DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Berkeley Berkeley Undergraduate Journal of Classics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UC Berkeley Berkeley Undergraduate Journal of Classics Title The Liminal and Universal: Changing Interpretations of Hekate Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1071z9t4 Journal Berkeley Undergraduate Journal of Classics, 5(1) ISSN 2373-7115 Author Ou, Adrienne Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Undergraduate eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Liminal and Universal: Changing Interpretations of Hekate Adrienne Ou University of California, Los Angeles Political Science and Classical Civilization Class of 2016 Abstract: Hekate is considered one of the most enigmatic figures of Greek religion. In the Theogony, she is referred to as a universal goddess. Nevertheless, her figure transforms into that of a chthonic figure, associated with witchcraft and the restless dead. This paper examines how Hekate’s role in the Greek pantheon has changed over time, and with what figures she has been syncretized or associated with in order to bring about such changes. In doing so, three images of the same goddess emerge: Hekate the universal life-bringing deity, Hekate the liminal goddess of the crossroads, and Hekate the chthonic overseer of witchcraft and angry spirits. INTRODUCTION Hekate is an enigmatic figure in Greco-Roman mythology, having evolved over the centuries from a universal deity to a chthonic figure. Due to the Greco-Roman practice of religious syncretism, her figure has taken on aspects of other gods. Likewise, other gods have absorbed some aspects originally attributed to her. Consequentially, she has many aspects and is associated with different deities. This is emphasized by the fact that as a goddess of liminality, she not only separates realms lorded over by different gods, but serves as a transition goddess for said realms. Therefore she links gods together, functioning as the sinew of the cosmos. Ergo, Hekate should not be viewed as a single figure but rather as a tripartite figure that has evolved over time. I will first discuss her origins and her role as an all-giving universal deity in Asia Minor, in the Theogony, and in the Chaldean Oracles. Within this section, I will discuss her connections with Zeus, Poseidon, Hades, and Apollo. Next, this paper will describe her role as a liminal figure as evidenced in the “Homeric Hymn to Demeter” and her connection to the Eleusinian Rites. By corollary, it will also introduce Hekate’s links to Demeter and Persephone. I will also discuss her overlapping responsibilities with Hermes in this section. This paper will finish with a discussion of Hekate as a chthonic figure: first, her role as the mistress of vengeful spirits, her lordship over magic and crossroads, and through the link between Hekate and the trope of the dying maiden. In this section, I will discuss Hekate’s role as kourotrophos and her similarities to Artemis. In doing so, I will show that one of Hekate’s many aspects as a universal figure was that of a mediator of boundaries and a liminal figure. Over time, as the archaic period gave way to the classical period and pan-Hellenism increased along with religious syncretism, Hekate’s liminal role increasingly defined her aspects and entire nature. Because liminality was deeply associated with boundaries and crossroads as well as the great boundary between life and death, Hekate increasingly transformed from a liminal figure to a chthonic figure associated with vengeful spirits and the unearthly. Hekate’s enigma stems from the fact that her aspects were manifold and transformed over time, as she took on other gods’ aspects and had certain aspects subsumed by others over time. HEKATE THE UNIVERSAL FIGURE Most scholars agree that Hekate originated from Caria in Asia Minor despite limited archaeological evidence. Most of her cult temples are located there and are given names beginning with hekat-.1 More importantly, she was pictured as a single figure instead of a tripartite figure, as she was commonly depicted since the fifth century BCE.2 As such, the length and extent of the single-bodied version of Hekate there indicates that she was originally a Carian goddess assimilated into the Greek pantheon via religious syncretism. There, her main epithets included: megistē (“greatest”), epiphanestē (“most manifest”), and sōteira (“savior”).3 WE can conclude that Hekate was the principal goddess worshipped there, similar to how Athena was the principal goddess of the Attican polis Athens. Before the Indo-Europeans arrived in Greece and brought with them the Olympian pantheon led by Zeus, most Mediterranean civilizations worshiped a great earth goddess. Prior to Zeus supplanting her role, Hekate was an example of this figure. In the “Hymn to Hekate,” a digression among descriptions of the genealogy of various Titans, the brewing Titanomachy, and the birth of the Olympians, Hesiod spends a good forty