, mutilates, or tampers with a ballot is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment, or to a fine, or both. Section 1-7.5-107(3)(b), C.R.S. Federal Offices State Offices Presidential Electors State Board of Education Member - (Vote for One Pair) Congressional District 3 (Vote for One) Joseph R. Biden / Kamala D. Harris Democratic Donald J. Trump / Michael R. Pence Republican Mayling Simpson Democratic Don Blankenship / William Mohr American Constitution Joyce Rankin Republican Bill Hammons / Eric Bodenstab Unity State Representative - District 58 (Vote for One) Howie Hawkins / Angela Nicole Walker Green Blake Huber / Frank Atwood Approval Voting Seth Cagin Democratic Jo Jorgensen / Jeremy "Spike" Cohen Libertarian Marc Catlin Republican Brian Carroll / Amar Patel American Solidarity District Attorney - 22nd Judicial District Mark Charles / Adrian Wallace Unaffiliated (Vote for One) Phil Collins / Billy Joe Parker Prohibition Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente / Darcy G.
[Show full text]
Amended Canvass Ofresults General Election November 6, 2012
STATE OF ALABAMA Amended Canvass ofResults General Election November 6, 2012 Pursua:lt to Chapter 14 of Title 17 of the Code of Alabama, 1975, we, the undersigned, hereby am\~nd the canvass of results certified on November 28, 2012, for the General Election for the offices of President of the United States and Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court held in Alabama on Tuesday, November 6, 2012, and to incorporate the write-in votes reported by Wilcox County in said election. The amended canvass shows the correct tabulation of votes to be as recorded on the following pages. In Testimony Whereby, I have hereunto set my hand and affIxed the Great and Principal Seal of the State of Alal:>ama at the State Capitol, in the City nf Montgomery, on this the 17th day of December, in the year 2012 Governor Attorney General ~an~ Secretary of State FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA / Min ROMNEY / VIRGIL H. GOODE, JR. / GARY JOHNSON / JILL STEIN / JOE BIDEN (D) PAUL RYAN (R) JAMES CLYMER (I) JIM GRAY (I) CHERI HONKALA (I) WI Total Vote County Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Autauga 6,363 17,379 31 137 22 41 23,973 Baldwin 18,424 66,016 122 607 169 153 85,491 Barbour 5,912 5,550 9 32 6 8 11,517 Bibb 2,202 6,132 13 38 9 26 8,420 Blount 2,970 20,757 59 170 50 54 24,060 Bullock 4,061 1,251 4 3 3 5,322 Butler 4,374 5,087 9 20 6 6 9,502 Calhoun 15,511 30,278 85 291 92 107 46,364 Chambers 6,871 7,626 21 78 15 18 14,629 Cherokee 2,132 7,506 36 79 26 13 9,792 Chilton 3,397
[Show full text]
Unreasonable Access: Disguised Issue Advocacy and the First Amendment Status of Broadcasters
[WORKING DRAFT-FESC CONFERENCE, MAY 2014 PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE] UNREASONABLE ACCESS: DISGUISED ISSUE ADVOCACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT STATUS OF BROADCASTERS Kerry L. Monroe* Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1! I. Candidate Political Broadcasting Rights ............................................................ 8! A. History and Purposes of Statutory Political Broadcasting Rights ............... 9! 1.! Equal Opportunities for Candidates for Elective Office .................... 10! 2.! Reasonable Access and Lowest Unit Rate ......................................... 11! B. Regulatory Implementation of Reasonable Access ..................................... 13! C. Court Consideration of the Constitutionality of Reasonable Access .......... 15! II. Gaming the System—Pretextual Candidates ..................................................... 20! A. Incentives to Game the System ................................................................... 20! B. FCC Tolerance of Pretextual Candidates .................................................... 23! III. Walking the Tightrope of Broadcast Regulation .............................................. 28! A. Pursuing Communications Policy Through Structural Regulation ............. 28! 1.! The Origin of Congress’s Regulatory Power over Broadcast ........... 29! 2.! Regulating Broadcast to Pursue Communications Policy ................. 35! B. Reasonable Access and the Means-Ends Fit of the Commission’s Prophylactic
[Show full text]
Gary Johnson Warns Political Establishment: Libertarians
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. • 1444 Duke St. • Alexandria, VA 22314 • Phone: (202) 333-0008 • Fax: (202) 333-0072 www.LP.org July 2016 Gary Johnson warns political establishment: Libertarians ‘disrupting the two-party duopoly’ by Jennnifer Harper Excerpted from the Washington Times are, indeed, saying, ‘I’m in,’” says Mr. Johnson, who ran for Published on July 6, 2016 the White House in 2012 and snagged 1.2 million votes with a minimum of public outreach. he Libertarian Party made a big noise in the nation’s cap- Times have changed since then. The Johnson–Weld cam- Tital [this week]. Libertarian presidential nominee Gary paign has [a] formal fundraising apparatus in place, a spiffy Johnson and his running mate, Bill Weld, descended on the new video, and a full calendar of public appearances. A Morn- National Press Club for a sold-out public event broadcast ing Consult poll released [on July 5] found Mr. Johnson with live on C-SPAN. The two former governors outlined — very 11 percent of the vote; Mr. Trump garnered 37 percent; Mrs. clearly — why their third-party effort is more likely to suc- Clinton, 38 percent. The Libertarian candidate, however, has ceed this year than in past elections. Persistent voter disen- his eye fixed on 15 percent — which would qualify him to chantment with establishment politics is a significant factor. participate in the sanctioned, nationally televised presiden- “We are becoming factors in the presidential campaign tial debates, just over two months off. that can no longer be ignored. We are already disrupting the “The key is to reach 15 percent consistently in these major two-party duopoly — and neither Donald Trump nor Hillary national polls.
