DOCSLIB.ORG

Ceilometer Instrument Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ceilometer Instrument Handbook DOE/SC-ARM-TR-020 Ceilometer Instrument Handbook VR Morris April 2016 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the U.S. Government. Neither the United States nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. DOE/SC-ARM-TR-020 Ceilometer Instrument Handbook VR Morris, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory April 2016 Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research VR Morris, April 2016, DOE/SC-ARM-TR-020 Acronyms and Abbreviations AGL above ground level AMF ARM Mobil Facility ARM Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility CEIL Ceilometer DOE U.S. Department of Energy DQPR Data Quality Problem Report DQR Data Quality Report ENA Eastern North Atlantic, an ARM site Km kilometer lidar light detection and ranging m meter mm millimeter MOR Meteorological Optical Range MPL Micro Pulse Lidar mrad milliradian nm nanometer ns nanosecond NSA North Slope of Alaska, an ARM site QME Quality Measurement Experiment SGP Southern Great Plains, an ARM megasite VAC volts, alternating current VAP Value-Added Product iii VR Morris, April 2016, DOE/SC-ARM-TR-020 Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 General Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Contacts ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Mentor .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Deployment Locations and History ...................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Near-Real-Time Data Plots .................................................................................................................. 4 5.0 Data Description and Examples ........................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Data File Contents ........................................................................................................................ 5 5.1.1 Primary Variables and Expected Uncertainty ................................................................... 6 5.1.2 Secondary/Underlying Variables ...................................................................................... 7 5.1.3 Diagnostic Variables ......................................................................................................... 7 5.1.4 Data Quality Flags ............................................................................................................. 8 5.1.5 Dimension Variables ......................................................................................................... 9 5.2 User Notes and Known Problems .............................................................................................. 10 5.3 Frequently Asked Questions ...................................................................................................... 10 6.0 Data Quality ........................................................................................................................................ 11 6.1 Data Quality Health and Status .................................................................................................. 11 6.2 Data Reviews by Instrument Mentor.......................................................................................... 11 6.3 Data Assessments by Site Scientist / Data Quality Office ......................................................... 12 6.4 Value-Added Procedures and Quality Measurement Experiments ............................................ 12 7.0 Instrument Details............................................................................................................................... 13 7.1 Detailed Description ................................................................................................................... 13 7.1.1 List of Components ......................................................................................................... 13 7.1.2 System Configuration and Measurement Methods ......................................................... 13 7.1.3 Specifications .................................................................................................................. 15 7.2 Theory of Operation ................................................................................................................... 15 7.3 Calibration .................................................................................................................................. 17 7.3.1 Theory ............................................................................................................................. 17 7.3.2 Procedures ....................................................................................................................... 18 7.3.3 History ............................................................................................................................. 18 7.4 Operation and Maintenance ....................................................................................................... 18 7.4.1 User Manual .................................................................................................................... 18 7.4.2 Routine and Corrective Maintenance Documentation .................................................... 18 7.4.3 Software Documentation ................................................................................................. 19 7.5 Glossary ...................................................................................................................................... 19 iv VR Morris, April 2016, DOE/SC-ARM-TR-020 7.6 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... 19 7.7 Citable References...................................................................................................................... 19 Figures 1. CL-View cloud intensity graph (0 – 25500 ft AGL). ................................................................... 5 Tables 1. History of deployment locations. .................................................................................................. 