DOCSLIB.ORG

The Political Economy of American Empire PDF Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Political Economy of American Empire PDF Book THE MAKING OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AMERICAN EMPIRE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Leo Panitch,Sam Gindin | 464 pages | 08 Oct 2013 | Verso Books | 9781781681367 | English | London, United Kingdom The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire PDF Book However by if not before China may become the centre of gravity of global capital accumulation, and by that stage the Chinese armed forces may present a more serious rival to the US. Globalization had appeared to be the natural outcome of this unstoppable process. Inequality and Integration in Times of Crisis. The number of manufacturing workers in China alone is now double the ten leading developed countries combined and its total labour force is larger than that of the US, Europe, Japan and all Latin America combined. Volume 7, Number 3 The US economy has not stagnated compared with other advanced states. Like rich, intelligent, and entrepreneurial people the world over they gravitate toward the English-speaking countries the United States most of all where they become members not of the transnational capitalist class but of the Anglo- American ruling elite. This American world-empire -- a system of comingled state machinery centered on Washington but incorporating to various degrees the state machineries of nearly every country in the world -- clearly has the capacity to dictate the terms of trade on all major global markets, from crude oil politically manipulated to bitcoins shut down. Behind arguments about Israel-Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Iran and a host of other debates lurks an interpretation of imperialism largely inherited from Stalinism. Robinson locates the new imperialism in class terms but also misses the passing of capitalism as such. I try to review all my books to the best of my ability so I will attempt it. What has happened to the once strong labour movement? Why was it that governments were willing to put up hundreds of billions of dollars to save those greed driven banks and corporations while letting individuals at the bottom I set out several months ago to answer a number of questions that I had about the nature of neo-liberal globalized capitalism. The British just happened to have a facility for government. There is no "rising challenger" to American hegemony. Only intellectual property rights that are recognized by United States have effective global enforceability. August 8, U. Be the first to ask a question about The Making of Global Capitalism. More Details To my knowledge, it is the best in existence, wide-ranging in time as well as in space, perceptive, deeply informed, and sophisticatedly nuanced in its analyses. Buy Amazon Bookshop. A powerful and convincing monograph that demonstrates the role of the American state in the making of global capitalism. Panitch and Gindin divide post-war history distinctively: the launch of the project after until the late s, focused on the revival of Western Europe and Japan; the period of crisis from until ; thereafter the turn known as neoliberalism when growth and profits revived until the crisis; and the period since the current crisis began. Sea levels will rise. Extraordinarily rich people in China India, Russia, etc. As its title suggests, the page book is a comprehensive study of the growth of a global capitalist system over more than a century. Beyond this, they do not distinguish the mechanism of imperial control between the US and non-European states, suggesting equal integration. The all-encompassing embrace of world capitalism at the beginning of the twenty-first century was generally attributed to the superiority of competitive markets. A fine work of strong scholarship. Importantly, instead of looking for the 'easy' strawman and woman Reagan and Thatcher , Panitch and Gindin return to the s and Kennedy to show the transformation of the state, and how the disappointments of the s initiated many of the crises that were to follow. Instead of taking the chance to produce a new take on an ideal solution to the modern challenges of capitalism and the feeding, clothing, and provision for seven billion people, the writers are content to retread old ground. These five countries are well-known to operate an integrated "five eyes" intelligence system but the integration of their state machineries goes far beyond intelligence gathering to include war-making, diplomacy, and economic policy coordination. The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire Writer As a socialist who long steered away from Marxism for these exact reasons, I find this a sad waste of potential. This was birth of neoliberalism in the s and the view clear after the Second World War when the militancy that it was at that point that finance was dramati- of American labour was channeled into support- cally deregulated and allowed to run wild. Feb 06, Ferhat Culfaz rated it really liked it. The Bretton Woods agreement on the international monetary order, the intervention of the US during the postwar reconstruction of Europe, along with big government efforts and the destruction of war laid the foundation for an exceptional period of growth that lasted through the end of the s. During and immediately after the war the key actors in the American state pushed set out on a strategy for America to secure an This is a superbly argued dissection of the growth of both global capitalism and American power over the last 70 years since the second world war. Much of this analysis is simply reading off the real trends and tendencies in global political