Kentucky Geological Survey the Paleontology of Kentucky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kentucky Geological Survey the Paleontology of Kentucky The Kentucky Geological Survey WILLARD ROUSE JILLSON Director and State Geologist SERIES SIX Volume Thirty-six The Paleontology of Kentucky 1931 BRACHIOSPONGIA DIGITATA. A rare Franklin County, Kentucky, Fossil Sponge from the Brannon (Ordovician) limestone. Because of its unusual figure and rarity it is much prized by collectors as a museum piece. Photo by W. R. Jillson, 1927. THE PALEONTOLOGY OF KENTUCKY A Symposium outlining systematically, and briefly describing with stratigraphic references the various fossil forms of life indigenous to the rocks of the Commonwealth, arranged and edited By WILLARD ROUSE JILLSON, B. S., M. S., Sc. D. State Geologist of Kentucky From the separate manuscripts of ROY LEE MOODIE, A. B., Ph. D. ARTHUR CRANE McFARLAN, A. B., Ph. D. AUGUST FREDERICK FOERSTE, A. B., A. M., Ph. D. THOMAS EDMUND SAVAGE, A. B., B. S., M. S., Ph. D. JAMES MARVIN WELLER, B. S., Ph. D. WILLIAM CLIFFORD MORSE, A. B., A. M., Ph. D. JOSEPH KENT ROBERTS, A. B., A. M., Ph. D. and CHALMER LEWIS COOPER, B. S., M. S. Illustrated with One Hundred and Thirteen Photographs, Maps and Diagrams THE KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 1931 First Edition 500 Copies Copyright 1931, by KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY All Rights Reserved THE STATE JOURNAL COMPANY Printers to the Commonwealth FRANKFORT, KY. Dedicated to the REMARKABLE EARLY SCIENTIFIC IMPULSES of M. deLongueil, 1739 Colonel Christopher Gist, 1751 Colonel George Croghan, 1765 Captain Harry Gordon, 1766 Benjamin Franklin, 1768 George Louis LeClerc, Comte de Buffon General William Henry Harrison, 1795 President Thomas Jefferson, 1797 Doctor William Goforth, 1804 Thomas Ashe, Esquire, 1806 General William Clark, 1807 and John Clifford, 1816 who because of their interest in, collection of and philosophical writings on the PLEISTOCENE MAMMALIAN FOSSILS OF BIG BONE LICK may be properly accredited with the placement of the foundation stones of KENTUCKY PALEONTOLOGY Contents An Introduction to Kentucky Paleontology. By Willard Rouse J i l l s o n __________________xi The Geological Succession of Life in Kentucky. By Roy Lee Moodie __________________ 1 The Ordovician Fauna. By Arthur Crane McFarlan_______________ 47 The Silurian Fauna. By August Frederick F o e r s t e ___________ 167 The Devonian Fauna. By Thomas Edmund Savage_____________ 215 The Mississippian Fauna. By James Marvin Welter________________ 249 The Pennsylvanian Invertebrate Fauna. By William Clifford Morse _____________ 293 The Pennsylvanian Vertebrate Fauna. By Roy Lee Moodie___________________351 The Mesozoic Fauna and Flora. By Joseph Kent Roberts ________________387 The Cenozoic Fauna and Flora. By Joseph Kent Roberts_____________ 407 The Pleistocene Fauna. By Chalmer Lewis Cooper__ ___________ 433 Index _____________________________________________463 List of Illustrations Page Plate A. Brachiospongia Digitata ________________________________ Frontispiece Figure 1. The oldest known bacteria from the pre-Cambrian rocks 5 Figure 2. Diagrammatic section of the earth's crust _________________________ 6 Figure 3. Life in the Cambrian period ___________________________________ 7 Figure 4. A number of small crustacea ___________________________________ 9 Figule 5. Some sea animals ___________________________________________ 12 Figure 6. Life in the old Silurian rocks ___________________________________14 Figure 7. Dependent life in the Paleozoic _________________________________15 Figure 8. Diseased Paleozoic animals ___________________________________16 Figure 9. Animals which lived during Devonian times ______________________17 Figure 10. A restoration of the Crossopterygerian fish, Devonian ________ 19 Figure 11. A restoration of the earliest known petrified forest ______________ 21 Figure 12. A Devonian footprint of a land vertebrate _______________________22 Figure 13. Two animals from rocks of the Mississippian period ______________ 23 Figure 14. Amphibian footprints in Mississippian shales _________ __________24 Figure 15. Rock of Pennsylvanian age ________________________ __________29 Figure 16. Part of the skeleton of an amphibian _________________ __________ 30 Figurc 17. Restoration of two Coal Measures amphibians ________ ___ _______31 Figure 18. One of the salamander-like stegocephalians ___________ __________32 Figure 19. The only known reptile found in American Coal Measures _________ 33 Figure 20. Composite restorations of Coal Measure trees ____________________ 34 Figure 21. Injured skull of a Pleistocene Mastodon _________________________ 38 Figure 22. The American Mastodon _____________________________________39 Figure 23. Teeth of Mastodon and Mammoth _____________________________ 40 Figure 24. Kentucky Pleistocene Mammoth ______________________________41 Figure 25. Map of Kentucky ___________________________________________ 49 Plate B. High Bridge and Lexington Limestones at Boonesboro ______________ 60 Plate I. Fossils of High Bridge and Lower Lexington ___________________ __ 129 Plate II. Fossils of Lexington Limestone _____________________________ __ 131 Plate III. Fossils of Lexington Limestone ____ _______________________ __ 133 Plate IV. Fossils of Lexington Limestone ____________________________ __ 135 Plate V. Fossils of Cynthiana Limestone _____________________________ __ 131 Plate VI. Fossils of Cynthiana Limestone ____________________________ __ 139 Plate VII. Fossils of Cynthiana Limestone ____________________________ __ 141 Plate VIII. Fossils of Rogers Gap and Eden shale ______________________ __ 143 Plate IX. Fossils of Eden Shale ________________ ____________________ __ 145 Plate X. Fossils of the Fairview _______________ ____________________ __ 147 Plate XI. Fossils of the Fairview _______________ ____________________ __ 149 Plate XII. Fossils of the McMillan _____________ ____________________ __ 151 Plante XIII. Fossils of the McMillan ___________ ____________________ __ 153 Plate XIV. Fossils of the Richmond ____________ ____________________ __ 155 Plate XY. Fossils of the Richmond _____________ ____________________ __ 151 Plate XVI. Fossils of the Richmond ____________ ____________________ __ 159 Figure 26. Map of Kentucky of Silurian rocks _________________________ __ 112 Plate XVII. Fossils of the Brassfield ________________________________ __ 195 Plate XVIII. Fossils of the Brassfield ________________________________ __ 191 Plate XIX. Fossils of the Brassfield, Bisher, etc. _______________________ __ 199 Plate XX. Fossils of the Waco _____________________________________ __ 201 Plate XXI. Fossils of the Ribolt and Bisher ___________________________ __ 203 Plate XXII. Fossils of the Lilley, Peebles, etc. _________________________ __ 205 Plate XXIII. Fossils of Osgood, Laurel, etc. __________________________ __ 201 Plate XXIV. Fossils from the Louisville _____________________________ __ 209 Plate XXV. Fossils from the Louisville ______________________________ __ 211 Plate XXVI. Fossils from the Louisville _____________________________ __ 213 Figure 27. Map of Kentucky showing Devonian strata __________________ __ 211 Plate XXVII. Fossils of the Jeffersonville Limestone ___________________ __ 231 Plate XXVIII. Fossils