2 2. Primary variables. ......................................................................................................................... 6 3. Secondary variables. ..................................................................................................................... 7 4. Diagnostic variables. ..................................................................................................................... 7 5. Data quality flags. ......................................................................................................................... 8 6. Data quality thresholds. ................................................................................................................ 8 7. Time quality flags. ........................................................................................................................ 9 8. Dimension variables. .................................................................................................................... 9 9. Vaisala CL31 main parts. .............................................................................................................. 13 10. Vaisala CL31 configuration settings. ............................................................................................ 14 11. Specifications of CL31 ceilometer, as operated at ARM sites. .................................................... 15 v VR Morris, April 2016, DOE/SC-ARM-TR-020 1.0 General Overview The Vaisala Laser Ceilometer (CEIL) is a self-contained, ground-based, active, remote-sensing device designed to measure cloud-base height, vertical visibility, and potential backscatter signals by aerosols. It detects up to three cloud layers simultaneously. Model CL31 has a maximum vertical range of 7700 meters (m). The laser ceilometer transmits near-infrared pulses of light, and the receiver detects the light scattered back by clouds and precipitation. 2.0 Contacts 2.1 Mentor Victor Morris Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999, MS K9-24 Richland, WA 99352 Phone: 09-372-6144 E-mail: [email protected] 3.0 Deployment Locations and History The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)’s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility currently operates a total of six laser ceilometers at its fixed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geometric Characteristics of Clouds from Ceilometer Measurements and Radiosounding Methods
    GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CLOUDS FROM CEILOMETER MEASUREMENTS AND RADIOSOUNDING METHODS Montserrat Costa Surós Dipòsit legal: Gi. 1888-2014 http://hdl.handle.net/10803/284084 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ca Aquesta obra està subjecta a una llicència Creative Commons Reconeixement Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution licence GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CLOUDS FROM CEILOMETER MEASUREMENTS AND RADIOSOUNDING METHODS DOCTORAL THESIS Montserrat Costa Surós 2014 DOCTORAL THESIS GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CLOUDS FROM CEILOMETER MEASUREMENTS AND RADIOSOUNDING METHODS Montserrat Costa Surós 2014 Doctoral Programme in Experimental Sciences and Sustainability Supervisors: Josep Calbó Angrill José Abel González Gutiérrez Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by the University of Girona El Dr. Josep Calbó Angrill i el Dr. José Abel González Gutiérrez, professors titulars del Departament de Física de la Universitat de Girona, CERTIFIQUEN: Que aquest treball, titulat “Geometric characteristics of clouds from ceilometer measurements and radiosounding methods”, que presenta la Montserrat Costa Surós per a l’obtenció del títol de doctora, ha estat realitzat sota la seva direcció. I, perquè així consti i tingui els efectes oportuns, signen aquest document. Dr. Josep Calbó Angrill Dr. José Abel González Gutiérrez Girona, 29 de juliol de 2014. Un esforç total és una victòria completa M. Ghandi Acknowledgments First and the most important I would like to thank my supervisors Dr. Josep Calbó and Dr. Josep- Abel González for giving me the opportunity to begin my research career with them, which has led to this doctoral thesis, and for their guidance and support during these years.
    [Show full text]
  • LIDAR RTH Collis Stanford Research Institute ABSTRACT Lidar Is An
    LIDAR R. T. H. Collis Stanford Research Institute ABSTRACT Lidar is an optical 'radar' technique employing laser energy. Variations in signal intensity as a function of range provide information on atmospheric constituents, even when these are too tenuous to be normally visible. The theoretical and technical basis of the technique is described and typical values of the atmospheric optical parameters given. The significance of these parameters to atmospheric and meteorological problems is discussed. While the basic technique can provide valuable informa- tion about clouds and other material in the atmosphere, it is not possible to determine particle size and number concentrations precisely. There are also inherent diffi- culties in evaluating lidar observations. Nevertheless, lidar can provide much useful information as is shown by illustrations. These include lidar observations of: cirrus cloud, showing mountain wave motions; stratification in 'clear' air due to the thermal profile near the ground; determinations of low cloud and 'visibility' along an air- field approach path; and finally the motion and internal structure of clouds of tracer materials (insecticide spray and explosion-caused dust) which demonstrate the use of lidar for studying transport and diffusion processes. Lidar is a generic, rather than a specific, technique and thus can be applied in a variety of forms to a wide range of research and operational problems. Research applications include: the investigation of dust in the high atmosphere; studies of air motion and turbulence revealed by cirrus and other clouds; boundary layer phenomena, as shown by variations in turbidity in the mixing layer; turbu- lence and diffusion processes using suitable indicators; and investigations of the effects of cirrus and other particulate 147 LIDAR layers on measurement of radiation in and through the earth's atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Clouds, Precipitation and Their Remote Sensing Intergovernmental
