DOCSLIB.ORG

Watershed Sanitary Survey Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Watershed Sanitary Survey Final Watershed Sanitary Survey Final Modesto Irrigation District and Stanislaus Regional Water Authority September 30, 2020 Watershed Sanitary Survey Modesto Irrigation District and Stanislaus Regional Water Authority Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................viii Watershed Sanitary Survey Executive Summary .......................................................................................................xiii Background ......................................................................................................................................................xiii Water Supply Systems .....................................................................................................................................xiii Upstream Watersheds ...................................................................................................................................... xiv Significant Potential Contaminant Sources and Source Water Quality Recommendations .............................. xv Don Pedro Reservoir .............................................................................................................................. xv Modesto Reservoir ............................................................................................................................... xvii Lower Tuolumne River Watershed .....................................................................................................xviii Invasive Species .................................................................................................................................... xix Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................................. xx 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Objectives .............................................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Conduct of the Study ............................................................................................................................1-2 1.4 Report Content and Organization .........................................................................................................1-2 2 Watershed Study Areas and Water Supply Systems ........................................................................................2-1 2.1 Watershed Sanitary Survey Study Area Descriptions ...........................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Don Pedro Reservoir Subwatershed Study Area Description .................................................2-2 2.1.2 Modesto Reservoir and Upper Main Canal Watershed Description .......................................2-6 2.1.3 Lower Tuolumne River Subwatershed Description ..............................................................2-13 2.2 Watershed Sanitary Survey Summaries ..............................................................................................2-20 2.2.1 SFPUC Hetch Hetchy Reservoir Watershed Sanitary Survey ..............................................2-20 2.2.2 Don Pedro Recreation Agency Don Pedro Reservoir Watershed Sanitary Survey ..............2-25 2.2.3 TID Lower Tuolumne River and Turlock Lake Watershed Sanitary Survey .......................2-25 2.2.4 MID 2014 Modesto Reservoir Watershed Sanitary Survey ..................................................2-26 2.3 MID Water System .............................................................................................................................2-27 2.3.1 System Facilities ...................................................................................................................2-27 2.4 SRWA Water System .........................................................................................................................2-31 2.4.1 System Facilities ...................................................................................................................2-31 2.4.2 Emergency Plans ..................................................................................................................2-32 3 Potential Contaminant Sources ........................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Wastewater............................................................................................................................................3-1 3.1.1 Potential Contaminant Sources ...............................................................................................3-1 3.1.2 Water Quality Concerns .......................................................................................................3-10 3.1.3 Watershed Management .......................................................................................................3-10 3.2 Septic Tank Systems ...........................................................................................................................3-11 3.2.1 Potential Contaminant Sources .............................................................................................3-12 3.2.2 Water Quality Concerns .......................................................................................................3-14 3.2.3 Watershed Management .......................................................................................................3-14 3.3 Urban Runoff ......................................................................................................................................3-15 