of the Jeffersonville Limestone __________________ __239 Page Plate XXIX. Fossils of Sellersburg and Jeffersonville Limestone ___________ 241 Plate XXX. Fossils of Sellersburg Limestone ___________________________243 Plate XXXI. Fossils of Sellersburg and Jeffersonville Limestone ____________245 Plate XXXII. Fossils of Duffin Shale __________________________________247 Figure 28. Map of Kentucky showing Mississippian rocks _________________252 Plate XXXIII. Fossils of the New Providence ___________________________269 Plate XXXIV. Fossils of the Keokuk Age _____________________________ 271 Plate XXXV. Fossils of the Warsaw-Salem _____________________________273 Plate XXXVI. Fossils of the St. Louis _________________________________275 Plate XXX VII. Fossils of the St. Louis ________________________________277 Plate XXXVIII. Fossils of the Ste. Genevieve ___________________________279 Plate XXXIX. Fossils of the Chester _________________________________ 281 Plate XL. Fossils of the Renault ______________________________________283 Plate XLI. Fossils of the Paint Creek _________________________________ 285 Plate XLII. Fossils of the Golconda ___________________________________287 Plate XLIII. Fossils of the Glen Dean __________________________________289 Plate XLIV. Fossils of the Upper Chester _____________________________ 291 Figure 29. Distribution of Pennsylvanian sediments ______________________296 Plate XLV. Fossils of the Kendrick and Dwale shales ____________________ 331 Plate XLVI. Fossils from the Kendrick shales ___________________________333 Plate XLVII. Fossils from Kendrick shales and Magoffin beds ______________335 Plate XLVIII. Fossils from the Kendrick shales and Magoffin beds __ 337 Plate XLIX. Fossils from the Kendrick shales and Magoffin beds ___________339 Plate L. Fossils from the Kendrick shales and Magoffin beds ______________ 341 Plate LI. Fossils from the Kendrick shales and Flint Ridge _________________343 Plate LII. Fossils from the Kendrick shales _____________________________345 Plate LIII. Fossils from the Kendrick shales and Magoffin beds _____________347 Plate LIV. Fossils from the Kendrick shales ____________________________349 Figure 30. Fossil footprints in rocks of Oklahoma ________________________354 Plate LV. Geological Map of North America ____________________________367 Plate LVI. Fishes from the Pennsylvanian
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Mitogenomes Shed Light on the Evolutionary History And
    Ancient Mitogenomes Shed Light on the Evolutionary History and Biogeography of Sloths Frédéric Delsuc, Melanie Kuch, Gillian Gibb, Emil Karpinski, Dirk Hackenberger, Paul Szpak, Jorge Martinez, Jim Mead, H. Gregory Mcdonald, Ross Macphee, et al. To cite this version: Frédéric Delsuc, Melanie Kuch, Gillian Gibb, Emil Karpinski, Dirk Hackenberger, et al.. Ancient Mitogenomes Shed Light on the Evolutionary History and Biogeography of Sloths. Current Biology - CB, Elsevier, 2019. hal-02326384 HAL Id: hal-02326384 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02326384 Submitted on 22 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Ancient Mitogenomes Shed Light on the Evolutionary 2 History and Biogeography of Sloths 3 Frédéric Delsuc,1,13,*, Melanie Kuch,2 Gillian C. Gibb,1,3, Emil Karpinski,2,4 Dirk 4 Hackenberger,2 Paul Szpak,5 Jorge G. Martínez,6 Jim I. Mead,7,8 H. Gregory 5 McDonald,9 Ross D. E. MacPhee,10 Guillaume Billet,11 Lionel Hautier,1,12 and 6 Hendrik N. Poinar2,* 7 Author list footnotes 8 1Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier
    [Show full text]
  • X Hydrogeologic Framework and Geochemistry of Ground Water