lines praising the goddess. No other deity is so honored in the Theogony except Zeus.4 Hesiod claims that Hekate receives: “A share of the earth as her own, and of the barren sea. / She has received a province of starry heaven as well … She has a share of the privileges of all the gods / That were ever born of Earth and Heaven.”5 Hekate is a singular figure in the Theogony: she is a Titan, and yet she is not thrown into Tartaros but allowed to maintain her titles, and have even more titles bestowed upon her by Zeus. Moreover, unlike the other ouranic deities that have a specific domain of their own, she partakes in a share of all the domains that the pantheon rules over. The sky god supplanted the earth goddess as the primary deity of worship when the Indo-Europeans moved into the Mediterranean region, as evidenced from disparate mythologies like the Epic of Gilgamesh in Sumerian mythos and the Theogony itself. In these narratives, an earth goddess serves as a central figure and is opposed by a rising sky god. Eventually, the sky god replaces the previous pantheon and becomes the leader of the new order. Hekate is not part of the Indo-European ouranic pantheon but rather a goddess associated with the Titans, the overthrown pantheon of uncivilized giants. Her pre-Indo-European arrival status was permanently disturbed by the arrival of the new settlers and their gods. Although her importance is diminished in the new pantheon, she is still associated with many aspects of a life giving earth goddess and becomes a more general figure loosely delineating the cosmos. As such, Hesiod fits Hekate’s previous roles as universal goddess and primary deity in Caria into the new Indo-European religious framework. Her function as a universal goddess results from the fact that she has many aspects and many domains. Hesiod describes eight classes of people she specifically helps: participants in 1 Berg, William. “”Hecate: Greek or ‘Anatolian’?” Numen 21 (1974): 128-129. Marquardt, Patricia A. “A Portrait of Hecate,” The American Journal of Philology 102.3 (1981): 250-251. 2 Berg (1974) 130. 3 Johnston, Sarah Iles. “Hekate and the Dying Maiden,” in Restless Dead: Encounters Between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press (2013). 205-206. 4 Boedecker, Deborah. “Hecate: A Transfunctional Goddess in the Theogony?” Transactions of the American Philological Association 113 (1983): 80. 5 Hesiod, lines 415-416 & 423-424 in the “Hymn to Hecate,” from Theogony, in Anthology of Classical Myth: Primary Sources in Translation, ed. Stephen M. Trzaskoma, R. Scott Smith, and Stephen Brunet. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. (2004). Pages 143-144. sacrificial ritual, kings, warriors, athletes, cavalrymen, fishermen, herdsmen, and kouroi.6 Boedecker uses Dumezil’s tripartite system in which society and mythology are divided into three functions to analyze Hekate the trivalent goddess. Firstly, she helps enforce magical- religious and legal-contractual sovereignty. Secondly, she assists warriors and cavalrymen at war, and athletes in competition. Thirdly, she helps fishermen, herdsmen, and kouroi, all of whom pertain to fertility and productivity for society. Dumezil’s tripartite system also extends beyond social groups to cosmic levels: heaven, atmosphere, and earth.7 As previously described, Hekate takes a share of Zeus’s domain (sky), Poseidon’s domain (sea), and Hades’ domain (earth/underground). In various Indo-European mythologies, there are structural similarities where a female divinity bridges the separate domains of three male deities, and in doing so, connects them together as to create a single world out of the immense diversity of domains and gods.8 As Lyle describes it: “The goddess as trivalent is active in all three functions … she is active at all three of the superimposed levels of the cosmos, and so the vertical triad is not a simple one of three male components; it consists of the three male components and the female whole interfused in each part.”9 As such, Hekate is not just a great goddess assimilated into a new structure, but plays an important part in the new Indo-European structure of bridging the cosmos together. To better understand how she functions as a goddess in terms of religious practice, she is best thought of an intermediary. As the gods increasingly became transcendent and removed from everyday life in the classical period, the role of transitional and intermediary deities increased.10 Her role in many domains is to regulate communication between man and god, similar to Apollo.11 Both deities were considered to be the main divinities for divine messages. As such, Hekate was considered to be an ambivalent figure whose good will or ill will determined the success of prayer and other rituals: “I pray to Hermes to increase my flocks or to Zeus for victory. Both Hermes and Zeus surely have the requisite power to accomplish my wish; yet my prayer may or may not be answered.
Recommended publications
  • The Dawn in Erewhon"

