DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association A U S T R A L A S I A N TAX TEACHERS ASSOCIATION JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALASIAN TAX TEACHERS ASSOCIATION 2016 Vol.11 No.1 Edited by DALE BOCCABELLA and ANN KAYIS-KUMAR The Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association (‘JATTA’) is a double blind, peer reviewed journal. The Journal is normally published annually, subsequent to the Association’s annual conference. The Australasian Tax Teachers Association (‘ATTA’) is a non‐profit organisation established in 1987 with the goal of improving the standard of tax teaching in educational institutions across Australasia. Our members include tax academics, writers, and administrators from Australia and New Zealand. For more information about ATTA refer to our website (hosted by ATAX at the University of New South Wales) at www.asb.unsw.edu.au/schools/taxationandbusinesslaw/atta. Please direct your enquiries regarding the Journal to the Editor‐in‐Chief: Professor Dale Pinto Professor of Taxation Law School of Business Law and Taxation Curtin University GPO BOX U1987 Perth WA 6845 E: [email protected] Editorial Board of the Journal of Australasian Tax Teachers Association: Professor Dale Pinto, Curtin University, Perth, Australia (Editor‐in‐Chief) Professor Neil Brooks, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto, Canada Professor Margaret McKerchar, UNSW, Sydney, Australia Professor John Prebble, Victoria University of Wellington, NZ Professor Kerrie Sadiq Queensland University of Technology, Australia Professor Adrian Sawyer, University of Canterbury, NZ Professor Miranda Stewart, Australian National University, Australia Professor Natalie Stoianoff, University of Technology Sydney, Australia Associate Professor Andrew Smith, Victoria University, NZ Associate Professor Paul Kenny, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia ISSN: 1832–911X Volume 11 Number 1 published December 2016 Copyright © 2016 Australasian Tax Teachers Association Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association 2016 Vol. 11 No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD DALE BOCCABELLA AND ANN KAYIS‐KUMAR .................................................................................................................. iii SOME COMMENTS ON THE ROLE OF A REVIEWER (REFEREE) OF AN ARTICLE DALE BOCCABELLA ................................................................................................................................................................ iv THE EVOLUTION OF THE APPROACH OF THE NEW ZEALAND COURTS TO TAX AVOIDANCE THE HON JUSTICE WILLIAM YOUNG................................................................................................................................... 1 TAX AND TIME TRAVEL: LOOKING BACK AND LOOKING FORWARD – A TAX ADMINISTRATOR’S PERSPECTIVE JAN FARRELL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 27 IS THE CITIZEN‐CONSUMER THE FUTURE TAXPAYER? JONATHAN BARRETT ........................................................................................................................................................... 57 UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AND TAX LITERACY: OPPORTUNITIES AND LESSONS FOR TAX TEACHING TONI CHARDON, CHRISANN LEE, LAURA DE ZWAAN, YULIN LIU ................................................................................ 85 EMERGENCE, GROWTH AND MOBILITY OF EUROPEAN COMPETENCE ON DIRECT TAX REGIME: AN ANALYTICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY REVIEW SHAFI U KHAN NIAZI .......................................................................................................................................................... 103 A REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON CORPORATE TAX AGGRESSIVENESS AND THE LEVERAGE PUZZLE H KHIEM (JONATHAN) NGUYEN ....................................................................................................................................... 139 i [This page is blank intentionally] Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association 2016 Vol. 11 No. 1 FOREWORD The papers included in this edition of the Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association (JATTA) were presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association (ATTA). The ATTA conference was held from 20 to 22 January 2016 and hosted by the School of Taxation & Business Law, UNSW Business School. The theme of the conference was ‘Tax and Time Travel: Looking Backwards and Looking Forwards’. Many of the papers at the conference and in JATTA 2016 focused on this theme, but some also dealt with other important issues relating to tax policy, tax design and tax administration. We hope that the papers published here will make a significant contribution to the literature on the diverse range of topics they deal with. Plenary presentations and dinner speeches at the ATTA conference were given by Professor Diane Ring, Boston College Law School; Greg Smith, Chairman of the Commonwealth Grants Commission; Jan Farrell, former Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Taxation Office (ATO); Andrew Mills, Second Commissioner of the ATO; The