© Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 tIcf k¿°m¿ dated 5-9-2012 with RNI Government of Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2015-17 2015 tIcf Kkddv KERALA GAZETTE B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

2015 tabv 12 Xncph\¥]pcw, 12th May 2015 hmeyw 4 \º¿ sNmΔ 1190 taSw 28 28th Medam 1190 19 Vol. IV } , No. } 1937 sshimJw 22 Tuesday 22nd Vaisakha 1937

PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Skills Department Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Labour and Skills (A) Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct ORDERS that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication (1) to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. G.O. (Rt.) No. 332/2015/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. ANNEXURE Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Whether the transfer of Sri Dinesh Kumar, Field industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri. Agni Chacko, Executive, and Rejith, T., Marketing Executive Vice President, Sri Ram City Union Finance Limited, (Working in Kadappakada, Sri Ram City Union C.C. No. 40/374, Jose Junction, 2nd Floor, Jose Annexe, Finance Limited Branch) by the management of M.G. Road, Ernakulam (2) Sri Rajagopal, State Head, Sri Ram City Union Finance Limited is justifiable ? Sri Ram City Union Finance Limited, C.C. No. 40/374, Jose If not, what relief they are entitled to get ? Junction, 2nd Floor, Jose Annexe, M.G. Road, Ernakulam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, New Generation (2) Banks & Insurance Employees Federation (AITUC), AITUC Office, Kadappakada, Kollam-691 008 in respect of matters G.O. (Rt.) No. 333/2015/LBR. mentioned in the annexure to this order; Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for industrial dispute exists between Sri. Nasarudeen, adjudication; Al-Ameen Manzil, TKMC P.O., Kuttichira, Kollam and the 12th MAY 2015] KERALA GAZETTE 80 workman of the above referred establishment (4) Smt. Bindhu G. Pillai, Aksharalayam, Chelappalli, G.O. (Rt.) No. 335/2015/LBR. Kottukkal P.O., Anchal in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for industrial dispute exists between Sri N. G. Bahuleyan, adjudication; Chief General Manager, Manappuram Finance Limited, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Valappad P. O., and the workman of the above Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 referred establishment Sri Manojan, K. V., S/o. Kunjambu, (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Pulikkunnu, Thimiri P. O., Via Cheruvathur, Kasaragod in that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is the award within a period of three months. necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; ANNEXURE Whether the denial of employment to Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Smt. Bindhu G. Pillai, Clerk by the management Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Shri. Nasarudeen, Proprietor, Al-Ameen Cashew (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Traders) is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication she is entitled to get ? to the Labour Court, . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. (3)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 334/2015/LBR. ANNEXURE Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. Whether the dismissal of Sri Manojan, K. V. from Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an service by the management of Manappuram industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director, Finance Limited is justifiable ? If not, what are Aachi Masala Foods Private Limited, Plot No. 1926, the reliefs he is entitled to? 1 Block, 34 Street, Aiswarya Colony, Anna Nagar West, Chennai-600 040, (2) the Proprietor, Ganapathi Traders, (5) 13/526, Aroora Buildings, N.H. Bypass Junction, Chandra Nagar, Palakkad and the workman of the above referred G.O. (Rt.) No. 336/2015/LBR. establishment Sri Ramadhas, S/o. K. R. Viswanathan, Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. Kolodu House, Koduvayoor, Palakkad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Calicut Tile And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Company, Feroke P. O. and the workmen of the above necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for referred establishment represented by the General adjudication; Secretary, Tile Workers Sangham (BMS) Vellodi Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Building, Kallayi Road, Kozhikode-673 002 in respect of Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for will pass the award within a period of three months. adjudication;

ANNEXURE Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Whether the denial of employment to Sri Ramadhas, Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Sales Executive by the management of Aachi (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Masala Foods Private Limited, Anna Nagar West, that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Chennai is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will entitled to get ? pass the award within a period of three months. 8 12th MAY 2015] KERALA GAZETTE 81

ANNEXURE And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Whether the denial of Seniority to Sri T. Divakaran, adjudication; T. No. 485 and to Sri M. Vasu, T. No. 515 by the management of Calicut Tile Company, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Feroke is justifiable ? If not, what relief they Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct are entitled to? that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication (6) to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. G.O. (Rt.) No. 337/2015/LBR. ANNEXURE Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. Whether the denial of arrears of wages, bonus, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that field expenses and other benefits to the employees an industrial dispute exists between the General Manager, of M/s. Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Kalyan Sarees, Kovilakathumpadam, Aswani Junction, Limited, Chennai working in various branches in Thrissur-680 022 and the workmen of the above referred Kerala by its management is justifiable ? If not, establishment represented by the President, Asankhaditha what are the benefits they are entitled to ? Mekhala Thozhilali Union (AMTU), Bimbino Building, (8) Court Road, Kozhikode-1 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; G.O. (Rt.) No. 361/2015/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2015. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, adjudication; Kerala State Palmira Products Development & Workers Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Welfare Corporation Limited, Kelpalm House, Kumbamvila, Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Kottamada, Arayur P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 122 and (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct the workmen of the above referred establishment (1) Sri K. V. Krishnanunni, Keezhalipurathu Veedu, that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Kavassery P. O., Alathur, Palakkad-678 543, to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal (2) Smt. C. Vasantha, Parappuram Veedu, Chundakkad, will pass the award within a period of three months. Kavasserry P. O., Palakkad-678 543 in respect of matters ANNEXURE mentioned in the annexure to this order; Whether the transfer of (1) Padmini, S. K., And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is (2) Mayadevi, P., (3) Rajani Dasan, (4) Devi Ravi, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; (5) Alphonsa, (6) Beena Sojan, workers of M/s. Kalyan Sarees, Thrissur by the management is Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by legal and justifiable ? If not, what is the remedy ? Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication (7) to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal G.O. (Rt.) No. 356/2015/LBR. will pass the award within a period of three months.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th March 2015. ANNEXURE Whereas, the Government are of opinion that Whether the denial of employment to an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Sri K. V. Krishnanunni and Smt. C. Vasantha, Director, M/s. Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Limited, employees of Kelpalm Facility Centre, Orchid Towers-313, Valluvarkkottam High Road, Kallepully, Kavassery by its management is Nunkambakkam, Chennai-600 034 and the workmen of the justifiable or not ? If not, what relief they are above referred establishment represented by the General entitled to ? Secretary, Kerala Medical & Sales Representative Association (CITU), B.T.R. Bhavan, Cemetery Junction, By order of the Governor,

Kochi-682 018 in respect of matters mentioned in the MADHU, K., annexure to this order; Deputy Secretary to Government. 9