Diseases of Tulips

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diseases of Tulips Contents Fungus Diseases __ ·------ ___ ____ ___ ________________ _______ _ 3 Blackleg ______________ ·--------------. ----------------- _ . __ __ 19 Virus Diseases _--------------------------------- ____ _______ __ 3 Botrytis Measles ___ _______ _ -- -------------------·--------- 19 Nematode Diseases ________________________ ----··-··-- __ 3 Fluorine _____ ---------·---------- ________ ----------- ------ __ ___ _ 19 Bacterial Diseases ---------------------------------------- 4 Fusarium Leaf Blight -------------- --------------·--- __ _ 19 Physiological Diseases __________________________________ _ 4 Miscellaneous N em a toes ------------------------ ---- - ___ 19 Rhizoctonia Blight ____ ______ --------------------··--------- 19 MAJOR D ISEASES Basal Rot ________________ ___________________________________ _ 4 Rust and Smuts _______ _--------------- ------------------- _ 20 Black Slime (Black Rot) __________________________ _ 6 Sclerotinia Sativa --------------------- ------- ______ _____ ___ 2 0 Skin Disease (La Reine) _______________ _____ ____ ______ 20 Blue Mold ----------------------------------------- ______ . ____ 7 Smoulder ___ _____ __ ______ __ __________________________ ----· __ ____ 2 0 Botrytis Blight (Fire) --··----------------------------- 7 Bulb and Stem Nematode (Eelworm) _______ _ 10 Sooty Bulbs ------------·----------------------·----------- ___ _ 20 Crown Rot (Southern Wilt) ____ _______ ___________ 11 PHYSIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS Foot Rot (Root Rot, Shoo trot, Shanking) _ __ 12 Blind, Blasted, or Deformed Flowers ______ __ ____ _ 20 Gray Bulb· Rot (Bad Soil) __________________________ 12 Blueing of Bulbs ( Blawgroeien) ___________ _________ 20 Pythium Root Rot and Soft Rot ____ ___ ____________ 13 Bud Necrosis (Core Rot or Kernrot) ____ __ __ ___ _ 20 Topple (Sugarstem or Wet Stem) _______________ 14 Ethylene Damage ____________ ________ ____ -··- ------ -- ______ 21 Frost Injury ___ ___________ _______ ________ ---------------·----. 21 V IRUS DISEASES Heat Damage ___ __ ______ _________ ____ ______ __ ____ ________ ____ 21 Major Virus Diseases of Tulips- Table __ ______ 16 Tulip Breaking (Mosaic) ________________ ____________ 16 Gun1mosis --------------------------------- --------- __ __ ___ __ 21 Nutrient Deficiencies _ ---------------------------------- 21 Yellow Pox _______ --------------------- ------------- ___ __ ______ 18 Mechanical Damage --------------------------------__ __ 22 MISCELLANEOUS DISEASES Hard Base ------------------------------------------------ __ __ 2 2 Anthracnose _______ __________ _____________________ __________ 19 KEY to Major Tulip Diseases _______________________ 23 Many of the recommendations in this bulletin are based upon cooperative research with other colleagues, particularly Mr. Vern Miller and Dr. Neil Stuart. We express our gratitude to them and to Mr. Worth Vassey and Mrs. Evelyn Morris for their research assistance; to Drs. Tom Allen, Alan Brunt, Gary Chas­ tagner, William Haglund, ]. ]. Hesling, David Price, Alen Rees, and Willis Wheeler for reviewing the manuscript; and to the Washington State Bulb Commission and the Northwest Bulb Growers Associa­ tion for their support in the research and publication of this bulletin. Issued by W ashington State University Cooperative Extension, ]. 0 . Young, Director, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture in furtherance of the Acts of May 8 and June 20, 1914. Extension programs are available to all persons without discrimination. Issued August 1979. 2 DISEASES OF TULIPS CHARLES J. GouLD, Plant Pathologist, Emeritus, and RALPH S. B);'THER, Extension Plant Pathologist, Western Washington Research and Extension Center, Puyallup In general, botrytis blight (fire) is the one able from Xerox University Microfilms, 300 N. serious disease of tulips that consistently occurs Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106) . in the Pacific Northwest. It is also the most ser­ ious in other growing areas of the world. Our climate is extremely favorable for the develop­ Fungus Diseases ment of this fungus disease. Other diseases that may cause trouble at times include crown rot, Many important diseases of tulips are caused basal rot, blue mold, and tulip break. by fungi. Fungi are small and rather simple plants The most threatening disease to the tulip in­ unable to produce their own food because they dustry is the bulb or stem nematode. It is not do not have the green coloring matter ( chloro­ known to be present here, but we urge growers phyll). Rather than manufacture their own food, to keep a sharp lookout. It is more destructive they feed on living or dead plants and animals than the race attacking daffodils, and it spreads resulting in disease or decay of the tissues they -easily. It is almost impossible to eradicate since attack. tulip bulbs cannot tolerate the full hot water Fungi produce very small seed-like bodies treatment. called spores. These microscopic spores can be spread by splashing rain or wind or carried along A key to the rna jor diseases is provided. In