DOCSLIB.ORG

Kent County Council Regarding the Proposal to the Electoral Review of Kent Phase 1 Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kent County Council Regarding the Proposal to the Electoral Review of Kent Phase 1 Consultation Egan, Helen From: Sent: 02 March 2015 17:26 To: Buck, Richard Cc: Reviews@; ; Subject: Electoral Review of Kent - Phase 1 Consultation Proposal Response Attachments: Letter to Richard Buck - 02 March 2015.pdf; Boundary Review Appendix 1 VF.docx; Appendix 2 VF.xlsx; Appendix 3 Boundary Review Response Table VF.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Mr Buck, Please find attached a letter addressed for your attention from Cllr Graham Gibbens, Chair of the Electoral and Boundary Review at Kent County Council regarding the proposal to the electoral review of Kent Phase 1 Consultation. If you would like to speak to Mr Gibbens about this please call me on the number below. Kind regards, Clare Clare Stewart | Executive Assistant to Graham Gibbens – Cabinet Member for Adult Social Care & Public Health | Strategic & Corporate Services | Kent County Council | Mezzanine Room G60, Sessions House, Maidstone, ME14 1XQ | | | www.kent.gov.uk | 1 Appendix 1: Kent Districts Commentary Ashford: The number of county divisions in the Ashford district remains at seven divisions. It is considered that the current boundaries for county divisions in Ashford well reflects community identities and therefore there is no reason to significantly change any Ashford divisions unless necessary. The existing Tenterden division is too small and the existing Ashford Rural West division is too large. This has been corrected by transferring WN2 Polling district from Ashford Rural West to Tenterden. This results in all of the proposed Ashford county divisions being within the 10% county average and it is recommended there is no further change. Canterbury: The number of county divisions in the Canterbury district has been reduced from nine divisions to eight. This has resulted in the need for a very considerable re-write of the existing Canterbury district county divisions. New ward boundaries have recently been established within the Canterbury district and there are three very large wards (Barton, Blean Forest and Heron). In developing the proposal for the Canterbury district it did seem appropriate to seek to retain these new large wards within individual county divisions where possible. However, to ensure the new Canterbury county divisions do all become within the 10% county average, it has been necessary to divide some wards at polling district level. It should be noted that on the proposal every ward sub division to polling district level is completely co-terminus within the suggested county division. Under the current county divisions it has been possible to have two by two member divisions along the coastal area (a two member division for Herne Bay and a two member division for Whitstable). As a result of the reduction of one county division in the Canterbury district and the consequent larger representation number, it is not possible to have four members representing the coastal area. It is therefore suggested that there should be a division called Whitstable which covers Seasalter and Gorall (effectively the central part of Whitstable). There would then be a further coastal division called Whitstable and Herne Bay Coast followed by a third coastal division called Herne Bay East. The remaining small coastal area at the east of Herne Bay will comprise the coastal ward of Reculver and spread inland to include Herne and Sturry. In the Canterbury urban area it is suggested that there should be two separate county divisions to cover most of the Canterbury urban area. In the divisions suggested, it is considered that these do most effectively reflect community identity within the Canterbury 1 urban area. This proposal for Canterbury also recognises the resolution of full council in July 2014 that there should be single member divisions wherever possible. The two Canterbury urban divisions would thus effectively comprise: 1. Canterbury City North East: Northgate, St Stephens, two polling districts from Westgate (one of which is presently in St Stephens) and one polling district from Blean Forest (RBF5) which is presently in Westgate ward and is in reality part of urban Canterbury. 