    25.09.12 Clouds, Precipitation and their Remote Sensing Prof. Susanne Crewell AG Integrated Remote Sensing Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology University of Cologne Susanne Crewell, Kompaktkurs, Jülich24. 25 September September 2012 2012 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) www.ipcc.ch Nobel price 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (FAR), 2007: "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal", and "Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations". Aerosols, clouds and their interaction with climate is still the most uncertain area of climate change and require multidisciplinary coordinated research efforts. SusanneSusS sanna ne Crewell,Crewewellelll,K, Kompaktkurs,Kompakta kurs, JülichJülJüü ichchc 252 SeptemberSSeeptetetembembber 201220121 1 25.09.12 Why are clouds so complex? Cloud microphysical processes occur on small spatial scales and need to be parametrized in atmospheric models Cloud microphysics is strongly connected to other sub-grid scale processes (turbulence, radiation) Cloud droplets 0.01 mm diameter 100-1000 per cm3 Condensation nuclei Drizzle droplets 0.001 mm diameter 0.1 mm diameter 1000 per cm3 1 per cm3 Rain drops ca. 1 mm diameter, 1 drops per liter Susannesa Crewell, Kompaktkurs, Jülich 25 September 2012 Why are clouds so complex? From hydrometeors to single clouds to Einzelwolken to the global and cloud fields system Susanne Crewell, Kompaktkurs, Jülich 25 September
    [Show full text]
  • Rightsizing Project Nextgen IOC Sensor Assessment Summary AJP
    RightSizing Project NextGen IOC Sensor Assessment Summary AJP-6830 1 of 64 December 1, 2009 RightSizing Project NextGen IOC Sensor Assessment Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Context and Motivation .....................................................................................................4 1.1.1 NextGen ......................................................................................................................4 1.1.2 4D weather cube ........................................................................................................4 1.1.3 Weather observation and forecast requirements to meet NextGen goals .................5 1.2 RightSizing Project Goals ....................................................................................................6 1.2.1 Assessment of Sensor Network ..................................................................................7 1.2.2 Identification of gaps based on functional and performance requirements ..............8 1.2.3 Development of master plan to meet NextGen weather observation requirements .8 1.3 Scope of this Report (FY 2009) ...........................................................................................8 2 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULE ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pitch Angle Dependence of Energetic Electron Precipitation: Energy
    Confidential manuscript submitted to JGR 1 Pitch Angle Dependence of Energetic Electron Precipitation: 2 Energy Deposition, Backscatter, and the Bounce Loss Cone 1 2 3 R. A. Marshall and J. Bortnik 1 4 Ann and H. J. Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 5 80309, USA. 2 6 Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 7 Key Points: • 8 We characterize energy deposition and atmospheric backscatter of radiation belt 9 electrons as a function of energy and pitch angle • 10 We use these simulations to characterize the bounce loss cone and show that it is 11 energy dependent • 12 The simulated backscatter of precipitation is characterized by field aligned beams 13 of low energies which should be observable Corresponding author: R. A. Marshall, [email protected] –1– Confidential manuscript submitted to JGR 14 Abstract 15 Quantifying radiation belt precipitation and its consequent atmospheric effects re- 16 quires an accurate assessment of the pitch angle distribution of precipitating electrons, as 17 well as knowledge of the dependence of the atmospheric deposition on that distribution. 18 Here, Monte Carlo simulations are used to investigate the effects of the incident electron 19 energy and pitch angle on precipitation for bounce-period time scales, and the implica- 20 tions for both the loss from the radiation belts and the deposition in the upper atmosphere. 21 Simulations are conducted at discrete energies and pitch angles to assess the dependence 22 on these parameters of the atmospheric energy deposition profiles and to estimate the 23 backscattered particle distributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Observations
    Operational Weather Analysis … www.wxonline.info Chapter 2 Weather Observations Weather observations are the basic ingredients of weather analysis. These observations define the current state of the atmosphere, serve as the basis for isoline patterns, and provide a means for determining the physical processes that occur in the atmosphere. A working knowledge of the observation process is an important part of weather analysis. Source-Based Observation Classification Weather parameters are determined directly by human observation, by instruments, or by a combination of both. Human-based Parameters : Traditionally the human eye has been the source of various weather parameters. For example, the amount of cloud that covers the sky, the type of precipitation, or horizontal visibility, has been based on human observation. Instrument-based Parameters : Numerous instruments have been developed over the years to sense a variety of weather parameters. Some of these instruments directly observe a particular weather parameter at the location of the instrument. The measurement of air temperature by a thermometer is an excellent example of a direct measurement. Other instruments observe data remotely. These instruments either passively sense radiation coming from a location or actively send radiation into an area and interpret the radiation returned to the instrument. Satellite data for visible and infrared imagery are examples of the former while weather radar is an example of the latter. Hybrid Parameters : Hybrid observations refer to weather parameters that are read by a human observer from an instrument. This approach to collecting weather data has been a big part of the weather observing process for many years. Proper sensing of atmospheric data requires proper siting of the sensors.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2 the Forecast Icing Potential (Fip) Algorithm
