1 Jim Murphy Position Player 7 T2 Yvette Cooper Star Striker 5 T2 Andy Burnham Star Striker 5 4 Rachel Reeves Star Striker 4 T5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

1 Jim Murphy Position Player 7 T2 Yvette Cooper Star Striker 5 T2 Andy Burnham Star Striker 5 4 Rachel Reeves Star Striker 4 T5

MP’s League Table Position Politician Pool category Current Points Total 1 Jim Murphy Position Player 7 T2 Yvette Cooper Star Striker 5 T2 Andy Burnham Star Striker 5 4 Rachel Reeves Star Striker 4 T5 Mary Creagh Position Player 3 T5 Caroline Flint Position Player 3 T5 Vernon Coaker Position Player 3 T5 Emma Reynolds Position Player 3 T9 Chuka Umunna Star Striker 2 T9 Luciana Berger Position Player 2 T9 Stephen Twigg Dark Horse 2 T9 Stephen Timms Dark Horse 2 T9 Roberta Blackman-Wood Dark Horse 2 T9 Kate Green Dark Horse 2 T15 Maria Eagle Position Player 1 T15 Liz Kendall Position Player 1 T15 John Denham Dark Horse 1 T15 Emily Thornberry Dark Horse 1 T15 Rushanara Ali Dark Horse 1 T15 David Hanson Dark Horse 1 T15 Lisa Nandy Dark Horse 1 T15 Jonathan Reynolds Dark Horse 1 T15 Debbie Abrahams Dark Horse 1 T15 Anne Begg Dark Horse 1 T15 Tessa Jowell Dark Horse 1 T26 Harriet Harman Star Striker 0 T26 Ed Balls Star Striker 0 T26 Douglas Alexander Star Striker 0 T26 Sadiq Khan Position Player 0 T26 Margaret Curran Position Player 0 T26 Gloria de Piero Position Player 0 T26 Stella Creasy Position Player 0 T26 Chris Leslie Position Player 0 T26 Jon Cruddas Position Player 0 T26 Chris Bryant Position Player 0 T26 Rosie Winterton Dark Horse 0 T26 Liam Byrne Dark Horse 0 T26 Michael Dugher Dark Horse 0 T26 Diana Johnson Dark Horse 0 Position Politician Pool category Current Points Total T26 Toby Perkins Dark Horse 0 T26 Diane Abbott Dark Horse 0 T26 Jamie Reed Dark Horse 0 T26 Gregg McClymont Dark Horse 0 T26 Tom Watson Dark Horse 0 T26 Jack Dromey Dark Horse 0 T26 Dan Jarvis Dark Horse 0 T26 Tom Greatrex Dark Horse 0 T26 Simon Danczuk Dark Horse 0 T26 Margaret Hodge Dark Horse 0 T26 Seema Malhotra Dark Horse 0 T26 David Lammy Dark Horse 0 52 Hilary Benn Position Player -1 53 Angela Eagle Position Player -2 T54 Tristram Hunt Star Striker -3 T55 Ivan Lewis Position Player -3 T56 Owen Smith Position Player -3.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

HOUSE of COMMONS Exiting the European Union Committee
HOUSE OF COMMONS Exiting the European Union Committee Oral evidence: The progress of the UK’s negotiations on EU withdrawal, HC 372 Monday 3 September 2018, Brussels Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 4 September 2018. Members present: Hilary Benn (Chair); Sir Christopher Chope; Stephen Crabb; Richard Graham; Peter Grant; Andrea Jenkyns; Stephen Kinnock; Jeremy Lefroy; Mr Pat McFadden; Seema Malhotra; Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg; Emma Reynolds; Stephen Timms; Mr John Whittingdale. Questions 2537 - 2563 Witnesses I: Michel Barnier, Chief Negotiator, European Commission, and Sabine Weyand, Deputy Chief Negotiator, European Commission. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Michel Barnier and Sabine Weyand. Michel Barnier: Welcome once again. You are always welcome. Q2537 Chair: Michel, can I reciprocate on behalf of the Committee? It is very good to see you again. Can I begin by apologising that we had to let you down on the previous date when we were due to meet? We had certain important votes in Parliament that necessitated our attendance. Secondly, can I thank you very much for honouring the commitment you made to us the first time we met, that you would give evidence to the Committee on the record? Because as you are aware, today’s session is being recorded and will be published as an evidence session, so it is a slightly different format from our previous discussions. I understand entirely that you will want to check the English translation of what you said before the minutes are published and we realise that will take— Michel Barnier: Just to check that nothing is lost in translation.
