DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet NPSForm10-900-a (Rev. 01/2009) 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Northwestern Bell Telephone Company Regional Headquarters Douglas Co., Nebraska SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 09000526 Property Name: Northwestern Bell Telephone Company Regional Headquarters County: Douglas State: Nebraska Multiple Name: N/A This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. ''^/yn^C S?^^&^M^tL^£>J July 17, 2009_____________ ignature of the Keeper / Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination: Section 10: Geographical Data The page numbers referenced under the Verbal Boundary Description and the Boundary Justification are, hereby, corrected to read "Page 10.14." The Nebraska State Historic Preservation Office was notified of this amendment. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) 301AH33 MfciVcJ "1VNQUVN SdOVld OiHOiSiH JO U3iSi33a 1VN United States Department of the Interior ^ National Park Service } L ~^fJ eo Nnr National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in / sw^ts Cdmpfei&iha ^srtonaMegisterof-HhstorKflsfixgR >gistration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information E^sTStrr-rFarrflteTilTKres^crapptyW^ documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable". For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1 . Name of Property Historic name Northwestern Bell Telephone Company Regional Headquarters Other names/site number 0009:0124-056 2. Location Street & number 100 South 19th Street Not for publication [] City or town Omaha__________ Vicinity [] State Nebraska Code NE County Douglas Code 055 Zip code 68102 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this [x] nomination [] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [x] meets [] does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant [] nationally [] statewide ^locally. ([] See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ' 2<jof Signature of certifying offidal Date/> Director, Nebraska State Historical Society State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property [] meets [] does not meet the National Register criteria. ([] See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I, hereby, certify that this property is: ».] entered in the National Register. •i-/,-^,Z/<-#&/•< [ ] see continuation sheet. [ ] determined eligible for the National Register. [ ] see continuation sheet. [ ] determined not eligible for the National Register. [ ] removed from the National Register. [ ] other, (explain): _________________ Signature of Keeper Date of Action Northwestern Bell Telephone Company Regional Headquarters Douglas, Nebraska Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) x Private x Building(s) Contributing Noncontributing __ Public-local ___ District ____1_____ ___________ Buildings __ Public-state Site ________ _________ Sites Public-federal Structure ________ _________ Structures Object ________ _________ Objects 1 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) listed in the National Register N/A 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) (Enter categories from instructions.) COMMERCE/TRADE: Business DOMESTIC: Multiple Dwelling WORK IN PROGRESS 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions.) (Enter categories from instructions.) OTHER: Modern Foundation CONCRETE Walls BRICK Roof SYNTHETICS/Rubber Other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Northwestern Bell Telephone Company Regional Headquarters Douglas, Nebraska Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "X" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions.) for National Register listing.) COMMUNICATIONS x A Property is associated with events that have COMMERCE made a significant contribution to the broad ARCHITECTURE patterns of our history. _ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. x C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents Period of Significance a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. 1957-1964 _ D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. Significant Dates Criteria Considerations (Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.) 1957 1964 Property is: _ A Owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person _ B Removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above.) _ C A birthplace or a grave. _ D A cemetery. Cultural Affiliation __ E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. __ F A commemorative property. __ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Architect/Builder Leo A. Paly___ Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location for additional data: _ Preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested State Historic Preservation Office _ Previously listed in the National Register Other State agency _ Previously determined eligible by the National Register Federal agency _ Designated a National Historic Landmark Local Government _ Recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # University _ Recorded by Historic American Engineering Other Omaha Public Library, UNL Record #______, Name of repository: Architecture Library____ Northwestern Bell Telephone Company Regional Headquarters Douglas, Nebraska Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of property Less than one acre UTM References (place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet). Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1. 15 253577 4571510 3. 2. 4. [ ] See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) See Map Entitled "Key Plan," Section 10, Page 16. Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) See Map Entitled "Key Plan," Section 10, Page 16. 11. Form Prepared By name/title Christina A. Jansen organization Alley Poyner Macchietto Architecture date May 21, 2009 street & number 1516Cuming Street telephone 402-341-1544 city or town Omaha_________ state NE zip code 68102 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items.) Property Owner (Complete this item at the request of the SHPO or FPO.) name/title Vern Dolleck street & number 10730 Pacific Street, Suite 242 telephone 402-391-7030 city or town Omaha_______________ state NE zip code 68114 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determined eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, (15 USC 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Qwest Corporation TARIFF FCC NO. 2[1]
    Qwest Corporation TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 2[1] SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION ORIGINAL TITLE PAGE REGULATIONS, RATES AND CHARGES Applying to the Special Construction of Facilities in connection with the provision of Interstate Services within the operating territory of Qwest Corporation in the State(s) of Arizona (AZ) Colorado (CO) Idaho (ID) Iowa (IA) Minnesota (MN) Montana (MT) Nebraska (NE) New Mexico (NM) North Dakota (ND) Oregon (OR) South Dakota (SD) Utah (UT) Washington (WA) Wyoming (WY) as provided herein d/b/a Qwest Original Tariff effective July 26, 2000. [1] This entire Tariff is issued under the authority of Special Permission No. 00-064. (Filed under Transmittal No. 1.) Issued: July 25, 2000 Effective: July 26, 2000 By: Director - Federal Regulatory Suite 5100 1801 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Qwest Corporation TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 2 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 105TH REVISED PAGE 0-1 CANCELS 104TH REVISED PAGE 0-1 CHECK SHEET Title Page and Pages 0-1 to 0-7; 1-1; 2-1 to 2-14; 3-1 to 3-11; 4-1; 5-1 to 5-22; 6-1 to 6- 110 inclusive of this Tariff are effective as of July 26, 2000. NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF REVISION REVISION REVISION EXCEPT AS EXCEPT AS EXCEPT AS PAGE INDICATED PAGE INDICATED PAGE INDICATED Title Original 3-2 Original 5-21 Original 0-1 105th * 3-3 Original 5-22 Original 0-1.1 84th * 3-4 Original 6-1 Original 0-1.2 60th * 3-5 Original 6-2 Original 0-1.3 31st * 3-6 Original 6-3 Original 0-1.4 12th * 3-7 Original 6-4 Original 0-1.5 7th * 3-8 Original 6-5 Original 0-1.6 3rd * 3-9 Original 6-6 Original 0-2 Original 3-10 Original
    [Show full text]
  • Curtis L. Kennedy Attorney at Law
    CURTIS L. KENNEDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 8405 E. PRINCETON AVE. DENVER, CO 80237-1741 [email protected] TELEPHONE (303) 770-0440 ALSO ADMITTED IN: ___________________ UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT STATE OF ARIZONA FAX (303) 843-0360 STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF TEXAS WASHINGTON, D.C. August 20, 2004 List of Retiree Telephone Concession Reimbursement Documents: 1 Date (Approximate): Originator Title and Description: Revised 12-1-61 Mountain States Telephone & Interdepartmental Manual No. 122 –Telephone Service Furnished to Revised 7-1-63 Telegraph Company Active and Pensioned Employees for Personal Use (21 pages) January 1974 Benefits Department - Telephone Service After Retirement. “Effective with your Mountain Bell retirement. charges for your residence telephone service will be paid by this Company. during your lifetime. After retirement, if you take up residence in an area not served by Mountain Bell, this concession still applies. .” (1 page) 1 Note: Documents indicated with * are supplemental either in whole or in part to those appearing on the July 19, 2004, index. -1- September 1976 Corporate Personnel - Benefits Pensioners’ Concession Telephone Service. “When your pension is Mountain Bell effective, charges for your residence telephone service will be paid by this Company. This means that, except for a few special types of service, you will receive free local service and be allowed a reasonable but limited amount of toll service over Bell System or connecting company lines within the continental United States during your lifetime. .also applies if your telephone service is provided by a company other than Mountain Bell. .If you take up residence in an area not served by Mountain Bell, this concession still applies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book
    The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund
    Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund May 31, 2021 STI-QTLY-0721 1.816022.116 Schedule of Investments May 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks – 99.3% Shares Value Shares Value COMMUNICATION SERVICES – 10.1% World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Class A (b) 76,178 $ 4,253,780 Diversified Telecommunication Services – 1.1% Zynga, Inc. (a) 1,573,367 17,055,298 Alaska Communication Systems Group, Inc. 95,774 $ 317,970 1,211,987,366 Anterix, Inc. (a) (b) 16,962 838,941 Interactive Media & Services – 5.6% AT&T, Inc. 11,060,871 325,521,434 Alphabet, Inc.: ATN International, Inc. 17,036 805,292 Class A (a) 466,301 1,099,001,512 Bandwidth, Inc. (a) (b) 34,033 4,025,764 Class C (a) 446,972 1,077,899,796 Cincinnati Bell, Inc. (a) 84,225 1,297,065 ANGI Homeservices, Inc. Class A (a) 120,975 1,715,426 Cogent Communications Group, Inc. (b) 66,520 5,028,912 Autoweb, Inc. (a) (b) 6,653 19,028 Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (a) 110,609 1,035,300 Bumble, Inc. 77,109 3,679,641 Globalstar, Inc. (a) (b) 1,067,098 1,707,357 CarGurus, Inc. Class A (a) 136,717 3,858,154 IDT Corp. Class B (a) (b) 31,682 914,343 Cars.com, Inc. (a) 110,752 1,618,087 Iridium Communications, Inc. (a) 186,035 7,108,397 DHI Group, Inc. (a) (b) 99,689 319,005 Liberty Global PLC: Eventbrite, Inc. (a) 114,588 2,326,136 Class A (a) 196,087 5,355,136 EverQuote, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Telephone and Telegraph Company Divestiture: Background, Provisions, and Restructuring
    Report No. 84-58 E I -. <I?....*- ".YII. -n, -- THE AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY DIVESTITURE: BACKGROUND, PROVISIONS, AND RESTRUCTURING b Y Angele A. Gilroy Specialist in Industrial Organization Economics Division COLLECTION WKI HEKN !CNTUCKY LIBRARY April 11, 1984 11 i :::A L.'~~-l.ii.e makes jucn research available. without parti- ::;I.. in lr:m\ !orrns inc!uding studies. reports. cornpila- ;,)I!., I!:<?\[>. :md l:a~kqroi~ndhrietings. Cpon request. CRS .. ., :i ~ !>!r::z:rrir.e.;in ann1~-zingle+slative proposals and -tl:..b. :!nd in s>w;sinq the possible effects of these proposals . < :!I irie.The Ser~ice'ssenior specialists and ii,:c( r :iil.,;ii ?is are also at-aiiable for personal consultations ;xi-ir :.t>.;!?ecri\-elieid.; t~f'expertise. ABSTRACT On January 1, 1984, The American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) di- vested itself of a major portion of its organizational structure and functions. Under the post-divestiture environment the once fully-integrated Bell System is now reorganized into the "new" AT&T and seven Ladependent regional 5olding ?om- panies -- American Information Technologies Corp., 3ell Atlantic Corp., 3ell- South Corp., NYNEX Corp., Pacific Telesis Group., Southwestern Bell Corp., and U.S. West, Inc. The following analysis provides an overview of the pre- and post-divestiture organizational structure and details the evolution of the anti- trust action which resulted in this divestiture. CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................ iii INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1 1 . BELL SYSTEM CORPORATE REORGANIZATION .............................. 3 A . Predivestiture Bell System Corporate Structure ................ 3 B . Divested Operating Company Structure .......................... 5 C . Post-Divestiture AThT Organizational Structure ................ 7 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications 2016 Capitalization Rate Study
    2016 Capitalization Rate Study Revised 4/14/2016 Telecommunications MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Yield Capitalization Rate Study Industry: Telecommunications - Telephone 2016 Assessment Year Equity Measures Capital Asset Pricing Model 8.31% Page T-8 Dividend Growth Model (g = Dividend Growth) 8.50% Page T-20 Dividend Growth Model (g = Earnings Growth) 12.00% Page T-20 Dividend Growth Model (g = b x ROE) 9.60% Page T-20 Estimated Cost of Equity 9.00% Estimated Cost of Debt 6.00% Page T-27 Capital Structure Equity 61.00% Page T-11 Debt 39.00% Page T-11 Telephone - Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) Source of Capital Marginal Tax After-tax Cost of Capital Structure Cost of Capital Rate Capital Weighted Cost Equity 61.00% 9.00% 9.00% 5.49% Debt 39.00% 6.00% 38.00% 3.72% 1.45% WACC 100.00% 6.94% WACC (Rounded) 7.00% Page T-2 MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Yield Capitalization Rate Study Industry: Telecommunications - Wireless 2016 Assessment Year Equity Measures Capital Asset Pricing Model 8.85% Page T-8 Dividend Growth Model (g = Dividend Growth) 7.10% Page T-21 Dividend Growth Model (g = Earnings Growth) 8.70% Page T-21 Dividend Growth Model (g = b x ROE) 9.80% Page T-21 Estimated Cost of Equity 9.20% Estimated Cost of Debt 6.00% Page T-27 Capital Structure Equity 60.00% Page T-12 Debt 40.00% Page T-12 Wireless - Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) Source of Capital Marginal Tax After-tax Cost of Capital Structure Cost of Capital Rate Capital Weighted Cost Equity 60.00% 9.20% 9.20% 5.52% Debt 40.00% 6.00% 38.00% 3.72% 1.49% WACC
    [Show full text]
  • White Pages Information Manual
