Production of Butyric Acid by the Cellulolytic Actinobacterium Thermobifida Fusca

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Production of Butyric Acid by the Cellulolytic Actinobacterium Thermobifida Fusca PRODUCTION OF BUTYRIC ACID BY THE CELLULOLYTIC ACTINOBACTERIUM THERMOBIFIDA FUSCA by KYLE MERKLEIN B.S., Kansas State University, 2011 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering College of Engineering KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Mei He Abstract Thermobifida fusca, an aerobic moderately thermophilic, filamentous soil bacterium is capable of producing butyric acid. Butyric acid is a 4-carbon short chain fatty acid that is widely used in the chemical, food, and pharmaceutical industries. Currently, butyric acid is primarily produced through petroleum-based chemical synthesis, but could be a candidate to be produced by fermentation. By producing through a fermentation platform, production of butyric acid can be shifted from a non- renewable to a renewable source. In an effort to make T. fusca produce a high yield of butyric acid, multiple fermentation parameters were explored and optimized. The effect of different carbon sources (mannose, xylose, lactose, cellobiose, glucose, sucrose, and acetates) on butyric acid production was studied, where cellobiose produced the highest yield of 0.67 g/g C (g-butyric acid/g-carbon input). The best stir speed and aeration rate for butyric acid production were found to be 400 rpm and 2 vvm in a 5-L fermentor. The maximum titer of 2.1 g/L butyric acid was achieved on 9.66 g/L cellulose. Fermentation was performed on ground corn stover as a substrate to evaluate the production of butyric acid on lignocellulosic biomass, and the optimized conditions resulted in a titer of 2.37 g/L butyric acid. The butyric acid synthesis pathway was identified involving five genes that catalyzed reactions from acetyl-CoA to butanyol-CoA in T. fusca. A study into the transcriptomics of T. fusca was begun by growing T. fusca under a variety of fermentation conditions, isolating the messenger RNA, and performing a sequence of the mRNA using whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing. The results of sequencing of various samples were plotted to determine correlation across numerous fermentation parameters. This correlation based analysis determined that the carbon to nitrogen ratio has the largest overall impact on gene transcription of T. fusca among all of the fermentation parameters studied. Overall, the work from this study proves that production of butyric acid is possible from a renewable cellulosic feedstock. Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... x Dedication ...................................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1 - Introduction to Biomass Utilization ............................................................................. 1 Introduction to Biomass .............................................................................................................. 1 Structure of Lignocellulosic Biomass ......................................................................................... 3 Pretreatment Technologies for Lignocellulosic Biomass ........................................................... 5 Physical Pretreatment .............................................................................................................. 6 Mechanical Method ............................................................................................................ 6 Extrusion Method................................................................................................................ 7 Chemical Pretreatment ............................................................................................................ 8 Alkali pretreatment ............................................................................................................. 8 Acid Pretreatment ............................................................................................................... 9 Ionic Liquids ..................................................................................................................... 10 Physico-chemical Pretreatment ............................................................................................. 12 Steam Explosion ............................................................................................................... 12 Liquid Hot Water .............................................................................................................. 13 Ammonia Fiber Explosion (AFEX) .................................................................................. 14 Enzymatic Hydrolysis ............................................................................................................... 14 Factors effecting Enzymatic Hydrolysis ............................................................................... 15 Enzymes used for Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass .................................................. 16 Consolidated Bioprocessing ..................................................................................................... 20 Cellulose Utilization in CBP ................................................................................................. 