2. Canterbury City South West: This to comprise all of the new very large Barton ward. It would also include most of Westgate ward and most of Wincheap ward. There remains two rural county divisions in the Canterbury district namely Canterbury North West and Canterbury South. It should be noted that Canterbury North West does extend through a rural area and then covers Chestfield which is on the edge of Whitstable. With the exception of Chestfield the two rural divisions do cover a range of rural parishes which are communities in their own right. It should be noted that the two suggested coastal divisions of Herne Bay East and Whitstable and Herne Bay Coast could become a single two member division. This is however not recommended because they would not in any respect represent any form of community identity. This results in all of the proposed Canterbury county divisions being within the 10% county average and is recommended. Dartford: The number of county divisions in the Dartford district remains at six divisions. It is considered that the present boundaries for county councillors in Dartford well reflects community identities and therefore there is no reason to significantly change any Dartford divisions unless necessary. The significant increase in forecast electorate in the existing Swanscombe & Greenhithe division will make it too large and the Dartford East division is too small. This can easily be corrected by transferring Castle ward from Swanscombe & Greenhithe to Dartford East. This results in all of the proposed Dartford county divisions being within the 10% county average and it is recommended there is no further change. Dover: The number of county divisions in the Dover district remains at seven divisions. The proposals for Dover have been drawn up recognising the resolution of full council in July 2014 that there should be single member divisions wherever possible. Dover Town does however very conveniently fit into a two member division and in reality it has proved very 2 difficult to break up into single member divisions. It is therefore proposed that there should be a two member division for Dover Town. At the present time there is a two member division called Deal. The Deal division does in fact comprise Deal and Walmer and these are two very separate communities. It is therefore proposed that there should be separate county divisions for Deal and Walmer. Sandwich is a community in its own right and there is a Sandwich division comprising Sandwich and its rural hinterland. Finally to complete the county division breakup for the Dover district divisions are described as Dover North and Dover West. This results in all of the proposed Dover district county divisions being within the 10% county average and is recommended. Gravesham: The number of county divisions in the Gravesham district remains at five divisions. The existing Gravesham Rural division is too large and it is clearly necessary to reduce the size of the division. A new division has been created called “Gravesend East” and this division covers some of the wards that were previously in the rural division along with some of the existing Gravesham East division. A two member division comprising much of the centre of Gravesend remains and called “Gravesend Town”. A further division is recommended for Gravesham West (could be called Northfleet & Gravesend West). This results in all of the proposed Gravesham county divisions being within the 10% county average and is recommended. Maidstone: The number of county divisions in the Maidstone District remains at nine divisions. It is considered that the current boundaries for county divisions in Maidstone well reflect community identities and therefore no reason to significantly change any Maidstone division unless necessary. Within the existing Maidstone county divisions Maidstone Rural South is too small. This situation can be remedied by adjusting certain wards between Maidstone Rural West and Maidstone Rural South. The other divisions in the Maidstone district do largely satisfy the requirements of the boundary commission in defining county divisions and especially in relation to community identity. 3 Maidstone Central is a very satisfactory two member division at present and comprises a range of wards in the centre and west of Maidstone. Maidstone North East comprises the wards in the urban north east part of Maidstone. Maidstone South and Maidstone South East are both single member county divisions comprising urban wards in Maidstone. All of the rural wards in the Maidstone district do properly reflect individual parishes and communities. This results in all of the proposed Maidstone county divisions being within the 10% county average and is recommended. Sevenoaks: The number of county divisions in the Sevenoaks District is reduced from seven divisions to six divisions. This will