Project Scope Summary October 2, 2014

MACOMB COUNTY- CENTRAl CAMPUS RENOVATIONS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAl (RFP)- CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROJECT SCOPE SUMMARY OCTOBER 2, 2014

Macomb County is the third most populous county in the State with a population of 840,978 residents according to the 2010 census with the expectation of continued population growth. This growth has and will continue to place a greater demand for county services which, in effect, require greater demand within the county departments.

Due to the increased demand from the growing population, changes in technology, and the way the county departments function today very differently than in years past, many of Macomb County's departments are not located and/or sized efficiently. Furthermore, the recent fire in the Old County Building has displaced multiple departments, accelerating the need for updated, efficient, and permanent county department locations.

In June 2013, Macomb County engaged Plante Moran Cresa {"PMC") to lead and facilitate development of a conceptual long-term County offices space program and to conduct a "high level" assessment of several existing County facilities. The purpose was to provide Macomb County preliminary data to begin making strategic decisions regarding the future of its departments' office spaces and locations. Please refer to the "Macomb County Central Campus Long Term Space Program/Facility Assessment" by Plante Moran Cresa, Dated October 30, 2013- "The Study" {Section 1.1 of the RFP) for background on the Project and for RFP reference.

The Project will consist of:

This project allows for the interior renovation of five {5) County buildings, the demolition/removal of an existing 600 stall parking structure and the redevelopment of the site into a recreational space, and the construction of new 600 stall parking lot/deck. Project has been broken out into two separate design packages referred to as: Project One and Project Two- described below:

Project One (Architect: Wakely Associates)

Administration Building The project will include the interior renovation of six {6) floors.

Old County Building The project will include the interior renovation ofthirteen {13) floors.

16th Circuit Court Building The project will include the interior renovation ofthree {3) floors

Project Two (Architect: Partners in Architecture)

Talmer Building The project will include the interior renovation of two {2) floors.

Clemens Center The project will include the interior renovation of approximately 12,000 sq. ft.

plante moran CRESA ~ RCAO. £5:lA.T;: CONS:ULT,l,NTS MACOMB COUNTY- CENTRAl CAMPUS RENOVATIONS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAl (RFP}- CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROJECT SCOPE SUMMARY OCTOBER 2, 2014

Existing Parking Structure (31 Market Street) I Redevelopment of Site (Attachment I) The project will include the demolition and removal of the existing 600 space structure and the redevelopment of the site into a recreational themed space.

Proposed Parking Structure at the Administration Building (Attachment I) The project will include the construction of a 600 stall parking lot/deck which is proposed to be 1 Yz stories in the location of the existing Administration Building Parking lot.

Project Specifics: .. Phased Renovation and New Construction .. Two (2) separate design projects .. $35 Million Construction .. 22 Month Construction Duration .. Spring 2015 Start Date

Preliminary Schedule

The schedule descriptions found in Section 2.2 of this RFP are intended to give a general overview of the program being considered by MC. Once engaged, the CM firm will consult with MC, PMC, the AE's and the Owner's other Vendors to confirm and refine the phasing and bid packaging for the different Projects. Once determined, a formal schedule will be drafted.

Accordingly, we are requesting an estimate for Personnel Costs for projects of this nature with the understanding that as the phasing and packaging is further defined these costs will be refined and established as not-to-exceed amounts.

Clarifications to Scope of Project

Provide full construction management services for the following components of the Project, the scope of the included portions of the Project are defined herein:

1. Project is separated into two (2) separate design packages prepared by two separate A/E firms. Construction Manager is to propose on each design package separately with the intent that both projects will be awarded to one contractor.

2. Sitework may be necessary to accommodate the proposed parking structure located adjacent to the Administration Building.

3. Phasing plans are to be fully detailed and designed to maintain operations. Exact number of construction phases to be determined in conjunction with the Architect{s). Please reference "The Study" (Attachment H) for assistance in determining the proposed locations of each Department.

4. It is anticipated that a minimum ofthree (3) bid packages will be prepared for this Project- Bid Package One will consist of Project One interior work by Wakely Associates, Bid Package Two will consist of all interior work by Partners in Architecture, and Bid Pack Three will consist of all exterior work (parking deck removal/site renewal and parking deck construction) by Partners in Architecture. 2 plante moran CRESA ~ R<=AO. ~:!iT1

Project Estimate

The estimated cost for the project is:

Direct Construction Estimate $ 35,000,000.00 FF&E $ 4,000,000.00 Administrative Costs, Professional Fees $ 11,000,000.00 and Project/Design Contingency Total Cost $ 50,000,000.00

3 plante moran CRESA ~ R2Al £STATE CONSULTANTS: MACOMB COUNTY PURCHASING BID TABULATIONS Date: 10/23/2014 Bid Item: 69-14 Dept: F&O Time: 2:00p.m. Name: Construction Management Services The Chnstman Clark construction BIDDER'S NAME - Company Co. Auch Construction Barton Malow 38701 7 Mile Rd. 3535 MooresRiverDr 735 S. Paddock 26500 American Dr Bidder's Address Livonia Ml48152 Lansing Ml 48911 Pontiac Ml 48341 Southfield Ml 48034

Macomb County Vendor NO NO NO NO

DESCRIPTION t Pre-Construction Services hourly basis-not to exceed $ 90,976.00 $ 101,766.00 $ 148,960.00 $ 66,979.00

Construction Services Estimate for Personnel Cost $ 1,595,514.00 $ 1,174,842.00 $ 1,141,260.00 $ 1,339,215.00 Estimate for Construction Support Services $ 506,855.00 $ 679,335.00 $ 541,450.00 $ 649,400.00 Construction Manager's Overhead & Profit(Fee) % 2.3% 1.75% 1.85% 2%

Total CM Core Costs (based on $35,000,000 construction) $ 2,998,345.00 $ 2,586,443.00 $ 2,474,170.00 $ 2,755,594.00 Total estimated construction services as % of construction cost 8.57% 7.34% 7.08% 7.87% total staff hours 21,380.50 21,766.00 16,144.00 20,144.00

note Clark Construction included a value for sub bonds of $321,000. To be consistent with all bidders, that value has been removed from their construction support services fee. Macomb County Macomb County Construction Manager Comparison Analysis Central Campus Renovations FINAL RANKINGS 11-3-14

·· .. Weight · George Audl . Category Sarton M~low .. · Christman Dlmpany Contact JamesMundliando Chad R1ehl MichaeiStobak Ronald D. Staley, FAPT E-Mail [email protected] criehl(fi!clarkcccom mike sloba"@bartonmalow com ronaldstaley@christmancocom Phone: 248-334-2000 517.3720940

100% ?reconstruction Cost 96,371 143,960 101,766 66,979 90,976

100% CM Staff Cost 1,257,029 1,141,260 1.174,842 1,339,215 1,595,514 ·.· CM General Condition 100% 595,425 541,450 679,335 649,400 506,855 Co>t 100% CM Fee(%) 1.93% 1.85% 1.75% 2.00% 2.30% 100% CM Fee {on $35M) 673,750 647,500 612,500 700,000 805,000

100% Total CM Core Costs 2,662,019 2,474,17 2,568,44 2,755,59 2,998,345

Ranking on Core Costs 1 ~ 4 •. 57%

100% Precon Svcs Hours 1,386 1,644.0 1,570.0 1,125.0 1,202.0 100% Construction Hours 19,599 14,500.0 20,196.0 19,019.0 20,178.5 100% Total Staff Hours 20,762 16,l44.0 21,766.0 20,144.0 21,380.5

Office Location Pontiac,MI Lansing,MI Southfield, M! Livonia, Ml

Business Information

Business Classification Large Business Large Business Large Business Large Business Business Organization Licensing Information Provided Provided Provided Provided

Check 60.0 60.0 75.0 75.0

Relevant Project lS.O% Experience! 3.75% 15 18.75 18.75 Relevant Project 25 0 3.75% 15 18.75 18.75 ' % Experience 2 15 15% .0% Relevant Project 25 3.75% 11.25 1S.75 18.75 Experlence3 Relevant Project 25 0 3.75% 18.75 11.25 18.75 ; ..75 · % Experience 4 lOO% :;;::~Concept Check 35.0 40.0 25.0 50.0 .... ···. 75.0%WorkPian 7.5% 22.5 30 225 37,5 10% 25.0% Schedule 2.5% 12.5 1<> 2.5 .12.5- 100% Firm Resource Check 25.0 25,0 25.0 25.0 15% Project Managers 0.8% 3.75 :3.75 3.75 3J'S 10% Project Engineers 0.5% 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

50% On-Site Superintendents 5% 2.5% 22.5 225 22.5 12.5

% Estimato~/Pre 25 1.3% 6.25 6.25 £.25 Constructlon

100% Internal Staff Resource Check 64.5 64.5 64.5 60.0

5% Project Executive 0.8% a.75 3.75••• 3,75 30% Project Manager 4.5% 22.5 22.5 22.5 30% Superintendent 4.5% 22.5 ~2.5 22.5 15% 5% Engineer 0.8% 1.25 2.25 225 20% Preconstruction 3.0% 7.5 1.5 7.5 10% Staff Worked Together 1.5% 2013State " 100% 10% 10.0% 20 EMR Rating 100% Bonding Capacity Check 25.0 25.0 .. 25.0 2:5.0 40% Aggregate 2.0% 20 20 10 10 5% 60% Single Project 3.0% 15 15 15 15 100% Support Services Fees 10% 10.0% 50 20

100% Proposed Fees and Costs 20% 20.0% 200

100% Claims/Suits 5% 5.0% 20 25 20 25 100% Exceptions to Contract 5% 5.0% 25 25 20 Total Weight 100% 100.0% Number of Firms Highest Possible Score 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0

Total Scores 364.5 ·..•. 424.5 434.5 (Quantitative} 350.0 ./ Rank Prior to z ... 4 .·· .•... Interviews 1 ' ...... ·.· .. . ····· Quantitative Score above (with a weighted factor of 85%) will be combined with the Interview Score below (with a weighed factor of 15%).

c I c •••• 1:. ····.·· ····.· Total (Quantitative) 424.5/100, 4.245 434.5/100 =4.345 364.5/100,3.645 35o11oo , 3.5o I·· .···. score /100 ..

Quantitative Score =85% of total score 4.245x85=360.83 4.345X 85 = 369.33 3.645 X85 = 309.83 3.50 X 85 = 297.50 I .... I Interview Score 4 ·... =15% of interview Interview Score Total 3x15=45 4x15=60 5x15=75 5x15=75 score ••• 360.83+45 = 369.33+60= 309.83+ 75 = 297.50 +75 = Final quantitative score+ •··. Combined Score interview score 405.83 429.33 384.83 372.50 . FINAL 2 .... 1 3 4 •. RANKING ·•. •· GeorgeAudr . . •• ••· &aiton Malow

Date=11/512014 Revised 08/0212010 AliRights.Res.erved File Name=Macomb County CM Evaluation Summary.xlsxSconng (2) lntellectllaiPropertyofPianteMoranCresa MACOMB COUNTY CENTRAL CAMPUS RENOVATION - CONSTRUCllON MANAGER CRITERIA SELECllON PROCESS Clark Construction The following is Plante Moran Cresa's recommendations relating to the construction manager selection criteria and weighted factors for the Macomb County Central Campus Project. Information from each firm's proposal will be reviewed and scored according to the criteria definitions as listed below each project type for reference. Firms must meet minimal qualifications established. Interviews will be conducted with the three (3) firms with the highest score for each project type. Once interviews are completed, the Quantitative Score (with a weighted factor of 85%) will be combined with the Interview Score (with a weighed factor of 1 5%). The firm with the highest score will be recommended for award for that particular project type.

CONSTRUCllON MANAGER CRITERIA

0 =No Info 1 =Least 5 total points 5 =Best available CENTRAL CAMPUS RENOVATIONS SCORE FROM WEIGHT WEIGHTED CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CRITERIA EVALUATION FACTOR SCORE

~------4------~------,-s-:oo ______T ______6o~o6------: Relevant Project Experience !------4------r------,-o:o0------r------40.-06______Proposed Concept Approach (Work Plan) 1 r------.,------r------s--:o0------r------2-5-~o6______Firm Resource I Experience 1 r------4~3------r------,-s:cio------r------64_-5_6______1 Internal Staff Resource/Experience !------4------r------,-o:oo ______T ______40.-06______1 2013 EMR Rating (State) Bonding Capacity (Aggregate and Single Project) c::::::::::::::~::::::::::::=::[:::::::::::n~Q::::::::::::r::::::::::::?:~:~~g::::::::::] Support Services Fees : 5 : 1 0.00 : 50.00 : Proposed Fees and Costs i::::::::::::::::~::=:::::::=::t:::::::::=:~Q:9J[::=:::::::t::::::::::[~~g:g::::::::::::1 Claims I Suits i 5 i 5.00 i 25.00 i !------5------r------s-:o0------r------z-s-~6_6______1 Exceptions to Contract TOTAL 100.00 434.50

Quantita~ive Score I 4.345 85.00 369.33 lnterv1ew Score_ 4 15.00 60.00 TotaiScore~------~------~----~10~0~.~0~0~--~~----4~2~9~.~3~3-----4 ~======~======db======~

Plante Moran Cresa will review each CM firm proposal in relation to the scoring listed below. The scoring is to provide guidelines during the proposal review process and PMC will use its professional judgment and industry expertise for applying the score for each firm.

Notes I Clarifications for Project One based on the RFP responses received: Relevant Project Experience rank is based on the minimum of three (3) completed and similar firm projects within the last 1 0 years with a construction value as follows; >$40,000,000 = 5 pts.; > $30,000,000 = 4pts; > $20,000,000 = 3 pts.; > $10,000,000 = 2 pts.; > $5,000,000 = 1 pt.

Proposed Concept and Description (Work Plan) rank is based on the best approach to provide the least impact for operations and promote safety : 5 points - best approach; 4 points = better approach; 3 points = acceptable approach; 1 point= no defined approach

Proposed Firm Resources is based the firm having the capacity to meet the project schedule in comparison with the percentage of work in process in relation to available staff: >60% availability= 5 pts.; >50% availability= 4pts; >40% capacity= 3 pts.; >30% capacity= 2 pt; >20% capacity= 1 pt.

Internal Staff Resource Experience is based on the proposed key staff averageing __ years experience: 20 or more years = 3 pts.; 15 or more years = 2pts; 10 or more years= 1 pt.;+ number of projects proposed staff has worked together on=> 4 = 2 pts; < 4 = l pt.

Experience Modification Rating (EMR) is based on the insurance safety rating the firm as indicated by its insurance carrier: <0.6 EMR = 5 pts.; <0.7 EMR = 4 pts.; <0.8 EMR= 3 pts.; <0.9 EMR = 2 pts.; <1.0 EMR = 1 pt.;> 1.0 EMR = 0 pt. EMR = .7

Bonding Capacity (Aggregate and Single Project) is based on the following: Aggregate >$200M= 3 points;= or> 1OOM= 2 points;= or >$50M = 1 point; Single Project >$50M = 2 points;= or >$35M 1 points;= or >$25M= 0 point; (5 points max total)

Proposed support services and precon as based on the following: =or <3.6% or less= 5 pts.; =or <4.0% = 4 pts.; =or <4.5% = 3 pts.; =or <5.0% = 2 pts.; =or <5.50% = 1 pt.;= or <6.0% = 0 pt. $I ,276,608 or 3.6%

Total Proposed Fees and Costs: will be ranked with the lowest Total receiving 5 points and setting the curve

Claims 1 Suits are based on the tollowing: It answered no to all ~ questions in Qulitication packet= 5 pts.; It there are only judgements or claims against firm= 4 pts.; If firm has only been party to a construction lawsuit= 3 pts.; If firm has both judgements/claims against and party to a lawsuit = 2 pts.; If firm has only defaulted on a Contract= 1 pt.; If all three selected = 0 pts.

Exceptions to the Contract is based on the following: No Exceptions= 5 pts.; All other exceptions will be graded on the severity of the exception(s) taken.

