Following Utzon's Footsteps in Hawai‛I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Architecture and Urbanism in the Middle East
Viewpoints Special Edition Architecture and Urbanism in the Middle East The Middle East Institute Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints is another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US relations with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org Cover photos, clockwise from the top left hand corner: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (Imre Solt; © GFDL); Tripoli, Libya (Patrick André Perron © GFDL); Burj al Arab Hotel in Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Al Faisaliyah Tower in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Doha, Qatar skyline (Abdulrahman photo); Selimiye Mosque, Edirne, Turkey (Murdjo photo); Registan, Samarkand, Uzbekistan (Steve Evans photo). -
Critical Regionalism: Whatever Happened to Autonomy
fusion-journal.com http://www.fusion-journal.com/issue/004-fusion-the-town-and-the-city/critical-regionalism-whatever-happened-to-autonomy/# Critical Regionalism: Whatever Happened to Autonomy Opening In his most recent take on “critical regionalism,” Kenneth Frampton revisits the dichotomy between centre and periphery. It is not the implied territorial divide that interest Frampton. At issue is how architecture could or should define the periphery in contrast to the hegemonic architecture unfolding in the centre. Frampton’s take is centred on the ways that technological apparatus, under the auspices of capitalism, transform the cities one- dimensionally. From China to wherever else that capital today finds a home for fast accumulation, we witness “the mediagenic impact of spectacular form which is,” Frampton observes, “as much due to the capacity of ‘superstar architects’ to come up with sensational, novel images as to their organizational competence and technical abilities.”[i] For a better understanding of Frampton’s position we need to give attention to the change in the title of his text. Since the rise of postmodernism, Frampton has constantly searched for alternative(s) in the work of architects who sidetrack the post-sixties turn to historical eclecticism and the drive for formal autonomy, to mention two dominant tendencies of the time. As early as the 1980s, Frampton mapped the thematic of “critical regionalism” with phenomenological aspiration for the duality between “national culture” and civilization. [ii] Exploring the early -
The Ideology of Critical Regionalism As a Teaching and Design Resource for the Next 100 Years of Cela
THE IDEOLOGY OF CRITICAL REGIONALISM AS A TEACHING AND DESIGN RESOURCE FOR THE NEXT 100 YEARS OF CELA Hopman, David D. The University of Texas at Arlington, [email protected] 1 ABSTRACT Since its introduction as a term by Alexander Tzonis and Liane Lefaivre (Tzonis and Lefaivre, 1981), Critical Regionalism has emerged as a significant ideology in contemporary landscape architectural discourse worldwide that continues to merit closer attention as a framework for creative regional design. Kristine Woolsey wrote that the only constant in the process of Critical Regionalism is the quality of the ideological position of the architect that evolves over time through practice, experience, and the international debate of the profession (Woolsey, 1991). Looking towards the next 100 years of CELA, it is worth reflecting on where we are ideologically as a profession in relation to Critical Regionalism. Critical Regionalism can be broadly summarized as an embrace of contemporary and historical world culture as an indispensable part of a creative and expressive regionalist design process, a desire to provoke both intellectual (critical thinking) and sensual reactions to a design by the end user, and a broadening of the experience intended by design to embrace the importance of non-visual experience. Personal ideological positions related to Critical Regionalism are informed and modified by influences of region, contemporary culture, and aesthetic components such as environmental psychology, cultural rules, personal growth and creativity, and the appropriation of regional ecology and environmental forces. The author has used research into Critical Regionalism as a guiding ideology for both practice, research, and education for the past 25 years. -
