Fragrance May Be Sites, Or Receptors, in the Lining of the Nasal Cavity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fragrance May Be Sites, Or Receptors, in the Lining of the Nasal Cavity florolo gy 101 By Kirk Pamper AIFD, AAF, PFCI among thousands of odors. Scientists have identified a large family of genes in our DNA that they believe are coded for specific odor binding Fragrance may be sites, or receptors, in the lining of the nasal cavity. It’s estimated that there are as many as 10 million the floral attribute olfactory cells in humans. (Don’t feel too smug— dogs have 20 times that many.) These receptor that is most cells are relatively long. At one end are the olfactory cilia—slender, hair-like structures that powerful and least bind to the specific molecules of an odor. The cilia are attached to the olfactory neurons, which understood. generate electrical signals that travel directly to the olfactory bulb, a rounded structure at the front Flowers are intrinsically associated with fragrance. of the brain, located directly above the nose. In the Almost everyone, when presented with a bouquet or olfactory bulb, information from the receptors is even a single blossom, will immediately bring it to organized into patterns that the brain then his or her nose to see how good it smells. It’s one of interprets as different odors. the things that make us value and appreciate flowers as much as we do. In fact, it’s so important The olfactory bulb is part of the brain’s limbic that the newly published AIFD Guide to Floral Design: system—primitive brain structures that govern Terms, Techniques, and Traditions identifies it as one emotions, behavior, and memory storage. The of the elements of floral design. limbic system is one of the oldest and most vital parts of the brain. In fact, a very important aspect How is it that the fragrance of flowers affects of smell is that olfactory neurons make up the us so strongly? What purpose does it only sensory pathway that is in direct contact with serve for the flowers the brain. For most animals, it is a primary mode themselves? And if it’s so of communication that influences many important important, why are so functions, including reproduction and taste. This is many florist flowers one reason why our olfactory memories are relatively weak in among the most powerful. They frequently have fragrance? strong emotional qualities and are associated with the good or bad experiences in which they Let’s first take a look occurred (a fact that florists can use to good at how olfaction (the advantage). Olfactory information travels not only technical term for to the limbic system, however, but also to the the sense of smell) brain’s cortex, or outer layer, where conscious operates in thought occurs. humans. The human olfactory Plants create fragrance by producing volatile system can distinguish (easily vaporized) compounds that emanate from Flo we rs& the surface of their petals, leaves and There are some flowers that don’t smell biological purpose is to be pollinated so technology to consider resurrecting scents other tissues. Scientists have so far very good at all, at least to the human that it can produce the next generation of in flowers that have long since lost them, identified about 1,000 of these chemicals. nose. For example, a succulent plant seeds, it makes evolutionary sense that a and as genetic engineering progresses, However, there are many more as yet to known as the carrion flower (Stapelia short-lived flower might generate a strong we may start seeing plants that produce be isolated, and there can be as many as giganteum) produces blossoms that smell perfume that can quickly attract a fragrances that have never before been 50 or 100 different chemicals involved in very much like rotted meat, which is an pollinator, whereas a longer-lasting experienced by a bee, beetle, or florist. generating a particular scent. In roses enticing aroma to the flies that pollinate it. blossom has a much greater window of alone, more than 80 distinct fragrance The overpowering stench of the titan arum opportunity in which to become pollinated. compounds have been identified. Imagine (Amorphophallus titanium), a gigantic This is one reason why so many of our Designer fragrance, the possible combinations—each one member of the Aroid family, is enough to “florist” roses don’t have much fragrance; anyone? different from every other! These knock a horse over, yet it’s so irresistible in trying to develop more attractive Despite the fact that fragrance is so compounds function in the manner of to dung beetles that they will chew their blossoms with longer vase lives, plant strongly associated with flowers in the enzymes, with distinct molecular shapes way through the inflorescence to get at breeders