Interviews are conducted by the Selection Committee (comprised of PMC and MC representatives) with relation to the proposal review, team presentation, and individual presentation. Interviews are ranked based on the following: 5 points -best interview; 3 points= better interview; 1 point= good interview. MACOMB COUNTY CENTRAL CAMPUS RENOVATION -CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CRITERIA SELECTION PROCESS Auch The following is Plante Moran Cresa's recommendations relating to the construction manager selection criteria and weighted factors for the Macomb County Central Campus Project. Information from each firm's proposal will be reviewed and scored according to the criteria definitions as listed below each project type for reference. Firms must meet minimal qualifications established. Interviews will be conducted with the three (3) firms with the highest score for each project type. Once interviews are completed, the Quantitative Score (with a weighted factor of 85%) will be combined with the Interview Score (with a weighed factor of l 5%). The firm with the highest score will be recommended for award for that particular project type.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CRITERIA

0 =No Info 1 =Least 5 total points 5 =Best available CENTRAL CAMPUS RENOVATIONS SCORE FROM WEIGHT WEIGHTED CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CRITERIA EVALUATION FACTOR SCORE

Relevant Project Experience ~------4------T·------··rs~aa·------r·------6o:aa·------l Proposed Concept Approach (Work Plan) r------3~-5------r------1o~oo·------r------3s:oo·------1 Firm Resource I Experience r------s·------r------s~aa·------r------;;s-:aa·------1 Internal Staff Resource/Experience r·------3·------r·------·ya:aa·------r·------3o:ao·------1r------4~3------r------Ts:aa·------r------64:sa·------1 2013 EMR Rating (State) r------s·------T------·-s:ao·------r------zs:oo·------1 Bonding Capacity (Aggregate and Single Project) r------4 ______T ______To:oo------r·------4o:oo ______1 Support Services Fees Proposed Fees and Costs r------s·------T------·z:a:oo------r·------yo-o:oo·------1 ~------4·------T·------·-s:oo ______T______zo:oo·------1 Claims I Suits Exceptions to Contract r·------s·------T·------·-s-:oo·------T------z:s:oo·------1 TOTAL 100.00 424.50

Quantita~ive Score I 4.245 85.00 360.83 Interview Score_ 3 15.00 45.00 Tota1Scoret:::::::~::::::jt::::J1~0~oj.o~o~::::j::::::4~0~5~.8~3~::::j

Notes I Clarifications for Project One based on the RFP responses received: Relevant Project Experience rank is based on the minimum of four (4) completed projects within the last 10 years that have a construction value of at least $40,000,000. Each project is seperately ranked on: similarity to campus renovation project, size, complexity and cost.

Proposed Concept and Description (Work Plan) rank is based on the best approach to provide the least impact for operations and promote safety: 5 points- best approach; 4 points= better approach; 3 points =acceptable approach; 1 point= no defined approach

Internal Staff Resource Experience is based on the proposed key staff averageing __ years experience: 20 or more years= 3 pts.;1 5 or more years = 2pts; 10 or more years= 1 pt.;+ number of projects proposed staff has worked together on=> 4 = 2 pts; < 4 = 1 pt.

Experience Modification Rating (EMR) is based on the insurance safety rating the firm as indicated by its insurance carrier: <0.6 EMR = 5 pts.; <0. 7 EMR = 4 pts.; <0.8 EMR= 3 pts.; <0.9 EMR = 2 pts.; <1.0 EMR = l pt.; > 1.0 EMR = 0 pt.

Bonding Capacity (Aggregate and Single Project) is based on the following: Aggregate >$200M= 3 points;= or> lOOM= 2 points;= or >$50M = 1 point; Single Project >$50M = 3 points; or >$35M2 points;= or >$25M= 1 point; (5 points max total)

Proposed support services and precon as based on the following: =or <3.6% or less= 5 pts.; =or <4.0% = 4 pts.; =or <4.5% = 3 pts.; =or <5.0% = 2pts.; or

Total Proposed Fees and Costs: will be ranked with the lowest Total receiving 5 points and setting the curve ua1ms 1 ~wts are based on the to11ow1ng: It answered no to all 3 questions 1n ~ulltlcatlon packet=~ pts.; It there are only JUdgements or c1a1ms against firm= 4 pts.; If firm has only been party to a construction lawsuit= 3 pts.; If firm has both judgements/claims against and party to a lawsuit= 2 pts.; If firm has only defaulted on a Contract= 1 pt.; If all three selected 0 pts.

Exceptions to the Contract is based on the following: No Exceptions= 5 pts.; All other exceptions will be graded on the severity of the exception(s) taken.

The following is Moran Cresa's recommendations relating to the construction manager selection criteria and weighted factors for the Macomb County Central Campus Project. Information from each firm's proposal will be reviewed and scored according to the criteria definitions as listed below each project type for reference. Firms must meet minimal qualifications established. Interviews will be conducted with the four (4) firms with the highest score. Once interviews are completed, the Quantitative Score (with a weighted factor of 85%) will be combined with the Interview Score (with a weighed factor of 1 5%). The firm with the highest score will be recommended for award for that particular project type.

CONSTRUcnON MANAGER CRITERIA

O=Nolnfo 1 =least 5 total points 5 =Best available CENTRAL CAMPUS RENOVATIONS SCORE FROM WEIGHT WEIGHTED CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CRITERIA EVALUATION FACTOR SCORE r------s------T------ys-:oo ______T ______-y;;-_-6_6______: Relevant Project Experience Proposed Concept Approach (Work Plan) ~------r-s------r------yo:

Quantita~ive Score I 3.645 85.00 309.83 IntervieW Score_ 5 15.00 75.00 TotaiScore~------~------~-----710~0~.~0~0~--~------3~8~47.~8~3----~ ~======±====~~====d===~~~==~

Notes I Clarifications for Project One based on the RFP responses received: Relevant Project Experience rank is based on the minimum of three (3) completed and similar firm projects within the last 10 years with a construction value as follows; >$40,000,000 = 5 pts.; > $30,000,000 = 4pts; > $20,000,000 = 3 pts.; > $10,000,000 = 2 pts.; > $5,000,000 = 1 pt.

Internal Staff Resource Experience is based on the proposed key staff averageing __ years experience: 20 or more years= 3 pts.;15 or more years= 2pts; 10 or more years= 1 pt.; +number of projects proposed staff has worked together on=> 4 = 2 pts; < 4 = 1 pt.

Proposed support services and precon as based on the following: =or <3.6% or less= 5 pts.; =or <4.0% = 4 pts.; =or <4.5% = 3 pts.; =or <5.0% = 2 pts.; =or <5.50% = 1 pt.;= or <6.0% = 0 pt. = $1,406, I 94 or 4.0%

Total Proposed Fees and Costs: will be ranked with the lowest Total receiving 5 points and setting the curve

Claims 1 Suits are based on the tollowing: It answered no to all 3 questions in Qulitication packet= 5 pts.; It there are only judgements or claims against firm = 4 pts.; If firm has only been party to a construction lawsuit= 3 pts.; If firm has both judgements/claims against and party to a lawsuit = 2 pts.; If firm has only defaulted on a Contract= 1 pt.; If all three selected= 0 pts.

Exceptions to the Contract is based on the following: No Exceptions= 5 pts.; All other exceptions will be graded on the severity of the exception(s) taken.

Interviews are conducted by the Selection Committee (comprised of PMC and MC representatives) with relation to the proposal review, team presentation, and individual presentation. Interviews are ranked based on the following: 5 points - best interview; 3 points = better interview; 1 point= good interview. MACOMB COUNTY CENTRAL CAMPUS RENOVATION- CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CRITERIA SELECTION PROCESS Christman The following is Plante Moran Cresa's recommendations relating to the construction manager selection criteria and weighted factors for the Macomb County Central Campus Project. Information from each firm's proposal will be reviewed and scored according to the criteria definitions as listed below each project type for reference. Firms must meet minimal qualifications established. Interviews will be conducted with the three (3) firms with the highest score for each project type. Once interviews are completed, the Quantitative Score (with a weighted factor of 85%) will be combined with the Interview Score (with a weighed factor of 1 5%). The firm with the highest score will be recommended for award for that particular project type.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CRITERIA

O=Nolnfo 1 = Least 5 total points 5 =Best available CENTRAL CAMPUS RENOVATIONS SCORE FROM WEIGHT WEIGHTED CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CRITERIA EVALUATION FACTOR SCORE

r·------s·------T·------ys:oo ______T ______Ys:oo·------~ Relevant Project Experience r------s·------r·------·-yo:oo·------r------;;o:oo·------1 Proposed Concept Approach (Work Plan) r------s·------r·------s:oo·------r------2s:oo·------1 Firm Resource I Experience r·------4·------r·------1s:oo·------r·------6o:oo··------1 Internal Staff Resource/Experience r·------3·------r·------·yo:oo·------r·------3o:oo·------1 2013 EMR Rating (State) r·------s·------r·------s:oo·------r·------2s:oo ______1 Bonding Capacity (Aggregate and Single Project) r·------2·------T·------yo:oo ______T ______2o:oo·------1 Support Services Fees r·------T ______T ______2o:oo ______T ______2o:oo·------1 Proposed Fees and Costs Claims I Suits r------s·------T·------s:aa·------r·------B:oo·------1 Exceptions to Contract r------4·------T·------s:oo·------r·------2o:oo·------1 TOTAL 100.00 350.00

Quantita~ive Score I 3.5 85.00 297.50 lnterv1ew Score. 5 15.00 75.00 TotaiScore~------~------+-----~1~0~0~.0~0~----+-----~3~7~2~.5~0~--~ ~======~====~~==~====~~==~

Proposed Concept and Description (Work Plan) rank is based on the best approach to provide the least impact for operations and promote safety: 5 points- best approach; 4 points better approach; 3 points= acceptable approach; 1 point= no defined approach

Proposed Firm Resources is based the firm having the capacity to meet the project schedule in comparison with the percentage of work in process in relation to available staff: >60% availability 5 pts.; >50% availability= 4pts; >40% capacity= 3 pts.; >30% capacity= 2 pt; >20% capacity= 1 pt.

Internal Staff Resource Experience is based on the proposed key staff averageing __ years experience: 20 or more years= 3 pts.;15 or more years = 2pts; 10 or more years= 1 pt.; + number of projects proposed staff has worked together on=> 4 = 2 pts; < 4 = 1 pt.

Bonding Capacity (Aggregate and Single Project) is based on the following: Aggregate >$200M= 3 points;= or> 1OOM= 2 points;= or >$50M point; Single Project >$50M = 3 points;= or >$35M2 points; or >$25M 1 point; (5 points max total)

Proposed support services and precon as based on the following: or <3.6% or less= 5 pts.; =or <4.0% = 4 pts.; =or <4.5% = 3 pts.; =or <5.0% = 2 pts.; =or <5.50% = 1 pt.;= or <6.0% = 0 pt.= $7,686,490 or4.8%

Total Proposed Fees and Costs: will be ranked with the lowest Total receiving 5 points and setting the curve

Ua1ms 1 ~u1ts are based on tne tollowmg: It answered no to all j questions 1n l)_ullt1cat1on packet='> pts.; It tnere are only JUdgements or c1a1ms against firm= 4 pts.; If firm has only been party to a construction lawsuit= 3 pts.; If firm has both judgements/claims against and party to a lawsuit= 2 pts.; If firm has only defaulted on a Contract 1 pt.; If all three selected= 0 pts.

Exceptions to the Contract is based on the following: No Exceptions= 5 pts.; All other exceptions will be graded on the severity of the exception(s) taken.

November 5, 2014

Mr. Mark Hackel Macomb County Executive Macomb County Office of County Executive 1 One South Main- 8 h Floor Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043

RE: Recommendation for CM Services for Central Campus Renovations

Dear Mr. Hackel,

This letter transmits an update from Plante Moran Cresa (PM C) as it relates to the assignment to assist and advise Macomb County (MC) in its selection of Construction Manager (CM) for the Central Campus Redevelopment (Project). This update represents the mutual efforts of PMC and the MC Administration to present a framework in order to identify, evaluate, and recommend the CM for the Project.

PMC was engaged by MC and it was indicated that a Criteria Based Selection (CBS) process would be conducted to provide information relating to the firm's history and experience in the public sector; recent and relevant phased renovation experience- especially as it pertained to municipal projects. PMC would also obtain information relating to the expertise of proposed staff, EMR (safety) rating, and bonding capacity. This framework is to provide an order of importance to the responding firms' qualifications, in addition to their proposed fees, to allow MC to make an informed decision regarding the hiring of a CM firm for the Project. The criteria and their respective weight factors were presented to MC for review and recommendation(s).

Following Me's Purchasing Department protocol, Request for Proposals (RFP) were submitted to the MITN website on Wednesday, October 1, 2014. A discretionary walk-through was conducted on October 9, 2014 with eight (8) firms in attendance to review the requirements for the RFP, inquire about specifics relating to the program and budget, and tour the Parking Structure, the Administration, Old County, and 1 16 h Circuit Court Buildings. On October 23, 2014, four (4) proposals were received and opened publically at Me's Purchasing Department. Responses were reviewed in relation to the qualitative information described above and all four respondents were invited to present their firm's capabilities, proposal clarifications, and fee structure to MC. Interviews were conducted by PMC in conjunction with Me's Purchasing Department (Ms. Polly Helzer), Facility Department (Mr. Alfred Brys), OCE (Mr. Mark Deldin) and BOC (Mr. David Flynn and Mr. Jim Carabelli) (The Selection Team) in the MC Board of Commissioners Conference Room on Thursday, October 30, 2014.

Upon completion of the interviews and subsequent proposal clarifications and discussions, the Selection Team and PMC are recommending an award to Clark Construction as the Construction Management firm for the Central Campus Renovations Project.

26300 Northwestern H ighv,'ay, Southfield,. M I 48076 Tel 248.2233500 Fax 248.223,3150 WW\M,pmcresa.com plante moran CRESA REAL ESTATE CONSULTANTS

This recommendation is supported by Clark Construction achieving the highest CBS score for the proposed Project. This high score was achieved due to their firm experience, team experience, proposed work plan, safety rating, cost, and interview performance.

PMC recommends to the Macomb County Office of County Executive to enter into a professional services Contract with Clark Construction for the Central Campus Renovations Project. The initial engagement will be for Pre-Construction services valued at one hundred and one thousand, seven hundred and sixty six dollars ($101,766). At the establishment ofthe Project Guaranteed Maximum Price, the CM costs will include the following: Personnel cost is not-to-exceed one million, one hundred seventy four thousand, eight hundred and forty two dollars ($1,174,842), Construction Support Services are not-to-exceed one million, three hundred and thirty five dollars ($1,000,335), and Overhead and Profit will be 1.75% ofthe Cost of Work. A finalized contract including these items is anticipated to be presented to the Office of County Executive by November 10, 2014.

PMC is available to answer any questions about the RFP and interview process, the CBS ranking system, and the methodology used to prepare it.

Sincerely,

PLANTE MORAN CRESA

Enclosures: Final CM Criteria Based Selection Score Card Final CM Criteria Based Selection Detailed Criteria Final CM Bid Tabulation Summary

26300 Northwestern Highway, Southfield_, Ml48076 Tel 248,223.3500 Fax 248,2233150 WWVJ,pmcresa.com

f:l~

§gtJ.!hE::?_,_tMichigan Office 1000 Town Center, Suite 2450 Professlnnaf Construct1on Services Southfield. Ml 48075 248.286.1000 phone 1248.286.1010 fax

October 23, 2014

Polly A. Helzer Purchasing Manager' Macomb County Purchasing 44900 Vic Wertz Drive Clinton Township, Ml 48036

Dear Ms. Helzer:

Making Macomb Your Home is

It is our belief that the construction management team best suited for this program must provide certain key elements to achieve project success. What the Clark Team proposes to Macomb County, beyond our formal RFP response, is our commitment to providing:

Experience- Clark has been the construction manager in many similar county and municipal projects throughout Michigan. Our experienced team of dedicated construction professionals will provide the strength and leadership to Macomb County, from preconstruction through construction, occupancy and warranty. We will draw from the vast pool of talented subcontractors making Macomb County home to form a flexible, diverse and cohesive construction team.

Team Strength-The Clark Team is experienced in managing construction and renovation in the municipal arena and in occupied buildings while keeping security, safety, organization and quality in the forefront. The applied experience, knowledge and synergy of our team will be a value-added benefit to the residents, as well as the Macomb County Team Members.

Communication -In order for this program to be successful, a TEAM approach is paramount. We promise employee-focused, innovative solutions, which will be integrated into the pre-design/preconstruction and construction phases of the work. We will maximize the value of your construction dollars, anticipate and communicate program requirements, and execute the work with the largest qualified trade contractor base in the area.

We look forward to presenting our team of professionals to you and the selection committee members. We dedicate to Macomb County and this project the finest resources of Clark Construction Company. We commit outstanding personnel, extensive experience, and customer focused methodologies toward completing this project successfully. It would be our honor to serve the residents and team members in Macomb County in this exciting effort to keep in the ongoing tradition of making "Macomb Your Home."

