DOCSLIB.ORG

Re-Energizing the Baltic Lithuania and Its Neighbors Explore Energy Independence Through Nuclear Power

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Re-Energizing the Baltic Lithuania and Its Neighbors Explore Energy Independence Through Nuclear Power RE-ENERGIZING THE BALTIC Lithuania and its neighbors explore energy independence through nuclear power By Dr. Gregory Gleason, Marshall center P ER C ONCORDI A M ILLUS T R ati ON he official opening in July 2012 of pursue energy interconnections with poland naTo’s energy security Centre and sweden. Two new liquefied natural gas of excellence in the Lithuanian plants, one in estonia and one in Lithuania capital of Vilnius marks an (klaipeda) are being developed. polish important milestone for the north authorities have announced plans to scrap atlantic community and the their coal-fired generation export capacity in Tbaltic countries in particular. The baltic compliance with environmental regulations, countries’ high dependence on imported opening opportunities for greater regional energy has long made them vulnerable to cooperation with the baltic states. supply disruption and price volatility. The The naTo energy security Centre of naTo summit in riga in 2006 recognized excellence will be primarily concerned with the growing importance of energy security, advancing security capacity with respect advancing energy issues to a high priority to vulnerabilities, particularly concerning in the naTo agenda. energy interruption from either intentional The Lithuanian government in 2010 or accidental causes. The naTo center is established the Lithuanian energy security devoted to developing advanced knowledge Center as an aspect of the country’s national and best practices with respect to naTo energy strategy. The transformation of security interests. assessment of energy the Lithuanian energy center to a naTo fuel vulnerabilities will very likely include energy security Centre of excellence, as analysis of aggregate data on energy supply, Lithuanian president Dalia Grybauskaitė demand and transit. a secondary but never- explained at the naTo summit in Chicago theless important concern of the naTo in May 2012, “is a practical contribution to center concerns nuclear power throughout naTo’s efforts in the field of energy secu- the baltic region. rity and smart defense.” 1 as a naTo Centre This is a complex issue, involving not of excellence, it is designed to provide only technical questions of capacity and the analysis, assessments, recommendations political commitment to nuclear energy and proposals for efficient energy solutions but also the very complex and politically designed to support military, scientific, tech- charged issue of competition over markets, nical and academic analysis. energy vulnerabilities and national strategic Lithuania stands out as an exception- priorities. some Lithuanians oppose nuclear ally industrious and innovative country in power as a source of energy – a national addressing the many aspects of contem- referendum has been scheduled for october porary energy challenges. The Lithuanian 14, 2012, to put the reconstruction of the government has strived to achieve greater Lithuanian nuclear power plant at Visaginas energy economy, stressing conservation, to a public vote. but even if Lithuanian efficiency and prospects for carbon seques- voters endorse the plan to construct a new tration. The Lithuanian energy security nuclear power plant to replace the electric- Center has devoted special attention to find ity previously supplied by a soviet-era plant ways to engage the public sector, industry that was closed in 2009, competition has and the academic community in a search emerged over baltic and east european for solutions to reduce the dependence of power markets. it is a commercial competi- Lithuania’s military on fossil fuels and to tion but has clear geopolitical implications. find energy substitutes during military oper- ations and exercises. Lithuania has joined BACKGROUND: BALTIC NUCLEAR POWER the other baltic countries in developing For many years the baltic region relied plans for a baltic energy security commu- on power supplied by the ignalina power nity, closely linking the three baltic states to plant. The soviet-era nuclear plant went per Concordiam 27 Technicians stand near a nuclear reactor head at the Ignalina nuclear power plant, which Lithuania took off line at the end of 2009. AFP/GETTY IMAGES on line in 1983, powered by two rbMk-1500 Mwe decommission the plant as well as for investor rights and water-cooled graphite-moderated, channel-type power obligations. however, the commercial viability of this new reactors. These reactors were similar in design to those plant was based on the assumption of an electric power of the Chernobyl power plant. after the disintegration market throughout the baltic states as well as electricity of the soviet union in 1991, these plants raised qualms sales to poland. among west