    The Dawn in Erewhon"

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons CUREJ - College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal College of Arts and Sciences December 2007 Dimensions of Erewhon: The Modern Orpheus in Guy Davenport's "The Dawn in Erewhon" Patrick Dillon [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej Recommended Citation Dillon, Patrick, "Dimensions of Erewhon: The Modern Orpheus in Guy Davenport's "The Dawn in Erewhon"" 10 December 2007. CUREJ: College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, University of Pennsylvania, https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/23. Revised version, posted 10 December 2007. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/23 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dimensions of Erewhon: The Modern Orpheus in Guy Davenport's "The Dawn in Erewhon" Abstract In "The Dawn in Erewhon", the concluding novella of Tatlin!, Guy Davenport explores the myth of Orpheus in the context of two storylines: Adriaan van Hovendaal, a thinly veiled version of Ludwig Wittgenstein, and an updated retelling of Samuel Butler's utopian novel Erewhon. Davenport tells the story in a disjunctive style and uses the Orpheus myth as a symbol to refer to a creative sensibility that has been lost in modern technological civilization but is recoverable through art. Keywords Charles Bernstein, Bernstein, Charles, English, Guy Davenport, Davenport, Orpheus, Tatlin, Dawn in Erewhon, Erewhon, ludite, luditism Comments Revised version, posted 10 December 2007. This article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/23 Dimensions of Erewhon The Modern Orpheus in Guy Davenport’s “The Dawn in Erewhon” Patrick Dillon Introduction: The Assemblage Style Although Tatlin! is Guy Davenport’s first collection of fiction, it is the work of a fully mature artist.
  • Herakles Iconography on Tyrrhenian Amphorae

    Herakles Iconography on Tyrrhenian Amphorae

    HERAKLES ICONOGRAPHY ON TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE _____________________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia _____________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts ______________________________________________ by MEGAN LYNNE THOMSEN Dr. Susan Langdon, Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Susan Langdon, and the other members of my committee, Dr. Marcus Rautman and Dr. David Schenker, for their help during this process. Also, thanks must be given to my family and friends who were a constant support and listening ear this past year. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS……………………………………………………………..v Chapter 1. TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE—A BRIEF STUDY…..……………………....1 Early Studies Characteristics of Decoration on Tyrrhenian Amphorae Attribution Studies: Identifying Painters and Workshops Market Considerations Recent Scholarship The Present Study 2. HERAKLES ON TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE………………………….…30 Herakles in Vase-Painting Herakles and the Amazons Herakles, Nessos and Deianeira Other Myths of Herakles Etruscan Imitators and Contemporary Vase-Painting 3. HERAKLES AND THE FUNERARY CONTEXT………………………..…48 Herakles in Etruria Etruscan Concepts of Death and the Underworld Etruscan Funerary Banquets and Games 4. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………..67 iii APPENDIX: Herakles Myths on Tyrrhenian Amphorae……………………………...…72 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………..77 ILLUSTRATIONS………………………………………………………………………82 iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Tyrrhenian Amphora by Guglielmi Painter. Bloomington, IUAM 73.6. Herakles fights Nessos (Side A), Four youths on horseback (Side B). Photos taken by Megan Thomsen 82 2. Tyrrhenian Amphora (Beazley #310039) by Fallow Deer Painter. Munich, Antikensammlungen 1428. Photo CVA, MUNICH, MUSEUM ANTIKER KLEINKUNST 7, PL. 322.3 83 3. Tyrrhenian Amphora (Beazley #310045) by Timiades Painter (name vase).
  • Aspects of the Demeter/Persephone Myth in Modern Fiction

