DOCSLIB.ORG

Factors Affecting the Size and Distribution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Factors Affecting the Size and Distribution FACTORS AFFECTING THE SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION OF LARGE HERBIVORES IN KAFUE NATIONAL PARK, ZAMBIA by Wigganson Matandiko A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Fish and Wildlife Biology MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana May 2016 ©COPYRIGHT by Wigganson Matandiko 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to thank my graduate committee, Professor Scott Creel (Chair), Dr. Steve Cherry (Mathematics & Statistics), Dr. Matthew Becker, (CEO – Zambia Canivore Program), Dr. Dave A. Christianson (University of Arizona) for their constructive criticism that has led to the work and results described in this dissertation. I especially thank Professor Creel for his patient guidance. I thank Dr. Matthew Becker and Rachel McRobb who planted the idea of attending graduate School in the United States of America. Dr. Becker worked his way to present a strong case for Fulbright scholarship application. I thank University of Zambia, Schools of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture Sciences for opening doors to their laboratory facilities. I thank Dr. Paul Schuette who is the backbone of the study design in my research. I thank my colleagues, Elias Rosenblatt, Egil Droge, Jassiel M’soka for their available help. I also wish to thank David McGuire for his assistance in the Creel laboratory. I thank Drs. Mwamba Sichande, Kambwiri Banda, Innocent N’gombwa and Jackson Katampi for participating in my research activities. I want to thank the church family at the Bozeman Adventist Church under the able leadership of Pastor Jim Jenkins and my host family of Mr. and Mrs. Kelly Coffin who took me in as one of their own. The following also helped in data collection and / or organization: Evans Nsende, Rachel Sullivan, Annie Sikanwe, Hannah Rasker, Carolyn Sanguinetti, Brandon Nickerson, Pearson Musonda, Angelina Kelly, Paige Mascol, Aubrey Labarre, Brianna Willey, Samantha Smith, Katelyn Belleville, Wigganson (Jr) Matandiko, Kelvin Yande, Albert Mwangana, Eric Przybyszewski, Teddy Mukula, and others not mentioned. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FACTORS AFFECTING THE SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION OF LARGE HERBIVORE HERDS IN KAFUE NATIONAL PARK, ZAMBIA: ORGANIZATION OF THE RESEARCH AND THESIS. .......................... 1 2. FACTORS AFFECTING LARGE HERBIVORE DISTRIBUTION AND DENSITY IN KAFUE NATIONAL PARK, ZAMBIA ....................................... 5 2.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 5 A. Abiotic ............................................................................................................. 7 B. Biotic ............................................................................................................... 8 C. Anthropogenic Effects..................................................................................... 9 2.2. Materials and Methods ............................................................................................. 9 2.2.1. Study Area ................................................................................................. 9 2.2.2. Study Design ............................................................................................ 11 2.2.2.1. Sampling Design ........................................................................... 11 2.2.3 Covariate Measurement ............................................................................ 13 2.2.3.1 Abiotic Factors ............................................................................... 13 2.2.3.1. a. Soil Chemistry and Texture .............................................. 13 2.2.3.1.b. Water Availability ............................................................. 14 2.2.3.2 Bottom-Up Processes ..................................................................... 15 2.2.3.2.a. Vegetation Communities and Edge Density ...................... 15 2.2.3.2.b. Vegetation Characteristics ................................................. 15 2.2.3.2.c. Anthropogenic Effects ....................................................... 15 2.2.3.3. Top-down Processes: Predation Risk ............................................ 16 2.2.4. Animal Counts ......................................................................................... 17 2.3. Distance Sampling Analysis .................................................................................. 18 2.3.1. Model Set and Model Selection ............................................................... 18 2.3.2. Analysis of the Complete Model Set for Two Years’ Data and a Partial Model Set for Three Years’ Data ........................................................... 21 2.4. Results .................................................................................................................... 21 2.4.1. Sample Size .............................................................................................. 21 2.4.2. Impala ...................................................................................................... 27 2.4.3. Puku ......................................................................................................... 28 2.4.4. Warthog.................................................................................................... 30 2.5. Discussion .............................................................................................................. 32 2.5.1. Impala ...................................................................................................... 33 2.5.2. Puku ......................................................................................................... 36 2.5.3. Warthog.................................................................................................... 38 2.6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 42 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS-CONTINUED 3. TOP-DOWN, BOTTOM-UP AND ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECTS ON LARGE HERBIVORE GROUP SIZES IN KAFUE NATIONAL PARK, ZAMBIA .................................................................................... 