Proquest Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proquest Dissertations INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy subm itted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMf Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Artxjr, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 NEGOTIATING IDENTITY: BERTHA PAPPENHEIM (ANNA O.) AS GERMAN-JEWISH FEMINIST, SOCIAL WORKER, ACTIVIST, AND AUTHOR DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Elizabeth Ann Loentz, M. A. ***** The Ohio State University 1999 Approved by Dissertation Committee: Professor Dagmar C.G. Lorenz, Adviser (j Adviser 0 Professor Helen Fehervary, Adviser Adviser Professor Barbara Becker-Cantarino Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures UMI Number: 9941374 Copyright 1999 by Loentz, Elizabeth Ann All rights reserved. UMI Microform 9941374 Copyright 1999, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Copyright by Elizabeth Ann Loentz 1999 ABSTRACT Since Ernest Jones revealed the identity of "Anna O." in his 1953 Freud biography, scholars have been more interested in "Anna O," the object of study for the two "founding fathers" of modem psychology, than in Bertha Pappenheim, the author, feminist, activist, and pioneering social worker. The majority of studies of Pappenheim (1859-1936) have focused on her role as the hysteric patient "Anna O." in Freud and Breuer's Studien über Hysterie. Few works have been dedicated to her later achievements as the founder of the Jewish German Women's League and as world-renowned social worker and activist, and almost none to her literary writings. My dissertation redirects attention to Pappenheim's long neglected, yet very extensive literary work, which includes dramas, short stories, parables, aphorisms, a travelogue, poems, prayers, and literary translations. Pappenheim's multi-faceted identity, or in other terms, the necessity of "negotiating" between numerous competing or seemingly incompatible self- identifications and/or externally imposed identifications (Vieimese, Austro-German, Orthodox Jewish, upper-middle-class, feminist, social worker, single woman, anti- Zionist, recovered hysteric), leads to paradoxes and ambivalence both in her writings and in her personal life and public activism. My project, which is informed by recent ii theoretical discussions of identity issues in Cultural Studies, Ethnic and Area Studies, Minority Studies, and Women's and Gender Studies, examines the relationship between Pappenheim's literary work and her social work and activism, endeavoring to unpack these moments of apparent contradiction. I examine recurring themes in Pappenheim's work (the status of Yiddish, anti-Zionism, conversion and Catholicism, Eastern European Jewry, women's role in Orthodox Judaism) all of which revolve around and point back to Pappenheim's steadfast insistence on the ideal of German-Jewish symbiosis. The symbiosis Pappenheim avowed, a "culturally German and religiously Jewish" identity, was tenuous throughout Pappenheim's lifetime, at odds with the increasingly dominant nationalist-racist discourse, that reduced religion, language, and culture to racial attributes. In her final years, however, the institutionalized anti-Semitism of National Socialism legally annulled the symbiosis, non-negotiably. For Pappenheim, the symbiosis was equally non-negotiable. At her advanced age, she was unwilling and unable to part with the keystone of her self-understanding and foundation of her life's work. Ill Dedicated to my mother Evelyn Ann Ganas IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my adviser and mentor, Dagmar C.G. Lorenz, for her guidance, support, and encouragement - intellectually, professionally, and personally - throughout the dissertation. I extend my thanks also to Barbara Becker-Cantarino and Helen Fehervary (Co-Adviser), members of my dissertation committee, for their thoughtful readings of my work and their insightful critiques and suggestions. I am grateful to the Leo Baeck Institute (Fritz Halber's Fellowship in German Jewish History and Culture) and the Graduate School of The Ohio State University (Graduate Alumni Research Award) for their generous support of my research travel; to the Graduate School, for the Presidential Fellowship, which allowed me to devote an entire academic year exclusively to the dissertation; and to the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures and the Melton Center for Jewish Studies, whose travel grants enabled me to present my work-in-progress at professional conferences, where