have focused on selecting genes mind of the consumer, floral designers for that fit precisely with specific receptors in the pollen inside. To give you an idea of that produce those traits rather than genes the most part haven’t added it into their the nasal cavity. This is the reason why what the arum smells like, two of the responsible for fragrance. the second sniff of a fragrant flower isn’t organic compounds that are partly conscious calculations of the elements within their compositions. We know when as powerful as the first; the receptors are responsible for its odor are putrescine and It turns out that there is actually a it’s there of course; yet, we’ve tended to bound up with the molecules from the first cadaverine, both of which are also negative relationship between the genes overlook it as we pay more attention to sniff. Typically, only a few of the volatile produced during the decomposition of that are responsible for vase life and those the visual impact of our designs rather chemicals in a fragrance are obviously rotting proteins. that control fragrance. Some of the same than the olfactory. We haven’t really noticeable to human noses, and no two chemicals that plants use to make learned how to combine and layer people experience an odor the same way. Flowers tend to be most fragrant when fragrance have been shown to shorten fragrances in the way that the perfume In other words, a rose may smell sweeter they have sufficient nutrition, which is one vase life. These are the natural plant trade, for example, has. And that’s a to some people than to others. more reason why the use of commercial chemicals that respond to hormones like shame, because, as we’ve already seen, flower foods is important. In addition, ethylene, which is a ripening hormone and memories associated with the sense of moderate to warm temperatures and high gas that causes flowers to wilt. As Calling all pollinators smell can be among the most powerful we light tend to increase fragrance. Many breeders selected plants that made less of Why do flowers smell good (or bad) in the experience. Numerous studies have flowers display a circadian cycle in the those chemicals in order to achieve long- first place? The answer is simple: proven that pleasant fragrances simply production of fragrance, with the scent lasting cut flowers, they also may have advertising. The basic biological purpose of make us feel and perform better. being strongest at certain times of the day removed the plants’ abilities to produce flower fragrance is to advertise to insects Aromatherapists have built a multi- or night. This phenomenon too is related floral scent. The same holds true for or other pollinators that food (in the form million-dollar industry around that fact. to the activities of the flowers’ pollinators. potted and garden plants as well. For of nectar or pollen) is available, or to fool Snapdragons, for instance, are most example, the cyclamen used to have a them into believing that sex is a possibility But florists can indulge in a little fragrant during the day when pollinating fragrant flower. (some flowers emit a scent that resembles bees are likely to be most active. Perhaps aromatherapy ourselves. We already do so the pheremonal essence of sexually on occasion; how many times have you you’ve noticed that the fragrance of Furthermore, pigment compounds (those receptive members of certain insect gathered around the design bench just to Stargazer lilies becomes stronger at night, that produce color in a flower) are derived species). Thus captivated, the insect visits catch a whiff as someone was about to which would indicate that these and from some of the same biochemical the flower, looking for a meal or a mate. If open a fresh box of gardenias or related species are likely to be pollinated precursors as scent compounds are. So all goes well (for the flower that is), the stephanotis? By learning which of the by a nocturnal insect such as a moth. It it’s logical that if you make more of one insect will take some pollen with it when it cultivars among the many hundreds would be a waste of a flower’s energy to you get less of the other, and as flower leaves and deposit it on the stigma of available to us have the best fragrances advertise to insects that don’t even breeders have sought to create an ever- another blossom of the same species as and practicing combining them in different pollinate them. widening spectrum of colors among the the first, thereby cross-pollinating the ways, we can elevate floral design to a estimated 18,000 rose cultivars now on plants. Even if the pollinator is one that’s new dimension, sharing a kind of the market, fragrance has very often gone drawn by the color or shape of a blossom, Trade-offs aromatherapy with our customers.