Sincerely, Clark Construction Company (J ~~~ David A. Reece, AlA Senior Vice President/[email protected]/248.515.7777

Michigan's First 2013 AGC National Platinum Contractor Safety Excellence Award An Equal Opportunity Employer ""U 0 lJ 0 U> 0 -n 0 3

Construction Company Professional Construction Services Proposal Form

BID ITEM 69-14 Construction Management Services fA.;pj.;f>,,Hg:.vi (<:~-,,. <:> ;-,:·-~ PROPOSAL FORM

Clark Construction Company ' Proposes to provide Pre-Construction and Construction Services to f'v1acomb County referred to as for the Construction Project as follows:

1. For Pre-Construction Services, on an hourly basis at the rates stipulated, and not-to-exceed $101 ,766. 2. For Construction Services, at a Cost plus a Fee basis: a. Estimate for Personnel Cost is: $1.174.842 b, Estimate for Construction Support Services is: $1.000.335 c. Construction Manager's Overhead & Profit (Fee) is: 1.75% of the Cost of the Work I understand that the initial engagement is for Pre-Construction Services only. Owner reserves the right to negotiate with the selected CM at the end of the pre-construction phase for subsequent construction services for construction of new facilities and renovation of existing facilities at the Owner's site, or terminate the CM service and solicit proposals from other construction management firms for construction services. I have read and I understand the responsibilities required of the Construction Manager under the Agreement between the Owner and Construction Manager and General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, which are provided with the RFP. If selected, our company will be able to fulfill the requirements.

SIGNATURE

Dated this22nd day of Oct. , 2014.

Company Na,,,\c:,.. ..:.7.. -:::::-·o?O

Title: _____..:.:P..:.:r_e_si_d_e_n_t ______

Samuel Clark being duly sworn, deposes and says that the information provided herein is complete so as not to be misleading.

Subscribed and sworn before me this d.J.rJ day ofGd.>:i:..r, 2014.

Notary Public: --~· ""---'C~·1_'();,~{<.___·::.:::_ ____ LYNf\1 A. DE!

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLAR Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Proposal Form

BID ITEM 69~14 Construction Management Services

PROPOSAL CHECKLIST

[ill Cost Proposal IKJ IF selected as Construction Manager, I agree to the contractual terms as (gJ Summary Page provided in the RFP: [X] Staff Assignment & Hours IX] Project Staff Hours IK] AlA Al33- 2009, As Modified IX] Staff Cost Cash Flow [KJ AlA A201- 2007 General Conditions IX] Construction Support Cost IKJ Preliminary Project Milestones [K] An Electronic Copy IK] Addendum # _1_ dated October 8, 2014 D

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company BID ITEM 69-14 Construction Management Services

County of Macomb, Michigan VENDORD~CLOSUREFORM

The Macomb County ethics ordinance requires vendors of the County to complete and file a disclosure statement, the purpose of which is to disclose any financial relationships or other conflicts of interest that may exist between vendors and employees or elected officials (or their appointees) of the County. Once filed, the disclosure form does not need to be updated unless there is a change in circumstance that would cause the answer to any of the questions to change, at which time an amended disclosure form must be filed. Filing of the disclosure form is considered a condition of payment. PLEASE RETURN THE COMPLETED FORM TO: Macomb County Purchasing Department ATTN: Vendor Disclosure 44900 Vic Wertz Drive Clinton Twp. Ml 48036

VENDOR NAME: Clark Construction Company

1. Does the vendor currently employ a relative of any employee, elected official or appointee of an elected official of Macomb County? Relative is defined as husband or wife, father or mother, son or daughter, brother or sister, uncle or aunt, first cousin, nephew or niece, great uncle or great aunt, grandfather or grandmother, grandson or granddaughter, father-in-law or mother-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-in-law, brother-in-law or sister-in-law, stepfather or stepmother, stepson or stepdaughter, stepbrother or stepsister, half brother or half sister, the parents or grandparents of the individual's fiancee. D YES [KJ NO

If yes, please answer the following:

A Name of County employee or elected official (or appointee): ______

B. County Position/Title:

C. County Department or Agency:

2. Does any employee or elected official of Macomb County have an interest in the vendor organization in any of the following capacities, either compensated or non-compensated: director, officer, partner, beneficiary, trustee, member, employee or contractor.

D YES NO

If yes, please answer the following:

A. Name of County employee or elected official (or appointee):

B. County Position/Title:

C. County Department or Agency:

D. Position/Title with Vendor:

Pape 25 of34 BID ITEM 69-14 Construction Management Services

3. Does any current employee or elected official of Macomb County have legal or beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the outstanding stock of the vendor organization?

D YES [X] NO If yes, please answer the following:

A. Name of County employee or elected official (or appointee): ______

B. County Position/Title:

C. County Department or Agency:

D. % of Ownership of Vendor Organization:

4. In the last five calendar years, has the vendor failed to perform or otherwise deliver on the terms of a contract or agreement with Macomb County, or any other public entity, including suspensions or debarments? D YES [XJ NO If yes, please provide further explanation:

I hereby certify that the information included on this form is complete, true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that either myself or the organization to which this form applies may be subject to sanctions and/or penalties as set forth in the ethics ordinance if any information has been falsified or omitted.

President Title

October 22, 2014 Date

Page 26 of 34 BID ITEM 69d14 Construction Management Services

NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF ) ) ss COUNTY OF )

Samuel Clark , being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he/she is authorized on behalf of Clark Construction Company (Bidder Name) who is making the foregoing proposal(s) that:

1) Such proposals are genuine and not collusive or a sham.

2) This Bidder has not colluded, conspired, connived or agreed, directly or indirectly, with any other Bidder or person to submit a proposal which is a sham.

3) This Bidder has not in any manner agreed with any other persons or businesses to fix the proposed price, overhead, profit, or any cost element of the submitted proposal.

4) This Bidder has not attempted to secure any advantage against any other Bidders through collusion with any other Bidder or employees or representative of the County.

5) That the proposals submitted are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief and are made in good faith.

6) This Bidder has not directly or indirectly submitted or disclosed its proposal or its contents or divulged information or data relative thereto t9 any association or to any member or agent of any other Bidder to this proposaL 1J ~ .--~~

Further, Affiant sayeth not.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this'\)J,~~ day of Octr;>~d , 20B_. LYNN /\. DEKAM NOTARY PUBLIC. S'f'ATE OF MiCHIGAN COUNTY <;JF CLINTON 2016 My Oommlmo\on EXfl~:t Oct. 3• Notary Public Acllng in the Count!/ of_!!~"""~-- Clinton County, Michigan My Commission Expires: Acting in the County of I Clinton

BIDDER: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE COMPLETED, SIGNED, NOTARIZED AND INCLUDED IN YOUR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION.

P;,nP. 27 nf ~A BID ITEM 69-14 Construction Management Services

MACOMB COUNTY BASED PREFERENCE

A local preference percentage credit from the following allowance table will be applied to the bid of any County-based Enterprise. This credit will be subtracted from the bid of the County-based Enterprise. In comparing bids, the bid of the County -based Enterprise after subtraction of the credit shall be considered the official bid. However, if the County-based Enterprise is awarded the Contract, the bid without the equalization percentage credit shall be the Contract price.

Contract Amount Local Preference Percentage

Up to $50,000.00 5

$50,000.00 to $200,000.00 3

$200,000.00 and over 1

1. No business shall receive these credits unless it has been certified by the Purchasing Manager. 2. Any business who claims entitlement to any local preference credit shall disclose the records necessary to establish eligibility to the County. 3. After applying any local preference credits as provided above, the Contract shall be awarded to the lowest Responsible Bidder thus evaluated.

IN ORDER TO DETERMINE IF YOUR BUSINESS IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE A LOCAL PREFERENCE PERCENT AGE CREDIT PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

1. Is your business headquarters physically located within Macomb County, or has it been conducting business at a location with a permanent street address in the County of Macomb on an ongoing basis for not less than one taxable year prior to your bid or response to this Request for Proposal? YES __ NO _X_ 2. Has your business paid property taxes on real or personal property within the past year on property which is ordinarily needed to perform the proposed contract? YES NO X 3. Are at least 50 percent of your regular full-time employees based at the County location to perform the proposed contract? YES NO _X_ 4. Has your business been dealing for at least one year on a regular commercial basis in the kind of goods or services which are the subject of this bid or proposal? YES_X_NO Drug Screening

To the extent not prohibited by law, all contracts for construction, repair, alteration, or rebuilding of a County building or other property shall include a provision requiring the contractor and any subcontractor providing services under the contract to conduct pre-hire screening for illegal drug use by their employees who provide services under the contract.

If applicable, is your business compliant with this requirement? YES _X_ No__

PaQe 28 of 34 BID ITEM 69~14 Construction Management Services

GENERAL INFORMATION

In further description of this Bid, we desire to submit sheets marked as follows:

Bidding under the name of: __C=l=a=r=k'-C=-o=n=s;;;...;t;.;.;..r"""'"u...;...ct.;;.;..i-"-o_n_C~om__,p_a_n_,~.y ______

Federal Employer Identification Number: =3-"-8-'-1=2=7_:::2=3'-=1=2'------

which is (check one of the following):

(X) Corporation, incorporated under the laws of the State of:

Michi an

( ) Partnership, consisting of (list partners):

) Assumed Name (Register No.) --,--~-:::--=----,rL--~-'r------

( ) Individual /( ' /' I /' AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: --r/_"L..;..,-+-1-""'a_,_~'--'='~"'""'~"'---~_-,_~_./_, ______7 ,.j Printed or typed signature: _____S_am_u_e_l_C_la_r_k ______

Title: President

Address: 3535 Moores Rjyer Drive

City, State: Lansing, Michigan

Date: October 23, 2014

Telephone Number: _5_1_7_.3_7_2_.0_9_40______

Fax Number: 517 372 0668

Email: [email protected]

***************************************************************************************************************

When payment on such order or contract is to be directed to the same company at an address different from above, please list the address to be used below:

Pape 29 of34 BID ITEM 69-14 Construction Management Services

WORK REFERENCES

BIDDER'S COMPANY NAME Clark Construction Company Please list at least three (3) companies or public agencies for which you have done similar work.

Macomb County reserves the right to reject low Bids for poor past performance or inadequate references.

NAME OF COMPANY City of Ann Arbor

CONTACT PERSON Matt Kulhanek

ADDRESS 801 Airport Dr, Ann Arbor, MI ·~------TELEPHONE NO. 734.972.9112

NAME OF COMPANY Clinton County ------CONTACT PERSON Ryan Wood

ADDRESS 100 E. State St., Suite 2100, St. Johns, MI

TELEPHONE NO. 989.224.5120

NAME OF COMPANY Ingham County

CONTACT PERSON John Neilsen

ADDRESS P.O.Box 319, Mason, MI

TELEPHONE NO. 517.676.7209

NAME OF COMPANY Washtenaw County

CONTACT PERSON Jason Fee

ADDRESS 110 N. Fourth Ave., Suite 205, Ann Arbor, MI

TELEPHONE NO. 734.260.1449

Paqe 30 of 34 BID ITEM 69-14 Construction Management Services

FEDERAL E-VERIFY PROGRAM

The Macomb County Board of Commissioners has established a policy regarding the Federal E Verify Program. This policy states that future contracts (including both new and reviewing contracts) between Macomb County and contractors and vendors who provide services in excess of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) shall require the contractors and vendors to register with, participate in, and utilize the E-Verify Program (or any successor program implemented by the federal Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration) when hiring their employees and require the County's Human Resources Department to utilize the E-Verify Program (or any successor program implemented by the federal Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration) when hiring new employees.

For more information about E-Verify, go to =.:.:'-""-'-===·=·: Click on the E-Verify icon on the bottom left-hand corner of page.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT Of MACOMB COUNTY'S POLICY REQUIRING PARTICIPATION IN THE FEDERAL E-VERIFY PROGRAM AND CERTIFICATION Of COMPLIANCE

The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the policy of the Macomb County Board of Commissioners requiring contractors, including those providing professional services, who provide services in excess of $20,000 a year to the County to register and participate in the Federal E-Verify Program. The undersigned hereby certifies that (he/she/it) will comply with this policy and will register with, participate in and utilize the E-Verify Program or any successor program implemented by the Federal Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration when hiring employees.

DATED: October 23, 2014 Authorized Signature Chad Riehl Printed or Typed Signature

Clark Construction Company Name of Company

Paqe 31 of34 BID ITEM 69-14 Construction Management Services

CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE -IRAN ECOMOMIC SANCTIONS ACT

Michigan Public Act No. 517 of 2012

The undersigned, the owner or authorized officer of the below-named Bidder - Clark Construction Company , hereby certifies, represents and warrants that the Bidder, including its officers, directors and employees, is not an "Iran linked business" within the meaning of the Iran Economic Sanctions Act, Michigan Public Act No. 517 of 2012 (the "Act"), and that in the event Bidder is awarded a contract, the Bidder will not become an "Iran linked business" at any time during the course of performing any services under the contract.

BIDDER: Clark Construction Cqmpany -~~

By: Samuel Clark

Its: President

Date: October 22, 2014

PaQe 32of34 () 0 ~ ""0 0 lJ 0 (J> 0 PROJEG NUMBER: TBD Proposal Due Date= 23-0ct-14 PROJEG NAME: Macomb County- Central Campus Renovations (UPDATED VERSION)

ESTIMATED CONSTRUGION COST: $ 35,000,000 CONSTRUGION DELIVERY METHOD: CM Construction Monoger os Constructor, with GMP

Preconstruction Construction START DATE: 11/24/14 3/17/15 FINISH DATE: 3/16/15 8/14/17

Months Weeks ~ PROJEG DURATION: Pre-Canst. 4 16 112 Construction 29 126 881

ESTIMATED BUILDING AREA: Sq. Ft.

PRECONSTRUGION SERVICES PRECONSTRUGION SERVICES REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES CONSTRUGION PERSONNEL CONSTRUGION PLANT $ 236,835 $ $ $ 236,835 SERVICES & SAFETY $ 18,500 $ $ $ 18,500 EQUIPMENT/TOOLS $ $ $ $ MISCELLANEOUS $ 21,500 $ $ $ 21,500 PERMITS, INSURANCE & TAXES $ 723,500 $ $ $ 723,500

ITOTAL GENERAL CONDITIONS $ 1,002,835 $ 1,274,108 $ $ 2,276,9431

GENERAL CONDITIONS AS% OF CONSTRUGION COST= 6.51% CONSTRUGION MANAGER'S OVERHEAD & PROFIT(%)= 1.75%

Preconstruction Hours: 1570 Construction Hours: 20196

TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COST= $

File Name = Staff Work Sheet Draft 1.xlsx!Summary Intellectual Property of Run Date= 10/23/14 1 of 8 Plante Moran CRESA, LLC PERONNEL COST WORKSHEET Macomb County- Central C11mpus Renovations (UPDATED VERSION)

2,080

~rlyRalewllh To!rm lil~ WorkerC

'1,2~9 I \947 $ 1 Jd~ $ y.;, $ 5,7B ~12 s 1.15 ' us 45.68:. I l73 I " I 11-19 ' ~ ~-:.J ' 1.15 4000 ~ 205 s ., ; 1.15 5310 G,B4B s 1,6D2 s 1,1.!9 2,872 3W u~ 28.90$ " s 1,149 u:. " ~ '" us 4UO S ~ •. ;.ol l,£SS $ $ 1,149 ; 2,J·J~ ; 4441 :2,4sg LlS 37.50 4,83E- 1,131 " $ 1,149 2d,5~4 ; 1D,l96 1.15 "

~.. ~ ~~

CONSTRUCTION STAFF BwnHaurs{Yeor: 2,080

rlyRalewlth j ot~uM"<· WcrkerComp Pension or401(k):M~dl~:~~~nlol & Holldoyl S/LTDI"ourance Mork-up W-ZAnnu~ISal•rv B~n.,flts'

86.56$ 65.55 s 7254 $ ~ 947 $ $ 1149 $ 3,d~~ 5713 $ 438$ 0.00 " ' 61.61$ ~:-_ $ 11.751 LOO 59,85S l.lfi.i I LOO 0.00 23.75$ ii% $ " s 1149 s 2,366 ; 11.~:3 324 $

33.26 $ 4,15~ s 'F.I 5 l,Hg 1,74~ iW 5 1131 s <.o:a '$ 4200 s 5,2:31 1,"37 " ' 1,14g 2,211 s ~ S60 $ ,, tJ.IM 39,30 •1,90<9 s 1.1 ~-s ' 42 $ 1.149 s 2.-li1 '~trl ; :-

1.00 1.00 s ...... :£~£'•• ..,..,..,....,~;.'J..9S..non.-• .-. i.S...... -·· ...... ~-···-

File Name=Stafl Work Sheet Draft l.xlsx/Staff Rate Wksht Intellectual Property of Date=i0/23/14 2 of 8 Plante ~loran CRESA, LLC PROJECfNUMBER: PROJECT NAME: Macomb County • Central Campus Renovations (UPDATED VERSION) CONSTRUCTIONOEUVERVNIETHOD. Conolruc!lonM•n•~ornConstructor,wllhGMP