Read the Correspondent Article
Winter 2015 SILENT KILLER DR. KAZEM BEHBEHANI ON THE FIGHT CAPITAL ASSETS AGAINST DIABETES BANKING DOYENNE BY ROYAL APPOINTMENT NEMAT SHAFIK LYNNE DAVIS ON EMINENT BRITISH PRINTERS BARNARD & WESTWOOD CULTURE CLASH BARUCH SPIEGEL RETHINKING SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION IN KUWAIT OUTER SPACES SALMAN ZAFAR EXTOLLS THE NEED FOR GREEN UTZON UNTOLD KUWAIT NATIONAL ASSEMBLY: THE MAKING OF A MASTERPIECE IN CONVERSATION HaIlIng from a DanIsh desIgn dynasty, Jan Utzon speaks to Charlotte Shalgosky about workIng wIth hIs father, the globally-recognIzed Jørn Utzon, on hIs desIgn of the KuwaIt NatIonal Assembly. Jan Utzon greets me warmly, even and environmental sympathies in his native Denmark he is strikingly most eloquently; a building that, tall. Looking much younger than his when it frst opened, epitomized seventy-plus years his limber frame the simplicity and the sensitivity of and sparkling eyes are remarkably Utzon’s understated brilliance as reminiscent of his father, Jørn, much as his love of the Middle East. with whom he worked so closely Even before it was completed, the throughout his life. late British architectural critic Stephen Gardiner wrote “When fnished, it Jørn Utzon died in 2008 having won will be one of the great buildings almost every architectural prize of the world”. and accolade, and having been lauded for his visionary designs. In 1968, when the competition Columbia University Professor, to design the Kuwait National Kenneth Frampton, wrote in the Assembly was being held, Jan Harvard Design Magazine “Nobody was just starting out on his own can study the future of architecture career in architecture in Denmark; without Jørn Utzon”. -
The Utzon Paradigm
THE UTZON PARADIGM Roger Tyrrell Co-Director of the Jørn Utzon Research Network (JURN) and Adrian Carter Co- Director of the Jørn Utzon Research Network (JURN), Director of the Utzon Research Center, Aalborg University. RE-CONSIDERING UTZON “Comparable in subtle ways to the protean achievements of Le Corbusier, Utzon’s architecture emerges today as paradigmatic at many levels not least of which is the manner in which, from the beginning of his career, he would challenge the assumed superiority of Eurocentric culture.” (Frampton. K. 2003 p 6) This Paper strives to address three objectives. The first is to discuss the Utzon’s oeuvre from a paradigmatic perspective, the second to layer that paradigm within two distinct but interconnected frameworks. The third objective is to explore the fusion of this dichotomous paradigm through the concept of ‘poetic conjunction’. Jørn Utzon (1918-2008) is now internationally recognised as one of the most original, innovative and socially concerned of modern architects, perhaps the last great exponent of the humanistic Nordic tradition within modern architecture. He is the architect of what is still widely considered the most noble and humane housing built in Denmark, a simple, yet poetic modern church at Bagsværd and the most iconic and popular building of the 20th Century, his great unfinished masterpiece, the Sydney Opera House. (Fig 1) The Opera House has become the symbol of not just Sydney, but also Australia; that owes it origins to the maritime environment of Aalborg, where Jørn Utzon spent his youth, and the inspiration of his father Aage Utzon, an esteemed yacht designer. -
Jørn Utzon's Synthesis of Chinese and Japanese Architecture in the Design for Bagsværd Church