Recommended publications
  • Scent As a Medium for Design: an Experimental Design Inquiry
    Scent as a Medium for Design: An Experimental Design Inquiry A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Master of Fine Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alessandra Cerqueira Mattos, MBA Graduate Program in Industrial, Interior and Visual Communication Design The Ohio State University 2011 Master’s Examination Committee Professors Peter Chan, Advisor, PhD Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders, PhD Carolina Gill Copyright by Alessandra Cerqueira Mattos © 2011 All rights reserved Abstract The roles of Designers and Researchers are blending together and each one is trying to work in and improve on the other’s domain. This represents an important shift for both fields, but it is fundamental that the next steps are taken by studying and acquiring more knowledge across both fields. Thus, this study aims to adapt Experimental Design as a method to be used by Designers. The use of experiments as a method for Design Research is a relatively unexplored domain within the field of Design that has implications for positive and useful applications. With the application of rigorous methods of experimental study, results can be generalized to broader situations. Scientific methods address concern of bias, replication, and disclosure of the problem and findings. Experimentally-based findings will be well respected not only by Designers, but also by the Scientific community. The experiment consisted of interviews with ninety people who were asked to associate the presented smells with words. Quantitative analysis was done using statistical tests to understand whether people’s responses did or did not occur by ii chance.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Wells Harbor Ecology (Materials from the Wells NERR)
    APPENDICES Appendix B Wells Harbor Ecology (materials from the Wells NERR) CHAPTER 8 Vegetation Caitlin Mullan Crain lants are primary producers that use photosynthesis ter). In this chapter, we will describe what these vegeta- to convert light energy into carbon. Plants thus form tive communities look like, special plant adaptations for Pthe base of all food webs and provide essential nutrition living in coastal habitats, and important services these to animals. In coastal “biogenic” habitats, the vegetation vegetative communities perform. We will then review also engineers the environment, and actually creates important research conducted in or affiliated with Wells the habitat on which other organisms depend. This is NERR on the various vegetative community types, giving particularly apparent in coastal marshes where the plants a unique view of what is known about coastal vegetative themselves, by trapping sediments and binding the communities of southern Maine. sediment with their roots, create the peat base and above- ground structure that defines the salt marsh. The plants OASTAL EGETATION thus function as foundation species, dominant C V organisms that modify the physical environ- Macroalgae ment and create habitat for numerous dependent Algae, commonly known as seaweeds, are a group of organisms. Other vegetation types in coastal non-vascular plants that depend on water for nutrient systems function in similar ways, particularly acquisition, physical support, and seagrass beds or dune plants. Vegetation is reproduction. Algae are therefore therefore important for numerous reasons restricted to living in environ- including transforming energy to food ments that are at least occasionally sources, increasing biodiversity, and inundated by water.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Scent Evolution in the Genus Jaborosa (Solanaceae): Influence of Ecological and Environmental Factors
    plants Article Floral Scent Evolution in the Genus Jaborosa (Solanaceae): Influence of Ecological and Environmental Factors Marcela Moré 1,* , Florencia Soteras 1, Ana C. Ibañez 1, Stefan Dötterl 2 , Andrea A. Cocucci 1 and Robert A. Raguso 3,* 1 Laboratorio de Ecología Evolutiva y Biología Floral, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Córdoba), Córdoba CP 5000, Argentina; [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (A.C.I.); [email protected] (A.A.C.) 2 Department of Biosciences, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; [email protected] 3 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (R.A.R.) Abstract: Floral scent is a key communication channel between plants and pollinators. However, the contributions of environment and phylogeny to floral scent composition remain poorly understood. In this study, we characterized interspecific variation of floral scent composition in the genus Jaborosa Juss. (Solanaceae) and, using an ecological niche modelling approach (ENM), we assessed the environmental variables that exerted the strongest influence on floral scent variation, taking into account pollination mode and phylogenetic relationships. Our results indicate that two major evolutionary themes have emerged: (i) a ‘warm Lowland Subtropical nectar-rewarding clade’ with large white hawkmoth pollinated flowers that emit fragrances dominated by oxygenated aromatic or Citation: Moré, M.; Soteras, F.; sesquiterpenoid volatiles, and (ii) a ‘cool-temperate brood-deceptive clade’ of largely fly-pollinated Ibañez, A.C.; Dötterl, S.; Cocucci, species found at high altitudes (Andes) or latitudes (Patagonian Steppe) that emit foul odors including A.A.; Raguso, R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthurium Fragrance: Genetic and Biochemical Studies