SUMMARY OF STAFF HOURS ProjoctMonlh(Ovuoll)

F•leName~StaffWorkSheetDraft1.xlsx/StaffHours !1\tellectuaiPropertyof Date~lD/23/14 3 of 8 PlanteMoranCRESA, LLC PROJECT NUMBER: TBD PROJECT NAME: Macomb County- Central Campus Renovations (UPDATED VERSION)

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 35,000,000 CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHOD: CM Construction Manager as Constructor.. with GMP

Preconstruction Construction START DATE: 11/24/14 3/17/15 FINISH DATE: 3/16/15 8/14/17

Months Weeks ~ PROJECT DURATION: Pre-constr 4 16.00 112 Construction 29 125.86 881

CODE DESCRIPTION Q.TY. UNIT UNIT (£)EQUIP.& (S)SUBc TOTAL NO. .· PRICE MAT'l (t)tABOR CONTRACTOR COST

CONSTRUCTION PLANT

-~~- >-;---·-· E PROJECT OFFICE 1 30.0 M"(J"""~ $ 1,000.00 $ 30,000 $ $ -- $~ii0 E PROJECT OFFICE 2 MO $ $ $ . $ . E ARCHITECT-OWNER OFFICE 30.0 MO $ 800.00 $ 24,000 $ $ $ 24,000 E TRADES TRAILER MO $ $ $ $ E TOOL/STORAGE TRAILER MO $ $ . $ $ ,..,,...,.s ...... ,..,...... ·-- E STORAGE RENTAL MO $ $ $ $ . E 08 SET·UP/REMOVAL-1 1.0 LS $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000 $ $ $ 8,000 E OB SET-UP/REMOVAL- 2 LS $ $ $ . $ . E TEMPORARY TOILETS -1 30.0 MO $ 200.00 $ 6,000 $ - $ $ 6,000 --~-- $~~- E EMPORARY TOILETS- 2 MO $ $ . $ . E OFFICE FURNITURE· 1 30.0 MO $ 300.00 $ 9,000 $ $ $ 9,000 E OFFICE FURNITURE- 2 .. MO $ $ J._. $ . E OFFICE EQUIPMENT· FAX/Copy -1 30.0 MO $ 450.00 $ 13,500 $ -- $ $ 13,500 E OFFICE EQUIPMENT· FAX/Copy • 2 MO $ $ $ $ . E COMPUTER EQUIP./NETWORK • 1 1.0 LS $ 108,835.00 $ 108,835 $ $ $ 108,835 E COMPUTER EQUIP./NETWORK- 2 LS $ $ - $ $ E OFFICE SUPPLIES· 1 30.0 MO $ 250.00 $ 7,500 $ . $ $ 7,500 E OFFICE SUPPLIES- 2 MO $ $ - $ $ E TELEPHONE· 1 30.0 MO 300.00 9,000 $ 9,000 ...... $ $ ...... - $ $ E TELEPHONE- 2 MO $ $ . $" $ E POSTAGE & EXPRESS - 1 30.0 MO $ 200.00 $ 6,000 $ . $ $ 6,000 E POSTAGE & EXPRESS - 2 MO $ $ . $ $ E 08 SITE RADIO/NEXTEL MO $ $ . $ $ - E OFFICE ELECTRIC· 1 30.0 MO $ 500.00 $ 15,000 $ . $ $ 15,000 E OFFICE ELECTRIC· 2 MO $ $ . $ . $ - E OFFICE FUEL· 1 MO $ $ . $ $ E OFFICE FUEL- 2 MO $ $ . $ . $ E OFFICE PLUMBING LS $ $ . $ . $

CONSTRUCTION PLANTTOTAL .····. $ 236,83S $ . $ . $ 236,835 •· • ••

File Name =Staff Work Sheet Draft 1.xlsx/Constr Support Intellectual Property of Run Date= 10/23/14 4 of 8 Plante Moran CRESA, LLC PROJECT NUMBER: TBD PROJECT NAME: Macomb County- Central Campus Renovations (UPDATED VERSION)

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 35,000,000 CONSTRUCTION DEliVERY METHOD: CM Construction Manager as Constructor, with GMP

?reconstruction Construction START DATE: 11/24/14 3/17/15 FINISH DATE: 3/16/15 8/14/17

Mont~ ~.,_~_,; Q"Y_,; PROJECT DURATION: Pre-constr 4 16.00 112 Construction 29 125.86 881

CODE DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT (E) EQUIP.& {S}SUB- TOTAl NO. PRICE MArL (t}lABOR CONTRACTOR COST

SERVICES & SAFETY

-~ s TEMPORARY ROADS LF $ $ rs-· $ s TEMPORARY PARKING SF $ $ - $ $ s EMPORARY FENCE LF $ $ - $ $ s TEMPORARY B.~RRICADES LS $ $ $ $ E SECURITY ENCLOSURES LS $ - $ - ...... ,...... ,-.-rw..-...... -.; .-...... ~-~_- $ ~-i-· !---····--·-·· .. ·--··· t:s·~--~ $····---~·--=--- $...... r2-~~-...... :...... TEMPORARY CANOPY $ - $ s OB SIGN -Trade Cost EA $ $ $ $ - s EMPORARY WALKS LF $ $ $ $ s SOIL EROSION LF $ - $ - $ -----~----~ -~---~-----~--~~~ --~-~ ----~ ...... "'.---~---- f$----~~~-- ~-~- s PUMPING WATER LS $ - $ $ s TEMPORARY ELECTRIC SERVICE LS $ - $ $ $ s TEMPORARY WIRING/liGHTS LS ,...... _..._ .. $ $ $ $ E TEMPORARY ELECTRIC CURRENT -By Owner ·----MO $ - $ $ $ s TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LS $ $ $ $ s !TEMPORARY PIPING LS $ $ $ $ E !TEMPORARY WATER USAGE- By Owner MO $ $ $ $ E tTEMPORARY HEAT EQUIPMENT MO $ $ $ $ E TEMPORARY HEAT ENCLOSURES LS $ $ $ $ L HEAT TENDER- Trade Cost HR ,..,...... ~ ...... $ - $ $ ___ ...... ~ ...... ~ ...... ,...... ,...... !";--··-··-·~ E TEMPORARY HEAT FUEL MO--- $ - ~-$ $ $ E TEMPORARY LADDERS EA $ $ $ $ E TEMPORARY STAIRS/RAMPS FLT $ $ $ $ E RUBBISH CHUTES $ $ $ $ E RUBBISH DISPOSAL 30.0 LD $ 4SO.OO $ 13,500 $ $ $ 13,500 E PERIMETER RAIL LF $ $ $ $ E OPENING RAIL LF $ $ - $ $ E COVER OPENINGS LS $ $ $ $ E ENCLOSURES SF $ $ - $ $ ~-~~-~ DUST PARTITIONS SF $ - $ - $ $ E TEMPORARY BLDNG HEAT MO $ - $ - $ $ E EMPORARY PROTECTION LS $ $ - $ $ E SIDEWALK PROTECTION LS $ - $ $ $ E FIRE PROTECTION LS $ $ $ $ E FIRE EXT./HOSES LS $ - $ $ $ E FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1.0 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000 $ $ $ 5,000 E ENVIRONMENTAL LS $ - $ $ $ E SAFETY /PROTECTION LS $ $ $ $

SERVICES & SAFETY TOTAL • ·' .··_.-.· .... ·.· .. ·.·, l.S,soo $. - ,· $ - 18,500 •• $ ... $

File Name = Staff Work Sheet Draft 1.xlsx/Constr Support Intellectual Property of Run Date= 10/23/14 5 of 8 Plante Moran CRESA, LLC PROJECT NUMBER: TBD PROJECT NAME: Macomb County- Central Campus Renovations (UPDATED VERSION)

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 35,000,000 CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHOD: CM Construction Manager as Constructor, with GMP

Preconstruction Construction START DATE: 11/24/14 3/17/15 FINISH DATE: 3/16/15 8/14/17

Months Weeks ~ PROJECT DURATION: Pre-constr 4 16.00 112 Construction 29 125.86 881

CODE .DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT {E) EQUIP.& (S)SUB- TOTAl NO. · ... PRICE MAT'L (l)lABOR CONTRACTOR COST

EDUIPMENT & TOOLS

. -$-· -- E AUTOMOBILES ·- MO $ ------$ $ E PICK-UP TRUCK MO $ $ $ $ . E FLATBED TRUCK MO $ $ $ $ E LEVEL & TRANSIT MO $ $ . $ $ E MISC. LAYOUT MATERIAL MO $ $ $ . $ ...... --~~-.....-...... s··-~.-- !--':-·---~······ E AIR COMPRESSOR - MO $ $ $ . E FORK LIFT MO $ $ . $ $ E CRANE MO $ $ $ $ . E CRANE CARTAGE LS $ $ $ $ -- $·------~ E CRANE SET & REMOVAL LS $ $ $ . E GENERATOR MO $ $ - $ $ E EQUIPMENT OPERATOR MO $ $ - $ $ _-~ $ -·--_:--- E HOIST RENTAL MO $ $ $ E HOIST SET & REMOVAL LS $ $ $ $ E HOIST LANDINGS EA $ $ $ $ E HOIST INSPECTION & SERVICE MO $ $ $ $ E HOIST MOVES EA $ $ $ $ E HOIST FOUNDATIONS LS $ $ $ $ E HOIST OPERATOR MO $ $ - $ ~ .:,...... ~-~--~ ,1.... ~·- E ELEVATOR USAGE MO $ $ - $ $ E ELEVATOR CAB PROTECTION LS $ -· $ $ $ E ELEVATOR OPERATOR MO $ $ - $ $ E BOTTOM ENCLOSURES/HOISTS EA $ $ - $ $ E GAS, OIL & MAINTENANCE LS $ $ $ $ E MISCELLANEOUS SMALL TOOLS LS $ $ $ $

.... .: · .·. .·. EQUIPMENT & TOOlS TOTAL ...... $ ·.· - $ - $ -. '' $ - ·'·

File Name =Staff Work Sheet Draft 1.xlsx/Constr Support Intellectual Property of Run Date= 10/23/14 6 of 8 Plante Moran CRESA, LLC PROJECT NUMBER: TBD PROJECT NAME: Macomb County- Central Campus Renovations (UPDATED VERSION)

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 35,000,000 CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHOD: CM Construction Manager as Constructor, with GMP

Preconstruction Construction START DATE: 11/24/14 3/17/15 FINISH DATE: 3/16/15 8/14/17

Months Weeks ~ PROJECT DURATION: Pre-constr 4 16.00 112 Construction 29 125.86 881

CODE DESCRIPTION QTY: UNIT UNIT (E) EQUIP.& {S)SUB- TOTAl NO. PRICE MAI'L (l) tABOR CONTRACTOR COSI

MISCEllANEOUS

~---~- s LICENSED SURVEY LS $ $ - $ $ s INSPECTION TESTS LS $ $ $ $ s SPECIAL TESTS LS $ $ $ $ L ON-GOING CLEAN-UP HR $ $ $ $ s FINAL CLEAN-UP· Phase 1 SF $ $ $ $ ...... r----~~~- $-·~~~m '5' FINAL CLEAN-UP- Phase 2 SF $ $ $ L GLASS CLEANING SF $ $ $ $ s CLEAN ROADS & WALKS LS $ $ $ $ L PUNCH LIST HR $ $ $ -~-~~- . .. ~ J--~-- s SNOW REMOVAL LS $ $ $ $ - L PREMIUM TIME LS $ $ $ $ L SHOW-UP TIME LS $ $ $ . $ E TRAVEL ALLOWANCE LS $ $ $ $ E PARKING ALLOWANCE MO $ $ $ $ - E LIVING ALLOWANCE MO $ $ $ $ - RELOCATION EXPENSE LS $ $ $ $ ~+- TRUCKING & CARTAGE p $ $ $ $ E PROGRESS PHOTOS 30.0 MO $ 50.00 $ 1,500 $ $ $ 1,500 E C.P.M. CONSULTANT LS $ $ $ $ E PlANS & SPECS REPRODUCTION ·- 1.0 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000 $ $ $ 20,000

·.... · ..· MISCELlANEOUS TOTAL > ... · ·.. $ 21,500 $ - $ ··.··· - $ 21,500

PERMITS INSURANCE & TAXES

E BUILDING PERMIT- by Owner LS $ $ $ $ E SPECIAL PERMITS- by Owner LS $ $ $ $ E ESCAlATION LS $ $ $ $ E SPECIAL FEES- by Owner LS $ $ $ $ E SITE PLAN REVIEW- by Owner LS $ $ $ $ E BOND ON SUBS 32,100,000.0 LS 1% $ 321,000 $ $ $ 321,000 E PERFORMANCE BOND 35,000,000 LS $ 0,01 $ 210,000 $ $ $ 210,000 E BUILDERS RISK INSURANCE- by Owner LS $ $ $ $ E CONSTRUCTION LIABILITY INSURANCE 35,000,000 LS $ 0,01 $ 192,500 $ $ $ 192,500 E CASUALTV LOSS LS $ $ $ $ E RECORD DRAWINGS LS $ - $ $ $ s SUPPORT SERVICES LS $ $ $ $

··.·. •· .· P(:;RMITS, INSURANCE&TAXESTOTAL .. ' $ 723,500 $• - $ - $ 723,500

SUMMARY & ERROR CHECK EQUIPMENT& MATERIALS SUBTOTAL: $ 1,000,335.00 TRUE lABOR SUBTOTAL: $ TRUE SUBCONTRACTOR SUBTOTAL: $ TRUE UNIDENTIFIED SUBTOTAL: $ TOTAL; $ 1,000,335.00 TRUE

File Name = Staff Work Sheet Draft 1.xlsx/Constr Support Intellectual Property of Run Date= 10/23/14 7 of 8 Plante Moran CRESA, LLC STAFFING CASH FLOW

s::::::::::::::J:Hi·""*':t:::::::::~x::;;;m:::JiWJ::;:.;m::::.;m::::;.;;.:t:::ii·iii:;::.; ... J ;. ... r:: .. ;.. ,;c ..;;., ..... 3 .. .,r .....x :;;;;c;;;n::::;;;r:::w>:t:::;%ic::m:.a::::·iiH::::;;;.n;;:c: :::x ::::::o:::::::l :c:::::c:::r:::: l:::::::x:::::::c:::::r:::::c:J;i.. f::: .,.;,.J

!ntellectu•IProp•rtvol 8 of 8 Pl~~te Moron CR~SA, llC g) c Q(.J) o5.a o

Construction Company Professional Construction Services Statement of Qu lificati n

State ent Qualification For

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Construction Company Mt. Clemens, Michigan Prufe~~io!~

Status with SOS Registration State Filing Date NRAI Number California 9/6/72 Active C0664308 Colorado 2/12/09 Active 20081600632 Connecticut 1/17/13 Active 1094044 Delaware 8/5/11 Active 5021824 Florida 1/10/00 Active F00000000141 Georgia Active 9056611 Indiana 9/24/91 Active 1991090827 Kansas 6/21/11 Active 4522033 Kentucky 4/3/07 Active 661368 Louisiana 6/27/11 Active 40417887F Maryland 4/4/11 Active F14096812 Michigan Active Missouri 7/5/11 Active F01154766 Montana 6/2/97 Active F029820 New York 4/1/09 Active 3851274 North Carolina 9/1/09 Active 1091089 Ohio 7/8/96 Active 947485 Pennsylvania 10/16/13 Active 4221002 Tennessee 12/18/09 Active 620064 Texas 12/18/08 Active 801016676 Virginia 5/6/09 Active 295960

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Prufe~~il;l:~<;f Cqn~;tr;;ctkm S0rv:<::1~s Construction Company Profess~onai Construction Provide a proposed project staffing organization chart and the resumes/construction experience of the key individuals who will be committed to this project This will include the principal in charge, project manager, project superintendent(sJ field representative(s), etc.

PARTNERS I plante moran CRESA .. -- .. --- .. -- "'-~ REAl ESTATE CONSULTANTS

Director Estimating Project Director & Planning ChodRiehl Rob Conley Safety Manager Justin Bailey

Lead Project Estimator Estimator Manager Traci Brower Garry Myers Brad Pries

Project Engineer 1 Project Superintendent Superintendent Elaine H(])'l)pslead Jim Anderson

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens. Michigan Construction Company Gerald Boerner, Project Executive: Gerald will provide overall project input and participate as required during the duration of the project. Gerald's involvement in the project is considered part of our fee and his time will not be charged to the project.

Dave Reece, Pre-Construction Executive: Dave will provide overall pre-construction oversight. He will coordinate the work required to perform the estimating and pre-construction scheduling and be a liaison between the Owner and Clark Construction Company. Dave's time is also considered part of our fee and he is available as required throughout the duration of the project.