    Aspects of the Demeter/Persephone Myth in Modern Fiction

    Aspects of the Demeter/Persephone myth in modern fiction Janet Catherine Mary Kay Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy (Ancient Cultures) at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Dr Sjarlene Thom December 2006 I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it at any university for a degree. Signature: ………………………… Date: ……………… 2 THE DEMETER/PERSEPHONE MYTH IN MODERN FICTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction: The Demeter/Persephone Myth in Modern Fiction 4 1.1 Theories for Interpreting the Myth 7 2. The Demeter/Persephone Myth 13 2.1 Synopsis of the Demeter/Persephone Myth 13 2.2 Commentary on the Demeter/Persephone Myth 16 2.3 Interpretations of the Demeter/Persephone Myth, Based on Various 27 Theories 3. A Fantasy Novel for Teenagers: Treasure at the Heart of the Tanglewood 38 by Meredith Ann Pierce 3.1 Brown Hannah – Winter 40 3.2 Green Hannah – Spring 54 3.3 Golden Hannah – Summer 60 3.4 Russet Hannah – Autumn 67 4. Two Modern Novels for Adults 72 4.1 The novel: Chocolat by Joanne Harris 73 4.2 The novel: House of Women by Lynn Freed 90 5. Conclusion 108 5.1 Comparative Analysis of Identified Motifs in the Myth 110 References 145 3 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The question that this thesis aims to examine is how the motifs of the myth of Demeter and Persephone have been perpetuated in three modern works of fiction, which are Treasure at the Heart of the Tanglewood by Meredith Ann Pierce, Chocolat by Joanne Harris and House of Women by Lynn Freed.
  • Chthonic Aspects of Macdonald's Phantastes: from the Rising of The

    Chthonic Aspects of Macdonald's Phantastes: from the Rising of The

    Chthonic Aspects of MacDonald’s Phantastes: From the Rising of the Goddess to the Anodos of Anodos Fernando Soto The Herios was a woman’s festival. Plutarch of course could not be present at the secret ceremonies of the Thyaiades, but his friend Thyia, their president, would tell him all a man might know . From the rites known to him he promptly conjectured that it was a “Bringing up of Semele.” Semele, it is acknowledged, is but a Thraco-Phrygian form of Gaia, The “Bringing up of Semele” is but the Anodos of Gala or of Kore the Earth Maiden. It is the Return of the vegetation or Year-Spirit in the spring. (Jane Harrison, Themis 416) 1. Introduction and General Backgrounds hantastes is one of the most mysterious books George MacDonald wrote andP one of the least understood books in the English tradition. Since its publication in 1858, reviewers, readers and researchers have experienced great difficulties understanding the meaning of this complex work.The perceived impediments have been so great that some scholars remain unsure whether Phantastes contains a coherent plot or structure (Reis 87, 89, 93-94; Robb 85, 97; etc.). Other critics appear adamant that it contains neither (Wolff 50; Manlove, Modern 55, 71, 77, 79; England 65, 93, 122). Even those scholars who sense a structure or perceive a plot differ not only regarding the types of structure(s) and/or plot(s) they acknowledge (Docherty 17-22; McGillis “Community” 51-63; Gunther “First Two” 32-42), but in deciding into what, if any, genres or traditions Phantastes belongs (Prickett, “Bildungsroman” 109-23; Docherty 19, 23, 30, McGillis, “Femininity” 31-45; etc.).
  • Hesiod Theogony.Pdf

    Hesiod Theogony.Pdf

    Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on.
  • University of Groningen the Sacrifice of Pregnant Animals Bremmer, Jan N