44 3.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 44 3.2. Methods.................................................................................................................. 47 3.2.1. Study Area................................................................................................. 47 3.2.2. Sampling Design and Observations of Group Size ............................................................................... 48 3.2.3. Bottom-up Limiting Factors .................................................................... 51 3.2.4. Anthropogenic Limiting Factors .............................................................. 53 3.2.5. Top-down Limiting Factors: Predation Risk from Lions ................................................................... 53 3.3. Statistical Methods ................................................................................................. 54 3.4. Results .................................................................................................................... 56 3.4.1. Impala ...................................................................................................... 56 3.4.2. Puku ......................................................................................................... 59 3.4.3. Warthog.................................................................................................... 61 3.5. Discussion .............................................................................................................. 64 4. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC VARIABLES AFFECTING DISTRIBUTION AND SIZE OF LARGE HERBIVORES IN KAFUE NATIONAL PARK, ZAMBIA. ................................................................................... 67 4.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 67 4.2. Comparison of Effects on Herd Distribution and Herd Sizes ................................................................................. 69 4.4. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 77 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 78 APPENDIX A: Dedication ................................................................................................90 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1. Number of observations and range of group sizes for herbivore species analyzed using distance sampling. ....................................................... 22 2.2 (a) and (b). Distance sampling models with results from model selection using Akaike’s information criteria ................................................... 23 2.3 (a) and (b). Coefficient estimates of impala, puku and warthog herd density from highest ranking models. ....................................................... 25 3.1. Effects on impala herd size from stepwise positive Poisson GLM. ................. 58 3.2 Effects on puku herd size from stepwise positive Poisson GLM. ..................... 60 3.3. Effects on warthog group size from stepwise positive Poisson GLM. ............. 62 4.1. Summary of effects on the density of distribution of herds (HD) and herd size (HS) for impala, puku
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effective Population Size and Genetic Conservation Criteria for Bull Trout
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:756±764, 2001 q Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2001 Effective Population Size and Genetic Conservation Criteria for Bull Trout B. E. RIEMAN* U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 316 East Myrtle, Boise, Idaho 83702, USA F. W. A LLENDORF Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA Abstract.ÐEffective population size (Ne) is an important concept in the management of threatened species like bull trout Salvelinus con¯uentus. General guidelines suggest that effective population sizes of 50 or 500 are essential to minimize inbreeding effects or maintain adaptive genetic variation, respectively. Although Ne strongly depends on census population size, it also depends on demographic and life history characteristics that complicate any estimates. This is an especially dif®cult problem for species like bull trout, which have overlapping generations; biologists may monitor annual population number but lack more detailed information on demographic population structure or life history. We used a generalized, age-structured simulation model to relate Ne to adult numbers under a range of life histories and other conditions characteristic of bull trout populations. Effective population size varied strongly with the effects of the demographic and environmental variation included in our simulations. Our most realistic estimates of Ne were between about 0.5 and 1.0 times the mean number of adults spawning annually. We conclude that cautious long-term management goals for bull trout populations should include an average of at least 1,000 adults spawning each year. Where local populations are too small, managers should seek to conserve a collection of interconnected populations that is at least large enough in total to meet this minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Routledge Handbook of Ecological and Environmental Restoration the Principles of Restoration Ecology at Population Scales
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 26 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK Routledge Handbook of Ecological and Environmental Restoration Stuart K. Allison, Stephen D. Murphy The Principles of Restoration Ecology at Population Scales Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315685977.ch3 Stephen D. Murphy, Michael J. McTavish, Heather A. Cray Published online on: 23 May 2017 How to cite :- Stephen D. Murphy, Michael J. McTavish, Heather A. Cray. 23 May 2017, The Principles of Restoration Ecology at Population Scales from: Routledge Handbook of Ecological and Environmental Restoration Routledge Accessed on: 26 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315685977.ch3 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 THE PRINCIPLES OF RESTORATION ECOLOGY AT POPULATION SCALES Stephen D.