provide the opportunity for the Swanley division to encompass more of the area that in reality is in Swanley. If the whole of Swanley is put into one division it becomes slightly too large. It is therefore proposed that Swanley Village (polling district CO) should be placed within the proposed Darent Valley division. It is appreciated that Swanley Village has more community identity with Swanley. The transfer of this polling district is solely to meet the percentage variance criteria. The remainder of the Sevenoaks District after separating out Swanley has been divided across the five remaining county divisions. This results in all of the proposed Sevenoaks county divisions being within the 10% county average and is recommended. Shepway: The number of county divisions in the Shepway district remains at six divisions. In the existing county division structure for the Shepway district the two divisions of Romney Marsh and Elham Valley are significantly too large. The makeup of the Romney Marsh division is entirely restricted by its boundaries of East Sussex, Ashford district and the sea.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Kentish Hospitals Re-Examined: S. Mary, Ospringe, and Ss. Stephen and Thomas, New Romney*
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 79 1964 TWO KENTISH HOSPITALS RE-EXAMINED: S. MARY, OSPRINGE, AND SS. STEPHEN AND THOMAS, NEW ROMNEY* By S. E. RIGOLD, F.S.A. THE hospitals here considered were both products of the great age of medieval hospital-founding, in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries. From that age fifteen out of the twenty-five known hospitals in Kent originate, five being earlier and five later. Perhaps more than any other of these (except the unfortunate house of Sweynester in Sittingbourne), these two were unable to adapt themselves to the changing conditions of the fourteenth century, yet they differed widely in purpose and status: Ospringe had royal patronage and performed several of the various functions later assigned to more specialized institutions that have inherited the name of hospital; Romney was of comparatively humble foundation and solely a refuge for lepers. Both houses have already been the subjects of detailed studies in Archceologia Cantiana, since when it has been part of the writer's official duty to investigate their physical remains and he has taken the oppor- tunity to submit the limited, documentary evidence, as it were, to a second pressing. It is this, rather than any attempt to test the relevance of two such divergent samples to the general problem of the social history of the medieval hospital, that is the reason for considering them together here. THE HOSPITAL OF ST. MARY OF OSPRINGE, COMMONLY CALLED MAISON DIETT The late Charles H. Drake published a valuable paper on this house in Arch. Cant., xxx (1913), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 March 2010 Swale Borough Council List of Current Applications
    15 March 2010 Swale Borough Council List of current applications received by Swale Borough Council for determination which are available for inspection at the Planning Services, East Street, Sittingbourne, Kent. Copies of applications are also available for inspection at the appropriate District Office (Please see notes). You may also view planning applications via our partnership with the UK Planning website (www.ukplanning.com/swale), but this may take up to 7 days to be completed. You may submit any observations on any application via the website. Please note that any observations that you wish to make on applications should be received either in writing (at the above address) or via e-mail to [email protected] within three weeks of the date of this list (please quote the full application reference in any correspondence or e-mail). In the interests of economy an acknowledgement will not be sent. If you do write to express an interest in an application, you will be informed of the decision in due course. On certain applications it may be some time before a decision is reached. Minster Application Ref SW/09/0398 AJS Case No. 23296 Case Officer A J Spiers Location Land to rear of 145 Barton Hill Drive,Minster,Sheppey,Kent,ME12 3LZ Proposal Barn for storage Applicants Name Mr Lee Raymond 141 Ward Hill Road, Minster , Sheppey , Kent , ME12 2JZ Sheldwich,Badlesmere & Leaveland Application Ref SW/10/0122 AJS Case No. 07814 Case Officer A J Spiers Location 5 Godfrey Cottages,Ashford Road,Badlesmere,Nr Faversham,Kent,ME13 0NX Proposal Rear extension to kitchen and replacement of existing flat felt roof with pitched natural slate roof.