    University of Groningen the Sacrifice of Pregnant Animals Bremmer, Jan N

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen The Sacrifice of Pregnant Animals Bremmer, Jan N. Published in: Greek Sacrificial Ritual: Olympian and Chthonian IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Bremmer, J. N. (2005). The Sacrifice of Pregnant Animals. In B. Alroth, & R. Hägg (Eds.), Greek Sacrificial Ritual: Olympian and Chthonian (pp. 155-165). Gothenburg: Paul Astroms Forlag. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 12-11-2019 THE SACRIFICE OF PREGNANT ANIMALS by JAN N. BREMMER There has recently been renewed interest in Olympian sacrifice and its chthonian counterparts, 1 but much less attention has been paid to its more unusual variants.
  • The Hecate of the Theogony Jenny Strauss Clay

    The Hecate of the Theogony Jenny Strauss Clay

    STRAUSS CALY, JENNY, The Hecate of the "Theogony" , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 25:1 (1984) p.27 The Hecate of the Theogony Jenny Strauss Clay EAR THE MIDDLE of the Theogony, Hesiod appears to drop N everything in order to launch into an extended encomium of Hecate (411-52). Because of its length and apparent lack of integration into its context, but above all because of the peculiar terms of praise reserved for the goddess, the so-called "Hymn to Hecate" has often been dismissed as an intrusion into the Hesiodic text.l To be sure, voices have also been raised in defense,2 and, at present, the passage stands unbracketed in the editions of Mazon, Solmsen, and West.3 But questions remain even if the authenticity of the lines is acknowledged. Why does Hesiod devote so much space to so minor a deity? What is the origin and function of Hesiod's Hecate, and what role does she play in the poem ?4 1 Most notably by U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Der Glaube der Hellenen I (Berlin 1931) 172. Wilamowitz is followed by M. P. Nilsson, Geschichte der griechischen Re/igion 3 I (Munich 1969) 723. Condemnation is fairly universal among earlier editors. Cf 0. Gruppe, Ueber die Theogonie des Hesiod (Berlin 1841) 72; G. Schoemann, Die He­ siodische Theogonie (Berlin 1868) 190, who, after many good observations, concludes that the passage is a later interpolation; H. Flach, Die Hesiodische Theogonie (Berlin 1873) 81; A. Fick, Hesiods Gedichte (Gottingen 1887) 17 ("Der Verfasser war ein Or­ phiker"); F.
  • On the Anatolian Origin of Ancient Greek Σίδη

    On the Anatolian Origin of Ancient Greek Σίδη

    GRAECO-LATINA BRUNENSIA 19, 2014, 2 KRZYSZTOF TOMASZ WITCZAK (UNIVERSITY OF ŁÓDŹ) MAŁGORZATA ZADKA (UNIVERSITY OF WROCŁAW) ON THE ANATOLIAN ORIGIN OF ANCIENT GREEK ΣΊΔΗ The comparison of Greek words for ‘pomegranate, Punica granatum L.’ (Gk. σίδᾱ, σίδη, σίβδᾱ, σίβδη, ξίμβᾱ f.) with Hittite GIŠšaddu(wa)- ‘a kind of fruit-tree’ indi- cates a possible borrowing of the Greek forms from an Anatolian source. Key words: Greek botanical terminology, pomegranate, borrowings, Anatolian languages. In this article we want to continue the analysis initiated in our article An- cient Greek σίδη as a Borrowing from a Pre-Greek Substratum (WITCZAK – ZADKA 2014: 113–126). The Greek word σίδη f. ‘pomegranate’ is attested in many dialectal forms, which differ a lot from each other what cause some difficulties in determining the possible origin of σίδη. The phonetic struc- ture of the word without a doubt is not of Hellenic origin and it is rather a loan word. It also seems to be related to some Anatolian forms, but this similarity corresponds to a lack of the exact attested words for ‘pomegran- ate’ in Anatolian languages. 1. A Semitic hypothesis No Semitic explanation of Gk. σίδη is possible. The Semitic term for ‘pomegranate’, *rimān-, is perfectly attested in Assyrian armânu, Akka- dian lurmu, Hebrew rimmōn, Arabic rummān ‘id.’1, see also Egyptian (NK) 1 A Semitic name appears in the codex Parisinus Graecus 2419 (26, 18): ποϊρουμάν · ἡ ῥοιά ‘pomegranate’ (DELATTE 1930: 84) < Arabic rummān ‘id.’. This Byzantine 132 KRZYSZTOF TOMASZ WITCZAK, MAŁGORZATA ZADKA rrm.t ‘a kind of fruit’, Coptic erman, herman ‘pomegranate’ (supposedly from Afro-Asiatic *riman- ‘fruit’, esp.
  • Leto As Mother: Representations of Leto with Apollo and Artemis in Attic Vase Painting of the Fifth Century B.C