    ANTHURIUM FRAGRANCE: GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HORTICULTURE DECEMBER 1997 By Nuttha Kuanprasert Dissertation Committee: Adelheid R. Kuehnle, Chairperson Chung-Shih Tang Catherine Cavaletto Richard Criley Richard M. Manshardt David T. Webb We certify that we have read this dissertation and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Horticulture. DISSERTATION COMMITTEE 1^-hXLu.AA fl 16^1—^ Chairperson M HL > L x6 © Copyright 1997 by Nuttha Kuanprasert All Rights Reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am very grateful to my advisor, Dr. Adelheid R. Kuehnle for her valuable advice and support throughout the dissertation process and also for her assistance in editing my manuscript. I would like to thank my committee members: Dr. C. S. Tang for his guidance in chemical analysis, Ms. Catherine Cavaletto for her instruction in fragrance evaluation. Dr. Richard Criley for providing useful and relevant articles and abstracts. Dr. Richard M. Manshardt for his support and comments, and Dr. David T. Webb for his long-term assistance in histological study. I extend my sincere thanks to Emeritus Professor Haruyuki Kamemoto. I truly enjoyed the numerous hours we spent working in the nursery. Through this experience, I gained invaluable knowledge about general horticultural techniques and philosophy of life. 1 would like to extend my gratitude to Dr. Teresita Amore for her kind assistance and suggestions, Ms. Nellie Sugii, and lab members for their friendship and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Scent and Nectar Sugar Composition of Temnadenia Odorifera (Apocynoideae, Apocynaceae)
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20180188 J. Braz. Chem. Soc., Vol. 30, No. 2, 388-397, 2019 Printed in Brazil - ©2019 Sociedade Brasileira de Química Article Floral Scent and Nectar Sugar Composition of Temnadenia odorifera (Apocynoideae, Apocynaceae) Rafael F. Silva, a,b Natália A. B. Tinoco,a Anna Tsukui,a Cristiana Koschnitzke,c Inara C. Silva-Batista,c Claudia M. Rezendea and Humberto R. Bizzo *,b,d aLaboratório de Análise de Aromas, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil bInstituto de Pesquisas de Produtos Naturais, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil cDepartamento de Botânica, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil dEmbrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos, Av. das Américas, 29501, 23020-470 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil Temnadenia odorifera is an endemic species from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. This study was developed in order to identify the volatile compounds emitted by the living flowers and nectar, to evaluate the temporal pattern of scent emission, and the sugars composition of its nectar. Analyses of the flower scent by dynamic headspace in vivo, of nectar sugar composition and studies on floral biology were performed. Twenty-three volatile compounds were identified in the flowers scent. The total amount of odor emitted by flowers varied significantly throughout anthesis, ranging from 10232.7 ng g-1 (9 to 12 h) to 620.2 ng g-1 (15 to 18 h). 2-Phenylethanol and (E)-cinnamyl alcohol were the major compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Floral Scent Compounds in Intraspecific
    molecules Article A Comparative Analysis of Floral Scent Compounds in Intraspecific Cultivars of Prunus mume with Different Corolla Colours Tengxun Zhang y, Fei Bao y , Yongjuan Yang, Ling Hu , Anqi Ding, Aiqin Ding, Jia Wang, Tangren Cheng and Qixiang Zhang * Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding; National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture; Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment; Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education; School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] (T.Z.); [email protected] (F.B.); [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (L.H.); [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (T.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this study. y Received: 20 November 2019; Accepted: 24 December 2019; Published: 30 December 2019 Abstract: Prunus mume is the only fragrant flowering species of Prunus. According to the previous studies, benzyl acetate and eugenol dominate its floral scent. However, the diversity of its floral scents remains to be elucidated. In this work, the floral volatiles emitted from eight intraspecific cultivars of P. mume with white, pink and red flowers, were collected and analyzed using headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatograms-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). In total, 31 volatile compounds were identified, in which phenylpropanoids/benzenoids accounted for over 95% of the total emission amounts. Surprisingly, except for benzyl acetate and eugenol, several novel components, such as benzyl alcohol, cinnamyl acohol, cinnamy acetate, and benzyl benzoate were found in some cultivars.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Volatiles Structure Plant-Pollinator Interactions in a Diverse Community Across the Growing Season