Honourable Justice William Young KNZM, Judge of the Supreme Court of New Zealand; Ross Gittins, Economics Editor of The Sydney Morning Herald; and the Patron of ATTA, Professor Gordon Cooper. We would like to thank Editor‐in‐Chief, Professor Dale Pinto and ATTA President, Professor Adrian Sawyer for their guidance and support. Thank you also to all authors that submitted an article to JATTA 2016. We also thank the reviewers of articles for their contribution. We would especially like to thank two reviewers (who unfortunately must remain anonymous) for ‘coming to the rescue’ at short notice and providing invaluable feedback that contributed to JATTA 2016. Finally, a big thank you goes to Trischa Mann for her dedication to the copyediting task for JATTA 2016. She has now worked on JATTA since 2014. Dale Boccabella and Ann Kayis‐Kumar School of Taxation & Business Law, UNSW 15 December 2016 iii Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association 2016 Vol. 11 No. 1 SOME COMMENTS ON THE ROLE OF A REVIEWER (REFEREE) OF AN ARTICLE Inspired by others, I briefly set out my thoughts or suggestions on how a reviewer (referee) could approach the task of reviewing an article for a peer‐reviewed tax journal – or any journal. These comments may help those who have not reviewed many articles, and it may help practitioner reviewers as well. The comments are also designed to get us, as a scholarly community, thinking about this issue and other issues related to the peer review process. The comments cannot be taken to be exhaustive.* The role of the reviewer is very important in the ‘machine’ that is the publication of peer‐ reviewed articles. To be asked to review an article by an editor is an honour. It usually reflects the attainment of some standing or knowledge in a disciplinary area, and is a concrete indication that the editor is putting some faith or trust in the person to assist with the editor’s all‐important question of ‘to publish’ or ‘not to publish’. Obviously, this is very important to the author of the article, but also the journal itself. From editors’ extensive knowledge, they will usually have a reasonable idea of the suitability of a particular person for a reviewing task. However, editors cannot always know how well equipped a potential reviewer is to review an article. Accordingly, it is incumbent on reviewers, when approached, to ask themselves whether they can effectively review an article. In this regard, I suggest to both a reviewer and editors, as part of the ‘sounding out process’, that the person approached to be a reviewer be given 4–6 days to ‘scan read’ the article, and from that reading, make a judgment as to whether he/she can effectively review the article. This process should give editors more confidence in the reviewer, and it can also allow for better planning for the journal. If the person approached cannot review the article, the editor can move onto another potential reviewer quickly, and not face the risk of discovering ‘an unsuitable reviewer’ 6–7 weeks later (when a first read may be made). All journals for which I have reviewed articles (mostly tax journals) work on the basis that the reviewer does not know who the author is, and the author does not know who the reviewer is; some call this double‐blind reviewing. When reading an article, reviewers may be tempted to give some thought to the identity of the author. For me, you must try very hard not to focus on author identification; your focus should be on the piece of work. If you are convinced you know who the author is, you have an obligation to let the editor know, so the editor can make a judgment about what to do. Presumably the editor will want to be convinced that you can approach the task in a strictly objective manner. (I once inadvertently established the author’s identity, but the editor decided to keep me on). On the decision to review or not, it is true that there is currently no direct financial reward for reviewing an article. And, from what I can gather, my university (and I suspect others in Australia) does not attach any particular significance to being a reviewer. That said, many institutions will consider reviewing as an important service item, and in New Zealand it would be valuable to include in a Performance‐Based Research Fund evidence portfolio. Accepting for a minute that low importance is attached to reviewing, you may ask, why should I bother? In short, it is a service to your discipline, and if every academic said
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Australian Government's NCP Annual Report for the Period 1 July
    Australian Government National Competition Policy Annual Report 2004-05 © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN 0 642 74327 4 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney General’s Department Robert Garran Offices National Circuit CANBERRA ACT 2600 Or posted at: http://www.ag.gov.au/cca A copy of this document appears on the Treasury website: http://www.treasury.gov.au Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. ix Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The importance of competition policy for Australia ................................................................... 1 National Competition Policy framework .................................................................................... 3 Public interest test ....................................................................................................................6 The need for safeguards...........................................................................................................7 The Australian Government’s reporting requirement ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Report