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 02-4123 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, SOUTHERN DIVISION, SHEET 1 of 3 NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Taylor. C.J., and Hostettler, F.D., 2002, Hydrogeologic Framework and Geochemistry of Ground Water and Petroleum in the Silurian-Devonian Carbonate Aquifer, South-Central Louisville, Kentucky science USGSfor a changing world INTRODUCTION (A) (B) (C) (D) Previously published investigations concerning the ground-water resources HOLE DIAMETER, ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER. ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER. ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER, ACOUSTIC of the city of Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky, have mostly focused on IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER the highly productive Ohio River alluvial aquifer (Rorabaugh, 1956; Walker, 1957; Bell. 1966: Unthank and others, 1995). In contrast, relatively little attention has been given to the Ordovician and Silurian-Devonian carbonate aquifers that 10h X 10.4 underlie much of the Louisville and Jefferson County area (fig. I) because of their limited potential for water-supply development (Palmquist and Hall, 1960). LLJ LU O O However, detailed information about the ground-water quality and hydrogeology of £ the carbonate aquifer is needed by State and Federal environmental regulators and o: a: ^ ID private consultants for planning and conducting local environmental t,ite 5% CO C/3 t. * assessments and ground-water remediation. The Silurian-Devonian carbonate Q Q aquifer is of particular interest because it underlies much of the urbanized and 40;: 72%- industrialized areas of the city of Louisville, exhibits moderately well-developed NF karst, and is potentially vulnerable to human-induced contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Taphonomy and Significance of Jefferson's Ground Sloth (Xenarthra: Megalonychidae) from Utah
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 61 Number 1 Article 9 1-29-2001 Taphonomy and significance of Jefferson's ground sloth (Xenarthra: Megalonychidae) from Utah H. Gregory McDonald Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, Hagerman, Idaho Wade E. Miller Thomas H. Morris Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation McDonald, H. Gregory; Miller, Wade E.; and Morris, Thomas H. (2001) "Taphonomy and significance of Jefferson's ground sloth (Xenarthra: Megalonychidae) from Utah," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 61 : No. 1 , Article 9. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol61/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 61(1), © 2001, pp. 64–77 TAPHONOMY AND SIGNIFICANCE OF JEFFERSON’S GROUND SLOTH (XENARTHRA: MEGALONYCHIDAE) FROM UTAH H. Gregory McDonald1, Wade E. Miller2, and Thomas H. Morris2 ABSTRACT.—While a variety of mammalian megafauna have been recovered from sediments associated with Lake Bonneville, Utah, sloths have been notably rare. Three species of ground sloth, Megalonyx jeffersonii, Paramylodon har- lani, and Nothrotheriops shastensis, are known from the western United States during the Pleistocene. Yet all 3 are rare in the Great Basin, and the few existing records are from localities on the basin margin. The recent discovery of a partial skeleton of Megalonyx jeffersonii at Point-of-the-Mountain, Salt Lake County, Utah, fits this pattern and adds to our understanding of the distribution and ecology of this extinct species.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 27 No 1 1980.Pdf