    3.2 THE FORECAST ICING POTENTIAL (FIP) ALGORITHM Frank McDonough *, Ben C. Bernstein, Marcia K. Politovich, and Cory A. Wolff National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 1. Introduction The 70% threshold was chosen to allow for expected model moisture errors and to allow for In-flight icing is a serious hazard to the cold clouds to be found without a model forecast aviation community. It occurs when subfreezing of water saturation. The use of a combination of liquid cloud and/or precipitation droplets freeze to relative humidity with respect to both water and ice the exposed surfaces of an aircraft in flight. Icing may allow for the use of a higher threshold in conditions can occur on large scales or in small future versions of FIP. volumes where conditions may change quickly. Cloud base is found by working upward in the Because of the nature of icing conditions, the need same column until the first level with RH≥80% is for a forecast product with high spatial and found. Since the model boundary layer often has temporal resolution is apparent. RH>80%, even in cloud-free air, FIP begins its The FIP (Forecast Icing Potential) algorithm search for a cloud base at 1000ft (305m) AGL. was developed at the National Center for The threshold of 80% for cloud base identification Atmospheric Research under the Federal Aviation is used to also allow for model moisture errors and Administration’s Aviation Weather Research the expectation that cloud base is found at warmer Program. It uses 20-km resolution Rapid Update temperatures where RH and RHi are more Cycle (RUC) model output to determine the equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTTP) Climatic Data for May 2015 Use in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide(MEPDG) Calibration 6
    Evaluation of LTPP Climatic Data for Use in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Calibration and Other Pavement Analysis PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-HRT-15-019 MAY 2015 Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 FOREWORD This document presents the results of an evaluation of climate data from Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) for use in the Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Program and for other infrastructure applications. MERRA data were compared against the best available ground-based observations both statistically and in terms of effects on pavement performance as predicted using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). These analyses included a systematic quantitative evaluation of the sensitivity of MEPDG performance predictions to variations in fundamental climate parameters. A more extensive analysis of MERRA data included additional statistical analysis comparing operating weather station (OWS) and MERRA data, evaluation of the correctness of MEPDG surface shortwave radiation (SSR) calculations and comparison of MEPDG pavement performance predictions using OWS and MERRA climate data for more sections. The principal conclusion from these evaluations was that the MERRA climate data were as good as and in many cases substantially better than equivalent ground-based OWSs. MERRA is strongly recommended as the new future source for climate data in LTPP. Recommendations are provided for incorporating hourly MERRA data into the LTPP database. The LTPP program is an ongoing and active program. To obtain current information and access to other technical references, LTPP data users should visit the LTPP Web site at http://www.tfhrc.gov/pavement/ltpp/ltpp.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • VIIRS Cloud Base Height Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD)
    Effective Date: April 22, 2011 Revision - GSFC JPSS CMO December 5, 2011 Released Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Ground Project Code 474 474-00045 Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) VIIRS Cloud Base Height Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) For Public Release The information provided herein does not contain technical data as defined in the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) 22 CFC 120.10. This document has been approved For Public Release to the NOAA Comprehensive Large Array-data Stewardship System (CLASS). Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland National Aeronautics and Space Administration Check the JPSS MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use. JPSS VIIRS Cloud Base Height ATBD 474-00045 Effective Date: April 22, 2011 Revision - This page intentionally left blank. Check the JPSS MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use. JPSS VIIRS Cloud Base Height ATBD 474-00045 Effective Date: April 22, 2011 Revision - Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) VIIRS Cloud Base Height Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) JPSS Electronic Signature Page Prepared By: Neal Baker JPSS Data Products and Algorithms, Senior Engineering Advisor (Electronic Approvals available online at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/mainmenu_dsp.cfm ) Approved By: Heather Kilcoyne DPA Manager (Electronic Approvals available online at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/mainmenu_dsp.cfm ) Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland i Check the JPSS MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.