I received valuable feed-back from other conference participants. I am indebted also to Diane R. Spielmann of the Leo Baeck Institute, Helga Heubach and Herr Kuhn of the Bertha Pappenheim Gedenkstatte, Michael Lenarz of the Jüdisches Museum of Frankfurt am Main, Frau Wilke of the Institut fur Stadtgeschichte of Frankfurt am Main, Christa Wille of ARIADNE, Rachel Heuberger at the Judaica Abteilung of the Stadt- und Universitatsmuseum of Frankfurt, the librarians and archivists who patiently guided me through the collections of the Bibliothek des Jüdischen Museums in Vienna, the Zentrum fur Antisemitismusforschung of the Technische Universitat Berlin, the Bibliothek Germania Judaica of Kola, the Landesarchiv Berlin, and the other libraries, archives, and research institutions that I visited through the course of this project. I wish also to express my gratitude to the faculty and graduate students in the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures, who have discussed my project with me throughout its development and have been generous with advice, support, and encouragement. I am especially grateful to the faculty members in Yiddish, who have encouraged me to view Pappenheim not only through the lense of German Jewish literature and culture but in the broader context of Askenazic Jewry. Finally, my heartfelt appreciation goes out to my family and friends, near and far, especially to my mother, Evelyn, my mother-in-law and father-and-law, Christa and Erich, and most of all my husband Wolfgang, for their loving and generous support in all of my endeavors. VI VITA 1992 B.A. German,cum laude. University of Pennsylvania 1992 M.A. Germanic Languages and Literatures, University of Pennsylvania 1992-1993 Teacher of German as Second Language, Haus Chevalier; Clearing-House for Unaccompanied Minor-Aged Refugees, Hallbergmoos, Germany 1993 - present Graduate Associate, The Ohio State University FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Germanic Languages and Literatures VII TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract........................................................................................................................................ü Dedication.................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................... v V ita............................................................................................................................................vii Chapters: 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................1 2. Between Nostalgia and Denial: Bertha Pappenheim on Yiddish................................................................................ 26 3. "Even Palestine is Golus and Diaspora": Bertha Pappenheim as Jewish Anti-Zionist............................................................ 66 4. Catholicism as a Model for German-Jewish Symbiosis?: Bertha Pappenheim on Conversion....................................................................... 102 5. From Brothel to Beth Jacob: Bertha Pappenheim on Eastern European Jewish Women....................................137 6. "Orthodox" Judaism on her own Terms: From "not at all religious" Anna O to Spiritual Mother of Jewish-German W omen.................................................... 182 7. Conclusion..................................................................................................................232 Bibliography ..........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Introducing the Statutory Duty of Candour Consultation
    Introducing the Statutory Duty of Candour A consultation on proposals to introduce a new CQC registration regulation March 2014 Title: Introducing the Statutory Duty of Candour Author: Strategy and External Relations Directorate/ Quality Regulation/ 17160 Document Purpose: Consultation Publication date: March 2014 Target audience: Department of Health Arm’s Length Bodies Providers of healthcare and adult social care registered with the Care Quality Commission The General Public Contact details: Jeremy Nolan Quarry House 2E11 0113 254 6573 [email protected] You may re-use the text of this document (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ © Crown copyright Published to gov.uk, in PDF format only. www.gov.uk/dh 2 Introducing the Statutory Duty of Candour A consultation on proposals to introduce a new CQC registration regulation Prepared by the Department of Health 3 Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6 2. Previous Reviews and Consultations .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geographischer Index