    (- ~ .. ......• '\ i~.. • Published by THE TENNESSEE GENEALOGICAL. SOCIETY Memphis, Tennessee ... • VOLUME 27 SPRING, 1980 NUMBER 1 - CONTENTS - OVER THE EDITOR' DESK •••••• . · . ... .. 1 NEWS AND NOTES FROM OTHER PUBLICATIONS • . 2 BOOK REVIEWS . ... .. ·. 4 ( 1833 ENUMERAtION, FENTRESS COUNTY, TENNESSEE. · . 9 TENNESSEE NEWS ITEMS FROM MISSISSIPPI NEWSPAPERS • ·... .. 12 FAMILY GATHERINGS . .... .... .. · . · · · 13 BLOUNT COUNTY, TENNESSEE, LOOSE MARRIAGE BONDS AND LICENSES · · · 18 EXCERPT FROM REGISTER OF INTERMENTS AT THE NECROPOLIS · ·· 25 FAYETTE COUNTY, TENNESSEE, COURT MINUTES •• . 26 GREEN CEMETERY, FAYETTE COUNTY, TENNESSEE · . 31 ROGERS FAMILY BIBLE, JACKSON AND SMITH COUNTIES, TENNESSEE · . · ·· 32 INDEX TO 1840 CENSUS, WAYNE COUNTY, TENNESSEE • 33 WAYNE COUNTY, TENNESSEE, REVOLUTIONARY AND MILITARY PENSIONERS 39 JORDAN FAMILY BIBLE, OBION COUNTY, TENNESSEE •••• .. .. 39 WARREN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, DEED BOOK E- Abstracts 40 QUERIES .... .. ....... ... .. .. ... 46 THE TENNESSEE GENEA~OGICAL SOCIETY P. 0, BOX 12124 .. Memphi S t Tennessee 38112 OFFICERS AND STAFF FO~ 1980 President Wilma Sutton Cogdell Vice President Jane C()ok Hollis Recordin~ Secretary Marilyn Johnson Baugus Correspondence Secretary R. F. Simpson, Jr. Librarian Louise +,ittsworth Tyus Assistant Librarian Evelyn Duncan Sigler Surname Index Secretary Betty Key Treasurer Mrs. Homer D. Turner Editor Associate Editor Herbert Ray Ashworth Director Eleanor Riggins Barham Director Laurence B. Gardiner LIBRARY STAFF EDITORIAL STAFF BUSINESS STAFF Lucile Hendren Cox Betsy Foster West . Pauline Casey Briscoe Myrtle Louise Shelton Henrietta D. Gilley Lynn Hodges Craven Herman L. Bogan Betty Cline Miller Jessie Taylor Webb Eleanor W. Griffin Helen Culbreath Hamer Sarah Duncan Blalock Jean Alexander West Amelia Pike Eddlemon Thomas Proctor Hughes, Jr. Elizabeth Riggins Nichols "ANSEARCHIN'" NEWS is the official publication of THE TENNESSEE GENEALOGICAL p~blished SOCIETY; quarterly in March t June,September, and December; annual subscription $8.00.
    [Show full text]
  • CUHSLROG M130.Pdf (2.088Mb)
    ...., ,I ___, I \ I 1/ r • I -- ) ... ..... 1 ~ rt-Ila-: • I J \ - . ••c l ,I ,... t l "'~ ~, ,! I I .{ ~ I 'I t· I t ,. ... - l..' .... .,....,. , . •. ,.... 'lf->1--••<P> ~. T I • r ~J'_._ e t , ! - \ I ' II ,. • ..,. I - .. I I ,., I J. • ,. XIXU! CENTlTI~Y M\t1UCA The exhibit on display from May 6 through May 31 covers some prominent figures in American medicine during the nineteenth century -- Ephraim MACDOWELL, who performed the first successful ovariotomy (1809), William BEAUMONT , who carried out investigations on the gastric juice (1833), Daniel DRAKE, an important figure in the history of medical education and author of Principal Diseases of the Interior Talley of North America (1850) , and Walter REED (d. 1902) , conqueror of yellow fever. Walter REED (1851 - 1902) (1851 - 1902) The University of Virginia in 1869 awarded the degree of Doctor of Medicine to Walter Reed, at the age of 17 the youngest man to graduate from the medical school. Reed continued his training at Bellevue Hospital in New York and at King's County Hospital in Brooklyn. He was commissioned First Lieutenant, Medical Corps, u. s. Army, in 1875, and served initially as sole physician at a frontier post in Arizona. In 1890 Reed was ordered to Baltimore for work in bacteriology and pathology in the laboratories of William H. WELCH. In 1893 he was ordered to duty at the Surgeon General's Office in Washington. At the outbreak of the Spanish-American War, he served as Chairman of a Committee to study the modes of propagation of typhoid fever. Reed's last and most significant Army assignment was his investigation of the mode of transmission of yellow fever.