    Received: 8 April 2019 | Accepted: 26 July 2019 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13424 RESEARCH ARTICLE Floral volatiles structure plant–pollinator interactions in a diverse community across the growing season Laura A. Burkle1 | Justin B. Runyon2 1Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana Abstract 2Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA 1. While the importance of floral odours for pollinator attraction relative to visual Forest Service, Bozeman, Montana cues is increasingly appreciated, how they structure community‐level plant–pol- Correspondence linator interactions is poorly understood. Elucidating the functional roles of flow- Laura A. Burkle ering plant species with respect to their floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs) Email: [email protected] and how those roles vary over the growing season is an initial step towards under- Funding information standing the contribution of floral VOCs to plant–pollinator interaction structure. USDA Forest Service; Montana State University 2. We sampled the floral VOCs, phenologies and bee visitors of naturally growing plants in a montane meadow in the Northern Rocky Mountains of USA in order Handling Editor: Jessamyn Manson to acquire a base understanding of how floral VOCs and other plant traits may structure plant–pollinator interactions across the growing season. We expected forb species with floral VOCs that were original (far from the community mean) and unique (far from the nearest neighbour) would have few pollinating partners (i.e. specialists), while forbs with non‐original or highly variable floral VOCs would form the generalist core of interactors, thereby contributing to network nested- ness (specialists interacting with nested subsets of generalists). Network modu- larity (patterns of distinct, highly connected subnetworks) could be influenced by groups of pollinators that are attracted to or repelled by certain floral bouquets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Olfactory Neuroecology of Herbivory, Hostplant Selection and Plant–Pollinator Interactions Winnie W
    Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, volume 56, number 5, pp. 856–864 doi:10.1093/icb/icw096 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology SYMPOSIUM The Olfactory Neuroecology of Herbivory, Hostplant Selection and Plant–Pollinator Interactions Winnie W. Ho and Jeffrey A. Riffell1 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/56/5/856/2420627 by guest on 28 September 2021 From the symposium ‘‘Neuroecology: Neural Mechanisms of Sensory and Motor Processes that Mediate Ecologically Relevant Behaviors’’ presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2016 at Portland, Oregon. 1E-mail: [email protected] Synopsis Plants experience often opposing energetic demands and selective pressures—for instance, where plants need to attract an insect that is both the pollinator and herbivore, or alternately, where plants attract prey (due to limited resources) and pollinators. Together, these selective pressures can modify the volatile signals available to the plant’s mutualistic and antagonistic partners. Nevertheless, it remains an open question how changes in the information content of volatile signals modify behavioral responses in mutualists and antagonists, and what the underlying neural bases of these behaviors are. This review focuses on two systems to explore the impact of herbivory and resource availability on plant–pollinator interactions: hawkmoth-pollinated hostplants (where herbivory is common), and carnivorous bee- pollinated pitcher plants (where the plants differentially attract bee pollinators and other insect prey). We focus on (1) the volatile signals emitted from these plants because these volatiles operate as long-distance signals to attract, or deter, insect partners, (2) how this information is processed in the hawkmoth olfactory system, and (3) how volatile information changes spatiotemporally.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Scent Collection at the Perfume Flowers of Anthurium Rubrinervium (Araceae) by the Klepto- Parasitic Orchid Bee Aglae Caerulea (Euglossini)
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ECOTROPICA 13: 149–155, 2007 © Society for Tropical Ecology FLORAL SCENT COLLECTION AT THE PERFUME FLOWERS OF ANTHURIUM RUBRINERVIUM (ARACEAE) BY THE KLEPTO- PARASITIC ORCHID BEE AGLAE CAERULEA (EUGLOSSINI) Heiko Hentrich 1, Roman Kaiser 2 & Gerhard Gottsberger 3 1 Institut für Systematische Botanik und Ökologie, Universität Ulm, 89069 Ulm, Germany 2 Givaudan Fragrance Research, Ueberlandstrasse 138, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland 3 Botanischer Garten und Herbarium, Universität Ulm, 89069 Ulm, Germany Key words: Anthurium rubrinervium, Araceae, Aglae caerulea, Euglossini, fragrance collection, floral fragrances, French Guiana. INTRODUCTION leads to the presumption that they do so. Morpholo- gically, the males are provided with the same features Orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) are for scent collection (foretarsal brushes, inflated hind known to be important pollinators in the tropics of tibia) as their relatives in the other Euglossini genera the New World (Dodson 1966, Vogel 1966, Dressler (Sakagami 1965, Vogel 1966, Kimsey 1987, Miche- 1982, Roubik & Hanson 2004). They became par- ticularly famous for the scent-collecting behavior of ner 2000). Moreover, they are attracted to artificial the males on the perfume flowers of various orchid fragrance compounds (eugenol, methyl cinnamate, p- species and of many other plant families (Vogel 1966, cresol, skatole; Williams & Dodson 1972, Morato Dodson et al. 1969). The tribe Euglossini is divided 2001, Ramírez et al. 2002), which are components into five genera (Aglae, Eufriesea, Euglossa, Eulaema, of natural floral scent (Williams & Whitten 1983, Exaerete; Kimsey 1987), with a similar distribution Gerlach & Schill 1991, Knudsen et al. 1993). for all but one genus (Aglae), ranging from northern This is the first documentation of the scent-col- Mexico to Argentina (Michener 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Diversity of Floral Scent Chemistry in the Euglossine Bee-Pollinated Orchid Genus Gongora