    [Show full text]
  • 44 Planning Committee Report - 29 March 2018 ITEM 2.1
    Planning Committee Report - 29 March 2018 ITEM 2.1 PLANNING COMMITTEE – 29 MARCH 2018 PART 2 Report of the Head of Planning PART 2 Applications for which PERMISSION is recommended 2.1 REFERENCE NO - 18/500310/OUT APPLICATION PROPOSAL Outline application (Some Matters Reserved) for demolition of existing dwelling and erection of 3no. dwellings with associated car barn, parking, and gardens. Access being sought only. ADDRESS Archirondal Toll Road Lynsted Sittingbourne Kent ME9 0RH RECOMMENDATION – Grant subject to conditions REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE Parish Council Objection WARD Teynham And PARISH/TOWN COUNCIL APPLICANT Mrs Eileen Lynsted Lynsted With Kingsdown Spittles AGENT Designscape Consultancy Limited DECISION DUE DATE PUBLICITY EXPIRY DATE 13/03/18 22/02/18 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY (including appeals and relevant history on adjoining sites): App No Proposal Decision Date 17/505194/OUT Outline application (Some Matters Reserved) Refused 08.01.2018 for demolition of existing dwelling and erection of 4no. dwellings with associated car barns, parking, and gardens. Access being sought only. 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SITE 1.01 The site is currently occupied by a modern detached 3 bedroom chalet bungalow with a large garden to the side and rear. To the front of the property is a long paved driveway which gives access to the property (and to Toll House) from Toll Road at a point close to its junction with Lynsted Lane. The site lies within the defined built-area of the village as defined on the Local Plan’s proposals map. 1.02 The site backs on to the rear gardens of four of the properties located in The Vallance and wraps around the rear garden of Toll House which also uses the access from Toll Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Faversham Town Application Ref SW/08/0387 HVM Case No
    14TH July 2008 Swale Borough Council List of current applications received by Swale Borough Council for determination which are available for inspection at the Planning Services, East Street, Sittingbourne, Kent. Copies of applications are also available for inspection at the appropriate District Office (Please see notes). You may also view planning applications via our partnership with the UK Planning website (www.ukplanning.com/swale), but this may take up to 7 days to be completed. You may submit any observations on any application via the website. Please note that any observations that you wish to make on applications should be received either in writing (at the above address) or via e-mail to [email protected] within three weeks of the date of this list (please quote the full application reference in any correspondence or e-mail). In the interests of economy an acknowledgement will not be sent. If you do write to express an interest in an application, you will be informed of the decision in due course. On certain applications it may be some time before a decision is reached. Faversham Town Application Ref SW/08/0387 HVM Case No. 22951 Case Officer Heather Murton Location 25 St Mary's Road,Faversham,Kent,ME13 8EH Proposal Works to front of property area, new garden wall, new cellar cover with vent & gravel front area. Applicants Name Miss Lyndsay Wake Applicant Miss Lyndsay Wake, 25 St Marys Road, Faversham, Kent, ME13 8EH Faversham Town Application Ref SW/08/0441 CLD Case No. 12765 Case Officer Claire Dethier Location 62A Abbey Street,Faversham,Kent,ME13 7BN Proposal To create a domestic garden to the rear of our house, on land that is at present disused.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-Faversham-Circuit