3.3.1 Potential Contaminant Sources .............................................................................................3-15 3.3.2 Water Quality Concerns .......................................................................................................3-17 3.3.3 Watershed Management .......................................................................................................3-18 September 30, 2020 i Watershed Sanitary Survey Modesto Irrigation District and Stanislaus Regional Water Authority 3.4 Recreational Use .................................................................................................................................3-18 3.4.1 Potential Contaminant Sources .............................................................................................3-18 3.4.2 Water Quality Concerns .......................................................................................................3-26 3.4.3 Watershed Management .......................................................................................................3-27 3.5 Agricultural Crop Land Use ................................................................................................................3-30 3.5.1 Potential Contaminant Sources .............................................................................................3-30 3.5.2 Water Quality Concerns .......................................................................................................3-34 3.5.3 Watershed Management .......................................................................................................3-35 3.6 Grazing Animals and Confined Animal Facilities ..............................................................................3-35 3.6.1 Potential Contaminant Sources .............................................................................................3-36 3.6.2 Water Quality Concerns .......................................................................................................3-37 3.6.3 Watershed Management .......................................................................................................3-38 3.7 Wild Animals ......................................................................................................................................3-38 3.7.1 Potential Contaminant Sources .............................................................................................3-38 3.7.2 Water Quality Concerns .......................................................................................................3-39 3.7.3 Watershed Management .......................................................................................................3-39 3.8 Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities ..................................................................................3-39 3.8.1 Potential Contaminant Sources .............................................................................................3-40 3.8.2 Water Quality Concerns .......................................................................................................3-42 3.8.3 Watershed Management .......................................................................................................3-42 3.9 Hazardous Materials Storage ..............................................................................................................3-42 3.9.1 Potential Contaminant Sources .............................................................................................3-42 3.9.2 Water Quality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The George Wright Forum
    The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 34 number 3 • 2017 Society News, Notes & Mail • 243 Announcing the Richard West Sellars Fund for the Forum Jennifer Palmer • 245 Letter from Woodstock Values We Hold Dear Rolf Diamant • 247 Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage Rebecca Conard and John H. Sprinkle, Jr., guest editors Dedication•252 Planned Obsolescence: Maintenance of the National Park Service’s History Infrastructure John H. Sprinkle, Jr. • 254 Shining Light on Civil War Battlefield Preservation and Interpretation: From the “Dark Ages” to the Present at Stones River National Battlefield Angela Sirna • 261 Farming in the Sweet Spot: Integrating Interpretation, Preservation, and Food Production at National Parks Cathy Stanton • 275 The Changing Cape: Using History to Engage Coastal Residents in Community Conversations about Climate Change David Glassberg • 285 Interpreting the Contributions of Chinese Immigrants in Yosemite National Park’s History Yenyen F. Chan • 299 Nānā I Ke Kumu (Look to the Source) M. Melia Lane-Kamahele • 308 A Perilous View Shelton Johnson • 315 (continued) Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage (cont’d) Some Challenges of Preserving and Exhibiting the African American Experience: Reflections on Working with the National Park Service and the Carter G. Woodson Home National Historic Site Pero Gaglo Dagbovie • 323 Exploring American Places with the Discovery Journal: A Guide to Co-Creating Meaningful Interpretation Katie Crawford-Lackey and Barbara Little • 335 Indigenous Cultural Landscapes: A 21st-Century Landscape-scale Conservation and Stewardship Framework Deanna Beacham, Suzanne Copping, John Reynolds, and Carolyn Black • 343 A Framework for Understanding Off-trail Trampling Impacts in Mountain Environments Ross Martin and David R.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Tuolumne River Flow and Temperature Without Dams Model