    Leto As Mother: Representations of Leto with Apollo and Artemis in Attic Vase Painting of the Fifth Century B.C

    https://publications.dainst.org iDAI.publications ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATIONEN DES DEUTSCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTS Dies ist ein digitaler Sonderdruck des Beitrags / This is a digital offprint of the article Lavinia Foukara Leto as Mother: Representations of Leto with Apollo and Artemis in Attic Vase Painting of the Fifth Century B.C. aus / from Archäologischer Anzeiger Ausgabe / Issue Seite / Page 63–83 https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa/2027/6626 • urn:nbn:de:0048-journals.aa-2017-1-p63-83-v6626.5 Verantwortliche Redaktion / Publishing editor Redaktion der Zentrale | Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Weitere Informationen unter / For further information see https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa ISSN der Online-Ausgabe / ISSN of the online edition 2510-4713 ISSN der gedruckten Ausgabe / ISSN of the printed edition Verlag / Publisher Ernst Wasmuth Verlag GmbH & Co. Tübingen ©2019 Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale, Podbielskiallee 69–71, 14195 Berlin, Tel: +49 30 187711-0 Email: [email protected] / Web: dainst.org Nutzungsbedingungen: Mit dem Herunterladen erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen (https://publications.dainst.org/terms-of-use) von iDAI.publications an. Die Nutzung der Inhalte ist ausschließlich privaten Nutzerinnen / Nutzern für den eigenen wissenschaftlichen und sonstigen privaten Gebrauch gestattet. Sämtliche Texte, Bilder und sonstige Inhalte in diesem Dokument unterliegen dem Schutz des Urheberrechts gemäß dem Urheberrechtsgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Inhalte können von Ihnen nur dann genutzt und vervielfältigt werden, wenn Ihnen dies im Einzelfall durch den Rechteinhaber oder die Schrankenregelungen des Urheberrechts gestattet ist. Jede Art der Nutzung zu gewerblichen Zwecken ist untersagt. Zu den Möglichkeiten einer Lizensierung von Nutzungsrechten wenden Sie sich bitte direkt an die verantwortlichen Herausgeberinnen/Herausgeber der entsprechenden Publikationsorgane oder an die Online-Redaktion des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts ([email protected]).
  • Download Article (PDF)

    Download Article (PDF)

    Miguel Valério University of Barcelona; [email protected] ̔΋ΌЁΙΓΖΒΘΚ and word-initial lambdacism in Anatolian Greek The lexical pair formed by Mycenaean da-pu(2)-ri-to- and later Greek ΦΜΝВΪΤΧΣΩΫ presents a contrast between Linear B d and alphabetical Φ in a position where one would expect to find a similar sound represented. This orthographic inconsistency has been taken as a synchronic fluctuation between /d/ and /l/, both optimal adaptations of what is assumed to be a non- Greek (Minoan) sound in da-pu(2)-ri-to-. In turn, it has been proposed that this “special” and wholly theoretical sound, which according to some suggestions was a coronal fricative, was behind the Linear A d series. Here it is argued that there is actually no evidence that /d/ and /l/ alternated synchronically in Mycenaean Greek, and that therefore the /l-/ of ΦΜΝВΪΤΧΣΩΫ is more likely the result of a later shift. Starting from this premise, it is hypothesized that ΦΜΝВΪΤΧΣΩΫ derives from a form closer to Mycenaean da-pu(2)-ri-to-, an unattested *ΟΜΝВΪΤΧΣΩΫ, that underwent a shift /d-/ > /l-/ in Southern or Western Anatolia. The pro- posed motivation is the influence of some local Anatolian language that prohibited /d/ word- initially. The same development is considered for ΦηίΧ΢ and ΦϲάΥΩΫ, which Hesychius glossed as Pergaean (Pamphylian) forms of standard Greek ΟηίΧ΢ ‘sweet bay’ and ΟϲάΥΩΫ ‘discus, quoit’, and possibly also for the Cimmerian personal name Dugdammê/̥ВΞΟΜ÷ΤΫ. Of course, this hypothesis has implications for our perception of the Linear A d series and certain open questions that concern the Aegean-Cypriot syllabaries.
  • Year 8 English Summer Term: Myths, Legends, Heroes and Villains Structural Figurative Grammar: the Key Figures in Mythology Techniques Language Structural Features