europeans who were otherwise anxious to Meanwhile, outside Lithuania, decisions affect- welcome the baltic countries to the european community. ing power markets in the region having to do with in accordance with the provisions of the european union environmental risks have been taken independent of accession agreement, Lithuania agreed to decommis- Lithuanian priorities. russia’s electric nuclear power sion the ignalina’s reactors. as the nuclear power plant company, rosenergoatom, announced plans to build a went offline in 2009, Lithuania shifted to relying on the nuclear power plant in russia’s kaliningrad province. elektrėnai power plant (epp), a thermal power facility, for The 2300-Mw baltic nuclear power plant was sched- 70 percent of the country’s electricity. a european bank uled to be constructed in the town of nemen on the for reconstruction and Development–financed upgrade province’s eastern border with Lithuania. at the same improved the epp. but the natural gas to fuel the plant time, rosenergoatom announced plans to build a similar has been purchased primarily from Gazprom, russia’s nuclear power station in belarus. it identified a construc- national gas producer. tion site in astravets in the hrodno region, a town located in June 2007, the Lithuanian parliament passed legis- only 50 kilometers from Lithuania’s capital of Vilnius. lation to build a new nuclear power complex near the The belarusian nuclear power plant (npp) is old ignalina plant at Visaginas. This facility would assure regarded by many, in the words of Lithuanian Foreign electricity not only for Lithuania but for other countries Minister audronius azubalis, as a “provocation.”2 The in the region. Lietuvos energija concluded agreements Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign affairs sent a diplomatic with Latvia’s as Latvenergo, estonian eesti energia and note of objection to the belarusian Ministry of Foreign poland’s polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne sa in which affairs. The diplomatic note included a Lithuanian all the partners indicated an interest in taking part in environmental impact assessment of the proposed the project. Lithuania signed a concession agreement belarusian npp. The belarusian Ministry of Foreign on March 30, 2012, with Ge-hitachi to construct a affairs did not respond. 1,350-Mw advanced boiling water reactor. The agree- ment provided the general framework for the Visaginas ENERGY SECURITY AND THE NUCLEAR FUTURE nuclear power plant, including provisions for the rights The nuclear power plants being discussed in the baltic of the project company to design, construct, operate and region are still at a stage where decisions are not yet final. 28 per Concordiam Russian leaders stand near a model of the nuclear power plant they plan to build in the Kaliningrad region. The plant represents a commercial challenge to Lithuania’s nuclear industry, which is trying to provide greater energy independence for the Baltic region. AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE but nuclear power decisions are long-term decisions. The first generation of nuclear power reactors had when the decisions are taken they can be expected to an expected operational life of 25 to 30 years. newer have consequences that will endure for decades. The generation reactors are expected to last 40 to 60 years. startup of a power generation project is preceded by a Decommissioning involves administrative and technical planning period devoted to determining commercial actions, including all cleanup of radioactivity, dismantle- viability. The assessment includes investment analysis ment of the site and securing hazardous materials. once designed to determine capital budgeting projections. a facility is decommissioned, there should no longer be a The appraisal must include a market analysis, an assess- danger of a radioactive hazard and the facility is released ment of the expected rate of return and a calculation of from regulatory oversight. Decommissioning is likely to the payback period based on an amortization plan. The become big business in europe, and Lithuanian nuclear future is always uncertain, hence assessments are not technicians and engineers may have a distinct advantage based on facts; they are based on reasonable assumptions in this competitive arena. regarding profitability given the overall state of the econ- The security issues related to national energy policies, omy, market demand, generation revenue, expenditures, political implications of commercial energy competition, accident risk and insurance, borrowing interest rates, as well as the issues relating to nuclear decommissioning currency risk, management costs and other prognostica- and nuclear nonproliferation, are of considerable signifi- tions. Technical market analysis is based on forecasting cance for european energy security. it is fitting that the given assumptions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Transformation?