Chad Riehl, Project Director: Chad will provide overall project oveNiew and will also participate as required during the project. he has worked on numerous multi-phased, multi-architect projects and has the experience to keep the project team cohesive. He has minimal time included on the staffing chart but will be involved as required during the project throughout the duration of the project.

Jim Steiner, On-Site Project Manager: Jim will be involved full time on the project site. He will be the Project Manager responsible for the day to day coordination of the project financial, schedule and document management. Jim has an extensive resume of work in Macomb County and is very familiar with the local subcontractor base.

Brad Pries, Project Manager: Brad will be involved in the project during the busy start-up and turnover times as well as provide assistance throughout the project. He will help oversee the submittals, quality control, and daily project documentation.

Jim Anderson, Project Superintendent: Jim will be the on-site Project Superintendent. Jim has worked on numerous multi-phased renovation projects for both County and Municipalities throughout Michigan. He will be guiding the trade contractor work and fielding the daily questions and monitoring quality control.

Elaine Hampstead, Project Engineer/Superintendent: Elaine will provide assistance to Jim once multiple phases of the project begin. When the Administration Building, Circuit Court and Talmer Building are under renovation it will be too much for one Superintendent to effectively monitor all project activities. Elaine will oversee one of these projects and help Jim manage the numerous contractors and their scheduling and project documentation.

Rob Conley, Director Estimating and Planning: Rob will head up our pre-construction estimating efforts utilizing his staff of 6 estimators. He will be responsible for compiling the pre-construction estimates and assisting in any pre-construction exercises required to maintain budget and project schedule.

Garry Myers, Lead Estimator, Traci Brower, Estimator: Garry and Traci will assist in pre-construction estimating and provide the actual quantity take-offs and utilize our estimating software for the most current and accurate pre-construction estimates.

Justin Bailey, Safety Manager: Justin will be on site an average of one day a week, He will review project activities for safe work practices and assist Jim and Elaine with pre-task job safety plans and look ahead to upcoming project activities to ensure the proper method for perform the tasks is as safe as possible.

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company ?rotei<~J:il)i~Bl Cr.mstn;cti

As Vice President of Operations, Gerald's responsibility is to ensure the Clark team builds quality buHdings, on time and at the level of client satisfaction, profit, safety and environmental standards that meet corporate objectives. Gerald manages and supports all project personnel and job sites, ensuring conformance with Clark Corporate Procedures, including quality and safety.

During I> is coreer at Clark. GerolcJ llos been instrurnenial in developing the Firm's government and retail/mixed-use portfolio and has extensive experience with multi-phose renovation projects.

Gerald is part of the ownership team of Clark Construction Company. He has 31 years of experience on governmental, commercial, retail, and institutional projects. EDUCATION & TRAINING RELEVANT PROJECTS

B.S. in Civil Engineering from • Macomb Marketplace- Pre-Construction and Site Development of 18.75 acres Colorado State University located at 23 Mile and Hayes Road in Macomb County; $3.9 million

Washtenaw County Public Safety & Justice Center; $36 million Program Management contract • Ann Arbor Municipal Building; $40 million: 103,000 s.f. addition and renovation Capitol View Office Complex (Lansing, Ml)- $30 million; 160,000 s.f. office; 450.000 s.f .. 1.485-space pre-cast parking structure

• W. J. Maxey Training Center (Whitmore Lake, Ml)- $37 million: 165,000 s.f. new; 100,000 s.f. renovation

ADDITIONAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS City Walk of Rochester Hills (Rochester Hills, Fountain Walk (Novi, Ml)- $40 million Ml)- $8.5 million; 90,000 s.f. retail center lifestyle center Michigan Lean Construction Institute IKEA (Canton, Ml)- $25 million: 311.400 s.f. Midtown Square (Troy, Ml)- $30 million retail (LCI) and Chair of the lCI Research & Development Committee. retail store center Waterside Market Place (Chesterfield Twp.) Somerset Collection Expansion (Troy, Ml) Volunteers of America - Boord $50 million: 400,000 s.f. $30 million vertical expansion Member Independence Marketplace (Allen Park) Frandor Shopping Center (Lansing, Ml) Michigan State University $25 million; 175.000 s.f. retail center $15 million retail center renovation Construction Management Alumni and Industry Association Advisory Heritage Park North (Grand Blanc) Woodland Mall (Grand Rapids, Ml) Board $25 million retail development $18 million renovation

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens. Michigan Construction Company Prok~<~i(:l»:s DAVE REECE, AlA VE PROJECT ROLE

Dave is Senior Vice President and is responsible for Pre-Construction Services, Marketing and Business Development. Dave is also the Director of Clark Construction Company's Healthcare Practice and is responsible for all work completed at the University of Michigan.

As a 35 year veteran of the design and construction industry, Dave brings a unique blend of experience and expertise to the industry. Dave has earned the trust and respect of multiple clients in a wide variety of building types and is responsible for over $1 billion worth of projects in his career. His strong attention to detail, and the needs of his clients. has been the benchmark for his success in the design and construction industry.

RELEVANT PROJECTS

• William Beaumont Hospital- Troy Campus EDUCATION & - Site Master Plan- $214 million; 546,830 s.f. West and East campuses including TRAINING 236,000 s.f. Emergency Center and Critical Care Tower with 36 ICU/CCU beds; 124.000 s.f. Ambulatory Care Center: .S-bay Loading Dock/Pm"erhouse; 140,000 s.f. Bachelor of Science in Architecture 3-story vertical expansion of existing West Bed Tower; Connector Bridge to (BSAR) from Lawrence Institute of connect East and West Campuses; new MRI building. Technology - West Addition- $68 million; 260.000 s.f. 5-story addition featuring new Endoscopy ftoor; new Obstetrics and LOR/Postpartum ftoar; new Med/Surg foor with private Registered Professional Architect beds; Surgical expansion; Physical Therapy/Occupational Therapy Gym.

Member of the AlA Academy of • University of Michigan Projects - Kellogg Eye Center Expansion - $94 million Architecture for Health Knowledge Community - South Quad Residence and Student Dining Hall Renovations- $55 million - Ocker Field Hockey Stadium- $13.5 million Member of the AlA Design-Build Crisler Arena Renovations: $12.5 million Knowledge Community • Trinity Health- St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital Campus Regeneration Plan $33 million Pr1ase i of a two-phase $100 miliion canr;pus regeneration including a 50,000 s.f., two-story surgical addition with 12 advanced operating suites, central sterile processing and pre-op and post-op space.

ADDITIONAl PROJECTS PROFESSIONAl ASSOCIATIONS William Beaumont Hospital- Royal Oak Ascension Health St. John Hospital and Campus Medical Center- Master Facility Plan $132 million including new 307,000 s.f., American Institute of Architects (AlA) - Post South Hospital Central Tower Renovation $70 million. 213,000 s.f., eight-story tower with full service radiology, • Michigan Society of Architects (MSA) - Cook Chill Kitchen Renovation- $13 million cardiology, and 144 private patient rooms; American Society of Healthcare - Rose Cancer Central Vertical Addition - complete renovation and expansion of Engineers (ASHE) $13 million, 62,000 s.f. 30,000 s.f. Emergency Department. - Emergency Center Additions & Renovations Engineering Society of Detroit (ESD) Michigan State University Bioengineering $13 million; 32,800 s.f. • Macomb Oakland Regional Center Research Facility; $61 million; 130,000 s.f. Northern Michigan Regional Hospital -John (MORC)- Chairman Board of Directors & Mamie Demmer Well ness Pavilion and Central Michigan University; Biosciences Dialysis Center- $8 million; 38,000 s.f. Building; $95 million, 170.000 s.f. Member of Clark's Safety Committee

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens. Michigan Construction Company CHAD RIEHl, CPC OJECT CTO PROJECT ROlE

cr,acJ offers 24 years oi experience with Clark Construction Company on a 'Nide variety of projects including new structures and major renovations. For the past 15 years Chad has been primarily responsible for Clark's government and correctional projects.

As Project Director he has overall responsibility for the projects under his direction. Chad has completed 12 correctional projects and 18 courtrooms in 10 Michigan counties over the last 15 years. Chad throughly understands the intricacies of working in occupied buildings on active campuses and has completed several multi-phase projects.

RELEVANT PROJECTS

• Ann Arbor Municipal Building; $42.7 million; 103,000 s.f. addition and renovation EDUCATION & • Washtenaw County Public Safety & Justice Center; $36 million Program TRAINING Management contract • W. J. Maxey Facility- Green Oaks. Huron & Woodland Centers; $19 million; additions & renovations B.S. in Building Construction Management from Michigan State • Livingston County Jail Expansion 2014; $12.3 million; 55,000 s.f. University • Clinton County Jail Expansion (St. Johns); $2.5 million addition and renovation • Marshall Regional Law Enforcement Center; $8.5 million; 40,000 s.f. Certified Professional Constructor • Ingham County Jail Expansion; $2.3 million

• Clark Construction Company • Montcalm County Jail/Courts Complex; $12 million; 127 beds Environmental Management Ottawa County Administration Building; $7.5 million; 95,000 s.f. Representative • Ottawa County Jail Expansion; $7.7 million: 51,645 s.f. • State Prison of Southern Michigan Renovation; $25 million

ADDITIONAl PROJECTS PROFESSIONAl ASSOCIATIONS Ingham County 911 Central Dispatch MSU Breslin Center Expansion/ Facility; $4 million Alfred Berkowitz Basketball Complex; Chair of the Michigan Chapter AGC's Muskegon Community College Science $6 million; 29,000 s.f. Education Commi!tee Center; $9.2 million; 20,000 s.f. addition Alma Public Schools; $24.18 million bond program • Trustee for the AGC Educational • MSU Brody Complex Utility Infrastructure Endowment Fund Improvements; $1.75 million Marshall Fire Station; $3 million; 11,500 s.f. Michigan Infrastructure & Transportation • Lansing Center Expansion/Renovation $25 Past President of MSU's Construction Assn. (MIT A)- New Headquarters Office million; 70,000 s.f. addition Management Alumni Board Building; $4.2 million; 20,000 s.f. • Lansing Board of Water & Light- REO Town Past President of Mid-Michigan Country Club of Lansing Expansion; 12' Steam Pipe Line; $1.3 million Builders Exchange $5 million; 46,320 s.f. addition

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens. Michigan Construction Company JIM STEINER PR CT A PROJECT ROlE

Jim has been involved in the planning, management, and supervision of institutional, commercial and industrial construction projects with a primary emphasis on K-12 educational facilities that have involved extensive phased renovation for over 25 years.

Jim has been a part of more than $500 million of construction in southeast Michigan and multiple projects in Macomb County. Projects include existing building infrastructure renovations, additions and new buildings.

As a Project Manager, Jim is responsible for bid scope development, issuing bidding documents to trade contractors for bidding, contract administration, budget and project schedule oversight, material procurement, project reporting, monthly review of trade contractor billings, invoicing, and project closeout. EDUCATION & TRAINING RELEVANT PROJECTS

B.S.- Science Construction Macomb Recreation Center- Phase 1; $12.5 million; 70,000 s.f. Engineering from Lawrence • Macomb Recreation Center- Phase 2; $7.5 million; 38,000 s.f. Technological University Warren City Hall/Library/Parking Structure- $38.4 million; $115,000 s.f.: 620 spaces

• Majestic Plaza Renovation- $4.5 million: 43,000 s.f.

• Warren Community Center Renovation- $25.4 million; $180,000 s.f.

ADDITIONAl PROJECTS PROFESSIONAl ASSOCIATIONS Dearborn Public Schools- 1997 Bond 44th District Courthouse, Royal Oak; $7.5 Program; $89 million million; 27,000 s.f. Oakland Schools Technical Campuses Public Works Facility, Redford, $2.1 million; Renovation; $55.6 million 14.500 s.f. Oxford Community Schools; $34.5 million Fire Station #3, Redford Township; $2.4 million; 13,000 s.f. Ferndale Public Schools; $38 million Downtown Kalamazoo Parking Structure; Fremont Public Schools: $21 million $6.2 million; 310 space; pre-cast facility Coldwater High School; $11 million New Police Facility. Redford; $5.7 million; South End Community Center- Royal Oak; 50,000 s.f. $6.2 million; 43,000 s.f.

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company BRADLEY PRIES PROJECT E PROJECT ROLE

Brad has over 10 years experience in the construction industry and offers extensive expertise on MEP systems. As Project Manager he is responsible for coordination drawings and MEP submittal reviews. as well as schedule input for the related construction activities and logistical considerations. During construction he provides MEP quality control and also manages the trade contractors from bid documents through completion. He has mana-ged complex projects for tr,e healthcare and science industries an·d offers extensive expertise on mechanical systems.

RELEVANT PROJECTS • San Diego County - Cedar and Kettner Parking Structure. San Diego. CA. Assistant Project Manager; $25 million; 10-Story Cast In Place Parking Structure with 645 spaces; three (3) stories below ground and seven (7) stories above ground

EDUCATION & • ICO Development LLC- LA County Administration Building & Parking Structure, Los TRAINING Angeles. CA- Project Engineer: $65 m!ll!on Design/Build Core/Shell Offce Building including Tennant Improvement Buildout B.S. in Civil Engineering from Michigan UCSD School of Medicine Health Science & Biomedical Research Facility 2. State University, College of Engineering San Diego, CA- Project f\Jionoger; $116 rrd!!ion; 196,000 sJ.

OSHA 30 Hour Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Santa Barbara, CA- Senior Project Engineer;

CPR/First Aid Certification 370,000 s.f. with 340 beds for $300 million hospital addition • Ridgecrest Regional Hospital, Ridgecrest. CA- Senior Project Engineer; $30 million; approximately 49.000 s.f. with 43 beds.

• Kaiser Permanente West Wing Tower. West Los Angeles, CA- Project Engineer; $77 million hospital addition

ADDITIONAl PROJECTS PROFESSIONAl ASSOCIATIONS Collins Engineers Inc .. Chesterton. Indiana Design Engineer

ASCE- American Society of Civil Indiana Department of Transportation Engineers Underwater Inspection of Bridges, AISC - American Institute of Steel Statewide. IN- Inspection Engineer Construction Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC Oil • AGC - Associated General Contractors Refinery, Robinson, il- Inspection Engineer of America

Michigan State University Alumni Association

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Construction Company Mt. Clemens, Michigan Prof~~~bn;;l Cons~n.=cton 5<:

Elaine is a Construction Management professional with a 12 year record of success overseeing all phases of multi-million dollar construction projects in a variety of markets. Those markets ;nciude: MunicipaL K-12 and Higher Educational Facilities. Office. Healthcare, and Recreational. She has been involved in more than $275 million in phased, multi-building renovation.

As project engineer Elaine is responsible for bid scope development. issuing bidding documents to trade contractors for bidding, contract administration, budget and project schedule oversight. material procurement. project reporting, monthly review of trade contractor billings, invoicing, and project closeout.

Elaine has a high level of commitment to project success, excellent communication skills EDUCATION & TRAINING and a track record for great relationships with clients and project teams.

RElEVANT PROJECTS B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lawrence • University of Michigan South Quod Residence and Student Dining Hall Renovations Technological University $55 million • Charter Township of Highland- $4.9 million; new 25,000 s.f. 2-story library A.S. in liberal Arts from Henry Ford Community College • Ypsilanti District Library- $10.5 million,60,000 s.L new 2-story Whittaker Rood Library • AT&T, Alliance General Contractor, Multiple locations in Michigan, Indiana and Ohio - 5,000 projects totaling more than $800 million Detroit Public Schools- New Finney Crockett High School- $46.3 million; 221,000 s.f. • Novi Community Schools, Novi, Ml; $15 million; 2009 bond program Oakland Schools -$67.9 million additions and major renovations to four campuses • Cronbrook Educational Community, Bloomfield Hills. Ml- $14.3 million; renovations • Dearborn Public Schools- $44.2 million. 184,000 s.f. • Dearborn Public Schools- $89 million building program; additions and major renovations

ADDITIONAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Novi Community Schools- $35 million 1998 St. John Healtr, System- $600.000, 12.000 s.f. bond program; new middle school; convert renovation Pediatrics; $80,000, 6,000 s.f. existing M.S. to 5/6 building renovation to the Social Work Deportment; Novi Community Schools 80-acres of $600.000. 12.000 s.f. renovation to the Internal Medicine Department. sitework including new playgrounds, parking lots and site lighting St. John's Riverview Hospital- Emergency St. John Health System- $165 million North Room 8,000 s.f. renovation Pavilion project • Jewish Community Center of Metro Detroit City of Livonia, Community Recreation $22 million, 100,000 s.f. renovations and 22,000 s.f. addition Center $28 million, 130.000 s.f. new community recreation center

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens. Michigan Construction Company JIM ANDERSON OJ S PE I ENDE T

PROJECT ROLE

Jim joined Clark Construction in 1995. He is responsible for the daily supervision of construction activities in the fteld. Jim has worked on numerous multi-building, phosed renovation projects.