    Annals of Botany 118: 135–148, 2016 doi:10.1093/aob/mcw072, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org PART OF A HIGHLIGHT ON ORCHID BIOLOGY Evolution and diversity of floral scent chemistry in the euglossine bee-pollinated orchid genus Gongora Molly C. Hetherington-Rauth1,2 and Santiago R. Ramırez2,* 1Biology Department, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada and 2Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA *For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 15 December 2015 Returned for revision: 29 February 2016 Accepted: 16 March 2016 Published electronically: 30 May 2016 Background and Aims Animal-pollinated angiosperms have evolved a variety of signalling mechanisms to at- tract pollinators. Floral scent is a key component of pollinator attraction, and its chemistry modulates both pollinator behaviour and the formation of plant–pollinator networks. The neotropical orchid genus Gongora exhibits special- ized pollinator associations with male orchid bees (Euglossini). Male bees visit orchid flowers to collect volatile chemical compounds that they store in hind-leg pouches to use subsequently during courtship display. Hence, Gongora floral scent compounds simultaneously serve as signalling molecules and pollinator rewards. Furthermore, because floral scent acts as the predominant reproductive isolating barrier among lineages, it has been hypothesized that chemical traits are highly species specific. A comparative analysis of intra- and inter-specific variation of floral scent chemistry was conducted to investigate the evolutionary patterns across the genus. Methods Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to analyse the floral scent of 78 individuals belonging to 28 different species of Gongora from two of the three major lineages sampled across the neotropical region.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Scents Repel Potentially Nectar-Thieving Ants
    Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2008, 10: 295–308 Floral scents repel potentially nectar-thieving ants Robert R. Junker and Nico Blüthgen* Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany ABSTRACT Hypothesis: Repellent floral volatiles are responsible for ants’ conspicuous absence from flowers. Organisms: A broad spectrum of flowers (32 species for volatiles, 72 for nectar tests) was screened for their effect on different ant species. Methods: The ants’ responses to floral scent bouquets and to individual floral volatiles were tested in a modified Pettersson four-arm olfactometer. Flower nectar was extracted with micro-capillaries and offered to ants to observe whether they accepted or rejected the nectar. Results: While ants readily consumed almost all nectar offered to them, they were significantly repelled by a high proportion of floral scent bouquets. Repellent effects were confirmed for individual terpenoids commonly found in floral scents. Repellent floral scents provided an unequivocal explanation for the distribution of Formica rufibarbis ants among nectar-bearing flowers in situ. Conclusions: This is the first clear demonstration that ant repellence from flowers is triggered by naturally emitted floral volatiles. This suggests that floral scents may function as allomones against enemies and not solely as synomones to attract mutualists. Keywords: allomones, antagonists, floral traits, mutualism exploitation, nectar, olfactometer, repellence, terpenoids.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Toxic to Horses
    Plants Toxic to Horses Adam-and-Eve (Arum, Lord-and-Ladies, Wake Robin, Starch Root, Bobbins, Cuckoo Plant) | Scientific Names: Arum maculatum | Family: Araceae African Wonder Tree () | Scientific Names: Ricinus communis | Family: Alocasia (Elephant's Ear) | Scientific Names: Alocasia spp. | Family: Araceae Aloe () | Scientific Names: Aloe vera | Family: Liliaceae Alsike Clover () | Scientific Names: Trifolium hybridum | Family: Leguminosae Amaryllis (Many, including: Belladonna lily, Saint Joseph lily, Cape Belladonna, Naked Lady) | Scientific Names: Amaryllis spp. | Family:Amaryllidaceae Ambrosia Mexicana (Jerusalem Oak, Feather Geranium) | Scientific Names: Chenopodium botrys | Family: Chenopodiaceae American Bittersweet (Bittersweet, Waxwork, Shrubby Bittersweet, False Bittersweet, Climbing Bittersweet) | Scientific Names: Celastrus scandens| Family: Celastraceae American Holly (English Holly, European Holly, Oregon Holly, Inkberry, Winterberry) | Scientific Names: Ilex opaca | Family: Aquifoliaceae American Mandrake (Mayapple, Indian Apple Root, Umbrella Leaf, Wild Lemon, Hog Apple, Duck's Foot, Raccoonberry) | Scientific Names:Podophyllum peltatum | Family: Berberidaceae American Yew (Canada Yew, Canadian Yew) | Scientific Names: Taxus canadensus | Family: Taxaceae Andromeda Japonica (Pieris, Lily-of-the-Valley Bush) | Scientific Names: Pieris japonica | Family: Ericaceae Angelica Tree (Hercules' Club, Devil's Walking Stick, Prickly Ash, Prickly Elder) | Scientific Names: Aralia spinosa | Family: Araliaceae Apple (Includes crabapples)
    [Show full text]