economy without flinching or self-deception. David Harvey, Ellen Meiksins Wood, Giovanni Arrighi, Robert Brenner, and Perry Anderson have contributed some of the more noteworthy interventions, which we will partly address in this series. Challenging both the view of American imperialism and the decline of the state in the era of globalization as too simplistic, and drawing on numerous other works - not least of which is the work of Nicos Poulantzas and Ralph Miliband - they paint a picture of the American state which is worth learning as it provides a very sophisticated analysis of the world we live in. Methodologically, Panitch and Gindin chose to examine the construction of global capitalism through the analysis of a single state, which inevitably means some global relations are not discussed fully. We will continue to discuss the work of other authors who have developed various critical aspects of the debate around contemporary imperialism in future articles. According to Gindin and Panitch, the institutional foundations for American-led global capitalism were laid during the Great Depression of the s when the Roosevelt administration strengthened the U. In short, Marxists cannot understand capitalist development after the Second World War by mechanically extrapolating the tendencies that characterised the period of the First World War. I suspect chaos is more likely. Panitch and Gindin divide post-war history distinctively: the launch of the project after until the late s, focused on the revival of Western Europe and Japan; the period of crisis from until ; thereafter the turn known as neoliberalism when growth and profits revived until the crisis; and the period since the current crisis began. During and immediately after the war the key actors in the American state pushed set out on a strategy for America to secure and lead the capitalist world. All that is true. That can be done through direct connected to each other. I took a lot of notes and folded a lot of pages. The power of this myth is one of the many things that make this excellent analysis of 20th century global political economy so welcome. Moreover China's rate of economic growth is slowing down as it reaches middle-income status and China's population is in decline and rapidly aging. Despite change and crisis over the course of the following decades, this has remained the American state's goal. The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire Reviews The word comes from the Latin imbrex, meaning a convex roof-tile. From what I understand, this book has been in the works since the nineties, and it shows. The transition from American hegemony over a capitalist world-economy to American world-empire did not happen in a day, but September 11, is more than just a symbolic date. It ends up missing what is actually specific about this LP: It is very similar in terms of our argument kind of empire and the extent to which it actually that for the American state to have played such an operates through states and through markets, as extensive role in the world, it had to create appropri- opposed to territorial expansion. They draw a pretty straight line from the more confident, expansive, liberal-internationalist variants of US ruling-class thinking in the s to the feathered-out global capitalism of today, with little attention to the other variants of the s which included schemes to chop up Germany into half-a-dozen states, all forcibly deindustrialised and the way US policy was determined over much of the interim by Cold War imperatives. Can you elaborate on some of the ways that lation Theory. Lists with This Book. They are not two separate duction of global capitalism. What is known, based on the bitter experience of the last two decades, is that there will be more class struggle in China and there are opportunities for workers to organise as they did spectacularly in So I'm just inputting what I thought interesting: - Post WWII history of American involvement with Europe and its capitalistic expansion with americas internationalizing of finance and management styles afte the New Deal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Issues
    Global Issues Bringing Class Back In* Sam Gindin, Adjunct Professor, York University, Toronto, Canada Over the past three decades a rather astonishing change occurred in the trajectory of capitalist societies. Working class achievements that were formerly seen as examples of capitalism’s success – rising standards of living, growing economic security – were suddenly redefined as ‘problems’. Concessions and permanent insecurity became the new norm, rising inequality the new inevitability. The catch-all term to describe this was ‘neoliberalism’ and Adolph Reed, a prominent US political scientist, nicely summarized its essence as ‘capitalism without a working class opposition.’1 This succinctly highlights the kind of society we get when labour is weak. But more important, it pushes us to confront the limited resistance of labour to that rightward shift since the end of the 1970s. This period did of course witness examples of courageous struggles and moments that brought glimpses of labour’s potentials. In fact, the response of Canadian labour was generally more impressive than elsewhere. Yet given the extent of the assault on working people, labour’s response was too sporadic, too timid, and far too narrow in scope. It’s this failure that I want to discuss – not in any spirit of giving up on unions, but as part of demanding more from this crucial institution. The last time there was as profound an economic breakdown as the recent financial crisis was in the 1930s. The contrast between the labour movement’s current reaction and the earlier one couldn’t be starker. Then, with the predominantly craft-based unions reeling and trapped in exclusive, increasingly bureaucratized structures, a rebellion within the labour movement – with communists playing a prominent role – gave birth to industrial unionism, an inclusive unionism committed to organizing across skills, race and gender.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalist Crises and the Crisis This Time