Jim's responsibilities include directing ond coordinoting subcontractor activities ond moteriol deliveries, directing daily jobsite activities, assisting the Project Monager with schedule, daily reports and work hour logs. He advises the Project Manager and/ or Architect/Engineer of design concerns, reviews shop drawings for accuracy, and is responsible for quality and safety of on-site personnel.

Through Clark Construction's continuous education, Jim receives 40-50 hours of training annually on a variety of topics including mold awareness, dangers of lead and how to EDUCATION & TRAINING identify hazardous building materials, scaffold safety. and more.

OSHA-30 certified RElEVANT PROJECTS • Washtenaw County Public Safety & Justice Center; $36 million Program US Army Corps of Engineers- CQM: Management contract Construction Quality Management for Contractors • Ann Arbor Municipal Building; $42.7 million; 103,000 s.f. addition; renovation

Completed AGC FCLM - Future lnghom County Jail Addition; $2.3 million Construction Leaders of Michigan Program • State Prison of Southern Michigan Renovation; $25 million • W. J. Maxey Facility Green Oaks, Huron & Woodland Centers; $19 million; additions & Certified in CPR, AED & First Aid tram renovations Michigan Construction Trades Safety Institute • University of Michigan Acodemic Success Center; $8.4 million; 40,000 s.f.

• Howell McPherson Middle School; $10.3 million; addition and major renovations

ADDITIONAL PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS FSU Program Management; $4.5 million Waterside Marketplace; $45 million; 455,000 s.f. CMU 2012 Summer Construction Program $1.5 million and CMU Beaver Island City Walk Retail Development; $9 million; Mesocosm Project; $450,000 107,000 s.f.

Howell Public Schools- New Hutchings Fountain Walk Lifestyle/Retail Center; Elementary; $12.8 million; 65,000 s.f.; $43 million; 80-ocre site 600-student building Twelve Oaks Mall Food Court; $6.5 million; Wonderland Village; $18 million; 60,000 s.f.; 35,000 s.f. 98,000 s.f. tenant pods Waverly Community Schools; $54 million Bond Program

Proposal for Construction Management SeNices Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens. Michigan Construction Company Profe!J~i=ii)!~<:;J (:(fnstr;;ct;<,n S(~n.>:~:l;>S JUSTIN BAILEY SITE FETY AGE PROJECT ROlE Justin develops and implements comprehensive safety programs for our jobsites. He provides safety oversight by serving as the point of contact for monitoring and maintaining safety compliance with OSHA and MIOSHA standards, as well as any other applicable safety regulations, during construction activities. Justin recently completed the Dow/ Kokam Battery Pack plant project and is currently working as the Site Safety Manager on the University of Michigan South Quad Renovations Project. His responsibilities include:

• Promoting jobsite safety and health

• Heighten employee safety awareness

• Perform jobsite safety inspections approximately four times per month.

• Enforce safety standards (i.e., use of hard hats, safety glasses, etc.) EDUCATION & • Follow up on corrective procedures TRAINING • Follow up investigation of all reportable accidents

Business Administration, Central • Maintain safety postings at all jobsites Michigan University • Report safety activities at monthly Safety & Health Committee meetings Certified CPR and F;rst Aid "First Responder" • Administer Safe-2-Work program at jobsites 40-hour HAZWAPER OSHA 500- Qua!;fted as an OSHA 10 RElEVANT PROJECTS and 30 Hour Course Instructor CSST Certified • University of Michigan Competent Inspector of Fall - South Quad Residence and Student Dining Hall Renovations; $55 million Protection - Ocker Field Hockey Stadium- $13.5 million Competent person in excavations • Kettering University- Atwood Stadium, $1 million

• Dow/Kokam Battery Pack Assembly Plant- $8 million; 60,000 s.f.

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Construction Company Mt. Clemens. Michigan Prote~;~il)11

CLARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACTIVE AND COMPLETED PROJECTS- 2004 THRU 2014

Construction Completion %of Work Project $Amount Cost Date Self-Performed Adrian Public Schools 2014 Bond Program $25 million $25,000,000 Aug 2018 0°/o Kathy Westfall, Chief Financial Officer Central Michigan University Bioscience Building $95 million $80,000,000 Jun 2017 0°/o Contact: Steve Esch, 989.77 4.1864 Muskegon Community College Science Center Contact: John Selmon, Vice President of Student Services, $7 million $7,000,000 Oct 2016 0% 231.777.0265 ...... ,_. • .._._,.,...... ,.._.,,.._...... ,.AO....._. AOO .... _._....._...... -'<»A.o~ ...... ~born P~blic Schools 2013 Bond Program $57 million $45,000,000 Aug 2016 0% Contact: Brian Whiston, Superintendent, 313.827.3000 Capitol View Office Complex Renovation $8.3 million $8,300,000 Aug 2016 0% Contact: Ron Boji, BojiGroup, 517.377.3000 Michigan State University BioEngineering Building $72 million $72,000,000 Jan 2016 0% Contact: Dan Bollman, 517.353.9575 Dart Containe-;: Building #5 Office Building - $25 million $25,000,000 Dec 2015 0% Contact: John Alfano, Facility Manager, 517.676.3800 Sparrow Hospital Gathering Place Contact: Austin Holcomb, Senior Project Manager, $8.5 million $8,500,000 Dec 2015 0% 517.364.2733 Fernco, Inc. New Office and Warehouse $18 million $18,000,000 Dec 2015 0% Mark Cooper, President, 810.503.9048 Livingston County Jail Expansion $12 million $12,000,000 Nov 2015 0% Contact: Belinda Peters, Adminstrator, 517.546.3669 City of Marshall Law Enforcement Center and Fire Station $14.5 million $14,500,000 May 2015 0% Contact: Tom Tarkiewicz, 517.781.5183 Ft. Stewart Advanced Source Operations Course $6.4 million $6,400,000 Apr 2015 0% U.S. Army Corps of Engineers IKEA Canton Warehouse Expansion $5.5 million $5,500,000 Mar 2015 0% Contact: Jim Hartzel, 610.834.0180 x 5151 Landaal Packaging Systems Bay City- Facility Expansion $5 million $5,000,000 Mar 2015 Oo/o Contact: Art Eckert, Plante Moran CRESA, 248.603.5286 Ferris State University Program Management Mike Hughes, Associate Vice President Physical Plant, $4.5 million $4,500,000 Mar 2015 0% 231 .591 .2920 Michigan State University Clinical "C" Building $8.5 million $8,500,000 Jan 2015 0% Contact: Todd Wilson, 517.432.4355 East Lansing Public Schools- MacDonald Middle School $7 million $8,000,000 Dec 2014 0% Renovation; Contact: Richard Pugh, 517.333.7470 Dearborn lntermodal Passenger Rail Facility Contact: Barry Murray, Director Of Economic Development, $19 million $18,960,000 Nov 2014 0% 313.943.2195 University of Michigan Field Hockey Stadium $13.5 million $13,500,000 Sep 2014 0% Contact: Mike Marenghi, 734.763.1249 University of Michigan South Quad Residence Hall Renovation $60 million $60,000,000 Sep 2014 0% s.~~~-~.<:=.~:.0.~.~.:.-~.'.'.~:~.s>.~~~~.. ~~r.:.~~.<:.~.~?.~!:-:::!.n.~:?.?.~J~~?...... H00o>ooH0000000000000000000000 ...... Westfarms Mall Entrance Contact: Len Brzozowski, Project Manager, The Taubman $12 million $12,683,000 Sep 2014 0% Company, 248.258.6800

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Pr::)k~miP?~

Construction Completion %of Work Project $Amount Cost Date Self-Performed St. Johns Public Schools 2010 Bond Program $64.3 million $65,239,000 Sep 2014 0% Contact: Dedrick Martin, Superintendent, 989.227.4050 Ft. Riley Physical Fitness Center $11.6 million $11,600,000 Sep 2014 0% U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Central Michigan University South Quad Improvements $4 million $4,000,000 Aug2014 0% Contact: Stan Mandzuik, 989.774.6550 Central Michigan University Dow Science Active Learning Classrooms $1.4 million $1,400,000 Aug 2014 0% Contact: Sara VanderVeen, Project Manager, 989.774.1910 Oakland University Upper Fields Contact: Terry Stollsteimer, Owner's Representative, $7.8 million $7,000,000 Aug 2014 0% 248.370.2100 Dart Container Corporate Office Building & Warehouse $50 million $53,000,000 Jul2014 Contact: John Alfano, Facility Manager, 517.676.3800 Gun Lake Casino Phase 2A Gun Lake Tribal Gaming Authority, $6.9 million $6,948,000 Feb 2014 0% Contact: David Wright, 816.752.0464 Mersen Manufacturing Plant $6.8 million $6,800,000 Dec 2013 0% Contact: Paul Krudy, General Manager, 989.835.7604 Troy lntermodal Transit Facility Improvements $6.2 million $5,392,495 Oct2013 Contact: SteveVandette, 248.524.3383 Fowler Public Schools 2012 Bond Program $4.4 million $4,392,000 Oct2013 0% Contact: Neal Hufnagel, Superintendent, 989.593.2250 Central Michigan University- Anspach Hall HVAC System $12.5 million $12,446,000 Sep 2013 0% Replacement; Contact: Steve Esch, 989.774.1864 Ft. Riley Battalion Headquarters, Kansas $13.9 million $13,900,000 Aug 2013 0% U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Swartz Creek Community Schools- H.S. Performing Arts $13.6 million $13,600,000 Aug 2013 0% Center; Contact: Jeff Pratt, 810.591.2381 Airport Community Schools- 2013 Summer Renovations $.5 million $461,000 Aug 2013 0% Contact: John Krimmel, Superintendent, 734.654.2414 Central Michigan University- Lab Research Facility $5.8 million $5,724,000 Apr 2013 0% Contact: Steve Esch, 989.774.1864 North Central Michigan College Health Education and $10.2 million $10,185,000 Feb 2013 0% Science Center; Contact: Todd McDonald, 231.348.6603 "fs·;~ii<;k~;;;--Ei~ti~;y·p;;~k-ri~·~;·;a:cicii!i·;~·-······································ ··································· ··································· ...... Contact: Mark Slater, Project Director, 989.941.9905 $9·8 million $9,082,000 Feb 2013 0% MSU- Shaw Hall Dining Center and Food Emporium $13.2 million $11,254,000 Dec 2012 0% Contact: Amr Abdei-Azim, 517.432.0323 FireKeepers Hotel & Events Center- Phase 1 Contact: Homer Mandoka, Tribal Chairperson, $76 million $76,000,000 Nov 2012 0% 269.729.5151x281 Airport Community Schools Bond Program $10 million $9,251,000 Oct2012 0% Contact: John Krimmel, Superintendent, 734.654.2414 Alma Public Schools, High School Renovations $9.7 million $9,646,000 Sep 2012 0% Contact: Sonia Lark, Superintendent, 989.463.3111 Greenville Public Schools 2011 Bond Program $14.3 million $13,741,000 Sep 2012 Contact: Pete Haines, Superintendent, 616.754.3686 Milan Area Schools 2009 Bond Issue Program $32.5 million $37,380,000 Sep 2012 0% Contact: Bryan Girbach, Superintendent, 734.439.5009 School District of the City of Detroit -Finney High School; rn;; $46.3 million $57,000,000 Sep 2012 0% Contact: Tom Cucuz, Project Manager, 313.304.8237 Lincoln Consolidated Schools 201 0 Bond Program $20.7 million $21,482,000 Sep 2012 0% Contact: Ellen Bonter, Superintendent, 734.484.7001

Aberdeen Maryland MATOC $18 million $18,000,000 Sep 2012 O% !!.:.~:.::::.~Y..~~~!?.~.. ?.!.~~-~-i-~~~:?......

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company ?to~e~rvctkn< S

Construction Completion % ofWork Project $Amount Cost Date Self-Performed Beaumont Health System Troy Campus - 7th Floor In-Patient Rehabilitation Unit $3.6 million $2,929,000 Apr2012 0% Contact: jake Meadows, Program Director, 248.964.9935 University of Michigan Crisler Arena Renovation $12.5 million $13,987,000 Aug 2011 Contact: Mike Marenghi, 734.647.0701 0% MSU - Brody Hall Renovations Michigan State University $49.8 million $39,098,000 Aug 2011 0% Contact: Dan Bollman, 517.353.9575 Child Development Center, Ft. Stewart, GA $11.5 million $11 ,500,000 Aug 2011 0% U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Grand Ledge Public Schools- Bond Program $34 million $34,000,000 Aug 2011 Contact: Matt Losch, 517.6267.5151 0% Akron Naval Marine Reserve Center, Akron, OH $11.3 million $11 ,300,000 jul 2011 0°/o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers john & Marnie Demmer Well ness Pavilion & Dialysis Center - Northern Michigan Regional Hospital $7 million $6,769,000 jul2011 0% Contact: Gary Rellinger, 2~1.487.4802 ~- Army Reserve Center, Ft. Custer, Battle Creek, Ml ------$10 million $1 0,000,000 jul2011 0% U.S. Army Corps of Engineers City of Ann Arbor 15th District Court & Police Building $42.7 million $40,097,000 jun 2011 0% Contact: William Wheeler, P.E., 734.994.2348 Michigan State University Emmons Hall Renovations $8.5 million $1 0,800,000 May 2011 Contact: Kenneth Dawson, 517.353.9716 0% Ferris State University College of Arts & Science HVAC $6 million $4,468,000 Dec 2010 0% Replacement; Contact: Michael Hughes, 231.591.2920 Washtenaw County Public Safety & justice Center- Ann $36 million $36,434,000 Sep 2010 Arbor; Contact: jim Zwolensky, 734.222.6639 0% State of Michigan- Green Oaks Center at W.j. Maxey Training $19 million $19,000,000 jul 2010 0% Facility; Contact: Ed Wilkins, 517.241.4499 Michigan International Speedway Suites and Media Bldg. International Speedway Corporation $17 million $16,237,000 jul 2010 0% Contact: Bill Braniff, 386.947.6679 Wright Patterson AFB Pipeline Dormitory- Akron, OH $11.6 million $11 ,600,000 jun 2010 0% U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Soldier Family Assistance Center- Fort Campbell, KY $5 million $5,000,000 Feb 2010 0% U.S. Army Corps of Engineers BRAC HPW Swing Space Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH $7.3 million $7,300,000 May 2010 0% U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kellogg Eye Center Expansion- Ann Arbor University of Michigan Health Systems $94 million $94,000,000 Dec 2009 0% Contact: Tom Abdelnour, 734.367.4164 Michigan State Police Headquarters- Lansing River Street Triangle, LLC $24.8 million $24,800,000 Nov 2009 0% Contact: jake Chapman, 616.248.3566 Madonna University Science & Media Building- Livonia $18 million $18,767,000 Aug 2009 Contact: Craig Flickinger, 734.432.5725 0°/o FireKeepers Casino- Battle Creek Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomis $140 million $136,350,000 jul 2009 0°/o Contact: Homer Mandoka, 269.729.5151 x281 University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross School of Business $126 million $126,000,000 Oct2008 0% Contact: Mike Marenghi, 734.647.0701 Howell Public Schools High School Renovations & Sitework; $25 million $23,500,000 Sep 2008 Contact: RickTerres, 517.548.6357 0% Fairlane Town Center Renovations- Dearborn The Taubman Company $5 million $5,900,000 Aug 2008 0°/o Contact: Bob Tremonti, 248.258.7317