with the movement of soil or infected plant addition, there are many diseases listed as minor debris. Fungi survive from one season to the next, that are occasionally serious, so do not overlook either as dormant spores in the soil or as thread- . them when diagnosing a problem. If in doubt, like growths within a bulb or diseased plant take samples to a local expert who may be able tissue or as hardened lumps of tissue in the soil to help you. where the bulb grew. These masses of weather­ The controls listed are for commercial pro­ resisting fungus tissue are usually rounded, hard, duction. Disease Control Recommendations for and are called sclerotia. Tulips, EM 4315, is updated annually to identify currently registered pesticides for disease control. When chemical applications are recommended, Virus Diseases the hobbyist will probably find it necessary to spray as often as the commercial grower to obtain Virus particles are so small that they cannot adequate control. In general it is a good practice be seen with an ordinary light microscope but re­ to eliminate all abnormal plants or bulbs as soon quire the use of an electron microscope. When as noticed and change planting locations at least they gain access to a plant, they usually penetrate evety other year. into every part except the seed. Therefore, when­ ever a "daughter" bulb is taken from a virus-in­ The authors have drawn heavily upon the fected plant, it is usually also infected. Certain following publications and readers are referred insects, such as aphids, which feed on plant sap to them for additional information. can spread some virus diseases. MOORE, W. C. 1949. Diseases of bulbs. Min. Ag. and Fish. Bul. 117, London. (A re­ vision is in press.) Nematode Diseases REES, A. R. 1972. The growth of bulbs. Nematodes are very small thread-like worms. Academic Press. Many commonly live in the soil without doing General culture, forcing, etc. are covered in any harm, while others attack various plants. The more detail in the Handbook on Bulb Growing bulb nematode and root lesion nematodes, which and Forcing, edited by C. J. Gould, 1957 (avail- affect tulips, are too small to be seen without a 3 microscope. Nematodes survive from season to season as eggs. They also can survive for several years in bulbs or in infected plant tissue. Any movement of soil or infected plant parts can be responsible for the spread of nematodes. Farm equipment, irrigation, flooding, and planting in­ fected bulbs are common ways of spread. Bacterial Diseases Basal rot Bacteria are simple, microscopic, usually single­ the base. The roots are a dull gray. Small, gray, celled plants which depend upon other plant or slightly sunken spots with a dark edge appear animal sources for their food. Most are beneficial first on the bulbs. These may enlarge rapidly with and only occasionally do they cause trouble in a soft, dull white, gray to brown decay that has tulips. Spread and survival are dependent on the a sour odor. Later these tissues shrink, become presence of infected plants or plant tissues since firm, and often have felty masses of white or pink the bacteria are not able to survive for any period mold (mycelium) and powdery masses of spores of time in soil. in or under the husk. Often the infection is ring­ like with concentric rings of darker zones. The Physiological Diseases initial symptoms are often small and easily over­ looked. Symptoms increase during storage and All problems that are not caused by para­ usually the bulb continues to decay and is con­ sitic organisms are considered in this group. verted to a granular mass. Often this process is Tulips are quite susceptible to unfavorable weath­ aided by mites. Gum may be exuded during the er. Frost may injure their leaves, the sun may early stages. burn the bulbs, and undesirable temperatures may prevent flowers from forming, or ruin them after Factors Affecting they have formed. The fungus grows well at warm temperatures but is more capable of spreading through the relatively cool soils in the Pacific Northwest than either of the strains attacking iris or narcissus. Although infection can occur at temperatures as Basal Rot low as 7°C ( 46°F), it increases rapidly above l5°C (58°F). Particularly favorable infection Symptoms periods commonly occur during the last two to LEAVES. Plants in the field may fail to emerge three weeks before harvest. The fungus produces from diseased bulbs or emerge and later become abundant spores at 20-34 °C ( 68-93 oF) when stunted with leaves turning red,
Recommended publications
  • Eb0710 1979.Pdf (3.892Mb)