    CAPITALIST CRISES AND THE CRISIS THIS TIME LEO PANITCH AND SAM GINDIN I xactly a hundred and fifty years before the current crisis began in August E2007, the collapse of the Ohio Life Insurance Company in New York triggered what became known as ‘the great crisis of 1857-8’. As it quickly spread to Europe’s main financial centres, Karl Marx ‘was delighted and thrilled by the prospects for another revolutionary upsurge on the continent’. As Michael Kratke notes, ‘the crisis started exactly as Marx had predicted already in 1850 – with a financial crisis in New York’ and the crisis itself led Marx to extend ‘the scope and scale of his study’ for the Grundrisse notebooks he was working on, so as to take account of ‘the first world economic crisis, affecting all regions of the world’. In their correspondence, Marx and Engels agreed that ‘the crisis was larger and much more severe than any crisis before’, viewing the financial crisis as ‘only the foreplay to the real crisis, the industrial crisis that would affect the very basis of British prosperity and supremacy’.1 In October 1857, Engels wrote to Marx: ‘The American crash is superb and will last for a long time... Now we have a chance’. And two weeks later: ‘…in 1848 we were saying: now our moment is coming, and in a certain sense it was, but this time it is coming completely and it is a case of life or death’.2 As the crisis abated and began to fade away in mid-1858, Marx tried to understand why it had not turned out as expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009-2010 Institute for the Humanities Annual Report 2009-2010
    University of manitoba institute for the humanities annual report 2009-2010 institute for the humanities annual report 2009-2010 index Introduction 1 message from the director 1 Publications by the Director 2 Including Director’s 2009-10 Research umih research initiative 2 LGBTTQ Archival & Oral History Initiative the research affiliates 4 Including 2009-10 Affiliate Publications the research clusters 5 Law & Society 5 Power & Resistance in Latin America 5 Jewish Studies Research Circle 7 UMIH on-campus programming 7 UMIH off-campus programming 9 Co-Sponsorships with Other Units 9 graduate student training & outreach 9 Graduate Student Public Talks 10 financial report 2009-10 10 2010-11 Asking Budget 11 Board of Management 11 institute for the humanities 12 UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA INSTITUTE FOR THE HUMANITIES ANNUAL REPORT 2009-2010 Introduction Throughout the year, the UMIH, with support from the Faculty of Arts, held a number of sessions for new scholars that attempted The constitution of the Institute requires the Director to report to provide an informal space to discuss the challenges of being a annually to the Dean of Arts, the Vice-President (Academic) and new faculty member. These sessions, normally held over lunchtime, Provost, and the Vice-President (Research). It is customary for ranged from discussing teaching and University service, to research this report to be presented annually at the year-end meeting of the potential and possibilities, as well as sources of intellectual and Board of Management. Copies are also distributed on campus to collegial support. We intend to continue this series next year and the President, the Associate Deans of Arts, the Institute’s Board of to reach out to new Faculty who are looking for potential linkages Management, and many supporters who are members of the Uni- for interdisciplinary collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx's Critique of Ideology: Its Uses and Abuses Keynote Speaker
    Society for Socialist Studies Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences June 2 – 5, 2015, University of Ottawa http://www.socialiststudies.ca Program, 28 February 2015 Kapital Ideas: analysis, critique, praxis. Kapital Ideas are theories and analyses that help point us toward a better world through critique of the unequal, violent and exploitative one we now inhabit. They take inspiration from the author of Das Kapital, though they range widely over many issues which include ecology and political economy, gender and sexuality, colonization and imperialism, communication and popular struggles, but also movements and parties, hegemony and counter hegemony, governance and globalization and, of course, class struggle and transformation. Kapital Ideas are interventions that contribute to what Marx, in 1843, called the ‘self-clarification of the struggles and wishes of the age.’ In an era of deepening crisis and proliferating struggles, of grave threats and new possibilities, the need for these ideas, and for the praxis they can inform, could not be more acute. Conference Highlights Keynote Address: Marx’s Critique of ideology: its uses and abuses Keynote Speaker: Himani Bannerji, York University Wednesday, 3 June 2015 @ 16:30-18:00 Montpetit Hall 203 Chair: TBA SSS Book Prize Wednesday, 3 June 2015 @ 18:10-19:10 Venue TBA The Rik Davidson/Studies in Political Economy 2014 Book Prize Lecture Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin, York University The Unmaking of Global Capitalism? Tuesday, 2 June 2015 @ 17:30-19:00 Montpetit Hall 201 Chair: TBA Registration TBA Tuesday, 2 June @ 8:30-10:00 a.m. Note: our first sessions begin at 9:00, so register early, or during lunch break.