    WESLEYAN METHODIST HISTORIC ROLL VOLUME 8 KENT DISTRICT FAVERSHAM CIRCUIT Page 41 BRANSON Benj 7 Albion Terrace Faversham BRANSON Annie 7 Albion Terrace Faversham BRANSON James J 100 High Street Brentford BRANSON Harold 7 Albion Terrace Faversham BRANSON Annie May 7 Albion Terrace Faversham BRANSON Constance M 7 Albion Terrace Faversham BRANSON Sidney E 7 Albion Terrace Faversham GEORGE Ann Edith Road Faversham DAWSON Wm G 40 Ospringe Rd Faversham DAWSON M F 40 Ospringe Rd Faversham DAWSON Bessie H 40 Ospringe Rd Faversham DAWSON Arthur E 40 Ospringe Rd Faversham DAWSON Alice Mary 40 Ospringe Rd Faversham DAWSON William G 40 Ospringe Rd Faversham DAWSON Lilian Frances 40 Ospringe Rd Faversham DAWSON Howard Day 40 Ospringe Rd Faversham NEWRING Daniel 51 Newton Road Faversham NEWRING Henrietta 51 Newton Road Faversham NEWRING Louisa 51 Newton Road Faversham NEWRING Elizabeth In Memoriam NEWRING Fred In Memoriam TURNER William J 28 Ospringe Road Faversham ASHBURN Sarah 12 Albion Terrace Faversham RATCLIFFE Eliza 39 Court Street Faversham KINGSNORTH Alfred Cemetery Lodge Faversham WILSON Thomas Cemetery Lodge Faversham WILSON Elizabeth Jane Cemetery Lodge Faversham WILSON Winifred Susannah Cemetery Lodge Faversham FULLER Edward Stone St Faversham FULLER Ann Stone St Faversham FULLER Fredrick W Stone St Faversham FULLER Elizabeth A Stone St Faversham FULLER Earnest T Stone St Faversham FULLER Harry Stone St Faversham PEPPER John St Mary's Road Faversham Page 42 DOUGLASS Jessie ?? 3 Garfield Place Faversham DOUGLASS Charles John 3 Garfield
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Itinerary Here
    First FTHE HOMEr OF EuitNGLISH CHERRIES faversham.org/walking TEYNHAM – CONYER – LEWSON STREET – LYNSTED The home of “Loveliest of trees, the cherry now… is hung with bloom English cherries along the bough” AE Housman Building legacy … Discover the home of English cherries on this unique trail BRICKS THAT BUILT LONDON through the fruit bowl of Britain and the heart of Kent. From manicured orchards to distant reminders of the area’s industrious brick-making past, you’ll be bowled over by the tranquil beauty of this rich oasis, grazed by sheep and adorned with blossom in spring and abundant fruit in summer. At every turn you’ll understand why Teynham was the place Henry VIII chose to plant his historic orchards - the birthplace of the English cherries we know and love today. Your First Fruit trail begins close to the site of the King’s original 105-acre orchards at The many brickfields that thrived in Osiers Farm and New Gardens, to the west of Station Road. and around Teynham, Conyer and While areas of the expansive orchards planted by the monarch’s fruiterer Richard Harris Faversham are famous for the role they have been built on, you don’t have to walk far before fruit trees greet you, lining your played in supplying London’s Victorian route through grazed pastures to the picturesque coastal hamlet of Conyer. building boom. The brickearth and chalk that made the The area’s renowned rich soil was once in great demand, not just for agriculture, but area so fertile for growing top fruit was also for brick making.
    [Show full text]
  • Teynham Area of Opportunity 5.5.30 Teynham Is Centrally Located Within Swale and Is One of the Largest Villages in the Borough
    Teynham Area of Opportunity 5.5.30 Teynham is centrally located within Swale and is one of the largest villages in the Borough. It is defined in this plan as a Rural Local Service Centre as it supports the needs of the existing community and the settlements around it. The village owes much of its good range of services (including primary school, GP surgery, library and retail) and public transport provision to its position along the main Roman Road Watling Street (Greenstreet). 5.5.31 Teynham village is made up of a number of historic settlements including Greenstreet, Cellar Hill and Barrow Green. The London Road running through the village marks the boundary between Lynsted with Kingsdown Parish to the south and Teynham Parish to the north. 5.5.32 The straight alignment of the London Road through Teynham owes much to its Roman origins and gives the ‘high street’ in Teynham a distinctive linear character. The presence of medieval and post medieval buildings (particularly around Cellar Hill), but also dotted along the London Road and in the countryside around the village, provide evidence of the long-standing agricultural prosperity of the area, made possible by the rich soils of the north Kent fruit belt. The arrival of the railway north of Greenstreet in the 19th century led to the growth of the village towards the train station. Subsequent development over the 20th century has filled in the land between Watling Street and the railway line. 5.5.33 The countryside around Teynham is rural and agricultural in character and use.