    March 25, 2020 White Pages Information Manual (Complete) 901 Wilshire Drive, Suite 485, Troy, Michigan 48084 248/244-6200 * www.localogy.com SECTION I This section contains the procedures for processing white page directory requests for changes in listed names, additions or deletions of listings, changes to listing sequence, or changes in the free classified Yellow Pages headings (SRL). Local Search Association - White Pages Manual www.localogy.com Procedure Questions Contact Ed Halasz at [email protected] White Pages Preparation (WP-3235) White Pages Procedures General In order to provide service to the National Yellow Pages Advertising client, CMRs may process White Pages directory requests for changes in listed names, additions or deletions of listings, changes to listing sequence, or changes in the free classified Yellow Pages heading (SRL). The Local Search Association™ (LSA™) White Pages Listing Request form (WP-3235) is used to make changes for both local and foreign listings, including 800 numbers. These forms may be obtained through LSA. Publishers may have their own internal processes; however, these should in no way impact the CMRs request via the WP-3235 form. It is in the best interest of the Publisher to process the CMRs request timely, efficiently, and accurately so the national clients advertising is not placed in jeopardy. Background Publishers act in different capacities. • A Publisher may also be a telephone company. In this capacity, there may be special regulations that apply because of Federal and/or State regulations. For example, a Publisher may require that a White Pages Regular Listing be established with their company before an order for a Bold White Pages Listing is accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 05-719 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission DA 05-719 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 1993 Annual Access Tariff Filings ) CC Docket No. 93-193 ) 1994 Annual Access Tariff Filings ) CC Docket No. 94-65 ) ORDER Adopted: March 17, 2005 Released: March 17, 2005 Responses from Verizon and BellSouth Due: April 18, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this order, we review the refund plans submitted by various price cap local exchange carriers (LECs) in response to the Commission’s order concluding the investigation of the 1993 and 1994 access tariffs of price cap LECs that implemented a sharing or lower formula adjustment in 1992 or 1993.1 We approve the refund filing of Qwest Corporation (Qwest), which results in no refund liability. We also approve the refund plans of SBC Communications Inc. (SBC), and the Sprint Incumbent Local Exchange Companies (the Sprint LECs), with the modifications we specify in this order. We disapprove the refund plans submitted by Verizon and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth). We direct Verizon and BellSouth to recalculate their refund liability using the proper methodology discussed below, and to resubmit their refund plans for our approval. II. BACKGROUND 2. Under price cap regulation, the maximum price a LEC can charge for its interstate access services is determined by the Price Cap Index (PCI), a complex formula that is adjusted annually by a measure of inflation minus a productivity factor, or “X” factor.2 The original price cap plan included certain “back stop” adjustments to the PCI. Specifically, the Commission required price cap LECs to share a portion of their earnings above a certain level with their interstate access customers by lowering their PCIs and rates in the following year.3 The Commission’s rules also permit price cap LECs that earn 1 1993 Annual Access Tariff Filings, CC Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Battle of the American Retiree”
    “The Battle of the American Retiree” In the year 2000, Qwest Communications, Inc. managed the hostile takeover of the former regional Bell operating company, U S WEST, beginning years of courts actions to preserve retirees’ pensions and benefits. AUSWR retirees experienced the hallmark of corporate greed overtake the moral sense American companies had stood for during their working years. Federal ERISA laws protected pensions, but all other benefits including health care and insurances were lost or reduced. Qwest top executives went to prison or were exacted heavy fines and penalties —but not for their actions that harmed pensions and benefits, but for illegal insider stock trades. The following pages —published for the first time —tell the story of AUSWR retirees’ who saw themselves disregarded by Qwest executives and federal courts during the Qwest Communications, Inc. era. Retiree Guardian Regional Editor Kitty Kennedy compiled this story and with former AUSWR Executive Director Nelson Phelps, a script and video were created telling the AUSWR retirees’ battles to hold on to earned pensions and benefits. In 2007 the intention was to submit the story to a major news channel broadcaster who had recently published a book about “the war on the American worker,” but news programs changed, the broadcaster left the station, and the opportunity was lost. We share our story now. Appreciation goes to the following for their support and generous sharing of information: Arnie Albrecht, Hazel Floyd, Robert Gehrman, Joseph Halpern, Wayne Howard, Mimi Hull, Curtis L. Kennedy, Phyllis Kielblock, Al Lewis -formerly of the Denver Post, Donnetta Mitchell, Mary Ann Neuman, Susan Olson, Nelson Phelps, Doris Randolph, Eldon Ranney, John Rommelfanger, Jeff Smith formerly of the Rocky Mountain News, George Strom, Eve Mary Verde, Julie Wilkinson.