    [Show full text]
  • Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout Has in THIS ISSUE Dbeen Awarded the President’S Cup Letter from the President
    DSC NEWSLETTER VOLUME 32,Camp ISSUE 5 TalkJUNE 2019 Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout has IN THIS ISSUE Dbeen awarded the President’s Cup Letter from the President .....................1 for her pending world record East African DSC Foundation .....................................2 Defassa Waterbuck. Awards Night Results ...........................4 DSC’s April Monthly Meeting brings Industry News ........................................8 members together to celebrate the annual Chapter News .........................................9 Trophy and Photo Award presentation. Capstick Award ....................................10 This year, there were over 150 entries for Dove Hunt ..............................................12 the Trophy Awards, spanning 22 countries Obituary ..................................................14 and almost 100 different species. Membership Drive ...............................14 As photos of all the entries played Kid Fish ....................................................16 during cocktail hour, the room was Wine Pairing Dinner ............................16 abuzz with stories of all the incredible Traveler’s Advisory ..............................17 adventures experienced – ibex in Spain, Hotel Block for Heritage ....................19 scenic helicopter rides over the Northwest Big Bore Shoot .....................................20 Territories, puku in Zambia. CIC International Conference ..........22 In determining the winners, the judges DSC Publications Update
    [Show full text]
  • Communities of Small Mammals in Kafue National Park and Their Response to Fire, Vegetation and Land Use
    Communities of small mammals in Kafue National Park and their response to fire, vegetation and land use DISSERTATION submitted for the degree of Doctor of Science (Dr. rer. nat.) Department of Animal Ecology and Conservation University of Hamburg Photo taken by: Neeta Simunji submitted by Ngawo Namukonde Hamburg, 2017 i Revised version Dissertation reviewers: Prof. Dr. Jörg U Ganzhorn Prof. Dr. Japhet K Mbata Date of oral defense: 24th November, 2017 ii Summary Small mammals assume multiple and cardinal roles in ecosystem functionality. They are known to influence the composition and structure of plant communities through their herbivorous and seed predation activities, as agents of soil aeration through their burrowing activities, pest controllers as the consume large amounts of insects and plant material, and as food for a variety of prey. Yet, the understanding of small mammal ecology is overshadowed by studies of large mammals as small mammals have very little tourism appeal and are often viewed as vermin benefiting from human disturbances. Even so, many small mammals are known to be highly sensitive to anthropogenic factors. This lack of information on small mammals also applies to the Kafue National Park (KNP), Zambia, including the Busanga Flood Plain as one of KNP’s critical habitats and a wetland of international importance (RAMSAR site number 1659). Not much is known about small mammals in the KNP, much less the influence of anthropogenic and non-antropogenic factors on their communities. Given that KNP is a protected area where the human foot print is minimized, anthropogenic factors that act upon the communities of small mammals include bush fires, that occur repeatedly (annually) on wildlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Restoration Ecology
    ch06 2/9/06 12:45 PM Page 113 189686 / Island Press / Falk Chapter 6 Evolutionary Restoration Ecology Craig A. Stockwell, Michael T. Kinnison, and Andrew P. Hendry Restoration Ecology and Evolutionary Process Restoration activities have increased dramatically in recent years, creating evolutionary chal- lenges and opportunities. Though restoration has favored a strong focus on the role of habi- tat, concerns surrounding the evolutionary ecology of populations are increasing. In this con- text, previous researchers have considered the importance of preserving extant diversity and maintaining future evolutionary potential (Montalvo et al. 1997; Lesica and Allendorf 1999), but they have usually ignored the prospect of ongoing evolution in real time. However, such contemporary evolution (changes occurring over one