    2 Gerhard-Mercator-Universität Duisburg FB 1 – Jüdische Studien DFG-Projekt "Rabbinat" Prof. Dr. Michael Brocke Carsten Wilke Geographischer und quellenkundlicher Index zur Geschichte der Rabbinate im deutschen Sprachgebiet 1780-1918 mit Beiträgen von Andreas Brämer Duisburg, im Juni 1999 3 Als Dokumente zur äußeren Organisation des Rabbinats besitzen wir aus den meisten deutschen Staaten des 19. Jahrhunderts weder statistische Aufstellungen noch ein zusammenhängendes offizielles Aktenkorpus, wie es für Frankreich etwa in den Archiven des Zentralkonsistoriums vorliegt; die For- schungslage stellt sich als ein fragmentarisches Mosaik von Lokalgeschichten dar. Es braucht nun nicht eigens betont zu werden, daß in Ermangelung einer auch nur ungefähren Vorstellung von Anzahl, geo- graphischer Verteilung und Rechtstatus der Rabbinate das historische Wissen schwerlich über isolierte Detailkenntnisse hinausgelangen kann. Für die im Rahmen des DFG-Projekts durchgeführten Studien erwies es sich deswegen als erforderlich, zur Rabbinatsgeschichte im umfassenden deutschen Kontext einen Index zu erstellen, der möglichst vielfältige Daten zu den folgenden Rubriken erfassen soll: 1. gesetzliche, administrative und organisatorische Rahmenbedingungen der rabbinischen Amts- ausübung in den Einzelstaaten, 2. Anzahl, Sitz und territoriale Zuständigkeit der Rabbinate unter Berücksichtigung der histori- schen Veränderungen, 3. Reihenfolge der jeweiligen Titulare mit Lebens- und Amtsdaten, 4. juristische und historische Sekundärliteratur, 5. erhaltenes Aktenmaterial
    [Show full text]
  • 1332/4/12/19 Tobii AB (Publ) V Competition and Markets Authority
    Neutral citation [2019] CAT 25 IN THE COMPETITION Case No: 1332/4/12/19 APPEAL TRIBUNAL Victoria House 25 October 2019 Bloomsbury Place London WC1A 2EB Before: HODGE MALEK Q.C. Chairman Sitting as a Tribunal in England and Wales BETWEEN: TOBII AB (PUBL) Applicant - v - COMPETITION AND MARKETS AUTHORITY Respondent RULING (SPECIFIC DISCLOSURE) A. INTRODUCTION 1. The Applicant (“Tobii”) filed an application on 16 October 2019 for an order under Rule 19(1) and 19(2)(p) of the Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015 (S.I. 2015 No. 1648) (the “2015 Tribunal Rules”) for specific disclosure from the Respondent (the “CMA”) (the “Disclosure Application”), pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Order of the Chairman dated 3 October 2019 made at the case management conference. 2. The Disclosure Application is made in the context of Tobii’s application of 13 September 2019 for judicial review pursuant to s.120 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (the “2002 Act”) of decisions in the CMA’s final report dated 15 August 2019 regarding the completed acquisition by Tobii of Smartbox Assistive Technologies Limited and Sensory Software International Limited (together, “Smartbox”) (the “Final Report”). The CMA’s decisions in the Final Report are summarised at paragraph 5 of the Tribunal’s ruling of 10 October 2019 regarding the admissibility of evidence [2019] CAT 23. The judicial review application (the “s.120 Application”) is due to be heard on 6 November 2019 with an estimate of two days. 3. This is my ruling on Tobii’s Disclosure Application, having received written submissions from both parties and deciding the Disclosure Application on the papers.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES English Department Hasidic Judaism in American Literature by Eva van Loenen Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF YOUR HUMANITIES English Department Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy HASIDIC JUDAISM IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Eva Maria van Loenen This thesis brings together literary texts that portray Hasidic Judaism in Jewish-American literature, predominantly of the 20th and 21st centuries. Although other scholars may have studied Rabbi Nachman, I.B. Singer, Chaim Potok and Pearl Abraham individually, no one has combined their works and examined the depiction of Hasidism through the codes and conventions of different literary genres. Additionally, my research on Judy Brown and Frieda Vizel raises urgent questions about the gendered foundations of Hasidism that are largely elided in the earlier texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating the Duty of Loyalty Into the Model Code of Conduct