23 Substrate Pretreatment for CBP ............................................................................................ 23 Organism Development for CBP .............................................................................................. 25 Native Cellulolytic Strategy .................................................................................................. 25 Metabolic Engineering of Cellulolytic Organisms ........................................................... 26 iv Product Inhibition of Cellulolytic Bacteria ....................................................................... 30 Recombinant Cellulolytic Microorganisms .......................................................................... 32 Cellulase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae .......................................................... 33 Process and Challenges using S. cerevisiae in Consolidated Bioprocessing .................... 33 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 34 Chapter 2 - Review of Consolidated Bioprocessing research using Thermobifida fusca ............. 36 Study of Fermentation Conditions for T. fusca......................................................................... 36 Laboratory evolved T. fusca ..................................................................................................... 37 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 39 Chapter 3 - Butyric Acid Production using T. fusca in Consolidated Bioprocessing ................... 40 Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................. 43 Materials ............................................................................................................................... 43 Culture Conditions ................................................................................................................ 43 Cell density and by-product measurement ............................................................................ 43 Pre-treatment of corn stover .................................................................................................. 44 Addition of precursors of butyric acid into washed cell system ........................................... 44 Enyzme activity .................................................................................................................... 45 RNA Preparation and real-time PCR .................................................................................... 46 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................. 46 Effect of carbon sources on butyric acid fermentation ......................................................... 46 Optimization of fermentation Parameters ............................................................................. 49 Cellulase Production ............................................................................................................. 52 Batch Fermentation on Cellulose .......................................................................................... 53 Batch Fermentation on Milled Corn Stover .......................................................................... 53 Identification of Pathways to Butyric Acid........................................................................... 55 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 57 Chapter 4 - RNASeq Analysis of T. fusca .................................................................................... 59 Study Protocol and Methods ....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Structure and Dynamics of the Microbial Communities Underlying the Carboxylate Platform for Biofuel Production
    Structure and dynamics of the microbial communities underlying the carboxylate platform for biofuel production E.B. Hollister 1, A.K. Forrest 2, H.H. Wilkinson 3, D.J. Ebbole 3, S.A. Malfatti 4, S.G. Tringe 4, M.T. Holtzapple 2, T.J. Gentry 1 1 Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA 77843-2474 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA 77843-3122 3 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX USA 77843-2132 4 DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA 94598 July 31, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation and Characterization of Achromobacter Sp. CX2 From
    Ann Microbiol (2015) 65:1699–1707 DOI 10.1007/s13213-014-1009-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Isolation and characterization of Achromobacter sp. CX2 from symbiotic Cytophagales, a non-cellulolytic bacterium showing synergism with cellulolytic microbes by producing β-glucosidase Xiaoyi Chen & Ying Wang & Fan Yang & Yinbo Qu & Xianzhen Li Received: 27 August 2014 /Accepted: 24 November 2014 /Published online: 10 December 2014 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and the University of Milan 2014 Abstract A Gram-negative, obligately aerobic, non- degradation by cellulase (Carpita and Gibeaut 1993). There- cellulolytic bacterium was isolated from the cellulolytic asso- fore, efficient degradation is the result of multiple activities ciation of Cytophagales. It exhibits biochemical properties working synergistically to efficiently solubilize crystalline cel- that are consistent with its classification in the genus