    [Show full text]
  • A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Megalonyx) Cranium from Turin, Monona County, Iowa
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 90 Number Article 6 1983 A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Megalonyx) Cranium from Turin, Monona County, Iowa H. Gregory McDonald Idaho State University Duane C. Anderson University of Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1983 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation McDonald, H. Gregory and Anderson, Duane C. (1983) "A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Megalonyx) Cranium from Turin, Monona County, Iowa," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 90(4), 134-140. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol90/iss4/6 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. McDonald and Anderson: A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Megalonyx) Cranium from Turin, Mon Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 90(4): 134-140. 1983 A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Mega/onyx) Cranium from Turin, Monona County, Iowa H. GREGORY McDONALD 1 Idaho Museum of Natural History, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209 DUANE C. ANDERSON State Archaeologist, Univeristy of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 A well-preserved cranium of a large Pleistocene ground sloth (Mega/onyx jeffersonii) is described in detail and compared with six other North American Mega/onyx crania. Although the morphology of the Iowa specimen compares favorably with all others, the descending flange of the zygomatic arch is unusual in that it is sharply deflected to the posterior.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Exposures
    Searching for the Pliocene: Southern Exposures Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center The 2012 Desert Research Symposium April 2012 Table of contents Searching for the Pliocene: Field trip guide to the southern exposures Field trip day 1 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Robert E. Reynolds, editor Field trip day 2 �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19 George T. Jefferson, David Lynch, L. K. Murray, and R. E. Reynolds Basin thickness variations at the junction of the Eastern California Shear Zone and the San Bernardino Mountains, California: how thick could the Pliocene section be? ��������������������������������������������������������������� 31 Victoria Langenheim, Tammy L. Surko, Phillip A. Armstrong, Jonathan C. Matti The morphology and anatomy of a Miocene long-runout landslide, Old Dad Mountain, California: implications for rock avalanche mechanics �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38 Kim M. Bishop The discovery of the California Blue Mine ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 44 Rick Kennedy Geomorphic evolution of the Morongo Valley, California ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45 Frank Jordan, Jr. New records
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeoproteomics Resolves Sloth Relationships
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0909-z Palaeoproteomics resolves sloth relationships Samantha Presslee1,2,3,24, Graham J. Slater4,24, François Pujos5, Analía M. Forasiepi5, Roman Fischer 6, Kelly Molloy7, Meaghan Mackie3,8, Jesper V. Olsen 8, Alejandro Kramarz9, Matías Taglioretti10, Fernando Scaglia10, Maximiliano Lezcano11, José Luis Lanata 11, John Southon12, Robert Feranec13, Jonathan Bloch14, Adam Hajduk15, Fabiana M. Martin16, Rodolfo Salas Gismondi 17, Marcelo Reguero18, Christian de Muizon19, Alex Greenwood20,21, Brian T. Chait 7, Kirsty Penkman22, Matthew Collins3,23 and Ross D. E. MacPhee2* The living tree sloths Choloepus and Bradypus are the only remaining members of Folivora, a major xenarthran radiation that occupied a wide range of habitats in many parts of the western hemisphere during the Cenozoic, including both continents and the West Indies. Ancient DNA evidence has played only a minor role in folivoran systematics, as most sloths lived in places not conducive to genomic preservation. Here we utilize collagen sequence information, both separately and in combination with published mitochondrial DNA evidence, to assess the relationships of tree sloths and their extinct relatives. Results from phylo- genetic analysis of these datasets differ substantially from morphology-based concepts: Choloepus groups with Mylodontidae, not Megalonychidae; Bradypus and Megalonyx pair together as megatherioids, while monophyletic Antillean sloths may be sister to all other folivorans. Divergence estimates are consistent with fossil evidence for mid-Cenozoic presence of sloths in the West Indies and an early Miocene radiation in South America. he sloths (Xenarthra, Folivora), nowadays a taxonomically consensus8–10,16,17 in morphology-based phylogenetic treatments is narrow (six species in two genera) component of the fauna of to place the three-toed sloth as sister to all other folivorans (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devonian Limestones of Central Ohio and Southern Indiana
    184 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VII, No. 8, THE DEVONIAN LIMESTONES OF CENTRAL OHIO AND SOUTHERN INDIANA. CLINTON R. STAUFFER. A comparative study of the two regions, lying on opposite sides of the Cincinnati island, shows that there is a. remarkable similarity between the Devonian limestones of central Ohio and southern Indiana. This is perhaps more evident from a litholog- ical point of view although the paleontology of the formations of the two places is very similar and the stratigraphic arrange- ment is identical. These deposits in Ohio have been divided into the Columbus and Delaware limestones. The Columbus presents two very different lithological phases which are persistent throughout the state. In southern Indiana Dr. Edward M. Kindle has recog- nized three distinct formations, the Geneva and Jeffersonville limestones and the Sellersburg beds,1 the latter including the Silver Creek hydraulic limestone of some authors. The lower of these Indiana formations, stratigraphic ally, is the Geneva limestone which "is generally a massive light buff to chocolate brown saccharoidal magnesian limestone" in which "fossils are extremely rare at most locations and occur usually as casts when found."2 It thins out toward the Ohio river but may be seen in the vicinity of Charleston, along the hill above the "Lick" and at the road side east of town. In Ohio the lower thirty-five to forty feet of the Columbus limestone answers admirably to the above description. It is usually a porous brown limestone high in its percentage of mag- nesium carbonate. The bedding is irregular and frequently almost wanting. Oblique jointing, although not necessarily characteristic, is common.