    Contents Fungus Diseases - - - ------ - - ---- - - ~ - -- -- - ----- --- - --- ----- -- - 3 MOSAIC AND OTHER VIRUSES Iris Severe Mosaic (Yellow or Latent Virus Diseases ----------------------------------------------- 3 Mosaic or Gray Disease) -------------------------- 17 Nematode Diseases ----------------------------------------- 3 Bacterial Diseases ------------------------------------------ 3 MISCELLANEOUS DISEASES AND CONDITIONS Physiological Diseases ------------------------------------ 3 Nematode (Eel worm) --------------------------------- 19 General Control Program ------ -- ------ ---- ------------- 4 Black Storage Molds ------------------------------------ 20 Black Tip _______ _____ ____ ___ _____ ------------------------------ 21 MAJOR DISEASES Botrytis Blight ---------------- --------------------- ----- -------- 21 Blindness (Three Leaf) 4 Suggestions to the Grower ____ ____ ___ ___ _______ __ _ 5 Gray Bulb Rot ----------------------------------------------- 21 Suggestions to the Forcer -------------------------- 6 Pythium Root Rot ----------------------------- ------------ 21 Summary of Forcing Problems _____ ______ ___ ____ _ 7 Rhizoctonia Neck and Bulb Rot _____ ___ ____ _____ __ _ 21 Blasting ------------------------------------------------------- __ 7 Rust -------------------------------------------------------------- __ 22 Bacterial Blight ___ ___ _- ------------------------------------ 8 Sunburn -------------------------------------------------------- 2 2 Black Slime (Black Rot) --------------------- -------- 9 Blue
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Global Flower Bulb Industry
    1 The Global Flower Bulb Industry: Production, Utilization, Research Maarten Benschop Hobaho Testcentrum Hillegom, The Netherlands Rina Kamenetsky Department of Ornamental Horticulture Agricultural Research Organization The Volcani Center Bet Dagan 50250, Israel Marcel Le Nard Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique 29260 Ploudaniel, France Hiroshi Okubo Laboratory of Horticultural Science Kyushu University 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan August De Hertogh Department of Horticultural Science North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 29565-7609, USA COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL I. INTRODUCTION II. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES III. GLOBALIZATION OF THE WORLD FLOWER BULB INDUSTRY A. Utilization and Development of Expanded Markets Horticultural Reviews, Volume 36 Edited by Jules Janick Copyright Ó 2010 Wiley-Blackwell. 1 2 M. BENSCHOP, R. KAMENETSKY, M. LE NARD, H. OKUBO, AND A. DE HERTOGH B. Introduction of New Crops C. International Conventions IV. MAJOR AREAS OF RESEARCH A. Plant Breeding and Genetics 1. Breeders’ Right and Variety Registration 2. Hortus Bulborum: A Germplasm Repository 3. Gladiolus 4. Hyacinthus 5. Iris (Bulbous) 6. Lilium 7. Narcissus 8. Tulipa 9. Other Genera B. Physiology 1. Bulb Production 2. Bulb Forcing and the Flowering Process 3. Morpho- and Physiological Aspects of Florogenesis 4. Molecular Aspects of Florogenesis C. Pests, Physiological Disorders, and Plant Growth Regulators 1. General Aspects for Best Management Practices 2. Diseases of Ornamental Geophytes 3. Insects of Ornamental Geophytes 4. Physiological Disorders of Ornamental Geophytes 5. Exogenous Plant Growth Regulators (PGR) D. Other Research Areas 1. Specialized Facilities and Equipment for Flower Bulbs52 2. Transportation of Flower Bulbs 3. Forcing and Greenhouse Technology V. MAJOR FLOWER BULB ORGANIZATIONS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyler Schmidt, Plant Science Major, Department of Horticultural Science
    Interspecific Breeding for Warm-Winter Tolerance in Tulipa gesneriana L. Tyler Schmidt, Plant Science Major, Department oF Horticultural Science 19 December 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Focus on breeding of Tulipa gesneriana has largely concentrated on appearance. Through interspecific breeding with more warm-tolerant species, tolerance of warm winters could be introduced into the species, decreasing dormancy requirements and expanding the range of tulips southward. Additionally, long-lasting foliage can be favored in breeding to allow plants to store more energy for daughter bulbs. Continued virus and fungal resistance breeding will decrease infection. Primary benefits are for gardeners and landscapers who, under the current planting schedule, are planting tulip bulbs annually, wasting money. Producers benefit from this by reducing cooling times, saving energy, greenhouse space, and tulip bulbs lost to diseases in coolers. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AQUAPONICS: REPORT TITLE 1 I. INTRODUCTION A. Study species Tulips (Tulip gesneriana L.) are one of the most historically significant and well-known horticultural crops in the world. Since entering Europe via Constantinople in the mid-sixteenth century, the Dutch tulip market became one of the first “economic bubbles” of modern civilization, creating and destroying fortunes in four brief years (Lesnaw and Ghabrial, 2000). Since this time, tulips have remained extremely popular as more improved cultivars are released. However, a problem remains: even though viral resistance and long-lasting cultivars are introduced, few are capable of surviving in a climate with truly mild winters and only select cultivars are able to store enough energy for another year of flowering, even in climates with colder winters. Current planting schemes suggest planting annually, wasting tulip bulbs (Dickey, 1954).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers
    R. Kenneth Horst Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers R. Kenneth Horst Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers R. Kenneth Horst Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology Cornell University Ithaca, NY , USA ISBN 978-94-007-6048-6 ISBN 978-94-007-6049-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6049-3 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013935122 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus
    Supplementary Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: The Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus Kiran R. Gadhave 1,2,*,†, Saurabh Gautam 3,†, David A. Rasmussen 2 and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan 3 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]. † Authors contributed equally. Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: date Abstract: Potyviruses are the largest group of plant infecting RNA viruses that cause significant losses in a wide range of crops across the globe. The majority of viruses in the genus Potyvirus are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner and have been extensively studied vis-à-vis their structure, taxonomy, evolution, diagnosis, transmission and molecular interactions with hosts. This comprehensive review exclusively discusses potyviruses and their transmission by aphid vectors, specifically in the light of several virus, aphid and plant factors, and how their interplay influences potyviral binding in aphids, aphid behavior and fitness, host plant biochemistry, virus epidemics, and transmission bottlenecks. We present the heatmap of the global distribution of potyvirus species, variation in the potyviral coat protein gene, and top aphid vectors of potyviruses. Lastly, we examine how the fundamental understanding of these multi-partite interactions through multi-omics approaches is already contributing to, and can have future implications for, devising effective and sustainable management strategies against aphid- transmitted potyviruses to global agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Accumulation of Viral Coat Protein in Chloroplasts of Lily Leaves Infected with Lily Mottled Virus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE & BIOLOGY ISSN Print: 1560–8530; ISSN Online: 1814–9596 17F–036/2017/19–5–1265–1269 DOI: 10.17957/IJAB/15.0436 http://www.fspublishers.org Full Length Article Accumulation of Viral Coat Protein in Chloroplasts of Lily Leaves Infected with Lily Mottled Virus Pinsan Xu1,2, Xiuying Xia1, Jiong Song1 and Zhengyao Zhang2* 1School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian Liaoning 116024, China 2School of Life Science and Medicine, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin Liaoning 124221, China *For correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract The symptoms of Lily mottled virus (LMoV) disease are thought to be caused by metabolic changes in leaf chloroplasts. To observe variations in the ultrastructure of cells and the accumulation of viral coat protein (CP) in lily leaves, we examined ultrathin sections of lily leaves infected by LMoV. Immunogold labeling analysis demonstrated that LMoV-CP was localized to the chloroplasts. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of LMoV-infected lily, which indicating that the accumulation of LMoV-CP in chloroplasts inhibits PSII activity. We investigated the transmembrane transport of LMoV CP by incubating a gradient of this protein. The lowest concentration of LMoV-CP detected was 30 μg mL-1 and the optimal incubation time was 1 min. High levels of LMoV-CP that accumulate inside chloroplasts may affect photosynthesis in virus-infected lily by inhibiting photosystem activity. © 2017 Friends Science Publishers Keywords: Virus infection; Cell ultrastructure; Chloroplasts; Coat protein Introduction CP concentration and time). However, the molecular mechanism underlying how LMoV causing LMoV Lily mottled virus (LMoV) is one of the main viruses symptoms remains unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Viruses That Infect Plants Dr
    Viruses that Infect Plants Dr. Jane E. Polston MCB 4503/5505 Dept. of Plant Pathology 1439 Fifield Hall [email protected] Viruses infect Organisms in All the Main Categories of Life A tree of life. A phylogenetic tree of life based on comparative small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences. Tree of Eukaryotic Life Keeling, PJ, G Burger, DG Durnford, BF Lang, RW Lee, RE Pearlman, AJ Roger, MW Gray. 2005. The tree of eukaryotes. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 670‐676. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.005 Phylogeny of Vascular Plants (Embryophytes) OUTLINE Viruses of Vascular Plants How are viruses that infect plants similar to viruses that infect other organisms? How are viruses that infect plants different from from viruses that infect other organisms? Viruses of plants are found across the earth –wherever plants grow Map of fluorescence indicating the density of growing plants Antarctica http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/fluorescence‐map.html Viruses that infect Vascular Plants: • Highly diverse • Have a high degree of similarity with animal viruses • Have evolved unique genes/ functions to facilitate infection Number and Diversity of Plant Viruses Estimated No. of Total No. Viruses No. Species Known to Virus Species in the Characterized Infect Land Plants World 2011 2011 millions 2,284 1,300 There are millions of diverse viral species in the world (65% of partial viral sequences found have no homologues in GenBank) Edwards and Rohwer (2005) Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3:504 Diversity of Viruses that Infect Vascular Plants Approximately 1,300 distinct virus species