    Australia’s Automotive Productivity Commission Manufacturing Industry Inquiry Report No. 70, 31 March 2014 Commonwealth of Australia 2014 ISSN 978-1-74037-478-1 ISBN 1447-1329 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the work may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Reproduction for commercial use or sale requires prior written permission from the Productivity Commission. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Media and Publications (see below). This publication is available from the Productivity Commission website at www.pc.gov.au. If you require part or all of this publication in a different format, please contact Media and Publications. Publications enquiries: Media and Publications Productivity Commission Locked Bag 2 Collins Street East Melbourne VIC 8003 Tel: (03) 9653 2244 Fax: (03) 9653 2303 Email: [email protected] General enquiries: Tel: (03) 9653 2100 or (02) 6240 3200 An appropriate citation for this paper is: Productivity Commission 2014, Australia’s Automotive Manufacturing Industry, Inquiry Report No. 70, Canberra. JEL code: L620 The Productivity Commission The Productivity Commission is the Australian Government’s independent research and advisory body on a range of economic, social and environmental issues affecting the welfare of Australians. Its role, expressed most simply, is to help governments make better policies, in the long term interest of the Australian community. The Commission’s independence is underpinned by an Act of Parliament. Its processes and outputs are open to public scrutiny and are driven by concern for the wellbeing of the community as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Committee Hansard
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Official Committee Hansard SENATE ECONOMICS LEGISLATION COMMITTEE ESTIMATES (Supplementary Budget Estimates) THURSDAY, 22 OCTOBER 2009 CANBERRA BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE INTERNET Hansard transcripts of public hearings are made available on the inter- net when authorised by the committee. The internet address is: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard To search the parliamentary database, go to: http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au Thursday, 22 October 2009 Senate E 1 SENATE ECONOMICS LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Thursday, 22 October 2009 Members: Senator Hurley (Chair), Senator Eggleston (Deputy Chair), Senators Cameron, Joyce, Pratt and Xenophon Participating members: Senators Abetz, Adams, Back, Barnett, Bernardi, Bilyk, Birming- ham, Mark Bishop, Boswell, Boyce, Brandis, Bob Brown, Carol Brown, Bushby, Cash, Col- beck, Jacinta Collins, Coonan, Cormann, Crossin, Farrell, Feeney, Ferguson, Fielding, Fierra- vanti-Wells, Fifield, Fisher, Forshaw, Furner, Hanson-Young, Heffernan, Humphries, Hurley, Hutchins, Johnston, Kroger, Ludlam, Lundy, Ian Macdonald, McEwen, McGauran, McLucas, Marshall, Mason, Milne, Minchin, Moore, Nash, O’Brien, Parry, Payne, Polley, Ronaldson, Ryan, Scullion, Siewert, Sterle, Troeth, Trood, Williams and Wortley Senators in attendance: Senators Abetz, Boswell, Bushby, Cameron, Coonan, Colbeck, Eggleston, Hurley, Joyce, Ludlam, Parry, Pratt and Xenophon Committee met at 9.01 am TREASURY PORTFOLIO In Attendance Senator Sherry, Assistant Treasurer Department of the Treasury Dr Ken Henry AC, Secretary Outcome 1—Sound
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Paper
    2008-09 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA THE SENATE NOTICE PAPER No. 77 TUESDAY, 11 AUGUST 2009 The Senate meets at 12.30 pm Contents Business of the Senate Notice of Motion .......................................................................................................2 Orders of the Day ......................................................................................................2 Government Business Notice of Motion .......................................................................................................3 Orders of the Day ......................................................................................................3 Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports ..............................................................................................6 General Business Notices of Motion ......................................................................................................7 Orders of the Day relating to Government Documents ................................................9 Orders of the Day .................................................................................................... 10 Business for Future Consideration................................................................................. 17 Bills Referred to Committees ........................................................................................ 24 Bills Discharged or Negatived .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iv. Trade Policies by Sector