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED - PUBLICLY DISCLOSED What is Transfor?mation NATO UNCLASSIFIED - PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Intentionally Blank NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED What is Transformation? An Introduction to Allied Command Transformation (January 2015) NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED WHAT IS TRANSFORMATION? – AN INTRODUCTION TO ALLIED COMMAND TRANSFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword....................................................................................................................... i Preface......................................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1: Transformation – Definition, Strategic Environment and Role of ACT........ 1 Chapter 2: Transformation – Key Enablers & Tools..................................................... 5 Chapter 3: Transformation – Cooperation, Interaction & Engagement...................... 15 Chapter 4: Transformation – The Transatlantic Bond................................................ 25 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 26 Annex A: The ACT Command Structure Annex B: Glossary of Abbreviations NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Foreword (by Lieutenant General Phil Jones, Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Commander Transformation) When Allied Command Transformation (ACT)
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's 60Th Anniversary Summit
    NATO’s 60th Anniversary Summit Paul Belkin, Coordinator Analyst in European Affairs Carl Ek Specialist in International Relations Lisa Mages Information Research Specialist Derek E. Mix Analyst in European Affairs April 14, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40454 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress NATO’s 60th Anniversary Summit Summary On April 3 and 4, 2009, the heads of state and government of the 26 members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) met in Strasbourg, France, and Kehl, Germany for a summit marking the 60th anniversary of the alliance. The summit was one of three stops on President Obama’s first official visit to Europe as President. Alliance leaders used the anniversary summit to pay tribute to NATO’s past achievements and to reaffirm their commitment to the alliance as the preeminent transatlantic security framework. They also completed a new round of NATO enlargement, sought common positions on the range of challenges currently facing the alliance, and began to set the parameters for NATO’s future direction. The key issue facing the alliance is the ongoing mission in Afghanistan, where allied governments are struggling to reach a strategic consensus on how to stabilize the country. The deteriorating security situation in the country has caused many to question the ability of NATO’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) to achieve its objectives and has exposed rifts within the alliance as to ISAF’s mission and the appropriate means to accomplish it. NATO’s strained relations with Russia are a second key issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prague Summit and Nato's Transformation
    THE PRAGUE SUMMIT AND NATO’S TRANSFORMATION NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION 1110 Brussels - Belgium Web site: www.nato.int E-mail: [email protected] A READER’S GUIDE THE PRAGUE SUMMIT AND NATO’S TRANSFORMATION SUMMIT AND NATO’S THE PRAGUE PRARGENG0403 A READER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 3 I THE SUMMIT DECISIONS 9 II KEY ISSUES 19 New members: Expanding the zone of security 20 New capabilities: Adapting to modern challenges 26 New relationships: Practical cooperation and dialogue 34 After Prague: The road ahead 67 © NATO 2003 NATO INVITEES Country* Capital Population GDP Defence Active Troop *Data based on (million) (billion expenditures Strength national sources Euros) (million Euros) Bulgaria (25) Sofia 7.8 16.9 494 (2.9% GDP) 52 630 Estonia (27) Tallin 1.4 6.8 130 (1.9% GDP) 4 783 Latvia (33) Riga 2.3 8.8 156 (1.8% GDP) 9 526 Lithuania (34) Vilnius 3.5 14.5 290 (2.0% GDP) 17 474 Romania (36) Bucharest 22.3 47.9 1117 (2.3% GDP) 99 674 Slovakia (38) Bratislava 5.4 24.9 493 (2.0% GDP) 29 071 ★ Slovenia (39) Ljubljana 2.0 22.4 344 (1.5% GDP) 7 927 III DOCUMENTATION 71 Prague Summit Declaration – 21 November 2002 72 Prague Summit Statement on Iraq – 21 November 2002 78 Announcement on Enlargement – 21 November 2002 79 Report on the Comprehensive Review of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and Partnership for Peace - 21 November 2002 80 Partnership Action Plan Against Terrorism - 21 November 2002 87 Chairman’s Summary of the Meeting of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council at Summit Level – 22 November 2002 94 Statement by NATO
    [Show full text]
  • Info Document on Nato Summit
    214 SESA 18 E Original: English Annual Session KEY OUTCOMES OF THE SUMMIT OF NATO HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT HELD IN BRUSSELS, BELGIUM, ON 11-12 JULY 2018 Information document www.nato-pa.int October 2018 214 SESA 18 E TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 II. NATO’S MISSION & VALUES .............................................................................. 2 III. THREAT ENVIRONMENT.................................................................................... 3 IV. PRIORITIES ......................................................................................................... 3 A. BURDEN SHARING ............................................................................................. 3 B. DETERRENCE AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE, AND RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA ................................................................................................................ 7 1. Relations with Russia ........................................................................................... 7 2. Collective Defence and Deterrence ...................................................................... 7 C. PROJECTING STABILITY AND COMBATTING TERRORISM .......................... 10 D. MODERNISING THE ALLIANCE ....................................................................... 11 E. NATO-EU COOPERATION ................................................................................ 12 V. 70TH ANNIVERSARY AND 2019 .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for the 2021 NATO Leaders' Meeting