lulose (Sánchez et al. 2004;Lietal.2009). Most known Achromobacter. Phylogenetic analysis together with the phe- cellulolytic organisms produce multiple cellulases that act syn- notypic characteristics suggest that the isolate could be a novel ergistically on native cellulose (Wilson 2008)aswellaspro- species of the genus Achromobacter and designated as CX2 (= duce some other proteins that enhance cellulose hydrolysis CGMCC 1.12675=CICC 23807). The strain CX2 is the sym- (Wang et al. 2011a, b). Synergistic cooperation of different biotic microbe of Cytophagales and produces β-glucosidase. enzymes is a prerequisite for the efficient degradation of cellu- The results showed that the non-cellulolytic Achromobacter lose (Jalak et al. 2012). Both Trichoderma reesi and Aspergillus sp. CX2 has synergistic activity with cellulolytic microbes by niger were co-cultured to increase the levels of different enzy- producing β-glucosidase.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS Table S1. Chemical characteristics of the two digestate forms (SD and WD). Values quoted are expressed as % of air-dry digestate (means followed by standard error in brackets). References for the employed methods used for determination of each chemical characteristic is also reported. SD WD Reference Org C % 44.4 (0.33) 1.1 (0.01) [81] Tot N % 1.4 (0.01) 0.4 (0.01) [82] C/N 31.4 (0.17) 3.1 (0.04) NH4-N % n.d 0.2 (0.00) [83] K % 1.7 (0.00) n.d. [84] P % 0.9 (0.01) n.d. [84] S % 0.23 (0.02) n.d. [85] SD = solid digestate; WD = whole digestate. Table S2. Soil physical and chemical characteristics at the beginning of trial (t0) (means from 9 observations followed by standard errors in brackets). Clay (%) 41.9 (1.22) Silt (%) 47.8 (2.13) Moisture (%) 24.46 (1.24) Bulk density (g cm-3) 1.39 (0.04) pH 8.3 (0) CaCO3 (%) 11.4 (0.7) TOC (g kg-1) 12.8 (0.3) TN (g kg-1) 1.4 (0) C/N 9.4 (0.3) CEC (cmol(+) kg-1) 21.0 (0.7) Exchangeable Bases (mg kg-1) K 278.7 (8.0) Na 22.0 (3.0) Mg 201.7 (25.6) Ca 3718.6 (176.3) Available Microelements (mg kg-1) Cu 28.0 (5.0) Zn 1.7 (0.2) Fe 15.4 (0.5) Mn 16.3 (0.5) TOC = total organic C; TN = total N; CEC = cation exchange capacity Table S3.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2018/064165 A2 (.Pdf)
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/064165 A2 05 April 2018 (05.04.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: Published: A61K 35/74 (20 15.0 1) C12N 1/21 (2006 .01) — without international search report and to be republished (21) International Application Number: upon receipt of that report (Rule 48.2(g)) PCT/US2017/053717 — with sequence listing part of description (Rule 5.2(a)) (22) International Filing Date: 27 September 2017 (27.09.2017) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Langi English (30) Priority Data: 62/400,372 27 September 2016 (27.09.2016) US 62/508,885 19 May 2017 (19.05.2017) US 62/557,566 12 September 2017 (12.09.2017) US (71) Applicant: BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSI¬ TY OF TEXAS SYSTEM [US/US]; 210 West 7th St., Austin, TX 78701 (US). (72) Inventors: WARGO, Jennifer; 1814 Bissonnet St., Hous ton, TX 77005 (US). GOPALAKRISHNAN, Vanch- eswaran; 7900 Cambridge, Apt. 10-lb, Houston, TX 77054 (US). (74) Agent: BYRD, Marshall, P.; Parker Highlander PLLC, 1120 S. Capital Of Texas Highway, Bldg. One, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78746 (US). (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into the Oxidative Degradation of Cellulose by a Copper Metalloenzyme That Exploits Biomass Components
    Insights into the oxidative degradation of cellulose by a copper metalloenzyme that exploits biomass components R. Jason Quinlana,1, Matt D. Sweeneya,1, Leila Lo Leggiob, Harm Ottenb, Jens-Christian N. Poulsenb, Katja Salomon Johansenc,2, Kristian B. R. M. Kroghc, Christian Isak Jørgensenc, Morten Tovborgc, Annika Anthonsenc, Theodora Tryfonad, Clive P. Walterc, Paul Dupreed, Feng Xua, Gideon J. Daviese, and Paul H. Waltone aNovozymes, Inc., Davis, CA 95618; bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; cNovozymes A/S, DK-2880 Bagsværd, Denmark; dDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QW, United Kingdom; and eDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom Edited* by Diter von Wettstein, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, and approved August 2, 2011 (received for review April 13, 2011) The enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant plant biomass is one lysis. From this work, it was suggested that GH61s act directly on of the key industrial challenges of the 21st century. Accordingly, cellulose rendering it more accessible to traditional cellulase there is a continuing drive to discover new routes to promote action (11). Moreover, recent genomic sequencing of the brown polysaccharide degradation. Perhaps the most promising approach rot fungi Postia placenta showed a number of GH61 genes in this involves the application of “cellulase-enhancing factors,” such as organism (13–15), indicating the widespread nature of this those from the glycoside hydrolase (CAZy) GH61 family. Here we family of enzymes in cellulose degradation. As such, GH61s show that GH61 enzymes are a unique family of copper-depen- likely hold major potential for industrial decomposition of dent oxidases.