    Australia WT/TPR/S/178/Rev.1 Page 73 IV. TRADE POLICIES BY SECTOR (1) OVERVIEW 1. In order to aid transparency and facilitate analysis of the potential impact of government assistance on the allocation of resources between sectors, the Productivity Commission publishes annual estimates of several key types of assistance, using, for example, effective rates of assistance (ERAs).1 Among the main forms of assistance captured by ERAs are: tariff protection; budgetary assistance2; and agricultural pricing and regulation. According to estimates for 2003/04, the latest year for which indicators are available, the ERA was virtually zero for mining, which accounts for around half of merchandise exports and is one of the major driving forces behind Australia's recent strong economic growth. The ERAs for primary production (including agriculture) and manufacturing were low, at only 4.1% and 4.5%, respectively.3 However, these averages mask a significant variation in rates within sectors. At the high end are textiles, clothing and footwear (TCF) and motor vehicles and parts (MVP), with rates of 24.2% and 10.6%, respectively, although these may have fallen as a result of Australia's unilateral reduction in the tariffs for these sectors in 2005. At 12%, the ERA of the dairy industry is also relatively high, albeit significantly lower than prior to its deregulation in 2000.4 For technical reasons, no estimates of ERAs were available for services. 2. The services sector dominates Australia's economy, accounting for nearly two thirds of GDP and roughly three quarters of employment in 2004/05. During the period under review, government assistance to services has been increasing, mainly owing to measures to encourage investment, R&D, and exports.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Electric Vehicles(PDF 2.96
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA Legislative Council Economy and Infrastructure Committee Inquiry into electric vehicles Parliament of Victoria Economy and Infrastructure Committee Ordered to be published VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER May 2018 PP No 377, Session 2014‑18 ISBN 978 1 925703 34 4 (print version) 978 1 925703 35 1 (PDF version) Committee functions The Economy and Infrastructure Standing Committee is established under the Legislative Council Standing Orders Chapter 23 — Council Committees and Sessional Orders. The committee’s functions are to inquire into and report on any proposal, matter or thing concerned with agriculture, commerce, infrastructure, industry, major projects, public sector finances, transport and education. The Economy and Infrastructure Committee (References) may inquire into, hold public hearings, consider and report on other matters that are relevant to its functions. The Economy and Infrastructure Committee (Legislation) may inquire into, hold public hearings, consider and report on any Bills or draft Bills referred by the Legislative Council, annual reports, estimates of expenditure or other documents laid before the Legislative Council in accordance with an Act, provided these are relevant to its functions. Government Departments allocated for oversight: • Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources • Department of Education and Training • Department of Treasury and Finance. ii Economy and Infrastructure Committee Committee membership Mr Bernie Finn MLC Mr Mark Gepp MLC Mr Jeff Bourman MLC
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Tax Profile
    Australia Tax Profile Produced in conjunction with the KPMG Asia Pacific Tax Centre June 2018 1 Table of Contents 1 Corporate Income Tax 3 1.1 General Information 3 1.2 Determination of Taxable Income and Deductible Expenses 7 1.2.1 Income 7 1.2.2 Expenses 8 1.3 Tax Compliance 10 1.4 Financial Statements/Accounting 12 1.5 Incentives 13 1.6 International Taxation 14 2 Transfer Pricing 18 3 Indirect Tax 21 4 Personal Taxation 22 5 Other Taxes 23 6 Trade & Customs 24 6.1 Customs 24 6.2 Free Trade Agreements (FTA) 24 7 Tax Authority 25 © 2018 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. Australia Tax Profile 2 1 Corporate Income Tax 1.1 General Information Corporate Income Tax Corporate income tax is levied at the federal level only. It applies to the company’s taxable income, which is the total of assessable income minus allowable deductions. Tax Rate 30 percent to all companies that are not eligible for the lower company tax rate. Eligibility for the lower company tax rate depends on whether you are a ‘base rate entity’ from the 2017–18 income year. Special rates apply to life insurance companies, non-profit companies and credit unions. From the 2017–18 income year, companies that are base rate entities will be taxed at the lower company tax rate of 27.5 percent. A base rate entity is a company that is carrying on a business and has an aggregated turnover below the turnover threshold (AUD25 million for the 2017–18 income year).