    AT A GLANCE Prospects for the 2021 NATO leaders' meeting An in-person NATO summit of heads of state or government is scheduled to take place in Brussels on 14 June 2021. Highly anticipated, as part of United States President Joe Biden's first overseas visit, the summit is expected to outline NATO's strategic direction in the decade ahead. The NATO 2030 agenda will be debated, and forward- looking discussions about long-term threats and challenges to Euro-Atlantic security and defence are expected. A summit to future-proof the transatlantic alliance The June 2021 NATO summit will be the culmination of Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg's 'NATO 2030' process (see below). With the previous summit having taken place in December 2019 in London, United Kingdom, this summit is scheduled at a time of reflection about the future adaptation of the Alliance, challenges to the rules-based international order, geopolitical competition, and against the backdrop of the withdrawal from Afghanistan, where NATO Allies have been deployed since 2001. Secretary General Stoltenberg has formulated eight proposals to 'form the core of the Summit agenda', which are under negotiation in the North Atlantic Council, NATO's principal political decision-making body. These intend to reinforce the 'unity between Europe and North America', to broaden 'NATO's approach to security', and to safeguard rules-based multilateralism. Solutions include providing for closer political consultations, renewing commitments to collective defence and envisioning concrete measures to strengthen resilience − including safe infrastructure and supply chains. To this end, on 31 May 2021, Romania inaugurated the Euro-Atlantic Centre for Resilience intended as a hub to promote the EU and NATO's resilience objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit, 2021
    NATO summit, 2021 June 16, 2021 In news The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) held its 31st summit in Brussels on June 14th Key highlights of the summit NATO leaders largely backed US President Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan. During the summit, the NATO members issued a communiqué highlighting the “threat” presented by Russia and the “challenges” posed by China NATO agrees cyberattacks could lead to the invocation of mutual self-defense clause During the summit, US President called for NATO members to stand up to autocrats and “phony populism About NATO summits NATO summits are not regular meetings like the more frequent NATO ministerial meetings, but rather are important junctures in the alliance’s decision-making process on the highest level. Summits are often used to introduce new policy, invite new members into the alliance, launch major new initiatives, and build partnerships with non-NATO countries. From the founding of NATO in 1949, there have been a total of 31 NATO summits. Only the traditional summits have received an official number, thereby excluding the exceptional summit of 2001 in NATO headquarters. Previously, the summit held in Watford (U.K)in December 2019 About NATO NATO is an intergovernmental military alliance between 30 North American and European countries. The organization implements the North Atlantic Treaty that was signed on 4 April 1949 NATO’s purpose is to guarantee the freedom and securityof its members through political and military means. POLITICAL – NATO promotes democratic values. MILITARY – NATO is committed to the peaceful resolution of disputes. If diplomatic efforts fail, it has the military power to undertake crisis-management operations.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018
    NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018 A stronger and more agile Alliance The Brussels Summit comes at a crucial moment for the security of the North Atlantic Alliance. It will be an important opportunity to chart NATO’s path for the years ahead. In a changing world, NATO is adapting to be a more agile, responsive and innovative Alliance, while defending all of its members against any threat. NATO remains committed to fulfilling its three core tasks: collective defence, crisis management and cooperative security. At the Brussels Summit, the Alliance will make important decisions to further boost security in and around Europe, including through strengthened deterrence and defence, projecting stability and fighting terrorism, enhancing its partnership with the European Union, modernising the Alliance and achieving fairer burden-sharing. This Summit will be held in the new NATO Headquarters, a modern and sustainable home for a forward-looking Alliance. It will be the third meeting of Allied Heads of State and Government chaired by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. + Summit meetings + Member countries + Partners + NATO Secretary General Archived material – Information valid up to 10 July 2018 1 NATO Summit Guide, Brussels 2018 I. Strengthening deterrence and defence NATO’s primary purpose is to protect its almost one billion citizens and to preserve peace and freedom. NATO must also be vigilant against a wide range of new threats, be they in the form of computer code, disinformation or foreign fighters. The Alliance has taken important steps to strengthen its collective defence and deterrence, so that it can respond to threats from any direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain Will Organize the Annual NATO Summit in 2022
    Beat: Politics Spain will organize the annual NATO Summit in 2022 When reach 40 years of their accession Madrid, 15.06.2021, 10:51 Time USPA NEWS - Spain will organize the annual NATO Summit in 2022, as agreed on Monday by the Heads of State and Government of the Alliance member countries meeting in Brussels. It was the only concession to Spain, a country that feels ignored by the United States due to erratic politics, focused on the short term and subordinate to the personal interests of the President of the Spanish Government, the socialist Pedro Sánchez. The president is the main responsible for the continuous and progressive loss of support suffered by the Spanish socialists. It will be the second time that Spain hosts the annual NATO Summit. The first was in 1997 and in it, the allies "were able to demonstrate cohesion but, above all, a vision of the future to face the new strategic scenario that was opening up after the fall of the Berlin Wall," explained Pedro Sánchez. "I would like to bring that spirit of Madrid to the next Summit so that we are able to illuminate a new Strategic Concept that will serve as a guide for the years to come," added the President of the Spanish Government. The celebration of the NATO Summit in Madrid next year will coincide with the 40th anniversary of Spain's accession to the Atlantic Alliance. Spain's commitment to NATO is manifested in the fact that this country participates in most of the organization's missions, and it does so with 902 troops.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO and Cyber Security: Critical Junctures As Catalysts for Change