    [Show full text]
  • Clostridium Sufflavum Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Methanogenic Reactor Treating Cattle Waste
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2009), 59, 981–986 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.001719-0 Clostridium sufflavum sp. nov., isolated from a methanogenic reactor treating cattle waste Tomomi Nishiyama, Atsuko Ueki, Nobuo Kaku and Katsuji Ueki Correspondence Faculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University, Wakaba-machi 1-23, Tsuruoka, Yamagata 997-8555, Atsuko Ueki Japan [email protected] A strictly anaerobic, mesophilic, cellulolytic bacterial strain, designated CDT-1T, was isolated from rice-straw residue from a methanogenic reactor treating waste from cattle farms. The isolation was performed using enrichment culture with filter paper as a substrate. Cells stained Gram-negative, but reacted Gram-positively in the KOH test. Cells were slightly curved rods and were motile by means of peritrichous flagella. The strain produced yellow pigment when grown on filter-paper fragments. Although spore formation was not confirmed microscopically, thermotolerant cells were produced when the strain was grown on filter paper. The optimum temperature for growth was 33 6C and the optimum pH was 7.4. Oxidase, catalase and nitrate-reducing activities were absent. The strain utilized xylose, fructose, glucose, cellobiose, xylooligosaccharide, cellulose (filter-paper fragments and ball-milled filter paper) and xylan. The major fermentation products were acetate, ethanol, H2 and CO2. The major cellular fatty acids were iso-C15 : 0, iso-C14 : 0 and C16 : 0 DMA. The cell-wall peptidoglycan contained meso-diaminopimelic acid as the diagnostic diamino acid. The genomic DNA G+C content was 40.7 mol%. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities, strain CDT-1T could be placed in cluster III of the genus Clostridium, being closely related to type strains of Clostridium hungatei (96.6 % sequence similarity), Clostridium termitidis (96.2 %) and Clostridium papyrosolvens (96.1 %).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Sampling Techniques and Different Media for The
    Systematic and Applied Microbiology 42 (2019) 481–487 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Systematic and Applied Microbiology jou rnal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/syapm Comparison of sampling techniques and different media for the enrichment and isolation of cellulolytic organisms from biogas fermentersଝ a a b a,∗ Regina Rettenmaier , Carina Duerr , Klaus Neuhaus , Wolfgang Liebl , a,c,∗ Vladimir V. Zverlov a Department of Microbiology, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany b Core Facility Microbiome/NGS, ZIEL — Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, 85354 Freising, Germany c Institute of Molecular Genetics, RAS, Kurchatov Sq. 2, 123128 Moscow, Russia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Biogas plants achieve its highest yield on plant biomass only with the most efficient hydrolysis of cellulose. Received 27 March 2019 This is driven by highly specialized hydrolytic microorganisms, which we have analyzed by investigating Received in revised form 15 May 2019 enrichment strategies for the isolation of cellulolytic bacteria out of a lab-scale biogas fermenter. We Accepted 17 May 2019 compared three different cultivation media as well as two different inoculation materials: Enrichment on filter paper in nylon bags (in sacco) or raw digestate. Next generation sequencing of the V3/V4 region Keywords: of the bacterial 16S rRNA of metagenomic DNA from six different enrichment cultures, each in biolog- Biogas fermenter ical triplicates, revealed an average richness of 48 different OTU’s with an average evenness of 0.3 in Cellulose degradation each sample.