arq (2019), Page 1 of 22 © Cambridge University Press 2019 doi: 10.1017/S1359135518000696 history This article explores Utzon’s engagement with the cultures of Japan and China, demonstrating how he took inspiration from both calligraphy and monastery design. Jørn Utzon’s synthesis of Chinese and Japanese architecture in the design for Bagsværd Church Chen-Yu Chiu, Philip Goad, Peter Myers, Nur Yıldız Kılınçer Introduction article attempts to address the detailed process of In his essay of 1983, ‘Towards a Critical Regionalism’, Utzon’s cross-cultural practices for his design of the Kenneth Frampton referred to the Bagsværd Church Bagsværd Church in order to reveal how Utzon as a primary exemplar, briefly citing the architect’s interpreted specific ideas, ideals, and artefacts from representation of ‘the Chinese pagoda roof’ in this East Asian building culture. project, to emphasise the importance of cross- To elucidate the above unsolved issues and examine cultural inspiration in the creation of ‘critical the precise role of Chinese and Japanese architecture regionalism’.1 Peter Myers followed Frampton in his in Utzon’s design of Bagsværd Church, the authors 1993 ‘Une histoire inachevée’, arguing for the have consulted both the Utzon Archives and the family significant role that Chinese architecture played as a collection of material from his architectural career, source for Utzon’s Bagsværd Church design and while conducting interviews with Utzon’s former further variations on the theme of Chinese and assistants and his son Jan Utzon. These new primary Japanese exemplars on Utzon’s work follows. sources have allowed the authors to review Utzon’s Françoise Fromonot established the importance of design process critically and analyse the architect’s the 1925 edition of the Yingzao-fashi (State Building perception and representation of various ideas, Standard, first published in1103 ad) and Johannes ideals, and artefacts of Chinese and Japanese building Prip-Møller’s 1937 Chinese Buddhist Monasteries for culture. -
Utzon's Beautiful Ideas: an Antidote to “The Australian Ugliness”?
FOURTH INTERNATIONAL UTZON SYMPOSIUM – SYDNEY AUSTRALIA WHAT WOULD UTZON DO NOW? Utzon’s Beautiful Ideas: An Antidote to “The Australian Ugliness”? Adrian Carter Utzon Research Center, Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University There is no doubting that with the realisation of the As Gadamer notes, Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten Sydney Opera House, Jørn Utzon created what is both (1714-1762), the German philosopher from whom we popularly and critically acclaimed to be one of the most have the origins of our contemporary understanding of beautiful works of architecture not only of its own era a sense of beauty, defined aesthetics as the art of and location, but that transcends time and place to thinking beautifully (Gadamer p.17). It was Hegel who achieve universal appreciation. What is the beautiful went further than Baugarten in the philosophical though? What was Utzon’s understanding of the consideration of the significance of the shared beautiful and where did the beautiful come from in his experience of the beautiful, and as Gadamer expresses work, not only at the monumental scale of the Sydney it determined that” the kind of truth that we encounter in Opera House, but also within his approach to domestic the experience of the beautiful does unambiguously make a architecture to which he was equally dedicated and claim to more than merely subjective validity” (Gadamer, adept; and how could his work, particularly his housing p.18) provide beautiful models for now and the future. Juhani Pallasmaa goes further and cites the Russian As Richard Leplastrier talking of his time with Utzon Nobel prize winning poet Joseph Brodsky’s belief that recounts, “Quite often in the office he would say something “the purpose of evolution is beauty” as underpinning his like “ah, that is such a beautiful idea” (Botin, Carter and own understanding and writings on architecture. -
Dwelling, Landscape, Place and Making