    [Show full text]
  • Shifts in Diversification Rates and Host Jump Frequencies Shaped the Diversity of Host Range Among Sclerotiniaceae Fungal Plant Pathogens
    Original citation: Navaud, Olivier, Barbacci, Adelin, Taylor, Andrew, Clarkson, John P. and Raffaele, Sylvain (2018) Shifts in diversification rates and host jump frequencies shaped the diversity of host range among Sclerotiniaceae fungal plant pathogens. Molecular Ecology . doi:10.1111/mec.14523 Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/100464 Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work of researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. This article is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) and may be reused according to the conditions of the license. For more details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ A note on versions: The version presented in WRAP is the published version, or, version of record, and may be cited as it appears here. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Received: 30 May 2017 | Revised: 26 January 2018 | Accepted: 29 January 2018 DOI: 10.1111/mec.14523 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Shifts in diversification rates and host jump frequencies shaped the diversity of host range among Sclerotiniaceae fungal plant pathogens Olivier Navaud1 | Adelin Barbacci1 | Andrew Taylor2 | John P. Clarkson2 | Sylvain Raffaele1 1LIPM, Universite de Toulouse, INRA, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France Abstract 2Warwick Crop Centre, School of Life The range of hosts that a parasite can infect in nature is a trait determined by its Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, own evolutionary history and that of its potential hosts. However, knowledge on UK host range diversity and evolution at the family level is often lacking.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (4Mb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/67709 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Pathogen Diversity, Epidemiology and Control of Sclerotinia Disease in Vegetable Crops Rachel Julie Warmington A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant and Environmental Sciences The University of Warwick, School of Life Sciences September 2014 Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................ v List of Tables............................................................................................................. xi List of Abbreviations................................................................................................ xv Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. xvi Declaration ............................................................................................................. xvii Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of in Vitro Lily Scale Budlets As Related to Virus Elimination
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Joanne C. Ruttum for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 27, 1991. Title: Development of in vitro Lily Scale Bulblets as Related to Virus Elimination -Redacted for Privacy_ Abstract approved: Thomas C. Allen, Jr. Lily hybrids vary in their ability toproduce virus-free (VF) bulblets when grown fromvirus-infected scalesintissue culture. Asiatic hybrids typically produce a higher percentage of in vitro VFscale bulblets than do Lilium longiflorum cultivars. Three hypotheses concerning the cause of this variation are tested onfive lily hybrids: an Asiatic hybrid, two L. longiflorum cultivars, an Oriental hybrid and L. candidum. The first hypothesis states that VFscale bulblets originate from wound tissue that is naturallylow in virus concentration and blocks the passage of virusparticles from one cell to the next. The second hypothesis says that scale-to-bulblet vascular connections, which serve asvirus pathways, occur inhybrids showing high percentages of virus-infected scale bulblets, while connections are absent in those hybridswithlow numbersof virus-infected bulblets. The third hypothesis concerns the virus concentration in the scale at the site of bulblet origin: bulblets of hybrids producing large numbers of VF bulblets originate from scale tissues low in virus concentration; bulblets of low percentage VF bulblet hybrids originate from scale tissues high in virus concentration. The first two hypotheses are not supported by the results of thisstudy. First, lily bulblets do not originate from wound tissue. Second,scale-to-bulblet vascular connections consistently occur in 'Enchantment,' an Asiatic hybrid, and occasionally occur in L. candidum.