[Show full text]
Editorial: Left-Horizons Is Launched More Appetite for Marxist Ideas
Editorial: Left-Horizons is launched More appetite for Marxist ideas than ever before October 16 2017 The Left Horizons website is launched today with the aim of developing and promoting the Marxist strand of opinion within the Labour and trade union movement. Last week, Chris Leslie, Labour MP for Nottingham East, declared in relation to Momentum, that “there is no place for Marxism” inside the Labour Party. Leaving the aside the rather dubious link between Momentum and Marxism, even a cursory study of Labour history will show that there has always been a Marxist strand of opinion within the Party. We welcome the fact that for the first time in generations front bench Labour MPs are happy to describe themselves as “Marxists” or at the very least to pay tribute to Marx’s ideas. In contradiction to Chris Leslie, in our opinion, there should be “no place” in the Labour Party for candidates imposed undemocratically on a Constituency Labour Party, as happened to Nottingham East when Leslie was made the candidate. Neither should there be a place for any Labour MPs to be equivocal on the question of austerity and the living standards of working-class people. When Ed Miliband and Ed Balls lost the 2015 general election for Labour, Chris Leslie was one of those right- wing Labour MPs who implied that the Labour manifesto had at that time been too radical. “We should have done more about welfare reform and public-sector reform”, he said, “not just giving the impression it was all about spending more or less money.” When the Tories were hell-bent on pauperising the disabled by cutting their welfare benefits in July 2015, Chris Leslie was one of those 184 Labour MPs who did not vote against the second reading of the Tories’ Welfare Reform and Work Bill.
[Show full text]
Dan Jarvis Mp Summary of Initial Findings
RECONNECTING LABOUR SUMMARY OF INITIAL FINDINGS DAN JARVIS MP KEY POINTS Labour has been in denial for too long about the challenges posed by UKIP. They cost Labour a lot of votes in constituencies we needed to win back from the Tories and they won a lot of votes in Labour heartland seats. There are no quick fixes for stemming the rise of UKIP, but we won’t achieve it by out-UKIPing UKIP or our-Torying the Tories, nor by lurching to the left to make ourselves feel better but do nothing for those who have lost faith in us. We need to revitalise local party engagement, recruit candidates from more representative backgrounds, and make it clear what we stand for as a Party and our policy response must include reassurance on issues like work and immigration, an economic plan to extend opportunity to communities that feel forgotten, a distinct message for older people, and reclaiming our mantle as a patriotic party. 1 INTRODUCTION The first step towards solving any problem is acknowledging that one exists in the first place. Frankly, the devastating nature of the General Election result has presented Labour with no shortage of challenges. Labour didn’t just lose an election on May 7th – we lost our connection with millions of people across the country. As we look to renew and rebuild, we know we need to win back votes from the Tories. But it is also clear they are not the only opponents we need to overcome across England and Wales. Labour needs to tackle UKIP too.
[Show full text]
Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee FINANCE (NO. 2) BILL Fifth Sitting Thursday 28 October 2010 CONTENTS CLAUSE 27 agreed to. SCHEDULE 11 agreed to. CLAUSE 28 agreed to. SCHEDULE 12 agreed to. CLAUSE 29 agreed to. SCHEDULE 13 agreed to. CLAUSES 30 and 31 agreed to. SCHEDULE 14 agreed to. CLAUSES 32 and 33 agreed to. Bill, as amended, to be reported. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £4·00 PBC (Bill 072) 2010 - 2011 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 1 November 2010 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 131 Public Bill Committee28 OCTOBER 2010 Finance (No. 2) Bill 132 The Committee
[Show full text]
Political Affairs Brief a Daily Summary of Political Events Affecting the Jewish Community
23 October 2009 Political Affairs Brief A daily summary of political events affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities SCoJeC Contents Home Affairs Foreign Affairs Israel Relevant Legislation Consultations Home Affairs UK Parliamentary Question Tony Blair Faith Foundation Mr. Moore: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what funding his Department has provided to the Tony Blair Faith Foundation; for which events run by the Foundation his Department has provided sponsorship; and if he will make a statement. [293764] Mr. Douglas Alexander: The Department for International Development (DFID) has not provided any funding directly to the Tony Blair Faith Foundation (TBFF). We have provided £30,000 to World Vision, who are co-sponsoring a seminar series with the TBFF focusing on the theme of faiths in development. Oxfam and Islamic Relief have also contributed funds to the series. These seminars are taking place at the Royal Society of Arts in London from 7 September to 12 November. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm091022/text/91022w00 24.htm#09102248000057 UK Parliament Early Day Motion Mike Gapes (2145) BBC and the British National Party – That this House believes that the BBC are profoundly wrong to argue that just because the modern heirs of Hitler, the holocaust-denying racists of the BNP, have the support of six per cent. of the UK population they should be treated as a normal party and invited onto the main television political programme Question Time; notes that no previous BBC Director General made such a judgement and that neither Martin Webster, who polled 16 per cent.