    [Show full text]
  • Imagereal Capture
    Index 24/7 Media Inc., 102 Allgas Energy Ltd, 94 4WD Systems Australia Pty Ltd, 67 Allianz Aust Insurance, 78 4WD Systems Pty Ltd, 67 Alstom Australia Limited, 84, 85 Alston, Senator, 34 alternative health therapy, 87 AAA Tourism Pty Ltd, 98 Ampco Automotive Pty Ltd, 104 ABB Power Transmission Pty Limited, 84, 85 analogue pay-TV services,, 12 ABB Transmission and Distribution Limited, 85 Ancient Order of Foresters (Western Australian District) Friendly Society Limited, 103 ACCC Annual Conference of Economists, 18, 40 implemention of New Tax System, 40 Ansell rubber gloves, 88 publications, 106 Ansett Airways Ltd, 95 ACCC v National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd, 82 Ansonguard Pty Limited, 83 ACCC u Visy Paper Pty Ltd [2001], 83 anti-competitive practices, 66, 82, 83, 84, 85, 104 access arrangement APL. See Australian Pensioners League of Western Australia gas pipeline, 58 APN Newspapers Pty Ltd, 70 Acepark Pty Ltd. See Solutions Software International Pty Ltd Apollo Optical (Aust) Pty Ltd, 73 ACTEW Retail, 96 Architectural Projects Pty Ltd, 79 ActewAG L, 96 Arnotts Biscuits Ltd, 96 Adelaide Airport, 95 Asher, Allan, 1 Adelaide Newspapers Ltd, 95 ASIC. See Australian and Securities Investment Commission adjudication, 75, 93 assertion of right to payment, 89 Administrative Review Council, 13 ASX Operations Pty Ltd, 96 ADSL (asymmetric digital subscriber line), 11 ASX Settlement and Transfer Corporation Pty Ltd, 96 advanced broadband wireless networks, 10 ATTM Card Scheme, 92 Advert, 95 AusBulk Ltd, 96 Advertiser Newspapers Limited, 93, 95 Ausmarkets, 28 Adway Holdings Pty Limited, 87 Australian Baseball Federation, 79 AGL ACT Retail Investments Pty Ltd, 96 Australian Central Credit Union, 103 AGL Electricity Limited, 96 Australian Consumers Association, 1 AGL Energy Sales & Marketing Limited, 96 Australian Cooperative Foods Ltd, 85 AGL Retail Energy Limited, 96 Australian Dairy Farmers Federation Ltd, 95 AGL South Australia Pty Limited, 96 Australian Design Award, 96 Agsafe, 93 ACCC Journal No.
    [Show full text]
  • 117139 Suncorp-Metway Intro.Qxp
    OFFERING CIRCULAR IN RELATION TO MEDIUM TERM NOTES 16 JUNE 2009 SUNCORP-METWAY LIMITED (ABN 66 010 831 722) (Incorporated with limited liability in Australia) U.S.$15,000,000,000 Programme for the issuance of Medium Term Notes, Euro-commercial Paper and other debt instruments On 26 September 2001 Suncorp-Metway Limited (the “Issuer” or “Suncorp”) entered into a U.S.$ 7,500,000,000 Programme for the issuance of Medium Term Notes, Euro-commercial Paper and other debt instruments (the “Programme”) under which it may from time to time issue medium term notes (the “Notes”, which expression includes Senior Notes and Subordinated Notes (each as defined herein)), short term promissory notes (“ECP”) and other debt instruments as agreed between the Issuer and the relevant Dealer (as defined below), and denominated in any currency agreed between the Issuer and the relevant Dealer. As of 8 September 2004, the maximum aggregate nominal amount of all Notes, ECP and other debt instruments which may be outstanding under the Programme was increased to U.S.$15,000,000,000. This Offering Circular supersedes any offering circular with respect to the Programme issued prior to the date hereof. Any Notes issued under the Programme on or after the date of this Offering Circular are subject to the provisions described herein, but this Offering Circular does not affect the terms of any Notes issued prior to the date hereof. Notes may be issued in bearer or registered form (respectively “Bearer Notes” and “Registered Notes”). ECP may be issued in bearer form only. The maximum aggregate nominal amount of all Notes, ECP and other debt instruments from time to time outstanding under the Programme will not exceed U.S.$15,000,000,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies calculated as described herein), subject to increase as described herein.
