Friday, February 21, 1969 Fourth Series1R.5 Phalguna 2, 1890 (Saka)
/2.6$%+$ '(%$7(6
Seventh Session Fourth/RN6DEKD
/2.6$%+$6(&5(7$5,$7 New Delhi CONTENTS
No. 5.-Friday, February 21, 1969/Phalguna 2,1890 (Saka) Columns
Oral Answers to Questions- ·Starred Questions Nos. 91 to 93 1-29 Written Answers to Questions- Starred Questions Nos. 94 to 120 29-51 Un starred Questions Nos 560 to 656, 658 to 667, 669, 671, 672, 675 to 699, 701 to 712, 714 to 719, 724 to 737 and 741 to 758 51-205 Calling Attention to Matter of Urgent Public Importance- Reported talk at the Indian Law Institute by a senior civil servant on current political-cum-constitutional problems. 205-08 Papers Laid on the Table 208-211 Estimates Committee- Sixty-sixth Report 211-12 Public Accounts Committee- Forty-third Report 212 Committee on Public Undertakings- Twenty-fifth Report 212 Business of the House 212-13 Motion of Thanks on President's Addr." 213-278 Shri Mrityunjay Prasad 213-27 Shri Bal Raj Madhok 227-47 Shri Prem Chand Verma 247-58 Shri S. K. Sambandan 258-64 Shrimati Sudha V. Reddy 264-269 Shri Yogendra Sharma 269-278 Committee on Private Members Bills and Resolutions Forty-third report 278-292 adopted, as amended ... Bills Introduced- (I) The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Bill, 1968. 292-293 (/nurtion of n~H' .,~clion /2/ B) by Shri Kanwar Lal Gupta. (2) The Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 1968. 293 (Substitution of article 43) by Shri Kanwar Lal Gupta. (3) The Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 1968. 293 (Amemiment of articl~s 75 and /(4) by Shri Kanwar Lal Gupta. (4) The Income-ta. (Amendment) Bill, 1969. (A""mdment of section SOC) by Shri S. S. Kothari "11Ie si.., + marked above the name of. Member indicates that the qllCltion was actually asked on the floor of the House by that Member. ii
Columns (S) The Public Undertakings (Compulsory Approval of Agreements) Bill. 1969 by Shri S. S. Kothari. 294 (6) The Gold (Control) Amendment Bill. 1969. (Amendment of sections /6. 27. etc.) by Shri Benoy Krishna Daschowdhury. 294-295 (7) The Constitution (Amendment) Bill. 1969. (Amendment of articles 32 and 226) by Shri Tenneti Viswana- tham. 295 (8) The Constitution (Amendment) Bill. 1969. (Amendment of eighth Schedule) by Shri Bhogendra Jha .. 295-296 (9) The Constitution (Amendment) Bill. 1969. (Amendment of article 240 and First Schedllle) by Shri Benoy Krishna Daschowdhury. 296 (10) The Food Corporations (Amendment) Bill. 1969. (Substitllti,," of sectiOiI 34) by Shri C. C. Desai. 296 (II) The Central ni ~siti s (Students' Participation) Rill, 1969 by Shri Madhu Limaye. 297 (12) The University Grants Commission (Amendment) Bill. 1969 (lmertion of IIelV sectivII 12A etc.) by Shri Madhu Limaye. 297 (13) The Representation of the People. (Amel/dment) Bill. 1969 (Amendme"t of seclio" 61) by Shri Maharaj Singh Bharati. 297-298
(14) The Adoption of Religion Bill. 1969. by Shri Maharaj Singh Bharati. 298 Constitution (Amendment) Bill. (Amendment of articles 80 and 17/) by Shri C. C. Desai. 298-340 Motion to Consider. Shri C. C. Desai 298-303 Shri S. Kandappan 304-306 Shri Kanwar Lal Gupta 306-310 Shri Randhir Singh 310-31S Shri P. Ramamurti 315-320 Shri S. M. Krishna 320-321 Shri Sheo Narain 321-324 Shri Sarjoo Pandey 324-325 Shri Lobo Prabhu 326-329 Shri M rityunjay Prasad 329-331 Shri K. Lakkappa 331-332 Shri Govinda Menon 332-338 Withdrawal by Member of certain remarks made by him durill/l ques- tion hour. 304 Withdrawal of notice of Privilqe Motion. 306 LOK SABHA DEBATES
2 LOKSABHA for all purposes as on 1-8-1966 at the 12 monthly averaae level, 175 of Friday, February 21, 1969/ Phalguna 2, the All India Averaae workina Class 1890 (Saka) Consumer Price Index (General) (1949-100).