    Dalhousie Law Journal Volume 39 Issue 1 Article 2 4-1-2016 Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating the Duty of Loyalty into the Model Code of Conduct Colin Jackson Dalhousie University Richard Devlin Dalhousie University Brent Cotter University of Saskatchewan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj Part of the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Colin Jackson, Richard Devlin, and Brent Cotter, "Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating the Duty of Loyalty into the Model Code of Conduct" (2016) 39:1 Dal LJ 37. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dalhousie Law Journal by an authorized editor of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Colin Jackson* Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating Richard Devlin** and the Duty of Loyalty into the Model Code Brent Cotter *** of Conduct The "conflicts quartet" of cases decided by the Supreme Court of Canada can be understood as part of a long-standing tension in Anglo-Canadian jurisprudence between two competing conceptions of a lawyer's professional identity In the most recent of these cases, C.N. Railway v. McKercher, the Supreme Court conclusively preferred the loyalty-centred conception of the practice of law over the entrepreneurial conception. While the Federation of Law Societies of Canada amended its Model Code of Professional Conduct in 2014 in response to the Supreme Court's decision in McKercher, this article argues that those amendments did not go far enough. The authors propose a more substantial set of modifications to the Model Code to better entrench the duty of loyalty as a foundational principle of legal ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • V4 EH JEG Duty of Candour Policy for Execs Septmber 2019
    Duty of Candour Policy Document type: Policy Version: 4 Author (name): Emily Harrison Author (designation): Clinical Risk Manager Validated by Procedural Document Oversight Committee Date validated 14th August 2019 Ratified by: Executive Directors Date ratified: 2nd September 2019 Name of responsible committee/individual: Clinical Governance & Quality Committee Name of Executive Lead (for policies only) Trish Armstrong-Child, Director of Nursing Master Document Controller: Governance Support Co-ordinator Date uploaded to intranet: Key words Being Open, Duty of Candour, Candour, incident, investigation Review date: August 2022 Version control Version Type of Change Date Revisions from previous issues 1 New Policy May 2015 2 To emphasise the July 2016 Figure 1, the boxes for ‘Offer Meeting’ and ‘Send need for a meeting an apology letter with the findings’ have been or conversation to swopped around. share the findings Paragraph 15 has been amended to highlight the with the patient or need to talk to the patient / family prior to sending family. an apology with the findings. Paragraph 18 has an additional line to emphasise To emphasise that that the authority for an exemption for Duty of authority for Candour comes from the Director of Nursing, exemptions can Medical Director or Deputy Director of Nursing only come from the Version 4 Policy Duty of Candour Policy Reviewed By: Page 1 of 21 Date July 2019 Next Review Date August 2022 E. Harrison, Clinical Risk Manager Director of Nursing, Paragraph 40 has been amended to clarify that the Medical Director or initial approach for an exemption is made to the Deputy Director of Clinical Risk Manager, or Head of Governance, Nursing.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Discharging the Duty of Candour And
    Guidance on Discharging the Duty of Candour and Disclosure in Judicial Review Proceedings Treasury Solicitor's Department One Kemble Street London WC2B 4TS January 2010 Guidance on Discharging the Duty of Candour and Disclosure in Judicial Review Proceedings Introduction What this guidance is for This is practical guidance addressed to departments and litigation case handlers intended to help you to discharge your duty as a public servant to assist the court with full and accurate explanations of all the facts relevant to the issue the court must decide. This guidance applies to judicial review (JR) proceedings and sets out the law and standards applicable: (a) in discharging the duty of candour (see paragraph 1.2 below), and (b) in giving disclosure under CPR Part 31 in those rare instances where it is ordered in JR proceedings, or is appropriate in the proceedings because resolution of disputed issues of fact is central to the outcome of the proceedings (for example, where the claim is that there has been a breach of the substantive obligation under ECHR Article 2 or Article 3) (see paragraph 1.4). This guidance does not apply to other forms of civil proceedings, although the principles set out here may have generic relevance to Standard Disclosure under Part 31 CPR in such cases, Norwich Pharmacal orders, applications for specific discovery and to inquests and inquiries. This guidance does not apply to criminal cases. Nor is it concerned with requests for information under the Data Protection Act 1998, the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or the Environmental information Regulations 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating the Duty of Loyalty Into the Model Code of Conduct Richard Devlin Colin Jackson Brent Cotter
    Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Richard Devlin, FRSC 2016 Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating the Duty of Loyalty into the Model Code of Conduct Richard Devlin Colin Jackson Brent Cotter Available at: https://works.bepress.com/richard-devlin/1/ DALHOUSIE LAW JOURNAL LAW DALHOUSIE DALHOUSIEDALHOUSIE LAWLAW JOURNALJOURNAL Volume 39 Number 1 Spring 2016 Death to Semelhago! Bruce Ziff Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating the Duty of Loyalty into the Model Code of Conduct Colin Jackson, Richard Devlin & Brent Cotter Nom de Plume: Who Writes the Supreme Court’s “By the Court” Judgments? Peter McCormick Limiting the Legal Liability of Religious Institutions for their Clergy: Cavanaugh v. Grenville Christian College M.H. Ogilvie Agonizing Identity in Mental Health Law and Policy (Part II): A Political Taxonomy of Psychiatric Subjectification Sheila Wildeman High Freshets and Low-Lying Farms: Property Law and St. John River Flooding in Colonial New Brunswick Jason Hall Doctoral Studies in Law: From the Inside Out Dia Dabby, Bethany Hastie & Jocelyn Stacey Public Institutions as Defamation Plaintiffs Hilary Young Legal Barriers to Age Discrimination in Hiring Complaints Pnina Alon-Shenker Not Ideas of the Thing but the Thing Itself: Imagining a Support Group for Separated and Divorced Fathers as a Site of Legal Education 87 Thomas McMorrow Book Review Canadian Perspectives on Animals and the Law Sabrina Trembley-Huet Colin Jackson* Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating Richard Devlin** and the Duty of Loyalty into the Model Code Brent Cotter *** of Conduct The “conflicts quartet” of cases decided by the Supreme Court of Canada can be understood as part of a long-standing tension in Anglo-Canadian jurisprudence between two competing conceptions of a lawyer’s professional identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Disclosure in Clinical Practice
    INFORMATION DISCLOSURE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: A LEGAL, ETHICAL AND PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of PhD in Bioethics and Medical Jurisprudence in the Faculty of Humanities School of Law Kate Zubairu 2013 Contents Contents 2 Abstract 6 Declaration 7 Copyright Statement 8 Dedication 9 Acknowledgements 10 The Author 11 Conference Presentations 11 List of Papers 12 Table of Cases 13 Table of Statutes 13 PART ONE: INTRODUCTION Chapter One: Posing the problem 14 1.1 Research question and rationale 14 1.2 The problem 15 1.3 Methodology 17 1.4 The nursing perspective 18 1.5 Outline of thesis 22 Chapter Two: Ethical and contextual background 24 2.1 Context 24 2.2 From paternalism to autonomy 26 2.3 Autonomy 27 2.4 Criticism of respect for patient autonomy 28 2.5 Patient information preferences 31 2.6 Trust 32 2.7 Non-disclosure of information 36 2.8 Truth-telling and hope 40 2.9 Conclusion 41 Chapter Three: Philosophical approach 42 3.1 Virtue ethics 42 3.2 The importance of recognising emotions in ethical decision-making 43 3.3 Deontology 46 3.4 Consequentialism 48 ! 2! 3.5 Criticisms of virtue ethics 51 3.6 Lack of action guidance and circularity 51 3.7 Application of virtue ethics in health care 53 3.8 Criticisms of application of virtue ethics to examples in health care 55 3.9 Conclusion 57 Chapter Four: Legal approach 58 4.1 Professional guidance and the law 59 4.2 Interaction between disciplines 63 4.3 The value of fiduciary principles in addressing trust as a legal concept 65 4.4
    [Show full text]
  • The Duty of Candour Guidance for Providers and Inspectors