    [Show full text]
  • Loxley House Lynsted Lane | Lynsted | Sittingbourne | Kent | ME9 0RL Seller Insight
    Loxley House Lynsted Lane | Lynsted | Sittingbourne | Kent | ME9 0RL Seller Insight Newly built by the current owner, Loxley house is an executive detached family home with quality fixtures and fittings throughout, located in a fabulous rural setting between the Coast and the Kent Downs. “This is a homely house in a beautiful area, with a lovely feel about it” says the owner. “Reached via a sweeping 100 metre gravel drive, it is the ideal quiet, peaceful home.” The property comprises four double bedrooms, three bathrooms, two large reception rooms and a contemporary kitchen/breakfast room with adjoining utility room. The detached double garage, with fitted kitchen to the rear and underfloor heating, has space above, which could provide annexe potential with another floor. “The house is beautifully finished” says the owner, “but final touches and details could be made in collaboration with the new owner according to their personal taste, for example whether there should be carpets or tiles or wooden floorboards laid over the underfloor heating, or how the pretty front and rear gardens should be planted. There is a lot of scope to really make this house your own.” “The local area is lovely” the owner continues, “and the neighbours very friendly. There is fantastic pub just 800 yards away with live music and great food, while just a mile away is the sought after market town of Faversham with its excellent schools including the renowned preparatory school at Lorendon and Queen Elizabeth’s Grammar School.” Among Britain’s most charming historic towns, Faversham boasts hundreds of listed buildings and, dating from pre-Roman times, is even mentioned in the Domesday Book.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 September 2009 Swale Borough Council List of Current Applications
    22 September 2009 Swale Borough Council List of current applications received by Swale Borough Council for determination which are available for inspection at the Planning Services, East Street, Sittingbourne, Kent. Copies of applications are also available for inspection at the appropriate District Office (Please see notes). You may also view planning applications via our partnership with the UK Planning website (www.ukplanning.com/swale), but this may take up to 7 days to be completed. You may submit any observations on any application via the website. Please note that any observations that you wish to make on applications should be received either in writing (at the above address) or via e-mail to [email protected] within three weeks of the date of this list (please quote the full application reference in any correspondence or e- mail). In the interests of economy an acknowledgement will not be sent. If you do write to express an interest in an application, you will be informed of the decision in due course. On certain applications it may be some time before a decision is reached. Faversham Town Application Ref SW/09/0608 CLD Case No. 05248 Case Officer Claire Dethier Location 23A Preston Street, Faversham, Kent, ME13 8NZ Proposal Change of use to office to provide three first floor and one second floor residential flats and rear two storey extension to provide two further flats. Applicants Name Mr Peter Attraell Agent Mr Patrick Jordan, Wynkham Jordan Architects, 7 Bramley Avenue, Faversham, Kent, ME13 8NL Upchurch Application Ref SW/09/0642 EE Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • Lynsted Singles.Qxd
    L ynsted Published September 2002 Parish Design Statement Incorporating Design Guidelines as Supplementary Planning Guidance for Lynsted & Kingsdown. Adopted by Swale Borough Council 30th April 2002. During the last 18 months our group of volunteers has learnt a great deal about what we value in our surroundings. These are often features of the landscape and buildings that we take for granted but which give the parish of Lynsted and Kingsdown its unique character. We have taken great care to lis- ten to as many people as possible and to bring these views into the Statement. I would like to thank everyone who spoke to us, wrote to us, completed questionnaires and attended our public events. I hope you enjoy looking through the document. The Design Statement is intended as guidance to residents and those parties involved in shaping our environment. It is through this document that we, as a community, are having an influence on our environment, identifying the characteristics that we believe are