    [Show full text]
  • André Luis Alves Neves 6
    Elucidating the role of the rumen microbiome in cattle feed efficiency and its 1 potential as a reservoir for novel enzyme discovery 2 3 by 4 5 André Luis Alves Neves 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of 13 14 15 Doctor of Philosophy 16 17 in 18 19 Animal Science 20 21 22 23 24 25 Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science 26 University of Alberta 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 © André Luis Alves Neves, 2019 38 39 40 Abstract 1 2 The rapid advances in omics technologies have led to a tremendous progress in our 3 understanding of the rumen microbiome and its influence on cattle feed efficiency. 4 However, significant gaps remain in the literature concerning the driving forces that 5 influence the relationship between the rumen microbiota and host individual variation, and 6 how their interactive effects on animal productivity contribute to the identification of cattle 7 with improved feed efficiency. Furthermore, little is known about the impact of mRNA- 8 based metatranscriptomics on the analysis of rumen taxonomic profiles, and a strategy 9 for the discovery of lignocellulolytic enzymes through the targeted functional profiling of 10 carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) remains to be developed. Study 1 investigated 11 the dynamics of rumen microorganisms in cattle raised under different feeding regimens 12 (forage vs. grain) and studied the relationship among the abundance of these 13 microorganisms, host individuality and the diet. To examine host individual variation in 14 the rumen microbial abundance following dietary switches, hosts were grouped based on 15 the magnitude of microbial population shift using log2-fold change (log2-fc) in the copy 16 numbers of bacteria, archaea, protozoa and fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2014/135633 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2014/135633 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12N 9/04 (2006.01) C12P 7/16 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C12N 9/88 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/EP2014/054334 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 6 March 2014 (06.03.2014) MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (25) Filing Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, (26) Publication Language: English TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 13 158012.8 6 March 2013 (06.03.2013) EP (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicants: CLARIANT PRODUKTE (DEUTSCH- GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, LAND) GMBH [DE/DE]; Briiningstrasse 50, 65929 UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, Frankfurt am Main (DE).
    [Show full text]
  • From Genotype to Phenotype: Inferring Relationships Between Microbial Traits and Genomic Components
    From genotype to phenotype: inferring relationships between microbial traits and genomic components Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨atD¨usseldorf vorgelegt von Aaron Weimann aus Oberhausen D¨usseldorf,29.08.16 aus dem Institut f¨urInformatik der Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨atD¨usseldorf Gedruckt mit der Genehmigung der Mathemathisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨atder Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨atD¨usseldorf Referent: Prof. Dr. Alice C. McHardy Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Martin J. Lercher Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 24.02.17 Selbststandigkeitserkl¨ arung¨ Hiermit erkl¨areich, dass ich die vorliegende Dissertation eigenst¨andigund ohne fremde Hilfe angefertig habe. Arbeiten Dritter wurden entsprechend zitiert. Diese Dissertation wurde bisher in dieser oder ¨ahnlicher Form noch bei keiner anderen Institution eingereicht. Ich habe bisher keine erfolglosen Promotionsversuche un- ternommen. D¨usseldorf,den . ... ... ... (Aaron Weimann) Statement of authorship I hereby certify that this dissertation is the result of my own work. No other person's work has been used without due acknowledgement. This dissertation has not been submitted in the same or similar form to other institutions. I have not previously failed a doctoral examination procedure. Summary Bacteria live in almost any imaginable environment, from the most extreme envi- ronments (e.g. in hydrothermal vents) to the bovine and human gastrointestinal tract. By adapting to such diverse environments, they have developed a large arsenal of enzymes involved in a wide variety of biochemical reactions. While some such enzymes support our digestion or can be used for the optimization of biotechnological processes, others may be harmful { e.g. mediating the roles of bacteria in human diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein & Peptide Letters