to a few hundred generations) appears to be relatively common in nature (Stockwell and Weeks 1999; Bone and Farres 2001; Kin- nison and Hendry 2001; Reznick and Ghalambor 2001; Ashley et al. 2003; Stockwell et al. 2003). Moreover, it is often associated with situations that may prevail in restoration projects, namely the presence of introduced populations and other anthropogenic disturbances (Stockwell and Weeks 1999; Bone and Farres 2001; Reznick and Ghalambor 2001) (Table 6.1). Any restoration program may thus entail consideration of evolution in the past, present, and future. Restoration efforts often involve dramatic and rapid shifts in habitat that may even lead to different ecological states (such as altered fire regimes) (Suding et al. 2003). Genetic variants that evolved within historically different evolutionary contexts (the past) may thus be pitted against novel and mismatched current conditions (the present). The degree of this mismatch should then determine the pattern and strength of selection acting on trait variation in such populations (Box 6.1; Figure 6.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate Kafue
    Ultimate Kafue Being an area roughly the size of Wales, the variety of landscapes, animal and bird life of the Kafue National Park are unmatched. The Ultimate Kafue safari allows you to visit the park in depth, travelling from the northern Busanga Plains, to southern Nanzhila Plains and all the wilderness in between. You will experience real remoteness, breath-taking river landscapes and encounter wildlife undisturbed. This 15 day / 14 night safari accommodates you in five selected safari camps and includes a ‘five nights for four’ stay at KaingU with a selection of special activities, an optional island sleepout or just time to relax. Travel Dates: 01st July to 31st October 2019 ZAMBIAZAMBIA KAFUE N.P. ZIMBABWE NAMIBIA BOTSWANA Ultimate Kafue Brief Safari Overview: Start your ultimate visit to the Kafue National Park from Lusaka or Livingstone. A charter flight connects from/to Lusaka and the transfer to/from Livingstone is done by road. (Private charter flights to/from Livingstone are available too, please enquire.) This ultimate trip through the Kafue National Park will take you to the famous Busanga Plains in the north, through Miombo woodlands and dambos, following the varied Kafue river system to Lake Itezhi Tezhi and to the Nanzhila Plains in the south. As the crow flies, you will travel a distance of over 240km from north to south in one park. As the land varies, so do its inhabitants. You will encounter large herds of lechwe, wildebeest, roan and numerous sightings of the rare wattled cranes in the Busanga Plains. The Miombo woodlands and dambos provide home to a greater variety of mammal and bird species.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Biology & Life Tables
    EXERCISE 3 Population Biology: Life Tables & Theoretical Populations The purpose of this lab is to introduce the basic principles of population biology and to allow you to manipulate and explore a few of the most common equations using some simple Mathcad© wooksheets. A good introduction of this subject can be found in a general biology text book such as Campbell (1996), while a more complete discussion of pop- ulation biology can be found in an ecology text (e.g., Begon et al. 1990) or in one of the references listed at the end of this exercise. Exercise Objectives: After you have completed this lab, you should be able to: 1. Give deÞnitions of the terms in bold type. 2. Estimate population size from capture-recapture data. 3. Compare the following sets of terms: semelparous vs. iteroparous life cycles, cohort vs. static life tables, Type I vs. II vs. III survivorship curves, density dependent vs. density independent population growth, discrete vs. continuous breeding seasons, divergent vs. dampening oscillation cycles, and time lag vs. generation time in population models. 4. Calculate lx, dx, qx, R0, Tc, and ex; and estimate r from life table data. 5. Choose the appropriate theoretical model for predicting growth of a given population. 6. Calculate population size at a particular time (Nt+1) when given its size one time unit previous (Nt) and the corre- sponding variables (e.g., r, K, T, and/or L) of the appropriate model. 7. Understand how r, K, T, and L affect population growth. Population Size A population is a localized group of individuals of the same species.