    [Show full text]
  • Gindin Pamphlet FINAL
    GLOBAL ISSUES: BRINGING CLASS BACK IN Sam Gindin Socialist Interventions Pamphlet Series This pamphlet series is meant to encourage principled debate amongst the left and the working class to advance a viable socialist movement in Canada. Democratic debate is encouraged within and beyond the Socialist Project. 1. Sam Gindin (2004). The Auto Industry: Concretizing Working Class Solidarity: Internationalism Beyond Slogans. 2. Leo Panitch (2005). Whose Violence? Imperial State Security and the Global Justice Movement. 3. Carlos Torres, et al (2005). The Unexpected Revolution: The Venezuelan People Confront Neoliberalism. 4. Hugh Armstrong, et al (2005). Whose Health Care? Challenging the Corporate Struggle to Rule Our System. 5. Labour Committee (2007). The Crisis in Manufacturing Jobs. 6. Richard Roman and Edur Velasco Arregui (2008). The Oaxaca Commune: The Other Indigenous Rebellion in Mexico. 7. Labour Committee - Socialist Project (2008). Labour Movement Platform. 8. Michael A. Lebowitz (2009). The Path to Human Development: Capitalism or Socialism? 9. Socialist Project (2009). Financial Meltdown: Canada, the Economic Crisis and Political Struggle. 10. Marta Harnecker (2010). Ideas for the Struggle. 11 . Angela Joya, et al (2011). The Arab Revolts Against Neoliberal Economies: Confronting Capitalism? 12. Stefan Kipfer, et al. (2012). Free Transit. 13. Greg Albo and Carlo Fanelli (2014). Austerity Against Democracy: An Authoritarian Phase of Neoliberalism? 14. Sam Gindin (2015). Global Issues: Bringing Class Back In To download these pamphlets and to learn more about the Socialist Project, see our website at www.socialistproject.ca Global Issues Bringing Class Back In Making Workers ………………………………. 6 Canadian Exceptionalism ……………………. 11 Disorganizing the Class ………………………. 13 Getting From Here to There ………………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of American Economic Power in Global Capitalism: from the 1960S Into the Twenty-First Century
    The Persistence of American Economic Power in Global Capitalism: From the 1960s into the Twenty-First Century Sean Kenji Starrs A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA June 2014 © Sean Kenji Starrs, 2014 Abstract This dissertation intervenes in the more than four decades-long debate on the decline or persistence of American economic power. It argues that we cannot move forward without reconceptualizing the nature of economic power in global capitalism, especially by moving beyond national accounts (such as GDP). Too many commentators from across the diversity of perspectives assume that the relative rise and decline of national accounts approximates the relative rise and decline of national economic power. In contrast, this dissertation argues that in the era of globalization, national accounts are an inadequate measure of national economic power. Rather, we must investigate the transnational corporations themselves in order to encompass their transnational operations, and analyze the matrix of inter- linkages now characteristic of global capitalism in general, and American power in particular. Therefore, this dissertation draws upon extensive original empirical research, including the following: 1) the first aggregation of the national sales- shares of the world’s top 200 corporations from 1957 to 2013; 2) the first aggregation of the national profit-shares of the world’s top 2,000 corporations across 25 broad sectors from 2006 to 2013; 3) the first aggregation of the top 50 national acquirers and targets of all cross-border mergers and acquisitions worth $1 million or more from 1980 to 2012; and 4) the first national aggregation of the ownership structures of the world’s top 500 corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Global Capitalism
    Contents Preface vii INTRODUCTION 1 PART I: PRELUDE TO THE NEW AMERICAN EMPIRE . The DNA of American Capitalism 25 The Dynamic Economy 26 The Active State 31 Internationalizing the American State 35 . American State Capacities: From Great War to New Deal 45 From Wilson to Hoover: Isolationism Not 46 The Great Depression and the New Deal State 53 From New Deal to Grand Truce with Capital 59 PART II: THE PROJECT FOR A GLOBAL CAPITALISM . Planning the New American Empire 67 Internationalizing the New Deal 69 The Path to Bretton Woods 72 Laying the Domestic Foundations 80 . Launching Global Capitalism 89 Evolving the Marshall Plan 91 The American Rescue of European Capitalism 96 “The Rest of the World” 102 PART III: THE TRANSITION TO GLOBAL CAPITALISM . The Contradictions of Success 111 Internationalizing Production 112 Internationalizing Finance 117 Detaching from Bretton Woods 122 . Structural Power Through Crisis 133 Class, Profi ts, and Crisis 135 Transition through Crisis 144 Facing the Crisis Together 152 PART IV: THE REALIZATION OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM . Renewing Imperial Capacity 163 The Path to Discipline 164 The New Age of Finance 172 The Material Base of Empire 183 . Integrating Global Capitalism 195 Integrating Europe 196 Japan’s Contradictions of Success 203 The Rest of the World (Literally) 211 PART V: THE RULE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM . Rules of Law: Governing Globalization 223 The Laws of Free Trade 224 Global Investment, American Rules 230 Disciplinary Internationalism 234 . The New Imperial Challenge: Managing Crises 247 Firefi ghter in Chief 248 The Asian Contagion 254 Failure Containment 261 PART VI: THE GLOBAL CAPITALIST MILLENNIUM .