[Show full text]
Labour: a Better Future for Women
A BETTER FUTURE FOR WOMEN A BETTER FUTURE FOR WOMEN FOREWORD Labour Party values start from the belief that who you are or where you come from should never hold you back from achieving your potential. We have made great strides in improving equality for women, from the right to vote to the right to equal pay, and Labour has consistently lead this progress. Under the last Labour Government, the gender pay gap closed by almost a third, we opened 3,000 Sure Start Centres, extended maternity leave and introduced paternity leave, and transformed the way that police, prosecutors and courts dealt with cases of domestic violence. But progress for women has never been achieved by sitting back. In the last five years progress to close the gender pay gap has slowed. More women are low paid and on zero-hours contracts. Many families feel that they have never been so stretched. Instead of taking action the Tories have chosen to hit women harder, with women bearing 85 per cent of the impact of tax and benefit changes. Violence against women and girls is a national scandal. Rapes and incidents of domestic violence reported to the police have gone up, but the number of cases prosecuted and convicted has fallen. And there is still much further to go to change a culture that permits everyday sexism. Labour has a better plan for equality for men and women from the shop floor to the boardroom. We’ll do more to help women and men balance families and work through more free childcare.
[Show full text]
Brace Yourselves – This Election Will See Even More Political Adverts. It Won't Be Pretty
7/10/2019 Brace yourselves – this election will see even more political adverts. It won't be pretty Academic rigour, journalistic flair Subscribe Fourth estate follies Trawling through the dustbins of the UK media Brace yourselves – this election will see even more political adverts. It won’t be pretty February 23, 2015 6.20pm GMT Author John Jewell Director of Undergraduate Studies, School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University Sometimes political advertising can backfire. Freakangels.com, CC BY-SA The extraordinary resignation of its chief political editor, Peter Oborne, from the Daily Telegraph has given us cause to think about the importance of corporate influence in journalism and the significance of advertising revenue to newspapers. As these events occurred, the paper’s Ben Riley-Smith was providing us with further proof, if any were needed, that advertising will play a major part in May’s general election. In a Telegraph article which asked whether Britain was entering an “new era” of political attack ads, Riley-Smith drew attention to the fact that the Conservatives had been posting a series of short videos (none of them lasting more than a minute) on YouTube concentrating on Ed Miliband’s supposed https://theconversation.com/brace-yourselves-this-election-will-see-even-more-political-adverts-it-wont-be-pretty-37934 1/5 7/10/2019 Brace yourselves – this election will see even more political adverts. It won't be pretty incompetence and the Labour party’s general untrustworthiness. One, posted on Feb 3, is a 16-second head rush called: “The SNP and Sinn Fein propping up Ed Miliband? Chaos for Britain”.
[Show full text]
Survey Report
YouGov / Election Data Survey Results Sample Size: 1096 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 27th February - 3rd March 2017 EU Ref Vote 2015 Vote Age Gender Social Grade Region Membership Length Not Rest of Midlands / Pre Corbyn After Corbyn Total Remain Leave Lab 18-39 40-59 60+ Male Female ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Lab South Wales leader leader Weighted Sample 1096 961 101 859 237 414 393 288 626 470 743 353 238 322 184 294 55 429 667 Unweighted Sample 1096 976 96 896 200 351 434 311 524 572 826 270 157 330 217 326 63 621 475 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION: Westminster [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] Con 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lab 92 92 95 92 93 92 92 93 92 94 90 97 94 90 94 93 93 89 95 Lib Dem 5 6 1 6 3 5 5 6 7 3 7 2 5 8 4 4 4 9 3 UKIP 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Other 1 2 0 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 Other Parties Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] SNP/ PCY 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Green 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 BNP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Respect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 © 2017 YouGov plc.