    DEVELOPMENT OF TUOLUMNE RIVER FLOW AND TEMPERATURE WITHOUT DAMS MODEL Prepared For Turlock Irrigation District Modesto Irrigation District Prepared by Nimal C. Jayasundara Mike L. Deas Ert Sogutlugil Eric Miao Edwin Limanto Andrew Bale Stacy K. Tanaka Watercourse Engineering, Inc. 424 Second Street, Suite B Davis, California 95616 (530) 750 – 3072 March 2014 Revised September 2017 September 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Previous Work .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. Modeling Approach .............................................................................................................................. 5 4. Model Selection and Conceptual Framework Development (Pre-Model Phase) .................................. 6 4.1. Model Selection ............................................................................................................................ 6 4.1.1. RMAGEN ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tuolumne Planning Workbook
    National Park Service Yosemite National Park U.S. Department of the Interior Tuolumne Planning Workbook Report on Progress from Fall 2007 to Present Tuolumne River Plan July 2008 Message from the Superintendent The Purpose of this National Park Service U.S. Dept. of the Interior Dear Friends of the Tuolumne River, and how they might be translated into site plans for Tuolumne Meadows. Planning Workbook Much has happened in the past year, since we asked for your comments in For this workbook the planning team has drafted four prelimi- WHEN THE PLANNING FOR THE TUOLUMNE RIVER BEGAN IN 2005, THE the 2007 Tuolumne Planning Workbook. nary site plan concepts for Tuolumne Meadows —one for each National Park Service knew that it would be a complex, multiyear eff ort. The plan- Yosemite National Park The most recent event was the Ninth of the four original management zoning alternatives. These con- ning team was determined not to let a summer season go by without presenting a Circuit Court of Appeals ruling regard- cepts explore how functions and facilities might be organized detailed update on the plan’s progress to the culturally associated Indian tribes, For more information about the ing the Merced River Plan, which is another comprehensive and sited at Tuolumne Meadows to help carry out the intents of interested members of the public, and other stakeholders—and to provide oppor- Tuolumne River Plan, contact the plan for a wild and scenic river that the park staff is conducting the management zoning alternatives. While the planning team tunities for their input along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
    Sustaining the resources entrusted to our care. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission An Enterprise Department of the City and County of San Francisco, California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 Prepared by SFPUC Financial Services Eric Sandler Assistant General Manager, Business Services & Chief Financial Officer This page has been intentionally left blank. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Section (Unaudited) Page General Manager’s Transmittal Letter....................................................................................................... 1-14 The Reporting Entity................................................................................................................................ 2-4 Long-Term Strategic Goals, Major Accomplishments and Initiatives, and Financial Planning.......... 4-11 Business Continuity and Emergency Planning...................................................................................... 11-12 San Francisco’s Budget Process............................................................................................................ 12 Financial Transparency, Reporting and Auditing Process.................................................................... 12-13 Financial Authority and Policies............................................................................................................. 13
    [Show full text]
  • THE YOSEMITE by John Muir CHAPTER I The
    THE YOSEMITE By John Muir CHAPTER I The Approach to the Valley When I set out on the long excursion that finally led to California I wandered afoot and alone, from Indiana to the Gulf of Mexico, with a plant-press on my back, holding a generally southward course, like the birds when they are going from summer to winter. From the west coast of Florida I crossed the gulf to Cuba, enjoyed the rich tropical flora there for a few months, intending to go thence to the north end of South America, make my way through the woods to the headwaters of the Amazon, and float down that grand river to the ocean. But I was unable to find a ship bound for South America--fortunately perhaps, for I had incredibly little money for so long a trip and had not yet fully recovered from a fever caught in the Florida swamps. Therefore I decided to visit California for a year or two to see its wonderful flora and the famous Yosemite Valley. All the world was before me and every day was a holiday, so it did not seem important to which one of the world's wildernesses I first should wander. Arriving by the Panama steamer, I stopped one day in San Francisco and then inquired for the nearest way out of town. "But where do you want to go?" asked the man to whom I had applied for this important information. "To any place that is wild," I said. This reply startled him. He seemed to fear I might be crazy and therefore the sooner I was out of town the better, so he directed me to the Oakland ferry.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING of the BOARD of DIRECTORS District Board Room, 2890 Mosquito Road, Placerville, California February 25, 2019 — 9:00 A.M
    AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS District Board Room, 2890 Mosquito Road, Placerville, California February 25, 2019 — 9:00 A.M. Board of Directors Alan Day—Division 5 George Osborne—Division 1 President Vice President Pat Dwyer—Division 2 Michael Raffety—Division 3 Lori Anzini—Division 4 Director Director Director Executive Staff Jim Abercrombie Brian D. Poulsen, Jr. Jennifer Sullivan General Manager General Counsel Clerk to the Board Jesse Saich Brian Mueller Mark Price Communications Engineering Finance Jose Perez Tim Ranstrom Dan Corcoran Human Resources Information Technology Operations PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to comment about items not on the Agenda may do so during the public comment period. Those wishing to comment about items on the Agenda may do so when that item is heard and when the Board calls for public comment. Public comments are limited to five minutes per person. PUBLIC RECORDS DISTRIBUTED LESS THAN 72 HOURS BEFORE A MEETING: Any writing that is a public record and is distributed to all or a majority of the Board of Directors less than 72 hours before a meeting shall be available for immediate public inspection in the office of the Clerk to the Board at the address shown above. Public records distributed during the meeting shall be made available at the meeting. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California law, it is the policy of El Dorado Irrigation District to offer its public programs, services, and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuolumne Agencies' Statement on Voluntary Agreements
    February 12, 2020 – Agenda Item #7G BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY AND CONSERVATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING February 7, 2020 Correspondence and media coverage of interest between January 27, 2020 and February 6, 2020 Correspondence To: Press Release From: TID, MID, and SFPUC Date: February 5, 2020 Subject: Tuolumne agencies’ statement on voluntary agreements Media Coverage Water Supply Conditions: Date: February 7, 2020 Source: FoxNews.com Article: What does atmospheric river mean? How the “Pineapple Express impacts the West Coast Date: February 3, 2020 Source: KJZZ 91.5 FM Article: Some Droughts Are “Perfect.” Here’s Why Date: February 3, 2020 Source: Mountain Democrat Article: Sierra snowpack dwindling after dry January Water Policy: Date: February 6, 2020 Source: Daily Journal Article: Bay funding gets House approval Date: February 6, 2020 Source: San Francisco Chronicle Article: Top EPA official in California says firing water “100% personal” Date: February 5, 2020 Source: Fish Sniffer Article: Voluntary Settlement Are Disastrous for Fish and the Ecosystem – and Are Not New Date: February 5, 2020 Source: Los Angeles Times Article: Newsom administration trying again for a river flow deal Date: February 5, 2020 Source: Maven’s Notebook Article: Metropolitan Bay Delta Committee: Delta Conveyance Update, Plus a Brief Update on the Voluntary Agreements February 12, 2020 – Agenda Item #7G Water Policy, cont’d.: Date: February 5, 2020 Source: Sacramento Bee Article: Newsom seeks peace with Trump in California water wars. Enviros are ready to fight Date: February 4, 2020 Source: Cal Matters Article: Gov. Newsom: California must get past differences on water. Voluntary agreements are the path forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Forest Dynamics Plot
    REFERENCE COPY - USE for xeroxing historic resource siuay VOLUME 3 OF 3 discussion of historical resources, appendixes, historical base maps, bibliography YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK / CALIFORNIA Historic Resource Study YOSEMITE: THE PARK AND ITS RESOURCES A History of the Discovery, Management, and Physical Development of Yosemite National Park, California Volume 3 of 3 Discussion of Historical Resources, Appendixes, Historical Base Maps, Bibliography by Linda Wedel Greene September 1987 U.S. Department of the Interior / National Park Service b) Frederick Olmsted's Treatise on Parks ... 55 c) Significance of the Yosemite Grant .... 59 B. State Management of the Yosemite Grant .... 65 1. Land Surveys ......... 65 2. Immediate Problems Facing the State .... 66 3. Settlers' Claims ........ 69 4. Trails ........%.. 77 a) Early Survey Work ....... 77 b) Routes To and Around Yosemite Valley ... 78 c) Tourist Trails in the Valley ..... 79 (1) Four-Mile Trail to Glacier Point ... 80 (2) Indian Canyon Trail ..... 82 (3) Yosemite Fall and Eagle Peak Trail ... 83 (4) Rim Trail, Pohono Trail ..... 83 (5) Clouds Rest and Half (South) Dome Trails . 84 (6) Vernal Fall and Mist Trails .... 85 (7) Snow Trail ....... 87 (8) Anderson Trail ....... (9) Panorama Trail ....... (10) Ledge Trail 89 5. Improvement of Trails ....... 89 a) Hardships Attending Travel to Yosemite Valley . 89 b) Yosemite Commissioners Encourage Road Construction 91 c) Work Begins on the Big Oak Flat and Coulterville Roads ......... 92 d) Improved Roads and Railroad Service Increase Visitation ......... 94 e) The Coulterville Road Reaches the Valley Floor . 95 1) A New Transportation Era Begins ... 95 2) Later History 99 f) The Big Oak Flat Road Reaches the Valley Floor .