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company ?totessh)~~

Construction Completion %of Work Project $Amount Cost Date Self-Performed Wonderland Village Center- Livonia Schostak Brothers & Co. $14 million $18,000,000 Aug 2008 0% Contact: Stephen Duczynski, 248.357.6137 Crossroads Village- Canton Grand Sakwa Properties; $15 million $13,635,000 Aug 2008 0°/o Contact: Gary Cooper, 248.855.5500 . Waterside M"arket Place- Chesterfield Twp. -- $38 million $38,272,000 Aug 2008 0% REDICO; Contact: Scott Wortman, 248.784.6524 Portland Federal Credit Union- Portland $5.5 million $4,447,000 jun 2008 0% Contact: Gary May, 517.647.7571 IKEA Home Furnishings- Cincinnati, OH $29 million $27,636,000 Mar 2008 0°/o IKEA North America, Contact: Mark Gasper, 610.834.0180 Twelve Oaks Mall Expansion - Novi The Taubman Company; $24 million $24,900,000 Sep 2007 0°/o Contact: Bob Tremonti, 248.258.7317 ~~~~~~~~-~-- -~~----·--- 1--· Fowlerville Community Schools Bond Program -- $50.1 million $49,000,000 Sep 2007 0°/o Contact: Richard Heinrich, 517.223.6016 Odawa Casino Resort - Petoskey Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians $108 million $96,000,000 jul 2007 0°/o Contact: Barry Laughlin, 2231 .758.2033 Howell Public Schools Bond Program- Howell $98 million $98,482,000 jun 2007 0°/o Contact: Rick Terres, 517.548.6357 Alma Public Schools Bond Program -Alma $24 million $24,000,000 Apr2007 0% Contact: Mark jacobs, 989.463.3111 Lansing School District Bond Program - Lansing $68.5 million $59,353,000 Dec 2006 0% Contact: Dave Phinney, 517.325.6115 Michigan State University- Steam Tunnel Extensions- East $11 million $11,000,000 Nov 2006 0°/o Lansing; Contact: Brad Bull, 517.355.3372 University of Michigan- Weill Hall and Gerald R. Ford School $27 million $29,401,000 Sep 2006 0% of Public Policy; Contact: Bill Kelly, 734.936.2395 Charlevoix Public Library Expansion/Renovations $7.6 million $6,200,000 Sep 2006 0% Contact: Valerie Meyerson, 231.547.2651 Webberville Community Schools 2004 Bond Program $8.5 million $8,600,000 Sep 2006 0% Contact: Brian Friddle, Superintendent, 517.521.3422 Lansing Community College Gannon VocTech Center Renovations- Lansing $11 million $11,000,000 jun 2006 0% Contact: Chris Strugar-Fritsch, 51 7.483.1813 Capitol View Office Complex- Lansing $30 million $30,000,000 jun 2006 0% Boji Group, LLC; Contact: Ron Boji, 517.377.3216 Emmet County 90th District Court & jail Expansion/Renovations - Petoskey $5.3 million $5,300,000 jun 2006 0% Contact: Martin Krupa, County Controller, 231.348.1702 IKEA Home Furnishings- Canton $25 million $23,000,000 May 2006 0% IKEA North America; Contact: Mark Gasper, 610.834.0180 Independence Marketplace- Allen Park $25 million $22,600,000 Apr2006 REDICO; Contact: Scott Wortman, 248.784.6524 0% MSU - Spartan Stadium Expansion/Renovations- East Lansing, Michigan State University $66 million $66,000,000 Mar 2006 0% Contact: Dan Bollman, 517.355.7541 Biomedical Science Research Building- Ann Arbor, University of Michigan $207 million $207,000,000 Feb 2006 0% Contact: Mike Marenghi, 734.647.0701 Mountain Run at Boyne- Phase I- Boyne Falls Bluegreen Corporation $11.2 million $11,200,000 jan 2006 0% Contact: Don jackson, 561.912.8285 East Lansing Public Schools 2002 Bond Program $66 million $78,000,000 Dec2005 0% Contact: David Chapin, Superintendent, 517.333.7420

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company CLARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACTIVE AND COMPLETED PROJECTS- 2004 THRU 2014

Construction Completion %of Work Project $Amount Cost Date Self-Performed

University of Michigan -Academic Success Center- Ann $8.4 million $8,807,000 Nov 2005 0% Arbor; Contact: Tom Whitaker, 734.615.8862 Lansing Community College- Health & Human Services $23 million $23,000,000 Oct 2005 0% Building; Contact: Kristin Pfauth, 517.483.1812 Mountain Run at Boyne- Phase II- Boyne Falls Contact: Kevin Steele, Regional Project Manager, $9 million $9,000,000 Oct 2005 0% 417.773.4349 !----·-·~··--- 1--·--·----- !------~ Haslett Public Schools Bo~-;rp-;;~;g~~~-- -- $29 million $30,752,000 Sep 2005 0% Contact: Mike Duda, Superintendent, 517.339.8242 Michigan State University- I.M. Sports Facility Addition/Renovations; Contact: jack Mumma, Construction $5 million $5,000,000 Aug 2005 0% Contract Administrator, 517.884.0772 1--·~---·--··- -~-·----~·- Webberville Community Schools Bo~d Prog-,:a~ $7.8 million $8,000,000 Aug 2005 0% Contact: Brian Friddle, Superintendent, 517.521.3422 Mountain Grand Lodge & Spa/Avalanche Bay Waterpark- Boyne Falls; Contact: Stephen Kircher, President, $95.4 million $95,400,000 jun 2005 0% 231 .549.6005 Harborside Office Center- Port Huron; Contact: Michael $30 million $30,000,000 May 2005 0% DeLong, Acheson Ventures, Project Manager, 810.966.0900 Lansing Community College Administration Building $7 million $7,000,000 May 2005 0% Contact: Kristin Pfauth, 517.483.1812 Lansing Commu,.;ity College M-TEC/Technical Training $39 million $39,000,000 Mar 2005 0% Facility; Contact: Kristin Pfauth, 517.483.1812 Michigan State University Food Science Building- East $17 million $15,600,000 Oct-04 0% Lansing; Contact: Phuong Nguyen, Engineer, 517.353.2291 Howell Public Schools 2000 Bond Program $51 million $51,000,000 Feb-04 0% Contact: Rick Terres, Associate Superintendent, 517.548.6357

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Prote~sio:1a! Cunstn.:ctkm 5!JrV!Gl~s ~o ..Q ..

Construction Company Profession(:~! Construction Services Provide a brief description of your firm's in-house pre-construction services and project (scheduling ond cost) management capabilities; and attach a project cost accounting and payment processing process flowchart

The key to a successful project is Pre-Construction Services. At Clark Construction Company we bring a combination of 68 years of historical data along with a combined total of over l 00 years of experience with our key personnel to give Macomb County a sense of reliability in estimating, scheduling and overall project development/management. We combine this experience with LEAN principles that we have adopted over the years to make the process collaborative and efficient.

Our LEAN principles directly correlate to our proprietary services in what we at Clark Construction Company refer to as the Five C's: Critique™, Clockwork™, Clarity™, Connect™ and Closer™. The underlying theme of each of the Five C's is to utilize our experience and industry best practices to deliver the project exceeding quality requirements while creating opportunities to save the Owner time and money in their construction project/program. Simply put, we complete each pre-construction deliverable and construction activity correctly the first time and one time only.

The following is a brief outline of some of the items Clark Construction Company will provide during the Pre Construction phase to benefit Macomb County:

Phasing and Sequencing Studies - We have attached an example of a preliminary staging and access plan for your review in section 14. Project Implementation Schedule. These types of drawings will be prepared at each phase of the project (approximately 3 month intervals) so that all parties, including the governmental authorities, are aware of our project approach. As with every project multiple forms of communication is the key to success and these types of graphics help to spark and fiush out ideas from all parties which allow for a smoother process of planning. Some of the other benefits to this process are as follows:

Identify locations for both Owner and trade contractors staging, utilities, and temporary road requirements.

Identify and obtain jurisdictional approval for access approach.

Work to utilize in a temporary manner final roads and utilities to save cost and increase efficiency of construction.

Identify Owner staging requirements for equipment installations and storage.

Constructability Reviews- Clark's Critique™ system is a collection of over 3,000 items and is a combination of Best Design Practices, Maintenance Concerns, Constructability Items and Lessons Learned. At each scheduled Constructability Review all team members will review the design documents published to date for completeness and compare with our internal historical database to identify and/or take advantage of common recurring design omissions or field quality issues, scope gap(s)/overlap, and previous lessons learned. Reviews are performed at each stage of the project. A deliverable list of our findings and concerns will be provided to the Owner, Owner's Representative, and the Architect. Some of the key items we will look for during the Critique™ process are as follows:

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Pro1~~~i01l<;l Constr;;ctkm S<.·r·,,~:~s Mechanical System evaluations including Life Cycle Cost

Drawing completeness including details.

Temporary Requirements

Mock up Requirements

Quality Control Measures

Review of scope to ensure no trade conflicts exist between jurisdictions of work

Safety concerns (during Construction and also for maintenance)

Lessons Leamed: Precast structure and slabs

Poec:aststructur« c;nd slabs

If a s;;:-uctur.e is made -of p~ecas:t concrete, the cam:'>er of >:he precast p!anl<;ng pf\.IS: the c::.();nmod1ow muo1 GH"l!Jm w:U come {.I'.Jt after -cur:ng {It lfi>.Ja!ly tak€!5 th,ee to four hours to ~::omc out). '"Mmlmum of 4" <:~!lowed.

PmjenType CM Bui!din9 Ty!}e ot ConstnKtlon

Document Review List CLARK Design Development • Construction Management Review Comments Construction Company rWNER' ARCHITECT' JOB: DATE:

B Drawin # T e of Comment Res onsibllit Comment Architects Res onse status ctvtUlANOSCAPlNG

ARCHlTECTURAL

fiRE PROTECTiON

a--+--+-----t-----+------+----1

MECHANICAL

ELECTRICAL

Document Review list 409FR035, Version 2 5!2712011

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Ptofe~t~ai C

During design development the 3D model serves a benefit to the Owner representatives to be able to visualize design elements and aid in the decision making process. It will be carried on by Clark and it's Trade Contractors into the construction phase for 3D coordination and clash detection between Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing systems.

The ClarityrM process minimizes requests for information (RFis), potential change orders (PCOs) and potential schedule impacts during construction. It also allows for the expanded use of offsite, pre fabricated systems such as mechanical piping to reduce field installation durations and accelerate the project schedule. During the design phase it is anticipated that a total of four full estimates will be prepared along with several minor estimates to study systems, products, approaches, etc.

The use of BIM Technology not only increases the accuracy of our estimates but reduces interferences in mechanical and electrical changes by nearly 50%. Utilizing this technology, in addition to our Timberline database and also receiving subcontractor input, has proven our estimates to be within 2-5"/o of bid cost.

Clash Detection Illustration Clash Resolution lflustration

The following are some other tools we utilize to help track the budget process and make it simple for all stakeholders to review and ev~lute budget status.

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Ptofesskmnr Constr;;ctk.m S.

PCI LOG IKEA Canton Expansion 2-17-14

CODES A APPROVED R= REJECTED H- ON HOLD

50% CD Set

Sitework C104 1.5" Temp Asphalt in leu ofTemp Gravel at Utility Removals $123,735 $0 $0 C106 Change Screen Wall (at Truck Dock) from Louvered Wall Panel to Concrete -$60,192..00 $0 C106 ~~ac~ge Screen Wall (at Truck Dock) from Louvered Wall Panel to Burnished

New Warehouse Addition A101 Isolated Slab for VASS (Verticle Storage Conveyors) $0 $2,924 $0 $0 Generator Rental for Entire store $0 $0 Cost !!el-- ' Hold Coat ,.. ··. Coat

$0 $2,924

Incorporated in Drawings & Estimate Sitework C104 1.5'' Temp Asphalt in Leu ot-.remp. Gravel 'at,Utility Removals $123,735 in estimate $0 $0 $0 C106 Change Screen Wall (at TrucltQGck)fr6n1 LoUvered Wall Panel to Concrete -$60,192.00 In estimate $0 $0 $0 Change Screen Wall (at Truck Dock) frOm Louvered Wall Panel to Burnished -$54,720.00 H C106 Block

New Warehouse Addition A101 Isolated Slab for VAS$ (Verticle Storage Conveyors in Existing Space) in Estimate $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Generator Rental for Entire store $32,000.00 In estimate $0 $0 $0

8/A300 Close off opening under the roof expansion joint (between existing beam $12,000.00 A $12,000 $0 $0 & A102 and new beam)

A102 Double Door Between Rm 355 and new Addition $3,000.00 $0 $0 $3,000

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Budget Variance Report - At the schematic phase of the project, we will work with Hobbs and Black Architects to review a 30 model and then perform a series of take offs sorted by CSI division and based on design systems that are provided. Throughout the cost estimating and variance report process we utilize a PCIIog to document intermediate changes along the way which may increase or decrease cost so that when the next estimate is developed there are no surprises. We have found that this process saves in re design and accelerates the decision process. We will also provide you a detailed variance report which will show all changes from the previous estimate.

Estimate Company Variance Report Page1 IKEA Canlon Expansion 5()';,; CD- Var~anc!L~_!P~rt"------c--- 'l/2812014 2:44PM

:.._____'~~CCCC~~CC~~~~~~~~~~~-· T~~•olf r--- --··· -,~~~~CC~i I Amounr IKEA.Canton IKEAC..nlt>n Expansocn50'(,CO Expanslon!>O%-CP Ex!>anslcn 50'~ CO Expan~lonW'k CD E•panslon50\\ CO ~ 2-4-2014 2..4·201~ V2 2-.1-2'014

00 ; "'""~ow~ e.eooreo

00 00 co: .• ::.~c::.> ~::; ~·:c~o:o::·.~

Value Engineering - During the Pre-Construction process we will work with Macomb County and the Architect to generate a list of ideas and evaluations of systems, products, and project approach to provide the best product for the lowest cost. Value engineering ideas and their cost impacts will be shown on the master PCI log and will be evaluated as the project progresses.

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Pt:J~,~~n>h>!~

Thoroughly analyze the condition giving rise to a potential change

Change process proceeds to the next step only if the condition is determined to be a valid change in the scope of work

Thoroughly analyze Trade Contractor quotations

Require Trade Contractors to make necessary quotation corrections

Submit to Macomb County for acceptance

Changes in the work will proceed only upon receipt of written approval authorization by Macomb County.

Equipment Review and Coordination of Direct Owner Contracts- Clark's Pre-Construction and Construction staff will schedule a plant tour and coordination meeting(s) with Macomb County and the Facilities Representatives as required to gain a thorough understanding of the manufacturing and storage process applicable to the new facility. Additionally, this will enable the Clark Team to identify and confirm adequacy of critical design and construction elements during the Pre-Construction phase. Clark will assist Macomb County and the Architect in the coordination and incorporation of required procurement of new equipment and relocation of existing equipment activities within the overall project schedule.

Cash Flow Analysis - Concurrent with our submission of each Budget Estimate and the Master Construction Phase Schedule, Clark will submit a cash flow analysis for the overall construction duration of the project. This analysis will include projected monthly billings for completed Work in Place and list individual monthly billings, accumulated billings to date, and percentages of completion on a monthly basis. During the construction phase Clark will maintain and update the cash fiow analysis on a monthly basis throughout the duration of the project.

Scheduling- Clark's schedule management process focuses on tracking and management of all major activities throughout the project life cycle, including design, permitting, bidding, contract award, material procurement, construction. commissioning, administration and staff occupancy. Typical Construction Phase project milestone activities include:

Site Mobilization

Construction activity start date

Construction activities

Commissioning

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company PTcfe~~lSiP!1-ill (::eynstr:.:ctkm 5.;,;·\/:(:~s Operational training

Project closeout

Administration and staff office set up

Administration and staff occupancy

Warranty follow-up

Clark Construction Company utilizes our proprietary Clockwork™ Tradehour Scheduling Process which provides precise work activity duration planning. This exceptional approach to planning construction activities eliminates the possibility of failing to meet project completion dotes due to lower than planned trade work production rates. Clockwork™ focuses on total trades hours, crew size and number of crews required to complete the work in a fixed time frame. Clark has developed on extensive database of proven trade hour production rates upon which the planned project production rates ore based.

During the post-bid review process, with the apparent low qualified bidding contractors, our production expectations will be confirmed and agreed to by the successful bidder. Minor schedule modifications may be mode as a result of the input of the successful Trade Contractor. This precise approach to schedule planning affects total Trade Contractor buy-in as the preliminary conshuction schedule becomes the baseline construction schedule to be incorporated into the trade contracts.

As construction progresses actual daily trade hours and production rates ore crosschecked against the baseline schedule. Any shortfall in daily production is quickly identified and corrective action taken as needed. As a result of this close production rate scrutiny, major schedule delays which would not otherwise be apparent for several days or weeks ore eliminated.

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Trade Contractors will be required to submit a two-week "look ahead" schedule each week which includes planned trade hours, crew sizes and production rates. Clark will crosscheck this "look ahead" schedule against the baseline schedule to assure the near future planned activities will meet the schedule requirements.

FireKeepers 6000

3000

0 1 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Month 0 o i\riua!

IKEACanton 3000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 \km.th 0 Actual. Tra.dP

The Clark Team will assure that Macomb County administration and staff will have adequate time to move into their completed spaces. These move activities will be included in the project schedule and strictly adhered to.

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company ?rofes~~~m~

Our Pull Planning efficiency is recognized by trade contractors, and as a result we receive better bids. The following is a letter from a trade contractor.