[Show full text]
The IR35 MP Hit List the 100 Politicians Most Likely to Lose Their Seats
The UK's leading contractor site. 200,000 monthly unique visitors. GUIDES IR35 CALCULATORS BUSINESS INSURANCE BANKING ACCOUNTANTS INSURANCE MORTGAGES PENSIONS RESOURCES FREE IR35 TEST The IR35 MP hit list The 100 politicians most likely to lose their seats Last December research conducted by ContractorCalculator identified the MPs for whom it will prove most costly to lose the selfemployed vote, and published the top 20 from each party. The results were based on data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and contractor sentiment indicated by a previous ContractorCalculator survey. The full results of this research are now published, with the top 100 MPs, ordered by risk of losing their seat, due to the Offpayroll (IR35) reforms that Treasury, HMRC and the Chancellor are attempting to push through Parliament. In total, 85 MPs hold a majority in Parliament that would feasibly be overturned if the expected turnout of IR35opposing selfemployed voters from their constituency were to vote against them, and we list the next 15, making 100 in total, that are potentially under threat if the self employed voter turnout is higher than expected. "This single piece of damaging policy could prove catastrophic for all parties involved, not least the Tories, who make up 43% of the atrisk seats,” comments ContractorCalculator CEO, Dave Chaplin. “There is also potentially a lot to gain for some, but those in precarious positions will have to act swiftly and earnestly to win over contractors’ trust.” How we identified the atrisk MPs The research leveraged the data and compared the MPs majority at the last election with the likely number of selfemployed voters in their area who would turn out and vote against them.
[Show full text]
Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times.
[Show full text]
Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
[Show full text]
Yougov / the Sunday Times Survey Results
YouGov / The Sunday Times Survey Results Sample Size: 1011 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 7th - 9th September 2010 1st Preference - September 2010 1st Preference - July 2010 September Choice July Choice Gender Age Diane Andy David Ed Diane Andy David Ed David Ed David Ed Total Ed Balls Ed Balls Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Weighted Sample 1008 106 86 91 354 287 99 45 65 244 209 431 474 320 340 577 432 331 303 374 Unweighted Sample 1011 102 89 97 344 296 93 45 69 239 221 429 485 310 353 654 357 307 317 387 % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 1st Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] David Miliband 38 0001000824 9 79 16 83 0 68 11 36 42 41 39 35 Ed Miliband 31 00001001114 13 11 69 1 62 11 50 31 31 33 28 33 Diane Abbott 11 1000000702 3144164181112131111 Andy Burnham 10 001000029 66 4 6 7 10 10 10 12 7 8 10 11 Ed Balls 9 0100000852 10 5 6 5 12 7 11 10 8 5 13 10 Weighted Sample 846 92 82 84 320 268 84 41 55 214 186 384 427 279 296 493 353 280 258 308 Unweighted Sample 849 90 85 89 308 277 80 41 58 207 199 380 438 268 309 555 294 260 266 323 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 2nd Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] Ed Miliband 30 53 48 34 43 0 42 32 25 33 22 35 27 30 29 29 32 32 33 26 Ed Balls 22 200 2825251936 26 23 21 23 21 24 22 23 21 20 23 23 Andy Burnham 19 14 17 0 21 24 14 18 19 21 18 19 19 19 18 18 20 21 20 16 David Miliband 17 13 20 30 0 35 13 12 24 10 27 13 21 16 20 17 17 15 12 23 Diane Abbott 11 0 15 8 11 16 11 2 7 12 12 9 12 11 11 12 10 12 11 12 Weighted Sample 905 90 74 75 351 285 82 40 56 233 203 431 474 299 319 519 387 303 267 336 Unweighted Sample 914 87 78 84 341 293 79 40 60 228 214 429 485 290 334 592 322 283 280 351 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Miliband preference - September [Excluding definitely wouldn't vote] David Miliband 48 19 28 41 100 1 25 34 37 86 17 100 0 80 17 47 49 48 46 48 Ed Miliband 52 81 72 59 0 99 75 66 63 14 83 0 100 20 83 53 51 52 54 52 1 © 2010 YouGov plc.
[Show full text]