The Lok SaMa met at Eleven of the (ii) Facilities to recognised unions/ Clock. associations of Central Government employees like the grant of special [MR. SPEAKER in the Chair] casual leave to office bearers for participation in the activities of the ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS unions/associations, the facUity to the Chief Executive of the union Meeting of National Council of Joint or its General Secretary of Seeklna Consultative Machinery transfer to the headquarters of the + appropriate head of the administra- *91. SHRI N. K. SANGHI : tion, and deputation on foreilD SHRI R. R. SINGH DEO : service of elected office bearers of SHRI P. C. ADICHAN : unions/associations. SHRI HIMATSINGKA : (c) Orders regarding merler of dear- SHRI Y. A. PRASAD: ness allowance with pay have already SHRI RAMACHANDRA been issued. Orders regardinl facilities VEERAPPA: to recognised unions/associations on the basis of the decision in the Council will Will the Minister of HOME AFFAIRS be issued shortly. be pleased to state: SHRI N. K. SANGHI : Prices are (a) Whether it is a fact that a meeting aallopina for the last 20 years to a point of the National Council of the Joint Con- of no return. May I know from the hon. sultative Machinery was held in December, Minister if a request has been made by 1968 regarding the demands of the Central the Central Government employees for Government Employees; revising the present formula of fixinl dearness allowance as there has been a (b) if so, the decisions taken in the lot of criticism before and, In cue the meetina; and Government has made any studies, (c) by which time these decisions whether Government have any proposal will be implemented ? by which the existina formula of ftxlna dCllJ1lClS allowance is proposed to be THE DEPUTY MINISTER IN THE replaced ? MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (SHRI K. S. RAMASWAMI): (a) Yes, SHRI K. S. RAMASWAMY: This Sir. matter was also considered by the Na- tional Council but a decision had been (b) Final decisions were taken on the deferred. followina two items :- SHRI N. K. SANGHI : Employees (I) FuU IIICfICI' oC Dearness A lJowance Fltina above RI. 999 have been kept out with pay upto a basic pay of Rs.999/- of the purview of the Joint Consultative 3 Oral Answers FEBRUARY 21, 1969 Oral Answers 4
Machinery. May I know if the Govern- tunately, no decision was taken. Merely ment also proposes to set up some other because they participated in the strike, machinery by which employees getting their recognition was withdrawn. They above Rs. 999 can also be brought within were not allowed to attend the J. C. M. the purview of this consideration; also, meeting. I protest against that. This whether for the employees of the State action was taken by the Home Ministry Governments, who are considered as third only to give some blood plasma to the class citizens and who never get parity most anaemic organisations which served with Central Government employees, their cause. Government has any machinery through which they can negotiate with State Go- Now, my question is whether it is a fact vernment to see that their employees are that this decision of merger of D. A. with also brought at par with the Central Pay has been at 170 points though the all- Government employees? India index at that time was 215 and. if so. what is the reason for that. Secondly. THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE I would like to know whether it is a Fact MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS that out of 22 lakh Central Government (SHRI VIDY A CHARAN SHUKLA): employees, nearly 40 per cent of the As far as employees getting a basic employees are going to be adversely affec- pay of more than Rs. 999 are ted because. excepting that some employees concerned, it is not that these emp- who are getting house rent allowance may loyees' case was not considered but when get more, those who are living in Govern- the question of full merger of dearness ment quarters may lose more and. iF so. allowance with pay was considered, only whether any action has been taken to see employees getting basic pay up to Rs. 999 that adverse effect does not take place. were considered and a decision taken. This is all that this particular National SHRI VIDYA CHARAN SHUKLA: I Council meeting has done. would like to draw the attention of the hon. Member to clause 7 (I) of the J. C. SHRI HIMATSINGKA : Has the hon. M. which indicates that only the repre- Home Minister got an assurance From sentatives of such federations or unions the employees that they will abide by the which are recognised by the Government decisions arrived at in the consultative shall be invited or shall sit in the J. C. M. committee and, iF not, is there any good The members of the de-recognised unions. to have such a consultative committee? thereFore ......
SHRI VIDYA CHARAN SHUKLA: SHRI S. M. BANERJEE: Kindly un- When they participate in the National derstand my question. Council meeting and are party to a decision, it goes without saying that they MR. SPEAKER: Let him answer. will abide by the decisions taken.