    [Show full text]
  • Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography: a Review
    Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography: A Review Angela D. Yu Simon A. Lei Abstract—The topography, climatic pattern, location, and origin of relationship, dispersal mechanisms and their response to islands generate unique patterns of species distribution. The equi- isolation, and species turnover. Additionally, conservation librium theory of island biogeography creates a general framework of oceanic and continental (habitat) islands is examined in in which the study of taxon distribution and broad island trends relation to minimum viable populations and areas, may be conducted. Critical components of the equilibrium theory metapopulation dynamics, and continental reserve design. include the species-area relationship, island-mainland relation- Finally, adverse anthropogenic impacts on island ecosys- ship, dispersal mechanisms, and species turnover. Because of the tems are investigated, including overexploitation of re- theoretical similarities between islands and fragmented mainland sources, habitat destruction, and introduction of exotic spe- landscapes, reserve conservation efforts have attempted to apply cies and diseases (biological invasions). Throughout this the theory of island biogeography to improve continental reserve article, theories of many researchers are re-introduced and designs, and to provide insight into metapopulation dynamics and utilized in an analytical manner. The objective of this article the SLOSS debate. However, due to extensive negative anthropo- is to review previously published data, and to reveal if any genic activities, overexploitation of resources, habitat destruction, classical and emergent theories may be brought into the as well as introduction of exotic species and associated foreign study of island biogeography and its relevance to mainland diseases (biological invasions), island conservation has recently ecosystem patterns. become a pressing issue itself.
    [Show full text]
  • COULD R SELECTION ACCOUNT for the AFRICAN PERSONALITY and LIFE CYCLE?
    Person. individ.Diff. Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 665-675, 1993 0191-8869/93 S6.OOf0.00 Printedin Great Britain.All rightsreserved Copyright0 1993Pergamon Press Ltd COULD r SELECTION ACCOUNT FOR THE AFRICAN PERSONALITY AND LIFE CYCLE? EDWARD M. MILLER Department of Economics and Finance, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, U.S.A. (Received I7 November 1992; received for publication 27 April 1993) Summary-Rushton has shown that Negroids exhibit many characteristics that biologists argue result from r selection. However, the area of their origin, the African Savanna, while a highly variable environment, would not select for r characteristics. Savanna humans have not adopted the dispersal and colonization strategy to which r characteristics are suited. While r characteristics may be selected for when adult mortality is highly variable, biologists argue that where juvenile mortality is variable, K character- istics are selected for. Human variable birth rates are mathematically similar to variable juvenile birth rates. Food shortage caused by African drought induce competition, just as food shortages caused by high population. Both should select for K characteristics, which by definition contribute to success at competition. Occasional long term droughts are likely to select for long lives, late menopause, high paternal investment, high anxiety, and intelligence. These appear to be the opposite to Rushton’s r characteristics, and opposite to the traits he attributes to Negroids. Rushton (1985, 1987, 1988) has argued that Negroids (i.e. Negroes) were r selected. This idea has produced considerable scientific (Flynn, 1989; Leslie, 1990; Lynn, 1989; Roberts & Gabor, 1990; Silverman, 1990) and popular controversy (Gross, 1990; Pearson, 1991, Chapter 5), which Rushton (1989a, 1990, 1991) has responded to.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scoping Review of Viral Diseases in African Ungulates
    veterinary sciences Review A Scoping Review of Viral Diseases in African Ungulates Hendrik Swanepoel 1,2, Jan Crafford 1 and Melvyn Quan 1,* 1 Vectors and Vector-Borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Disease, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0110, South Africa; [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (J.C.) 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +27-12-529-8142 Abstract: (1) Background: Viral diseases are important as they can cause significant clinical disease in both wild and domestic animals, as well as in humans. They also make up a large proportion of emerging infectious diseases. (2) Methods: A scoping review of peer-reviewed publications was performed and based on the guidelines set out in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. (3) Results: The final set of publications consisted of 145 publications. Thirty-two viruses were identified in the publications and 50 African ungulates were reported/diagnosed with viral infections. Eighteen countries had viruses diagnosed in wild ungulates reported in the literature. (4) Conclusions: A comprehensive review identified several areas where little information was available and recommendations were made. It is recommended that governments and research institutions offer more funding to investigate and report viral diseases of greater clinical and zoonotic significance. A further recommendation is for appropriate One Health approaches to be adopted for investigating, controlling, managing and preventing diseases. Diseases which may threaten the conservation of certain wildlife species also require focused attention.