    [Show full text]
  • A Layman's Interpretation Guide L-Band and C-Band Synthetic
    A Layman’s Interpretation Guide to L-band and C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar data Version 2.0 15 November, 2018 Table of Contents 1 About this guide .................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Briefly about Synthetic Aperture Radar ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 The radar wavelength .................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Polarisation ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Radar backscatter ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.3.1 Sigma-nought .................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.3.2 Gamma-nought ............................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Backscatter mechanisms .............................................................................................................. 4 2.4.1 Direct backscatter ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.4.2 Forward scattering ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulus Humulis Aerosol Process Study
    OVERVIEW OF THE CUMULUS HUMILIS AEROSOL PROCESSING STUDY BY LARRY K. BERG, CARL M. BERKOWITZ, JOHN A. OGREN, CHRIS A. HOSTETLER, RICHARD A. FERRARE, MANVENDRA K. DUBEY, ELISABETH ANDREWS, RICHARD L. COULTER, JOHNATHAN W. HAIR, JOHN M. HUBBE, YIN-NAN LEE, CLAUDIO MAZZOLENI* JASON OLFERT\ AND STEPHEN R. SPRINGSTON During the summer of 2007, CHAPS investigated changes in the chemical and optical properties of aerosols due to their interaction with shallow cumuli. erosols influence climate directly by scattering framework, the Cumulus Humilis Aerosol Processing and absorbing radiation and indirectly through Study (CHAPS) is a stage 1 activity, that is, a detailed Atheir influence on cloud microphysical and process study. The specific focus of CHAPS was to dynamical properties. The Intergovernmental Panel provide concurrent observations of the chemical com- on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that the global position of the activated [particles that are currently radiative forcing due to aerosols is large and in gen- serving as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)] and eral cools the planet (Forster et al. 2007). But the nonactivated aerosols, the scattering and extinction uncertainties in these estimates are also large due to profiles, and detailed aerosol and droplet size spectra our poor understanding of many of the important in the vicinity of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, during processes related to aerosols and clouds. To address June 2007. this uncertainty, Ghan and Schwartz (2007) proposed Numerous campaigns have examined aerosol an integrated strategy for addressing issues related to properties downwind from large pollution sources, aerosols and aerosol processes. Using this conceptual including the Megacity Initiative: Local and Global AFFILIATIONS: BERG, BERKOWITZ, AND HUBBE—Pacific Northwest "CURRENT AFFILIATION: The University of Alberta, National Laboratory, Richland, Washington; OGREN—NOAA Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado; HOSTETLER, CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Dual Polarization Upgrade On
    Prospects of Cloud Volume Imaging with the WSR-88D Radar Valery Melnikov* David Mechem+ Phillip Chilson~ Richard Doviak# Dusan Zrnic# Yefim Kogan* *CIMMS, University of Oklahoma +Dept. Of Geography, University of Kansas #National Severe Storms Laboratory, OAR ~School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma [email protected] ARM Science Team Meeting, 1 April 2009 1 Motivation Observational sampling of 3D cloud fields has been a longstanding goal of ARM. Cloud fields required for 3D radiative transfer calculations Evaluation/formulation of overlap assumptions for statistical cloud schemes The 157 WSR-88D weather radar sites exhibit a wide range of climatic regimes Challenges Scanning radars can deliver 3D fields in real time. Can the WSR-88D weather radar be used for 3D cloud sounding? Reflectivities of -25...-30 dBZ @ 10 km should be measured with a radar to robustly detect clouds. Can this sensitivity be achieved on the WSR-88D? Can the WSR-88D radars be used in cloud sounding? Volume Coverage Patterns (VCP) of the WSR-88Ds “CLOUD” VCP of KOUN 3 Sensitivity of KOUN with enhanced signal processing. Radar RHIs correspond to the vertical black lines in the pictures 4 Cirrus clouds: pictures of clouds, visible satellite, WSR-88D KTLX, and KOUN images 5 Comparison of sensitivity difference KOUN cloud mode KOUN precip mode 6 Comparison of radar parameters ARM ARM NASA NOAA WSR- MMCR WACR CPR 88D Wavelength, mm 8 3 3 109 Antenna beamwidth, deg 0.2 0.24 0.12 0.96 Radial resolution, m 45/90 45 500 250 Two-way transversal 17@10 km 29@10 km 1400 x 82@10 km resolution, m 2500 Z10 , dBZ -30 (general -26 -26 -25.5 short pulse mode) -33 long pulse Attenuation Strong Severe Severe Negligible Number of systems 5 3 1 157 7 Examples of multi-layer and multi-phase clouds.
    [Show full text]