SHRI S. M. BANERJEE: Sir, beFore I SHRI S. M. BANERJEE: Please read put my supplementary, I want to protest the clause. aaainst the gross injustice done to our Federations, that is, the National Federa- SHRI VIDYA CHARAN SHUKLA: I tion of Posts and Telegraphs Employees. am reading the clause. It says: the All-India Railwaymen's Federation and the Confederation of Central Government "The staff side may consist of 260 Employees who were not allowed to attend members who will be nominated by the J. C. M. meeting on 27th December, the recognised organisations in the 1968 in spite of the Fact that there is no manner prescribed ... " provision in the constitution of the J. C. M. which debars a member who has been This envisap that the represeDtatives nominated or elected by a particular of those recognised unions which were de- orpnisation. This was broulht to the recollDised fol/owinl the illeaal strike were notice of the han. Minister. But, unfor- Dot to be invited. Therefore, they were Ora/ Answers PHALGUNA 2. 1890 (Saka) Ora/ Arrawers 6 not invited to come and participate in the J. C. M. meeting there was a proposal to Council meeti1lll. meet the Deputy Prime Minister. As far as the second point is concerned. it really As regards the second point. as I un- does not concern ·this Question which is derstand from the hon. Member. about before the House. If a separate notice is certain employees of Government who are given, I shall answer it. living in Government quarters and who might suffer some adverse consequences SHRI SURENDRANATH DWIVEDY: because of this. as their Pay will go up Does the hon. Minister not think that the because of the merger of D. A. with Pay, real purpose of this Joint Consultative in the matter of certain allowances, the Machinery would be defeated if repre- house rent allowance, the children allow- sentatives of all sections of labour do not ance and other allowances, we have taken participate in the deliberations? It appears up the matter with the Finance Ministry. from his reply that the de-recognised We want to settle it so that there is no unions' representatives were debarred from undue hardship to any section of the Cen- attending. acoordinll to rules. Since the tral Government employees because of atmosphere now is normal and they want this D. A. merger with pay. to prticipate in the discussions, would the Government consider the necessity of SHRI S. M. BANERJEE: On a point giving them recognition aaain SO that the of clarification. When the unions nomi- representatives can participate in these nated their representatives, they were discussions? recognised. Unless the National Council meeting is held and no-confidence is SHRI VIDY A CHARAN SHUKLA: passed against them, they cannot be This is a question of recognition and de- excluded. I am putting it to the Minister recognition of unions. Those unions of through you. Sir. An unrepresentative the government servants which behaved in meeting of the Council was held. a responsible manner have not been de- recognised; only those which defied the SHRI CHINTAMANI PANIGRAHI: , law passed by Parliament have been de- would like to know from the hon. Minis- recognised. In the National Committee. ter whether, after the meeting of the J. C. we do want the responsible representatives M. was over, the members also wanted to of workers to come and talk. We can meet the Deputy Prime Minister and the deal with only such people who are recol- Finance Minister, to settle the question nised by Government; we cannot deal with regard to the basis of agreement, as with unrecognised unions. to whether it should be at 175 points or l8S points because the price index at that time SHRI S. M. BANERJEE: You want us was 215. I would like to know whether to behave as underground Nagas! any discontent was expressed in the meet- ing and whether it was also decided that SHRI SURENDRANATH DWIVEDY: this matter will be again taken up after My question was whether the Government consultation with the Finance Minister would consider recognising those union. and it can be increased to 185 and, if so, again so that those representatives can what is the decision taken. Secondly, I participate in the discussions. would like to know from the hon. Minister whether any thought is being given to the SHRI VIDYA CHARAN SHUKLA: idea that the average price index should We are not consideri1lll that matter. not be compiled yearly but quarterly be- cause the prices are increasing quarterly SHRI K. RAMANI: The hon. Minister and even monthly also so that the himself has qreod that the recognitlon of dearness allowance and other things shOUld some unions has been cancelled. There- be so adjusted. May I know whether fore, may I know with whom did they that proposal is before the Government? actually hold consultations? Which were the unions whic:h were represented in the SHRI V1DY A CHARAN SHUKLA: I meetina, how many representatives were am not aware of any move that after the there. and what was the percenl8Je of 7 Oral Answers FEBRUARY 21, 1969 Oral Answers 8 railway workers in India who were ~ amr ~ lfVfT ~ l ~ ~ ~ represented? It is not clear that it was really not a representative one because the ~ lfVfT ~ I ~ fttmr if m majority of the workers unions' amr lfVfT ~ ~ ~ ~ •.•.. representatives could not attend? 'Ii\" ~o ~o ifI1m: i3l"1"'f.t lfifT SHRI VIDY A CHARAN SHUKLA: I ~ do not know what is the percentage of railway workers who were represented by the recognised unions and what is the "" ~ ~ : ~~ lfifT ~ percentage of railway workers who are ~ I ~ Wi'f!f;f ~ ~ amr represented by de-recognised unions. If lfVfT .~, ~