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL CAPITALISM and AMERICAN EMPIRE Leo Panitch
    1 GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND AMERICAN EMPIRE Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin ‘American imperialism… has been made plausible and attractive in part by the insistence that it is not imperialistic.’ 1 Harold Innis, 1948 Este material aparecerá publicado en Socialist Register del 2004, y la revista nos autorizó a divulgarlo durante seis meses en la web Cuba Siglo XXI The American empire is no longer concealed. In March 1999, the cover of the New York Times Magazine displayed a giant clenched fist painted in the stars and stripes of the US flag above the words: ‘What The World Needs Now: For globalization to work, America can’t be afraid to act like the almighty superpower that it is’. Thus was featured Thomas Friedman’s ‘Manifesto for a Fast World’, which urged the United States to embrace its role as enforcer of the capitalist global order: ‘…the hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist.... The hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley’s technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.’ Four years later, in January 2003, when there was no longer any point in pretending the fist was hidden, the Magazine featured an essay by Michael Ignatieff entitled ‘The Burden’: ‘…[W]hat word but “empire” describes the awesome thing that America is becoming? …Being an imperial power… means enforcing such order as there is in the world and doing so in the American interest.’2 The words, ‘The American Empire: (Get Used To It)’, took up the whole cover of the Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stagflation of the 1970S Начало Падения Америки
    Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 2021 Vol. 21 No. 2 243—251 http://journals.rudn.ru/international‐relations Вестник РУДН. Серия: МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-2-243-251 Research article / Научная статья Prelude to America’s Downfall: The Stagflation of the 1970s Vassilis K. Fouskas 1 University of East London, London, Great Britain [email protected] Abstract. Since the end of the Bretton Woods system and the stagflation of the 1970s, the transatlantic core, under the leadership of the United States of America, has been trying to expand its model of free market capitalism embracing every part of the globe, while addressing its domestic overaccumulation crisis. This article follows a historical methodological perspective and draws from the concept of Uneven and Combined Development (UCD), which helps us consider the structural reasons behind the long and protracted decline of the American economic power. In this respect, according to the UCD concept, there is no global power that can enjoy the privilege for being at the top of the global capitalist system forever in a world which develops unevenly and in a combined way. Power shifts across the world and new powers come to challenge the current hegemonic power and its alliance systems. The novelty of the article is that it locates this decline in the 1970s and considers it as being consubstantial with the state economic policy of neo-liberalism and financialisation (supply-side economics). However the financialised capitalism of the transatlantic assemblage lack industrial base producing, reproducing and recycling real commodity values. Further, the article shows that this attempt to remain at the top of the global capitalist system forever has not been successful, not least because the regime which the recovery of the core had rested upon, that of neo-liberal financialisation represents a major vulnerability of the transatlantic assemblage eroding the primacy of the United States of America in it.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Manitoba Department of Economics
