Download Public Comments Summary (375 KB
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
General Information Packet City Council Report Agenda Date: 1/17/2019, Item No. 1 Arena Renovation Public Outreach This report provides the City Council a summary of the results of community outreach conducted on the proposed Arena renovations. Summary Based on City Council direction, the Communications Office worked with the Community and Economic Development Department to implement a public outreach process on the proposed Arena renovations. The process involved two main elements - five public meetings held throughout the City, and the creation of an extensive website on the proposed renovations published on www.phoenix.gov. Approximately 300 people attended the five public education meetings and provided 102 comments in total. Most attendees were in favor of the proposed Arena renovation as an economic driver for downtown and part of maintaining a vibrant city. Those opposed were concerned about the use of public funds and some indicated that funds should be used for other city needs. Other main areas of interest at the public meetings included commenters who asked if the City could pursue hockey in downtown Phoenix, questions about if the Suns could pay more of the renovation costs, and how renovation costs were being paid. Additionally, the Arena website and related social media outreach generated a notable amount of community response. The website opened on Thursday, Dec. 20, 2018, and in 26 days, it generated 2,231 visits from interested individuals. Visitors to the website also reviewed the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section 4,143 times, with the top viewed FAQ being: 1. “What about hockey?” 2. “Why is the city paying more than the Suns?” 3. “Why not tear it down and start over?” 4. “Will the Arena be closed during renovations?” There were 71 e-mailed comments sent to the Communications Office via a “comment option” on the website, and two phone calls, with the majority in favor of the proposed Arena renovation. Page 1 of 2 Agenda Date: 1/17/2019, Item No. 1 Staff used popular social media platforms to promote the public education meetings. There were 30 posts on the City’s Twitter account generating impressions of being seen approximately 405,763 times. Staff posted 19 messages on the city’s Facebook page reaching an audience of 33,745. In addition, all five of the public meetings were broadcast on PHXTV and posted on the city’s YouTube channel, generating a total of 847 views. A summary of public meeting comments, phone calls and e-mailed comments is included in this attachment, sorted by date (Attachment A). There were 102 comments in support, 39 comments in opposition and 34 general comments or questions. Comments were current as of Monday, Jan. 14. There was also a comment in support submitted to the court reporter at the public meetings, which is also attached (Attachment B). The meetings and renovation discussion were also extensively covered by news media, generating 103 stories in various broadcast and print news and sports outlets. Most of the pieces came from Associated Press coverage that was picked up both locally and nationally. All totaled, media analytics estimate the stories appeared in publications with a potential audience of more than 26 million readers per month during the public information campaign. This report will also be published on www.phoenix.gov/arena. Concurrence/Previous Council Action Items 29 and 30 were continued from the Dec. 12, 2018 City Council Formal Meeting to provide for the public input process. Responsible Department This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Communications Office. Page 2 of 2 Attachment A RESIDENT COMMENTS SUMMARY TALKING STICK ARENA COMMUNITY MEETINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS, PHONE CALLS AND EMAILS SATURDAY, JANUARY 5, 2019 1. Molly Weiss submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, stating that the venue is a general‐use sports and entertainment venue, which supports many overflow convention center events, and without the arena downtown would become a ghost town. 2. Fred Linsenmeyer submitted a comment in opposition of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, however he noted that he had changed his position when he learned that a tourist tax would be paying for the renovations, and not city of Phoenix taxpayers. 3. Franklin Olivieri submitted a comment requesting a ballot on the general election to have the public vote on the Arena renovation. 4. Alicia Shields submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation because they moved downtown in part because of the sports environment. 5. Chad Lester submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation to keep the Suns here. 6. Anthony Woss submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation as he wants the Suns to stay, as well as other events. 7. Jessica Hipskind submitted a comment card in full support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation. 8. Wesley Harris submitted a comment in opposition to the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, stating he is against city support of private enterprises. 9. Chris Camacho submitted a comment card in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, stating that as the CEO of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) he is supportive of the Arena renovation as it serves as an important anchor in our downtown. 10. Candice Fremouw submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for the Arena renovation, stating that the city of Phoenix cannot afford the liability of not getting it done sooner rather than later. 11. Jeremiah Rojo submitted a comment asking if other professional teams that also utilize the Arena contribute to the renovations to help with the cost. 2 12. Dianne Barker submitted a comment asking if the city has spoken with the Diamondbacks / Maricopa Stadium District about building a unified multi‐purpose sports complex. 13. Karl Gentles submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, stating that it is an important entertainment and cultural center for 30 years. 14. Brent Kleinman submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation and would like to see the lease extended. 15. Patrick Seifter submitted a comment in opposition to the renovation and wanted the money to go for other uses. 16. Silverio Ontiveros submitted a comment card stating he would like the city to require the Suns to have more full‐time jobs and pay a living wage to all employees and contracted workers. 17. Doug Liebman submitted a comment asking for a taxpayer funded study on the Arena renovation to be made public. 18. David Siebenthal submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation. 19. Jade Duran Richardson submitted a comment in opposition to the proposed agreement for Arena renovation and stated she does not approve of her tax dollars going to the Arena when our schools and homeless are ignored. 20. David Berg submitted a comment, asking what will happen to the current practice court area and what the purpose is for the square footage. 21. Darrel Christenson submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, to ensure greater ADA accessibility and compliance with federal laws. 22. Mike Robinson submitted a comment in opposition of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, and that the Suns should be paying for renovations. 23. Mark Goldstein submitted a comment suggesting an alternate funding structure for the Arena renovation, stating that he represents a firm that could provide full financing of the city’s obligations. 24. Boaz Witbeck submitted a comment in opposition of the Arena renovation as an example of corporate welfare. 3 25. R. Kyle Foxcroft submitted a comment, asking how the practice facility location will be chosen, and if an effort will be made revitalize the surrounding area. 26. Chris Coffman submitted a comment in support of the Suns, as a supportive community partner, including their donations in support of nonprofit causes. 27. Andrew Marwick submitted a comment in opposition to the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, stating that the Suns can afford the renovations, and that the funds would be better spent on public safety and public transit. 28. Marcel Mason submitted a comment, asking if there are statistics/data available to report on the city’s expenses to host the All‐Star game, and its return‐on‐investment. 29. Channel Powe submitted a comment in favor of the proposed agreement, stating that she changed her opinion after gathering information at the public meeting, and that buildings need to be updated. She also requested that the city hold additional outreach sessions on the renovation in the community. 30. Paul G. Rowe submitted a comment in opposition to the proposed agreement for the Arena renovation, stating that the role of city government is to provide essential services to its constituents, not subsidize privately owned sports entities. 31. Steve Betts submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for the Arena renovation, as it is a simple landlord/tenant agreement, and that this would be necessary to secure an anchor tenant in private development. 32. Mike Dwyer submitted a comment in opposition to the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, stating that he believes the city needs to divest itself from the building as there is no reason for the city to own it, and that the funds could be used for other purposes. 33. Shana Tompa submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, stating that through partnerships with the Suns the community has been improved. 34. Jeremy Wilhide submitted a comment in support of the proposed agreement for Arena renovation, stating that the Hotel Palomar and their 200 employees benefit from it, and that it generates increased tax revenue.