[Show full text]
What Happened?: the 2020 Election Showed That Libertarians Have a Long Way to Go Before They Can Become a Page 1 of 4 National Movement
USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog: What Happened?: The 2020 election showed that libertarians have a long way to go before they can become a Page 1 of 4 national movement. What Happened?: The 2020 election showed that libertarians have a long way to go before they can become a national movement. In the 2020 presidential election, the Libertarian Party candidate, Jo Jorgensen, gained 1.2 percent of the vote, less than half the party’s 2016 election result. Jeffrey Michels and Olivier Lewis write that despite signs that pointed towards the potential for libertarian voters to be king makers in the 2020 election, their dislike of Donald Trump turned many to Joe Biden and the Democratic Party. Following the 2020 US General Election, our mini-series, ‘What Happened?’, explores aspects of elections at the presidential, Senate, House of Representative and state levels, and also reflects on what the election results will mean for US politics moving forward. If you are interested in contributing, please contact Rob Ledger ([email protected]) or Peter Finn ([email protected]). In the 2016 US Presidential election, the former Republican Governor of New Mexico, Gary Johnson gained 3.3 percent of the national vote share, the highest on record for a Libertarian Party presidential candidate. This modest milestone could have been written off as the result of a race featuring two highly unpopular mainstream candidates, Donald Trump and former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. But it might also have portended a more meaningful movement in US electoral politics, one in which a growing Libertarian Party – or at least an increasingly independent bloc of libertarian voters – gains the critical mass to tip the race.
[Show full text]
Minutes Ed Read Minutes, Mike Skelly Seconded and They Were Approved
March 17, 2012 GPNJ Convention 9:45 Convention called to order by Mike Spector. Mike addressed the convention. He encouraged us to obtain signatures for Ken Wolski’s senate run. Only 50 signatures are needed for House Races this year. Ballot Issue Nick pointed out we need Freeholder candidates to get a ballot line on left side of ballot instead of on far right. Jill Stein Speech Introduction Jill Stein was introduced by her campaign manager and spoke on struggles in Wisconsin to overcome Governor Walker’s policies and the Chamber of Commerce Jill is homegrown and recruited into GP. Jill is speaking all over the country to get signatures. For ballot access and increase awareness of GP. Jill is seeking denotations for her campaign to obtain federal matching funds. She needs $5,000 in 20 states raised by contributions of $250 or less. If 20 people give $250, then NJ has qualified. Almost half in NJ have done so already. She is reaching ballot access in 48 states. Jill’s Speech There is hope for 3rd party. Democratic movements. Obama is supporting the wrong policies, just as the Republicans are. Jill emphasized the importance of giving people a choice and not having to vote for corporate rule. Jill’s would have communities make decisions on how to implement a Green New Deal. She spoke of the NDAA act which did away of right to trial and HR 347 that can criminalize protest by having ground demonstrations declared national security land protestors made felons. She called for a Voter bill of rights, IRV (rank choice), and proportional representation.