778 Bridgeview South

Saginaw Michigan 48604 John E. Green Company 989-752-5100 Mechanical Contractor FAX 989-752-0424 www.Johnegreen.com February 19, 2013

Clark Construction Company Attn: Bobby Lalonde 3535 Moores River Drive Lansing, Ml 48901

Re: CMU and Dow/Kokam Clark Project Teams

Bobby, It's my pleasure to write this note to you. I want to compliment you and your project teams at both Central Michigan University (Anspach Hall & Research Lab) and Dow/Kokam on an outstanding performance. The pre-planning in particular "Pull Planning" efforts led by your teams undoubtedly set us all up for success. We realized the labor savings (around 6%) from this coordinated project execution during Phase One of the Anspach Hall Renovations and incorporated them into our bid process to you on Dow/Kokam and CMU Research lab and guess what, it worked as planned. Thanks again for choosing John E. Green Company to be a part of your team, we look forward to continued success together.

Respectfully, John E. Green Company

Jason Essex Branch Manager

Proposal for Construction Management SeNices Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Pmfe~~;:im~

Drawings and Specifications Project Manuals Budget report PCI & PCO Logs Submittals RFI's Invoicing Correspondence Close out documents

Connect™ not only creates efficiency but on a project of this size has the potential for substantial savings to the owner in reproductions alone over traditional methods. In accordance with the draft contract agreement issued in Addendum No. 1, we understand the Owner intends to utilize their own project management system and we will cooperate with the Owner to ensure full compatibility between our electronic management systems .

..tJ ~ Frnject [)o{:um-~nts View Oxuments

~ D-:x:umer,t Cnntrol

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Pto1es5.il>!1<;1 Cl::mstr;,:ctkm S.;~n.>:~:;;.s Bid Process- Clark's bid process is set up to ensure that the Owner is delivered the best product at the best price. Hiring the low bidder may not always be the right answer for the project and we go through a series of evaluations of every bid package:

Trade Contractor Pre-Qualification- The Clark Team will utilize our extensive and internal web based Trade Contractor Pre-Qualification database and process to ensure that all bidders have the applicable experience, financial stability, and labor/equipment resources to complete the scope of work without compromising safety, quality or schedule. During the bidding period a master pre qualified bidders list will be developed and maintained. A special emphasis will be made to identify and solicit bids from qualified and capable Trade Contractors with a local/regional presence in and around Mt. Clemens, Michigan. Clark will conduct local contractor information meetings to help aid local participation in the bidding process.

Bid Packages- The Clark Team will prepare the Bid Packages to be used for bidding, negotiation, and award of trade contracts. Clark will formulate Bid Packages that are suitable to local contractors to the greatest extent possible without compromising the performance capability, quality or value in Trade Contractors to be evaluated and considered for recommendation of award to Macomb County. Bid Packages will describe the scope of work clearly and accurately. Unit prices will be utili?ed and established in each package to be able to quickly quantify unforeseen conditions such as undercutting and soil issues. Each Bid Package will include a copy of the approved form of trade contract and general conditions.

Contractor and Supplier Recommendations- After thorough bid evaluation the Clark Team will advise the Owner and make recommendations for contract award to the most responsive and responsible bidder.

GMP Process- A GMP for this project will be established after the receipt and analysis of the trade contractor's bids. After the bid opening a complete and thorough review of the bidders and the scope of work will be performed, Clark Construction will establish a detailed breakdown and bid summary of all the trade contractor bids and make contractor recommendations to the owner for approval. A GMP proposal will be developed and presented to the Owner and Program Manager for review and consideration. This will include the following:

1. A list of the drawings and specifications, including addenda and conditions of the contract that the GMP is based on.

2. A complete list of clarifications and assumptions made in preparing the GMP.

3. It will include the bid category summary cost of work, any allowances accounted for and a project contingency as referenced in the AlA 133 contract article 2.2 GMP Proposal and Contract Time. CCC's Project management fee and all associated costs will also be included in the GMP.

4. An anticipated project schedule upon which the GMP was based will be included.

Once the GMP is established a meeting will be set with the Owner, Architect and Program Manager to review the proposed GMP in detail and any adjustments needed to the GMP proposal will be made. Once

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Construction Company Mt. Clemens, Michigan Profe~rsio!~

Pursuant to the contract, the GMP Contingency will be evaluated throughout the project and reduce according to the schedule indicated in article 2.2.4.2 of the contract. All other requirements noted in the contract regarding the GMP will be adhered to.

Quality Control- Clark's quality management system guarantees that we consistently provide the highest quality administrative and on-site construction quality management service to our clients. Clark's project specific quality control program is incorporated early in the design phase. Pre-construction estimating, scheduling, constructability reviews, and value management are focused on achieving conformance to Macomb County's quality goals and expectations. Our construction phase quality program consists of the following significant elements:

Pre-Award Quality Review Clash Detection - 3D Modeling Systems Commissioning Trade Contractor Pre-installation Quality Conferences Material and Equipment Inspection Prior to Installation Material Samples and System Mock-ups First Work in Place Quality Inspection Continuous Daily Inspection Final Review and Acceptance

Project Close Out- As an industry, we recognized several years ago that if we plan our close out like we plan our buildings the end of every job is seamless and quick, providing a minimal punch list and overall better product for our owners. Clark's Closer™ process is the solution to this age old challenge that provides a structured, expedited approach to finalizing project close-out activities. Closer™ insures a seamless transfer of the building, which is paramount in assuring building users are comfortable and that all systems perform as expected.

Just like the pre-construction process, the key to the success of Closer™ is planning. The following items are planned, scheduled and managed under our close-out procedure and are the backbone of our process: Rolling Completion list Attic Stock Delivery Building System Inspection Testing and Balancing Certificate of Substantial Completion Commissioning Occupancy Certificate Operator Training Final Cost Reconciliation Equipment Operation Manual Turnover Final Billing Punch List Process Client Satisfaction Survey

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company ?r0k~<$il)!~.>:~:!}S Rolling Completion List- Clark's Rolling Completion List process is employed as each Trade Contractor completes portions of their work. The Rolling Completion List is a continuous process whereby our Project Superintendent identifies any deficiencies in the work and provides each trade contractor with a list of issues and required correction time frame. This process serves to eliminate items which would otherwise be on the project close-out punch list.

Punch list Process -Throughout the construction phase Clark will complete a work punch list for each Trade Contractor as work is completed. Items on this list will be corrected prior to formal punch list development by Macomb County and the Architect. Trade Contractors will be required to perform the corrections within a specified time frame in accordance with the project close-out schedule. Work not complete within the allotted time frame will be performed expeditiously by others at our direction at the expense of the responsible Trade Contractor.

Training- During the Pre-Construction process required training of the Owner's staff will be established. This training will be performed and videotaped to ensure moving forward the Owner has a manual for all major equipment.

Total Project Completion/Closeout- Macomb County can expect this project to be closed-out within 30 days of receipt of certificate of occupancy with final billing received within 60 days of occupancy. The Clark Team considers a project to be 100 percent when all required documentation is turned over, all costs are closed out, all work, including punch list is complete, and all systems are operating as designed and most importantly, when the user groups and administration are satisfied with the project.

Flow Chart of Closer™ Closeout Process

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Construction Company Mt. Clemens, Michigan Pro1es~;.il)!lHl Constr;;ctkm S<~;viu;s Clark Construction Company has completed more than 3.4 million work hours during the past 14 years with no lost time injuries and recently received the 2013 National AGC Construction Safety Excellence Award. Our Safety Program ranks among the top in the country.

The key to a successful project starts with safety. By creating a safety culture for the project at the beginning that mirrors the safety culture that Clark Construction Company lives and breathes, we will collectively ensure the safety of the public, your staff and all of the contractors involved in the project.

We firmly believe that no matter how much you train, discuss and promote safety; you cannot succeed unless all of the companies and contractors on our project team lead from the top down. Clark Construction Company has had tremendous success and continually takes an "outside the box" approach to ensure everyone's safety.

Jim Anderson, our superintendent for this project. has worked for Clark Construction for over 20 years without a lost time incident on one of his projects.

We will implement the following safety activities on top of maintaining all of the OSHA Standards that all contractors are required to adhere to:

Site Specific Orientation: As each trade contractor employee, CLARK Construction Company architect/engineer, vendor, owner's staff, consultants, etc. come on to kHln,',""'"''-'""'"""b"'':,,,~.,,,~ the site they will be required to go through a site specific orientation after reviewing and signing off on the Clark Team Safety Guide. The orientation will point out the potential hazards on this specific project including: access in and out. emergency evacuation plan, emergency gathering area, areas that are "off limits", and site specific rules and regulations required by Macomb County.

Weekly Tailgate Meetings: These meetings will be held in the construction meeting trailer and all contractors that are on site are required to have their full site staff attend. Clark will lead these meetings and they will consist of review of any safety items from the previous week, a "Toolbox Talk" that is relevant to the work currently underway, as well as an open group discussion on how the project team can continually improve

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Pto!e~

commitment to safety. Days that Contractor will be working on site: Project Name;

Supervisor/Foreman:------

Monthly Executive Safety Meetings: Clark will hold a monthly List work to be completed&. location; Executive Safety Meeting on site and will require that on executive Work Task -#1: level person from each company working on the project be in Work Task #2: attendance. We will have a safety speaker discussing a topic relevant to the current activities on the project and all executive and Work Task #3: field personnel will be required to attend. We will encourage any Work Task #4: owner's personnel involved in the project to attend and participate in these meetings. Clark will provide lunch for everyone on site. After Do tasks require special trammg? Oves DNa Tfyes,whattype? ------the lunch and speaker are complete, we will hove the executives Tradehours: Describe work and tradehours involved: stay for on open forum discussion on how we con collectively 1. ______Hrs. Hrs. lead from the top down. We will assess and implement any of the 3. ______Hrs. '·------Hrs. ideas that fit our project. During the visit from the executives we will Ustequipmentandhoursofoperatmn: Hrs. encourage them to conduct a walk-through of the site to reinforce :------Hrs. Hrs. to the trades that they hove the full support of the management :------Hrs. team. General Information: * Should RegionalfJobsite Safety be involved in the planning of thisjob? DYes 0No

'" Potential hazards associated with the task? Pre-task Planning: Clark requires pre-task plans be filled out doily Ochemlcal Bum 0Trips/Siips/Falls DExtreme Weather 0Fire/Explosion and reviewed with our on site management team to ensure their 0ParticlesinEye ospills Ooverexertion 0Abrasion/Cuts/Bums activities are coordinated with the owner events, other trades work, 0Eievatedload ocave-ins 0Fallsover6ft. 0LoudNoises critical lifts, etc. These plans are reviewed with the subcontractor's 00verheadWork 0Sprains/Strains 0PinchPoints 0Falling0bjects entire crew to assure all team members are on the page. We 0Lead/Asbestos 0VehicleTraffic Ocranes/Rigging 0PowerTools hove found that if you plan a task safely that it will inherently be a Olive Utility Work/Eiectncal Shock 0UsingHazardousMaterials quality installation which ensures that schedule be met as it will be Oother(Explain) Have these hazards been explained to the employees? completed right the FIRST TIME. oy., DNo Identify procedures to betaken to eliminate or control potential hazards: Safety Recognition: We firmly believe that the safety culture is created through positive reinforcement continued training and recognition. We look forward to meeting with the owner and putting a plan in place to recognize exceptional efforts both individually and with contractors.

These are examples of recognizing safe behavior that have been used on past projects:

Safety Incentives - On a monthly basis prizes are given to recognize those people on site who exhibit exceptional safety procedure.

End of Project Drawing - Each tradesperson is encouraged to identify and report possible unsafe acts or procedures to Clark and in return their name is put in a drawings for a end of project prize.

Clark Subcontractor Safety Award - Each year one subcontractor is recognized for their excellence in safety and given a plaque.

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Ptofe::;sim:'-''C~"s Safety Record- Clark's Experience Modification Rote (EMR) is currently .70, compared to on industry standard of 1.0. This places Clark in the safest 1% of contractors in Michigan. Additionally, Clark has completed more than 3.4 MIOSHA million work hours during the post 14 years with no lost time injuries and recently Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration received the 2013 National AGC Construction Safety Excellence Award. The Clark Team has received numerous safety awards, including:

MIOSHA 2010 CET Platinum Award the first construction company to receive this important award; 2,450,321 continuous hours worked with no lost time injuries from December 2000 to January 201 0

MIOSHA 2005 CET Gold Award

Outstanding Safety Performance Award Accident Fund Company of America 2 million hours with no lost time injuries (2008) l million hours with no lost time injuries (2006)

LEED/Sustainable Buildings- Clark Construction Company has managed construction of 26 LEED certified buildings. LEED, or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is on internationally recognized mark of excellence, that provides building owners and operators with a framework for identifying and implementing practical and measurable green building design, construction, operations and maintenance solutions.

Award-winning Team "American Business Ethics Award"- Clark Construction Company is the only construction firm in the notion to receive this notional recognition for ethical business practices

Three prestigious, notional "Build America Awards" for exceptional ABEA management of challenging projects:

2006- Mountain Grand Lodge and Spa/Avalanche Bay Waterpark 1996 - Oldsmobile Park Minor League Baseball Stadium 1993 - Somerset Collection

Seven "Build Michigan Awards," the state equivalent of the notional award:

2011 -Ann Arbor Municipal Center 201 0 - Michigan International Speedway Suites & Media Building 2009 - FireKeepers Casino 2006- University of Michigan Biomedical Science Research Bldg. 2005 - Mountain Grand Lodge and Spa/Avalanche Bay 1999 - Bay Harbor Marina District 1998 - Holy Childhood of Jesus Church 1996 - Oldsmobile Park Minor League Baseball Stadium

AGC of Michigan's "Cornerstone Award for Training Excellence"

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Construction Company Mt. Clemens, Michigan Prut~~sh;m..=cti

Project Manager Send to Manager Approval for Approval

Send to Accounting for Processing

Enter the Invoice into eCMS

Subcontract payments are Standard invoices are paid made when payment is in the next check run received by the owner

Check copies are filed with the invoice

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Construction Company Mt. Clemens, Michigan Pr-ot<~~~>i!)r.

(/) 0 (i) -<- 'lJ 0 co 0 3

Construction Company Profess~onal Construction Serv~ces Tony serves as Director of Safety and is responsible for coordinating and directing safety programs and managing the field safety coordinator. During his tenure as Safety Director, Clark Construction Company has been recognized for having an exceptional safety program, completing more than 3.4 million work hours during the past 14 years with no lost time injuries and recently receiving the 2013 National AGC Construction Safety Excellence Award.

The Clark Team has received numerous safety awards, including:

MIOSHA 201 0 CET Platinum Award -the first construction company to receive this important award; 2,450,321 continuous hours worked with no lost time injuries from December 2000 to January 2010

MIOSHA 2005 CET Gold Award

Outstanding Safety Performance Award -Accident Fund Company of America 2 million hours with no lost time injuries (2008) l million hours with no lost time injuries (2006)

Tony heads the Clark Safety Committee and coordinates the company's annual Safety Seminars. Tony has attended and/ or received the following safety training:

• First aid and CPR training

• 10-hour OSHA

• MUST Safety Program

Michigan Construction Safety Day

• Clark Construction Bi-Annual Safety Training

• 2-hour Asbestos Abatement Training

Tony has a Masters in Business Administration from Central Michigan University and a Bachelor's degree in Accounting from Michigan State University.

Association Memberships:

• Michigan Chapter AGC- Safety Committee

• Construction Financial Managers Association (CFMA)- Board Member and Past President

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Prot·~~n>h>n<.;l C

L Construction Company Protessional Corwtng;:Hc.;,n Services

Safety and Health Training Program

Course Frequency # of Employees Training Conducted By:

Michigan Construction Trades 1st Aid/CPRIAED Annual 80 Safety Institute

Clark Construction Company MIOSHA, NSRC Safety, Willis Insurance, Safety Seminar 2 times per year 94 Michigan AGC

Michigan Construction Safety Day Annual I 5 Michigan AGC/MIOSHA

Asbestos Awareness Annual 9 Michigan AGC I Northern Analytical

LEED Training and Certification IS U.S. Green Building Council

I 0-Hour OSHA 30 Michigan AGC/Ciick Safety

30-Hour OSHA 36 Michigan AGC/Ciick Safety

Mold Awareness Annual 5 Michigan AGC

Lead Remediation Annual 13 Michigan AGC

Safety Guide Program All Employees CCC Safety Committee

Tool BoxTalks 2 times per month All Employees CCC Safety Committee

Proposal for Construction Management Services Macomb County Central Campus Renovation CLARK Mt. Clemens, Michigan Construction Company Pm1e$Sionnt C<::mstr;;ction 5<;rv:(:I~S