    [Show full text]
  • Interceptation of Viruses on Foreign Tulips in Brazil
    InterceptationSCIENTIFIC of viruses COMMUNICATION on foreign tulips in Brazil. 501 INTERCEPTATION OF VIRUSES ON FOREIGN TULIPS IN BRAZIL E.B. Rivas, S.R. Galleti, M.A.V. Alexandre, L.M.L. Duarte, C.M. Chagas Instituto Biológico, Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Sanidade Vegetal, Av. Cons. Rodrigues Alves, 1252, CEP 04014-002, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Sixty-seven tulip samples intercepted from the Netherlands by the Brazilian Agriculture Ministry, between 2004 and 2006, and two samples from São Paulo local market, Brazil, were assayed by serological and biological techniques, as well as by electron microscopy observations, for virus screening. In bulbs from the Netherlands potexviruses were detected in five samples and tobamoviruses in other three. Symptoms induced in some differential hosts were similar to those caused by Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), while serological results indicated an infection by Tulip virus X. In two tulip samples from local flower shops, a Potyviridae was identified based on the presence of flexuous particles and cytoplasmic cylindrical inclusions. Mechanical transmission tests to potyvirus hosts in the Amaranthaceae, Chenopodiaceae and Solanaceae species were negative, making possible to exclude a possible infection by Turnip mosaic viru, a common virus species in tulips. Although TVX could be detected in intercepted tulip bulbs from the Netherlands, the virus is only reported in Scotland, Japan and USA. KEY WORDS: Ornamental plant, Potexvirus, Tobamovirus, Potyviridae. RESUMO INTERCEPTAÇÃO DE VÍRUS EM TULIPAS IMPORTADAS PELO BRASIL. Sessenta e sete amostras de tulipas interceptadas da Holanda pelo Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abaste- cimento, entre os anos de 2004 e 2006, e duas amostras, adquiridas no comércio local de São Paulo, foram avaliadas para a presença de vírus por meio de ensaios biológicos, sorológicos e observações ao microscópio eletrônico.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Broken'tulips and Tulip Breaking Virus
    ‘Broken’tulips and Tulip breaking virus ue to their beauty, range popular in Europe and, soon after, of colours and early bulbs were distributed from Vienna to flowering, tulips have Augsberg, Antwerp and Amsterdam, remained popular as and subsequently to other European garden plants and cut cities. blooms since they were DDfirst imported into Europe from Asia Tulip breaking virus Minor and Persia more than four and a Of the viruses now known to infect half centuries ago. Their introduction is tulips and cause ‘breaking’, the best usually attributed to Ogier de Bus- known is Tulip breaking virus (TBV) becque who, in 1554, first sent tulip which induces leaf chlorosis and, in bulbs and seeds to Vienna. This, of coloured cultivars, ‘broken’ flowers. course, was only a few years after the Breaking, or rectification as it was also deaths of great historical figures such earlier known, describes the appear- as Henry VIII, Martin Luther, Pope ance of the flowers in which the petals, Clement VII and Francis I of France, instead of being uniformly coloured, and when Tsar Ivan IV (Ivan the are variegated due to the irregular Terrible) was at his most powerful. It distribution of anthocyanin. Such is interesting that Busbecque, Ambas- ‘broken’ flowers are known to have ᭡ Illustration of ‘Tulip cv. Semper Augustus’ sador of Ferdinand I, the Holy Roman occurred in tulips in Europe within a taken from The Tulip Book (circa 1630– Emperor, to the great Sultan Souleiman, decade or so of their introduction and It’s hard to believe that in the 17th century people yearned 1639).
    [Show full text]