    [Show full text]
  • B2150-B FRONT Final
    Bedrock Geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri By W. John Nelson THE PADUCAH CUSMAP QUADRANGLE: RESOURCE AND TOPICAL INVESTIGATIONS Martin B. Goldhaber, Project Coordinator T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2150–B R I A N P T E E R D . I O S . R A joint study conducted in collaboration with the Illinois State Geological U Survey, the Indiana Geological Survey, the Kentucky Geological Survey, and the Missouri M 9 Division of Geology and Land Survey A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nelson, W. John Bedrock geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky, and Missouri / by W. John Nelson. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2150–B) (The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:2150–B 1. Geology—Middle West. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B QE75.B9 no. 2150–B [QE78.7] [557.3 s—dc21 97–7724 [557.7] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Part of the Texas Coastal Plain
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 335 GEOLOGY AND UNDERGROUND WATERS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THE TEXAS COASTAL PLAIN BY ALEXANDER DEUSSEN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 13 Physiography.............................................................. 14 General character..................................................... 14 Topographic features.................................................. 16 Relief............................................................ 16 Coast prairie.................................................. 16 Kisatchie Wold............................................... 16 Nacogdoches Wold............................................ 16 Corsicana Cuesta and White Rock Escarpment................... 18 Bottom lands................................................. 18 Mounds and pimple plains...................................... 19 Drainage.......................................................... 19 Timber............................................................... 21 General geologic features................................................... 21 Relation of geology to the occurrence of underground water............... 21 Principles of stratigraphy.............................................. 22 Erosion and sedimentation.......................................... 22 The geologic column.............................................. 22 Subdivision
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Tower Limestone (Devonian) of Southern Illinois
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship... STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION GRAND TOWER LIMESTONE (DEVONIAN) OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS Wayne F. Meents David H. Swann ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John C. Frye, Chief URBANA CIRCULAR 389 1965 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/grandtowerlimest389meen GRAND TOWER LIMESTONE (DEVONIAN) OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS Wayne F. Meents and David H. Swann ABSTRACT The Grand Tower Limestone has been the source of over a hundred million barrels of oil in Illinois, the bulk of the Devo- nian production of the state. The formation underlies most of southern and central Illinois and extends into Missouri, Iowa, Indiana, and Kentucky, where its equivalents are the Cooper, Wapsipinicon, and Jeffersonville Limestones. The Grand Tower has a maximum thickness of a little more than 200 feet. It is a sandy, but otherwise pure, carbonate unit that forms approxi- mately the lower half of the Middle Devonian carbonate sequence of the region. TheGrand Tower is dominantly fossiliferous lime- stone in southern Illinois, dolomite in most of central Illinois, and lithographic limestone where it pinches out in north-central Illinois against the Sangamon Arch. The Sangamon Arch was an east-west structure that probably separated the Grand Tower from the Wapsipinicon Limestone of northern Illinois and Iowa during their deposition. Ithasbeen so modified by post-Devonian move- ments that it is no longer an important structural element.
    [Show full text]