    NATO and Cyber Security: Critical Junctures as Catalysts for Change MA International Relations Candidate: Roger André Tosbotn Student number: s1707752 Email: [email protected] Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Eugenio Cusumano Word count: 11371 Abstract This thesis does two main things. It contributes to the academic debate on the relative prominence of the cyber domain in security, and analyses the change in NATO’s conceptualization of “cyber” over time. These pertinent questions are addressed through quantitative and qualitative analyses. The review of existing scholarship on the topic provides insight into NATO’s strategic development, major cyber-security incidents, the issues relating to Article 5 of the NATO treaty and cyber security, and the effects on the security environment that stems from technological developments in society. By employing the approach of constructivism, the framework of strategic culture, and methods of content analysis, this thesis tracks the change in prominence and conceptualization in official NATO documents from 2002- 2016. As a result, this thesis contributes to an understanding of digital-age security from the point of view of NATO. Finally, it suggests that an awareness of one’s own strategic culture can aid in preparing for new challenges in a security-oriented environment. Keywords: International Security, Cyber Security, NATO, Constructivism, Content Analysis, Strategic Culture, Article 5, CCDCoE. Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks Following Discussions with Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar Of
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 1997 / July 7 1031 to me, in no uncertain terms, that we've got NOTE: The President spoke at 6:43 p.m. at the a sales job to do, but we think we can do Miguel Angel Hotel. it. Q. Mr. President, the Russians have said that if former Soviet Republics are going to be admitted to NATO, they will have to reex- amine their relationship with the alliance, a Remarks Following Discussions With clear message that they would oppose the Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar of Baltic States being new members. Will this Spain and an Exchange With summit, do you believe, send a clear message Reporters in Madrid that when we say the door is open, it also July 7, 1997 includes Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia? Prime Minister Aznar. President Clinton The President. My position is that no Eu- and his family, at the invitation of Their Maj- ropean democracy should be excluded from esty, the King and Queen of Spain, have ultimate consideration. And I have said spent a few days in Mallorca. I hope they thatÐI believe my personal position is that have been good days in Mallorca, a mini-holi- should apply to Russia as well, that any day. I had the opportunity to join them yes- democratic country in Europe prepared to terday, again at the invitation of His Majesty, make NATO's commitments, which includes the King. I think I was meant to torture recognizing the territorial integrity of every President Clinton's holiday for a few mo- other democracy in Europe and every mem- ments, and we discussed at length a number ber of NATO and recognizing our mutual re- of issues.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Guide Warsaw, 8-9 July 2016
    NATO Summit Guide Warsaw, 8-9 July 2016 An essential Alliance in a more dangerous world The Warsaw Summit comes at a defining moment for the security of the North Atlantic Alliance. In recent years, the world has become more volatile and dangerous with Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and destabilisation of eastern Ukraine, as well as its military build-up from the Barents Sea to the Baltic, and from the Black Sea to the eastern Mediterranean; turmoil across the Middle East and North Africa, fuelling the biggest migrant and refugee crisis in Europe since World War Two; brutal attacks by ISIL and other terrorist groups, as well as cyber attacks, nuclear proliferation and ballistic missile threats. NATO is adapting to this changed security environment. It also remains committed to fulfilling its three core tasks: collective defence, crisis management and cooperative security. And, in the Polish capital, the Alliance will make important decisions to boost security in and around Europe, based on two key pillars: protecting its citizens through modern deterrence and defence, and projecting stability beyond its borders. NATO member states form a unique community of values, committed to the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. In today’s dangerous world, transatlantic cooperation is needed more than ever. NATO embodies that cooperation, bringing to bear the strength and unity of North America and Europe. This Summit is the first to be hosted in Poland and the first to be chaired by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who took up his post in October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Summit Brussels 2021 Media Handbook
    NATO SUMMIT BRUSSELS 2021 MEDIA HANDBOOK 1 Contents ADDRESSES AND CONTACT DETAILS ............................................................................................. 2 Key Websites and Social Media Accounts ......................................................................................... 2 COVID-19 MEASURES ............................................................................................................................ 3 TRANSPORTATION & PARKING .......................................................................................................... 4 MEDIA ACCREDITATION........................................................................................................................ 4 FACILITIES .................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. MEDIA CENTRE .................................................................................................................................... 5 WIFI / INTERNET ........................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. MEDIA COVERAGE .................................................................................................................................. 6 MEDIA ACCESS TO SUMMIT EVENTS / POOLS ........................................................................... 6 BROADCAST .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]