    696 Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] Protein & Peptide Letters, 2017, 24, 696-709 REVIEW ARTICLE ISSN: 0929-8665 eISSN: 1875-5305 Impact Factor: 1.068 Glycan Phosphorylases in Multi-Enzyme Synthetic Processes BENTHAM Editor-in-Chief: SCIENCE Ben M. Dunn Giulia Pergolizzia, Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarpa, Eeshan Kalitaa,b and Robert A. Fielda,* aDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK; bDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tezpur University, Napaam, Tezpur, Assam -784028, India Abstract: Glycoside phosphorylases catalyse the reversible synthesis of glycosidic bonds by glyco- A R T I C L E H I S T O R Y sylation with concomitant release of inorganic phosphate. The equilibrium position of such reac- tions can render them of limited synthetic utility, unless coupled with a secondary enzymatic step Received: January 17, 2017 Revised: May 24, 2017 where the reaction lies heavily in favour of product. This article surveys recent works on the com- Accepted: June 20, 2017 bined use of glycan phosphorylases with other enzymes to achieve synthetically useful processes. DOI: 10.2174/0929866524666170811125109 Keywords: Phosphorylase, disaccharide, α-glucan, cellodextrin, high-value products, biofuel. O O 1. INTRODUCTION + HO OH Glycoside phosphorylases (GPs) are carbohydrate-active GH enzymes (CAZymes) (URL: http://www.cazy.org/) [1] in- H2O O GP volved in the formation/cleavage of glycosidic bond together O O GT O O + HO O + HO with glycosyltransferase (GT) and glycoside hydrolase (GH) O -- NDP OPO3 NDP -- families (Figure 1) [2-6]. GT reactions favour the thermody- HPO4 namically more stable glycoside product [7]; however, these GS R enzymes can be challenging to work with because of their O O + HO current limited availability and relative instability, along R with the expense of sugar nucleotide substrates [7].
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro and in Vivo Exploration of the Cellobiose and Cellodextrin Phosphorylases Panel in Ruminiclostridium Cellulolyticum: Im
    Liu et al. Biotechnol Biofuels (2019) 12:208 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1549-x Biotechnology for Biofuels RESEARCH Open Access In vitro and in vivo exploration of the cellobiose and cellodextrin phosphorylases panel in Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum: implication for cellulose catabolism Nian Liu1, Aurélie Fosses1, Clara Kampik1, Goetz Parsiegla2, Yann Denis3, Nicolas Vita1, Henri‑Pierre Fierobe1 and Stéphanie Perret1* Abstract Background: In anaerobic cellulolytic micro‑organisms, cellulolysis results in the action of several cellulases gathered in extracellular multi‑enzyme complexes called cellulosomes. Their action releases cellobiose and longer cellodex‑ trins which are imported and further degraded in the cytosol to fuel the cells. In Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum, an anaerobic and cellulolytic mesophilic bacteria, three cellodextrin phosphorylases named CdpA, CdpB, and CdpC, were identifed in addition to the cellobiose phosphorylase (CbpA) previously characterized. The present study aimed at characterizing them, exploring their implication during growth on cellulose to better understand the life‑style of cellulolytic bacteria on such substrate. Results: The three cellodextrin phosphorylases from R. cellulolyticum displayed marked diferent enzymatic char‑ acteristics. They are specifc for cellodextrins of diferent lengths and present diferent kcat values. CdpC is the most active enzyme before CdpA, and CdpB is weakly active. Modeling studies revealed that a mutation of a conserved histidine residue in the phosphate ion‑binding pocket in CdpB and CdpC might explain their activity‑level diferences. The genes encoding these enzymes are scattered over the chromosome of R. cellulolyticum and only the expression of the gene encoding the cellobiose phosphorylase and the gene cdpA is induced during cellulose growth. Char‑ acterization of four independent mutants constructed in R.
    [Show full text]