DWELLING, LANDSCAPE, PLACE AND MAKING Jørn Utzon Anthology Lars Botin, Adrian Carter and Roger Tyrrell Copyright © 2013 by Adrian Carter, Lars Botion and Roger Tyrrell / Jørn Utzon Research Network / Utzon Research Center, Aalborg University Title: Dwelling, Landscape, Place and Making Print: Aalborg University Press Graphics and Layout: Line Nørskov Eriksen ISBN: xxx-xx-xxxx-xxx-x 1st Edition, Printed in Denmark 2013 Published with the kind support of Department of Architectural Design and Mediatechnology, Aalborg University Portsmouth School of Architecture, University of Portsmouth FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT CONTENTS xx Introduction Part 1 Foundation xx The Utzon Paradigm – Tyrrell, R. and Carter, A. xx Jørn Utzon: Influences and Reinterpretation – Carter, A. xx Thrills, Wiews and Shelter at Majorca – Roberts, J. xx Architecture and Camping – Taylor, P. and Hinds, M. Part 2 Influence xx Jan Utzon’s Symposium Presentation xx Rick Leplastrier’s Symposium Presentation Part 3 Reflection xx Making the World: Space, Place and Time in Architecture – Pallasmaa, J. xx Landscape and Dwelling – Botin, L. xx The Nature of Dwelling – Tyrrell, R. INTRODUCTION Background and acknowledgments This anthology is based on the Proceedings of the Third International Utzon Symposium held on 1st April 2012 in the Dar el Bacha palace, Marrakech, Morocco. The Symposium was a further development of the previous two Symposia held by the Utzon Research Center in Aalborg, Denmark and represents a collaboration between the Jørn Utzon Research Network (JURN), The Utzon Research Center and L’ Ecole Nationale d’Architecture (ENA) of Morocco. Morocco was chosen as the location for the event in recognition of the significant influence it had upon Utzon’s canon after his visit in 1949. -
The Role of Jørn Utzon's 1958 Study Trip to China in His Architectural Maturity
$UFKLWHFWXUDO Chiu, C-Y 2016 China Receives Utzon: The Role of Jørn Utzon’s 1958 Study Trip to China in His Architectural Maturity. Architectural Histories, 4(1): 12, +LVWRULHV pp. 1–25, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ah.182 RESEARCH ARTICLE China Receives Utzon: The Role of Jørn Utzon’s 1958 Study Trip to China in His Architectural Maturity Chen-Yu Chiu Both before and after his study trip to China in 1958, Danish architect Jørn Utzon (1918–2008) consistently cited dynastic Chinese architecture as one of his essential design ideals. This article commences with a reconstruction, using archival and anecdotal evidence, of Jørn Utzon’s 1958 study trip to China with his close friend, the noted Norwegian architect Geir Grung (1926–89). The investigation seeks to explain both why, as a student, Utzon was so interested in the civilisation of China and how his carefully planned journey yielded Utzon both an intuitive grasp of ideas of Chinese architecture, and, most importantly, a continuing interest in China’s traditional systems of building construction. The answers could add to a methodological and theoretical framework for understanding Utzon’s work. Introduction This article then establishes built-form analogies Both before and after his study trip to China in 1958, the between Utzon’s 1958 study of Chinese architecture in situ Danish architect Jørn Utzon (1918–2008) consistently and his design proposals over the three decades following cited dynastic Chinese architecture as one of his essential the trip, with a view to retracing the path of Utzon’s grow- design ideas and ideals (Faber and Utzon, 1947; Utzon ing understanding of Chinese architecture during this 1962; 1970). -
Libro ZARCH 10.Indb
Bond University Research Repository Utzon: The defining light of the Third Generation Carter, Adrian; Sarvimaki, Marja Published in: ZARCH DOI: 10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2018102933 Published: 01/06/2018 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Bond University research repository. Recommended citation(APA): Carter, A., & Sarvimaki, M. (2018). Utzon: The defining light of the Third Generation. ZARCH, (10), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2018102933 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. For more information, or if you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact the Bond University research repository coordinator. Download date: 02 Aug 2019 TítuloUtzon: The defining light of the Third TítuloGeneration Utzon: La luz definidora de la Tercera Generación AUTOR ADRIAN CARTER Débora Domingo-Calabuig “A single strategy: Southeastern Massachusetts Technological Institute by Paul Rudolph” ZARCH 10 (Junio 2018): 114- 124 MARJA SARVIMÄKI ISSN: 2341-0531. http://dx.doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.201792263 Recibido: 20-2-2018 Aceptado: 8-5-2018 Adrian Carter y Marja Sarvimäki, “Utzon: The defining light of the Third Generation”, ZARCH 10 (Junio 2018): 88-99 Abstract ISSN: 2341-0531. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2018102933 Recibido:Paul. 6-2-2018 Aceptado: 18-5-2018 AbstractKeywords InPaul Space, Time, and Architecture, Sigfried Giedion identified Jørn Utzon as one of the proponents and leaders of what Giedion regarded as the Third Generation of modern architecture in the 20th century. -
Lecture Handouts, 2013
Arch. 48-350 -- Postwar Modern Architecture, S’13 Prof. Gutschow, Classs #1 INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW Introductions Expectations Textbooks Assignments Electronic reserves Research Project Sources History-Theory-Criticism Methods & questions of Architectural History Assignments: Initial Paper Topic form Arch. 48-350 -- Postwar Modern Architecture, S’13 Prof. Gutschow, Classs #2 ARCHITECTURE OF WWII The World at War (1939-45) Nazi War Machine - Rearming Germany after WWI Albert Speer, Hitler’s architect & responsible for Nazi armaments Autobahn & Volkswagen Air-raid Bunkers, the “Atlantic Wall”, “Sigfried Line”, by Fritz Todt, 1941ff Concentration Camps, Labor Camps, POW Camps Luftwaffe Industrial Research London Blitz, 1940-41 by Germany Bombing of Japan, 1944-45 by US Bombing of Germany, 1941-45 by Allies Europe after WWII: Reconstruction, Memory, the “Blank Slate” The American Scene: Pearl Harbor, Dec. 7, 1941 Pentagon, by Berman, DC, 1941-43 “German Village,” Utah, planned by US Army & Erich Mendelsohn Military production in Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Detroit, Akron, Cleveland, Gary, KC, etc. Albert Kahn, Detroit, “Producer of Production Lines” * Willow Run B-24 Bomber Plant (Ford; then Kaiser Autos, now GM), Ypsilanti, MI, 1941 Oak Ridge, TN, K-25 uranium enrichment factory; town by S.O.M., 1943 Midwest City, OK, near Midwest Airfield, laid out by Seward Mott, Fed. Housing Authortiy, 1942ff Wartime Housing by Vernon Demars, Louis Kahn, Oscar Stonorov, William Wurster, Richard Neutra, Walter Gropius, Skidmore-Owings-Merrill, et al * Aluminum Terrace, Gropius, Natrona Heights, PA, 1941 Women’s role in the war production, “Rosie the Riverter” War time production transitions to peacetime: new materials, new design, new products Plywod Splint, Charles Eames, 1941 / Saran Wrap / Fiberglass, etc. -
The Pritzker Architecture Prize 2003 Presented to Jørn Utzon
THE PRITZKER ARCHITECTURE PRIZE 2003 PRESENTED TO JØRN UTZON 01 SPONSORED BY THE HYATT FOUNDATION Photo by David Messent 02 Sydney Opera House Sydney, Australia 1957-1973 Photo by David Messent 03 Sydney Opera House Sydney, Australia 1957-1973 Note to Editors: The photos included in this booklet are a sampling of the Laureates’ work, a catalogue of the images available for publication. The numbers beside the images are are for reference to a CD (in high and low resolutions), the web. The photos and drawings may only be used in the context of the Pritzker Prize announcement. For any other advertising or publicity purposes, media must contact Utzon Architects for permission. It should further be noted that the images in this booklet are all 200 line screen lithographs printed on high gloss stock. They replace the need for black & white continuous tone prints. They may be reproduced using 85 line screens for black & white newspaper reproduction, and they can be resized, either 50% larger or smaller with no degradation in image quality or moire effect. Please note that detailed information about each project is available on the Pritzker Prize web site (pritzkerprize.com). The photo credit line shown next to each photo should appear adjacent to the photos when published. All photos are through the courtesy of Utzon Architects who provided the same images to the publisher of Utzon by Richard Weston. Photo by David Messent 04 Sydney Opera House Sydney, Australia 1957-1973 Photo by David Messent 05 Sydney Opera House Sydney, Australia 1957-1973