[Show full text]
Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign
45 Recognizing the Rhetorics of Feminist Action: Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein’s 2012 Green Party Campaign Virginia Crisco Abstract: Scholars such as Nancy Welch and Susan Jarratt argue that Neoliberalism shapes how everyday citizens are able to take action. Using what Jacquelyn Jones Royster and Gesa Kirsch call “social circulation,” I analyze how Dr. Jill Stein, the presidential candidate for the Green Party in 2012, used “whatever spaces are left” to challenge the dominant two party system, particularly in relation to the pres- idential debates. I argue that Stein demonstrates an activist literacy disposition that positions her to use the spaces, the literate and rhetorical means, and oppor- tunities for storytelling to foster social action in our neoliberal climate. Keywords: neoliberalism, social circulation, activist literacy, third party politics In Living Room: Teaching Public Writing in a Privatized World, Nancy Welch argues that neoliberalism has changed not only the topics available for public discussion in the pursuit of making socio-political change, but the venues for having those discussions, as they have also become increasingly privatized. As an example, Welch refects on her experiences advocating for her husband’s health care to their insurance company. She describes the multiple letters she had gotten from her insurance company saying their appeal for his care had been denied, using the same phrases again and again, as if her carefully re- searched and rhetorical letters were not even being read. This leads Welch to question the amount of power we as teachers and scholars of writing give to language and rhetoric: These are rhetorical strategies that, mostly in the abstract, have given me comfort – comfort in the belief that I really can wield power in language, that I can empower my students, particularly those subor- dinate by gender, race, sexuality, and class, to do the same.
[Show full text]
Protests Say: Abortion Is a Woman's Right to Choose!
· AUSTRALIA $1.50 · CANADA $1.25 · FRANCE 1.00 EURO · NEW ZEALAND $1.50 · SWEDEN KR10 · UK £.50 · U.S. $1.00 INSIDE How attempts to shut abortion clinics were defeated in early ’90s — PAGE 9 A SOCIALIST NEWSWEEKLY PUBLISHED IN THE INTERESTS OF WORKING PEOPLE VOL. 73/NO. 23 JUNE 15, 2009 Washington Protests say: abortion is a seeks new sanctions woman’s right to choose! Vigils condemn killing of clinic doctor in Kansas on N. Korea BY TED LEONARD BY BEN Joyce AND MAGGIE TROWE The U.S. government and its impe- WICHITA, Kansas—Just hours af- rialist allies have condemned a recent ter Dr. George Tiller was shot to death, nuclear test and missile launches by about 400 people joined a candlelight North Korea. Washington and Tokyo vigil here May 31 to protest his killing are pressing for a UN resolution to and defend a woman’s right to choose impose more punitive sanctions and abortion. other measures against the country In nearby Lawrence 150 people for daring to challenge their dictates. participated in a similar vigil that Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to night. In the days following the doc- the United Nations, said June 1 that tor’s death, similar events took place the UN Security Council was “mak- throughout Kansas and the Midwest, ing progress” in coming up with a and across the country. new resolution that may involve new sanctions on North Korea. A partial MOBILIZE TO DEFEND draft of the resolution obtained by the Associated Press May 29 calls on WOMEN’S RIGHT TO CHOOSE! all governments “immediately to en- Editorial —p.
[Show full text]
The Rules of #Metoo
University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2019 Article 3 2019 The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Jessica A. (2019) "The Rules of #MeToo," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2019 , Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke† ABSTRACT Two revelations are central to the meaning of the #MeToo movement. First, sexual harassment and assault are ubiquitous. And second, traditional legal procedures have failed to redress these problems. In the absence of effective formal legal pro- cedures, a set of ad hoc processes have emerged for managing claims of sexual har- assment and assault against persons in high-level positions in business, media, and government. This Article sketches out the features of this informal process, in which journalists expose misconduct and employers, voters, audiences, consumers, or professional organizations are called upon to remove the accused from a position of power. Although this process exists largely in the shadow of the law, it has at- tracted criticisms in a legal register. President Trump tapped into a vein of popular backlash against the #MeToo movement in arguing that it is “a very scary time for young men in America” because “somebody could accuse you of something and you’re automatically guilty.” Yet this is not an apt characterization of #MeToo’s paradigm cases.