    University of Manitoba Department of Economics Economics 7690 Structuralist Theories of Development John Loxley Fall 2013 505 Fletcher Argue 474-9769 e-mail, [email protected] Objectives To acquaint students with competing non-orthodox theories of development and their evolution over time. The course will begin with a review of the main currents in orthodox theories of, and approaches to, development economics. It will then consider a variety of alternative approaches beginning with Latin American structuralism and its differences from ‘Anglo-Saxon’ structuralism. The debates about the original transition to capitalism will then be examined as will the Japanese transition which differed significantly from that in Europe. This will be followed by analysis of Marx’s writings on colonialism and their validity, as a segué into Neo-Marxian theories and the Staple Theory (as applied to Canadian and Aboriginal economic development). Feminist and ecological theories of development will also be studied. Theoretical issues in contemporary capitalism and the new imperialism will be addressed, as will the debates about structural adjustment and its role in the neo-liberal re-shaping of the global economy. The reasons behind the growing power of India and China will also be looked at. Post-development theory will be appraised critically. Other possible topics will be the role of institutions in development, contemporary debates about the role of aid, the nature and role of social capital, sustainable livelihoods and social inclusion. Where appropriate, the course will examine the strategies of development which appear to follow logically from the various theories. It will emphasise the richness of debate within the literature and highlight the principal issues which remain controversial or unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis and Economic Alternatives
    THE CRISIS AND ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES GREG ALBO ince 2008, the world market has been wracked by a degree of economic Sturbulence unusual in its scope, depth and duration. Although uneven in its recessionary impacts, no corner of the global economy has been untouched by this. In the central economies of North America, Japan and Europe, this period has been universally demarcated as a ‘major crisis’, comparable to the ‘great depressions’ of the late nineteenth century and the 1930s and the stagflation of the 1970s. Even as the crisis now presses into its fifth year, economic prospects remain highly uncertain. In cataloguing obstacles to a renewal of economic growth in various parts of the world, the July 2012 IMF World Economic Outlook observes, with a tone of understatement, that ‘the global recovery, which was not so strong to begin with, has shown further signs of weakness’.1 As in other major turning points in the history of capitalism, powerful forces for restructuring the state and the economy have been set in motion. From both sides of the political spectrum, governments have been falling like dominos. In Italy and Greece, ‘technocratic governments’ were struck while in others something like a ‘common front’ formed between centre- right and social democratic parties to back the bailouts of the financial system and secure long-term policies of ‘fiscal consolidation’ (read austerity). This has kept even more interventionist economic policies within the parameters of ‘exceptional monetarism’ (along the lines advocated by Ben Bernanke of the US Federal Reserve), thereby seeking a balance between fiscal austerity and the ‘quantitative easing’ of monetary policy and debt consolidation to stabilize the financial system.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCI 501 Capitalism Socialism Democracy Syllabus Winter 2020
    DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY SOCI 501: Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Winter Semester 2020 Meeting Times: Professor: Barry Eidlin Tuesdays 8:35-10:25 ([email protected]) Location: Leacock 819 Office: Leacock 820 Office Hours: Tue. 10:45-12:45 COURSE OBJECTIVES While this course has only recently come to McGill, it arrives with a storied history. It was originally developed in the early 20th century at the University of Wisconsin–Madison by the pioneering labour economist John R. Commons, who passed it down to his student Selig Perlman, also a labour economist of considerable renown. After World War II, the famous German emigré sociologist Hans Gerth, known for his translations of the works of Max Weber, took it over. Perlman’s lectures for this course have been published as Selig Perlman's Lectures on Capitalism and Socialism (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1976). The course was originally designed to explore the distinctive, some would say “exceptional,” U.S. political and economic landscape, and how it came to be that way. While it is a landscape that has fostered historically unprecedented levels of economic growth and prosperity for some, it has also led to levels of poverty and inequality that are unmatched among comparable countries. In this redesigned version of the course, we will be enriching this analysis of American exceptionalism by comparing the U.S. with Canada. While both countries are similar in many ways, they have important differences when it comes to politics and social policy. Exploring and explaining why those differences exist can help us better understand both countries.
    [Show full text]