    [Show full text]
  • 22-00220 107 First NW.Pdf
    Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 22-00220 New Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa Part of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) 22-01381 (December 1, 1999) Relationship: Contributing Noncontributing Contributes to a potential district with yet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) Listed De-listed NHL DOE 9-Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number Non-Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Northwestern Bell Telephone Building other names/site number American Legion Hall 2. Location street & number 107 First Street NW city or town Elkader vicinity, county Clayton Legal Description: (If Rural) Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 9 Lot(s) 2 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Category of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non-Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of: district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing site buildings 1 buildings structure sites sites object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter “N/A” if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Arch. & Hist. Resources of the Elkader Downtown Historic District MPD 22-030 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 10E Communications Facility (telephone exchange) 01B01 Duplex 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 09D05 Hip Roof foundation 10 Concrete 06C Classical Revival walls 03 Brick roof 08 Asphalt other Narrative Description ( SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Carterfone: My Story Nicholas Johnson
    Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal Volume 25 | Issue 3 Article 5 2009 Carterfone: My Story Nicholas Johnson Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Nicholas Johnson, Carterfone: My Story, 25 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 677 (2008). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol25/iss3/5 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CARTERFONE: MY STORY Nicholas Johnsont Abstract Thomas Carter invented the "Carterfone"-an acoustic coupling device that enabled the connection of a telephone handset to a radio transceiver.' AT&T, the dominant telephone company at the time, advised its customers that the Carterfone was a prohibited "interconnecting device" under FCC Tariff No. 132, which essentially made it unlawful for telephone subscribers to connect their own equipment to AT&T'S telephone network.2 Carter brought suit against AT&T in federal court, alleging that AT&T'S warnings to its3 customers constituted a violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Carter'ssuit ultimately culminated in the FCC's landmark Carterfone decision.4 In Carterfone, we held that "applicationof [FCC Tariff No. 132] to bar the Carterfone in the future would be unreasonable and unduly discriminatory... and that the provisionsprohibiting the use of customer-provided interconnecting devices should accordingly be stricken.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Prior Testimony
    RECORD OF EXPERT TESTIMONY ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2010 California Public Utilities Commission, O1 Communications, Inc. (U 6065 C) v. Verizon California., a California Corporation (U 1002 C), C.08-02-013 and Verizon California., a California Corporation (U 1002 C) v. O1 Communications, Inc. (U 6065 C) C. 09-06-025, on behalf of O1 Communications, Inc., Reply Testimony filed February 3, 2010. Witness: Lee L. Selwyn 2009 Illinois Commerce Commission, Frontier Communications Corporation, Verizon Communications, Inc., et al, Joint Application for Approval of a Reorganization, Docket No. 09-0268, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, Citizens Utility Board, Direct Testimony filed October 20, 2009, Rebuttal Testimony filed December 14, 2009. Witness: Lee L. Selwyn Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, James Thomas, on behalf of themselves, the general public, and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Global Vision Products, Inc., Antony Imbriolo, Derrike Cope, David L. Gordon, Powertel Technologies, Inc., Craig Dix, Henry Edelson and Robert Debenedictis, Defendants, Case No. RG03-091195, on behalf of the Law Offices of Scott A. Bursor, Oral testimony and cross examination on November 9, 2009. Witness: Colin B. Weir United States District Court, District of New Jersey, Judy Larson, Barry Hall, Joe Milliron, Tessie Robb, and Willie Davis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AT&T Mobility LLC f/k/a Cingular Wireless LLC and Sprint Nextel Corporation and Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint Nextel and Nextel Finance Company, Civ. Act. No. 07-5325 (JLL), on behalf of PinilisHalpern, LLP and Law Offices of Scott A.
    [Show full text]