    Year 8 English Summer Term: Myths, Legends, Heroes and Villains Structural Figurative Grammar: the Key Figures in Mythology Techniques Language Structural Features

    Year 8 English Summer Term: Myths, Legends, Heroes and Villains Structural Figurative Grammar: The Key Figures in Mythology Techniques Language Structural Features Exposition – start of the Simile – comparing one Noun – naming word Izanami and Izanagi – From the Japanese creation myth, these story introducing the thing to another using Noun Phrase – a group two gods created land and the seas that make up the earth, characters and setting like or as. of words that act like a using a powerful spear. Denouement – the Metaphor - where noun ending/resolution. something becomes Verb – doing word Zeus is the Olympian god of the sky and the thunder, the king Shift – a change in the something else Prepositional Phrases of all other gods and men, and, consequently, the chief figure direction of the text Personification - giving - a group f words in Greek mythology. Position – where something inanimate starting with a something is placed in a (not human) human preposition and Medusa – In Greek mythology, Medusa was a monster, a text characteristics ending with a noun Gorgon, generally described as a winged human female with Digression – heading Alliteration – using the Adverbs – describe a living venomous snakes in place of hair. Gazers upon her face away from the main Onomatopoeia – words verb (how something would turn to stone. focus of the text that sound like they are is done). Flashback – going back said aloud Adjectives – describe Apollo is one of the most important and complex of the in time Imagery – creating a a noun Olympian gods in Greek and mythology. Apollo has been Flash forward – going picture in your mind variously recognised as a god of music, truth and prophecy, forward in time.
  • Thetis-Hebrew.Pdf

    Thetis-Hebrew.Pdf

    Thetis Not be confused with the sea-goddess Tethys, or Themis, 1 Thetis as goddess the embodiment of law. For other uses, see Thetis (dis- ambiguation) Most extant material about Thetis concerns her role as “Thetys” redirects here. For the animal genus, see Thetys mother of Achilles, but there is some evidence that as the (salp). sea-goddess she played a more central role in the religious Thetis (/ˈθɛtɪs/; Ancient Greek: Θέτις, [tʰétis]), is en- beliefs and practices of Archaic Greece. The pre-modern etymology of her name, from tithemi (τίθημι), “to set up, establish,” suggests a perception among Classical Greeks of an early political role. Walter Burkert[3] considers her name a transformed doublet of Tethys. In Iliad I, Achilles recalls to his mother her role in de- fending, and thus legitimizing, the reign of Zeus against an incipient rebellion by three Olympians, each of whom has pre-Olympian roots: You alone of all the gods saved Zeus the Darkener of the Skies from an inglorious fate, when some of the other Olympians—Hera, Poseidon, and Pallas Athene—had plotted to throw him into chains... You, goddess, went and saved him from that indignity. You quickly summoned to high Olympus the monster of the hundred arms whom the gods call Briareus, but mankind Aegaeon,[4] a giant more power- ful even than his father. He squatted by the Son Head of Thetis from an Attic red-figure pelike, c. 510–500 BC, of Cronos with such a show of force that the Louvre. blessed gods slunk off in terror, leaving Zeus countered in Greek mythology mostly as a sea nymph or free known as the goddess of water, one of the fifty Nereids, —E.V.