    [Show full text]
  • ZAMBIA and Victoria Falls
    and Victoria Falls ZAMBIA in Zimbabwe > Explore the largest waterfalls in the world! > Safari by boat and canoe on the mighty Zambezi River! > Track wildlife on foot during spectacular walking safaris. 3 4 2 1 >>> Explore the most amazing corners of Zambia in 5 stops on this Fly-in Safari. This fantastic fly in safari combines 3 extraordinary destinations in one trip. 1. Your first stop is the breath-taking Victoria Falls – whether you’re an adventurer or not there’s plenty here to get your trip off to a flying start! 2. Then it’s over to the Lower Zambezi where you’ll mix your game drives with boat safaris and canoe trips, and perhaps a big of fishing too. 3. Lastly, you’ll head to the South Luangwa, home of the walking safari, for some serious wildlife-watching both on foot and on traditional game drives! 4. OPTIONAL extra stop - Glide in a Hot Air Balloon over the amazing Kafue National Park 5. The trip ends with a night in bustling Lusaka to reflect on this adventure and comfortably connect to the flight home the next day. Day 1 & 2 | Victoria Falls! Brand new Victoria Falls Airport Arrival at Victoria Falls International Airport in Zimbabwe Most international flight to the area land in VicFalls, Zimbabwe. Just 10km away from the boarder of Zambia. Both the town Victoria Falls and Livingstone offer great < 1708m wide > “theVictoria largest waterfalls in the world!“Falls, accommodation options to explore the World’s Largest Waterfalls! About The Victoria Falls (Zimbabwe & Zambia) Victoria Falls is one of the world’s most impressive waterfalls.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics of Population Dynamics Greg Yarrow, Professor of Wildlife Ecology, Extension Wildlife Specialist
    The Basics of Population Dynamics Greg Yarrow, Professor of Wildlife Ecology, Extension Wildlife Specialist Fact Sheet 29 Forestry and Natural Resources Revised May 2009 All forms of wildlife, regardless of the species, will respond to changes in density dependence. These concepts are important for landowners habitat, hunting or trapping, and weather conditions with fluctuations and natural resource managers to understand when making decisions in animal numbers. Most landowners have probably experienced affecting wildlife on private land. changes in wildlife abundance from year to year without really knowing why there are fewer individuals in some years than others. How Many Offspring Can Wildlife Have? In many cases, changes in abundance are normal and to be expected. Most people realize that some wildlife species can produce more The purpose of the information presented here is to help landowners offspring than others. Bobwhite quail are genetically programmed to lay understand why animal numbers may vary or change. While a number an average of 14 eggs per clutch. Each species has a maximum genetic of important concepts will be discussed, one underlying theme should reproductive potential or biotic potential. always be remembered. Regardless of whether property is managed or not in any given year, there is always some change in the habitat, Biotic potential describes a population’s ability to grow over time however small. Wildlife must adjust to this change and, therefore, no through reproduction. Most bat species are likely to produce one population is ever the same from one year to the next. offspring per year. In contrast, a female cottontail rabbit will have a litter size of approximately 5.
    [Show full text]