important and wish to preserve. Ours is a living community and, therefore, a changing community. We can face up to that change with the confidence that everything we value will be protected and enhanced. David Powell Co-ordinator The production of the Lynsted Parish Design Statement has been made possible by the following, to whom we extend our thanks: Members past and present of the Lynsted Parish Design Statement Group and the people of the Parish Barrett & Co Ltd Coolchain European Regional Development Fund David Ferrett Harrisons Kent Down AONB Kent Rural Community Council Lynsted Parish Council David Murphy Shell’s “Employment Action” Scheme Swale Borough Council David Vasan Contents Parish context 4 The character of the landscape and setting 5 Settlement pattern and character 10 Building and spaces 12 Highways and traffic 16 The Supplementary Planning Guidance: Lynsted and Kingsdown Design Guidelines Annexes 18 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Decision Notices Issued by the Head of Development Services
    SCHEDULE OF DECISION NOTICES ISSUED BY THE HEAD OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOVEMBER 2005 Application Applicant Proposed Development Planning Decision Decision Date SW/05/1167 Mr & Mrs D Taylor Proposed two storey side extension – 1 APPROVED with 01.11.05 conditions (C21414) Canberra Gardens, Sittingbourne SW/05/1055 South East Holiday Parks Variation of condition (i) of planning REFUSED 01.11.05 (C4248) Limited permission NK/8/50/81 to allow occupancy of site from 1st March to 1st January – Elmhurst Caravan Park, Second Avenue, Eastchurch, Sheerness SW/05/0593 Mr A Hanmer Retrospective application for change of use APPROVED with 01.11.05 (C21308) of garage to storage and games room – 34 conditions Rettendon Drive, Milton, Sittingbourne SW/05/1138 Mr & Mrs Logan Single storey rear extension – 25 Coleman APPROVED 01.11.05 (C21565) Drive, Kemsley SW/05/1172 Mr Roy Reid Retrospective application for the erection of REFUSED 01.11.05 (C18240) a raised decked area to the rear and side of the property including access to the rear side and doors – 40 Cliff Gardens, Minster, Sheerness SW/05/1179 Mr Mark Hutchins Demolish existing chalet rebuild in brick – APPROVED with 01.11.05 (C1057) 122 Park Avenue Holiday Village, Leysdown conditions SW/05/1151 Mr E Reynolds Erection of white pvcu conservatory to rear – APPROVED with 01.11.05 (C21071) 17 Dane Close, Hartlip conditions - 1 - Application Applicant Proposed Development Planning Decision Decision Date TC/05/0072 Mr R O Linforth Removal of two conifers – Chestnut House, APPROVED 01.11.05 89 The Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Swale Borough Council Notice of Applications
    Swale Borough Council Notice of Applications 16/507117/FULL - SHIRE LANE COTTAGE STALISFIELD ROAD STALISFIELD KENT ME13 0JA - Erection of a detached outbuilding to provide garaging and home office ancillary. Reasons: 1, 4 16/507118/LBC - SHIRE LANE COTTAGE STALISFIELD ROAD STALISFIELD ME13 0JA - Listed Building Consent for erection of a detached outbuilding to provide garaging and home office ancillary.Reason: 4 16/507030/FULL - WALLEND FARM LOWER ROAD MINSTER-ON-SEA KENT - Replacement of fire damaged western building with alterations to its external appearance to include an increase in ridge height to 14.5m. Minor widening and realignment of access track to Swale Way. Realignment of existing bund with additional landscaping. Reason: 5 16/507155/LBC - FERRY HOUSE INN HARTY FERRY ROAD LEYSDOWN KENT ME12 4BQ - Listed Building Consent demolition of the Yachtsman’s Ablutions building (in relation with the application ref 15/510681/FULL). Reason: 4 16/507079/LBC - BEGGARS ROOST THE STREET LYNSTED KENT ME9 0RH - Listed Building Consent to remove and replace roof to include first floor office and kids play area, with the insertion of rear dormers and new windows and door on the ground and first floor.Reason: 4 16/505597/FULL - LAND ADJACENT TO NEW CREEK ROAD FAVERSHAM KENT ME13 7BU - Erection of 2No. detached chalet bungalows and associated parking. Reason: 1 16/506696/FULL - LAND AT CASTLE ROAD EUROLINK SITTINGBOURNE KENT - Erection of a building for B8 use with ancillary office space, lorry parking and cafe with ancillary overnight accommodation for drivers, car parking and landscaping, together with associated ancillary structures and works, including smoking and cycle shelters, underground diesel tank and refuelling facilities, electrical plug in units, electricity sub- station, security gates and fencing.
    [Show full text]