    v2.1 – 1/12/20 DRAFT THE DUTY OF CANDOUR GUIDANCE FOR PROVIDERS AND INSPECTORS Contents 1 What is the Duty of Candour? 1.1 Background 1.2 What is the difference between the statutory duty and professional duty of candour? 1.3 Does carrying out the Duty of Candour mean the provider is at fault? 2 How and when should the Duty of Candour be carried out? 2.1 When does the Duty of Candour apply and what is a Notifiable Safety Incident? 2.2 How is the Duty of Candour carried out? 3 How does CQC regulate the Duty of Candour? 3.1 Registration 3.2 Monitoring, assessment and inspection 3.3 Enforcement 3.4 FAQs about CQC’s role Appendix 1 Worked examples of the criteria for notifiable safety incidents Further examples relating to harm thresholds Appendix 2 The regulation in full v2.1 – 1/12/20 DRAFT 1 What is the Duty of Candour? The Duty of Candour is laid out in Regulation 20 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 . It requires Registered Providers and Registered Managers (known as “Registered Persons”) to act in an open and transparent way with anyone receiving care or treatment from them. The regulation also defines “notifiable safety incidents” and outlines the specific way registered persons must carry out the Duty of Candour if these incidents occur. Essentially, the Duty of Candour is about people’s right to openness and transparency from their care provider. It applies to every health and social care provider regulated by the Care Quality Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Duty of Candour
    Duty of Candour GUIDANCE FOR SURGEONS AND EMPLOYERS Supports Good Surgical Practice Domain 3: Communication, Partnership and Teamwork Published: 2015 Professional Standards The Royal College of Surgeons of England 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields London WC2A 3PE Email: [email protected] View Good Surgical Practice online: www.rcseng.ac.uk/surgeons/surgical-standards/professionalism-surgery/gsp Duty of Candour Duty of Candour GUIDANCE FOR SURGEONS AND EMPLOYERS This guidance was developed with the contributions of: Mr Leslie Hamilton, The Royal College of Surgeons of England Miss Susan Hill, The Royal College of Surgeons of England Mr Peter Lamont, The Royal College of Surgeons of England Miss Clare Marx, The Royal College of Surgeons of England Ms Katerina Sarafidou, The Royal College of Surgeons of England Dr Suzanne Shale, Clearer Thinking The College would like to thank Dr Suzanne Shale, Ethics Consultant at Clearer Thinking, for preparing the first draft. For further details, please refer to the Clearer Thinking website at www.clearer-thinking.co.uk 1 The Royal College of Surgeons of England CONTENTS A. OVERVIEW OF THE DUTY OF CANDOUR 4 B. PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDANCE 5 C. THE PROFESSIONAL DUTY OF CANDOUR FOR ALL DOCTORS 6 1. Current guidance 6 2. What do surgeons have to do? 6 3. Low harm and near misses 7 4. Parallels between consent and candour 8 5. Surgeons’ duty towards their employers and regulators 8 D. THE STATUTORY DUTY OF CANDOUR 9 1. Current legislation 9 2. Difference between the duty of individuals and the duty of organisations 10 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Culture of Candour a Review of the Threshold for the Duty of Candour and of the Incentives for Care Organisations to Be Candid
    Building a culture of candour A review of the threshold for the duty of candour and of the incentives for care organisations to be candid Sir David Dalton Prof. Norman Williams March 2014 Executive Summary 1. Put simply, candour means the quality of being open and honest. Patients should be well-informed about all elements of their care and treatment and all caring staff have a responsibility to be open and honest to those in their care. It follows then that care organisations should have and sustain a culture which supports staff to be candid. 2. Medical treatment and care is not risk free. Errors will happen and nearly all of these will be due to failures in organisational systems or genuine human errors. A duty of candour on organisations, registered with the Care Quality Commission, means that they must ensure that patients, and where appropriate their families, are told open and honestly when unanticipated errors happen which cause a patient harm above a predetermined threshold. 3. The evidence we have heard reaffirms what we already know: that when things do go wrong, patients and their families expect three things: to be told honestly what happened, what can be done to deal with any harm caused, and to know what will be done to prevent a recurrence to someone else. Health and care organisations have a responsibility to ensure that all of these are reliably undertaken. 4. Candour cannot be an ‘add on’ or a matter of compliance; candour will only be effective as part of a wider commitment to safety, learning and improvement.
    [Show full text]