[Show full text]
Marquette Law School Poll – August 4-7, 2016
Marquette Law School Poll – August 4-7, 2016 S1. May I please speak with the (male/female) adult member of your household, currently at home, age 18 or older, with the most recent birthday? (IF SELECTED RESPONDENT NOT CURRENTLY AT HOME AND AVAILABLE, ASK FOR THE (FEMALE/MALE) CURRENTLY AT HOME.) 1 Correct household member on phone (CONTINUE) 2 Will put correct member of household on phone (RE-READ INTRO AND CONTINUE WITH S2.) 3 No household member age 18 or over is currently available (PLACE HOUSEHOLD INTO CALLBACK) 4 No one in household age 18 or older (TERMINATE) S2. Record Gender: (DO NOT ASK. RECORD ONLY ONE RESPONSE) 1 Male 2 Female **Author note: If respondent in overquota, go to overquota/callback script and have interviewer place respondent in specified callback for future day.** S3a. Do you currently live in Wisconsin? 1 Yes 2 No (TERMINATE) S3b. In what county in Wisconsin do you live? ___________________________________ **Author note: Insert county list on screen.** **Author note: If respondent lives in Milwaukee County or County is Don’t Know/Other, continue to S4. If respondent lives in any Wisconsin county besides Milwaukee, place in appropriate quota group and skip to S5. If over quota, thank and terminate.** S4. Do you currently live within Milwaukee city limits? (RECORD ONE ANSWER) 1 Yes (Milwaukee City quota group) 2 No (Milwaukee DMA quota group) S5. Some people are registered to vote and others are not. Are you registered to vote in the precinct or ward where you now live, or aren't you? 1 Yes, Registered to Vote (SKIP TO Q.1) 2 No, Not Registered to Vote (ASK S6) (DO NOT READ) 9 No Answer/Don't Know/Refused (ASK S6) ** Author note: If 2 or 9 in S5 ask S6** S6.
[Show full text]
2016 General Election Results
Cumulative Report — Official Douglas County, Colorado — 2016 General Election — November 08, 2016 Page 1 of 9 11/22/2016 09:59 AM Total Number of Voters : 192,617 of 241,547 = 79.74% Precincts Reporting 0 of 157 = 0.00% Party Candidate Early Election Total Presidential Electors, Vote For 1 DEM Hillary Clinton / Tim Kaine 68,657 36.62% 0 0.00% 68,657 36.62% REP Donald J. Trump / Michael R. Pence 102,573 54.71% 0 0.00% 102,573 54.71% AMC Darrell L. Castle / Scott N. Bradley 695 0.37% 0 0.00% 695 0.37% LIB Gary Johnson / Bill Weld 10,212 5.45% 0 0.00% 10,212 5.45% GRE Jill Stein / Ajamu Baraka 1,477 0.79% 0 0.00% 1,477 0.79% APV Frank Atwood / Blake Huber 15 0.01% 0 0.00% 15 0.01% AMD "Rocky" Roque De La Fuente / Michael 45 0.02% 0 0.00% 45 0.02% Steinberg PRO James Hedges / Bill Bayes 7 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 0.00% AMR Tom Hoefling / Steve Schulin 37 0.02% 0 0.00% 37 0.02% VOA Chris Keniston / Deacon Taylor 253 0.13% 0 0.00% 253 0.13% SW Alyson Kennedy / Osborne Hart 13 0.01% 0 0.00% 13 0.01% IA Kyle Kenley Kopitke / Nathan R. Sorenson 64 0.03% 0 0.00% 64 0.03% KFP Laurence Kotlikoff / Edward Leamer 29 0.02% 0 0.00% 29 0.02% SAL Gloria Estela La Riva / Dennis J. Banks 10 0.01% 0 0.00% 10 0.01% Bradford Lyttle / Hannah Walsh 13 0.01% 0 0.00% 13 0.01% Joseph Allen Maldonado / Douglas K.
[Show full text]
September October 2011 Interior
Real History BRINGING HISTORY INTO ACCORD WITH THE FACTS IN THE TRADITION OF DR. HARRY ELMER BARNES is the stuff of mystery and intrigue, The Barnes Review romance and tragedy, cowardice and courage, good and evil . A JOURNAL OF NATIONALIST THOUGHT & HISTORY eal history is not propaganda intended to shape the views of unsuspecting readers toward the VOLUME XVIII NUMBER 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2012 BARNESREVIEW.COM current projects of the masters of the $46 per Rmedia. Unfortunately, Americans share a year in vast ignorance of the past and, as such, are easily manipulated by the special interest elite. U.S. Real history is more than the distorted, liberal, politically correct lies or half-truths you get in virtually every other periodical published today. Real history is the A Straight Look stuff of mystery and intrigue, romance and tragedy, cowardice and courage, conspiracy and idealism, good and evil. In THE BARNES REVIEW, you will read vignettes of Man, from the prehistoric to the very recent; from forgotten races and civilizations to first person accounts of World War II at the Second and the late Cold War. There is no more interesting Real magazine published today, nor a more significant history and important subject than REAL history. in every Our purpose—to bring history into accord with World War the facts—was first enunciated by our namesake, Dr. issue Harry Elmer Barnes. It was he who began the crusade to accomplish this noble goal. No cause is more important to the survival of civilization. Inside this special issue: Your subscription to THE BARNES REVIEW supports this vital work that is needed today to prevent the otherwise inevitable day • The disaster that was WWII when the purposeful distortion of history produces its certain result—the nightmare tyranny dreamt of by Orwell.
[Show full text]