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Analysis of Tuolumne Meadows Yosemite National Park 2007
    Scenic Analysis of Tuolumne Meadows Yosemite National Park 2007 Prepared by: Steven Torgerson and Daniel Schaible with GIS technical support from: Bill Kuhn Table of Contents Introduction Part 1 Context.................................................................................................................................3 Landscape Character Part 2 Landform Patterns................................................................................................................5 Watershed Characteristics....................................................................................................6 Vegetation Patterns ..............................................................................................................6 Cultural Features..................................................................................................................7 Visibility Zones Part 3 Non-visibility Zones..........................................................................................................10 Low Visibility Zones .........................................................................................................10 Moderate Visibility Zones .................................................................................................11 High Visibility Zones.........................................................................................................11 View and Vista Points Part 4 Linear View Corridors .......................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite: Warming Takes a Toll
    Bay Area Style Tuolumne County Gives Celebrating Wealthy renowned A guide to donors’ S.F. retailer autumn’s legacies Wilkes best live on Bashford’s hiking, through Island Style ever-so- climbing their good Unforgettable Hawaiian adventures. K1 stylish and works. N1 career. J1 biking. M1 SFChronicle.com | Sunday, October 18,2015 | Printed on recycled paper | $3.00 xxxxx• Airbnb measure divides neighbors Prop. F’s backers, opponents split come in the middle of the night, CAMPAIGN 2015 source of his income in addition bumping their luggage down to work as a real estate agent over impact on tight housing market the alley. This is not an occa- and renewable-energy consul- sional use when a kid goes to ing and liability issues. tant, Li said. college or someone is away for a But Li, 38, said he urges “I depend on Airbnb to make By Carolyn Said Phil Li, who rents out three week. Along with all the house guests to be respectful, while sure I can meet each month’s suites to travelers via Airbnb. cleaners, it’s an array of com- two other neighbors said that expenses,” he said. “I screen A narrow alley separates “He’s running a hotel next mercial traffic in a residential they are not affected. Vacation guests carefully and educate Libby Noronha’sWest Portal door,” said Noronha, 67,a re- neighborhood,” she said of the rentals helped him after he lost them to come and go quietly.” house from that of her neighbor tired federal employee. “People noise, smoking, garbage, park- his job and remain a major Prop.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite National Park National Park Service
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Yosemite National Park Tuolumne Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement Tuolumne River Values and Baseline Conditions After five years of study and stakeholder involvement, the Tuolumne Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Tuolumne River Plan/DEIS) will be released in summer of 2011. In advance of the plan’s release, the NPS is providing the Tuolumne River Values and Baseline Conditions chapter as a preview into one of the plan’s most foundational elements. Sharing the baseline information in advance of the plan will give members of the public an understanding of river conditions today and specific issues that will be explored in the Tuolumne River Plan. Public comments on all elements of the Tuolumne River Plan, including the baseline conditions chapter, will be accepted when it is released for review this summer. What follows is a description of the unique values that make the Tuolumne stand apart from all other rivers in the nation. This chapter also provides a snapshot in time, documenting overall conditions and implications for future management. In particular the baseline chapter examines, • What are the outstandingly remarkable values that make the Tuolumne River worthy of special protection under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA)? • What do we know about the condition of these values (in addition to water quality and free-flow), both at time of designation in 1984 and
    [Show full text]
  • 656955000 Public Utilities Commission of the City And
    NEW ISSUE - Book-Entry Only Ratings: S&P:"AA-" Moody's: "Aa2" (See "RATINGS.") In the opinion of Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel to the SFPUC ("Bond Counsel''), interest on the 2019 Series ABC Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes imposed by the State of California. Interest on the 2019 Series ABC Bonds is includable in the gross income of the owners of the 2019 Series ABC Bonds for federal income tax purposes. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2019 Series ABC Bonds. See "TAX MATTERS" herein. $656,955,000 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco Water Revenue Bonds, 2019 Series ABC $622,580,000 $16,450,000 $17,925,000 2019 Sub-Series A Bonds 2019 Sub-Series B Bonds 2019 Sub-Series C Bonds (Refunding - Federally Taxable) (WSIP) (Refunding - Federally Taxable) (Refunding - Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (Hetch Hetchy) (Local Water Main) Climate Bond Certifi<>d Dated: Date of Delivery Due: November 1, as shown on inside front cover General. This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not intended to be a summary of the security or terms of the water revenue bonds captioned above. Potential investors are instructed to read the entire Official Statement, including the appendices hereto, to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision. Authority for Issuance. The Public Utilities
    [Show full text]