    [Show full text]
  • (Luxury Car Tax) Bill 2008 and Related Bills
    The Senate Standing Committee on Economics Tax Laws Amendment (Luxury Car Tax) Bill 2008 A New Tax System (Luxury Car Tax Imposition —General) Amendment Bill 2008 A New Tax System (Luxury Car Tax Imposition —Customs) Amendment Bill 2008 A New Tax System (Luxury Car Tax Imposition —Excise) Amendment Bill 2008 August 2008 © Commonwealth of Australia 2008 ISBN 978-0-642-71957-7 Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. Senate Standing Committee on Economics Members Senator Annette Hurley, Chair South Australia, ALP Senator Alan Eggleston, Deputy Chair Western Australia, LP Senator David Bushby Tasmania, LP Senator Doug Cameron New South Wales, ALP Senator Mark Furner Queensland, ALP Senator Barnaby Joyce Queensland, LNP Senator Louise Pratt Western Australia, ALP Participating Senators Senator the Hon. Eric Abetz Tasmania, LP Senator Mark Bishop Western Australia, ALP Senator Steve Fielding Victoria, FFP Secretariat Mr John Hawkins, Secretary Dr Richard Grant, Principal Research Officer Mr Sean Mehonoshen, Principal Research Officer Ms Stephanie Holden, Senior Research Officer Mr Glenn Ryall, Estimates/Research Officer Ms Lauren McDougall, Executive Assistant PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Ph: 02 6277 3540 Fax: 02 6277 5719 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/economics_ctte/index.htm iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of Committee iii Chapter 1 1 Introduction Background 1 Conduct of the inquiry 1 Background to the bills 2 Chapter 2 5 Key issues Increasing coverage of the LCT over time 5 The impact on the LCT rate increase on car prices and the CPI 8 The impact of the tax on sales of cars 9 The impact on Australian manufacturers 10 Government revenue implications 10 The impact on rural residents and families 11 The rationale for taxing luxury cars at a higher rate than other goods and services 12 The effect of the LCT and the proposed increase in the LCT rate on the adoption of vehicle safety features and environmental technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Data 2021 a Valuable Reference Tool at Your Fingertips
    Tax Data 2021 A valuable reference tool at your fingertips. Tax Data 2021 is current as at 31 August 2021 and contains a vast array of relevant and useful tax information, including: Allowances Benefits Caps Charges and Penalties Dates Limits Rates Rules State Taxes Thresholds For more information on TaxBanter’s training options, including In-house Training, Live Online Training sessions, Public Offer seminars and our Tax Fundamentals program, please visit: W www.taxbanter.com.au E [email protected] T 03 9660 3500 Table of Contents TAX DATA ...................................................................................... 1 Income tax data ...................................................................................... 1 Tax rates ................................................................................................................... 1 2024–25 and later income years ...................................................................... 1 2020–21 to 2023–24 ......................................................................................... 2 2018–19 and 2019–20 ...................................................................................... 2 2017–18 ............................................................................................................ 3 Tax rates for minors .......................................................................................... 4 Medicare levy...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CGE Analysis of the Current Australian Tax System
    KPMG Econtech CGE Analysis of the Current Australian Tax System Final Report 26 March 2010 ABCD Department of the Treasury The Excess Burden of Australian Taxes March 2010 Inherent Limitations This report has been prepared as outlined in the Engagement Letter from KPMG Econtech to Commonwealth Treasury dated 6 February 2009. The services provided in connection with this engagement comprise an advisory engagement which is not subject to Australian Auditing Standards or Australian Standards on Review or Assurance Engagements, and consequently no opinions or conclusions intended to convey assurance have been expressed. No warranty of completeness, accuracy or reliability is given in relation to the statements and representations made by, and the information and documentation provided by Commonwealth Treasury as part of the process. KPMG Econtech have indicated within this report the sources of the information provided. We have not sought to independently verify those sources unless otherwise noted within the report. KPMG Econtech is under no obligation in any circumstance to update this report, in either oral or written form, for events occurring after the report has been issued in final form. The findings in this report are subject to unavoidable statistical variation. While all care has been taken to ensure that the statistical variation is kept to a minimum, care should be taken whenever using this information. This report only takes into account information available to KPMG Econtech up to the date of this report and so its findings may be affected by new information. Should you require clarification of any material, please contact us. The findings in this report have been formed on the above basis.
    [Show full text]